Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T.J. Siang, A.A. Jalil, S.Y. Liew, A.H.K. Owgi & A.F.A. Rahman
To cite this article: T.J. Siang, A.A. Jalil, S.Y. Liew, A.H.K. Owgi & A.F.A. Rahman (2022): A
review on state-of-the-art catalysts for methane partial oxidation to syngas production, Catalysis
Reviews, DOI: 10.1080/01614940.2022.2072450
1. Introduction
The depletion of fossil fuel and anthropogenic CO2 emission has grown
exponentially due to the large-scale industrial combustion driven by the
increasing global energy demand and economic expansion in recent years.
Figure 1 illustrates the contribution of sectors to global CO2 gas emission.[1]
Notably, the energy sector was the main contributor with 73.2%, whereby the
energy use in industry (24.2%) was the leading factor, followed by energy use
in buildings (17.5%) and transport (16.2%). The fossil fuel-based combustion
(i.e., coal, natural gas and petroleum) reportedly resulted in 33.5 gigatons of
global energy-related CO2 emission in 2019 due to intensive population
growth and it predictably grows by an additional 19.2% in 2050.[2,3] Thus,
CONTACT A.A. Jalil aishahaj@utm.my School of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of
Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
© 2022 Taylor & Francis
2 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[1]
Figure 1. Global co2 gas emission by various sectors. Reproduced with permission from Ref.
Copyright 2020, ourworldindata.org.
Figure 3. (A) Equilibrium composition and (b) equilibrium reactant conversions and H2/CO molar
ratio for methane partial oxidation at various temperatures and atmospheric pressure calculated
by HSC chemistry 6. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [46] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
of whether it is the only reaction to catalyze has been a keynote in the MPO
investigations since the remaining observed reactions in Table 1 typically play
crucial roles in the MPO to affect the overall thermodynamic equilibrium in
the system. As demonstrated in Figure 3a, the absence of O2 with substantial
equilibrium amount of both H2O and CO2 suggested the dominance of CH4
combustion (R4, also known as CH4 total oxidation) at low-temperature
regions which was responsible for the O2 equilibrium conversion of 100%
(Figure 3b). At increasing temperature, the subsequent oxidizing agents were
further consumed to produce syngas via MSR (R1) and MDR (R2), known as
indirect combustion-reforming route.[46,52–56] This postulation is further cor
roborated by the calculated Gibbs free energy change profiles of MSR and
MDR in Figure 4a, where the Gibbs free energy changes shifted from positive
into negative value at temperature above 600°C. As a result, it could be
concluded that the catalytic MPO is constituted by co-occurrence of direct
and indirect routes depending on the inherent nature of catalyst system during
reaction.
D and ND represent dominant and not dominant, respectively, while ND‒
D (or D‒ND) represents from not dominant to dominant (or vice versa).
From our previous thermodynamic study,[46] the CO dehydrogenation
(R11), Boudouard reaction (R12), CO2 hydrogenation (R13) and CH4 decom
position (R14) were identified as main factors for carbon formation during
8
Table 1. Summary of propensity of primary and side reactions occur during reaction based on gibbs free energy change calculations performed by HSC chemistry 6.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [46] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Temperature regions
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4
Reactions Equations No. ΔG (kJ mol−1) (200‒400°C) (400‒600°C) (600‒800°C) (800‒1000°C)
Reforming reactions
Methane steam reforming (MSR) CH4 þ H2 O ! 3H2 þ CO R1 −0.2446 T + 150.85 ND ND‒D D D
Methane dry reforming (MDR) CH4 þ CO2 ! 2H2 þ 2CO R2 −0.2797 T + 179.38 ND ND‒D D D
Methane partial oxidation (MPO) CH4 þ 0:5O2 ! 2H2 þ CO R3 −0.1921 T – 79.924 ND ND‒D D D
Non-coke forming reactions
CH4 combustion CH4 þ 2O2 ! CO2 þ 2H2 O R4 0.0005 T – 800.78 D D D D
CO2 methanation 4H2 þ CO2 ! CH4 þ 2H2 O R5 0.2096 T – 122.32 D D‒ND ND ND
CO methanation 3H2 þ CO ! CH4 þ H2 O R6 0.2446 T – 150.85 D D‒ND ND ND
Water-gas shift (WGS) H2 O þ CO ! CO2 þ H2 R7 0.0351 T – 28.534 D D‒ND ND ND
Revere water-gas shift (RWGS) CO2 þ H2 ! H2 O þ CO R8 −0.0351 T + 28.534 ND ND ND-D D
Carbon gasification by CO2 CðsÞ þ CO2 ! 2CO R9 −0.177 T + 124.14 ND ND ND-D D
Carbon gasification by H2O CðsÞ þ H2 O ! H2 þ CO R10 −0.1419 T + 95.604 ND ND ND-D D
Coke forming reactions
CO dehydrogenation H2 þ CO ! H2 O þ CðsÞ R11 0.1419 T – 95.604 D D‒ND ND ND
Boudouard reaction 2CO ! CðsÞ þ CO2 R12 0.177 T – 124.14 D D D‒ND ND
CO2 hydrogenation 2H2 þ CO2 ! CðsÞ þ 2H2 O R13 0.1069 T – 67.069 D D‒ND ND ND
CH4 decomposition CH4 ! CðsÞ þ 2H2 R14 −0.1027 T + 55.246 ND ND‒D D D
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 9
Figure 4. Gibbs free energy of (a) reforming reactions, (b) non-coke forming reactions and (c) coke
forming reactions as a function of temperature at pressure of 1 bar. Reproduced with permission
from Ref. [46] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic drawing of the reactor; (b) the axial temperature and species composition
profiles in the reactor during the MPO reaction at 900°C and GHSV of 37,000 mL g−1 h−1).
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58] Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Figure 6. Pictorial illustration of direct and indirect routes for CH4 partial oxidation process.
adsorption and activation of both CH4 and O2 occur at metal surface and
support surface, respectively. Even though the energy required for dissociation
of CH4 molecules is closely related to the catalyst surface properties, it is
widely accepted that the CH4 dissociation is always the rate determining step
to initiate MPO reaction. The dissociated CHx species preferably adsorbs on
a site completing tetravalency, with adsorbed CH3 locates on top of metal
atoms and CH2 binding between two adjacent metal atoms forming a bridged
adsorption, which leads to the formation of adsorbed hydrogen and adsorbed
carbon species. The adsorbed hydrogen species react with adjacent one to
produce H2 gas and subsequently leaves the catalyst surface. Meanwhile, the
O2 molecules dissociatively adsorb on the support surface with O-only coor
dination to form adsorbed surface oxygen species, which is normally a fast
process. With the participation of adsorbed surface oxygen species, adsorbed
carbon species at metal surface can be converted into CO gas. Apart from
aforementioned direct CH4 decomposition, adsorbed CH4 molecules (at metal
surface) can be dissociated by reacting with adsorbed surface oxygen species
(at support surface) to form adsorbed CHx and OH species. Besides the main
12 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
syngas product, some byproducts such as H2O and CO2 are possibly formed
during direct MPO route, in which adsorbed hydrogen species react with
adsorbed OH groups to yield H2O gas whereas the CO gas is adsorbed on
support surface and combine with adsorbed surface oxygen species to generate
CO2 gas.
In the case of indirect MPO mechanism route, as CH4 and O2 gases
continuously move through the catalyst bed, it is commonly believed that
CH4 combustion is dominating the front section, followed by CH4 reforming
processes (i.e., MSR and MDR) in the remaining section of catalyst bed.
Similarly, the CH4 molecules are dissociatively adsorbed on the metal surface
to form CHx intermediates whereas the adsorbed surface oxygen species are
originated from O2 molecules adsorbed and activated at support surface.
Subsequently, adsorbed surface oxygen has possibility to react with adsorbed
CHx species and thus formation of adsorbed CHxO intermediate. Some
authors suggest the adsorbed CHxO intermediate to be the precursor to CO2
and H2O formation under the exceedingly oxidative environment.[78,87] Other
authors suggested that concentration of adsorbed surface oxygen on catalyst
surface is the key factor for direct route of MPO to produce H2 and CO, thus
preventing the tendency of total oxidation.[78,80,86] In a series of classical
computational and experimental investigations about the short-contact-time
MPO process,[60,88] Schmidt and the coworkers verified the existence of short
oxidation zone at the catalyst entrance, followed by reforming zone in the
remaining catalyst bed even at high space velocity. They also found that the
syngas selectivity was drastically reduced at high space velocity. This could
indicate that concentration of adsorbed surface oxygen on catalyst surface is
independent from space velocity.
In the following section of catalyst bed (CH4 reforming zone), the subse
quent H2O produced from CH4 combustion further adsorb and dissociate on
the support surface and as a result, the formation of hydroxyl groups. Notably,
the adsorption and dissociation of CO2 can be categorized into three different
ways reliant on the surface structure and defects of support, namely, (i) O-only
coordination, of which both O atoms bind with surface (ii) C-only coordina
tion and (iii) O and C coordination where both O and C atoms bond with
catalyst surface whilst another O atom expose to gas phase. In general, these
dissociation steps of both H2O and CO2 are considerably rapid. Similarly, the
CH4 adsorb and dissociate into adsorbed CHx species on metal surface in the
reforming zone. With the participation of adsorbed surface oxygen or hydro
xyl groups, the adsorbed CHx species can be transformed into adsorbed CHx
O species or adsorbed CO. In fact, some authors reached an agreement that the
adsorbed CHxO species is the main contributory factor to the H2 and CO
formation whereas other authors argued that the CO formation is a result of
reduction between carbonates from adsorbed CO2 and carbon deposit on
metal surface. In addition, other research groups claimed that CO is directly
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 13
Figure 7. Two time-lapsed series of TEM images of (a) 0 min, (b) 50 min, (c) 68 min, (d) 0 min, (e)
61 min and (f) 76 min of Pt nanoparticles as a function of reaction time. white arrows indicate the
location of step formation as carbon layers encapsulate the nanoparticle. Reproduced with
permission from Ref.[90] Copyright 2016, Elsevier.
14 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Figure 8. Results of systematic linear combination analysis in comparison to the ms signal for
observed oscillations at the beginning and the end of the catalytic fixed bed (upper part, x/l = 0;
lower part, x/l = 1). Reproduced with permission from ref.[101] Copyright 2011, American Chemical
Society.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the specific strategics for MPO catalyst design.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 17
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of CH4 interaction with pristine CeO2 surface and Ni-CeO2 surface
having surface defects with undercoordinated o atoms. Reproduced with permission from Ref.
[108]
Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
between metal particles (i.e., Au and Pd) and TiO2, enabling the Au particles to
improve the adsorption and scission of O2 whilst Pd particles facilitated the
CH4 dissociation and as a result, Au-Pd catalyzed MPO could be occurred at
low temperature. However, an opposite behavior was observed by Emamdoust
et al.[113] in their work of MPO over SiO2 supported Ni and NiCe catalysts.
From the results of temperature programmed surface reaction for CH4 (CH4-
TPSR) and O2 (O2-TPSR), they found that the temperature for CH4 and O2
activation increased by 100°C and 50°C, respectively, in the presence of ceria.
This behavior was attributed to the rapid reoxidation of metallic Ni0 to NiO
form of NiCe/SiO2 catalyst at low temperature due to its excellent redox
properties, which led to the requirement of higher temperature to retain the
metallic Ni0 phase during MPO reaction. Based on the findings of Li et al.,[106]
addition of Re to a Ru/Al2O3 catalyst not only strengthened the metal-support
interaction to preserve the metallic Ru0 phase during reaction but also surpris
ingly altered the reaction mechanism. In situ diffuse reflectance infrared
Fourier transform (DRIFT) studies revealed that the primary role of Ru was
to reduce the Re element to a lower-valent ReOx species and the subsequent
reduced Re species preferentially produced the syngas through direct MPO
route by forming formate intermediate in short contact time.
Apart from modification of support structure and addition of secondary
metal, tailoring the nanoparticles size and shape of hosting metal is of crucial
to the MPO performance as it not only affect the extent of metal-support
interaction, most importantly it leads to different reaction mechanism
depending on metal oxidation states associated with nanoparticles size [114–
116,]. In the study about size effect of Rh nanoparticles on syngas selectivity in
MPO activity, Kondratenko et al.[114] reported that the MPO activity
decreased by 20% with a rise in Rh nanoparticle size from 1.1 to 5.5 nm.
They attributed this behavior to the kinetic interactions of CH4, O2 and CO2
with Rh catalysts associated with particle size. Based on the microkinetic
evaluation of transient experiments, increased size of Rh nanoparticle led to
a drop in rate constants for all reactants and hence, affecting both primary
(CH4 total oxidation) and secondary (CH4 reforming) routes in MPO system.
The enhanced metal-support interaction reportedly not only facilitates the
activation of reactants but also effectively hinder the formation of carbonac
eous species on catalyst surface. In the study of Rh supported hydroxyapatite
catalysts in MPO evaluation, the RhOx in small particles possessed a great
carbon resistance owing to strong metal-support interactions (where the
detected carbon amount was lesser than 1 wt%), which governed the long-
term MPO test in terms of CH4 conversion of 86% for 30 h.[117]
A further insight into the elementary reaction steps in association with
metal nanoparticle size has been recently revealed by computational works.
Based on the DFT calculation, Guo et al.[78] found that the size of Rh particle
has considerable influence on the oxidation state and thus leading to two
20 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Figure 11. The calculated pathways for MPO (δE/EA) on the small-sized RH catalyst model. red
colored path represents the optimum reaction route. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[78]
Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 21
Figure 12. Correlation between basicity strength of MgO/NiAl2O4 catalysts and mpo activity in
terms of CO/CO2 ratio and H2 yield. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[118] Copyright 2016,
Elsevier.
strong basic sites density. They assigned this observation to the increased
quantity of chemisorbed O2- species at extremely strong basic sites density
and as a result, deterioration on MPO activity. Similarly, Ding et al.[124]
reported the advantages of basicity by introduction of Yb dopant to Ni/Al2
O3 catalyst for MPO activity. The addition of Yb not only enhanced the
dispersibility of Ni particles but also facilitated the CO2 adsorption on catalyst
surface, thus improving the carbon balance and hindering the carbon deposi
tion. As a result, the Ni-Yb/Al2O3 catalyst reportedly exhibited CH4 conver
sion of 98% and H2 selectivity of 83%, respectively, for a 170 h-on-stream
MPO reaction.
cycles.[125] This can be attributed to the high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) of
reducible materials improves the mobility of oxygen atoms from crystal lattice
to surface, which facilitates the corresponding cyclic process.[14] In MPO, the
existence of oxygen vacancies acts as active sites for dissociation of oxidants,
hence enhancing the pool of labile oxygen ions for surface reaction on
catalyst.[38] Additionally, it has been established that the tuning of metal
state for catalytic activity can be achieved by shifting the Fermi level with
appropriate combination of reducible oxide support and metal
atoms.[30,126,127] As a result, the formation energy of oxygen vacancies could
be altered and subsequently affect the reactivity of the oxygen atoms from the
surface lattice of a reducible oxide, which significantly influenced the reaction
kinetic regimes for C‒H bond activation in CH4 molecules.[56,72,128]
Amongst the reducible oxide supports, CeO2 is widely recognized as the
most suitable representative for evaluating effect of oxygen vacancies on
a catalysis activity owing to its high OSC and great diffusivity of releasing
and restoring oxygen.[14,127] On this basis, several studies about CeO2 support
modification including CeO2 mixed oxides,[129–131] CeO2 with different topo
logical structure [132,133] and the corresponding in situ evaluations [134,135] have
been developed. Toscani et al.[134] conducted an in situ dispersive X-ray
absorption spectroscopy (DXAS) study for MPO over CuO–NiO/CeO2
–ZrO2 catalyst in order to determine the relationship between the active Ni
and redox behavior of CeO2–ZrO2. They reported that such a redox behavior
of Ce associated with formation of oxygen vacancies could create a H2 spil
lover effect on catalyst surface leading to a lower reduction temperature for
catalyst activation, retaining the preservation of metallic Ni0 phase for long-
term MPO reaction. A similar behavior was also observed in their recent
in situ DXAS evaluations of MPO over NiO/CeO2-Sm2O3
nanocomposites,[135] which further highlights the significance of tuning oxy
gen vacancy concentration in CeO2-supported Ni catalysts to optimize the
catalytic activity. A detailed mechanism of a catalyst support with high con
centration of oxygen vacancies toward preservation of metallic phase and
promotion of reforming activity has been recently proposed by Yentekakis
et al.[136] for Rh/alumina-ceria-zirconia. As shown in Figure 13a, the adsorbed
oxygen atoms on oxygen vacancies could produce an effective double layer
(Oδ-, δ+) via O2- back-spillover effect on the Rh particles, leading to changes in
chemisorptive properties and Rh work function. Notably, Oδ- layer not only
enhanced the Rh work function to strengthen the chemisorptive bond of
electron donor (CHx species) but also weakening that of electron acceptor
(atomic O from oxidants). As a result, the Rh‒O bonds in RhOx state were
weakened and destabilized, thus readily transforming into metallic Rh0 form
during reaction. Similar findings in the presence of oxygen vacancy-rich
support are also suggested by works of Das et al.[133] and Al-Fatesh et al.[137]
24 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Figure 13. (a) Model of the bifunctional support-mediated promotion by supports with high
oxygen ion lability. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[136] Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (b)
Proposed reaction processes of chemical looping mpo over Ni-doped WO3 oxygen carriers.
Reproduced with permission from Ref.[86] Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Apart from the “effective double layer model” to preserve the metallic phase
for a catalyst system, the stored oxygen atoms on oxygen vacancies reportedly
contribute to the carbon removal via gasification and hence suppression on the
carbonaceous deposition on catalyst surface. Although the redox characteristic
of reducible oxygen carriers is of interest for MPO, recent studies revealed that
the regeneration of reduced oxygen carriers by oxidants favored the CO2
formation at the expense of CO selectivity.[86,138] In this context, exploration
of oxygen carriers to provide optimum lattice oxygen to selectively produce
syngas in chemical looping MPO is essential.[74,79] Chen et al.[86] designed
WO3-based oxygen carriers as the primary source of lattice oxygen and further
enhanced the CH4 conversion ability and availability of lattice oxygen by
introducing NiO nanoclusters. The characterization results revealed that the
embedment of Ni cations into the WO3 lattice structure largely reduced the
tungsten‒oxygen bond strength, thus increased the lattice oxygen availability.
As seen in Figure 13b, NiOx species efficiently dissociated CH4 molecules to
form CHx species and subsequently reacted with O2- species from WO3-based
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 25
oxygen carriers to produce syngas and oxygen vacancies during CH4 reduction
stage. In O2 oxidation stage, the metallic Ni0 phase was oxidized to NiOx
species and active lattice oxygens were restored on oxygen vacancies in WO3-
based oxygen carriers for the next redox cycle. The drastic change in reactivity
of oxygen carriers to chemical looping MPO with an addition of a low quantity
of metal dopant on Fe2O3 oxygen carriers is also reported by Qin et al.[139]
With the Cu dopant, they found that the CH4 conversion was 4‒5 fold high
than its counterparts under same reaction conditions due to the facilitation of
oxygen vacancies formation in Fe2O3 oxygen carriers lowering barrier of CH4
activation energy. Shen et al.[140] investigated the effect of regeneration dura
tion on the syngas selectivity over BaFe3Al9O19 hexaaluminate (BF3A) as the
oxygen carries in chemical looping MPO. They found that the syngas selec
tivity was highly reliant on the variation in oxidation state of Fe in association
with different regeneration periods where the concentration of oxygen vacan
cies was determined by the oxidation state of Fe. A decrease in regeneration
duration (from 15 min to 4.2 min) resulted in a high tendency of Fe2+ and Fe0
formation, creating more oxygen vacancies for MPO and MDR to produce
syngas.
4.4. Perovskite
Given the merits of oxygen vacancy toward oxidation reactions, perovskite
oxides (ABO3 where A = rare-earth element; B = 3d transition metals),
mixtures of semiconducting and oxygen carrier materials, have been exten
sively studied in reforming reactions, in particular to chemical looping
approach.[141,142] In fact, the concentration of oxygen vacancy in perovskite
structure is highly related to the total charge of A and B cations.[142] The
reduction degree of transient metal cations and high oxygen storage capa
city are the two attractive features of perovskites make it applicable in
chemical looping MPO as both catalyst and oxygen carrier.[71,72,143]
Interestingly, the partial or total combustion reportedly depends on the
nature of the oxide ion involved and type of oxygen interaction with the
perovskite surface. Thus, the knowledge of surface oxygen binding energies
and the corresponding kinetics is of significance to catalysis. In this context,
Mihai et al.[144] have conducted a kinetic study for CH4 total combustion,
partial oxidation and CH4 decomposition on LaFeO3 perovskite with the
manipulation of the O content and crystal size during the chemical looping
MPO process. They found that the syngas selectivity was highly reliant on
the quantity of O available and withdrew from the LaFeO3 perovskite
structure and its crystal size. Kinetic determining step in the CH4 conver
sion was ascertained as the surface reaction step related to Fe–O bond that
substantially depending on Fe–O bond strength, which determined the
LaFeO3 crystal size. The larger LaFeO3 crystal size reportedly possessed
26 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the total combustion, partial oxidation and methane decom
position on different active sites of LaFeO3 perovskite. (o)s ‒ surface oxygen species, □ – oxygen
vacancy site, l – number of total active sites on the surface. Reproduced with permission from
Ref.[144] Copyright 2012, Elsevier.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 27
Figure 15. (a) Proposed reaction mechanism of CH4 partial oxidation coupled with CO2 splitting over
LaFexCo1-xO3 for syngas production. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[71] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
(b) Scheme of possible paths for lattice oxygen mobility in La1-xCexFeO3 (x = 0, 0.5, 1) redox catalysts. (a)
Calculated (dft+u) oxygen vacancy formation energy (δef,vac). (b) Calculated (dft+u) oxygen migration
energy (em). (c) The bulk diffusion coefficient (dchem) of oxygen in redox catalysts at 850°C determined by
analyzing the conductivity relaxation kinetics after an abrupt change in the atmosphere from 1 vol.%
CH4/CO2 to 10 vol.% CH4/CO2 in electrical conductivity relaxation measurement. (d) The arrhenius plots
of the dchem over a temperature of 650‒850°C measured by switching between two CO/CO2 gas streams
with different po2 in electrical conductivity relaxation measurement. (e) Correlation between syngas
yield and degree of FeO6 octahedral distortion. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[72] Copyright
2020, American Chemical Society.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 29
Since the MPO is a fast exothermic reaction, which readily generates hot
spot in catalyst bed and as a result, catalyst deactivation due to collapse
of catalyst structure and agglomeration of active metal is always an
unavoidable setback. In this context, modification of catalyst morphol
ogy has emerged as an effective approach to facilitate the external and
internal gas diffusion of reactants and products in the catalyst bed in
order to minimize the effect of hot spot formation for achieving high
syngas yield.[67,149] Li et al.[150] investigated the effect of mesoporous
material for the MPO performance by preparing Co-Ni-MCM-41 cata
lysts. The Co-Ni-MCM-41 exhibited 88% CH4 conversion and 87% H2
selectivity, accredited to the excellent anchoring effect of mesoporous
structure reducing the metal sinterization. In addition, the mesoporous
channels in MCM-41 hindered the nucleation of carbonaceous species to
prevent the catalyst deactivation through encapsulation. In the study of
chemical looping MPO, Liu et al.[151] also reported the advantages of
mesoporous Fe2O3@SBA-15 nanostructure in the catalysis activity by
attaining a near 100% CO selectivity at temperature as low as 750°C.
They attributed this superior CO selectivity to the mesoporous nanos
tructure of SBA-15 facilitated the reaction rate on surface site, of which
low-coordinated oxygen atoms enormously enhanced the cleavage of Fe‒
O bond and CO formation compared to conventional Fe2O3 micropar
ticle, as illustrated in Figure 16a. In addition, the HRTEM images of Fe2
O 3 @SBA-15 (Figure 16b) before and after redox cycles showed no
noticeable morphological discrepancy, suggesting the highly stable struc
ture of Fe2O3@SBA-15 at high temperature.
Apart from modified mesoporous siliceous materials, Ding and his cow
orkers [152,153] employed 3D honeycomb-like silica as substrate to prepare
mesoporous metal oxide (viz., Yb2O3, CeO2, La2O3 and ZrO2) supported Ni
catalysts and assessed their catalytic performances for MPO. Such morpholo
gical structure with great confinement effect provided a strong metal-support
interaction and highly dispersed active sites, governing the CH4 conversion of
90 to 92% and H2/CO ratio of 2 to 3, particular to mesoporous CeO2 and ZrO2
supported Ni catalysts. Based on their DFT computation, they found that the
defect sites of CeO2 and ZrO2 presenting the surface hydroxyl groups could be
substantially restored via reoxidation CeO2 and ZrO2 (due to redox cycles) and
H2O activation, thus promoting the H2 generation. The beneficial effects of
modulating the reducible support structure are also suggested by Singha
et al.[154] in their MPO investigation over 2Pt-CeO2 nanoporous (2Pt-
CeO2NP) spheres. In brief, the high Pt dispersion was readily obtained in the
presence of bimodal CeO2 nanoporous spheres through controlled Pt deposi
tion technique. Contributed to its bimodal pore structure, an average Pt
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 31
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of (a) chemical looping of mpo process and (b) structure and co
selectivity in conventional oxygen carrier vs Fe2O3@SBA-15 oxygen carrier. (b) HRTEM images of (a)
fresh Fe2O3@SBA-15 oxygen carrier and (b) spent Fe2O3@SBA-15 oxygen carrier after 75 redox
cycles. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[151] Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Figure 17. (a and b) FESEM images and (c and d) OF fresh fibrous KCC-1 support at different
magnifications. (b) pictorial depiction of MPO mechanistic over fibrous M/KCC-1 (m = ru, pd, rh)
catalysts. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [53] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
new paradigm development to yield efficient MPO catalysts are mostly based
on new insights into synergistic correlations between catalyst components,
catalysis activity and product selectivity.
Table 2. (Continued).
Reaction conditions
T. J. SIANG ET AL.
ascertaining the kinetic parameters based on the best-fit kinetic model are vital
to optimize the catalyst design and reactor design, leading to enhancement of
MPO respective of cost and energy efficiencies. However, kinetic studies of
MPO are relatively scarce compared to other reforming processes such as MSR
or MDR, and MPO kinetic evaluations might become an important topic in
the near future. In kinetic investigations of LaCr0.85Ru0.15O3 catalyst,
Melchiori et al.[164] applied modified simple rate expressions, whose reaction
orders respect to partial pressure were assumed to match their corresponding
reaction stoichiometric values, to capture the rates of reactant consumption
and product formation (Table 3). To ease the calculations, all reaction rate
constants of 4-reactions mechanism were simply estimated from Arrhenius
equation and water gas shift reaction was assumably an equilibrium process.
Based on the estimated pre-exponential factor and activation energy values,
they evaluated the reaction rates of these 4-reactions mechanism as a function
of the axial coordinate in order to figure out the dependency and changes in
these reactions along with the reactor tube. The results showed that both H2
and CH4 oxidation possessed comparable reaction rates along the reactor
length whilst the MPO was dominant at the front part of reactor under O2-
exessive surrounding. As CH4 and O2 partial pressures reduced along with the
axial of reactor length, CO oxidation rate was remained constant but the H2
oxidation rate became higher owing to the increasing H2 partial pressure. The
analogous method is also used by Bawornruttanaboonya et al.[165] to calculate
the activation energy of reactions considered in the indirect MPO route over
noble
k and P represent the reaction rate constant and partial pressure, whilst the
K is the equilibrium constant.
metal-based catalysts. Besides the abovementioned four reaction mechan
isms, the MSR and MDR were included for the modeling, as shown in Table 3,
which fitted well the experimental data for predicting the CH4 conversion and
product formations.
Unlike the pre-assumed reaction order values in kinetic works of Melchiori
et al.,[164] some authors simplified the empirical power law model to estimate
the CH4 activation energy and reaction order of each reactant based on the
experimental data as shown in Table 4. The empirical power law model for the
MPO process is described in Equation (1). The -rCH4 and k represent the
reaction rate of CH4 and reaction rate constant with P being the reactant
partial pressure, whereas the α and β are corresponding to the reaction orders.
McCormick et al.[166] conducted the MPO experiment under various operat
ing conditions and fitted the data obtained from vanadyl pyrophosphate
(VPO) catalyst to a power law model. The results showed that the reaction
order of CH4 was higher than that of O2, suggesting a greater dependence on
the CH4 partial pressure for syngas production. The approximately zero
reaction order of O2 was probably a result of Mars–van Krevelen redox cycles
38
T. J. SIANG ET AL.
Table 3. The multiple reaction mechanisms involved for the MPO process and the estimated kinetic parameters.
Pre-exponential factor, a Apparent activation energy, EA
(mol kgcat−1 s−1) (kJ mol−1)
No. Reactions Rate models ref.[164] r2 ref.[165] r2 ref.[164] r2 ref.[165] r2
1 5 0.99 - - 84.8 0.99 - -
CH4 partial oxidation:CH4 þ 0:5O2 ! 2H2 þ CO r1 ¼ k1 PCH4 PO0:52 1:21 � 10
2 H2 oxidation:H2 þ 0:5O2 ! H2 O r2 ¼ k2 PH2 PO0:52 2:61 � 104 0.99 2:8 � 102 0.99 49.4 0.99 43 0.99
3 CO oxidation:CO þ 0:5O2 ! CO2 2 0.99 0.99 17.1 0.99 45 0.99
r3 ¼ k3 PCO PO0:52 3:04 � 10 1:3 � 102
�
4 Water gas shift reaction:H2 O þ CO Ð H2 þ CO2 r4 ¼ k4 PCO PH2 O K1 PCO2 PH2 1:71 � 106 0.99 5:7 � 102 0.99 102.2 0.99 84 0.99
Table 4. Summary of kinetic parameters derived from power law models of MPO over different
catalysts.
Reaction order
Activation energy, EA
(kJ mol−1) α β
Temperature
Catalysts (oC) CH4 CH4 O2 References
[166]
VPO 300‒425 102 0.73 0.08
[167]
FePO4 450‒700 164 0.66 0.45
[167]
FePO4/SiO2 450‒700 144 0.61 0.28
with fast catalyst reoxidation. The similar lower reaction order for O2 due to
redox properties of catalyst is also suggested by the findings of Alptekin
et al.[167] From Table 4, the reaction order of CH4 was greater than that of
O2 which indicates that CH4 adsorption on the active sites of catalyst is the
dominant step for MPO.
α β
rCH4 ¼ kPCH P
4 O2
(1)
Figure 18. (a) Kinetically coupled catalytic CH4 dry and steam reforming cycles over Ni0 assisted by
CH4 total oxidation cycle. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[168] Copyright 2014, Elsevier. (b)
Effect of O2 partial pressure on the ratio of steady-state coverage by molecularly adsorbed
O species to atomic o species estimated using kinetic parameters in Table 6. The numbers in the
plot represent the diameter of rh np on γ-Al2O3 in nm. (c) Apparent rate constant of CH4 activation
over differently sized rh np on γ-al2o3 as determined from CH4/Ar = 1:1 (white circle), CH4/O2
/Ar = 2:1:2 (gray circle) and CH4:Co2/Ar = 1:1:1 (black circle). Reproduced with permission from Ref.
[114]
Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.
determining cycle during indirect MPO process. This revealed that the MSR
and MSR cycles promptly consumed the H2O and CO2 with a rate regu
lated by the sluggish kinetic cycle of CH4 total oxidation for overall MPO
process. To intrinsically describe the rate of two-step sequences combus
tion-reforming mechanism in the indirect process of MPO, Nguyen and the
coworkers[169] further developed the classical power law modeling based on
Quasi-Steady State Approximation (QSSA) theory, as demonstrated in
Table 5. Using the developed power rate law expressions (Equations. 2
and 3 in Table 5), both computed and experimental values of CH4 conver
sion as a function of contact time were utterly consistent in sequential CH4
total oxidation and MDR cycles. These best-fitted rate expressions further
affirmed that the rate of CH4 total oxidation cycle was the rate determining
cycle for the overall indirect MPO process.
Table 5 Representative 2-step sequences of combustion-reforming kinetic rate models for indirect MPO over Ni0/La2O3 [170].
Assumption Mechanism Kinetic rate model Eq.
� �
CH4 total oxidation occurs k7 k7 (2)
CH4 þ La O !fCH4 g � � � � � O LaðRDSÞ ½L�k7 k9 PCH4
over La2O3 support. k8 rMTO ¼ k
La þ La La þ La OH 1þk7 ðPCH4 Þ
fCH4 g � � � � � O O ! CH3 O 9
CH4 molecular k9
CH3 O La ! :::::
adsorption on La2O3 as (other unspecified steps
RDS. which are not crucial steps kinetically
resulting in H2O and CO2 products)
k10
2La þ O2 ! 2La O
CH4 dry reforming occurs k11 k11 PCH4 (3)
CH4 þ 2X ! CH3 X þH X ðRDSÞ k14 PCO
2 �
over Ni0 where the CO2 k12
rMDR ¼ ½L�k14 PCO2 �
k PCH
being originated from CH3 X þ X ! CHy X þH X; 1 � y � 3 1þk11 P 4
14 CO2
Table 6. Micro-kinetic models employed in kinetic modeling of activation for CH4, O2 and CO2.
Reproduced with permission from Ref.[114] Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.
Model Elementary steps Rate constants (s−1)
1 CH4 þ X ! products eff
kreac ðCH4 Þa
2 O2 þ X ! O2 X eff
kads ðO2 Þa
O2 X ! O2 þ X kdes ðO2 Þ
O2 X þ X ! 2O X eff
kdiss ðO2 Þa
2O X ! O2 XþX kass ðO2 Þb
3 CO2 þ X ! CO2 X eff
kads ðCO2 Þa
CO2 X ! CO2 þ X kdes ðCO2 Þ
CO2 X þ X ! CO X þ O X eff
kdiss ðCO2 Þa
CO X þO X ! CO2 XþX kass ðCO2 Þb
eff eff
Note the kads ¼ CX � kads and kdiss ¼ CX � kdis where the CX is active site concentration.
The power law modeling has been extensively applied to estimate the
apparent kinetic parameters due to its simplicity excluding the understanding
of mechanism. However, this empirical model might inaccurate and inapplic
able for wide-ranging reaction conditions, which fails to reflect the reaction
elementary steps on catalyst surface associated with its properties. On this
basis, in order to correlate the interaction kinetic of reactant gases and particle
sizes of Rh/γ-Al2O3, Kondratenko et al.[114] derived the microkinetic models
(Table 7) and employed them in kinetic assessments of experimental responses
for CH4, O2 and CO2.
Table 7. Estimated kinetic parameters of O2 and CO2 activation over Rh/γ-Al2O3 with different
nanoparticle (NP) sizes.[114].
For o2 activation:
eff eff
kads ðO2 Þ kdes ðO2 Þ kdiss ðO2 Þ kass ðO2 Þ
–1
Catalyst (s ) (s−1) (s−1) (m3 mol−1 s−1)
Rh NP (1.1 nm)/γ-Al2O3 7:4 � 103 9.7 7:3 � 101 3:7 � 102
Rh NP (2.5 nm)/γ-Al2O3 5:2 � 103 1:4 � 10 2
4:9 � 101 7:4 � 102
Rh NP (2.9 nm)/γ-Al2O3 4:3 � 103 7:4 � 101 1:1 � 102 2:6 � 102
Rh NP (3.7 nm)/γ-Al2O3 2:6 � 103 3.2 2:0 � 102 1:3 � 101
Rh NP (5.5 nm)/γ-Al2O3 1:0 � 103 2.7 1:1 � 102 1:0 � 101
Rh NP (1.1 nm)/γ-Al2O3 1:0 � 103 1:2 � 102 1:0 � 101 6:6 � 103
Rh NP (2.5 nm)/γ-Al2O3 9:1 � 102 4:4 � 102 5.4 3:8 � 103
Rh NP (2.9 nm)/γ-Al2O3 9:7 � 102 2:0 � 102 6.4 5:5 � 103
Rh NP (3.7 nm)/γ-Al2O3 8:9 � 102 1:3 � 102 6.0 5:3 � 103
Rh NP (5.5 nm)/γ-Al2O3 6:8 � 102 5:4 � 102 6.4 3:2 � 102
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 43
Abbreviations
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial aid by the Transdisciplinary Research Grant
(No. 06G52 and 06G53) from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and the Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia Zamalah Scholarship (Tan Ji Siang) for this work.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
ORCID
T.J. Siang http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-674X
A.A. Jalil http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-3168
S.Y. Liew http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5802-066X
References
[1] Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser. CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://ourworl
dindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions; 2020 (accessed Mar 22, 2022).
[2] Friedlingstein, P.; Jones, M.; O’sullivan, M.; Andrew, R.; Hauck, J.; Peters, G.;
DBakker, O. Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2019, 11(4), 1783‒
1838. DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019.
46 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[3] Peters, G. P.; Andrew, R. M.; Canadell, J. G.; Friedlingstein, P.; Jackson, R. B.;
Korsbakken, J. I.; Peregon, A.; Peregon, A. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Continue to
Grow Amidst Slowly Emerging Climate Policies. Nat. Clim. Change. 2020, 10(1), 3–6.
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0659-6.
[4] Kan, S. Y.; Chen, B.; Wu, X. F.; Chen, Z. M.; Chen, G. Q. Natural Gas Overview for
World Economy: From Primary Supply to Final Demand via Global Supply Chains.
Energy Policy. 2019, 124, 215–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.002.
[5] Dos Santos, R. G.; Alencar, A. C. Biomass-derived Syngas Production via Gasification
Process and Its Catalytic Conversion into Fuels by Fischer Tropsch Synthesis: A Review.
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020, 45(36), 18114‒18132. DOI: 10.1016/j.
ijhydene.2019.07.133.
[6] Minh, D. P.; Siang, T. J.; Vo, D. V. N.; Phan, T. S.; Ridart, C.; Nzihou, A.; Grouset, D.
Hydrogen Production from Biogas Reforming: An Overview of Steam Reforming, Dry
Reforming, Dual Reforming, and Tri-reforming of Methane. In Hydrogen Supply Chains;
Azzaro-Pantel, C., Ed.; Academic Press: London, 2018; pp 111–166.
[7] Research and Markets Ltd. Syngas & Derivatives Market by Production Technology,
Gasifier Type, Feedstock (Coal, Natural Gas, Petroleum Byproducts, Biomass/waste),
application (chemicals, fuel, and electricity), and region - Global Forecast to 2025,
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/; 2021 (accessed Oct 25, 2021).
[8] Mordor Intelligence. Syngas market‒Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2022-2027). https://
www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/syngas-market; 2021 (accessed Mar 22,
2022).
[9] Lee, N. Smaller-scale and Modular Technologies Drive GTL Industry Forward. http://
www.gasprocessingnews.com/features/201706/smaller-scale-and-modular-technologies
-drive-gtl-industry-forward.aspx/; 2020 (accessed Oct 25, 2021).
[10] Abdullah, B.; Abd Ghani, N. A.; Vo, D. V. N. Recent Advances in Dry Reforming of
Methane over Ni-based Catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 170–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.
jclepro.2017.05.176.
[11] Wang, B.; Albarracín-Suazo, S.; Pagán-Torres, Y.; Nikolla, E. Advances in Methane
Conversion Processes. Catal. Today. 2017, 285, 147‒158. DOI: 10.1016/j.
cattod.2017.01.023.
[12] Siang, T. J.; Pham, T. L.; Van Cuong, N.; Phuong, P. T.; Phuc, N. H. H.; Truong, Q. D.;
Vo, D. V. N. Combined Steam and CO2 Reforming of Methane for Syngas Production
over Carbon-resistant Boron-promoted Ni/SBA-15 Catalysts. Micro. Meso. Mater. 2018,
262, 122–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.028.
[13] Subraveti, S. G.; Roussanaly, S.; Anantharaman, R.; Riboldi, L.; Rajendran, A. Techno-
economic Assessment of Optimised Vacuum Swing Adsorption for Post-combustion
CO2 Capture from Steam-methane Reformer Flue Gas. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 256,
117832. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117832.
[14] Pantaleo, G.; La Parola, V.; Deganello, F.; Singha, R. K.; Bal, R.; Venezia, A. M. Ni/CeO2
Catalysts for Methane Partial Oxidation: Synthesis Driven Structural and Catalytic
Effects. Appl. Catal. B–Environ. 2016, 189, 233–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.064.
[15] The Global Syngas Technologies Council. Partial Oxidation. https://globalsyngas.org/
syngas-technology/syngas-production/partial-oxidation/; 2018 (accessed Oct 25, 2021).
[16] Linde. Partial Oxidation. Linde Engineering. https://www.linde-engineering.com/en/
process-plants/hydrogen_and_synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/partial_oxidation/
index.html/; 2020 (accessed Oct 25, 2021).
[17] Liander, H The Utilisation of Natural Gases for the Ammonia Process. Trans. Faraday
Soc. 1929, 25, 462‒472. DOI: 10.1039/TF9292500462.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 47
[18] Prettre, M.; Eichner, C.; Perrin, M. The Catalytic Oxidation of Methane to Carbon
Monoxide and Hydrogen. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1946, 42, 335b–339. DOI: 10.1039/
TF946420335B.
[19] Huszar, K.; Racz, G.; Szekely, G. The Catalytic Oxidation of Methane to Carbon
Monoxide and Hydrogen. Acta Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1971, 70, 287. DOI: 10.1039/
TF946420335b.
[20] Gavalas, G. R.; Phichitkul, C.; Voecks, G. E. Structure and Activity of NiOα-Al2O3 and
NiOZrO2 Calcined at High Temperatures: I. Structure. J. Catal. 1984, 88(1), 54‒64. DOI:
10.1016/0021-9517(84)90049-6.
[21] Gavalas, G. R.; Phichitkul, C.; Voecks, G. E. Structure and Activity of NiOα-Al2O3 and
NiOZrO2 Calcined at High Temperatures: II. Activity in the Fuel-rich Oxidation of
Methane. J. Catal. 1984, 88(1), 65‒72. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(84)90050-2.
[22] Ashcroft, A. T.; Cheetham, A. K.; Foord, J. A.; Green, M. L. H.; Grey, C. P.; Murrell, A. J.;
Vernon, P. D. F. Selective Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas Using Transition
Metal Catalysts. Nature. 1990, 344(6264), 319‒321. DOI: 10.1038/344319a0.
[23] Hickman, D. A.; Schmidt, L. D. Steps in CH4 Oxidation on Pt and Rh Surfaces:
High-temperature Reactor Simulations. AIChE J. 1993, 39(7), 1164‒1177. DOI:
10.1002/aic.690390708.
[24] Hickman, D. A.; Schmidt, L. D. Production of Syngas by Direct Catalytic Oxidation of
Methane. Science. 1993, 259(5093), 343‒346. DOI: 10.1126/science.259.5093.343.
[25] Choudhary, V. R.; Prabhakar, B.; Rajput, A. M. Beneficial Effects of Noble Metal
Addition to Ni/Al2O3 Catalyst for Oxidative Methane-to-syngas Conversion. J. Catal.
1995, 157(2), 752‒754. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1995.1342.
[26] Ji, Y.; Li, W.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y. A Study on the Ignition Process for the Catalytic Partial
Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas by MS-TPSR Technique. Catal. Lett. 2001, 71(1),
45‒48. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016648106910.
[27] Enger, B. C.; Lødeng, R.; Holmen, A. A Review of Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane
to Synthesis Gas with Emphasis on Reaction Mechanisms over Transition Metal
Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2008, 346(1‒2), 1‒27. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.018.
[28] Panov, G. I.; Starokon, E. V.; Ivanov, D. P.; Pirutko, L. V.; Kharitonov, A. S. Active and
Super Active Oxygen on Metals in Comparison with Metal Oxides. Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng.
2021, 63(4), 597–638. DOI: 10.1080/01614940.2020.1778389.
[29] Mackie, J. C Partial Oxidation of Methane: The Role of the Gas Phase Reactions. Catal.
Rev. -Sci. Eng. 1991, 33(1–2), 169–240. DOI: 10.1080/01614949108020299.
[30] Zhu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shan, J. J.; Nguyen, L.; Zhan, S.; Gu, X.; Tao, F. In Situ Surface
Chemistries and Catalytic Performances of Ceria Doped with Palladium, Platinum, and
Rhodium in Methane Partial Oxidation for the Production of Syngas. ACS Catal. 2013, 3
(11), 2627–2639. DOI: 10.1021/cs400070y.
[31] Meng, Y.; Ding, C.; Gao, X.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, Z. Adsorption of Pd on the Cu (1 1 1)
Surface and Its Catalysis of Methane Partial Oxidation: A Density Functional Theory
Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 513, 145724. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145724.
[32] Mishra, A.; Shafiefarhood, A.; Dou, J.; Li, F. Rh Promoted Perovskites for Exceptional
“Low Temperature” Methane Conversion to Syngas. Catal. Today. 2020, 350, 149‒155.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.05.036.
[33] Rocha, K. D. O.; Macedo, W. C.; Marques, C. M.; Bueno, J. M. Pt/Al2O3La2O3 Catalysts
Stable at High Temperature in Air, Prepared Using a “One-pot” Sol–gel Process:
Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Activity in the Partial Oxidation of CH4.
Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 229, 115966. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115966.
[34] Bartholomew, C. H Mechanisms of Catalyst Deactivation. Appl. Catal. A–Gen. 2001, 212
(1–2), 17–60. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7.
48 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[50] Basile, F.; Fornasari, G.; Gazzano, M.; Kiennemann, A.; Vaccari, A. Preparation and
Characterisation of a Stable Rh Catalyst for the Partial Oxidation of Methane. J. Catal.
2003, 217(2), 245‒252. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00021-6.
[51] Kim, P.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; Song, I. K.; Yi, J. Synthesis and Characterization of
Mesoporous Alumina with Nickel Incorporated for Use in the Partial Oxidation of
Methane into Synthesis Gas. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2004, 272(1‒2), 157‒166. DOI:
10.1016/j.apcata.2004.05.055.
[52] Liu, T.; Snyder, C.; Veser, G. Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane: Is a Distinction
between Direct and Indirect Pathways Meaningful? Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46(26),
9045‒9052. DOI: 10.1021/ie070062z.
[53] Siang, T. J.; Jalil, A. A.; Hamid, M. Y. S.; Abdulrasheed, A. A.; Abdullah, T. A. T.;
Vo, D. V. N. Role of Oxygen Vacancies in Dendritic Fibrous M/KCC-1 (M= Ru, Pd, Rh)
Catalysts for Methane Partial Oxidation to H2-rich Syngas Production. Fuel. 2020, 278,
118360. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118360.
[54] Nguyen, T. H.; Łamacz, A.; Beaunier, P.; Czajkowska, S.; Domański, M.; Krztoń, A.; Van
Le, T.; Djéga-Mariadassou, G. Partial Oxidation of Methane over Bifunctional Catalyst
I. In Situ Formation of Ni0/La2O3 during Temperature Programmed POM Reaction over
LaNiO3 Perovskite. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2014, 152, 360‒369. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2014.01.053.
[55] Makarshin, L. L.; Sadykov, V. A.; Andreev, D. V.; Gribovskii, A. G.; Privezentsev, V. V.;
Parmon, V. N. Syngas Production by Partial Oxidation of Methane in a Microchannel
Reactor over a Ni–Pt/La0.2Zr0.4Ce0.4Ox Catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 131, 21‒28.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.10.031.
[56] Cheng, Z.; Qin, L.; Guo, M.; Xu, M.; Fan, J. A.; Fan, L. S. Oxygen Vacancy Promoted
Methane Partial Oxidation over Iron Oxide Oxygen Carriers in the Chemical Looping
Process. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18(47), 32418‒32428. DOI: 10.1039/
C6CP06264D.
[57] Jabbour, K Tuning Combined Steam and Dry Reforming of Methane for “Metgas”
Production: A Thermodynamic Approach and State-of-the-art Catalysts. J. Energy
Chem. 2020, 48, 54‒91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.017.
[58] Wang, F.; Li, W. Z.; Lin, J. D.; Chen, Z. Q.; Wang, Y. Crucial Support Effect on the
Durability of Pt/MgAl2O4 for Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas. Appl. Catal.
B-Environ. 2018, 231, 292‒298. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.018.
[59] Li, B.; Maruyama, K.; Nurunnabi, M.; Kunimori, K.; Tomishige, K. Temperature Profiles
of Alumina-supported Noble Metal Catalysts in Autothermal Reforming of Methane.
Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2004, 275(1‒2), 157‒172. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.07.047.
[60] Deutschmann, O.; Schmidt, L. D. Modeling the Partial Oxidation of Methane in a
Short-contact-time Reactor. AIChE J. 1998, 44(11), 2465‒2477. DOI: 10.1002/
aic.690441114.
[61] Salehi, M. S.; Askarishahi, M.; Godini, H. R.; Schomäcker, R.; Wozny, G. CFD
Simulation of Oxidative Coupling of Methane in Fluidized-bed Reactors: A Detailed
Analysis of Flow-reaction Characteristics and Operating Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 2016, 55(5), 1149‒1163. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02433.
[62] Partopour, B.; Dixon, A. G. Reduced Microkinetics Model for Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) Simulation of the Fixed-bed Partial Oxidation of Ethylene. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 2016, 55(27), 7296‒7306. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00526.
[63] Carrera, A.; Beretta, A.; Groppi, G. Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Iso-octane over Rh/α-
Al2O3 in an Adiabatic Reactor: An Experimental and Modeling Study. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 2017, 56(17), 4911‒4919. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00255.
50 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[64] Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T.; Yu, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, T. Simulations of Methane Partial
Oxidation by CFD Coupled with Detailed Chemistry at Industrial Operating Conditions.
Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 142, 126‒136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.11.010.
[65] Banke, K.; Hegner, R.; Schröder, D.; Schulz, C.; Atakan, B.; Kaiser, S. A. Power and
Syngas Production from Partial Oxidation of Fuel-rich methane/DME Mixtures in an
HCCI Engine. Fuel. 2019, 243, 97‒103. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.076.
[66] Gopaul, S. G.; Dutta, A. Dry Reforming of Multiple Biogas Types for Syngas Production
Simulated Using Aspen Plus: The Use of Partial Oxidation and Hydrogen Combustion
to Achieve Thermo-neutrality. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015, 40(19), 6307‒6318. DOI:
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.079.
[67] Ma, Y.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, S.; Li, Q.; Hu, X.; Dong, D.; Buckley, C. E.; Dong, D. Highly
Stable Nanofibrous La2NiZrO6 Catalysts for Fast Methane Partial Oxidation. Fuel. 2020,
265, 116861. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116861.
[68] Guo, J.; Ding, C.; Ma, Z.; Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Shangguan, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, M.; Li, Y.;
Wang, M. Highly Dispersed and Stable Pt Clusters Encapsulated within ZSM-5 with Aid
of Sodium Ion for Partial Oxidation of Methane. Fuel. 2021, 289, 119839. DOI: 10.1016/j.
fuel.2020.119839.
[69] Sheppard, T.; Hamill, C. D.; Goguet, A.; Rooney, D. W.; Thompson, J. M. A Low
Temperature, Isothermal Gas-phase System for Conversion of Methane to Methanol
over Cu–ZSM-5. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50(75), 11053‒11055. DOI: 10.1039/
C4CC02832E.
[70] Zhu, J.; Sushkevich, V. L.; Knorpp, A. J.; Newton, M. A.; Mizuno, S. C.; Wakihara, T.; van
Bokhoven, J. A.; Liu, Z.; van Bokhoven, J. A. Cu-erionite Zeolite Achieves High Yield in
Direct Oxidation of Methane to Methanol by Isothermal Chemical Looping. Chem.
Mater. 2020, 32(4), 1448‒1453. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04223.
[71] Shen, X.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Jiang, E.; Xu, X.; Jia, Z.; Jia, Z. The Coupling of CH4
Partial Oxidation and CO2 Splitting for Syngas Production via Double Perovskite-type
Oxides LaFexCo1−xO3. Fuel. 2020, 268, 117381. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117381.
[72] Zhang, X.; Pei, C.; Chang, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, R.; Zhao, Z. J.; Gong, J. FeO6 Octahedral
Distortion Activates Lattice Oxygen in Perovskite Ferrite for Methane Partial Oxidation
Coupled with CO2 Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142(26), 11540‒11549. DOI:
10.1021/jacs.0c04643.
[73] Cruellas, A.; Melchiori, T.; Gallucci, F.; van Sint Annaland, M. Advanced Reactor
Concepts for Oxidative Coupling of Methane. Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng. 2017, 59(3), 234‒
294. DOI: 10.1080/01614940.2017.1348085.
[74] Liu, R.; Pei, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Zeng, L.; Mu, R. Chemical Looping Partial
Oxidation over FeWO <sub>/<sub>sio2 Catalysts. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2020, 41
(7), 1140‒1141. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016648106910.
[75] Guo, D.; Wang, G. C. Partial Oxdation of Methane on Anatase and Rutile Defective TiO2
Supported Rh4 Cluster: A Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017, 121
(47), 22630. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07489.
[76] Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Song, W.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, X. Hetero-
metallic Active Sites in Omega (MAZ) Zeolite-catalyzed Methane Partial Oxidation:
A DFT Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60(6), 2400‒2409. DOI: 10.1021/acs.
iecr.0c05457.
[77] Mahyuddin, M. H.; Tanaka, T.; Shiota, Y.; Staykov, A.; Yoshizawa, K. Methane Partial
Oxidation over [Cu2(μ-O)]2+ and [Cu3(μ-O)3]2+ Active Species in Large-pore Zeolites.
ACS Catal. 2018, 8(2), 1500‒1509. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03389.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 51
[78] Guo, D.; Wen, J. H.; Wang, G. C. Coordination Dependence of Carbon Deposition
Resistance in Partial Oxidation of Methane on Rh Catalysts. Catal. Today. 2020, 355,
422‒434. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.07.017.
[79] Shafiefarhood, A.; Zhang, J.; Neal, L. M.; Li, F. Rh-promoted Mixed Oxides for “Low-
temperature” Methane Partial Oxidation in the Absence of Gaseous Oxidants. J. Mater.
Chem. A. 2017, 5(23), 11930‒11939. DOI: 10.1039/C7TA01398A.
[80] Shafiefarhood, A.; Hamill, J. C.; Neal, L. M.; Li, F. Methane Partial Oxidation Using FeOx
@La0.8Sr0.2FeO3−δ Core–shell Catalyst–transient Pulse Studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2015, 17(46), 31297‒31307. DOI: 10.1039/C5CP05583K.
[81] Mallens, E. P. J.; Hoebink, J. H. B. J.; Marin, G. B. The Reaction Mechanism of the Partial
Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas: A Transient Kinetic Study over Rhodium and
A Comparison with Platinum. J. Catal. 1997, 167(1), 43‒56. DOI: 10.1006/
jcat.1997.1533.
[82] Mudu, F.; Olsbye, U.; Arstad, B.; Diplas, S.; Li, Y.; Fjellvåg, H. Aluminium Substituted
Lanthanum Based Perovskite Type Oxides, Non-stoichiometry and Performance in
Methane Partial Oxidation by Framework Oxygen. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2016, 523,
171‒181. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.05.013.
[83] Costa, D. S.; Gomes, R. S.; Rodella, C. B.; da Silva Junior, R. B.; Frety, R.; Neto, É. T.;
Brandão, S. T. Study of Nickel, Lanthanum and Niobium-based Catalysts Applied in the
Partial Oxidation of Methane. Catal. Today. 2020, 344, 15‒23. DOI: 10.1016/j.
cattod.2018.10.022.
[84] de Sousa, L. F.; Toniolo, F. S.; Landi, S. M.; Schmal, M. Investigation of Structures and
Metallic Environment of the Ni/Nb2O5 by Different in Situ treatments–Effect on the
Partial Oxidation of Methane. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2017, 537, 100‒110. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcata.2017.03.015.
[85] Araújo, J. C.; Oton, L. F.; Bessa, B.; Neto, A. B.; Oliveira, A. C.; Lang, R.; Otubo, L.;
Bueno, J. M. The Role of Pt Loading on La2O3-Al2O3 Support for Methane Conversion
Reactions via Partial Oxidation and Steam Reforming. Fuel. 2019, 254, 115681. DOI:
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115681.
[86] Chen, S.; Zeng, L.; Tian, H.; Li, X.; Gong, J. Enhanced Lattice Oxygen Reactivity over
Ni-modified WO3-based Redox Catalysts for Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation of
Methane. ACS Catal. 2017, 7(5), 3548‒3559. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00436.
[87] Thomas, D. J.; Willi, R.; Baiker, A. Partial Oxidation of Methane: The Role of Surface
Reactions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31(10), 2272‒2278. DOI: 10.1021/ie00010a003.
[88] Hohn, K. L.; Schmidt, L. D. Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas at High Space
Velocities over Rh-coated Spheres. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2001, 211(1), 53‒68. DOI:
10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00835-8.
[89] Minh, D. P.; Pham, X. H.; Siang, T. J.; Vo, D. V. N. Review on the Catalytic
Tri-reforming of methane-Part I: Impact of Operating Conditions, Catalyst
Deactivation and Regeneration. Appl. Catal. A–Gen. 2021, 621, 118202. DOI: 10.1016/
j.apcata.2021.118202.
[90] Wu, J.; Helveg, S.; Ullmann, S.; Peng, Z.; Bell, A. T. Growth of Encapsulating Carbon on
Supported Pt Nanoparticles Studied by in Situ TEM. J. Catal. 2016, 338, 295‒304. DOI:
10.1016/j.jcat.2016.03.010.
[91] Xu, J.; Saeys, M. Improving the Coking Resistance of Ni-based Catalysts by Promotion
with Subsurface Boron. J. Catal. 2006, 242(1), 217–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.029.
[92] Torrez-Herrera, J. J.; Korili, S. A.; Gil, A. Recent Progress in the Application of Ni-based
Catalysts for the Dry Reforming of Methane. Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng. 2021, 1–58. DOI:
10.1080/01614940.2021.2006891.
52 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[93] Abdulrasheed, A.; Jalil, A. A.; Gambo, Y.; Ibrahim, M.; Hambali, H. U.; Hamid, M. Y. S.
A Review on Catalyst Development for Dry Reforming of Methane to Syngas: Recent
Advances. Renew. Sus. Energy Rev. 2019, 108, 175–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.054.
[94] Djéga-Mariadassou, G.; Boudart, M. Classical Kinetics of Catalytic Reactions. J. Catal.
2003, 216(1–2), 89–97. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00099-4.
[95] Lee, S. J.; Jun, J. H.; Lee, S. H.; Yoon, K. J.; Lim, T. H.; Nam, S. W.; Hong, S. A. Partial
Oxidation of Methane over Nickel-added Strontium Phosphate. Appl. Catal. A–Gen.
2002, 230(1–2), 61–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00995-4.
[96] Luo, Z.; Kriz, D. A.; Miao, R.; Kuo, C. H.; Zhong, W.; Guild, C.; He, J.; Willis, B.;
Dang, Y.; Suib, S. L., et al. TiO2 Supported Gold–palladium Catalyst for Effective Syngas
Production from Methane Partial Oxidation. Appl. Catal. A–Gen. 2018, 554, 54–63. DOI:
10.1016/j.apcata.2018.01.020.
[97] Mattos, L. V.; De Oliveira, E. R.; Resende, P. D.; Noronha, F. B.; Passos, F. B. Partial
Oxidation of Methane on Pt/Ce–ZrO2 Catalysts. Catal. Today. 2002, 77(3), 245–256.
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00250-X.
[98] Yan, Q. G.; Wu, T. H.; Weng, W. Z.; Toghiani, H.; Toghiani, R. K.; Wan, H. L.;
Pittman, C. U., Jr Partial Oxidation of Methane to H2 and CO over Rh/SiO2 and
Ru/SiO2 Catalysts. J. Catal. 2004, 226(2), 247–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.05.028.
[99] Fleys, M.; Simon, Y.; Swierczynski, D.; Kiennemann, A.; Marquaire, P. M. Investigation
of the Reaction of Partial Oxidation of Methane over Ni/La2O3 Catalyst. Energy Fuels.
2006, 20(6), 2321–2329. DOI: 10.1021/ef0602729.
[100] Rabe, S.; Nachtegaal, M.; Vogel, F. Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis
Gas over a Ruthenium Catalyst: The Role of the Oxidation State. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2007, 9(12), 1461–1468. DOI: 10.1039/B617529E.
[101] Stötzel, J.; Frahm, R.; Kimmerle, B.; Nachtegaal, M.; Grunwaldt, J. D. Oscillatory
Behavior during the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane: Following Dynamic
Structural Changes of Palladium Using the QEXAFS Technique. J. Phys. Chem. C.
2012, 116(1), 599–609. DOI: 10.1021/jp2052294.
[102] Velasco, J. A.; Fernandez, C.; Lopez, L.; Cabrera, S.; Boutonnet, M.; Järås, S. Catalytic
Partial Oxidation of Methane over Nickel and Ruthenium Based Catalysts under Low O2
/CH4 Ratios and with Addition of Steam. Fuel. 2015, 153, 192–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.
fuel.2015.03.009.
[103] Grunwaldt, J. D.; Hannemann, S.; Schroer, C. G.; Baiker, A. 2D-mapping of the Catalyst
Structure inside a Catalytic Microreactor at Work: Partial Oxidation of Methane over
Rh/Al2O3. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110(17), 8674–8680. DOI: 10.1021/jp060371n.
[104] Pan, C. J.; Tsai, M. C.; Su, W. N.; Rick, J.; Akalework, N. G.; Agegnehu, A. K.;
Cheng, S. Y.; Hwang, B. J. Tuning/exploiting Strong Metal-support Interaction (SMSI)
in Heterogeneous Catalysis. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 74, 154–186. DOI: 10.1016/
j.jtice.2017.02.012.
[105] Kang, D.; Lim, H. S.; Lee, M.; Lee, J. W. Syngas Production on a Ni-enhanced Fe2O3/Al2
O3 Oxygen Carrier via Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation with Dry Reforming of
Methane. Appl. Energy. 2018, 211, 174‒186. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.018.
[106] Li, L.; Dostagir, M. D.; Shrotri, A.; Fukuoka, A.; Kobayashi, H. Partial Oxidation of
Methane to Syngas via Formate Intermediate Found for a Ruthenium–rhenium
Bimetallic Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2021, 11(7), 3782‒3789. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c05491.
[107] Gil-Calvo, M.; Jimenez-Gonzalez, C.; de Rivas, B.; Gutiérrez-Ortiz, J. I.; Lopez-Fonseca,
R. Effect of Ni/Al Molar Ratio on the Performance of Substoichiometric NiAl2O4
Spinel-based Catalysts for Partial Oxidation of Methane. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2017,
209, 128‒138. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.063.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 53
[108] Pal, P.; Singha, R. K.; Saha, A.; Bal, R.; Panda, A. B. Defect-induced Efficient Partial
Oxidation of Methane over Nonstoichiometric Ni/CeO2 Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C.
2015, 119(24), 13610‒13618. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01724.
[109] Singha, R. K.; Ghosh, S.; Acharyya, S. S.; Yadav, A.; Shukla, A.; Sasaki, T.; Venezia, A. M.;
Pendem, C.; Bal, R. Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas over Pt Nanoparticles
Supported on Nanocrystalline CeO2 Catalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6(12), 4601‒
4615. DOI: 10.1039/C5CY02088C.
[110] Pantaleo, G.; La Parola, V.; Deganello, F.; Calatozzo, P.; Bal, R.; Venezia, A. M. Synthesis
and Support Composition Effects on CH4 Partial Oxidation over Ni–CeLa Oxides. Appl.
Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 164, 135‒143. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.011.
[111] Li, D.; Sakai, S.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomishige, K. FTIR Study of CO Adsorption on Rh/MgO
Modified with CO, Ni, Fe, or CeO2 for the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane. Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14(25), 9204‒9213. DOI: 10.1039/C2CP41050H.
[112] Kaddeche, D.; Djaidja, A.; Barama, A. Partial Oxidation of Methane on Co-precipitated
Ni–Mg/Al Catalysts Modified with Copper or Iron. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017, 42(22),
15002‒15009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.281.
[113] Emamdoust, A.; La Parola, V.; Pantaleo, G.; Testa, M. L.; Shayesteh, S. F.; Venezia, A. M.
Partial Oxidation of Methane over SiO2 Supported Ni and NiCe Catalysts. J. Energy
Chem. 2020, 47, 1‒9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.11.019.
[114] Kondratenko, V. A.; Berger-Karin, C.; Kondratenko, E. V. Partial Oxidation of Methane
to Syngas over γ-Al2O3-supported Rh Nanoparticles: Kinetic and Mechanistic Origins of
Size Effect on Selectivity and Activity. ACS Catal. 2014, 4(9), 3136‒3144. DOI: 10.1021/
cs5002465.
[115] Berger-Karin, C.; Sebek, M.; Pohl, M. M.; Bentrup, U.; Kondratenko, V. A.; Steinfeldt, N.;
Kondratenko, E. V. Tailored Noble Metal Nanoparticles on γ‒Al2O3 for High
Temperature CH4 Conversion to Syngas. ChemCatChem. 2012, 4(9), 1368‒1375. DOI:
10.1002/cctc.201200096.
[116] Goodman, E. D.; Latimer, A. A.; Yang, A. C.; Wu, L.; Tahsini, N.; Abild-Pedersen, F.;
Cargnello, M. Low-temperature Methane Partial Oxidation to Syngas with Modular
Nanocrystal Catalysts. ACS Appl. Nano. Mater. 2018, 1(9), 5258‒5267. DOI: 10.1021/
acsanm.8b01256.
[117] Boukha, Z.; Gil-Calvo, M.; de Rivas, B.; González-Velasco, J. R.; Gutiérrez-Ortiz, J. I.;
López-Fonseca, R. Behaviour of Rh Supported on Hydroxyapatite Catalysts in Partial
Oxidation and Steam Reforming of Methane: On the Role of the Speciation of the Rh
Particles. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2018, 556, 191‒203. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.03.002.
[118] Boukha, Z.; Jiménez-González, C.; Gil-Calvo, M.; de Rivas, B.; González-Velasco, J. R.;
Gutiérrez-Ortiz, J. I.; López-Fonseca, R. MgO/NiAl2O4 as a New Formulation of
Reforming Catalysts: Tuning the Surface Properties for the Enhanced Partial
Oxidation of Methane. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2016, 199, 372‒383. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2016.06.045.
[119] Jang, W. J.; Shim, J. O.; Kim, H. M.; Yoo, S. Y.; Roh, H. S. A Review on Dry Reforming of
Methane in Aspect of Catalytic Properties. Catal. Today. 2019, 324, 15‒26. DOI:
10.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.032.
[120] Aziz, M. A. A.; Jalil, A. A.; Wongsakulphasatch, S.; Vo, D. V. N. Understanding the Role
of Surface Basic Sites of Catalysts in CO2 Activation in Dry Reforming of Methane:
A Short Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10(1), 35‒45. DOI: 10.1039/C9CY01519A.
[121] Chen, L.; Qi, Z.; Zhang, S.; Su, J.; Somorjai, G. A. Catalytic Hydrogen Production from
Methane: A Review on Recent Progress and Prospect. Catal. 2020, 10(8), 858. DOI:
10.3390/catal10080858.
54 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[135] Toscani, L. M.; Bellora, M. S.; Huck-Iriart, C.; Soldati, A. L.; Sacanell, J.; Martins, T. S.;
Craievich, A.; Fantini, M. C.; Larrondo, S. A.; Lamas, D. G. NiO/CeO2-Sm2O3
Nanocomposites for Partial Oxidation of Methane: In-situ Experiments by Dispersive
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2021, 626, 118357. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcata.2021.118357.
[136] Yentekakis, I. V.; Goula, G.; Hatzisymeon, M.; Betsi-Argyropoulou, I.; Botzolaki, G.;
Kousi, K.; Kondarides, D. I.; Taylor, M. J.; Parlett, C. M.; Osatiashtiani, A., et al. Effect of
Support Oxygen Storage Capacity on the Catalytic Performance of Rh Nanoparticles for
CO2 Reforming of Methane. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 243, 490‒501. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2018.10.048.
[137] Al-Fatesh, A. S.; Arafat, Y.; Kasim, S. O.; Ibrahim, A. A.; Abasaeed, A. E.; Fakeeha, A. H.
In Situ Auto-gasification of Coke Deposits over a Novel Ni-Ce/W-Zr Catalyst by
Sequential Generation of Oxygen Vacancies for Remarkably Stable Syngas Production
via CO2-reforming of Methane. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2021, 280, 119445. DOI:
10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119445.
[138] Tang, M.; Xu, L.; Fan, M. Progress in Oxygen Carrier Development of Methane-based
Chemical-looping Reforming: A Review. Appl. Energy. 2015, 151, 143‒156. DOI:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.017.
[139] Qin, L.; Guo, M.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Fan, J. A.; Fan, L. S. Enhanced Methane Conversion
in Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation Systems Using a Copper Doping Modification.
Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2018, 235, 143–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.072.
[140] Shen, Q.; Huang, F.; Tian, M.; Zhu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Effect of Regeneration
Period on the Selectivity of Synthesis Gas of Ba-hexaaluminates in Chemical Looping
Partial Oxidation of Methane. ACS Catal. 2019, 9(1), 722–731. DOI: 10.1021/
acscatal.8b03855.
[141] Bian, Z.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, B.; Hongmanorom, P.; Zhong, W.; Kawi, S. A Review on
Perovskite Catalysts for Reforming of Methane to Hydrogen Production. Renew. Sust.
Energ. Rev. 2020, 134, 110291. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110291.
[142] Bhattar, S.; Abedin, M. A.; Kanitkar, S.; Spivey, J. J. A Review on Dry Reforming of
Methane over Perovskite Derived Catalysts. Catal. Today. 2021, 365, 2–23. DOI:
10.1016/j.cattod.2020.10.041.
[143] Chang, H.; Bjørgum, E.; Mihai, O.; Yang, J.; Lein, H. L.; Grande, T.; Raaen, S.; Zhu, Y. A.;
Holmen, A.; Chen, D. Effects of Oxygen Mobility in La–Fe-based Perovskites on the
Catalytic Activity and Selectivity of Methane Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2020, 10(6),
3707–3719. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05154.
[144] Mihai, O.; Chen, D.; Holmen, A. Chemical Looping Methane Partial Oxidation: The
Effect of the Crystal Size and O Content of LaFeO3. J. Catal. 2012, 293, 175–185. DOI:
10.1016/j.jcat.2012.06.022.
[145] Yang, J.; Bjørgum, E.; Chang, H.; Zhu, K. K.; Sui, Z. J.; Zhou, X. G.; Holmen, A.;
Zhu, Y. A.; Chen, D. On the Ensemble Requirement of Fully Selective Chemical
Looping Methane Partial Oxidation over La-Fe-based Perovskites. Appl. Catal.
B-Environ. 2022, 301, 120788. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120788.
[146] Jiang, B.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, J.; Zhang, H.; Yu, K.; Bian, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Tang, D.
Iron–oxygen Covalency in Perovskites to Dominate Syngas Yield in Chemical Looping
Partial Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9(22), 13008–13018. DOI: 10.1039/
D1TA02103F.
[147] Marek, E.; Hu, W.; Gaultois, M.; Grey, C. P.; Scott, S. A. The Use of Strontium Ferrite in
Chemical Looping Systems. Appl. Energy. 2018, 223, 369–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apenergy.2018.04.090.
56 T. J. SIANG ET AL.
[148] Muñoz-García, A. B.; Bugaris, D. E.; Pavone, M.; Hodges, J. P.; Huq, A.; Chen, F.; Zur
Loye, H. C.; Carter, E. A. Unveiling Structure–property Relationships in Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5
O6-δ, an Electrode Material for Symmetric Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134(15), 6826–6833. DOI: 10.1021/ja300831k.
[149] Ma, Y.; Ma, Y.; Long, G.; Li, J.; Hu, X.; Ye, Z.; Dong, D.; Buckley, C. E.; Dong, D.
Synergistic Promotion Effect of MgO and CeO2 on Nanofibrous Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts for
Methane Partial Oxidation. Fuel. 2019, 258, 116103. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116103.
[150] Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, C.; Ma, L.; Xue, Y.; Guo, J.; Liu, P. Effect of Cobalt Addition on the
Structure and Properties of Ni–MCM-41 for the Partial Oxidation of Methane to Syngas.
RSC Adv. 2019, 9(44), 25508‒25517. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA03534F.
[151] Liu, Y.; Qin, L.; Cheng, Z.; Goetze, J. W.; Kong, F.; Fan, J. A.; Fan, L. S. Near 100% CO
Selectivity in Nanoscaled Iron-based Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Methane
Partial Oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10(1), 1‒6. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13560-0.
[152] Guo, S.; Wang, J.; Ding, C.; Duan, Q.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, K.; Liu, P. Confining Ni
Nanoparticles in Honeycomb-like Silica for Coking and Sintering Resistant Partial
Oxidation of Methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018, 43(13), 6603‒6613. DOI:
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.035.
[153] Ding, C.; Wang, J.; Guo, S.; Ma, Z.; Li, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhang, K. Abundant Hydrogen
Production over Well Dispersed Nickel Nanoparticles Confined in Mesoporous Metal
Oxides in Partial Oxidation of Methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019, 44(57), 30171‒
30184. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.202.
[154] Singha, R. K.; Shukla, A.; Yadav, A.; Konathala, L. S.; Bal, R. Effect of Metal-support
Interaction on Activity and Stability of Ni-CeO2 Catalyst for Partial Oxidation of
Methane. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2017, 202, 473‒488. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2016.09.060.
[155] Ding, C.; Ai, G.; Zhang, K.; Yuan, Q.; Han, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, S. Coking Resistant
Ni/ZrO2@SiO2 Catalyst for the Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas. Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015, 40(21), 6835‒6843. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.094.
[156] Neal, L.; Shafiefarhood, A.; Li, F. Effect of Core and Shell Compositions on MeOx@Lay
Sr1‒yFeO3 Core–shell Redox Catalysts for Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane.
Appl. Energy. 2015, 157, 391‒398. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.028.
[157] Li, L.; He, S.; Song, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ji, W.; Au, C. T. Fine-tunable Ni@porous Silica Core‒
shell Nanocatalysts: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Properties in Partial
Oxidation of Methane to Syngas. J. Catal. 2012, 288, 54‒64. DOI: 10.1016/j.
jcat.2012.01.004.
[158] Dou, Y.; Pang, Y.; Gu, L.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, W.; Feng, X.; Ji, W.; Au, C. T. Core-shell
Structured Ru-Ni@SiO2: Active for Partial Oxidation of Methane with Tunable H2/CO
Ratio. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27(3), 883‒889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.07.011.
[159] Shafiefarhood, A.; Galinsky, N.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, F. Fe2O3@LaxSr1‒xFeO3 Core‒
shell Redox Catalyst for Methane Partial Oxidation. ChemCatChem. 2014, 6(3), 790‒799.
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201301104.
[160] Neal, L. M.; Shafiefarhood, A.; Li, F. Dynamic Methane Partial Oxidation Using a Fe2O3
@ La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-δ Core–shell Redox Catalyst in the Absence of Gaseous Oxygen. ACS
Catal. 2014, 4(10), 3560‒3569. DOI: 10.1021/cs5008415.
[161] Zhao, G.; Chai, R.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y. High-performance Ni-CeAlO3-Al2
O3/FeCrAl-fiber Catalyst for Catalytic Oxy-methane Reforming to Syngas. Fuel. 2019,
58, 116102. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116102.
CATALYSIS REVIEWS 57
[162] Siang, T. J.; Jalil, A. A.; Abdulrahman, A.; Hambali, H. U. Enhanced Carbon Resistance
and Regenerability in Methane Partial Oxidation to Syngas Using Oxygen Vacancy-rich
Fibrous Pd, Ru and Rh/KCC-1 Catalysts. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19(3), 2733‒2742.
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01192-0.
[163] Das, S.; Gupta, R.; Kumar, A.; Shah, M.; Sengupta, M.; Bhandari, S.; Bordoloi, A. Facile
Synthesis of Ruthenium Decorated Zr0.5Ce0.5O2 Nanorods for Catalytic Partial
Oxidation of Methane. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1(6), 2953‒2961. DOI: 10.1021/
acsanm.8b00567.
[164] Melchiori, T.; Di Felice, L.; Mota, N.; Navarro, R. M.; Fierro, J. L. G.; van Sint
Annaland, M.; Gallucci, F. J. A. C. A. G. Methane Partial Oxidation over a LaCr0.85
Ru0.15O3 Catalyst: Characterization, Activity Tests and Kinetic Modeling. Appl. Catal.
A-Gen. 2014, 486, 239‒249. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.08.040.
[165] Bawornruttanaboonya, K.; Laosiripojana, N.; Mujumdar, A. S.; Devahastin, S. Catalytic
Partial Oxidation of CH4 over Bimetallic Ni-Re/Al2O3: Kinetic Determination for
Application in Microreactor. AIChE J. 2018, 64(5), 1691‒1701. DOI: 10.1002/aic.16037.
[166] McCormick, R. L.; Alptekin, G. O.; Herring, A. M.; Ohno, T. R.; Dec, S. F. Methane
Partial Oxidation over Vanadyl Pyrophosphate and the Effect of Fe and Cr Promoters on
Selectivity. J. Catal. 1997, 172(1), 160‒169. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1997.1840.
[167] Alptekin, G. O.; Herring, A. M.; Williamson, D. L.; Ohno, T. R.; McCormick, R. L.
Methane Partial Oxidation by Unsupported and Silica Supported Iron Phosphate
Catalysts: Influence of Reaction Conditions and Co-feeding of Water on Activity and
Selectivity. J. Catal. 1999, 181(1), 104‒112. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1998.2297.
[168] Nguyen, T. H.; Łamacz, A.; Krztoń, A.; Ura, A.; Chałupka, K.; Nowosielska, M.;
Rynkowski, J.; Djéga-Mariadassou, G. Partial Oxidation of Methane over Ni0/La2O3
Bifunctional Catalyst II: Global Kinetics of Methane Total Oxidation, Dry Reforming
and Partial Oxidation. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 165, 389‒398. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2014.10.019.
[169] Nguyen, T. H.; Łamacz, A.; Krztoń, A.; Djéga-Mariadassou, G. Partial Oxidation of
Methane over Ni0/La2O3 Bifunctional Catalyst IV: Simulation of Methane Total
Oxidation, Dry Reforming and Partial Oxidation Using the Quasi-Steady State
Approximation. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2016, 199, 424‒432. DOI: 10.1016/j.
apcatb.2016.06.034.