Professional Documents
Culture Documents
htm
INTERNAL HISTORY
Long they dwelt in their first home by the water under stars, and they walked the Earth in wonder; and they
began to make speech and to give names to all things that they perceived. Themselves they named the
Quendi, signifying those that speak with voices...
By making a language, the Firstborn of Ilúvatar identified themselves as Incarnates, children of the One:
"The making of a lambe [language] is the chief character of an Incarnate," Pengolodh the sage of Gondolin
observed (WJ:397). Indeed "the newly-waked devised many new and beautiful words, and many cunning
artifices of speech" (WJ:422). The language made by the first Elves at Cuiviénen was to have an immense
impact on the linguistic history of Middle-earth. Usually called Primitive Quendian, it was the ultimate
ancestor of all Elvish languages, including Quenya and Sindarin. Even languages not directly descended from
PQ had borrowed words from Elvish, as documented in the articles about Adûnaic, Mannish, Dwarvish and
even Orkish and the Black Speech. WR:159 and PM:63 quote Faramir as saying that "all speech of men in
this world is Elvish in descent". The sole language of Arda that may have been wholly free from Elvish
influence may be Valarin. In practice, Valarin would also be the only language older than Primitive
Quendian. True, Aulë had invented Khuzdul for the Dwarves long before the coming of the Elves, but since
Ilúvatar did not want the Dwarves to come before his own Firstborn, the Dwarves were still sleeping when
the Quendi awoke.
What was it like, the tongue that the Elves formed in those first years of innocence by the starlit waters
of Cuiviénen? We know much of its phonology and methods of derivation; we know less of its precise
grammatical structure. Judging from the daughter-languages that are commonly held to be least changed from
the original, namely Quenya and Telerin, PQ was a case language; an allative ending - da is explicitly
mentioned by Tolkien (WJ:366). Concerning the general style of the primitive language, the vast majority of
words had two or three syllables and ended in a vowel. In VT39:6, Tolkien states that in Quenya, "all final
consonants had probably lost a vowel, if remote Quendian origins were considered". (Some of Tolkien's
"reconstructed" forms nevertheless end in a consonant, but they are not many, and not all the asterisked forms
necessarily describe the oldest stage of the language.) Very characteristic of primitive Elvish are the frequent
long final vowels, e.g. in lindâ "sweet-sounding" or ndorê "land". In three-syllable words, the first and the
second vowel are usually identical (e.g. karani "red"), and in a number of cases the final vowel is also the
same, but long (e.g. eredê "seed", galadâ "tree", kyelepê "silver", ñgolodô "Noldo"). According to VT39:6,
vowels in hiatus probably did not occur medially in the primitive language; where they occur in Quenya an
intervening consonant has been lost. Tolkien's reconstructed forms nonetheless include at least one hiatic
combination, ie, iê; in light of his later concept we may assume that this represents even earlier * ihe or *iñe
1 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
2 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
EXTERNAL HISTORY
There seems to have been no point where Tolkien's Elvish languages existed in a historical vacuum, with no
history of change and evolution behind them. Notes Christopher Tolkien, "Those languages were conceived,
of course, from the very beginning in a deeply 'historical' way... Every element in the languages, every
element in every word, is in principle historically 'explicable' - as are the elements in languages that are not
'invented' - and the successive phases of their intricate evolution were the delight of their creator... They
image language not as 'pure structure', without 'before' and 'after', but as growth, in time." (LR:341) The
diachronic aspect was very important to Tolkien; he seems to have been immensely attracted by the grand
vision of an entire language family growing, changing, evolving, branching out in various directions. When
discussing Elvish words, he very often introduces primitive stems and asterisked "ancestral" forms; he clearly
felt that a word needs a history! (See for instance Letters:382-383.) Of course, this necessitated the
construction (or at least sketching) of a primitive language, an ultimate ancestor for all the successive stages,
since Tolkien could not well extend the history of the Elvish languages indefinitely into the past - especially
when he thought of Elvish history as having one definite beginning in time and space, the awakening of the
Quendi by the mere of Cuiviénen. All forms of Elvish had to be descendants of "Cuiviénenian".
Already in the very first Elvish wordlist, the "Qenya Lexicon" of 1915, the words were derived from
"primitive roots" (as in the Etymologies). These stems provide glimpses of a proto-language that seems
somewhat inspired by the proposed reconstructions of Indo-European, the hypothetical tongue that most
European and some Oriental languages descend from. For instance, Tolkien included stems involving
syllabic N and L, such as SNKN and FLKL (LT2:341, where there are dots under the N's and L's to indicate
that they are syllabic). Apparently starting from the same primitive stems, Tolkien two years later derived a
new Elvish language, cognate with "Qenya" - Gnomish, a Celtic-sounding Elvish language that after thirty
years of revisions and changing conceptions "ultimately became that of the type called Sindarin" (PM:379).
The syllabic consonants of the "Proto-Elfin" of 1915 were gone twenty years later, when the
Etymologies was written. Nevertheless, some ideas about the primitive language go back to the very
beginning. For instance, there is the notion that many words originally began with nasalized explosives nd,
mb, ng (that are reflected in the form that word has following the definite article in the Celtic-sounding
language: Gnomish Golda "Gnome, Noldo", i Ngolda "the Gnome"; similarly Sindarin Golodh "Noldo", i
Ngolodh "the Noldo"). In the Etymologies, quite a few "reconstructed" primitive words are given, allowing us
to get a relatively good impression of the primitive language as Tolkien had now come to think of it.
Of course, Tolkien's prime interest lay in the later Elvish languages, especially Quenya and (Noldorin
>) Sindarin. Even in the Etymologies, primitive Elvish remains a somewhat shadowy entity whose prime
function is to clarify the relationship between the various branches of Elvish and serve as the historical basis
of them all, rather than being an "art-language" in itself. Like everything else, Tolkien's ideas about the
ultimate derivation of certain words were subject to revision. For instance, both SD:419 and the Etymologies
(stem TYUL) agree that the Quenya word for "mast" is tyulma. But according to the Etymologies, tyulma
comes from primitive tyulmâ, while SD:419 has it that tyulma descends from primitive kyulumâ. Both of
these would yield tyulma in Quenya, so there is no discrepancy concerning the sound-changes - but Tolkien's
ideas about the ancestral form changed over time. A similar case is Quenya findë "tress, braid of hair": does it
come from primitive spindê (The Etymologies, stem SPIN) or from phindê (PM:362)? Such indecision goes
back to the very beginning: Discussing the earliest "Lexicons", Christopher Tolkien notes that "in some cases
it seems clear that the word was 'there', so to speak, but its etymology remained to be certainly defined, and
not vice versa" (LT1:246). But Tolkien's general ideas about the primitive language, as exemplified in the
Etymologies, seem to have gotten into shape in the 1930s and did not undergo substantial revisions later. For
instance, in what Christopher Tolkien calls "a very late note" - evidently meaning that it dates from the
seventies - the primitive form of Aulë's title "world-artificer" is given as mbartanô (LT1:266). This seems to
be the same kind of Primitive Elvish as the reconstructed forms in the Etymologies, written forty years
earlier. In any case, the historical development of Quenya and Sindarin had become "minutely refined" in the
last years of Tolkien's life, so he must then have held in mind a quite clear image of their common ancestral
3 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
language. - PM:367.
It should be noted that one early idea was rejected later: the notion that the Elves did not invent
language on their own, but learnt Valarin from Oromë (LR:168). As we have seen, Tolkien later decided that
the Elves were alone for centuries before they were found by the Valar.
Needless to say, the distinction between "recorded" Elvish words and "unattested" forms is pure
fiction. Tolkien's "reconstructed" forms are just as authoritative as the vocabulary of the "attested" languages:
Even if someone could come up with a more plausible reconstruction of Primitive Quendian than Tolkien
did, it would still have to be rejected! In this essay, primitive words "reconstructed" by Tolkien himself are
not asterisked - though Tolkien usually does asterisk them, cheerfully playing his Game.
(The ultimate experiment in Tolkienian linguistics: Teach Primitive Quendian to a few thousand people and
place them on a remote continent all by themselves. Then come back a millennium or two later and check if
their descendants have developed languages similar to Quenya and/or Sindarin.)
The vowels (monophthongs) of Primitive Quendian were a, e, i, o, u, short and long. The long vowels are
usually marked with a macron by Tolkien; here we will use a circumflex instead: â, ê, î, ô, û. As noted above,
the frequent long final vowels are very characteristic of primitive Elvish. (However, the final vowels are
sometimes - but not always - shortened if the word appears the final element in a compound; compare tûrô
"lord" with -turo in Spanturo "cloud-lord"; see also WJ:403 concerning khînâ "child" becoming -khîna.
The plural ending -î remains long, though: kala-kwendî "Calaquendi".) The primitive diphthongs were
apparently ai, au, ei, eu, iu, oi, *ou, ui. (*Ou is not explicitly given in any primitive word "reconstructed" by
Tolkien, but it is implied to have existed, though it seems to have merged with au very early. Cf. Quenya
nausë "imagination"; the root is given as NOWO, so originally, the initial syllable of this word must have
been *now- = *nou-.) Combinations like âi may be taken either as "long diphthongs" or as â followed by i
(two distinct syllables); we cannot know precisely what Tolkien intended. In VT39:11, Tolkien states that
"Eldarin (and probably Primitive Quendian) exhibited a marked preference for diphthongs ending in i".
The consonants may be listed as follows:
Plosives, unvoiced t, p, k and voiced d, b, g. There were also the sounds that Tolkien spells th, ph, kh,
that may represent either spirants (sc. th as in think, f, and German ach-Laut, respectively) or aspirated stops
(sc. t, p, k followed by h). The latter interpretation is by far the most likely, since Old Sindarin th, ph, kh are
said to be aspirated stops (LR:322), later becoming spirants in Sindarin. It is not an economical theory to
postulate that primitive spirants turned into aspirated stops in Old Sindarin and then reverted to spirants in
Sindarin. Th, ph, kh were evidently aspirates, contrasting with the unaspirated stops t, p, k (pronounced like
French or Russian stops, but unlike PQ, these languages do not have a corresponding series of aspirated stops
phonemically distinct from the unaspirated ones - however, Sanskrit does).
Lateral/vibrant: r, l
Glottal (?): h. The sound in question is represented by 3 in the Etymologies and h in the essay Quendi
and Eldar (in LR:360, the original stem yielding Quenya ho "from" is given as 3Ô, while in WJ:368 this
stem is given as HO instead). Christopher Tolkien describes 3 as a "back spirant" in LR:360; this would be
the sound spelt gh in Orkish, the spirant equivalent of G. It may be that Tolkien actually had a guttural or
pharyngeal sound in mind, like Arabic 'ayn, Classical Hebrew 'ayin. Perhaps he later decided that it was more
like English H, as the spelling used in Quendi and Eldar would suggest - but since we are dealing with a
reconstructed form of Elvish, the exact quality of this sound is of little importance.
Nasals: m, n, ñ (ñ = "ng" as in thing)
Sibilant: s (that later, in Common Eldarin, became voiced to z before d). The status of z in the most
4 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
primitive language is uncertain; there is the stem MIZD, but this may again be due to s becoming voiced by
contact with d. EZDÊ must be taken as a Common Eldarin form, in light of what Tolkien says in WJ:403.
Semivowels w and j; the latter is pronounced like English y as in you (not English "dzh" as in John).
When editing the Etymologies for publication, Christopher Tolkien changed J to Y, e.g. KUY, DYEL where
his father actually wrote KUJ, DJEL (see LR:346). This was done with good intentions, since many speakers
of English would misunderstand the letter J, thinking that it referred to the English "dzh"-sound. We retain
this revised spelling when referring to the basic stems listed in the Etymologies (in capital letters), but
otherwise we henceforth restore Tolkien's original spelling in the actual word-forms mentioned in the
Etymologies, e.g. njadrô instead of nyadrô (therefore, the reader should not be confused when njadrô is
derived from a stem NYAD, since Tolkien actually wrote NJAD). In the essay Quendi and Eldar, where many
reconstructed forms occur, Tolkien also used j rather than y, and here Christopher Tolkien left his father's
spelling alone when editing the essay for publication. We also use j in primitive words where it seems that
Tolkien did employ the letter y, to have a uniform spelling. - It may be that j and w often do not stand for
independent semi-vowels, but merely indicate that the preceding consonant is palatalized or labialized,
respectively. Some would count such palatalized and labialized sounds as independent phonemes in Primitive
Quendian.
In the Etymologies, Tolkien in a few cases changed w to v, the stems WAY, WEY becoming VAY, VEY.
Does this mean that he considered introducing v as a primitive sound, as distinct from b or w? The sound v
does not fit the phonology very well; it would be the sole spirant, unless we count 3 as a spirant g rather than
a guttural or pharyngeal sound (and Tolkien may even have decided to change 3 to H; see above). Perhaps v
as a distinct phoneme in Primitive Quendian was just a passing idea.
Initial clusters
The largest group of initial clusters begin in s: sj-, sk-, skj-, skw-, sl-, sm-, sn-, sp-, sr-, st-, sw-.
Some initial clusters may be considered simply nasalised stops: mb, nd, ñg. Already in the Gnomish
Grammar (1917), Tolkien speaks of "words beginning with nasalized-explosives nd, mb, ng (a fairly
numerous class originally)" (Parma Eldalamberon #11, p. 7).
A number of clusters end in one of the two semi-vowels. In J: dj, gj, kj, khj, ndj, ñgj, nj, tj (and sj,
skj already mentioned). In W: gw, ñgw, kw (and skw, sw already mentioned). It would seem that kw already
before the Separation merged into a single labio-velar sound q that remained in Quenya (later spelt qu), while
it very early became p in the dialect of the Teleri - still so in Sindarin and the Telerin of Aman. Some would
interpret kw as a single labio-velar rather than a consonant cluster right from the start. (Tolkien's earliest
"proto-Elfin" - the 1915 stuff - included stems like QORO; see LT1:264. Here, Q does stand for a labio-velar
sound. See also ereqa in the wordlist below.) As mentioned above, some would indeed take several of the
initial "clusters" involving a single consonant + -w or -j as merely a convenient way of spelling labialized
and palatalized series of consonants; hence they would not really be clusters at all.
SD:419 mentions a primitive word with initial hj (or hy, as it is there spelt). Is this a genuine cluster h
+ j, or simply hy as in Quenya, a unitary sound like German ich-Laut?
Stress
In the Etymologies, some twenty-eight reconstructed primitive words include an accent that apparently marks
the stressed syllable (here we use italics instead of an accent mark). Seventeen of the words are marked as
accented on the first syllable: abarô (abaro), alâkô, balâ (and pl. balî in balî-ndore/-ndôre), balâre, Banâ,
banjâ, bata (batâ), belek, belekâ, berja, boron-, b'ras-sê, orku, pheren, telesâ, ûbanô (see wordlist below
for the meaning of the words). Four words are apparently stressed on the penultimate syllable: baradâ,
ontâro, berekâ, morokô, turumbê. Six words are stressed on the final syllable: barasâ, barjâ, barnâ,
battâ, khalnâ, tambâ. From these examples it is clear that in Primitive Elvish, accent was not determined by
the form of the word (as is generally the case in Quenya and Sindarin). The words belekâ, baradâ and
5 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
barasâ have the same number of syllables and exactly the same distribution of consonants and vowels (short
and long), but they are not stressed on the same syllable. There seems to be no certain way of predicting
which syllable receives the accent in Primitive Elvish; we just have to take Tolkien's word in this matter.
Some stems in the Etymologies, like MORÓK, are marked with an accent to indicate which syllable is
stressed - and this is reflected in the derived word morokô. The stem MORÓK just happens to be accented on
the second o, and that's it.
It may be noted that there is no connection between accent and long vowels. One might think that the
frequent long final vowels were accented, but there seems to be no such rule. In alâkô, the one short vowel is
also the one that is accented. Unlike the present writer, the early Elves apparently did not find it difficult to
pronounce long vowels that were wholly unaccented.
6 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
place" (WJ:368). It would seem that in PQ, the "prepositions" normally acted as postpositions instead. (Real
prepositions must have become dominant in Common Eldarin, since they occur in both Quenya and
Sindarin.)
Verbs: There isn't too much we can say about the verbal system in the primitive language. Some
frequent verbal endings, such as -jâ and -tâ (whence Quenya -ya, -ta) can be identified; see "Derivation in
Primitive Elvish" below. WJ:415 suggests that in the primitive language, the past tense was marked by "the
'augment' or reduplicated base-vowel, and the long stem-vowel". Thus, the stem KWE "say, speak" had the
past tense ekwê (the e of KWE being prefixed as an augment and the original e being lengthened to ê). The
stem KAR "make, do", which stem might probably just as well be given as *kara, similarly has the past tense
akâra "made, did". Similarly, we must assume that the past tense of kiri "cut" was *ikîri (my
reconstruction), and so on. In the later languages, the prefixed stem-vowels live on in the Quenya perfects,
while they also appear in one class of Sindarin past tenses (akâra yielding Sindarin agor).
In Quenya, past tenses are often formed with the ending -në (e.g. orta- "raise" > ortanë "raised") or by
nasal infixion + final -ë (e.g. tac- "fasten", pa.t. tancë). Nasal infixion is also found in Sindarin past tenses
(e.g. sogo "to drink" > pa.t. sunc). Since the past tenses involving nasals occur in both Quenya and Sindarin,
they must go back to at least Common Eldarin. No primitive form of the Quenya past tense ending -në is
mentioned by Tolkien in the published material; if it existed, it would probably have been *- nê. Some of the
nasal-infixed past tenses may simply be due to such an ending being added directly to a stem, whereupon the
n and the final consonant of the stem were transposed. For instance, Sindarin sunc "drank" (Quenya *suncë,
not attested) could be derived from, say, CE *sunkê < PQ *suknê, sc. the stem SUK "drink" with the past
tense ending *-nê. But this is speculation and requires shifts like kn > nk, that do not regularly occur; it may
be better to assume that the nasal-infixed form *sunkê is original.
In Quenya, a form held to be the aorist is formed with the ending -ë, that changes to -i when any
ending is added. In the primitive language, this must have been -i everywhere (since final short -i became -ë
in Quenya, but remained unchanged when not final).
One of our very few examples of a primitive present tense is uljâ *"pours", the source of Sindarin eil
"it is raining" (see ULU). May this argue the existence of a primitive present-tense ending -â, the source of
the Quenya ending -a? In WJ:372, Tolkien refers to the "the [present?] tense stems in -â". It would seem that
the ending -â is "invisible" when added to a verb already ending in -â, for the verb uljâ certainly shows the
frequent verbal ending -jâ. Note, however, the form mâtâ "is eating", stated (in VT39:7) to be the
"continuous form" of a stem mata- or MAT "eat" (VT39:7, 11; LR:371). With this compare Letters:427,
where Tolkien states that Quenya palantír comes from a primitive form palantîrâ (or palantîra), and that
this word includes a "continuative stem of TIR watch, gaze at". Clearly the "continous form" mâtâ "is
eating" relates to MAT just like this "continuative stem" tîrâ *"is watching" relates to TIR. It seems that from
basic verbal stems (with no ending like -jâ or -tâ) a continuous form corresponding to English "is ...-ing" can
be derived by lengthening the stem-vowel and adding the ending -â. The Quenya descendants of these forms
(not attested in this case: *máta, *tíra) are clearly what is often called the present tense. Since mâtâ is
translated "is eating", it seems that the continuative stems could function as finite verbs already in the
primitive language.
We have one example of a primitive perfect, namely the form awâwiiê given in WJ:366. It would seem
to be formed by lengthening and prefixing the stem-vowel and adding the suffix -iiê. In Quenya, the ending
has become -ië, but otherwise perfects are still formed in the same way.
How other forms of the verb were constructed in primitive Elvish, we don't know. The infinitive
ending -ië is found both in Quenya and Old Sindarin ("Old Noldorin"), so it must go back to at least Common
Eldarin. Its primitive form may have been -iê (perhaps attested buried in the word luktiênê, see below). The
Quenya and Sindarin future tense endings, -uva and -tha, are evidently not cognate - perhaps suggesting that
one or both are innovations with no counterparts in the primitive language.
It may be noted that the primitive language had no inflectional imperative; instead the independent
imperative particle â, variable in place, was used in conjunction with a verbal stem (WJ:365).
Pronouns: Our knowledge of the primitive pronominal system is far from complete. A first person
7 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
stem NI "I" is given in the Etymologies (LR:378 s.v. NI2), and ni is still found in Quenya (while the origin of
the Sindarin word for "I", im, is obscure). The Quenya ending -mmë for (exclusive) "we" and the
corresponding Sindarin ending -m argue the existence of a primitive 1st person plural pronoun including the
sound m in Common Eldarin at the latest. Tolkien speaks of de and its variant le as "pronominal elements in
the 2nd person" (WJ:363). Quenya tye "you" (as object, "thee") and the Sindarin ending -ch *"you" seem to
indicate that there was also a 2nd person element including the sound k (since Quenya tye in light of the
Sindarin ending must be assumed to descend from *kje, while Sindarin -ch represents older *-kk-).
Concerning the 3rd person, the demonstrative stem TA "that" is relevant (it yields Quenya ta "that, it").
Quenya te "them" (and "they"?) may descend from unstressed *tai, sc. ta "that [one]" with a plural ending:
*"those". The 3rd person was apparently primarily associated with another demonstrative stem, S-. Under this
stem, the Etymologies lists sû or su (or sô/so) as an evidently primitive pronoun "he", while "she" is sî or si
(or sê, se). Here, reference is also made to "-so inflexion of verbs" and the corresponding feminine "-se
inflexion", evidently meaning that these pronouns were attached to verbs to express that "he" or "she" was
the subject of the verb. Whether these inflections occurred already in the most primitive language is not clear.
Other parts of speech: An example of an adverb is provided by the word akwâ, according to WJ:415
"an extension or intensification of *kwâ, used adverbially" (Quenya aqua "fully, completely, altogether,
wholly"). Another example is hekwâ "leaving aside, not counting, excluding, except", stated to be both
adverb and preposition (WJ:364-5). This is formed from the "adverbial element" HEKE, HEK, meaning
"aside, apart, separate" (WJ:361, 364). No special adverbial ending, like English - ly, is known; the ending
-wâ seen in the word hekwâ is also an adjectival ending (see "Derivation" below). - One "primitive negative
element" is mentioned in WJ:370: bâ "no!" (also abâ, aba), expressing refusal, not denial of facts.
Otherwise, words based on the stem LA "no, not" or the negative stems GÛ, MÛ and their prefixed variants
UGU, UMU were evidently used to form negations. - It is not known whether there were articles in the
primitive language; this may be doubtful. The source of the article i "the" in Quenya and Sindarin, namely
the stem I, is stated to be a "deitic particle" (LR:361). So while Quenya i alda and Sindarin i 'aladh mean
"the tree", primitive *i galadâ evidently meant "that tree" instead. Later, the meaning of i was weakened
from "that" to "the" (perhaps already in Common Eldarin, since Quenya and Sindarin share this article). The
Romance languages got their definite articles just like this: Their ancestor Latin had no word for "the", but
the meaning of Latin demonstratives (typically ille, illa) was weakened to produce articles like la or el.
COMMON ELDARIN
As noted above, Common Eldarin (CE) is the next stage of Primitive Elvish. This is the language of the
original Eldar as distinct from the Avari, the tongue developed from Primitive Quendian during the two and a
half centuries the March from Cuiviénen to the sea lasted, and hence the last common ancestor of Quenya
and Sindarin.
In PM:342, Tolkien actually states, "When the Eldar arrived in Aman and settled there they had
already a long history behind them...also their languages had been elaborated and changed and were very
different from their primitive speech as it was before the coming of Oromë." No drastic changes are reflected
in the material that has been published to far, however. In many cases, PQ words would be unchanged in CE;
note that ñgolodô (Noldo) is said to be both CE (WJ:379) and PQ (WJ:381). The plural ending was still -î, as
in elenî "stars" (WJ:360).
As mentioned in the introduction, there are only three forms in the Etymologies that are explicitly
identified as "Eld" = Eldarin, evidently meaning Common Eldarin: mahtâ- "to handle", ndæ^r
"bridegroom", wa "together" (see MA3, NDER, WÔ). These three are derived from earlier ma3tâ-, ndêro and
wo, forms that must necessarily be PQ. A number of other Common Eldarin forms are found in WJ and PM,
as well as in Vinyar Tengwar #42. Some phonological developments may be observed. The change of
stressed wo to wa is explicitly mentioned in Etym (under WÔ). In PQ ma3tâ > CE mahtâ we are evidently
to understand that the sound 3 (sc. spirant g, according to Christopher Tolkien) became unvoiced by
8 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
assimilation to the following t, if the spelling "ht" in mahtâ represents German ach-Laut + t, as it does in the
Quenya form mahta-. Forms like the verb wahtâ- "to soil, stain" and the noun wahsê "stain" from the stem
WA3 must therefore be taken to be Common Eldarin for Primitive Quendian *wa3tâ-, *wa3sê. (Note that in
wa3râ "soiled, dirty", 3 is unchanged, because there is no unvoiced consonant following.)
The main change seems to have affected the short final vowels. Original -a, -e and -o disappeared; for
instance, PQ abaro "recussant" yielded CE abar (WJ:371), while PQ kwene "person" became CE kwên
(WJ:360 - the PQ word kwende seems to be unchanged in CE, though). According to most sources, long -â,
-ê, -ô were unchanged, as were -î and -û - though VT42 cites some CE forms in which the long final vowels
may seem to have become short already, e.g. daira "large, great" or netere "nine". Whatever the case may
be, it may have been at the CE stage original short -i and -u turned into -e and o, a change reflected in
Quenya. The change of short final -i to -e is also reflected in Old Sindarin, so it would seem that this change
occurred in Common Eldarin, the ancestor of both languages. As the CE word kwên as compared to PQ
kwene demonstrates, the vowel of the new monosyllabic words could be lengthened (but not in the plural
form kwenî, where the word was not monosyllabic - this is still reflected in Quenya quén, pl. queni instead of
**quéni).
Another change was that "medial h was very early lost without trace in CE", the noun enclitic -hô
"from" becoming -ô, the origin of the Quenya genitive ending -o (WJ:368). This would seem to support what
we argued above: that in mahtâ-, the letter H actually stands for ach-Laut. This stronger "H" wasn't lost (still
present in Quenya mahta-).
Some difficult consonant clusters changed into more pronouncable combinations in Common Eldarin
"and possibly earlier", sc. already in PQ (WJ:416). In WJ:416, the shift bm > mb is mentioned, PQ labmê
"tongue" (language) becoming lambê in CE at the latest. In the Etymologies, we find double forms like
stabnê, stambê "room" (STAB); may this suggest a similar change bn > mb, perhaps at the CE stage? (But in
this case, the bn form must have survived alongside the new mb form, since "Old Noldorin"/Old Sindarin
still has stabne.) We know from WJ:403 that the combination sd was assimilated to zd in Common Eldarin,
esdê "repose" becoming ezdê. (The stem EZDÊ in the Etymologies must therefore be understood as an
Common Eldarin form; not all the heads of the entries in Etym represent primitive roots. EZDÊ < esdê is
itself a rearranged form of the basic stem SED "rest".) While s became voiced to z before d, it seems that d
was devoiced to t before s, primitive sjadsê "cleft, gash" becoming sjatsê (SYAD). Perhaps the change ds >
ts also occurred at the Common Eldarin stage.
Common Eldarin may have introduced some new diphthongs derived from e, o. Later Loremasters
were "inclined to the opinion that...ae, ao [produced by A-infixion] were not primitive developments, but
comparatively late and due to the analogy of ai : i, and au : u" (see VT39:9-10). "Comparatively late" may
mean at the Common Eldarin stage rather than in Primitive Quendian. The fact that words that originally
must have contained the diphthongs ae, ao are found both in Quenya and in Telerin strongly supports this
conclusion. In Quenya, these diphthongs became é and ó, respectively; in Telerin they both became á. As an
example, Tolkien mentions Quenya méla "loving, affectionate", Telerin mála. Both of these are derived from
an A-infixed form of the stem MEL "love", implied to be *maelâ (not explicitly given). See VT39:10.
Common Eldarin was not an entirely uniform structure; already on the March, there were dialects. At a
very early stage, perhaps even before the Separation, the Teleri shifted original kw (> Quenya qu) to p, a
change that is still reflected in Sindarin and the Telerin of Aman (like Quenya quár "fist" corresponding to
Sindarin paur, Telerin pár; all of these descend from primitive kwâra, PM:318). In PM:401, Pengolodh
points out that "the Quendi were sundered also in speech: the Avari from the Eldar; and the Teleri from the
other Eldar".
9 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
or stem is a somewhat abstract skeleton containing a basic meaning, and in the process of derivation this
skeleton is fleshed out to produce actual words developing its meaning. For instance, the general idea of
youth is apparently contained in the stem NETH - Tolkien simply wrote "young" to suggest its meaning - but
this is not to say that the primitive Elvish word for "young" was neth. NETH is just the basis of actual words
like nêthê "youth" or nethrâ "young" (whence Quenya nésë, nessa). The Etymologies is for the most part a
list of such stems followed by some of the actual words that they yielded in various languages. (However,
some of the entry-heads in Etym seem to be complete words in themselves, such as RAMBÂ "wall" or
TINKÔ "metal".) The vast majority of primitive Elvish words consist of a stem combined with an ending;
these endings are explored in detail below.
"My father wrote a good deal on the theory of sundokarme or 'base-structure'," Christopher Tolkien
informs us (LR:343). However, only his own summary of his father's ideas is available to us: "Very briefly
indeed, the Quendian consonantal 'base' or sundo was characterised by a 'determinant vowel' or sundóma:
thus the sundo KAT has a medial sundóma 'A', and TALAT has the sundóma repeated. In derivative forms
the sundóma might be placed before the first consonant, e.g. ATALAT" (WJ:319). It would seem, then, that
the "base" consists of consonants (like K-T in KAT) plus a "determinant vowel" (in this case A) that can
move around and be reduplicated - but since it has to be present somewhere, the Quendian base structure is
not a "Semitic" system with purely consonantal roots, as in Khuzdul. This is more like the Adûnaic system:
consonantal roots that are associated with a certain "Characteristic Vowel" that can be inserted in various
places, but has to be present in all derived words - or stems with the same consonants would become
impossible to tell apart.
The system that eventually crystalized at Cuiviénen featured a "basic structure" with a preference of
stems of "the pattern X-X(-), with a fixed medial consonant...such as *Dele, *Heke, *Tele, *Kala, *Kiri,
*Nuku, *Ruku, etc. A large number of monosyllabic stems (with only an initial consonant or consonant
group) still appear in the Eldarin tongues; and many of the dissyllabic stems must have been made by
elaboration of these" (WJ:392). When Tolkien speaks of "the pattern X-X(-)", he evidently means
"consonant-vowel-consonant(-vowel)". Usually, the first and the second vowel are identical; indeed it doesn't
seem to matter whether the stems for, say, "follow" and "lick" are given as KHILI and LABA (WJ:387, 416)
or simply as KHIL and LAB, as in the Etymologies (LR:364, 367). In a similar manner, the stem for "pour"
is given both as ULU (LR:396) and as UL (WJ:400). Likewise, stems like the ones Tolkien lists as examples
- *Dele, *Heke etc. - could probably just as well be given as DEL-, *HEK- etc. (DEL is actually found in
WJ:363). The latter system seems to be employed in the Etymologies (note that Etym has KAL where
WJ:392 gives *Kala-); the stem ULU instead of UL is one of the few exceptions. In Etym, the suffixed
stem-vowels may have been dropped simply to save space. But when Tolkien in WJ:392 mentions
"monosyllabic" stems, he seems to be referring to stems with no consonant following the first vowel (like
KWE, NA), so that the vowel cannot be suffixed.
While Tolkien in WJ:392 speaks of a "large number" of such monosyllabic stems, they are relatively
rare in our corpus. On the same page in WJ, Tolkien speculates that a stem KWE referring to vocal speech
may have existed at the most primitive stage, but was later expanded to KWENE and KWETE, thus being
adapted to the system that had evolved in the meantime. In the Etymologies, most of the stems listed consist
of three elements: an initial consonant or a consonant group, a vowel, and one consonant following the vowel
(e.g. BAL, SPAN). In some cases, there is no initial consonant (e.g. EL), but there are very few stems of one
syllable that lack the final consonant, such as NÂ "to be" (LR:374 s.v. NÂ2). As noted above, the latter
seems to be the kind of stems Tolkien calls "monosyllabic" in WJ:392 (and not stems like KWEN, EL, DEL
[WJ:361-363], that can readily be turned into polysyllabic stems by suffixing the stem vowel: KWENE,
ELE, DELE [WJ:360]). Of the more than six hundred stems listed in the Etymologies, less than thirty have
this "monosyllabic" structure, and several of them are not the stems of verbs, nouns or adjectives, but
prepositions, particles, prefixes and the like. (Some stems originally ended in a guttural consonant written as
3, but lost it and had the vowel lenghtened in compensation: DO3 > DÔ and evidently TA3 > TÂ. Perhaps
stems like THÊ, THÛ, YÔ are to be understood as later forms of *THE3, *THU3, *YO3, not given.) In
accordance with this, Tolkien stated that "the later view [of the Loremasters in Middle-earth] was that in fact
10 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
'full stems' (meaning noun-adjective or verb stems) were actually by the end of the common development of
primitive Quendian seldom if ever monoconsonantal" (VT39:11). "Monoconsonantal" is a better term for this
kind of stems than "monosyllabic".
The stem for "bite" is a good example of how a stem can be modified to produce the basis for new
words. No less than four varieties of it are found in the Etymologies. First there is NAK, apparently the most
basic form, with the simple meaning "bite". The stem NDAK "slay" is evidently to be understood as a
strengthened form of NAK, the strengthening of the initial consonant symbolizing the intensified meaning.
Another variant of NAK prefixes the stem-vowel to produce ÁNAK, a stem yielding words for "jaw", the
body-part used for biting (Quenya anca, Sindarin anc, both from primitive ankâ, in turn derived from
ÁNAK; see NAK). A fourth possible variant is NAYKA with an infixed Y (and the stem-vowel suffixed);
this is called an "elaboration" of NAK. This "elaborated" stem seems to mean basically *"biting" and hence
*"painful"; it yields words like Quenya naicë, Sindarin naeg "(sharp) pain". We will now have a closer look
at the various ways of manipulating a stem.
Stem vowel prefixed: In the entry I in the Etymologies, Tolkien explains that i is an "intensive prefix where i
is base vowel". He mentions ITHIL "Moon" as an example; this is derived from a stem (or "base") THIL
"shine silver" (see SIL). INDIS "bride" as a name of the goddess Nessa comes from NDIS "woman"; the
vowel-prefixed variant i-ndise is called an "intensive form". Cf. also WJ:318, where Quenya and Sindarin
estel "hope" is said to be a stemvowel-prefixed derivative of a stem STEL "remain firm".
In a number of cases, vowel-prefixed versions of a stem are given as separate entries in the
Etymologies. Sometimes, the stress moves to the new first syllable; sometimes the original stem-vowel
retains the accent. ÁLAK "rushing" is derived from LAK2 "swift". ÁNAK "jaw" from NAK "bite" has
already been mentioned. ANÁR "sun" is stated to be a derivative of NAR1 "flame, fire". (In the Silmarillion
appendix, entry nár, Christopher Tolkien mentions (a)nar as "the same ancient root" that yielded words for
both fire and sun.) AYAN "holy" is derived from YAN of similar meaning. ELED "go, depart, leave"
connects with LED "go, fare, travel". ÉNED "centre" comes from NED of similar meaning. ERÉD, yielding
words for "seed", is derived from RED "scatter, sow". ÓLOS "dream" is connected to LOS "sleep". ÓROM,
the stem that according to the Etymologies is the source of the name of the Vala Oromë, comes from ROM
"loud noise, horn-blast" (but Tolkien later rejected this as an Elvish folk etymology). It has been suggested
that ÓROK, the stem that the Elvish words for Orc are traced to in the Etymologies, is connected to ROK-,
the stem for "horse". While this may seem semantically strained, ROK- may originally have referred to the
steed of "the dark Rider upon his wild horse" that afflicted the Elves at Cuiviénen, evidently some servant of
Morgoth (Silmarillion ch. 3). Hence the strengthened stem ÓROK could be used of other evil creatures.
(However, Tolkien seems to have dropped this idea and decided to derive the Elvish words for "Orc" from a
stem RUKU instead; see WJ:389.) The negative stems GÛ, MÛ have prefixed variants UGU, UMU. Slightly
more complex is the derivation of AKLA-R *"brillance" from KAL "shine" and OKTÂ "war" from KOT
"strive, quarrel"; here the stem-vowel is prefixed as usual, but also lost in its normal position, and other
endings are introduced. Other examples of words where the stem-vowel is removed from its normal place
between the first and second consonant of the stem to be prefixed instead include esdê "repose" from SED
"rest" (see WJ:403), the above-mentioned ankâ "jaw" from NAK "bite" and ostô "fortress" from the stem
SOTO- "shelter, defend" (see WJ:414 for the latter). Cf. also the agental formation edlô from DEL, DELE
"walk, go, proceed travel" - but also edelô with the stem-vowel of DEL intact. In WJ:363, Tolkien says that
the word edlô displays "loss of sundóma" (stemvowel), and so, obviously, do words like esdê, ostô, ankâ.
The stem RUKU is said to have variant forms uruk- and urk(u). It is perhaps impossible for monosyllabic
stems like KWA (having to do with completion) to appear without their stem-vowel in its normal place, but it
may still be prefixed, as in the derivative akwâ (according to WJ:415 "an extension or intensification of
*kwâ, used adverbially" - Quenya aqua "fully, completely, altogether, wholly").
A-infixion: In some cases, a new vowel A is inserted into a stem, turning the stem-vowels i, u into diphthongs
ai, au. The stem SLIW "sickly" yields the adjective slaiwâ "sickly, sick, ill" (contrast another derivative,
11 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
slîwê "sickness", that does not show infixion). A-infixion is also seen in the word taun ?"hill" from TUN (see
MINI). From the stem MIL-IK *"greed" is derived Mailikô, a name of Melkor. Yet other examples from the
Etymologies are thausâ "foul" from THUS and taurâ "mighty" from TUR. In WJ:337, Tolkien derives
maikâ "sharp, penetrating, going deep in" from a stem mik "pierce". Besides, the Quenya word nauta
"bound" derived from NUT points to a primitive form *nautâ (not given); likewise, Sindarin glaer (glær)
"long lay" from GLIR must descend from *glairê (cf. Quenya lairë). In the essay Quendi and Eldar, naukâ
"ill-shapen, *short" is derived from a stem NUKU "stunted". This is called an "adjectival formation"
(WJ:413); note that maikâ, naukâ, slaiwâ, taurâ, thausâ are also adjectives. A-infixion is also found in the
abstract khaimê "habit" form KHIM "adhere" (that also yields the adjective khîmâ "sticky" without
A-infixion - as if to keep things from getting too predictive!) Furthermore, one of the "ancient forms" of the
stem RUKU (having to do with "fear", the source of the Elvish words for Orc) is given as rauk- (WJ:415).
Using examples from Quenya, Tolkien explained that words formed by A-infixion "were mostly 'intensive',
as in rauko 'very terrible creature' (*RUK); taura 'very mighty, vast, of unmeasured might or size' (*TUR).
Some were 'continuative', as in Vaire 'Ever-weaving' (*WIR)" (VT39:10). - Whether A-infixion ever
produced diphthongs ae, ao from simple e, o, just like this process produced ai, au from i, u, was a matter of
debate. Fëanor held that such forms had indeed occurred in the Primitive Quendian, but as mentioned above,
later Loremasters were "inclined to the opinion that this ae, ao were not primitive developments, but
comparatively late and due to the analogy of ai : i, and au : u" (see VT39:9-10).
I/Y-infixion: This seems to be rarer than A-infixion. It is stated that the stem NAYKA *"painful" may be an
"elaboration" of NAK "bite"; NAYKA yields Quenya words in naic-. The stem WAIWA "blow" is
apparently an I-infixed variant of WAWA, that in turn seems to be a reduplicated form of WÂ. In VT39:11,
Tolkien indicates that "desiderative" formations often show i-infixion; see below.
Nasal infixion: Stems could be modified by infixing a nasal before the second consonant of the stem, m
before b and p, and n otherwise (except possibly ñ before w, see below). Thus, the stem DAT "fall down"
has a nasal-infixed variant DANT. LAK1 "swallow" becomes LANK-, yielding words for "throat". One of
the "ancient forms" of the them RUKU is nasal-infixed: runk- (WJ:415).
Nasal-infixion is not uncommon in the derived words. For instance, TUG yields tungâ "taut, tight",
and ronyô "chaser, hound of chase" comes from a stem ROY "chase" (LR:384 s.v. ROY1). In some cases, it
is hard to tell whether seemingly nasal-infixed forms are actually due to later metathesis. Quenya sambë
"room" is said to descend from primitive stabnê, stambê. The latter would seem to reflect a nasal-infixed
form of the stem STAB, but Tolkien's wording can also be interpreted to mean that the oldest form was
stabnê derived from STAB simply by adding an ending, and that the cluster bn later underwent metathesis to
become *nb > mb. Alternatively, Tolkien may have meant to say that it was impossible to tell whether the
ancestral form of Quenya sambë was stabnê or stambê. Another such double form is found under SYAD:
sjadnô, sjandô "cleaver" = sword. Whatever the case, the stem PAT yields both patnâ "wide" and the
nasal-infixed form pantâ "open", words that were seemingly distinct also originally, so it would seem that
nasal-infixion did occur also in the primitive language.
There is one example of ñ-infixion before w: liñwi "fish" from the stem LIW.
Strengthening, fortification, reinforcement, enrichment: These are Tolkien's terms for certain changes that
stems sometimes undergo. For instance, RUKU also appear as a "strengthened stem" gruk- (WJ:415); in this
case the "strengthening" consists of a g-prefix. A prefix s is seen in s-rot- "delve underground, excavate,
tunnel" as compared to the simpler stem rot (PM:365; groto in WJ:414 is apparently a g-prefixed variant).
(According to VT39:11, later loremasters held that the original strengthening of r initially was dr rather than
gr; the latter was modelled on the frequent variation l / gl.) Fëanor is said (in VT39:9) to have cited examples
of initial strengthening involving "the relations between initial st- and s-, or t-; gl- and l-; ky- and kw- and k-".
Another "frequent initial enrichment" (WJ:413), that particularly impressed Fëanor, is turning b, d, g into
nasalized plosives mb, nd, ñg. This could be called nasal prefixion, the initial version of the nasal infixion
12 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
discussed above. However, initial n, like d, may be strengthened to nd, and m can similarly become mb
(changes that can also occur in the middle of words, see below). Perhaps initial ñ could be strengthened to ñg
(no examples). In LR:377, the stem ÑGYÔ, ÑGYON "grandchild, descendant" is suggested to be related to
YÔ, YON "son", suggesting that Y- can be strengthened to ÑGY-.
The stem DORO "dried up, hard, unyielding" yields PQ ndorê "dry land" by initial enrichment d > nd
(WJ:413). The stem NDER "bridegroom" is said to be a "strengthened form of der" (LR:375), sc. the stem
DER "man". NDUL, yielding words meaning "dark, dusky, obscure", comes from DUL "hide, conceal".
MBAD "duress, prison, doom, hell" is a strengthening of BAD "judge". MBUD, the stem that yields words
for "nose", comes from BUD "jut out". MBAR "dwell, inhabit" is said to be related to BAR, though it is not
clear how they connect semantically (the probable original meaning of BAR is given as "raise"). Concerning
the strengthening N > ND and M > MB, there is the stem NDIS ?"bride", said to be a "strengthening" of NIS
"woman" (LR:375). The stem NDÛ "go down, sink" comes from NÛ, an apparently prepositional stem
yielding such words as "down" and "under". We have already mentioned NAK "bite" > NDAK "slay". The
stem MASAG "knead" connects with MBAS of similar sense; presumably they are both elaborations of a
simpler root *MAS. (Note, however, that there are many stems with initial MB, ND that cannot be matched
with any corresponding stem in B-/M- or D-/N-. In such cases, we must assume that the nasalized stop is
"original".)
Similar changes can also occur in the middle of words. Kwende "elf" is derived from a stem KWENE
by "primitive fortification of the median n > nd" (WJ:360). Cf. also some words in the Etymologies, like
tundu "hill, mound" from TUN. The Quenya verb tamba- "knock, keep on knocking" vs. the simpler verb
tam- "tap" indicates that a fortification m > mb has taken place (stem TAM). Tolkien explains that Lindâ
"Linda, Teler-elf" is derived from the primitive stem LIN by "reinforcement of the medial N and adjectival
-â" (WJ:382). Common Eldarin eldâ, "an adjectival formation 'connected or concerned with the stars' ",
would seem to be derived after the same pattern and includes a medial fortification l > ld (stem EL, ELE);
this is not found initially.
In the middle of words, the "median" could also be doubled: Grottâ "a large excavation" is an
"intensified" form (WJ:415) of grotâ "excavation" (WJ:414). Concerning the stem for "horse", ROKO, it is
said that this is actually an "older simpler form of the stem, found in some compounds and compound names,
though the normal form of the independent word 'horse' had the fortified form rokko" (WJ:407). As we see,
rokko is "fortified" by doubling the middle consonant of ROKO. The word battâ "trample", with "medial
consonant lengthened in frequentative formation" (LR:351), provides us with an example of a "fortified"
verbal stem: The basic stem BAT means "tread", and the fortified stem symbolizes the repetition of the
action by lengthening the middle consonant. For the semantic change, compare Quenya tam- "tap" vs. tamba-
"knock, keep on knocking" mentioned above.
Extension: Some stems have special "extended" forms made by suffixing the stem-vowel (as in DELE
compared to DEL - in Quenya, this is called ómataina or "vocalic extension") and adding a final consonant,
usually n, k, t, or s. In the Etymologies, the stem BORÓN is said to be an extension of BOR "endure" (when
accented on the second syllable it is a verbal form of the noun-stem bóron-). A similar extension involving a
final n is provided by the stem EL, ELE yielding Common Eldarin elen "star" (said to represent an
"extended base", WJ:360; compare Old Sindarin toron "brother" from TOR; cf. also the pairs
PHER/PHÉREN "beech" and THOR/THORON "eagle").
Among the "ancient forms" of the stem RUKU (having to do with fear) are rukus and rukut
(WJ:415). Could the extended stems with ómataina followed by t be what Tolkien refers to as "the so-called
kalat-stems" in WJ:392? Kalat looks like an extended form of KAL, the stem having to do with "light". If
so, yet another example may be the stem ÓROT "height, mountain", that is apparently extended from the
more basic stem ORO "up; rise; high". Here we see how the extended form develops the meaning of the
more basic stem (the other examples of extended stems are not separately glossed). Double stem-forms in the
Etymologies, like LEP/LEPET "finger" or ESE/ESET "name" seem to exemplify the same phenomenon. A
certain example is arat-, that in PM:363 is said to be "an extended form of the stem ara- 'noble' ". When the
stem NA "to be" yields Quenya nat "thing", this may reflect a similar t-extension.
13 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
There are some possible extensions with final -k, like OTOK "seven" from OT. Perhaps NÁYAK
"pain" is connected with NAY "lament", while KIRIK (whence Quenya circa "sickle") is definitely extended
from KIR- "cut, cleave" (not defined in the Etymologies, but see kir- in the Silmarillion Appendix; cf. also
KIRIS "cut" as noun - another expanded form). LEPEK is given as an extension of LEP "five" (also
LEPEN). Cf. also MIL-IK *"greed", evidently an extension of a simpler stem *MIL (whence Quenya mailë
by A-infixion).
Extensions involving final -s (cf. rukus and KIRIS above) include OT/OTOS "seven" (also OTOK
already mentioned), THEL/THELES "sister", TER/TERES "pierce", PHAL/PHÁLAS "foam" (plus the
variant SPAL/SPALAS); cf. also KYEL(ES) "glass". The stem NIS "woman" is said to be "elaborated from
INI" (see NDIS); perhaps NIS should rather be derived from the simple stem NÎ "woman", of which INI
must be a vowel-prefixed version. (For the shortening of the long stem-vowel in the vowel-prefixed variant,
compare the negative stems GÛ vs. UGU and MÛ vs. UMU.) Tolkien speculates that THUS
?"evil-smelling" is related to (extended from?) THÛ "puff, blow". The latter examples indicate that
"monosyllabic" stems (stems with no final or "medial" consonant) can be expanded by adding the final
consonant -n, -t, -s directly to the original stem-vowel; the vowel cannot be reduplicated finally because
there is no consonant to which it can be suffixed. (But apparently the stem-vowel can be reduplicated
following the new consonant after the consonant has been added; cf. Tolkien's reference in WJ:392 to the
stem "*KWE, of which *KWENE and *KWETE were elaborations".)
Note that there are some stems that seem to be polysyllabic right from the start. For instance,
KYELEK "swift, agile" can for semantic reasons hardly be an expanded form of KYEL "come to an end".
It should be noted that Tolkien sometimes uses the term "extended stem" also with reference to stems
with a prefixed stem-vowel (see above), when the vowel is still present in its normal place.
Differentiation: As noted above, the long forms of stems with a final vowel usually involve simple repetition
of the stem-vowel: DEL > DELE, KAL > KALA etc. But there are some rare cases where another final
vowel, -U, turns up. In WJ:411, Tolkien mentions a stem TELE "close, end, come at the end" and adds that
"this was possibly distinct from *tel-u 'roof in, put the crown on a building'... But *telu may be simply a
differentiated form of *TELE, since the roof was the final work of a building." It would seem that variant or
"differentiated" stems could be made by modifying the final vowel.
Except for TELU, the evidence for such stems is usually indirect. The stem KEL "go, run (especially
of water)" clearly has a longer form KELU. (The Index to Unfinished Tales, entry Celos, actually mentions a
root kelu- "flow out swiftly".) The longer form turns up in Quenya celumë "stream, flow" (but not in celma
"channel"). The Ilkorin word for "river", celon, is derived from what seems to be an expanded form in -n:
"kelu + n", hence *kelun (LR:363). A similar case seems to be Quenya cotumo "enemy" from KOT, KOTH:
the middle u has to come from somewhere. There are also some Quenya stems in -u, such as nicu- "be chill,
cold (of weather)" (WJ:417) or hlapu- "fly or stream in the wind" (MC:223). But how they relate to
"differentiated" stems like TELU, if they do at all, is far from clear.
Variation: There seems to be some variation between certain similar consonants, such as T/TH/D, and also
between TH and S. In the Etymologies, there is obviously a connection (confirmed by Tolkien's own
cross-reference) between the stems PAT, having to do with openness, and PATH, yielding words like
"Noldorin" pathw "level space" (Classical Sindarin *pathu). It is also suggested (in LR:393) that THIN,
yielding words for "grey", may be a variant of TIN "emit slender (silver, pale) beams". Similarly, there is
obviously a connection between the stems DAL "flat", LAD *"wide" and LAT "lie open". The stems SIL,
THIL "shine" are said to be variants, and a similar variation S/TH is seen in the pairs GOS/GOTH "dread"
and KHIS/KHITH "mist, fog". Variation SP/PH is seen in SPAL/SPALAS, variant of PHAL/PHÁLAS
"foam". KAR "make, do" seems to have a variant KYAR "cause", and under the stem KEL "go, run" we
find references to KYEL "come to an end, run out" and KWEL "fade, fade away, wither". The variation
between different semi-vowels (Y/W) that is seen in the pair KYEL/KWEL is also found in KHAW as
compared to KAY "lie down"; in the Etymologies, KHAW is equated with the latter stem. This also provides
an example of variation K/KH; cf. also RIK(H) "jerk, sudden move". Under TAM "knock" there is a
14 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
reference to NDAM "hammer, beat"; the latter seems to display both "initial enrichment" with a prefixed
nasal and variation T/D. Primitive Elvish evidently did not allow *NT as an initial combination, so it had to
become ND instead. This principle may also explain the second element of the name Moringotto (MR:194),
said to be the Quenya form of the name Morgoth, the Black Enemy: If the -ngotto part suggests a primitive
form *ñgottô "enemy", this word could be referred to the stem KOT, KOTH "strive, quarrel" by assuming
that the "initial enrichment" of K- is *ÑG- rather than ?ÑK-. The "initial enrichment" of P- would likewise
be *MB- rather than ?MP-, though we have no examples.
Variation P/T is found in the stems PIK and TIK; both of these evidently have to do with smallness.
Under TIK, Tolkien made a cross-reference to PIK. Variation between T and D is seen in the pair TING,
DING, but since these words are simply onomatopoeic, such variation is to be expected.
According to WJ:363, there was "some evidence" that variation between D and L occurred in Primitive
Quendian, "a notable example being de/le as pronominal elements in the 2nd person". In late PQ, GL
appeared as an initial variation of L (WJ:411, cf. VT39:11).
Variation between different vowels is much rarer, but BEL "strong" is tentatively compared by Tolkien
to to the stem BAL (whence balâ "Power, god, Vala"), and under NAT "lace, weave, tie" Tolkien made a
cross-reference to NUT "tie, bind".
15 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
"monster".
Note that in actual words, j as the final consonant of a stem invariably becomes i before a consonant,
merging with the stem-vowel to produce a diphthong in -i (as when the stem TUY - or TUJ - yields the word
tuimâ "a sprout, bud" - for *tujmâ). Similarly, w becomes u before a consonant, as when TIW yields tiukâ
"thick, fat" (for *tiwkâ). If a two-syllable stem loses its second vowel in a derivative form, and the middle
consonant is a semi-vowel that is thus brought into direct contact with the final consonant, the semi-vowel
may again merge with the preceding vowel to form a diphthong (as when the stem LÁYAK manifests as laik-,
for *layk- or *lajk-, in the derivative laik-wâ "green").
Sometimes, but not always, j becomes i also before vowels, as when DAY (DAJ) yields daio "shade" -
but contrast naje "lament" from NAY (NAJ).
Most primitive words ended in a vowel, sometimes short but often long. The vowel may be a complete
ending in itself or part of a longer ending. No hard-and-fast rules can be formulated as to what the different
final vowels denote; at most there are certain tendencies. Very generally speaking, words with final A are
often verbs or adjectives, and if they are nouns, they denote concrete things more often than substances or
intangibles. Words in E are usually nouns and tend to denote abstracts or substances rather than simple,
tangible objects. Words in I are often colour-adjectives; if they are nouns they usually denote female beings.
Words in O are for the most part nouns and typically denote animate (male) beings; very often such words
have an agental meaning. Words in U are relatively rare; they are nearly always nouns and typically denote
either male beings or body parts.
The ending -â (or -a) occurs on many types of words, but most prominent is the adjectival ending -â,
mentioned by Tolkien in WJ:382. Adjectives may be derived by simple suffixation, like mizdâ "wet" from
the stem MIZD or telesâ "rear" from TELES. However, the ending is often combined with certain
manipulations of the stem:
- Medial fortifications like M > MB, N > ND, L > LD, e.g. rimbâ "frequent, numerous" from RIM,
kandâ "bold" from KAN, kuldâ "golden-red" from KUL.
- Nasal infixion, e.g. tungâ "taut, tight" from TUG; cf. also WJ:375, where Tolkien derives pendâ
"sloping" from a stem PED "slope, slant down".
- A-infixion, e.g. thausâ "foul, evil-smelling, putrid" from THUS, taurâ "masterful, mighty" from TUR
(cf. also maikâ "sharp" from MIK, WJ:337, and naukâ *"stunted" from NUKU, WJ:413).
- I-infixion; this occurs in a small group of desiderative formations. For instance, the adjective meinâ
"eager to go, desiring to start" comes from a stem MEN "go" (VT39:11). (Apparently this word could also be
used as a verb "desire to go in some direction, make for it, have some end in view"; this is at least true for its
Quenya descendant mína-.) Other examples are found in Quenya: maita "hungry" from the stem MAT "eat",
and soica "thirsty" from SOK "gulp, quaff, drink" (primitive *maitâ, *soikâ, my reconstructions). See
VT39:11.
- Lengthening of stem-vowel, e.g. khîmâ "sticky, viscous" from KHIM, râba "wild, untamed" from
RAB, dâla "flat" from DAL.
- Stem-vowel prefixed: askarâ "tearing, hastening" from SKAR "tear, rend" (in effect, askarâ becomes
a kind of participle).
Nouns in -â display much the same variation; in most cases, such nouns denote inanimate things. Some
are derived by simple suffixation, e.g. wedâ "bond" (WED) or golbâ "branch" (GÓLOB). Some show nasal
infixion: kwentâ "tale" (from KWET "speak"), randâ "cycle, age" (RAD), kwingâ "bow" (KWIG). We also
note cases where the stem-vowel is lengthened, such as râmâ "wing" from RAM or kânâ "outcry, clamour"
from KAN (see PM:361-362 for the latter example). Doubling of the final consonant in the stem is also found:
rattâ, ratta "course, river-bed" from RAT, gassâ "hole, gap" from GAS. The word ankâ "jaw, row of teeth"
is based on a rearranged form of the stem NAK "bite"; Tolkien actually wrote "an-kâ" as if to emphasize that
the middle vowel was lost. Whether the final -â is an independent ending or just the stem-vowel suffixed and
lengthened is difficult to say. The similar formation OKTÂ "war" from KOT "strive, quarrel" clearly displays
an independent ending -â, since the stem-vowel is here O.
16 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
As noted above, there are many verbs showing final A, but then as part of the longer endings - tâ or -jâ.
The simple ending -a, -â is very rare on verbs. We note olsa- "to dream" from the stem ÓLOS. Long -â
combined with medial fortification M > MB occurs in tambâ "to knock" (TAM); the final -â is marked as
accented. So is the final vowel of battâ "trample", with the "medial consonant [of the stem BAT, *BATA]
lengthened in frequentative formation".
In some verbal stems, the final -a is quite clearly just the stem-vowel repeated, for instance stama-
"bar, exclude" (UT:282) or glada "laugh" (PM:359). They are therefore irrelevant here.
The suffix -dô is a (usually agental) ending that is preferred in the case of stems ending in N: ñgandô
*"harper" from ÑGAN/ÑGANAD and lindô "singer" from LIN2. (In the latter entry in the Etymologies, only
the later Quenya form lindo is listed, but the archaic form lindô is given as part of the compound tuilelindô
"swallow", etymologically "spring-singer", in the entry TUY. Ñgandô is likewise attested only as a part of the
word tjalañgandô "harp-player"; see TYAL, ÑGAN/ÑGANAD.) There is also the word ndandô "Nando,
Green-elf", interpreted "one who goes back on his word or decision" (the Nandor were so called because they
left the march from Cuiviénen; the stem DAN-, NDAN- indicates "the reversal of an action, so as to undo or
nullify its effect", WJ:412). In ñgolodô "Noldo" (WJ:364, 380), the ending -dô follows the reduplicated
stem-vowel (ómataina) of the stem ÑGOL. In this word, -dô apparently does not have any agental meaning;
it is simply a personal (masculine) suffix, indicating one that has the property denoted by the stem ÑGOL
(wise, wisdom).
The Common Eldarin word rondô "vaulted roof" does not contain the ending -dô; this is the stem
RONO (not in Etym) with medial fortification n > nd (VT39:9, cf. WJ:414). Indeed we cannot be sure that
words like lindô are not derived from LIN by means of a similar fortification and the simpler ending -ô (see
below). The question does not have much practical interest.
The ending -dô also appear in a nasal-infixed form -ndo or -ndô. In the word ulgundô "monster,
deformed and hideous creature" from ÚLUG it does not seem to be agental, but is simply used to form a
noun. In the words kalrondô "hero" (from KAL "shine") and lansrondo, lasrondo "hearer, listener,
eavesdropper" (from LAS2 "listen"), the ending -ndo, -ndô seems to be suffixed to another masculine ending,
-rô/-ro (see below). Tolkien actually wrote "lansro-ndo, lasro-ndo" to make this clear. See also - ondô.
As the feminine counterpart of -dô we would expect -dê, and this ending may be attested in asmalindê
"yellow bird, 'yellow hammer' " (SMAL). The ending -(i)ndê that here occurs may be seen as a nasal-infixed
form of *-dê, paralleling -ndô from -dô. (In Quenya, -ndë can apparently be used of an inanimate as well as a
female agent: cf. ulundë "flood" from ULU "flow".)
The ending -ê, -e has several meanings, or rather a few specialized meanings as well as some very general
ones. A number of words in -ê, -e denote abstract or intangible things; in such cases the stem-vowel is often
lengthened: nêthê "youth" (NETH), ñgôlê "Science/Philosophy" (PM:360), ñôle "odour" (ÑOL), rênê
"remembrance" (PM:372), slîwê "sickness" (SLIW), tûrê "mastery, victory" (TUR). The stem-vowel remains
short in we3ê "manhood, vigour" (WEG), et-kelê "spring, issue of water" (KEL) and naje "lament" (NAY),
while khaimê "habit" shows A-infixion instead of lengthening (KHIM). In the word esdê > ezdê "repose",
the origin of the Quenya name of the Valië Estë, the stem SED occurs in an alternative form ESD- (WJ:403).
For -ê as an abstract ending, compare also the longer endings -mê, -rê, -wê, that are often used to derive
abstract words.
Another group of nouns in -ê denote substances: khjelesê "glass" (KHYEL(ES) ), kjelepê "silver"
(KYELEP), laurê "golden light" (LÁWAR/GLÁWAR), mazgê "dough" (MASAG), rossê "dew, spray"
(Letters:282), slingê "cobweb" (SLIG); srawê "flesh" (MR:350); we may even include mizdê "fine rain"
(MIZD).
A feminine ending -ê, -e is seen in the word tawarê, taware "dryad, spirit of woods" (evidently fem.,
contrast masc. tawarô, tawaro) (TÁWAR). Cf. also bessê "wife" (BES), though this may contain a longer
ending -sê, and the final vowel in the pronoun sê, se "she" (stem S; also sî, si).
A few nouns in -ê denote localities: ndorê "land" (NDOR, WJ:413), taurê "great wood, forest"
17 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
(TÁWAR); we may also add et-kelê "spring, issue of water" already mentioned (KEL).
However, the ending -ê also occurs in many nouns that seem to have nothing in common semantically.
The ending -ê may be used alone (as in spinê "larch" from SPIN, tatharê "willow-tree" from TATHAR), but
more often it is combined with some other manipulation of the stem, such as nasal-infixion (londê "narrow
path" from LOD), lengthening of the stem-vowel (rîgê "crown" from RIG), A-infixion (laibê "ointment"
from LIB2), medial fortifications like M > MB or N > ND (rimbê "crowd, host" from RIM, spindê "tress,
braid of hair" from SPIN) or doubling of the final consonant of the stem (lassê "leaf" from LAS1, b'rittê
"gravel" from BIRÍT). Nîbe "front, face" shows short -e, but the stem-vowel of NIB is lengthened. In some
nouns, the ending -ê, -e may be analyzed as being simply the stem-vowel suffixed and sometimes lengthened,
e.g. in eredê "seed", kjelepê "silver", ndere "bridegroom" (ERÉD, KYELEP, DER/NÊR). Adjectives like
dene "thin and strong, pliant, lithe" (WJ:412) or verbal stems like dele "walk, go, proceed, travel" (WJ:360)
should probably be analyzed in the same way; no actual derivational ending is present. The same is the case
with the noun kwende "Quendë, Elf"; it is derived from the stem KWENE by medial fortification N > ND,
not by any distinct ending -e (WJ:360).
The ending -i occurs in a number of adjectives, many of which are colour-words. In the case of monosyllabic
stems ending in N, it is always combined with the fortification N > ND: slindi "fine, delicate" (SLIN), thindi
"pallid, grey, wan, pale or silvery grey" (THIN, WJ:384), windi "blue-grey, pale blue or grey" (WIN/WIND;
windi was struck out). Ninkwi "white" combines the ending -i with nasal-infixion of the stem NIK-W. On the
other hand, karani "red" (KARÁN) shows no extra modifications, just the ending. Yet another
colour-adjective, lugni "blue" (LUG2), seems to contain a longer ending -ni that is attested in this word only.
In ringi "cold" the ending may be the stem-vowel suffixed. Mori is stated to be both the adjective "dark" and
the abstract "darkness" (Letters:382; in the Etymologies, stem MOR, the gloss is simply "black"). This brings
us over to nouns in -i. Some are abstract, such as rinki "flourish, quick shake" (RIK(H), note nasal-infixion).
The word etsiri "mouth of a river" is in origin plainly the abstract "outflow(ing)" (ET, compare SIR). A few
nouns in -i refer to periods of time: ari "day" (AR1) and dômi- "twilight" (DOMO).
Some few denote substances: g-lisi "honey" (LIS) and pori "flour, meal" (POR); khîthi "mist, fog"
may also be seen as a substance (KHIS/KHITH). In light of this, may liñwi "fish" (LIW, note nasal-infixion)
be "fish" as a substance, as food, rather than "fish" as an animal? Only one word in - i refers to a single,
concrete, tangible object: phini "a single hair" (PM:362 - this word is stated to be Common Eldarin rather
than Primitive Quendian). In several of the examples above, including phini, the "ending" may also be the
stem-vowel suffixed (but obviously not in ari, dômi-, pori).
A feminine ending -î is seen in the two words Barathî (BARATH), an early name of Varda, and in târî
"queen" (wife of a târo, "king"). The word târî is probably formed after târo, since there is no R in the stem
TA/TA3 and the feminine equivalent of the masculine ending -rô, -ro seems to be properly -rê (as in weirê
"weaver", WEY), not *-rî. For -î as a feminine element, cf. also the pronoun sî, si "she" (stem S; also sê, se).
(Note, however, that Tolkien later implied another etymology for Quenya Vairë; see weirê in the wordlist
below.)
The -î of the word îdî "heart, desire, wish" seems to be unconnected (an abstract ending, or just the
stem-vowel suffixed, or even a misreading for *îdê as the Quenya form írë may suggest?) The stem ID is not
defined.
An abstract/infinitive ending -ie is found in Quenya and Old Sindarin, and we would expect it to correspond
to something like -iê in the primitive language. This ending may be attested in the word luktiênê
"enchantress" (LUK), if this is *luktiê "enchantment" + the feminine ending -nê, hence
*"enchantment-female". *Luktiê would be an abstract or verbal noun formed from *luktâ- "enchant" (my
reconstruction, cf. Quenya luhta-).
In gwa-lassiê "collection of leaves, foliage" from lassê "leaf", the ending -iê + the prefix gwa-
"together" is used to form a collective (Letters:282).
18 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
An adjectival ending -imâ occurs in the word silimâ "shining white", "silver" (as adj.) (SIL). This would be
the origin of the Quenya adjectival ending -ima (often meaning "-able", but sometimes used in a more
general sense). Alternatively we would have to explain silimâ as including the ómataina-form of SIL, namely
*SILI, followed by the ending -mâ; see below. But this ending is typically used to derive words for
implements and is found on no (other) adjective, so it is better to assume an ending -imâ.
The feminine ending -ittâ is mentioned in PM:345; this is the origin of Sindarin -eth. See also -otta, -otto.
The ending -jâ, -ja, -iâ, -ia has several meanings. It occurs on a number of adjectives: banjâ "beautiful"
(BAN), erjâ "isolated, lonely" (VT42:4), kalarjâ "brilliant" (KAL), miniia "single, distinct, unique" (MINI),
oijâ "everlasting" (OY), slinjâ "lean, thin, meagre" (SLIN), windiâ "pale blue" (WIN/WIND - it is uncertain
whether Tolkien rejected the word windiâ or not). Wanjâ "fair, beautiful" is called an "adjectival
derivative...from the stem WAN" in WJ:383, and Tolkien explicitly referred to -ja as a Common Eldarin
adjectival element (VT42:10). It also occurs in some ordinals that are said to be Common Eldarin: lepenja
"fifth", otsôja "seventh" (VT42:26, 25). The word kwendjâ, the origin of Quenya, is explained as being an
adjective meaning "belonging to the *kwendî, to the people as a whole" (WJ:360, 393). May this wording
suggest that kwendjâ comes from *kwendî-â, sc. the plural form kwendî "Elves" + the adjectival ending -â?
The verbal ending -jâ, -ja, -iâ is attested in the words barjâ- "to protect" (BAR), berja- "to dare"
(BER), beujâ- "follow, serve" (BEW), ramja- "fly, sail; wander" (RAM), tjaliâ- "to play" (TYAL), uljâ "it is
raining" (ULU). In the Etymologies, the word barjâ has a diacritic indicating that the ending -jâ (or its final
vowel) was accented (BAR). But we cannot conclude that this is always the case; berja "to dare" is marked as
accented on the first syllable. (Adjectival -jâ is apparently not accented; cf. banjâ "beautiful".)
There are only a few nouns in -jâ, -ja: galjâ "bright light" (KAL), gilja "star" (GIL), kegjâ "hedge"
(UT:282), talrunja "sole of foot" (TALAM, RUN). Tolkien struck out winjâ "evening" (WIN/WIND). Wanjâ
"Vanya" (Quenya pl. Vanyar, the first clan of the Eldar) is really an adjective "fair, beautiful", as noted above
(WJ:380, 383). Tolkien also reconstructed the primitive form of Vanya as banjâ (BAN; cf. pl. "Banyai" in
PM:402).
Another adjectival ending is -kâ. In Letters:282, Tolkien mentions a "basis" LAY (also present in Quenya
lairë "summer") that yields laikâ "green". Other examples include gajakâ "fell, terrible, dire" (PM:363),
poikâ "clean, pure" (POY), tiukâ "thick, fat" (TIW); later -kâ became short -ka as in lauka "warm" (LAW).
The ending -kô, attested only in the word tiukô "thigh" (TIW), would seem to be a nominalized form of -kâ
(tiukâ "thick" > tiukô *"thick thing" = "thigh").
The ending -la seems to mean little more than "thing" (or "person"); it is used as a noun-former. Tolkien
defines hekla as "any thing (or person) put aside from, or left out from, its normal company" (WJ:361; stem
HEKE "aside, apart"); this could be turned into a "personal form" heklô "waif or outcast" with the masculine
ending -ô; see below. (There is also an adjectival form heklâ formed with the adjectival ending -â, discussed
above.) In the Etymologies, -la is found in the names of a number of implements where the ending -mâ (see
below) could presumably have been used as well: makla "sword" from MAK "sword, fight with sword",
tekla "pen" from TEK "write" (hence *"thing for writing"), and, with a nasal-infixed stem, tankla "pin,
brooch" from TAK "fix, make fast". In the word magla (read *smaglâ?) "stain" from the stem SMAG- "[?to]
soil, stain" the ending simply acts as a noun-former. (In the Etymologies, the Sindarin word mael that is
referred to magla is glossed both "stain" as a noun and adj. "stained", but the adjective "stained" is
presumably derived from *(s)maglâ with adjectival -â.) In one case, the ending -la is added, not directly to
the root, but to another derived word: Sjatsela/sjatsêla "broadsword-blade", "axe-blade" includes the word
sjatsê < sjadsê "cleft, gash" derived from the root SYAD "shear through, clear"; a sjatsêla is thus a *"thing
used for making gashes".
The adjective ndulla "dark, dusky, obscure" may not contain the ending -la; it is apparently formed
from the root NDUL by "strengthening" the final consonant to double LL and adding the adjectival ending -â.
Indeed the form in PQ and CE must have been *ndullâ with a long final vowel, for primitive ndulla would
19 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
have yielded Quenya **nul (null-), but the actual Quenya form is nulla. Ndulla must be understood as being
ancient Quenya (after the shortening of the original long final vowels) rather than primitive Elvish.
The ending -la combined with the adjectival suffix -â produces -lâ, as in heklâ mentioned above. This
-lâ would seem to be the origin of the Quenya participial ending -la, Sindarin -l.
The ending -lê is used to derive nouns that "seem properly to have been universal or abstract" (VT39:16); this
also goes for its direct Quenya descendant -lë. In most attested examples it simply acts as a verbal noun
ending. The root TUY "spring, sprout" yields tuilê "day-spring" or "spring-time"; the basic meaning would be
simply *"springing, sprouting". Keglê comes from keg- "snag, barb" and would mean basically *"snagging,
barbing", but abstracts often take on a concrete meaning, and in Sindarin cail (< keglê) means "fence" or
"palisade" (UT:282).
The -rille of silimarille "Silmaril" may be a verbal noun derived from RIL "glitter", so that rille means
something like *"radiance, brilliance".
The -le of nenle "brook" (NEN) may or may not be connected; if it is, the word would mean
"watering". But this -le may also be a diminutive ending.
How does ramalê "pinion, great wing (of eagle)" fit in? (RAM)
The suffix -mâ is one of the most productive endings. Tolkien points out that this suffix is frequent in the
names of implements (WJ:416). Hence the stem TAK "fix, make fast" may yield takmâ "thing for fixing", the
origin of Quenya tangwa "hasp, clasp". SUK "drink" yields sukmâ "drinking-vessel". Another word of the
same meaning, julmâ, is likewise derived from a stem meaning "drink" (WJ:416 - this is the origin of
Quenya yulma "cup", known from Namárië). From the stem YAT "join" comes jatmâ, apparently meaning
"bridge" or "joining" (Quenya yanwë). Note that the stem to which -mâ (-ma) is appended is not required to
have a verbal meaning; kasma "helmet" comes from a stem KAS "head". Telmâ "hood, covering" comes
from a stem (TEL/TELU) that is not defined, but apparently has to do with the top or canopy of something.
(In the Etymologies, the final vowel of telmâ has a diacritic denoting that it may be either long or short, so
the variation -mâ vs. -ma is unimportant.)
Some "implements" may even be body parts, such as nakma "jaw" from NAK "bite", or labmâ
"tongue" from LABA "lick" (WJ:416).
However, not all words in -mâ denote implements. Often the meaning of the ending -mâ is very
general; it simply denotes an object somehow connected with the state or action denoted by the stem. Parmâ
"book" comes from a stem PAR "compose, put together"; a parmâ is simply a "thing that is composed or put
together". Sometimes -mâ denotes an impersonal agent, as in tuimâ "a sprout, bud" from TUY "spring,
sprout" or tjulmâ "mast" from TYUL "stand up" (but in SD:419, the primitive form of Quenya tyulma is
reconstructed as kjulumâ instead). In some cases, -mâ is used simply to derive concrete nouns, as in pathmâ
"level space, sward" or sjalmâ "shell, conch, horn of Ulmo" (stems PATH, SYAL not defined). Similarly,
skelmâ "skin, fell" comes from a stem SKEL that is not clearly glossed; it may mean "strip, strip bare" (cf.
SKAL1). Quenya corma "ring" plainly represents a primitive form *kormâ (not reconstructed by Tolkien);
the stem KOR means "round", so a *kormâ is simply a "round thing".
Infrequently the ending -mâ may also denote a substance, as in wilmâ "air, lower air" from the stem
WIL "fly, float in air", or sagmâ "poison" from SAG (stem meaning not given; perhaps "bitter").
The ending -mâ also seems to occur in one adjective, silimâ "shining white", "silver" (as adj.) (SIL).
But this is probably a longer adjectival ending -imâ; see above.
The ending -mê is properly an abstract or verbal noun ending, much like English "-ing", as in julmê
"drinking, carousal", from the stem JULU "drink" (WJ:416) or labmê "the action of *LABA", sc. a stem
having to do with licking or moving the tongue (WJ:416). The name of the Vala Oromë is really adapted
from Valarin (an early Eldarin form was Arâmê), but in later ages the Eldar took the name to mean
"horn-blowing", wrongly supposing that it contained the verbal noun ending - mê (WJ:400).
A number of other words are easily explained as abstract words that have taken on a more concrete
meaning, as such words often do: rakmê "fathom" from RAK "stretch out, reach", tekmê "letter, symbol"
20 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
from TEK "make a mark", tinmê "sparkle, glint" from TIN "to sparkle", tulukmê "support, prop" from
TULUK (stem not defined but having to do with being firm or steadfast). Note that English "support" may
have both an abstract and a concrete meaning (the act of supporting vs. a tangible prop), illustrating how
abstracts and concretes are easily conflated. In one case, the ending - mê seems to be confused with -mâ; both
telmâ and telmê (or telma, telme) "hood, covering" are mentioned by Tolkien when he etymologizes
Quenya telmë "hood" (TEL/TELU). Once again, a full abstract "covering" takes on a concrete meaning: a
hood, that should more properly be called a telmâ with the ending for implements.
In a few cases, the ending -mê/-me occurs in the names of substances: khithme "fog" (KHIS/KHITH),
silimê "light of Silpion", also a poetic word for "silver" (SIL; this may actually be a nominalized form of the
apparently adjectival ending seen in silimâ; see -imâ). In one word -mê simply denotes something
intangible: do3mê "night" (DO3, see DOMO).
The agental ending -mô is attested in the word Ulumô "Pourer, Ulmo" only (ULU). However, its Quenya
descendant -mo is well attested and is stated to be an ending that "often appeared in names or titles,
sometimes with an agental significance" (WJ:400; here "the Pourer" as the meaning of Ulmo is said to be an
Elvish folk etymology, for the name was actually adopted and adapted from Valarin Ul(l)ubôz).
The ending -nâ (-na) is very productive. In a few cases (khalnâ, barnâ under KHAL2, BAR) the final vowel
is marked as accented; perhaps this ending received the accent in primitive Elvish. Its function is to form
adjectives: In UT:266, a word in -nâ is called as an "ancient adjectival form", while in WJ:365 another such
word, heklanâ, is called an "extended adjectival form" (extended as compared to the shorter adjectival form
heklâ, presumably). Examples include ku3nâ "bowed, bow-shaped, bent" (KU3 "bow"), magnâ "skilled"
(MAG, under MA3), ndeuna "second" (NDEW "follow, come behind"), ornâ "uprising, tall" (UT:266),
patnâ "wide" (PAT), pathnâ "smooth" (PATH), ragnâ "crooked" (RAG), sarnâ "of stone" (SAR, see STAR),
ta3na ?"high, lofty, noble" (TÂ/TA3), tubnâ "deep" (TUB). This ending may well be added to stems that
already have an adjectival meaning, such as k'rannâ "ruddy (of face)" from KARÁN "red" or mornâ "dark"
from MOR "black" (see Letters:382 for mornâ; this derivative is not given in the Etymologies, though its
Quenya descendant morna is).
Sometimes the ending -nâ (-na) produces forms that may be considered past participles, as when DUL
"hide, conceal" yields ndulna "secret" (or *"hidden, concealed"). Gjernâ "old, worn" may be seen as a past
participle if the stem GYER means "to wear (out)", like a Quenya verbal derivative of this stem (yerya) does.
Likewise, skelnâ "naked" comes from a stem (SKEL) that may mean "strip bare" (cf. SKAL1 ). Clearly
participial are the forms skalnâ "veiled, hidden, shadowed, shady" from SKAL1 "screen, hide (from light)",
skarnâ "wounded" from SKAR "tear, rend", and barnâ "safe, protected, secure" from BAR "uplift, save,
rescue". We also note wannâ "departed, dead" from WAN "depart, go away, disappear, vanish" and khalnâ
"noble, exalted" from KHAL2 "uplift". Lebnâ "left behind" would seem to be a past participle from its gloss,
but surprisingly the stem LEB/LEM does not mean "leave behind"; it is glossed "stay, stick, adhere, remain,
tarry".
In a few cases, words in -nâ are used as nouns rather than adjectives, like staknâ "cleft, split". This
would be a past participle used as a noun; the stem STAK is glossed "split, insert". There is also the original
form of Lindon, Lindânâ; the name refers to the Lindarin (Telerin) Green-elves that settled there (WJ:385).
Lindânâ would mean simply "Lindarin [Area]". The word ramna "wing (horn), extended point at side, etc."
doesn't quite fit in; it is derived from a stem already meaning "wing" and must be seen simply as a variant
(RAM).
A longer form -inâ, -ina is found in a few words: smalinâ "yellow" (SMAL), Bedûina ("Bedû-ina") "of
the Spouses" (Bedû, Aulë and Yavanna; see LEP/LEPEN/LEPEK), ngolwina "wise, learned in deep arts"
(ÑGOL). In the case of ngolwina, the ending is not added directly to the stem ÑGOL, but to *ngolwê (my
reconstruction), the origin of Quenya nolwë "wisdom, secret lore".
The word luktiênê "enchantress" (LUK), the primitive form of Lúthien, seems to contain a feminine ending
21 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
-nê. It would be the counterpart of masculine -nô; see below. It is apparently suffixed to a noun *luktiê
"enchantment" rather than directly to a verbal stem. A distinct ending -nê occurs in ornê "(slender) tree",
stated to be related to the adjective ornâ "uprising, tall" (UT:266). In this word, -nê would seem to be a
nominal ending corresponding to adjectival -nâ, an ornê being literally a "tall thing", used with reference to
slender trees. How slignê "cobweb" fits in is difficult to say, since Tolkien did not define the stem SLIG. In
neinê "tear", the ending -nê adds nothing to the meaning of the stem NEI "tear" and must be seen simply as a
nominal ending.
The suffix -nô is a masculine ending. It occurs in bernô "man" and besnô "husband" (BES, cf. BER). Since
the stem BES means "wed", besnô "husband" might be interpreted *"bridegroom", if we assign an agental
meaning to -nô. It is clearly agental in khalatirnô "fish-watcher": stem TIR "watch, guard". (In the
Etymologies, the final vowel of khalatirnô has a diacritic indicating that it may be either long or short: -nô
or -no.) Cf. also stabnô "carpenter, wright, builder" from STAB (also stabrô, so the endings -nô and -rô are
sometimes interchangeable). In some cases, -nô denotes impersonal agents, like sjadnô "cleaver" = sword
from SYAD "shear through, cleave". In adnô "gate" the ending does not add any meaning to the stem AD
"entrance, gate".
The ending -ô, -o is predominantly a masculine ending; compare the pronoun sô/so "he" (stem S, also sû/su).
The ending -ô seems to correspond to feminine -ê just like the masculine ending -û corresponds to feminine
-î. Often -ô is seen to have an agental meaning: Kânô "crier, herald" from KAN "cry" (PM:362, 361, 352),
mâlô "friend" from MEL "love as friend" (Tolkien comments on the irregular vocalism E > A), ndâkô
"warrior, soldier" from NDAK "slay", tanô "craftsman, smith" from TAN, "make, fashion", tûrô "master,
victor, lord" from TUR "[have] power, control". (According to PM:362, kânô is an example of "the older and
simplest agental form".) Except in tanô, the vowel of the stem is lengthened (cf. also delô below).
Sometimes the stem is manipulated in other ways when -ô is added. Nasal-infixion is seen in ronjô "chaser"
= hound of chase (ROY1 "chase") and sjandô "cleaver" = sword (SYAD "cleave"; sjandô may also be a
metathesized form of sjadnô). In raukô, a Common Eldarin word applied to "the larger and more terrible of
the enemy shapes" known to the first Elves, the stem RUKU is A-infixed (WJ:390). Whether raukô can be
considered an agental formation is uncertain and perhaps doubtful (RUKU has to do with fear; Tolkien
defines Quenya rauco as "very terrible creature" in VT39:10). In the Primitive Quendian word edelô "one
who goes, traveller, migrant" the stem-vowel (sundóma) is prefixed; cf. the stem DELE "go, travel"
(WJ:360). The simpler variant delô, delo is seen in the Common Eldarin words awa-delo, awâ-delo (also
?wâ-delô) *"Away-goer", a name made in Beleriand for those who finally departed from Middle-earth
(WJ:360). Edelô "traveller" also has a possible variant edlô "with loss of sundóma" (WJ:363, 364). Of
course, the stem-vowel isn't really "lost", but the consonant-vowel-consonant structure of the stem is
rearranged to vowel-consonant-consonant (EDL for DEL).
In some words -ô, -o has no agental meaning, but is simply a masculine ending: urkô ?"Orc"
(WJ:390), ndêro "bridegroom" (NDER, strengthened form of DER "man"), wegô "man" (WEG "manly
vigour"), berô "valiant man, warrior" (BER "valiant"; under BES berô is simply glossed "man"),
tawarô/tawaro "dryad, spirit of woods" (evidently masc.; fem. tawarê/taware) (TÁWAR "wood, forest").
We also note iondo "son" (mentioned under SEL-D; read *jondo?), clearly derived from YON with medial
fortification n > nd and the masculine ending -o.
The ending -ô also occurs in the names of some animals: rokkô "horse" (Letters:282, 382, stem ROK
given in the Etymologies) and morokô "bear" (MORÓK); we may include ûbanô "monster" (BAN). Whether
we should insist that such words are exclusively masculine we cannot know. Since -ô corresponds to
feminine -ê, a she-bear may explicitly be a *morokê, while a mare is a *rokkê. Similarly, an *urkê would
be a female Orc (never seen, never mentioned and never heard of, but according to Silm. ch. 3 "the Orcs had
life and multiplied after the manner of the Children of Ilúvatar", so Orc-women must have existed!) But
words like morokô, rokkô and ûbanô can probably be used with generic reference, irrespective of sex.
Only rarely is -o, -ô used to derive words denoting inanimate things with no agental meaning. We note
22 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
daio "shade, shadow cast by any object" (DAY "shadow"), panô "plank, fixed board, especially in a floor"
(PAN "place, set, fix in place (especially of wood)"), tinkô "metal" (TINKÔ is the head of an entry in the
Etymologies, but it seems to be a complete word and not just a "stem"). Abstracts in -ô are very rare indeed;
we note mbandô "custody, safe-keeping" (MR:350) and alâkô "rush, rushing flight, wild wind (ÁLAK; "wild
wind" is at least relatively concrete). In the words lokko "ringlet" (LOKH), ndôro "land or region" (WJ:413),
rondô "a vaulted or arched roof" (WJ:414), ostô (CE) "fortress, stronghold" and tollo "island" (TOL2), the
final vowel is probably just the stem-vowel suffixed. This is also the case in verbal stems like groto "dig,
excavate, tunnel", rono "arch over, roof in" or soto "shelter, protect, defend" (WJ:414).
Yet another masculine ending, -ondô, is seen in stalgondô "hero, dauntless man" (STÁLAG). In kalrondô
"hero" (KAL) it seems to be combined with the masculine ending -ro. An old form of Sauron is given (in
Letters:380) as thaurond-. The hyphen indicates that the word is not complete; we must assume that the full
form would be *thaurondô. This -ondô is evidently just a longer form of -dô, see above (cf. the feminine
ending -indê, apparently paralleling an unattested shorter form *-dê).
The endings -otto, -otta may be observed in the Tolkien's suggested reconstructions of the primitive form of
Sindarin nogoth "dwarf": nukotto, nukotta "a stunted or ill-shapen thing (or person)" (WJ:413). These
endings simply denote someone or something that has the properties described by the stem (in this case
NUKU "stunted", WJ:413). Compare the -tt- seen in kwelett- "corpse" from KWEL "fade, wither". The word
would mean literally *"faded/withered/dead one"; its full form may be *kweletto or *kweletta. The feminine
ending -ittâ mentioned in PM:345 may be related to these other double-T endings.
The ending -râ is a fairly productive adjectival suffix: wa3râ "soiled, dirty" (WA3), târâ "lofty" (TÂ/TA3, cf.
TÁWAR), ubrâ "abundant" (UB), magrâ "useful, fit, good (of things)" (MAG, under MA3), mikrâ
"sharp-pointed" (WJ:337), sagrâ "bitter" (SAG), nethrâ, nethra "young" (NETH), gairâ "awful, fearful"
(WJ:400), akrâ "narrow" (AK), teñrâ "straight, right" (TEÑ, TE3), gaisrâ "dreadful" (GÁYAS), taurâ
"masterful, mighty" (TUR, TÂ/TA3, cf TÁWAR), nûrâ "deep" (NÛ). Letters:380 gives thaurâ "detestable",
said to be derived from a stem THAW (not in Etym). A special case is the adjective katwârâ "shapely", that
seems to have two adjectival endings added to the stem KAT, first -wâ and then -râ. Short -ra in lakra "swift,
rapid" (LAK2) and daira "large, great" (VT42:11, base given as DAY); cf. also nethra beside nethrâ.
The ending -rê seems to have several meanings. It functions as an abstract ending in the two words idrê
"thoughtfulness" (ID) and thêrê "look, face, expression" (THÊ). On the other hand, it is a collective ending in
the word nôrê "family, tribe or group having a common ancestry" (WJ:413); it would be the ancestor of the
collective ending -rë known from Quenya. The stem WEY "wind, weave" gives weirê "weaver" as the
original form of the Quenya name of the Valië Vairë; this -rê is plainly an agentive suffix, evidently the
feminine counterpart of masculine -rô. In the word stalrê "steep, falling" (STAL) -rê seems to function as an
adjectival ending (may this be a misreading for *stalrâ, with a well attested adjectival suffix?)
Is the ending -re in balâre, the archaic form of the name of the island Balar at Sirion's mouth (BAL),
somehow connected to any of these -rê's?
Words with the ending -rô, -ro are identified by Tolkien as agental formations (WJ:371 - here he also
mentions a form -rdo, that is nowhere attested). In WJ:371, Quenya Avar (pl. Avari) is said to go back on a
primitive form abaro, derived from a stem ABA having to do with refusal. The Etymologies agrees quite well
with this; most words in -rô and -ro are indeed seen to have an agental meaning: beurô "follower, vassal"
from BEW "follow, serve", onrô or ontâro "begetter, parent" from ONO "beget", ndeuro "follower,
successor" from NDEW "follow, come behind". Stabrô "carpenter, wright, builder" is seen to have an agental
meaning, though the stem STAB is not glossed. Tolkien states that tamrô "woodpecker" means literally
"knocker", from TAM "knock". Another animal name, njadrô "rat", literally means *"gnawer" (NYAD
"gnaw").
23 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
Tolkien notes in WJ:371 that while the short form -ro is used after a suffixed stem-vowel (ómataina),
as in abaro, the long form -rô may be added directly to the stem "with or without n-infixion". But the only
nasal-infixed word with this ending that occurs in the Etymologies, kwentro "narrator" from KWET "speak",
shows the short form -ro. (Perhaps we should indeed read *kwentrô since the Quenya descendant quentaro
shows -o, while an original short final -o would have been lost at the Common Eldarin stage.) We may also
throw in lansrondo from LAS2; this -rondo seems to be -ro + another masculine ending (also in kalrondô
"hero"; see -ndô under -dô, and -ondô).
In a few words, -rô, -ro functions simply as a masculine ending and has no agental significance. Cf.
târo "king" from TÂ/TA3 "high, lofty, noble". Kalrô "noble man, hero" is a doubtful case, but perhaps it
means literally "shining one" (KAL "shine").
The masculine ending -rô apparently has a feminine counterpart -rê, as in weirê "weaver" (WEY).
An apparently adjectival ending -sâ occurs in the word neresâ. This is said to be a "feminine adjectival
formation" from NER "man", meaning "she that has manlike valour or strength" (WJ:416). This particular
ending does not seem to be attested anywhere else; neither did Tolkien explain precisely how this adjective
can be considered "feminine". Perhaps we are to assume a stem *NERES as a "feminine" variant of NER
"man", to which the normal adjectival ending -â is added. The double stem THEL, THELES "sister" in
LR:392 may suggest that extended stems in -S may sometimes be typically "feminine" (though there are other
examples of such extensions in -S that clearly have nothing to do with gender).
An ending -sê occurs in a number of words, but it seems to have several meanings. In some words it
apparently denotes something that is made by the action denoted by the stem: khotsê "assembly" from
KHOTH "gather", sjadsê (later sjatsê) "cleft, gash" from SYAD "shear through, cleave", wahsê "stain" from
WA3 "[to] stain, soil". We may add b'ras-sê "heat" if the undefined stem BARÁS means something like
"burn" or "heat up" (it yields words for "hot, burning, fiery"). Does khjelesê "glass" fit in somehow, or does
the S belong to the stem, that Tolkien confusingly listed as KHYEL(ES)? It could be an "expanded" form of a
shorter stem *KHYEL. A few words indicate that -sê may also be used to derive words for implements (taksê
"nail" from TAK "make fast") or constructions (tupsê "thatch" from TUP, not defined). A distinct feminine
ending -sê seems to occur in a few words, such as ndîse "bride"; this might seem to be the stem NDIS with
the feminine ending -e, but the Etymologies lists a sub-entry NDIS-SÊ/SÂ that seems to indicate that an
ending -sê really is present. Does this ending occur in bessê "wife", or is the double S simply the final
consonant of the stem BES doubled? The latter is almost certainly the case in the words khrassê "precipice"
(KHARÁS), kwessê "feather" (KWES), lassê "leaf" or "ear" (LAS1, cf. Letters:282) and risse- "a ravine"
(RIS). But what about the long ending -ssê in tjulussê "poplar-tree", added to an ómataina-form of the stem
TYUL? Some Quenya nouns also show the ending -ssë, e.g. hopassë "harbourage" (KHOP) - for *khôpassê?
The ending -stâ would seem to be basically a verbal noun ending; Sindarin haust "bed" is said to derive from
khau-stâ, literally "rest-ing" (KHAW).
The ending -tâ, -ta is in most cases a verbal suffix. Most verbs in -ta are clearly transitive: anta- "to present,
give" (ANA1), bâta "ban, prohibit" (WJ:372), ektâ "prick with a sharp point, stab" (WJ:365), hektâ "set
aside, cast out, forsake" (WJ:361; hekta, WJ:365), k'riktâ "reap" (KIRIK), ma3tâ (> Common Eldarin
mahtâ-) "to handle" (MA3), maktâ "wield a weapon" (MAK), rista- "cut" (RIS), skelta- "strip" (SKEL),
wahtâ- "to soil, stain" (WA3). Wedtâ "swear" (to do something) was struck out (WED). In one verb, the
ending -tâ takes on a causative meaning: tultâ- "make come" from tul- "come" (TUL). The verb nuktâ-
"stunt, prevent from coming to completion, stop short, not allow to continue" may also be seen as a causative
form of the stem NUKU "stunted" (WJ:413). Some ta-verbs are intransitive, though: swesta- "to puff"
(SWES) and b'rekta- "break out suddenly" (BERÉK). There was also winta- "fade" (WIN/WIND), but
Tolkien struck it out.
There are only a few nouns in -tâ, -ta. We note sjadta "axe-stroke" (SYAD), bestâ "matrimony" (BES),
24 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
The ending -tê in kirtê "cutting", the origin of Sindarin certh "rune", seems to denote something that is made
by the action denoted by the stem (here obviously KIR "cut", though this stem is not listed in Etym). Tolkien
calls kirtê "a verbal derivative" and adds that it was of a type not used in Quenya, apparently meaning that
no Quenya words contain a descendant of the ending -tê, or that no such descendant is productive in that
language (WJ:396). Another possible example of the same ending is provided by the word wahtê "a stain",
evidently Common Eldarin for Primitive Quendian *wa3tê, since the stem is WA3 (LR:397). If we take
Tolkien's glosses to WA3 - "stain, soil" - as verbs rather than nouns, wahtê has much the same semantical
relationship to its root WA3 as kirtê has to KIR. Interestingly, Quenya vakse (vaxë) "a stain" does not come
from wahtê, but from the synonymous primitive word wahsê with another ending, apparently confirming that
the derivation exemplified by the primitive words in -tê was not used in Quenya.
An adjectival ending -ti or -iti is seen in a few words: ma3iti "handy, skilled" (MA3), neiti- "moist, dewy"
(NEI), phoroti "right" or "north" (PHOR). In the case of phoroti, the adjectival ending may simply be -i
added to *phorot, an extended form (a so-called kalat-stem?) of the basic stem PHOR. The Quenya ending
-itë in adjectives like uruitë "fiery" (UR) is clearly descended from -iti.
The ending -û is a dual suffix, but it also has other meanings. Words in -û, -u are nearly always nouns (rarely
verbs and never adjectives). A masculine ending -û seems to be present in atû "father" (ATA) and kherû
"master" (Letters:282). In kundû "prince", the ending may be the stem-vowel reduplicated, but probably it is
the same ending as in atû, kherû. Cf. also short -u in orku "goblin", Orc (ÓROK). In Tolkien's later
reconstructions of the primitive word for "Orc", such as urk(u) or uruku (WJ:390), the ending -u may just as
well be the stem-vowel suffixed. A masculine ending may be present in rauku, the possible origin of the
final element in Balrog; Tolkien also suggested raukô as a possible reconstruction, and this word
undoubtedly contains a masculine ending (WJ:390). Some words in -u denote body parts: mbundu "snout,
nose, cape" (MBUD), ranku "arm" (RAK), tûgu "muscle, sinew" (TUG). Note nasal infixion in mbundu,
ranku. Some u-words denote localities: jagu "gulf" (YAG), tumbu "deep valley" (TUB) and tundu "hill,
mound" (TUN); note nasal infixion in tumbu and medial fortification N > ND in tundu. Only one word in -u
denotes a substance: smalu "pollen, yellow powder" (SMAL). In the word tulku "support, prop" (TULUK)
the final -u is probably just the stem-vowel suffixed. The words suglu "goblet" and the name Utubnu, the
primitive form of Utumno, seem to contain endings -lu and -nu not otherwise attested (SUG [see SUK],
TUB).
Among the rare verbal stems in -u we note tel-u, telu "roof in, put the crown on a building". Tolkien
suggested that this is a "differentiated form of *TELE", a stem meaning "close, end, come at the end"
(WJ:411). WJ:417 also mentions a Quenya stem niku- "be chill, cold (of weather)"; it would descend from
*niku- but no further information is given. We need not concern ourselves with stems like ULU "pour, flow"
(LR:396), since the final U is simply the stem-vowel reduplicated and suffixed; compare the short form UL in
WJ:400.
The ending -wâ, -wa is seen to be basically an adjectival suffix. It occurs in several colour-words: khithwa
"grey" (KHIS/KHITH), laikwâ "green" (LÁYAK; laikwa under LAIK), smalwâ "fallow, pale" (SMAL), narwâ
"fiery red" (NAR1 - the long final vowel gives away that this is an archaic form and not Quenya). There is
also the adjective katwâ "shaped, formed" from the stem KAT "shape". If the latter English gloss is to be
understood as a verb rather than a noun, the wâ-formation here functions as a past participle. On the other
25 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
hand, it functions almost like an active participle in terêwâ "piercing, keen" from TER, TERES "pierce".
In one case -wâ turns up in a word stated to be an "adverb and preposition": hekwâ "leaving aside, not
counting, excluding, except" (WJ:365). This is simply an elaboration of an "adverbial element" HEKE,
meaning "aside, apart, separate" (WJ:361).
The ending -wâ also occurs in a couple of bird-names, alkwâ "swan" (ÁLAK) and kukûwâ "dove"
(KÛ). Perhaps these are originally adjectives that were applied to these birds; alkwâ would seem to mean
*"rushing", while kukûwa is obscure (echoic?)
In one case, the ending -wâ is given as part of the head of an entry in the Etymologies. The entry
GENG-WÂ, whence Quenya engwa "sickly", is evidently to be understood as a stem GENG with this ending.
The ending -wê is identified by Tolkien as an abstract suffix (see WEG). It is clearly used to produce verbal
nouns in words like et-kuiwê "awakening" from KUY "awake" or wanwê "death" from WAN "depart";
Tolkien made it clear that wanwê refers to the act of dying, not "death" as a state. Some concrete words in
-wê can be explained as abstract verbal nouns that have taken on a concrete meaning. Atakwê "construction,
building" (TAK) is the best example; compare the English glosses that are properly verbal nouns, but these
words are commonly applied to the structure that is constructed as well as referring to the construction
process itself. Likewise, the word skarwê "wound" from SKAR "tear, rend" must properly refer to the tearing
or rending as an abstract action, but is then applied to a concrete rent. Us(u)kwê "reek, smoke" may properly
be the verbal noun of a stem meaning "to (give out) smoke" (stem USUK not defined). Jagwê "ravine, cleft,
gulf" is likewise in origin a verbal noun derived from YAG "yawn, gape", later applied to a locality. Short -we
is seen in the word tenwe (WJ:394; this seems to be a misprint for *teñwe, since the word is derived from a
stem TEÑ and yielded Quenya tengwë). It means "indication, sign, token", and since the stem TEÑ (not in
Etym) means "indicate, signify", *teñwe is evidently originally just another verbal noun.
In the case of the word uñgwê "gloom", the ending -wê seems simply to denote something intangible
(UÑG). We need not consider Wolwê, the tentative reconstruction of the earlier form of Olwë; Tolkien points
out that this reconstruction is doubtful (PM:357).
The ending -wô is found only in the word nidwô "bolster, cushion". Since the stem NID means "lean
against", X-wô would seem to mean "thing exposed to the action X". This ending could be a nominal
counterpart of the adjectival ending -wâ.
26 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
with the diacritic in question to indicate that it was either long - â or short -a; see the Etymologies, entry
RAT).
It should be noted that in some cases, Tolkien (or possibly the transcriber) seems to have failed to
indicate that a final vowel is long. For instance, ndulla "dark, dusky, obscure" (NDUL) must have been
*ndullâ at the most primitive stage, or it would have yielded Quenya **nul instead of the actual form nulla.
Similarly, there is little reason to doubt that lakra "swift" (LAK) should have been *lakrâ, since the
adjectival ending -râ is attested in a number of other words (and since Quenya larca has not lost the vowel,
only shortened it, while original short final -a was lost in Common Eldarin). Note inconsistencies like laikwâ
(laik-wâ) also appearing in the form laikwa (LAYAK vs. LAIK). It should be remembered that the
Etymologies is actually a quite chaotic document of rough working notes, not a carefully made manuscript
that Tolkien ever intended to publish in this form. Therefore, there is no need to construct overwrought
theories to explain certain apparent irregularities. We may choose to see words like ndulla as later forms,
archaic Quenya, after the shortening of the original long final vowels.
The asterisked form *mad-lî ("honey-eater" = bear) listed under LIS is not included in this wordlist, for
as the lenitions give away, this is archaic Sindarin and not a primitive form. The asterisked form * Goss
"Ossë" that is mentioned under GOS/GOTH is also excluded; this is not an archaic form, but the hypothetical,
unused "Noldorin" cognate of Quenya Ossë ("Noldorin" used Oeros instead). The primitive form yielding
Quenya Ossë and "Noldorin" *Goss would be *Gossê, not mentioned by Tolkien.
Words that were struck out in the Etymologies are bracketed; if the stem itself was struck out, the entire
entry is bracketed.
â imperative particle, independent and variable in place (WJ:365, 371). Cf. heke-â.
-â adjectival ending (WJ:382)
abaro (PQ) "recusant, one who refuses to act as advised or commanded" > CE abar pl. abarî "refuser,
one who declined to follow Oromë" > Quenya Avar, Avari (WJ:371, 361, 380, 411) The Etymologies has
abârô/abâro "refuser, one who does not go forth" (AB/ABAR)
adnô "gate" (AD)
ailin ("ai-lin") "pool, lake" (AY)
aiwê "(small) bird" (AIWÊ is the head of an entry in the Etymologies, but it seems to be a complete
word and not just a "stem")
ajan- "holy" (AYAN)
akâra "made, did", a primitive past tense of KAR, marked as a past tense by the augment, the
reduplicated stem-vowel (WJ:415)
akrâ "narrow" (AK)
akwâ "fully, completely, altogether, wholly" (if = Quenya aqua, the word it yielded) (WJ:392, said to
be an "extension or intensification of *kwâ, used adverbially", WJ:415)
al- (prefix) "no, not" (AR2)
alâkô "rush, rushing flight, wild wind" (ÁLAK)
alkwâ "swan" (ÁLAK, where the spelling is "alk-wâ", but in VT42:7, the form is cited without a
hyphen)
ankâ ("an-kâ") "jaw, row of teeth" (NAK)
anâr- "sun" (ANÁR; be polite and don't ask how Primitive Elvish could have a word for "sun")
andâ "long" (ÁNAD/ANDA); andambundâ "long-snouted" = elephant (MBUD)
angâ (CE) "iron" (PM:347, cf. also ANGÂ in the Etymologies; though this is the head of an entry, it
seems to be a complete word and not just a "stem")
angwa or angu "snake" (the forms ANGWA/ANGU are found in the head of an entry in the
Etymologies, but they seem to be complete words and not just "stems")
anta- "to present, give" (ANA1)
ap-pata "walk behind", on a track or path (PM:387)
27 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
28 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
29 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
30 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
grauk- "a powerful, hostile, and terrible creature", origin of the second element in Quenya Valarauco,
Sindarin Balrog (WJ:415)
grotâ (also rotâ) (CE) "excavation, underground dwelling"; -grota in the compound nâba-grota
(WJ:414). Intensified form grottâ "a large excavation" (WJ:415)
groto "dig, excavate, tunnel" (WJ:414); cf. rot-.
gû "not, un-, in-" (UGU/UMU), prefix gû- (prefix) "no, not" (GÛ)
guldâ "red" (GUL)
guruk- see ruk-
gwa-lassa, gwa-lassiê "collection of leaves, foliage" (Letters:282)
heke (PQ) "apart, not including" (WJ:361); imperative heke-â "be off!" (WJ:365)
hekla (PQ) "any thing (or person) put aside from, or left out from, its normal company"; personal form
heklô "waif or outcast"; adjectival heklâ and hekelâ (WJ:361), extended adjectival form heklanâ (CE)
"Forsaken", the name given by the Sindar to themselves after they were left behind in Beleriand (WJ:365).
hek-tâ (PQ, CE) "set aside, cast out, forsake" (WJ:361; hek-ta, WJ: 365)
hek-wâ adverb and preposition "leaving aside, not counting, excluding, except" (WJ:365)
hjôlâ "trump" (SD:419)
hô, ho adverb "from, coming from", the point of view being outside the thing referred to (WJ:361); -hô
an enclitic that is the origin of the Quenya genitive ending -o (WJ:368)
-î a plural ending, see for instance elen pl. elenî
îdî "heart, desire, wish" (ID)
idrê "thoughtfulness" (ID)
-ikwâ an abjectival ending meaning roughly "-ful" (WJ:412). Also -kwâ.
indise ("i-ndise") intensive form of ndîse > Quenya Indis (NDIS-SÊ/SÂ)
Indo-glaurê (may be primitive Lindarin) (masc. name) (ID)
Indo-klâr (may be primitive Lindarin) (ID)
iondo "son" (SEL-D; read *jondo?)
-ittâ a feminine ending (PM:345)
-ja, adjectival ending (VT42:10)
jagâ "void, abyss" (Letters:383)
jagu "gulf" (YAG)
jagwê "ravine, cleft, gulf" (YAG)
jakta- "neck" (YAK)
jantâ "yoke" (YAT)
jatmâ > Quenya yanwe "bridge, joining, isthmus" (YAT)
jên, jend- "daughter" (YÔ/YON)
jô, jôm "together", of more than two; as prefix jo-, jom- (WJ:361)
julmâ "drinking-vessel" (WJ:416)
julmê "drinking, carousal" (WJ:416)
kala-kwendî "Calaquendi, Light-folk", the Elves that had experienced the Light of Aman (WJ:373)
kalarjâ "brilliant" (KAL)
kala ?"shine", expanded stem kalata- (WJ:392)
kalrô "noble man, hero" (KAL)
kalrondô "hero" (KAL)
kanata, kanatâ, cardinal "four" (VT42:24)
kandâ "bold" (KAN)
kânô "crier, herald"; original form of the ending in Fingon, Turgon (PM:362, 352)
karani "red" (KARÁN)
kassa, kasma ("kas-ma, kas-sa") "helmet" (KAS)
katwâ "shaped, formed" (KAT)
katwârâ "shapely" (KAT)
31 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
32 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
33 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
34 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
Kala-kwendî (WJ:373)
mornâ "dark" (Letters:382)
morokô "bear" (MORÓK)
nâbâ (CE) "hollow"; nâba-grota "hollow underground dwelling" = Novrod, Nogrod (WJ:414)
naje "lament" (NAY)
nakma "jaw" (NAK)
nakt- "biting" (NAY)
ñalatâ (CE) "radiance, glittering reflection" (from jewels, glass, polished metals or water) (PM:347)
narâka "rushing, rapid, violent" (NÁRAK)
narwâ "fiery red" (NAR1; the wording in this entry in Etym may seem to suggest that this is a Quenya
word, but the long final vowel indicates that it is meant to be Primitive Elvish.)
natsai "gore" (This is not the pl. of Sindarin naith, but an archaic pl. form that sg. naith is derived
from.) (SNAS/SNAT)
naukâ adjective "especially applied to things that though in themselves full-grown were smaller or
shorter than their kind, and were hard, twisted or ill-shapen" (WJ:413)
nauþe "imagination" (NOWO; the letter þ represents th as in English thing. This sound apparently did
not occur in the most primitive language [though the aspirate TH did], so nauþe must rather be archaic
Quenya. Cf. also the form of the root, suggesting that at the oldest stage, the initial syllable was * nou- rather
than nau-.)
ndæ^r ("Eld" = CE) "bridegroom". From PQ ndêro. (NDER)
ndâkô "warrior, soldier" (NDAK)
ndan- element "indicating the reversal of an action, so as to undo or nullify its effect, as in 'undo, go
back (the same way), unsay, give back (the same gift: not another in return)' " (WJ:412). Also dan-. Cf.
ndangwetha, ndandô.
ndandô "Nando", interpreted "one who goes back on his word or decision" (the Nandor were so called
because they left the march from Cuiviénen) (WJ:412)
ndangwetha "answer" (noun, may be Old Sindarin), sc. a stem gweth- "report, give account of" with
the prefix ndan-, here simply meaning *"back" (PM:395)
ndere "bridegroom" (DER, NÊR)
ndêro "bridegroom" (NDER)
ndeuna "second" (NDEW)
ndeuro "follower, successor" (NDEW)
ndîse "bride" (NDIS-SÊ/SÂ; ndis under I)
ndorê (PQ) "the hard, dry land as opposed to water or bog" (WJ:413). In the Etymologies defined as
"land, dwelling-place, region where certain people live" (NDOR); this may be the meaning that developed
later. Confused with nôrê.
ndôro "(a particular) land or region" (WJ:413)
ndulla "dark, dusky, obscure" (NDUL)
ndulna "secret" (DUL)
ndûnê "sunset" (NDÛ)
neinê "tear" (NEI)
neiniel- "tearful" (NEI)
neiti- "moist, dewy" (NEI)
nenle ("nen-le") "brook" (NEN)
neñwi "nose" (NEÑ-WI is the head of an entry in the Etymologies, but it seems to be a complete word
and not just a "stem"; the stem may be NEÑ, not given separately)
nere, nêr (probably PQ and CE, respectively) "a male person, a man" (WJ:393)
netere (CE), cardinal "nine" (VT42:27)
nêthê "youth" (NETH)
nethrâ ("neth-râ") "young" (NETH)
35 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
36 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
37 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
38 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
39 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
takmâ "thing for fixing" (> Quenya tangwa "hasp, clasp", Sindarin taew "holder, socket, hasp, clasp,
staple") (TAK)
taksê "nail" (TAK)
talrunja "sole of foot" (TALAM, RUN)
tambâ "to knock" (TAM)
tamrô "woodpecker" (etymologically "knocker") (TAM)
tân-nig element that may be the origin of tani- in Taniqetil (TÂ/TA3)
tankla "pin, brooch" (TAK)
tanô "craftsman, smith" (TAN)
târâ "lofty" (TÂ/TA3, (TÁWAR) )
târa-khil *"high-man" = Númenórean (KHIL)
targâ "tough, stiff" (TÁRAG)
târî "queen" (wife of a târo) (TÂ/TA3)
târo "king" (TÂ/TA3)
tathar, tatharê "willow-tree" (TATHAR)
tathrê "willow-tree" (TATHAR)
taurâ "masterful, mighty" (TUR, (TÁWAR, TÂ/TA3) )
taurê "great wood, forest" (TÁWAR)
tawar "wood" (material) (TÁWAR)
tawarê/taware "dryad, spirit of woods" (evidently fem.) (TÁWAR)
tawarô/tawaro "dryad, spirit of woods" (evidently masc.) (TÁWAR)
[te3ê "path, course, line, direction, way" (TE3)]
tekla "pen" (TEK)
tekmê "letter, symbol" (TEK)
telesâ "rear" (TELES)
telmâ/telma "hood, covering", also telmê/telme (TEL/TELU)
telu, tel-u "roof in, put the crown on a building" (WJ:411)
têñe "line, row" (TEÑ)
teñrâ "straight, right" (TEÑ, TE3)
teñ-wê "sign, token" (VT39:17). Cf. tenwe (WJ:394) (read teñwe? The word is derived from a stem
TEÑ and yielded Quenya tengwë) "indication, sign, token"
terên, terênê "slender" (TER/TERES)
terêwâ "piercing, keen" (TER/TERES)
thandâ "shield" (apparently noun) (UT:282)
thara- "tall (or long) and slender" (WJ:412)
thausâ "foul, evil-smelling, putrid" (THUS)
thaurâ "detestable" (Letters:380; said to be derived from a root THAW. The th of thaurâ is spelt with
a single (Greek) letter in the source.)
thaurond- "Sauron, *Detestable One"; said to be derived from thaurâ, q.v. (Letters:380; the th of
thaurâ and thaurond- is spelt with a single (Greek) letter in the source.)
thêrê "look, face, expression" (THÊ)
thindi "pallid, grey, wan" (THIN), "grey, pale or silvery grey" (WJ:384)
tindômiselde "daughter of twilight", a kenning of the nightingale; = Sindarin Tinúviel. (TIN, SEL-D)
tinkô "metal" (TINKÔ is the head of an entry in the Etymologies, but it seems to be a complete word
and not just a "stem")
tinmê "sparkle, glint" (TIN)
tiukâ "thick, fat" (TIW)
tiukô "thigh" (TIW)
tjalañgandô "harp-player" (TYAL), also tjalañgando with shortening of the final vowel of the final
element of a compound (ÑGAN/ÑGÁNAD)
40 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
41 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34
Primitive Elvish - where it all began http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/primelv.htm
Ardalambion Index
42 of 42 22.09.2004 11:34