Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Physician-Assisted Suicide Research Project 2
Physician-Assisted Suicide Research Project 2
Esmeralda Ayala
administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician (Marks,
2021). Physician-assisted suicide is also known as PAS or Aid-In Dying known as AID. In the
1800’s a man by the name Samuel Williams proposed a dose of morphine to end a patient’s life
(Herath et al., 2021). During the 1980’s Jacob Kevorkian from Detroit, MI started spreading the
word through newspapers to let the public know of lethal medications to end one's life, as he was
considered to be a death counselor (Dugdale et al., 2019). In 1990, Kevorkian had his first patient
take her life with his assistance (Dugdale et al., 2019). In some cases doctors were even
considered to be murderers and were incarcerated due to the action (Dugdale et al., 2019). Even
though doctors around the world were administering this service, it didn't mean it was legal. To
this day, physician-assited suicide was and still is prohibited in other countries or states. People
with Terminally ill diseases should have the right to take their own life; Therefore,
Oregon became one of the first states in the United States to pass its death with dignity
Law in 1997 (Dugdale et al., 2019). Along came Washington legalizing PAS in 2008 and
Vermont in 2013 (Dugdale et al., 2019). It wasn’t until after Brittany Maynard who was
diagnosed with a terminally ill disease, who decided to move from California to Oregon to go
through the process of the physician-assisted suicide in 2014 (Dugdale et al., 2019). After
Maynard became an advocate for PAS, and after her passing, the state of California then
legalized PAS in 2015. Since then Colorado, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, New Jersey and
Maine have also legalized physician-assisted suicide (Dugdale et al., 2019). Some of the
countries who also legalized physician-assisted suicide were Switzerland, the Netherlands,
Belgium, Luxembourg, Austria, Spain, Columbia and Canada (Montagna et al., 2023). Although
3
many of these states and countries were in favor of physician-assited suicide, others have
Patients deserve to be respected and even so more when it comes to their own medical
decisions. Having patient autonomy ensures the patient that their medical decisions will be
respected regardless of what their physicians recommend. Studies have been conducted within
legalized. From 2015 to 2016, a study was evaluated to test the point of views and needs of
physicians and health care workers in a Canadian hospital (Frolic et al.,2022). The goal for this
study was to help health care professionals understand the patient's last will and to help aid in a
PAS situation. Based on the findings of this study, it was found that nearly more than 90% of the
participants supported the idea of PAS (Frolic et al., 2022). Many of the participants found
themselves in disbelief as they knew this was breaking their Hippocratic Oath. Hippocratic Oaths
were created over 2,400 years ago (Kopel, 2022). This ceremonial oath is taken by physicians to
vow that they will help the sick and do no harm to them (Kopel, 2022). One participant even
stated, “It is against everything we learned as nurses” (Frolic et al., 2022). Although some
physicians feel they are breaking their oath and this goes against everything they believe in,
others argue,”the relief of suffering through lethal ingestion is humane and compassionate if the
patient is dying and suffering is refractory” (Dugdale el al., 2019). Nonetheless, physicians
understand and respect the patient’s autonomy when it comes to physician-assisted suicide.
When dealing with a terminally ill patient, most of the time the doctors and families do
not know what the person’s last wishes are before they leave this earth. Of course, not unless a
written will is left behind. However, beneficence requires doctors to do what is best for others
when it comes to their well being. In the case of PAS, the doctor must administer and care for the
4
ill patient (Akdeniz et al., 2021). Even if that means taking their own life when they are ready to
do so, alongside with their family. If a terminally ill patient decides to follow the route of PAS,
they are under the care of the doctor. The doctor explains all of the knowledgeable information
that the patient and their family need to know during the process of PAS. Many of the patients
who decide to do physican-assited suicide, they do it to end their pain and suffering. They would
rather do this before the disease takes over their body and mind while they are still coherent.
One other thing about PAS is that it is also less expensive to administer it than to do an
end-of-life care. With that being said, it definitely takes away the financial burden off of the
family while administering the PAS process. PAS can decrease the amount of suffering between
the family and the patient as everything is planned out accordingly with time by the patient
(Frolic et al., 2022). It has been stated by (Dugdale et al., 2019), that up to half of the patients
with cancer suffer from symptoms of depression. Within the processes of PAS, it is important for
the patient and family to receive the support they need from their physician and friends.
psychological means (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). This therapy is for patients that may be mentally
ill or have emotional difficulties. Cancer patients can be emotionally distressed and
psychologically distressed. Psychotherapy helps cancer patients cope with the challenges of the
terminal illness (Saracino et al., 2019). According to (Saracino et al., 2019), the three goals to
psychotherapy are to one, help promote a supportive environment and have patients inspect their
personal issues and feelings that surround them. Two, to give a better understanding of the
possible resources available before and after diagnosis. Three, help patients to discover the sense
of meaning in life even when their illness progresses. When it comes to a patient and physician
relationship, through out the process of physician-assisted suicide it shows that physicians are
5
there to do good acts of kindness. This shows that beneficence is a good ethic benefit for both the
As physicians hold under oath to not harm others, nonmaleficence is the principle of
withholding from causing any unnecessary harm (Akdeniz et al., 2021). Even though it may
seem wrong for the physician to support and be part of PAS, people may feel that physician’s are
inflicting pain towards the patient but in reality they are not. The physician’s obligation here is to
adhere to his oath which does not inflict harm to others. In this case, the physician is relieving the
patient from all their pain and suffering. In no way are they hurting the patient other than
Everyone deserves to be treated fairly, no matter where they’re from, what their ethnicity
is, gender, sexuality, and wealth. In medical ethics, justice plays an important role when it comes
to a patient who is terminally ill. With justice, the patient feels secure that they will be treated
fairly during the process of PAS and that their confidentiality will be respected. Medical
resources are often limited and should be administered fairly and equally (Akdeniz et al., 2021).
It is the responsibility of the physician to provide equal medical care by providing the terminally
ill patient with the resources they need and educating them by providing them with the
information they need to know about the PAS process (Akdeniz et al., 2021). By educating the
patient with the information they need to know about their disease and about PAS, it shows a
good communication skill set between physician and patient. This builds a strong relationship
between both physician and patient. It also makes the patient feel comfortable knowing that
everything will be taken care of once they decide to leave this world. Even though patients have
the right to make their own choice, physicians should provide the patient with every medical
option they can get their hands on and what the outcomes are for each possible option (Akdeniz
6
et al., 2021). Justice helps people maintain good health. If we didn’t have justice in a medical
setting, patients would not trust the physician, the medicine or the treatment.
countries to help terminally ill patients alleviate their pain and suffering. Since Physician-Assited
Suicide was implemented we have seen a rise in this program in a span of a 5 year period
(Montagna et al., 2023). With the rise of PAS, many may see this as a positive thing, an
achievement for something great. Something good that a terminally ill patient can take advantage
of. While others may see the increasement of cases as something negative, something to be
worried about. With autonomy, only the patient has the right to make their own medical choices
and their choices are well respected. Family members are there to only provide their love and
support for the patient. Beneficence is an act of kindness, physicians are there to help patients
with their wellbeing and the patient benefits from this act of kindness. When it comes to
non-maleficence, the physician is under oath and his duty is to protect the patient and do no harm
to the patient. Lastly, justice, with justice, patients get treated fairly. Resources and medical
attention are equally provided to the patient as well. Making physician-assisted suicide a well
To conclude, I think it is important to keep the patient well educated on the aspects of
their disease and the options of treatment they can select from. During the process of
Physician-Assisten Suicide both parties, the patient and the families will endure mental and
emotional distress. Psychiatrists can provide the psychological help they will need. Despite of
everyones beliefs and traditions, physician-assited suicide has helped terminally ill patients and
their families find the peace they were looking for. The decision- making is up to the patient and
7
with the good communication of the physicians, patients can now rest in peace as they leave this
References
Akdeniz, M., Yardımcı, B., & Kavukcu, E. (2021). Ethical considerations at the end-of-life care.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000918
Dugdale, L. S., Lerner, B. H., & Callahan, D. (2019). Pros and Cons of Physician Aid in Dying.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913818/
Frolic, A., Murray, L., Swinton, M., & Miller, P. (2022). Getting Beyond Pros and Cons: Results
HEC forum : An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues, 34(4),
391–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09492-w
Hetzler, P. T., 3rd, Nie, J., Zhou, A., & Dugdale, L. S. (2019). A Report of Physicians' Beliefs
about Physician-Assisted Suicide: A National Study. The Yale Journal of Biology and
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913834/
Kopel J. (2021). The Hippocratic Oath across the interfaith spectrum. Proceedings (Baylor
https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2021.1993113
2023
9
Montagna, G., Junker, C., Elfgen, C., Schneeberger, A. R., & Güth, U. (2023). Long-term
https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2023.40010
Saracino, R. M., Rosenfeld, B., Breitbart, W., & Chochinov, H. M. (2019). Psychotherapy at the
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1674552