Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discussion
Discussion
B. Discussion
This section discusses the results of the research. It starts by exploring the
needs analysis results and explaining the results of the implementation. Both of them
are analyzed based on the six components of a task that is proposed by Nunan (1989:
48) namely goal, input, activities, setting, learner role, and teacher role.
From the needs analysis, the goals that the students want to reach are capable
to do the English communication both in oral or written forms well and all at once
comprehend the meaning and the using of every single word, sentence, and
expression in English. Meanwhile, the preferable inputs are pictures which are
completed with explanation, short texts with pictures, and vocabulary lists. For the
activities, the students like to listen to a dialogue. In speaking, they prefer to practice
a short dialogue which will be presented in front of the class. Then, in relation to the
reading activities, the students want to translate the words of the texts and then check
whether the meaning of the words are suitable or not with the text and they also want
to discuss the difficult words in the reading text. Moreover, the activity in writing that
they like the most is discussing the English grammar. Concerning the teacher and
learner role, based on the students’ perspectives, it will be effective if the teacher
gives explanation before the students doing the tasks while they want to be
communicative participant in the classroom who could interact actively with the
teacher and their friends. Related to the setting, in order to be effective, they like
The results of the needs analysis, then, were used to write the course grid
SMP. Afterward, the course grid was developed into English materials for the first
grade students of SMPN 2 Wonosari. The developed material consists of three units.
Moreover, each unit consists of 17 to 25 tasks which are divided in two cycles, namely the
spoken cycle (listening and speaking) and written cycle (reading and writing). In the process
(2004) were used to organize each task in every unit. As mentioned earlier, a unit is
divided into two cycles, i.e. spoken and written cycle. The tasks in every cycle were
graded and sequenced by considering the complexity of the input, which were
arranged from the simple (easiest) input to the difficult (complex) one, students’
linguistic and background knowledge, and the procedures that learners are required to
perform on input data. Meanwhile, an effective task also has to integrate the
components of the task which are also mentioned before. It will be effective if those
The next discussion is the results of the materials evaluation. Regarding task
goal, it adopted the communicative goal type proposed by Clark (1987 in Nunan,
2004), who states that language is used for “...exchange information, ideas, opinions,
attitudes and feelings...”. Therefore, the goals of the tasks in the developed material
3
are to improve the students’ listening skill by listening to a dialogue which provide
practice speaking based on the language function being discussed, to obtain certain
and a shopping list. As the result, the task goals which based on the Clark’s theory are
effective and can be applied to the first students of SMPN 2 Wonosari. It is because
they are achievable. The statement is supported by the quantitative and qualitative
Concerning task inputs, those adopted the theory of Harmer who says that it is
one of prominent teaching aid that is used in this developed material. It can be used in
a multiplicity of ways, for instance, it is useful for ‘drilling’ grammar items and
meaning and it is important for engaging the students to follow the task and also for
predicting the next task (Harmer, 2001: 134-136). In addition, the inputs were also
designed by considering the Hutchinson and Waters’s theory (1987: 108-109) who
state that the input should provide the stimulus material for activities, new language
items, the correct models of language use, a topic for communication, the
opportunities for learners to use their information processing skills as well as their
opportunities to use their existing knowledge both of the language and the subject
matter. Therefore, the inputs used in the unit design are pictures followed by short
4
explanation, vocabulary related to the topic concern, short texts with pictures, short
description of the text which will be listened to, short dialogue, situation, a model of
dialogue. Based on the previous data analysis, it shows that the inputs used in this
developed material are acceptable. The students were enthusiastic with the inputs.
designing the task inputs of the material for the first students of SMP.
theory who says that the activities should represent the ‘real world’ life, as in reading
activity, one of the reading purposes that should be achieved is to obtain a specific
fact or piece of information (Clark and Silberstein, 1977: 51 in Nunan, 2004: 53).
Therefore, the designed activities for oral cycle (Focus on listening and speaking) are
dialogue and having a dialogue based on the clues or given situation. Meanwhile, the
activities for written cycle (Focus on reading and writing) are reading and finding
some difficult words, reading and answering, studying the explanation, and writing
short functional texts. As the result, those activities were acceptable. In other words,
the theory could be applied in designing the activities for the first grade students of
SMP.
In relation to the teacher and learner roles, there are some roles that they
should play within the classroom. The role may change from one activity to another.
Based on Harmer (2001), Brown (2001), and Breen and Candlin in Nunan (2004), the
However, Nunan (2004: 67) emphasizes that teacher and learner roles are two side of
coin. It means that their roles should support one to another. When the learners
perform to be the active participants, then the teacher should adjust the role to support
them. In other words, their roles are interchangeable. Based on the data on the
previous section of this chapter, it shows that the teacher roles during the
implementation were effective. In short, the theories are effective as the consideration
for the teacher to decide which role she has to play in the classroom.
Pertaining to task setting, the pair work is frequently used in the tasks. The
using of many pair work group is based on Harmer (2001: 116) who states that the
students can practice language together, study a text, and take part in information-gap
activities as active as possible in pair work group. However, it seems that the students
like to do the tasks in groups. It is in line with Harmer (2001) who proposes that
group work encourages broader skills of cooperation and negotiation. They are also
given some part of the tasks at home as homework. It is based on Nunan’s theory
(2004: 70-71) who says that setting also needs several consideration on whether the
tasks are to be carried out wholly or partly outside the classroom. Meanwhile, from
the previous data analysis shows that the settings during the implementation are
effective.