Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics

N Range Minimu Maximu Mean Std. Variance Skewness

m m Deviation

Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Statistic Statistic Statistic Std.
Error Error

435 29764 20183 49947 35279.0 414.148 8637.734 74610441.8 -.026 .117
ids
2 29
Valid N 435
(listwise)

Normality test

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

ids 435 100.0% 0 0.0% 435 100.0%

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

Mean 35279.02 414.148

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 34465.04

Mean Upper Bound 36093.01

5% Trimmed Mean 35300.04

Median 35350.00

Variance 74610441.829

ids Std. Deviation 8637.734

Minimum 20183

Maximum 49947

Range 29764

Interquartile Range 14723

Skewness -.026 .117

Kurtosis -1.152 .234

 Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

ids .057 435 .002 .958 435 .000

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

2. One Sample T test:
Description:
Apply one sample T test to check the hypothesis that the average time travel of
genders like male and female in university is 50mint from stop. A sample of 5
genders has travel the following time as:
35, 15, 42,65, 27
Formulating Hypothesis:

H0: µ=50

H1: µ≠50
Significance level:

the significance level is (α=0.05).

Critical Region:

the value of t is 2.262.

Results:

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

time it takes into unit(min) 5 15 65 36.80 18.687

Valid N (listwise) 5

One-Sample Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

time it takes into unit(min) 5 36.80 18.687 8.357

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 0

t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Lower Upper

time it takes into unit(min) 4.403 4 .012 36.800 13.60 60.00

Interpretation:

3. Two Sample T test:

Description:

Test two sample T test. It contain 5 samples in each group of gender and travel time.
Gender: 0, 0, 1, 0, 1

Travel time: 35,15,42, 65,27

we have to determine the means of two groups having a significance of level 0.05.

Formulating Hypothesis:

Ho: µ1=µ2

H1: µ1≠µ2

Significance level:

Level of significance is 0.05.

Critical Region:

value of t is 2.262.

Results:

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Gender .40 5 .548 .245

Pair 1
time it takes into unit(min) 36.80 5 18.687 8.357

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Gender & time it takes into 5 -.112 .857

Pair 1
unit(min)

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-

Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval tailed)

Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper
Pair Gender - time it - 18.756 8.388 -59.689 -13.111 -4.339 4 .012

1 takes into unit(min) 36.400

Interpretation:
The mean values for gender and the time travel are 0.40 and 36.80 respectively.
Their standard deviations are 0.548 and 18.687. And standard error for gender is
0.245 while for time travel its value is 8.357.
Calculated P value is 0.012. considering the sig. value from first row of T-Test for
equality of means is 0.40 which is greater than α= 0.025. So it is concluded that
there is no statistically significant difference among the means of gender and
travel time. So the null hypothesis is accepted

4. Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test:

Description:
Following is the Description of data and both populations are different:
ID Gender Travel Time
1 0 35
2 0 15
3 1 42
4 0 65
5 1 25

Formulation of Hypothesis:
H0= P1= P2
H1= P1≠ P2
Significance level:
The level of significance is 0.05.
Results:
 Descriptive Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

Gender 5 .40 .548 0 1

time it takes into unit(min) 5 36.80 18.687 15 65

Ranks

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Negative Ranks 0a .00 .00

time it takes into unit(min) - Positive Ranks 5b 3.00 15.00

Gender Ties 0c

Total 5

a. time it takes into unit(min) < Gender

b. time it takes into unit(min) > Gender
c. time it takes into unit(min) = Gender

Test Statisticsa

time it takes into

unit(min) -
Gender

Z -2.023b
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .043

a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

b. Based on negative ranks.

Interpretation:
Mann Whitney U- test is used to test whether two samples likely to derive from
the same population

5. Chi-Square Test
Description:
The data file contains the time travel by gender like male or female. We have to
check that time travel by gender is dependent or independent.
Formulation of hypothesis:
H0: Gender and time travel are independent
H1: Gender and Time Travel are not independent
Level of significance:
Level of significance is α=0.05.
Results:

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

time it takes into unit(min) * 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%

Gender

time it takes into unit(min) * Gender Crosstabulation

Gender Total

male female

Count 1 0 1
15
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

Count 0 1 1
27
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

Count 1 0 1
time it takes into unit(min) 35
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

Count 0 1 1
42
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0

Count 1 0 1
65
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0
Count 3 2 5
Total
Expected Count 3.0 2.0 5.0

Chi-Square Tests
 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.000

a
4 .287
Likelihood Ratio 6.730 4 .151
Linear-by-Linear Association .050 1 .822
N of Valid Cases 5

a. 10 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .40.

Interpretation:
Mann Whitney U Test:
Description:
File contain sales during the different weeks.
We want to know sales of different weeks. is there is sum of significant difference
between them?
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spss-statistics/26.0.0?topic=tutorial-sample-file

Hypothesis:
H0: Sale is same across the weeks
H1: Sale is not same across the weeks
Level of Significance:
α =0.05
Results:

Ranks

week N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

8.00 1 1.00 1.00

sales 9.00 1 2.00 2.00

Total 2

Test Statisticsa

Sales
Mann-Whitney U .000
Wilcoxon W 1.000
Z -1.000
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .317
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] 1.000b

a. Grouping Variable: week

b. Not corrected for ties.

Interpretation:

Mann Whitney U- test is used to test whether two samples likely to derive from
the same population.
As shown by the descriptive statistics that the sales were higher in first week
than the second week. Mean ra

7. Sign Test
Description:
Is there is a significant reduction in the number of sick days taken after
completing the wellness program using 0.05 level of significance. Meadian is 30.
Data: number of sick days before and after wellness program

Hypothesis:
H0= 30
H1 ≠30
Level of Significance:
α = 0.05
Results:

Descriptive Statistics
 N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

sick_Days_Before 8 7.00 3.207 2 12

Sick_Days_After 8 5.50 3.024 1 11

Frequencies

Negative Differencesa 6

Sick_Days_After - Positive Differencesb 1

sick_Days_Before Tiesc 1

Total 8

a. Sick_Days_After < sick_Days_Before

b. Sick_Days_After > sick_Days_Before
c. Sick_Days_After = sick_Days_Before

Test Statisticsa

Sick_Days_After
-
sick_Days_Befo
re

Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .125b

a. Sign Test
b. Binomial distribution used.