You are on page 1of 1

[Alvarez vs Guingona ] (1996) constant prices falls below the required annual income of

Twenty Million Pesos (P20,000,000.00).


[J.Hermosisima Jr..]
The SC held that petitioners' asseverations are
TOPIC Income untenable because Internal Revenue Allotments form
SUMMARY (optional for relatively long cases) part of the income of Local Government Units.
DOCTRINE Internal Revenue Allotments form part of
the income of Local Government Units Resolution of the controversy regarding compliance by
the Municipality of Santiago with the aforecited income
Sources of Income of LGU’s: requirement hinges on a correlative and contextual
(1) the right to create and broaden its own explication of the meaning of internal revenue allotments
source of revenue; (IRAs) vis-a-vis the notion of income of a local
government unit and the principles of local autonomy
(2) the right to be allocated a just share in and decentralization underlying the institutionalization
national taxes, such share being in the
and intensified empowerment of the local government
form of internal revenue allotments (IRAs);
system.
and
Understandably, the vesting of duty, responsibility and
(3) the right to be given its equitable share accountability in every local government unit is
in the proceeds of the utilization and accompanied with a provision for reasonably adequate
development of the national wealth, if any,
resources to discharge its powers and effectively carry
within its territorial boundaries.
out its functions. Availment of such resources is
Income is defined in the Local effectuated through the vesting in every local
Government Code to be all revenues government unit of:
and receipts collected or received
(1) the right to create and broaden its own source of
forming the gross accretions of funds
revenue;
of the local government unit
(2) the right to be allocated a just share in national taxes,
I. FACTS such share being in the form of internal revenue
allotments (IRAs); and
RA 7220 converted the Municipality of Santiago into a
component city. The petitioners assail the law for not (3) the right to be given its equitable share in the
originating exclusively from the House of proceeds of the utilization and development of the
Representatives as stated in Article VI of the 1987 national wealth, if any, within its territorial boundaries.
Constitution. For purposes of budget preparation, which budget
Another contention of petitioners is that the Municipality should reflect the estimates of the income of the local
has not yet attained the requirements of a Component government unit, among others, the IRAs and the share
City when the law was passed. in the national wealth utilization proceeds are considered
items of income. This is as it should be, since income is
II. ISSUE defined in the Local Government Code to be all
revenues and receipts collected or received forming
WON the IRA should be included in the computation of
the gross accretions of funds of the local
the income of a Municipality? YES
government unit.
III. RATIONALE
IV. DISPOSITIVE
Petitioners claim that Santiago could not qualify into a
WHEREFORE, the instant petition is DISMISSED for
component city because its average annual income for
lack of merit with costs against petitioners.
the last two (2) consecutive years based on 1991

You might also like