International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396
Performance Analysis of Samabusa Port at Nabire
Bastian Semy irianto1,Sumarni Hamid Aly2,Syafruddin Rauf2
1
Master Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Hasanuddin
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty Engineering, Universitas Hasanuddin
Abstract - This study aims to analyze the condition of the
volume of passenger, cargo and
ship flow at the Samabusa Nabire Port in Papua. In addition,
this study also seeks to model the phenomena of the
development of passenger, cargo and ship visit phenomena at
the Samabusa Nabire Port, as well as to model port
performance performance based on the perception of
Samabusa Nabire Port users. Collecting data in this study
through secondary survey data related to the volume of
passenger, cargo and ship flow data at the port. Besides that, a
primary survey was also conducted to collect data on port
users' perceptions of the service performance of the Samabusa
Nabire Port. Data analysis and modeling methods use a linear
regression approach to modeling the volume of demand flow at
the port, and a logistic regression model approach to modeling
port user perceptions. The results of the analysis and modeling
of the volume of passenger, goods and ship currents show that
there is a tendency to increase demand from year to year,
which requires increasing service facilities. The perception of
port service performance shows that dominant port users state
that access road facilities are needed to improve the
performance of the Samabusa Port in Nabire. The results of
the study can be utilized for stakeholders in the Samabusa
Nabire Port in the context of increasing port service capacity.
Keywords: service performance, passengers, Samabusa Port,
Nabire
I. INTRODUCTION
Indonesia as the largest archipelago in the world is
very important to develop the role of shipping, especially
to improve the economy, social life, governance, defense
and security. The activities on the voyage are very broad
which include among others passenger and goods
transportation, coast guard, hydrographic, and others. One
of the infrastructures to support the shipping activities is
the port.
The port is a stop (terminal) for ships after making a
voyage. Various activities carried out at the port include
the ups and downs of passengers, loading and unloading
of goods, refueling and fresh water, making repairs,
carrying out supplies, and so on. To be able to carry out
these various activities, the port must be equipped with
facilities such as breakwater, jetty, mooring equipment,
loading and unloading equipment, warehouses, goods
storage area, offices both for port managers and shipping
airlines, waiting rooms for passengers, filling equipment
fuel and water supply, etc. (Triatmodjo, 2015).
Common problems that occur in port infrastructure and
facilities in Indonesia are related to the increase in
shipping volumes that are not followed by additional dock
capacity, inadequate port technology such as lack of a
crane, and an administrative system that slows the flow of
p-ISSN: 2356-5314
e-ISSN: 2460-075X
goods distribution that occurs when dwelling time process.
This condition will directly or indirectly affect port
performance.
The Samabusa Port is geographically located at 03 ° 13 '51
"South Latitude and 135 ° 35' 1" East BT is the main port in
Nabire Regency which is a container loading and unloading
port (container). The port of Samabusa plays an important role
because it is an economic node and as a way of entry and exit
of goods across Papua.
Today the container transportation system is a prima donna
in the sea and land transportation systems in general. This is
because container transportation has several advantages,
including the security of goods and the speed of the loading
and unloading process. Ports with container terminals play a
strategic role in ensuring the smooth flow of containers in and
out of a region. Therefore it is necessary to assess indicators to
assess the operational performance of container ports. By
knowing its performance, it is expected that in the future the
container terminal in Eastern Indonesia can provide maximum
service to customers so that it will have an impact on
improving performance in the future. In the end, this increase
will have an impact on economic growth that will reduce the
gap in the price of goods between Eastern Indonesia and
Western Indonesia.
In connection with this, research is needed concerning the
performance of the port which concerns the performance of
ship currents, loading and unloading currents, and utilization of
facilities at the Samabusa Nabire Port. It is hoped that from
this study port performance can be produced which can
become the basis for related parties in making policies in the
future. Based on this the author considers the need to do a
study with the title:
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Port
According to Government Regulation No.69 of 2001
Article 1 paragraph 1, concerning Port, port is a place consisting
of land and waters around it with certain boundaries as a place of
government activities and economic activities that are used as a
place for ships to berth, berths, passengers' ups and downs and /
or loading and unloading of goods equipped with shipping safety
facilities and supporting port activities and as a place of intra and
intermodal transportation.
B. Port Performance
According to the Indonesian Port (2000), performance
port is the achievement of the output or level of success of
services, use of facilities and port equipment in a certain time
396
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

period, which is determined in terms of time units, weight

units, ratio ratio (percentage). Port performance which is D. Flowchart of Research
commonly used today in port operation, basically can be
The flowchart of this study can be seen in the following
grouped into 3 (three), namely: 1) Performance of loading
figure below.
and unloading services of goods; 2) Performance of ship
services; 3) Port facility utility performance

C. Previous Study of
Port Facility Operational Performance Evaluation in
Tanjung Intan, Cilacap. This study aims to evaluate the
performance of existing port facilities (1996-2005),
evaluate the current port master plan, and formulate the
direction of port facility development policies, both for the
short term (5 years), the medium term (10 years) and the
long term long (20 years), especially for service
improvement. The results of the port performance research
are still quite good.

III. RESEARCH METHOD

A. Location and Time of Research The
study was conducted at the Port of Samabusa Nabire
in Nabire District, Papua. This port is important because it
is one of the main ports. The flow of goods through the
Port of Samabusa Nabire has a major influence on the
logistics chain of several districts in the mountainous
regions namely, Dogiyai Regency, Deiyai Regency, and
Paniai Regency.
When the study was conducted for 1 (one) month, namely
in the period of June 2019.

B. Data Collection Method Data Figure 1. Flowchart of research

collection used in this study is in the form of a
literature study of secondary data from sources related to
this research, especially those sourced from the Office of
the Class II Port Operating Unit Nabire and other library
sources. The primary data obtained by interview with staff
management and Engineering Office Unitt Operator Port
Class II Nabire
C. Analysis Methods Data
1. Presentation and Analysis Data
analysis method used in this research is using
comparative analysis of qualitative based on results of
quantitative calculations on secondary data and primer
obtained.
2. Linear Regression Statistical Analysis
In this study used linear regression statistical analysis
to predict the flow of goods loading and unloading and
number of ships entering and leaving the port
3. Modeling Mode Selection
The conditional logit (MCL) model approach is used
at this stage to model the selection of inter-city
transportation modes by public transport passengers,
private transport passengers and aircraft users.
The variables used as independent variables in the
model are variables from the characteristic data and
preferences from the questionnaire, then the independent
variables are formed by the utility function of each mode
choice.
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results and discussion of this study are:
A. Profile of Samabusa Nabire
Port Hierarchy of Samabusa Port according to the Decree
of the Minister of Transportation Number KP 432 of 2017
concerning the National Port Master Plan is the Collecting Port
with the role as the location of the seaport used for sea
transportation with 4 locations as a port plan, namely Kuatisore,
Napan, P. Mambor, and P. Moor.
The location of the Samabusa Port is located on the side
of the national road, which connects Nabire Regency and
Waropen Regency to the east, and Teluk Wondama Regency and
Kaimana Regency to the West in West Papua Province, and in
Samabusa Village, Kimi Bay District, Nabire Regency, Papua
Province, with an astronomical location of 03 ° 13 '50.8 "latitude
and 135 ° 34' 59.1" east longitude.
B. Existing Condition of Samabusa Nabire Port
1. Coll Coll Visit Ship
397
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

80 14,000
Number of Coll Ship Visits

Passenger Drops (People)

70 12,000
60
10,000
50
2018 8,000
40 2018
2017 6,000
30 2017
2016 4,000
20
2016
10 2015 2,000
2015
- -

Month Month

Figure 1. Distribution Chart Coll Coll Figure 5 Distribution Diagram Passenger

2. Visit Ship GT Visit 6. Rides Passenger Ride

500,000
16,000
Number of GT Visits

Passenger Rides (People)

450,000
14,000
400,000
350,000 12,000
2018 2018
300,000 10,000
250,000 2017 8,000 2017
200,000 2016 6,000 2016
150,000
2015 4,000
100,000 2015
50,000 2,000
- -

Month
Month

Chart 2 Distribution Chart Visit GT Ship Figure 6 Distribution Diagram of Passenger Ride on

3. Unloading 7. Unloading Container

80,000 3,500
Number of Unloading Containers
Unloading Transport (Ton / M3)

70,000 3,000
60,000 2,500
50,000 2018 2018
2,000
40,000 2017 2017
1,500
30,000 2016 2016
20,000 1,000
2015 2015
10,000 500
- -

Month Month

Figure 3 Distribution Diagram of Loading and Unloading Figure 7 Distribution Chart of Unloading

4. Transport of Loading 8. Container Load Container

60,000 3,500
Number of Containers Loaded
Load Transport (Ton / M3)

3,000
50,000
2,500
40,000 2018
2,000
30,000 2018 2017
1,500
20,000 2017 2016
1,000
2016 2015
10,000 500
2015
- -

Month Month

Figure 4 Distribution Chart of Load Transport Figure 8 Distribution Diagram of Unloading Containers

5. Passenger Dismounting C. Characteristics of Samabusa Nabire Port Passengers /

Users
In the study the characteristics reviewed were divided into three
parts namely, age, last education, occupation
1. respondents age

398
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

Other's 0 2 1 0

11% 7% Citizens 0 8 4 1
Kemenhub's Civil Servant 0 12 2

Job's
23%
< 20 Years Private Employee 0 7 5 12 0
21-30 Years Pelindo's Servant 0 2 1 14 1
31-40 Years Worker 0 1 4 7 0
37%
41-50 Years Crew 0 1 7 0
> 50 Years 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

33% Crane Condition Perception

Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

towards work Figure 12 Graph distribution of perceptions of the

condition of cranes to the occupation of passengers / users of
Diagram Figure 9.distribution of respondents to the age Samabusa Nabire Port

2. Respondent’s Last Education 2. Perception Relationship of Amount of Container

Doesn't pass Trucks Enough to Occupation
8% 6%
Elementary School Other's 0 1 2 0
Elemantry Schrool
Citizens 0 1 5 6 1

34% Junior High School Kemenhub's Civil Servant 0 2 0 9 3

46%
Job's
Private Employee 1 8 4 10 1

Senior High School Pelindo's Servant 0 6 0 11 1

46% Worker 0 2 10 0
30% Diploma Crew 0 2 0 5 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Bachelor Number of Container Trucks Perception
14%
Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Diagram Figure 10. distribution of respondents to the latest Figure 13 . Samabusa Nabire Port users
Education
3. Perception Relationship of Number of Forklifts
3. jobs respondents Enough to Work
Other's 0 1 0 2 0
5% 13% Citizens 0 8 2 3 0
21% Crew
Kemenhub's…0 12 0 2 0
19% Worker
Job's

Private… 1 16 4 3 0
Pelindo's Servant
Pelindo's…0 13 2 1 2
23% Private Employee
Worker 0 5 2 4 1
Kemenhub's Civil Servant
29%
Citizens Crew 0 6 2 0

Other's 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

39% Perceptions of Adequacy of Forklifts
Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Figure 14 Graph of distribution of perceptions relationship

Figure 11. Diagram of distribution of respondents to thejob between number of forklifts to passenger work / users of
Samabusa Nabire Port
D. performance Relationship ModelPela buhan
Based on User Perception 4. Perception Relationship of Waiting Time Fasting Ship
1. Relationship Perception Condition of Existing Fast to Work
Cranes functioning well

399
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

Other's 0 1 1 Other's 1 1 0 1 0

Citizens 0 9 2 2 0 Citizens 1 7 3 2 0

Kemenhub's…0 4 3 6 1 Kemenhub's Civil Servant 0 4 3 6 1

Job's
Job's

Private…0 7 4 11 2 Private Employee 2 7 12 3 0

Pelindo's…0 4 3 11 0 Pelindo's Servant 0 8 2 6 2

Worker 0 4 2 5 1 Worker 2 2 4 4 0

Crew 0 3 3 2 0 Crew 1 3 3 1 0

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Boat Speeding Perception Warehouse Capacity Adequacy Perception

Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Figure 15 Graph of distribution of waiting time relationships Figure 18 Graph distribution relationship feasibility capacity
anchoring fast boat to passenger work / Samabusa Nabire storage to employment passengers / users Piers Samabusa Nabire
Port users
8. Relations Perception Capacity of Port Access Roads to
5. Perception of Dock Service Perception to Work Work
Other's 0 2 1 0 Other's 1 0 2 0
Citizens 0 7 3 3 0 Citizens 1 1 2 9 0
Kemenhub's Civil…0 4 5 5 0 Kemenhub's…0 4 6 4
Job's

Job's
Private Employee 2 6 3 11 2 Private… 6 8 7 3 0
Pelindo's Servant 0 4 2 10 2 Pelindo's…0 2 6 10 0
Worker 0 4 3 4 1 Worker 2 1 4 5 0
Crew 0 3 2 3 0 Crew 0 2 1 5 0

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Perception of Pier Services Perception of Capacity of Access Road to the Port
Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Figure 16 Graphic distribution of fast dock service Figure 19 Graphic distribution relationship of port access road
relationships to the occupants / users of Samabu Port sa capacity to occupation of passengers / users of the Samabusa
Nabire Nabire Port
6. Relations Perception of Feasibility Field Stacking 9. Perception Relationship of Container Administration
Against Occupation Ease to Work
Other's 0 3 0 Other's 0 1 2 0
Citizens 0 2 11 0 Citizens 0 2 0 11 0
Kemenhub's Civil…0 4 9 1 Kemenhub's Civil Servant 1 1 2 6 4
Job's

Job's

Private Employee 1 4 7 10 2 Private Employee 2 1 9 8 4

Pelindo's Servant 10 3 12 2 Pelindo's Servant 2 1 1 8 6
Worker 0 2 3 7 0 Worker 2 1 3 4 2
Crew 0 2 1 5 0 Crew 2 1 0 4 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Stacking Field Eligibility Perception Perception of Ease of Container Administration
Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Figure 17 Graph distribution relationship feasibility Figure 20 Distribution graphs of the relationship between
warehouse capacity to work passengers / users Piers container administration ease to work of Samabusa Nabire Port
Samabusa Nabire passengers / users
7. Relations Perception of Feasibility Capacity 10. of Perception Relationship Low Cost Expenditures of
Warehouse Against Occupation Goods Against Work

400
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

Other's 0 1 2 0

Citizens 0 1 2 10 0
Pekerjaan

Kemenhub's Civil…0 1 3 10 0

Private Employee 1 8 3 11 1

Pelindo's Servant 0 2 3 12 1

Worker 0 3 1 6 2

Crew 0 1 2 4 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Low Cost of Goods Expenditures perception
Very disagree Disagree Netral Agree Very Agree

Figure 21 Graphic distribution of the relationship of the low

cost of goods released to the work of passengers / users of
Pelab uhan Samabusa NabireFacility and

11. STATA Relationship between Waiting

RoomPassenger Characteristics at Sentani Figure 22 Results of Statistical Analysis of STATA
Airport - Jayapura
Based on Figure 41 it is known that the results of the
STATA analysis show the results of the value on P (Value),
Most of the values generated are more than 0 , 05 where if a P
value (Value) exceeds 0.05 then it is assumed that the variable
has no significant effect on the other variables reviewed,
conversely if a P (Value) value is less than 0.05 then that
variable is considered to have a significant effect on the variable
others reviewed.
From these results it can be concluded that some of the
perceptual relationships did not significantly influence the work
of passengers / users of the Samabusa Nabire Port.
The estimation results presented in Table 2 show that
the level of significance with MNL for the four modal categories
through a likelihood ratio indicator of 75.76 with a Prob> Chi2
of 0.000 identifies that the independent variable influences the
dependent variable, with avalue pseudo 𝑅 2 = 0.3559 which
means that the independent variable is only able to explain the
dependent variable by 35%. As per the significance of the results
it can be seen that the mini bus is the most popular mode for
foreign tourists because this mode makes it easy for foreign
tourists to visit tourist sites, especially for tourists who are
visiting Toraja for the first time.

V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

A. CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the above research it was
concluded that the operational performance of the Samabusa
Port in Nabire Regency;
1. Intensity of Coll Ship Visits The highest in December
2017 as many as 69
2. Intensity of Visits of GT Ship The highest was in August
in 2018 as many as 440,045 ships
3. The most number of unloading transport was in
September in 2018 with 70,968 Tons / M3
4. The highest number of Loaded Transportation was at in
September in 2018 as many as 54,198 Tons / M3 The
5. number of passengers dropped the most was in January in
2015 as many as 11,649highest
6. Thenumber of Passengers rose was in July in 2015 as
many as 13,993highest

401
International Journal on Smart Material and Mechatronics p-ISSN: 2356-5314
IJSMM Vol. 7 No. 1 2020 DOI. 10.20342/IJSMM.7.1.396 e-ISSN: 2460-075X

7. Thenumber of unloading containers was in

September 2018 as many as 2,903 The
8. number of containers loaded the most are in
September 2018 as many as 2,961
From the STATA analysis shows the results of the
value on P (Value), Most of the values generated are more
than 0.05 where if a P value (Value) exceeds the value of
0.05 then it is assumed that the variable is not Significant
effect on other variables determined also, on the contrary if
the P value (Value) is less than 0.05 then the variable is
considered to have a significant effect on the other variables
reviewed.
From these results it can be concluded that some
perceptual relationships do not significantly influence the
occupation of passengers / users of the Samabusa Nabire
Port;

B. SUGGESTIONS
It is necessary to conduct further research on the
analysis of the performance of the Samabusa Nabire Port in
order to get other perceptions that can improve the
performance of the Samabusa Nabire Port in the future.

REFERENCES

[1] Department of Transportation, (2001), Government

Regulation Number 69 of 2001 concerning Ports,
Jakarta.
[2] Ministry of Transportation, (2002), Decree of the
Minister of Transportation Number KM.53 of 2002
concerning the National Port Order, Jakarta.
[3] Gultom, E., (2007), Refunctionalization of Port
Arrangements to Improve the National Economy,
Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
[4] Kramadibrata, Soedjono., (2002), Port Planning, ITB
Publishers, Bandung.
[5] Machbar, Djawani., (202), Performance Evaluation and
Development of Pontianak Port Container Terminal,
UGM, Yogyakarta.
[6] Pelabuhan Indonesia, (2000), Port References, Jakarta.
[7] Suranto, SE, (2004), Sea Transportation and Port
Management Operational Management and Goods
Import Procedure, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
[8] Suyono, RP, (2005), Shipping, Intermodal
Transportation of Import and Export by Sea, PPM
Publisher, Jakarta.
[9] Triadmodjo, Bambang., (2003), Harbor, Beta Offset,
Yogyakarta.
[10] Yuwono, Nur., (2007), Water Transportation Lecture
Module, UGM, Yogyakarta.
[11] Zar'annuddin, M., (1997), Analysis of the supply of
Tanjung Wangi port in Banyuwangi in Meeting the
Needs, ITB Publisher, Bandung.

402