Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form - PMCF

Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS)
The Department of Education (DepEd) is committed to provide the members of its organization with
opportunities to:
 Link their individual achievements and make a meaningful contribution to the attainment of the institution’s
Vision and Mission.
 Promote individual and team growth, participation and commitment.
 Grow professionally and personally.

In line with this Philosophy, DepEd implements a Results-Based Performance Management System. It is a shared undertaking
between the superior and the employee that allows an open discussion of job expectations, Key Results Areas, Objectives and
how these align to overall departmental goals. It provides a venue for agreement on standards of performance and behaviors
which lead to professional and personal growth in the organization.
This form is divided into four parts:
PART I Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives - Each employee plays a vital part in the achievement of his/her department’s
objectives. At the beginning of the Results-Based Performance Management Cycle, the employee and his/her superior jointly
determines goal and measures that will lead to the achievement of the overall departmental goals. After which, weights are
assigned to those goals based on priorities. The total of the weights should not exceed 100. At the end of the performance cycle,
the employee is rated on the effectiveness/quality, efficiency (including cost), and timeliness in delivering the goals agreed upon.
PART II Competencies - The success of the employee in fulfilling his/her role and delivering exceptional
performance is dependent on how s/he applies various competencies on the job. The employee is rated based on
the effectiveness and consistency by which s/he demonstrates behaviors relevant to the competencies. The overall
rating is computed by adding the rating for each competency and dividing the sum by the total number of
competencies. Half-points (e.g. 3.5) may be given if the employee’s performance level falls in between descriptions
of the scale positions.
PART III Summary of Ratings for Discussion
PART IV Development Plans - The areas where the employee excels and areas for development are both identified.
In this manner, the employee’s strengths are highlighted and recognized. Development needs on the other hand
are addressed through formal and informal training and development approaches.
Scale Adjectival Description

5
Outstanding (5)
(97.50% and above)
Performance represents an extraordinary level of achievement and commitment in terms of quality and time,
technical skills and knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and initiative. Employees at this performance level should have
demonstrated exceptional job mastery in all major areas of responsibility. Employee achievement and contributions
to the organization are of marked excellence.
Very Satisfactory (4)

(86.25% to 97.49%)
Performance exceeded expectations. All goals, objectives and targets were achieved above the established
standards.
Satisfactory (3)
(75% to 86.24%)
Performance met expectations in terms of quality of work, efficiency and timelines. The most critical annual goals
were met.
Unsatisfactory(2)
(37.5% 74.99%)
Performance failed to meet expectations, and / or one or more of the most critical goals were not met.
Poor
(0 to 37.49 %)
Performance was consistently below expectations, and/or reasonable progress towards critical goals was not made.
Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.
These ratings refer to the accomplishment of targets or objectives. Evaluation should be based on indicators and
measures. CSC MC NO. 13, SERIES OF 1999 (REVISED Polices on the Performance Management System) have the
following descriptions:
Outstanding – performance exceeding targets by 30% and above of the planned targets on the previous definition
of performance exceeding targets by at least fifty (50%)
Very Satisfactory – performance exceeding targets by 15% to 29% of the planned targets; from the previous range
of performance exceeding targets by at least 25% but falls short of what is considered an outstanding performance.
Satisfactory – performance of 100% to 114% of the planned targets. For accomplishments requiring 100% of the
targets such as those pertaining to money or accuracy or those which may no longer be exceeded, the usual rating
of either 10 for those who met targets or 4 for those who failed or fell short of the targets shall still be enforced.
Unsatisfactory – performance of 51% to 99% of the planned targets; and

Poor – performance failing to meet the planned targets by 50% or below.
Appeals
A Performance Review Committee (PRC) shall be created is DepEd composed of the Undersecretary for Regional
Operations, Assistant Secretary for Planning, highest ranking official in charge of personnel management and two
representatives from the rank and file nominated by the accredited employee association in the agency as
members.
1. Employees who feel aggrieved or dissatisfied with their final performance rating can file an appeal with the PRC
within ten (10) days from date of receipt of their Performance Report Form from the PRC. Employees, however,
shall not be allowed to protest the performance rating of their co-employees. Ratings obtained by other employees
can only be used as basis or reference for comparison in appealing one’s performance rating;
2. The PRC shall decide on the appeals within one month from receipt. Appeals lodged at any PRC shall follow the
hierarchical jurisdiction of various PRCs in an agency. For example, the decision of the Provincial PRC is appealable
to the Regional PRC which decision is in turn appealable to the National/Central Office PRC. Only in exceptional
instances when the decision of the PRC in the central offices of departments may be appealed further to the CSC
Commission proper. The decision made on employees’ ratings by the PRC in the local government units maybe
appealed to the Civil service Regional Office which has jurisdiction over these units.
3. An official or employee who was separated from the service on the basis of unsatisfactory or poor performance
rating can appeal his separation to the CSC or its regional office within 15 days from receipt of the order or notice of
separation.
INSTRUCTIONS
Please follow the following:
1. Enter the necessary data on the required field such as Name, position and others on the IPCRF WORKSHEET
PLANNING PHASE sheet. (the rest of the sheets will be filled-in automatically)
2. During evaluation phase, utilized the sheet, IPCRF WORKSHEET EVALUATION PHASE. This time enter the actual rating
based on the actual performance of the teacher or the ratee. Below the worksheet there is a table to generate automatically the
rating based on performance. To do this enter on the required field the Total No. Required and the Actual No. Attended/Complied.
The rating will be generated automatically. This rating will be encoded on the corresponding objectives under Actual Results. The
rest of the fields are protected.(you can't enter any variable on protected fields) Once finished, print the pages using legal size
bond paper.
3. Proceed now to Part II (Competencies). Tick the required fields which corresponds to the rating of the ratee/teacher. Tick only
one (1) field.A green colored-boxes will appear if correctly done. Red when two or more fields for one competency were ticked.
Gray if unticked. Once completed, print part II.
4. Print the sheet FOR PRINTING FRONT then FOR PRINTING BACK.
5. Accomplished PART III and Part IV
6. Once done, have it sign by the corresponding personnel (Rater and the Approving Authority).
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of EmployMA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA Name of Rater: MYLEN C. GEROMO
Position: TEACHER-I Position: HT-3
Review Period: JUN.2016-MAR.2017 Date of Review: APRIL 12, 2017
School/Division: MONTEVERDE ES/ CEBU PROVINCE
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING PHASE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

WEIGHT PER
MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE TARGET RATING SCORE
KRA
5 pts. 4 pts. 3 pts. 2 pts. 1 pt.
97.50% and above of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99%of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
86.25% to 97.49% of
A.1 Lesson plans utilized the lessons utilized lesson utilized lesson utilized lessons utilized
the lesson utilized
Teaching- differentiated techniques and June2015- differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
techniques and 3.5
Learning Process strategies in teaching varied types of March 2016 techniques and techniques and techniques and techniques and
strategies in teaching
learners. strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching
varied types of learners
varied types of learners varied learners varied learners varied learners
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
A.2 Lesson plans utilized the lesson plans utilized the lesson plans utilized lesson plans utilized lesson plans utilized lesson plans utilized
June2015-
differentiated activities for various differentiated acivities differentiated activities differentiated activities differentiated activities differentiated activities 3.5
March 2016
types of learners. for various types of for various types of for various types of for various types of for various types of
learners learner learners learners learners
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of

75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of lesson
the lessons used the lesson used
A.3 Lesson plans used various lesson used technology lesson used technology used technology and
June2015- technology and technology and
technology and instructional materials and instructional and instructional instructional materials 3.5
March 2016 instructional instructional materials
appropriate for the subject matter. materials appropriate materials appropriate appropriate with the
materialsappropriate for appropriate with the
with the subject matter with the subject matter subject matter
the subject matter subject matter
B.1 Daily lesson/log/instructional
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of lesson 0 to 37.49 % and of the
plans prepared had the following: June2015-
Lesson Planning lesson plans followed lesson plans followed lesson plans followed plans followed the lesson plans followed 3.5
objectives(KSA), and procedure(3P's March 2016
the approved format the approved format the approved format approved format the approved format
and 2A's)
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24%of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % and of the
B.2 Learning units/competencies the learning units are the learning units are learning units are learning units are learning units are
June2015- 3.5
were arranged sequentially with arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially
March 2016
reasonable time allotment. with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time
allotment allotment allotment allotment properly allotment
86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the
97.50% and above of the lesson plan used lesson plan used 0 to 37.49 % of the
37.5% 74.99% of the
B.3 Learning objectives used were June2015- the lesson plans used objectives taken from objectives taken from lesson plan used
lesson used objectives 3.5
aligned with PELC/PSLC/CG March 2016 objectives taken from ELC/SLCand varied ELC/SLCand varied objectives taken from
taken from ELC/SLC
the ELC/SLC assessments were assessments were ELC/SLC
appropriately used appropriately used
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of 0 to 37.49 % of

37.5% 74.99% of pupils/
B.4 75% of the pupils/students the pupils/students pupils/ students were pupils/ students were pupils/students were
students were guided in
observed classroom rules, guidelines, were guided in the guided in the guided in the guided in the
the observation of
individual and group tasks within the June2015- observation of observation of observation of observation of
classroom rules and 3.5
rating period as evidenced by March 2016 classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced
descriptive ratings in report guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in
cards/journals by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in
report card/journal
report card/journal report card/journal report card/journal report card/journal
Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and
C.1 Conducted Pre-test and Post-test in
Pupils/Students June2015- Post-test in 97.50% and Post-test in 86.25% to Post-test in 75% to Post-test in 37.5% Post-test in 0 to 37.49 %
75% of subject areas with analysis of 3.5
Outcomes March 2016 above of subject areas 97.49% of subject areas 86.24% of subject areas 74.99% of subject areas of subject areas with
results
with analysis of results with analysis of result with analysis of results with analysis of results analysis of results
C.2 Class Records reflected

developmental test results in all
subject areas per grading period with 97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% 75% to 86.24% of 37.5% 74.99% of 0 to 37.49 % of learners'
the following composition: learners' developmental learners' developmental learners' developmental learners' developmental developmental test
June2015-
Knowledge -5 test results results were test results results were test results results were test results results were results results were 3.5
March 2016
Process -5 reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class
Understanding - 5 Records Records Records Records Records
Performance
-1
Report Cards were Report Cards were Report Cards were Report Cards were
C.3 Report Cards were issued two June2015- Report Cards were
issued ahead of target issued one to three days issued four to five days issued more than five 3.5
weeks after the periodic test. March 2016 issued on time
time after target time. after target time. days after target time.
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of 37.5% 74.99% of 0 to 37.49 % of
pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students
C.4 Pupils/students accomplishments June2015-
accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is 3.5
were contained in his/her portfolio March 2016
contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her
portfolio portfolio portfolio portfolio portfolio
Remediation Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/

Activities to D.1 Conducted /enrichment program enrichment program enrichment program enrichment program enrichment program
Improve remediation/enrichment June2015- were offered to 97.50% were offered to86.25% were offered to 75% to were offered to 37.5% were offered to 0 to
3.5
Performance activity/program to 75% of the March 2016 and above of to 97.49% of 86.24% of 74.99% of 37.49 % of
Indicators pupils/students that need it. pupils/students who pupils/students who pupils/students who pupils/students who pupils/students who
need it need it need it need it need it
June2015- Attained 97.50% and Attained 86.25% to Attained 75% to 86.24% Attained 51% to 99% of Attained 0 to 37.49 % of
D.2 Attained the required NAT MPS 3.5
March 2016 above of NAT MPS 97.49% of the NAT MPS of the NAT MPS the NAT MPS the NAT MPS
D.3 Maintained a safe, clean and Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
June2015-
orderly classroom conducive to observed at least 3 observed at least 4 to 5 observed at least 6 to 8 observed at least 9 to 10 observed for more than 3.5
March 2016
learning. times times times times 10 times
Participated in 97.50% Participated in 86.25% Participated in 75% to Participated in 51% to Participated in 0 to

D.4 Participated in 75% of the school, and above of school, to 97.49% of school, 86.24%of the the 99% of the the school, 37.49 % of the the
June2015-
district, and division curricular and district, and division district, and division school, district, and district, and division school, district, and 3.5
March 2016
non-curricular activities. curricular and non- curricular and non- division curricular and curricular and non- division curricular and
curricular activities. curricular activities. non-curricular activities. curricular activities. non-curricular activities.
E.1 Conducted home visits (with
Guidance and June2015- the required home visits the required home visits required home visits required home visits required home visits
focus to PARDO's/SARDO's) per month 3.5
Counseling March 2016 were conducted with were conducted with were conducted with were conducted with were conducted with
with documentation.
documentation documentation. documentation. documentation. documentation.
E.2 Pupils/students observed

classroom rules, guidelines individual Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
June2015-
and group tasks within the rating observed at least 3 observed at least 4 to 5 observed at least 6 to 8 observed at least 9 to 10 observed for more than 3.5
March 2016
period as evidenced by descriptive times times times times 10 times
ratings in report cards/journals
F.1 Organized functional Homeroom June2015- the parents have filled- the parents have filled- parents have filled-up parents have filled-up parents have filled-up
3.5
PTA March 2016 up membership form of up membership form of membership form of membership form of membership form of
Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA
Conducted at least 10 Conducted at least 8 Conducted at least 6 Conducted at least 4 Conducted less than 4
F.2 Conducted periodic PTA June2015- PTA PTA meetings/ PTA meetings/ PTA PTA meetings/
3.5
meetings/conferences March 2016 meeting/conferences conferences with conferences with meetings/conferences conferences with
with documentation documentation documentation with documentation documentation
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of the 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
F.3 Undertaken/ Initiated projects /
the initiated projects initiated projects with initiated projects with initiated projects with initiated projects with
events/ activities with external June2015- 3.5
with external funding external funding was external funding was external funding was external funding was
funding/ sponsorship within the target March 2016
was accomplished with accomplished with accomplished with accomplished with accomplished but with
date
report on completion report on completion report on completion report on completion report on completion
F.4 Participated/Attended in at least

Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
75% of LGU initiated activities (e.g. June2015-
observed at least 3 observed at least 4 to 5 observed at least 6 to 8 observed at least 9 to 10 observed for more than 3.5
Rizal Day, Independence Day March 2016
times times times times 10 times
celebration, festivals)
Conducted at least 1
Conducted at least 1 Conducted at least 1
action reasearch in a Conducted at least 1
action reasearch in a action reasearch in a
Professional school year and results action reasearch in a
H.1 Conducted at least one action June2015- school year and results school year and results Has not conducted 3.5
Growth and were school year and results
research in a school year. March 2016 were were action research.
Development implemented/adopted were not
implemented/adopted implemented/adopted
by the implemented/adopted.
by the the school. by the grade/level.
district/municipality.
Produced at least 2
Produced at least 1 Produced at least 1 Produced at least 2
I.1 Produced publication/creative work publication/creative
June2015- publication/creative publication/creative publication/creative Unpublished work
for school paper/ division/regional/ work in 3.5
March 2016 work in national work in regional work in school produced
national publication district/municipal
publication publication publication
publication
Attended at least 32 Attended at least 24 Attended at least 16

I.2 Participated in trainings, seminars, Attended at least 40 Attended at least 0 to 8
hours but less than 40 hours but less than 32 hours but less than 24
conferences and LAC sessions hours of in-Service hours of in-Service 3.5
hours of in-Service hours of in-Service hours of in-Service
conducted on the level Training per semester Training per semester
Training per semester Training per semester Training per semester
Not more than 6 times 7 to 14 times 15 to 22 times 23 to 30 times more than 30 times
K.1 Punctuality tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a 3.5
school year school year school year school year school year
Not more than 4 days 5 to 8 days absent in a 9 to 12 days absent in a 13 to 16 days absent in more than 16 days
K.2 Attendance 3.5
absent in a school year school year school year a school year absent in a school year
a. Chaired technical committee

School level
b. Conducted seminars in the
school/district level
c. Acted as
Only 3 indicators were Only 2 indicators were
Plus Factor trainer/facilitator in the All indicators were met
met met
Only 1 indicator was met No indicator was met 3.5
division/ regional/ national
level d.
Acquired resources assistance
for the class/school from other
sources
MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA MYLEN C. GEROMO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
DepEd RPMS Form- Teacher

Part I. INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee: MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA Name of Rater: MYLEN C. GEROMO
School/Division: MONTEVERDE ES/ CEBU PROVINCE
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION PHASE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT RATING SCORE
PER KRA
5 pts. 4 pts. 3 pts. 2 pts. 1 pt. Q E T AVERAGE
97.50% and above of the 75% to 86.24% of the

86.25% to 97.49% of 37.5% 74.99%of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
A.1 75 % of the Lesson plans lessons utilized lesson utilized
the lesson utilized lesson utilized lessons utilized
Teaching-Learning utilized differentiated techniques June2016- differentiated differentiated
Process and strategies in teaching varied March 2017 techniques and
techniques and
techniques and
differentiated techniques differentiated techniques 4 3 4 3.67 3 0.129
strategies in teaching and strategies in teaching and strategies in teaching
types of learners. strategies in teaching strategies in teaching
varied types of learners varied learners varied learners
varied types of learners varied learners
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the lesson
A.2 75 % of the Lesson plans the lesson plans utilized the lesson plans utilized lesson plans utilized lesson plans utilized plans utilized
June2016-
0 utilized differentiated activities for
March 2017
differentiated acivities differentiated activities differentiated activities differentiated activities differentiated activities 4 4 4 4.00 3 0.129
various types of learners. for various types of for various types of for various types of for various types of for various types of
learners learner learners learners learners
86.25% to 97.49% of
97.50% and above of the 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of lesson
A.3 75 % of the Lesson plans used the lesson used
lessons used technology lesson used technology lesson used technology used technology and
various technology and June2016- technology and
0
instructional materials appropriate March 2017
and instructional
instructional materials
and instructional and instructional instructional materials 4 3 4 3.67 3 0.129
materialsappropriate for materials appropriate materials appropriate appropriate with the
for the subject matter. appropriate with the
the subject matter with the subject matter with the subject matter subject matter
subject matter
B.1 Daily lesson/log/instructional
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of lesson 0 to 37.49 % and of the
plans prepared had the following: June2016-
Lesson Planning
objectives(KSA), and March 2017
lesson plans followed lesson plans followed lesson plans followed plans followed the lesson plans followed the 4 4 4 4.00 3 0.129
the approved format the approved format the approved format approved format approved format
procedure(3P's and 2A's) 30%
97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24%of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % and of the
B.2 Learning units/competencies learning units are the learning units are learning units are learning units are learning units are
June2016-
0 were arranged sequentially with
March 2017
arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially arranged sequentially 4 4 4 4.00 3 0.129
reasonable time allotment. with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time with reasonable time
allotment allotment allotment allotment properly allotment
86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the
97.50% and above of the the lesson plan used lesson plan used 0 to 37.49 % of the
37.5% 74.99% of the
B.3 Learning objectives used June2016- lesson plans used objectives taken from objectives taken from lesson plan used
0
were aligned with PELC/PSLC/CG March 2017 objectives taken from ELC/SLCand varied ELC/SLCand varied
lesson used objectives
objectives taken from 5 4 4 4.33 4 0.171
taken from ELC/SLC
the ELC/SLC assessments were assessments were ELC/SLC
appropriately used appropriately used
97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of

37.5% 74.99% of pupils/ 0 to 37.49 % of
B.4 75% of the pupils/students pupils/students were pupils/ students were pupils/ students were
students were guided in pupils/students were
observed classroom rules, guided in the guided in the guided in the
the observation of guided in the observation
guidelines, individual and group June2016- observation of observation of observation of
0
tasks within the rating period as March 2017 classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and
classroom rules and of classroom rules and 4 4 4 4.00 3 0.129
guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced
evidenced by descriptive ratings in guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced guidelines as evidenced
by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in
report cards/journals by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in
report card/journal report card/journal
report card/journal report card/journal report card/journal
Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and Conducted Pre-test and
C.1 Conducted Pre-test and Post-
Pupils/Students June2016- Post-test in 97.50% and Post-test in 86.25% to Post-test in 75% to Post-test in 37.5% 74.99% Post-test in 0 to 37.49 %
Outcomes
test in 75% of subject areas with
March 2017 above of subject areas 97.49% of subject areas 86.24% of subject areas of subject areas with of subject areas with 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
analysis of results
with analysis of results with analysis of result with analysis of results analysis of results analysis of results
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% 75% to 86.24% of 37.5% 74.99% of learners' 0 to 37.49 % of learners'
C.2 Class Records reflected 10
learners' developmental learners' developmental learners' developmental developmental test developmental test
formative and 1 summative test in June2016-
0
all subject areas per grading March 2017
test results results were test results results were test results results were results results were results results were 4 4 4 4.00 3 0.090
reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class reflected in the Class
period
Records Records Records Records Records
Report Cards were Report Cards were Report Cards were issued Report Cards were issued
C.3 Report Cards were issued two June2016- Report Cards were
0
weeks after the periodic test. March 2017
issued ahead of target
issued on time
issued one to three days four to five days after more than five days after 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
time after target time. target time. target time.
97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of 37.5% 74.99% of 0 to 37.49 % of
C.4 Pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students pupils/students
June2016-
0 accomplishments were contained
March 2017
accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is accomplishment is 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
in his/her portfolio contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her contained in his/her
portfolio portfolio portfolio portfolio portfolio
Remediation Remediation/ Remediation/

Remediation/ enrichment Remediation/ enrichment
Activities to D.1 Conducted /enrichment program enrichment program enrichment program
program were offered to program were offered to
Improve remediation/enrichment June2016- were offered to 97.50% were offered to86.25% were offered to 75% to
Performance activity/program to 75% of the March 2017 and above of to 97.49% of 86.24% of
37.5% 74.99% of 0 to 37.49 % of 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
pupils/students who need pupils/students who need
Indicators pupils/students that need it. pupils/students who pupils/students who pupils/students who
it it
30% need it need it need it
June2016- Attained 97.50% and Attained 86.25% to Attained 75% to 86.24% Attained 51% to 99% of Attained 0 to 37.49 % of
0 D.2 Attained the required NAT MPS
March 2017 above of NAT MPS 97.49% of the NAT MPS of the NAT MPS the NAT MPS the NAT MPS 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
D.3 Maintained a safe, clean and Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
June2016-
0 orderly classroom conducive to
March 2017
observed at least 3 observed at least 4 to 5 observed at least 6 to 8 observed at least 9 to 10 observed for more than 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
learning. times times times times 10 times
Participated in 97.50% Participated in 86.25% Participated in 75% to Participated in 51% to Participated in 0 to 37.49
D.4 Participated in 75% of the
and above of school, to 97.49% of school, 86.24%of the the school, 99% of the the school, % of the the school,
school, district, and division June2016-
0
curricular and non-curricular March 2017
district, and division district, and division district, and division district, and division district, and division 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
curricular and non- curricular and non- curricular and non- curricular and non- curricular and non-
activities.
curricular activities. curricular activities. curricular activities. curricular activities. curricular activities.
97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
E.1 Conducted home visits (with
Guidance and June2016- required home visits the required home visits required home visits required home visits were required home visits were
Counseling
focus to PARDO's/SARDO's) per
March 2017 were conducted with were conducted with were conducted with conducted with conducted with 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
month with documentation.
documentation documentation. documentation. documentation. documentation.
E.2 Pupils/students observed

classroom rules, guidelines
Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
individual and group tasks within June2016-
0
the rating period as evidenced by March 2017
times times times times 10 times
descriptive ratings in report
cards/journals
97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
F.1 Organized functional June2016- parents have filled-up the parents have filled- parents have filled-up parents have filled-up parents have filled-up
0
Homeroom PTA March 2017 membership form of up membership form of membership form of membership form of membership form of 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.250
Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA Homeroom PTA
Conducted at least 10 Conducted at least 8 Conducted at least 6 Conducted less than 4

Conducted at least 4 PTA
F.2 Conducted periodic PTA June2016- PTA PTA meetings/ PTA meetings/ PTA meetings/
0
meetings/conferences March 2017 meeting/conferences conferences with conferences with
meetings/conferences
conferences with 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.250
with documentation
with documentation documentation documentation documentation
20%
97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of the 75% to 86.24% of the 37.5% 74.99% of the 0 to 37.49 % of the
F.3 Undertaken/ Initiated projects
initiated projects with initiated projects with initiated projects with initiated projects with initiated projects with
/ events/ activities with external June2016-
0
funding/ sponsorship within the March 2017
external funding was external funding was external funding was external funding was external funding was 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.250
accomplished with accomplished with accomplished with accomplished with report accomplished but with
target date
report on completion report on completion report on completion on completion report on completion
F.4 Participated/Attended in at
least 75% of LGU initiated Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not Indicators were not
June2016-
0 activities (e.g. Rizal Day,
March 2017
Independence Day celebration, times times times times 10 times
festivals)
Conducted at least 1
Conducted at least 1 Conducted at least 1
action reasearch in a Conducted at least 1
action reasearch in a action reasearch in a
Professional school year and results action reasearch in a
H.1 Conducted at least one action June2016- school year and results school year and results Has not conducted action
Growth and
research in a school year. March 2017
were
were were
school year and results
research. 2 2 2 2.00 2 0.060
Development implemented/adopted were not
implemented/adopted implemented/adopted
by the implemented/adopted.
by the the school. by the grade/level.
district/municipality.
Produced at least 2
I.1 Produced publication/creative Produced at least 1 Produced at least 1
publication/creative Produced at least 2
work for school paper/ June2016- publication/creative publication/creative Unpublished work
0
division/regional/ national March 2017 work in national work in regional
work in publication/creative work
produced 1 1 1 1.00 1 0.030
district/municipal in school publication
publication publication publication
publication
15%
Attended at least 32 Attended at least 24 Attended at least 16 hours
I.2 Participated in trainings, Attended at least 40 Attended at least 0 to 8
June2016- hours but less than 40 hours but less than 32 but less than 24 hours of
0 seminars, conferences and LAC
March 2017
hours of in-Service
hours of in-Service hours of in-Service in-Service Training per
hours of in-Service 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
sessions conducted on the level Training per semester Training per semester
Training per semester Training per semester semester
Not more than 6 times 7 to 14 times 15 to 22 times 23 to 30 times more than 30 times
0 K.1 Punctuality tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a tardy/undertime in a 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
school year school year school year school year school year
Not more than 4 days 5 to 8 days absent in a 9 to 12 days absent in a 13 to 16 days absent in a more than 16 days absent
K.2 Attendance
absent in a school year school year school year school year in a school year 5 5 5 5.00 5 0.150
a. Chaired technical committee

School level b.
Conducted seminars in the
school/district level
c. Acted as trainer/facilitator in Only 3 indicators were Only 2 indicators were
Plus Factor
the division/ regional/ national
5% All indicators were met
met met
Only 1 indicator was met No indicator was met 1 1 1 1.00 1 0.050
level d.
Acquired resources assistance for
the class/school from other
sources
OVERALL RATING 3.97

DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory
MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA MYLEN C. GEROMO
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Name of Employee: MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA
Legend:
Position: TEACHER-I RM- Role Model
CD- Consistently Demonstrates
Review Period: JUN.2016-MAR.2017 MD- Most of the time Demonstrates
School/Division: MONTEVERDE ES/ CEBU PROVINCE SD - Sometimes Demonstrates
RD - Rarely Demonstrates
Part II. C O M P E T E N C I E S
Indicator 1 Self Management
RM CD MD SD RD Rating
1 1. Sets personal needs, goals, and directions toward personal development. ✘
2 2. Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. ✘
3 3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. ✘ 3.4
4 4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through ghantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. ✘
5 5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. ✘
###
Indicator 2 Professionalism and Ethics ###
1 1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713). ✘
2 2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions on others. ✘
3 3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, punctual and regular in attendance, well-groomed and a good communicator. ✘ 3.2
4 4. Makes personal sacrifices(reporting to school on Saturdays and Holidays) to meet the organization’s needs. ✘
5 5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness. ✘
###
Indicator 3 Result Focus ###
1 1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. ✘
2 2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs. ✘
3 3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work In terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no
supervision required.
✘ 3.8
4 4. Expresses desire to do better and frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. ✘
5 5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal. ✘
###
Indicator 4 Teamwork ###
1 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. ✘ ✘
2 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the organization. ✘ ✘
3 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. ✘

4.0
4 4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. ✘
5 5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. ✘
✘
Indicator 5 Service Orientation ###

1 1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems ✘
2 2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns. ✘
3 3. Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment. ✘ 3.6
4 4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions. ✘
5 5. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery. ✘
###
Indicator 6 Innovation ###
H S F L L Rating
1 1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency). ✘
2 2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. ✘
3 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co – workers to develop original ideas or solutions. ✘ 3.0
4 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and organization. ✘
5 5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities.Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. ✘
###
Indicator7 Achievement ###
1 1. Enjoys working hard. ✘
2 2. Is action – oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as challenging. ✘
3 3. Is not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning. ✘ 5.0

4 4. Seizes more opportunities than others. ✘
5 5. Is a strategic thinker. ✘
###
Indicator 8 Managing Diversity ###
1 1. Respects all kinds and classes of people. ✘
2 2. Deals effectively with all races, nationalities, cultures, disabilities, ages and both sexes. ✘
3 3. Supports equal and fair treatment and opportunity for all. ✘ 4.4
4 4. Applies equal standards and criteria to all classes. ✘
5 5. Manifests cultural and gender sensitivity when dealing with people. ✘
###
Indicator 9 Accountability ###
1 1. Can be counted on to perform beyond set goals. ✘
2 2. Steadfastly pushes self and others towards results. ✘
3 3. Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources. ✘ 2.4

4 4. Builds team spirit. ✘
5 5. Transacts with transparency. ✘
###
Tick only one box provided for in each of the objective. Untick item is colored Gray. If correctly done, it will be colored Green and if more than one box were ticked, it will be colored Red. If all the ROWS are colored Green,
click the IPCRF Planning Phase Sheet and Print.
Results-Based Performance Management Systems
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM-TEACHER
Name: MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA Name of Rater: MYLEN C. GEROMO
School/Division MONTEVERDE ES/ CEBU PROVINCE
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
WEIGHT %AGE OF
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE
ACTUAL RESULTS ACCOMPLISHME RATING SCORE
PER KRA TARGET NT
Teaching-Learning Process A.1 Lesson plans utilized differentiated techniques and strategies in
teaching varied types of learners. 3.5 4 78.3 3 0.129
A.2 Lesson plans utilized differentiated activities for various types of

0 learners. 3.5 4 85.0 3 0.129
A.3 Lesson plans used various technology and instructional materials

0 appropriate for the subject matter. 3.5 4 78.3 3 0.129
B.1 Daily lesson/log/instructional plans prepared had the following:

Lesson Planning objectives(KSA), and procedure(3P's and 2A's) 30% 3.5 4 85.0 3 0.129
B.2 Learning units/competencies were arranged sequentially with

0 reasonable time allotment. 3.5 4 85.0 3 0.129
0 B.3 Learning objectives used were aligned with PELC/PSLC/CG 3.5 5 91.7 4 0.171
B.4 75% of the pupils/students observed classroom rules, guidelines,
0 individual and group tasks within the rating period as evidenced by 3.5 4 85.0 3 0.129
descriptive ratings in report cards/journals
Pupils/Students Outcomes C.1 Conducted Pre-test and Post-test in 75% of subject areas with analysis
of results 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
C.2 Class Records reflected developmental test results in all
subject areas per grading period with the following composition:
0 Knowledge -5 Process 3.5 4 85.0 3 0.090
-5 Understanding - 5
Performance -1
0 C.3 Report Cards were issued two weeks after the periodic test. 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
0 C.4 Pupils/students accomplishments were contained in his/her portfolio 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
Activities to Improve D.1 Conducted remediation/enrichment activity/program to 75% of the

Performance Indicators pupils/students that need it. 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
30%
0 D.2 Attained the required NAT MPS 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
0 D.3 Maintained a safe, clean and orderly classroom conducive to learning. 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
D.4 Participated in 75% of the school, district, and division curricular and
0 non-curricular activities. 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
E.1 Conducted home visits (with focus to PARDO's/SARDO's) per month

Guidance and Counseling with documentation. 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
E.2 Pupils/students observed classroom rules, guidelines individual and
0 group tasks within the rating period as evidenced by descriptive ratings in 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
report cards/journals
0 F.1 Organized functional Homeroom PTA 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250
0 F.2 Conducted periodic PTA meetings/conferences 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250

20%
F.3 Undertaken/ Initiated projects / events/ activities with external
0 funding/ sponsorship within the target date 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250
F.4 Participated/Attended in at least 75% of LGU initiated activities (e.g.

0 Rizal Day, Independence Day celebration, festivals) 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250
Professional Growth and

Development
H.1 Conducted at least one action research in a school year. 3.5 2 45.0 2 0.060
I.1 Produced publication/creative work for school paper/

0 division/regional/ national publication 3.5 1 25.0 1 0.030
I.2 Participated in trainings, seminars, conferences and LAC sessions

0 conducted on the level 15% 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
0 K.1 Punctuality 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150
0 K.2 Attendance 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150

a. Chaired technical committee School level b.
Conducted seminars in the school/district level c. Acted
Plus Factor as trainer/facilitator in the division/ regional/ national level 5% 3.5 1 25.0 1 0.050
d. Acquired resources assistance for the class/school from other
sources
OVERALL RATING 3.97
DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory
MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA

RATER RATEE
Results-Based Performance Management Systems
KRAs Part II. COMPETENCIES RATING SCORE
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

Self Management 1. Sets personal needs, goals, and directions toward personal development. 4
2. Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. 3
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 4 3.40
4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through ghantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 3
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 3
Professionalism and
Ethics
1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713). 4
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions on others. 5
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, punctual and regular in attendance, well-groomed and a good communicator. 3 3.20
4. Makes personal sacrifices(reporting to school on Saturdays and Holidays) to meet the organization’s needs. 2
5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness. 2
Result Focus 1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 4
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs. 5
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory
quality of work In terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 4 3.80
4. Expresses desire to do better and frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 2
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost,
more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal. 4
Teamwork 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. 3
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the organization. 4
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 5 4.00
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 4
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. 4
Service Orientation 1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems 5
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns. 4
3. Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment. 4 3.60
4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions. 3
5. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery. 2
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or
Innovation operational efficiency). 3
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 3
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co – workers to develop original ideas or solutions. 3 3.00
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and organization. 3
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities.Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. 3
CORE SKILLS
Achievement 1. Enjoys working hard. 5
2. Is action – oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as challenging. 5
3. Is not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning. 5 5.00
4. Seizes more opportunities than others. 5
5. Is a strategic thinker. 5
Managing Diversity 1. Respects all kinds and classes of people. 4
2. Deals effectively with all races, nationalities, cultures, disabilities, ages and both sexes. 4
3. Supports equal and fair treatment and opportunity for all. 5 4.40
4. Applies equal standards and criteria to all classes. 5
5. Manifests cultural and gender sensitivity when dealing with people. 4
Accountability 1. Can be counted on to perform beyond set goals. 1
2. Steadfastly pushes self and others towards results. 2
3. Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources. 3 2.40
4. Builds team spirit. 3
5. Transacts with transparency. 3
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING 3.64

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 3.50
CORE SKILLS 3.93
Conforme by Ratee
Teacher / Master Teacher MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA
Rated by and conferred with
Rater MYLEN C. GEROMO
Approved
Approving Authoruty MYLEN C. GEROMO
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region VII, Central Visayas
DIVISION OF CEBU PROVINCE

Part III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Final Performance Results Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 3.97
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior has agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Name of Employee Name of Superior
MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA MYLEN C. GEROMO
Signature Signature
Date Date
April 12, 2017 April 12, 2017
Part IV. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
Excellent in preparation of instructional materials and ICT- Have earned some units in Graduate School but you have to
based teaching materils finish masteral degree.
Require teacher to enroll in the Graduate School June 2016 Tuition Fees

Rater Ratee

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM
Rating Period: June 2016- March 2017
Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed
Very strong holding power among pupils Beware of too much familiarity with pupils. Observe proper decorum in dealing with pupils Year-round Manual on Code of Ethics
Employee Feedback: You have the potential of becoming an excellent teacher.
1. The RPMS is a tool in improving teachers' quality performances and productivity towards his commitment in teaching.
2. The competencies are designed to help improve perspective towards personal and professional growth, students' quality performances and community linkages.

Rater Ratee

Performance Monitoring and Coaching Report
Rating Period: September 2021- June 2022
Date CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE OF (RATEE/
RATER)
Sep-21 Participated in the LAC session on critical and creative thinking skills Modified in the Distribution and Retrieval of modules Strategies learned during LAC are applied in the classroom setting
November 2020 One learner has not submitted pertinent papers in school like the NSO •Certificate of enrolment/ registration form/class card Constant communication and reminder to home tutors and gave the
live birth, LCR or even baptismal record parents assistance on how to process the said document
December 2020 Teacher classroom set-up is not fit to Kinder learners. It really needs Classroom Structuring Gave TA to teacher to open FB page on Kindergarten classroom.
rearrangement, repainting and some put ups. Provide her some materials from stakeholders
Complete and Accurate Annual Property Inventory

January 2021 The teacher has not updated their records of LMs and equipment Inform the teacher to ask the template from the school custodian
Report
Gave TA to teacher on how edit her video lesson and encouraged

February 2021 The video lesson being uploaded was not edited. There was so much Technical Assistance Plan on video preparation and her to ask help from the school ICT regarding the screen recorder
noise. editing
she used.
Certificate of participation in a webinar, retooling,

Submitted her name to the district ITO inorder for her to be part of
March 2021 Teacher had the hard time to register herself in the virtual INSET upskilling, and other training/ seminar/ workshop with the training.
proof of implementation.
April 2021 Teacher lacks of LAC form 1,2 ,3 and 4 upon submission Completeness of all the LAC forms for the LAC reports Refreshed the teacher regarding the LAC forms as discussed in the
LDM training
May 2022 Teachers video lesson has no integration on DepEd core values The provision of technical assistance to teachers on Informed the teacher during the post conference on what to
teaching standards and pedagogies integrate in the lesson

The video lesson being uploaded was not edited. There was so much Technical Assistance Plan on video preparation and
June 2022 her to ask help from the school ICT regarding the screen recorder
noise. editing
she used.
MYLEN C. GEROMO ESTEFFANIE HISOLER

Rater Ratee

Rating Period: OCTOBER 2020- JULY 2021
RATER)
Any form of communication to parents/stakeholders Informed the teacher to contact the home tutors via chat, text or
October 2020 Teacher has a difficulty in the retrieval of some SLM. even informed the neighbor to returned the module on time for
(e.g., notice of meeting)
checking.
Remind the teacher ahead of time for her task. Gave her TA on how
November 2020 The teacher forgot to submit all the needed outputs in her LAC reports LAC Session Plan based on the teachers needs to prepare ppt presentation and at the same time the LAC forms
obtained from the validated feedback. 1,2,3 and 4.
structuring of the classroom was a team effort. It gives the learners a

sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
December 2020 Teacher's bulletin board is outdated Classroom instructuring
the teacher that the display must be updated even in time of
pandemic

Report
February 2021 Teacher forgot to observed health safety protocol to her home tutors Safety is always our priority Remind the teacher to observed and to maintain the safety
during the retrieval of SLM protocol.
March 2021 Teacher had the hard time aswering some evaluation link in every topic Any proof of participation in a benchmarking activity. Mentored teacher on how to boost her internet connection and
of the training gave her some ICT shortcuts
Informed teachers to craft a DLP with the indicators being

April 2021 During the pre-observation, teacher's DLP for CO has no integration on Curriculum- teaching and learning process highlighted and at the same time an evidence of DRRM and Core
DRRM and Core Values
Values Integration
Asked the teacher for the delay of submission. Let her cite some
May 2021 Teacher failed to submit her video lesson for the 3rd quarter Classroom The provision of technical assistance to teachers on valid reasons. Gave her a dealine to cope for the timeliness of the
Observation teaching standards and pedagogies
report.

noise. editing
she used.
5 out of 16 learners has returned the modules with no answer and no Any form of communication to parents/stakeholders Conduct home visits to home tutors and asked who can assist the
performance task (e.g., notice of meeting) learner on his/her studies
MYLEN C. GEROMO MARIA LUZ D. CHAN

Rater Ratee

Rating Period: OCTOBER 2020- JULY 2021
RATER)
2 out of 11 learners didn’t claimed the modules in school as agreed Any form of communication to parents/stakeholders Contact the home tutors via chat, text or even informed the
October 2020
during our Orientation during the schedule date of distribution (e.g., notice of meeting) neighbor to claim the modules in school
Remind the teacher ahead of time for her task. Gave her TA on how
November 2020 The teacher forgot to submit all the needed outputs in her LAC reports LAC Session Plan based on the teachers needs to prepare ppt presentation and at the same time the LAC forms
obtained from the validated feedback. 1,2,3 and 4.

sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
December 2020 Teacher's bulletin board is outdated Classroom instructuring
the teacher that the display must be updated even in time of
pandemic

Report
February 2021 Teacher forgot to observed health safety protocol to her home tutors Safety is always our priority Remind the teacher to observed and to maintain the safety
during the retrieval of SLM protocol.
March 2021 Teacher had the hard time aswering some evaluation link in every topic Any proof of participation in a benchmarking activity. Mentored teacher on how to boost her internet connection and
of the training gave her some ICT shortcuts
April 2021 3 out of 11 learners cannot identify blended words Curriculum- teaching and learning process Informed teachers to conduct intervention to the learners. As a
School head, I will monitor the progress of the said learners.
Informed teachers to craft a DLP with the indicators being

May 2021 During the pre-observation, teacher's DLP for CO has no highlights for The provision of technical assistance to teachers on highlighted and at the same time an evidence of DRRM and Core
indicators 1, 2 and 3. teaching standards and pedagogies
Values Integration

noise. editing
she used.
MYLEN C. GEROMO REMEDIOS R. BOMEDIANO

Rater Ratee

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM
Rating Period: October 2020- july 2021
RATER)
Inform the parents/guardian regarding the learners situations.

Second day from the opening, the teacher was not able to finish her 5 Suggest the teacher to make
October 2020 Classroom Management
subjects because in the afternoon class, one learner was always crying/ her class lively an create some tricks for the learners to attract and
learn to love in school.
Remind the teacher for her time management in every activity. Use
November 2020 The teacher failed to follow time for group activities. Classroom Management
a bell or a hand signal when the group were done .
There was less participation during story reading and making comments Encouraged the teacher to have a group activity for the learners
December 2020 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
and asking questions. 100% participation.

Teacher was updating the bulletin board in the classroom. Lesson per
January 2021 Classroom conducive to learning sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
unit was posted. News clips related to the learning areas were posted.
the teacher that the display must be in eye level.
The teacher has a mismatch of her assessment from the objectives of the remind the teacher that the objective of the lesson must be align to
February 2021 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment
lesson. the assessment.
March 2021
April 2021
May 2021
June 2021
MYLEN C. GEROMO MELANIE E. PUYOD

Rater Ratee

RATER)
Inform the parents/guardian regarding the learners situations.

Opening of classes, the teacher was not able to follow her blocks of time,
Follow the time frame as reflected in her blocks of time Suggest the teacher to make
October 2020 since she was bothered by the two learners who were still crying inside
for Kindergarten. her class lively an create some tricks for the learners to attract and
her classroom.
learn to love in school.

November 2020 Classroom conducive to learning sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
Suggest to teacher to have an independent activity by the learners in

December 2020 Teacher did not adpot the independent activities for Kinder Curriculum- teaching and learning process
order to have a life long learnings.
January 2021 The teacher failed to follow time for group activities. Classroom Management Remind the teacher for her time management in every activity. Use
February 2021 The teacher failed to prepare DI activities that misleads the concept of Differentiated Instructions remind the teacher to prepare a DI activities intended to each group
the lesson. of learners. Some learners got bored and tired.
March 2021
April 2021
May 2021
June 2021
MYLEN C. GEROMO TRESA C. GIO

Rater Ratee

RATER)

January 2019 Teacher was updating the bulletin board in the classroom. Lesson per Classroom conducive to learning sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
The teacherhas a mismatch of her assessment from the objectives of the remind the teacher that the objective of the lesson must be align to
Febraury 2019 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment
March 2019 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
MYLEN C. GEROMO ANALOU F. BELONGILOT

Rater Ratee

RATER)
October 2020 The teacher failed to follow time for group activities. Classroom Management Remind the teacher for her time management in every activity. Use
November 2020 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
December 2020 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment

February 2021 There was less participation during story reading and making comments Curriculum- teaching and learning process Encouraged the teacher to have a group activity for the learners
March 2021
April 2021
May 2021
June 2021
MYLEN C. GEROMO SUE ANNE E. GONZA
Rater Ratee

RATER)
September 2019 There was less participation during story reading and making comments Curriculum- teaching and learning process Encouraged the teacher to have a group activity for the learners
October 2019 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
November , 2019 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment

February 2020 The teacher failed to follow time for group activities. Classroom Management Remind the teacher for her time management in every activity. Use
MYLEN C. GEROMO ESTEFFANIE HISOLER

Rater Ratee

Rating Period: October 2020- July 2021
RATER)
October 2020 Teacher failed to conduct the spelling in her English class. Curriculum- teaching spelling Suggest the teacher to follow the Horn method in teaching spelling.
December 2020 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
January 2021 The teacherhas a mismatch of her assessment from the objectives of the Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment remind the teacher that the objective of the lesson must be align to

February 2021 Classroom conducive to learning sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind
March 2021 Curriculum- teaching and learning process
Encouraged the teacher to use statement or paragraph to let the

April 2021 Teacher spoon feed the lesson on Glosaary Curriculum-Teaching strategy and technique
learners locate the words in the glossary
May 2021
June 2021
MYLEN C. GEROMO PEDRITO L. PUYOD

Rater Ratee

Rating Period: October 2020- October 2021
RATER)
The teacher failed to have a "Balitaan" or News Reporting in her Encouraged the teacher to have have a news reporting in her AP
October 2020 Curriculum- teaching strategy and technique
prelimenary Activities class before the start of her lesson.
December 2020 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment

Encouraged the teacher to use rubrics in assessing the group

February 2021 Teacher has no rubrics in her group activity in MAPEH Curriculum- teaching and learning process
presentation.
Work task and schedules to achieve goals as eevident in her DRRM Motivate teacher the importance of the timeliness in submission of
March 2021 DRRM reports submitted but not on time
checklist have to prioritized reports
April 2021
Served as model to her colleagues, she can share her IT techniques

May 2021 Teacher's video lesson was very impresive Curriculum- teaching strategy and technique
on LAC session
DLP for CO was submitted on time with DRRM, Core Values Integration.
June 2021 Easy to track teachers indicators during CO Could be very easy for the teacher to deliver the flow of the lesson
But the Indicators must be highlighted
MYLEN C. GEROMO ADELITA B. FERRATER

Rater Ratee

RATER)
Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning &

September 2021 The teacher failed to distribute the supplementary reading materials Remind the teacher to plan activities for the school reporting
Assessment and Reporting

October 2021 Classroom conducive to learning sense of belongingness for the nice room they are using. Remind

May 2022 There was less participation during story reading and making comments Curriculum- teaching and learning process Encouraged the teacher to have a group activity for the learners
The Teacher's objectives of the lesson was achieved but failed to end up Suggested that the teacher must be time concious and she must
June 2022 Follow what is reflected in the DLP
the lesson on time follow the time reflected in every activity more or less.
MYLEN C. GEROMO ARRIANNE LOU P. CARREON

Rater Ratee

RATER)
Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning &

September 2021 The teacher failed to distribute the supplementary reading materials Remind the teacher to plan activities for the school reporting
Assessment and Reporting
September 2019 The teacher failed to follow time for group activities. Classroom Management
November , 2019 Alignment of the objectives to the Assessment

May 2022 There was less participation during story reading and making comments Curriculum- teaching and learning process Encouraged the teacher to have a group activity for the learners
The Teacher's objectives of the lesson was achieved but failed to end up Suggested that the teacher must be time concious and she must
June 2022 Follow what is reflected in the DLP
the lesson on time follow the time reflected in every activity more or less.
MYLEN C. GEROMO ARRIANNE LOU P. CARREON

Rater Ratee

Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form - PMCF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form - PMCF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS)

 Promote individual and team growth, participation and commitment.

 Grow professionally and personally.

PART III Summary of Ratings for Discussion

Scale Adjectival Description

Very Satisfactory (4)

Unsatisfactory – performance of 51% to 99% of the planned targets; and

5. Accomplished PART III and Part IV

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING PHASE

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of

97.50% and above of 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of 0 to 37.49 % of

C.2 Class Records reflected

Remediation Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/

Participated in 97.50% Participated in 86.25% Participated in 75% to Participated in 51% to Participated in 0 to

E.2 Pupils/students observed

F.4 Participated/Attended in at least

Attended at least 32 Attended at least 24 Attended at least 16

a. Chaired technical committee

MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA MYLEN C. GEROMO

DepEd RPMS Form- Teacher

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS

97.50% and above of the 75% to 86.24% of the

97.50% and above of the 86.25% to 97.49% of 75% to 86.24% of

Remediation Remediation/ Remediation/

E.2 Pupils/students observed

Conducted at least 10 Conducted at least 8 Conducted at least 6 Conducted less than 4

a. Chaired technical committee

OVERALL RATING 3.97

DepEd RPMS Form- Teacher

3 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. ✘

Indicator 5 Service Orientation ###

3 3. Is not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning. ✘ 5.0

5 5. Manifests cultural and gender sensitivity when dealing with people. ✘

2 2. Steadfastly pushes self and others towards results. ✘

3 3. Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources. ✘ 2.4

5 5. Transacts with transparency. ✘

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

A.2 Lesson plans utilized differentiated activities for various types of

A.3 Lesson plans used various technology and instructional materials

B.1 Daily lesson/log/instructional plans prepared had the following:

B.2 Learning units/competencies were arranged sequentially with

Activities to Improve D.1 Conducted remediation/enrichment activity/program to 75% of the

E.1 Conducted home visits (with focus to PARDO's/SARDO's) per month

0 F.1 Organized functional Homeroom PTA 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250

0 F.2 Conducted periodic PTA meetings/conferences 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.250

F.4 Participated/Attended in at least 75% of LGU initiated activities (e.g.

Professional Growth and

I.1 Produced publication/creative work for school paper/

I.2 Participated in trainings, seminars, conferences and LAC sessions

0 K.1 Punctuality 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150

0 K.2 Attendance 3.5 5 105.0 5 0.150

MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA

KRAs Part II. COMPETENCIES RATING SCORE

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING 3.64

Region VII, Central Visayas

DIVISION OF CEBU PROVINCE

Name of Employee Name of Superior

MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA MYLEN C. GEROMO

Part IV. DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

MYLEN C. GEROMO MA. LOURDES E. BALBUENA