You are on page 1of 2

-1-

MCA No. 323/16


Satbinder Singh Bhatia Vs. Sandeep Singh Bhatia
20.09.2019

Present: Sh. Sonal Anand, Ld. Counsel for appellants.

Respondent in person.

Heard.

It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the appellants that the

appellants do not intend to block the said iron grill. The only difficulty of the

appellants is that if they want to get the wall supporting the iron grill painted /

renovated the respondent reports the matter to the local police station and uses

the impugned injunction order to harass the appellants.

The respondent has denied these allegations.

If so advised the appellants can file appropriate application before

the Ld. Trial Court for seeking permission to carry out necessary repairs /

renovations / painting job etc.

The respondent submits that he may be also allowed to move

similar application before the Ld. Trial Court.

The parties are free to move appropriate applications before the Ld.

Trial Court for seeking permission to carry out necessary repairs / renovations /

painting job etc.


-2-

MCA No. 323/16


Satbinder Singh Bhatia Vs. Sandeep Singh Bhatia

In view of the above, Ld. Counsel for the appellants seeks

permission to withdraw the present appeal.

Separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the appellants recorded.

In view of the separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the appellants,

the present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Appeal file be consigned to record room after due compliance.

TCR be sent back to Ld. Trial Court.

Parties are directed to appear before Ld. Trial Court for the date

fixed i.e 17.10.2019.

(Rajinder Singh)
SCJ/RC/ (West)/Delhi
20.09.2019
M

You might also like