Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect Analysis
(FMEA)
AIAG & VDA - 1st Edition
DM or Comment
your Mail-ID to get
VDA-FMEA
Excel Template
✓ FMEA’s have been used as a risk identification and reduction tool for decades.
✓ Developed by the US Military in the late 1940’s.
✓ Used for almost 70 Year’s with relatively small evolutionary enhancements.
✓ In 2019,Substantial changes were introduced as AIAG & VDA “harmonized” their
difference for conducting FMEA’s
Ford Auto
US Military NASA
Industry
AIAG AIAG&VDA
Why FMEA?
Complete DFMEA
Complete DFMEA
Start FMEA planning Start DFMEA when analysis prior to
actions prior to
DFMEA in concept phase the design concept release of design
start of production
before product is well understood specifications for
tooling
development begins quotation
Information flow
Start again with
from DFMEA to
DFMEA and PFMEA
PFMEA
planning if there are
The DFMEA and
changes to an
PFMEA should be
existing design or
executed during the
process
same time period to Start PFMEA when
Complete PFMEA Complete PFMEA
allow optimization of the production
PFMEA both the product and concept is well
analysis prior to final actions prior to
process decisions PPAP
process designs understood
7.Result 4.Failure
6.Optimization 5.Risk Analysis
Documentation Analysis
✓ inTent: What is and isn't included in the scope of this project and why is the FMEA being
undertaken?
✓ Timing: When will the FMEA be done? (includes when in the product/process
development cycle to conduct the study with deadlines for completing the FMEA).
✓ Team: Who will be on the core team and extended team and what are the members'
✓ Tools: What tools will the team use or will the team need to complete the project.
The concept of a “Failure Chain” helps to visualize failures as part of three links of a chain comprised of
the Failure Effect (FE), Failure Mode (FM) and Failure Cause (FC). In turn, this clarity will help assign
2.Focus Element
Design-FMEAs and Process-FMEAs use the (familiar) S-O-D approach to evaluate risk.
✓ Severity (S) is an estimate of how serious the impact of the failure effect would be assuming that a
specific failure mode occurred. To determine the Severity, consider the impact the effect would
have on a customer, a customer's operation, your operation, your customer’s operation, and end-
✓ Occurrence (O) reflects the prediction of each Failure Cause Occurring based on the type of control
(behavioral, technical or best practice methodology). For Prevention Controls with multiple
Occurrence Ratings, use the rating that best reflects the robustness of the control.
✓ Detection (D) is used to depict the relative effectiveness of the system to either prevent a potential
failure mode or failure cause or to detect a failure mode or cause has occurred
Safe Dangerous
Potential cause of
Occurrence (O) Failure Rating Value (FC)
Detection or process
Detection (D) control method Rating
(FC or FM)
Defect can be detected and not pass No detection
AP High (H)
Action to improve prevention and/or
detection controls (or justification on why
current controls are adequate) MUST be
taken.
AP Medium (M)
Action to improve prevention and/or
detection controls (or justification on why
current controls are adequate) SHOULD
be taken.
AP Low (L)
Action to improve prevention and/or
detection controls COULD be taken.
✓ FMEAs and Cost of Quality go hand-in-hand, While the immediate benefit of the
Quality (COQ).
✓ FMEA comes under the Prevention & Appraisal Cost categories, An efficient
FMEA will see Failure costs will go down substantially more than the
Like it