Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017 Ccoc
2017 Ccoc
95]
Correspondence
Cite this article as: Datar UV, Kamat MS, Kanitkar SS, Byakodi SS. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: A rare case report
with emphasis on differential diagnosis. J Can Res Ther 2017;13:374-7.
374 © 2017 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
[Downloaded free from http://www.cancerjournal.net on Saturday, August 7, 2021, IP: 157.33.244.95]
clear cells were Periodic acid–Schiff positive and diastase Biphasic type is the most common histological pattern
labile [Figure 3]. The cells were negative for mucicarmine stain. that shows two distinctive cell population namely clear
The tumor cells were immunoreactive for pancytokeratin, cells and basaloid cells. The “clear cells” show abundant
epithelial membrane antigen p63. The tumor cells were clear to faintly eosinophilic cytoplasm, distinct cell
nonreactive for S100, vimentin, desmin, alpha smooth muscle membrane, central/eccentric uniform dark staining nuclei,
actin (SMA), calponin, and calretinin. Ki 67 [mib1] proliferation and lack significant pleomorphism and mitotic activity.[1,3,8]
index was 40% [Figure 4]. With the histopathological features The other cell type is dark staining basaloid cells with
and immunohistochemical profile, the diagnosis of CCOC was scant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Monophasic pattern consists
established, and surgical resection was planned. entirely of clear cells. Ameloblastomatous pattern is least
common with the presence of clear cells centrally and
DISCUSSION peripherally palisaded ameloblast‑like cells. [3‑7] Rarely,
a combination of different histologic patterns can be
CCOC is a rare odontogenic tumor. The histogenesis of CCOC is encountered.[7] In the present case, predominantly biphasic
unclear literature suggests that clear cells in jaw lesions originate pattern was noted, but focally ameloblastomatous pattern
from dental lamina or cell rests of Malassez.[2] It is suggested was evident [Figure 2c and d].
that the presence of clear cells is an attempt to recapitulate
the presecretory phase of ameloblast with the accumulation
of glycogen.[6] Literature review reveals that CCOC commonly
occurs in the sixth decade of life (range 17–89 years).[8] CCOC
characteristically has female preponderance with male:female
ratio 1:1.8 and affects mandible more frequently than maxilla.[5]
Clinically, it presents as asymptomatic, slow growing swelling
of long duration with a mean size of 4 cm in diameter; however, a b
cases with pain, tooth mobility, paresthesia, and nonhealing
ulcerations have been reported.[3] Radiographically, CCOC
manifests as either unilocular or multilocular radiolucency
which may be well or poorly demarcated.[5] In the present case,
a well‑defined, well corticated, unilocular radiolucency with
divergence of associated teeth was observed.
c d
Histopathologically, CCOC demonstrates three distinct patterns Figure 2: (a) Photomicrograph showing tumor cells arranged
namely biphasic, monophasic, and ameloblastomatous. in form of islands and chords in hyalinized connective tissue
stroma (H and E, ×4), (b) tumor islands showing biphasic pattern
with centrally placed clear cells and peripheral basaloid cells
(H and E, ×10), (c) tumor islands showing peripheral ameloblast‑like
cells (H and E, ×40), (d) photomicrograph showing central clear cells
with centric small basophilic nucleus, distinct cell membrane and clear
cytoplasm (H and E, ×40)
a b
Figure 1: (a) Intraoral photograph of well defined, dome shaped
swelling in the mandibular anterior region, (b) orthopantomogram
showing well corticated, unilocular radiolucency extending from tooth
33 to tooth 43
a b
a b c d
Figure 3: (a) Photomicrograph depicting clear cells with Periodic acid– Figure 4: (a) Photomicrograph of intense cytokeratin expression by
Schiff positive granules (Periodic acid–Schiff, ×40), (b) photomicrograph tumor cells (×40), (b) photomicrograph of moderate expression of
showing diastase labile clear cells (Periodic acid–Schiff with epithelial membrane antigen by tumor cells (×40), (c) Ki 67 positive
diastase, ×40) tumor cells (×40), (d) strong expression of p63 by tumor cells (×40)
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - Volume 13 - Issue 2 - April-June 2017 375
[Downloaded free from http://www.cancerjournal.net on Saturday, August 7, 2021, IP: 157.33.244.95]
Clear cells are hallmark but not the pathognomonic feature of Absence of amyloid and Liesegang’s ring calcification in the
CCOC. They are noted in odontogenic, salivary, melanotic, renal, present case negated the possibility of CCCEOT. Lack of mucin
thyroid, and prostate tumors. Thus, the differential diagnosis of and negative staining for S100, alpha SMA, vimentin, and
CCOC evokes a broad range of tumors with diverse histogenesis calponin ruled out CCMEC.[5,10,11] Intraosseous location with
and biological behavior. The differentiation of these tumors central bone destruction, presence of palisaded peripheral cells,
is confounding because of the considerable overlap in their differentiated the present case from CCC.[6] Absence of sinusoidal
histologic features, thus posing a diagnostic challenge.[10,11] vascularity, intramural hemorrhage, noncontributory findings
The differential diagnoses for CCOC include clear cell variant of of USG abdomen and chest radiographs ruled out the possibility
calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CCCEOT), ameloblastic of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.[13]
carcinoma, intraosseous variant of clear cell mucoepidermoid
carcinoma (CCMEC), hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (CCC), Till date, only one report has evaluated the proliferative index
intraosseous variant of melanoma, metastatic tumors from of CCOC to be 35.2 cells per high power field (HPF), in the
kidney, thyroid, and prostate [Table 1].[4‑13] present case the proliferative index was 40 cells per HPF.[3] A
376 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - Volume 13 - Issue 2 - April-June 2017
[Downloaded free from http://www.cancerjournal.net on Saturday, August 7, 2021, IP: 157.33.244.95]
recent literature review[3] suggests that CCOC has potential for Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck
multiple recurrences (41%), metastasis (31%), thus demanding Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005. p. 292.
2. Walia C, Chatterjee RP, Kundu S, Roy S. Clinical enigma: A rare
an aggressive treatment approach and long‑term surveillance.
case of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. Contemp Clin Dent
Surgical resection with wide margins is the treatment of choice 2015;6:559‑63.
for CCOC, with adjuvant radiotherapy for cases showing 3. Loyola AM, Cardoso SV, de Faria PR, Servato JP, Barbosa de Paulo LF,
perivascular and perineural invasion. The cases treated initially Eisenberg AL, et al. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: Report of 7
with conservative surgery showed higher recurrence rate as new cases and systematic review of the current knowledge. Oral
compared to those treated with surgical resection (86.7% Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;120:483‑96.
4. Ganvir SM, Gajbhiye NY. An unusual presentation of clear cell
vs. 29%).[9] Hence, CCOC is now considered as a high grade
odontogenic carcinoma in mandibular anterior region. J Oral
odontogenic malignancy. Maxillofac Pathol 2014;18:442‑8.
5. Swain N, Dhariwal R, Ray JG. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma of
CONCLUSION maxilla: A case report and mini review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol
2013;17:89‑94.
Differentiating CCOC from other clear cell tumors of head and 6. Bilodeau EA, Hoschar AP, Barnes EL, Hunt JL, Seethala RR. Clear cell
carcinoma and clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: A comparative
neck is crucial. Clinical presentation and histopathological
clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Head Neck Pathol
pattern primarily aided in the diagnosis of CCOC in our case. 2011;5:101‑7.
Special stains and immunoprofiling acted as an adjuvant to 7. Avninder S, Rakheja D, Bhatnagar A. Clear cell odontogenic
rule out the other clear cell tumors. CCOC warrants a close carcinoma: A diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. World J Surg Oncol
and long‑term follow‑up since it has a low survival rate and 2006;4:91.
recurrence and metastasis were reported as late as 20 years 8. Slater LJ. Odontogenic malignancies. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North
Am 2004;16:409‑24.
after first intervention.
9. Kalsi AS, Williams SP, Shah KA, Fasanmade A. Clear cell odontogenic
carcinoma: A rare neoplasm of the maxillary bone. J Oral Maxillofac
Financial support and sponsorship Surg 2014;72:935‑8.
Nil. 10. Premalatha BR, Rao RS, Patil S, Neethi H. Clear cell tumours of the
head and neck. An overview. World J Dent 2012;3:344‑9.
Conflicts of interest 11. Said‑Al‑Naief N, Klein MJ. Clear cell entities of the head and neck:
A selective review of clear cell tumors of the salivary glands. Head
There are no conflicts of interest.
Neck Pathol 2008;2:111‑5.
12. Chen CY, Wu CW, Wang WC, Lin LM, Chen YK. Clear‑cell variant of
REFERENCES calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (Pindborg tumor) in the
mandible. Int J Oral Sci 2013;5:115‑9.
1. Bang G, Koppang H. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. In Barnes L, 13. Will TA, Agarwal N, Petruzzelli GJ. Oral cavity metastasis of renal
Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky, editors. World Health Organization cell carcinoma: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2008;2:313.
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - Volume 13 - Issue 2 - April-June 2017 377