Professional Documents
Culture Documents
312 www.psychopharmacology.com Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology • Volume 39, Number 4, July/August 2019
FIGURE 1. The number of calls involving quetiapine (n = 372)—western France PCC from 2011 to October 2017.
Measures RESULTS
For each selected case, all clinical variables were systemati- The first call concerning quetiapine was in 2007, before
cally recorded and included the following: quetiapine has been marketed in France (2010), and involved poi-
soning in a foreign patient. The second case was in 2011 (Fig. 1).
1. The demographic characteristics of the patient: age, sex, From November 2007 to October 2017, 372 cases of self-
and background. poisoning with quetiapine were identified. Among these cases,
2. The circumstances surrounding the poisoning event: date and 242 involved women and 130 involved men. The average age
time of ingestion and estimated ingested dose (EID) (doses that was 39 years.
the patients admitted to having ingested or the number of tab- Circumstances were known in 367 of 372 cases; 20.2% (74
lets taken as deduced from the empty blisters found near them). cases) of cases involved accidental exposure, with therapeutic
3. The clinical aspects of the poisoning: clinical symptoms (neu- misadventure being the most common cause (11.7% [43 cases]).
rological and psychiatric symptoms, respiratory and cardiovas- A large majority of cases included suicide attempts (79.8%
cular dysfunctions), severity of poisoning, and clinical outcome [293 cases]).
(recovery, death). The medical history was known in 351 of 372 cases. Three
4. The interventional procedures: admission to the intensive care hundred eleven patients had mental health issues (88.4%), and
unit and the need for mechanical ventilation. 61 had alcohol and/or substance use disorders (17.4%) (Table 1).
These cases were divided according to their severity: 75 cases
of null severity (grade 0), 133 cases of mild severity (grade 1), 85
The severity of poisoning was graded using a standardized
cases of moderate severity (grade 2), and 79 cases of high severity
scheme known as the Poison Severity Score (PSS) as follows9:
(grade 3). We listed 5 deaths in this series.
null (grade 0), mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), and severe
In France, quetiapine is available only in XR form. In our se-
and fatal (grade 3) poisoning. The PSS considers the most severe
ries, the dosage was known for 301 of 372 cases: 50 mg XR (77
clinical symptoms (eg, cardiovascular, neurological, metabolic,
cases), 300 mg XR (141 cases), and 400 mg XR (83 cases).
respiratory symptoms) after follow-ups. It enables a qualitative
Neurological and cardiovascular symptoms were often
evaluation of the lethal cases and facilitates the comparison of data.
observed (Table 2).
The most frequently observed neurological symptoms in-
cluded drowsiness (89/372), coma (162/372) with Glasgow coma
Statistical Analysis scale (GCS) score of less than 8 (63/372). The most commonly
observed cardiovascular included tachycardia (108/372), hypo-
Continuous data were summarized by mean ± SD or median tension (46/372), and long QT syndrome (41/372). Other com-
and interquartile range and compared using Mann-Whitney U plications were also noted: severe coma, respiratory depression
tests. Categorical data were summarized using numbers and per- (5/372), rhabdomyolysis (20/372), and aspiration pneumo-
centages and compared using exact Fisher tests. nia (26/372).
The factors influencing the severity of poisoning were stud- In this series, the concentration of quetiapine in the blood
ied through a multivariate logistic regression model. The possible was tested in 28 cases (0.03–7.3 mg/L). Of these 28 samples, 16
explanatory factors were a priori selected based on clinical knowl- showed supratherapeutic concentrations (>1 mg/L10), and 12
edge. The considered factors were age (≥40 years), sex, psychiat- showed toxic doses (>1.8 mg/L10). Of these 12 cases, there were
ric disorders, alcohol use disorders, alcohol consumption, 1 PSS 1, 10 PSS 3, and 1 PSS 4 (death).
benzodiazepine consumption, thymoregulators consumption, Concerning the cases of self-poisoning, 293 of 372 poison-
and antidepressants consumption. ings were voluntary, which makes 79.8%. Of these cases, 69.6%
All the tests were 2-sided with a type I error set at 5%. were women (204), and 91.4% (256) of these patients had a
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.psychopharmacology.com 313
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the Population Who Suffered From Quetiapine Poisoning (n = 372)—Western France PCC From 2007 to
October 2017
TABLE 2. Clinical and Paraclinical Signs of Self-Poisonings With Quetiapine (n = 372)—Western France PCC From 2007 to October 2017
Clinical or Paraclinical Signs* Total PSS 1 (n = 133) PSS 2 (n = 85) PSS 3 (n = 79)
Neurological
Drowsiness 89 57 (43%) 23 (27%) 9 (11%)
GCS score 14–12 60 37 (28%) 20 (23.5%) 3 (4%)
GCS score 11–8 39 36 (42%) 3 (4%)
GCS score <8 63 63 (80%)
Confusion 18 2 (1.5%) 13 (15%) 3 (4%)
Convulsion 14 3 (2%) 3 (3.5%) 8 (10%)
Psychiatric
Anxiety 25 4 (3%) 16 (19%) 5 (6%)
Hallucinations 9 8 (9%) 1 (1%)
Cardiovascular
Tachycardia 108 46 (35%) 40 (47%) 22 (28%)
Cardiac arrest 3 3 (4%)
Hypotension 46 7 (5%) 11 (13%) 28 (35%)
Cardiovascular shock 6 6 (7.5%)
Long QT 41 22 (26%) 19 (22%)
Respiratory
Aspiration pneumonia 26 3 (3.5%) 23 (29%)
Other
Rhabdomyolysis 20 7 (8%) 13 (16%)
*PSS 0 (n = 75): no adverse reaction observed.
314 www.psychopharmacology.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIGURE 2. Coingestion of other drugs for all cases of self-poisoning with quetiapine (n = 293)—western France PCC from 2007 to October 2017.
history of mental illness. Seventy-five of the 79 high severity cases Quetiapine is a relatively new substance. This generation
were linked to a suicide attempt, which was the case in 3 of the 5 causes fewer adverse effects, including extrapyramidal adverse ef-
deaths. The average EID was 4700 mg (minimum 50 mg to maxi- fects.2,11 They are increasingly prescribed to patients.6,8,12 In
mum 36,000 mg; median, 2400 mg), with 65.6% of the cases hav- France, this increase has also been noted.13 The HAS recom-
ing an EID greater than 1500 mg. mends using quetiapine for several conditions (bipolar disorder,
It was observed that, on average of the 2.8 units of quetiapine, schizophrenia, and major depression in combination with other
other substances were coingested in cases of voluntary poisoning. substances). In France, the only form marketed is the XR form
Among these coagents, the most common were benzodiaze- in order to limit the sedating effect. The study shows an increase
pines (56.3%), other antipsychotic agents (39.2%), and antide- in the number of calls (2011: 0.3 cases per 1000 calls involving
pressants (36.9%) (Fig. 2). medication poisoning; 2017: 7.4 cases per 1000 calls). Cases
Then, we decided to study the influence of the form of quetiapine, of poisoning are increasing in the United States,2 as in
the evaluated ingested dose, and the link between the number of coagents France (Table 1).
and the severity of the poisoning. Results are shown in Table 3. The first studies concerning quetiapine qualified it as
In this study, among cases of voluntary consumption, quite harmless.14–16 However, we are now beginning to become
quetiapine intake was associated with at least 2 coagents, and an more cautious.17 In instances of poisoning, the symptoms
EID greater than 1500 mg was strongly linked to an increase in se- found corresponded to an exaggeration of the pharmacological
verity of the symptoms. There is no significant link between the effects.2,18 Although quetiapine is more likely to cause severe
severity of symptoms and the form of quetiapine (dosage). symptoms than other antipsychotics,3,4,19 it seems to be better
Multivariate logistic regressions were calculated for the tolerated by patients and just as effective.1,11
severity of self-poisoning and are shown in Table 4. Concomi- There is currently no specific treatment for quetiapine poison-
tant administration of benzodiazepines and antidepressants ing. Care is therefore based on symptomatic treatment and monitor-
with quetiapine increases the risk of high severity symptoms ing patients (particularly on a neurological and cardiological level).
(odds ratio, 2.478 [confidence interval, 1.3–4.723]; odds ratio, In our study, the most commonly found symptoms included
1.820 [confidence interval, 1.010–3.316]). central nervous system (CNS) depression (drowsiness, coma) and
tachycardia, as seen in many cases.2,4,6,7,20–22 Quetiapine poison-
ing can cause serious medical issues: of the 79 PSS 3, 80% had a
DISCUSSION GCS score of less than 8, 6 went into cardiovascular shock, and
The objective of the study is to describe the quetiapine poi- there were 3 cardiac arrests (Table 2). The depressant effects on
soning observed and to determine if risk factors can influence the CNS could be explained by the quetiapine H1 receptor's antag-
the severity of these cases during voluntary exposure. onist properties.2,4,23 Quetiapine in XR is generally better
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.psychopharmacology.com 315
TABLE 4. The Severity of Poisoning for All Cases of Self-Poisoning With Quetiapine (n = 293) - Western France PCC From 2007 to
October 2017 (5.6% of Missing Values)
95% CI
Odds Ratio Lower Upper P
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/psychopharmacology by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo
tolerated than in IR form. In addition, it causes less drowsiness study, antidepressants were associated with severe poisoning. It
than in IR form in the first hours, especially when treatment has is important to question the danger in combining these substances.
just started.24–26 It could nevertheless be supposed that in the Reluctantly, the HAS has already issued an opinion on the use of
event of poisoning the effects on the CNS would last a long time quetiapine as an adjunctive therapy for major depressive episodes.
because of the extended release. Thus, there is a risk of The results of this study contribute to the argument of the rele-
extended coma, with consequences such as rhabdomyolysis and vance of this use of quetiapine.
aspiration pneumonia. As described in the literature, the majority of poisonings in
In terms of cardiotoxicity, the first symptom observed was our sample were voluntary, that is, 79.8% of cases.4,7,13,21 A his-
tachycardia, followed by hypotension and QT prolongations tory of mental health issues and a history of alcohol dependency
(without torsade de pointes).2,6,15,17,21 Cardiotoxicity, including were identified as risk factors for suicide attempts.30,31
tachycardia, is explained by the affinity of quetiapine for α- In our series, 82% of patients had a history of mental health
adrenergic receptors.15,21 issues. This rate rises to 91% in cases of intentional poisoning.
In our series, we noted a correlation between an EID of This is partly because quetiapine is prescribed for psychiatric dis-
1500 mg or greater (ie, a box of XR 50 mg) and high severity of orders.7,18,32 However, we can warn people about the type of psy-
symptoms. This means that from 1 ingested box the risk to the pa- chiatric care these patients are receiving.
tient is already high, and they would require hospitalization in in- Quetiapine is prescribed in different dosages and different
tensive care; 93.75% (45/48) of high severity cases had an EID of situations. In schizophrenia, quetiapine will be prescribed between
1500 mg or greater. On the one hand, we can suppose that the 400 and 800 mg, whereas in bipolar disorder, the prescription
higher the dose, the higher the severity, unlike Hunfeld et al,7 will not exceed 600 mg to prevent a thymic episode and mostly
who do not observe any relationship here. On the other hand, we around 300 mg in case of depressive episode. The great interest
found neither a link between the EID and the form of quetiapine of this treatment is that, like an antipsychotic, it has an action
(50 mg vs 300 or 400 mg) nor a correlation between the dosage against delusion and moreover an antidepressive effect, unlike
and the severity of the cases. In other words, the study did not other antipsychotic drugs. In our study, the risk increased when
show a relation between the prescribed form and the severity of quetiapine was associated with other psychotropic drugs, in par-
symptoms. The concentration of quetiapine in the blood is not ticular benzodiazepines and antidepressants. The coprescription
usually measured in toxicology, although it has therapeutic impli- is very usual in psychiatric disorders, and it should be interest-
cations. In our series, a few tests were performed. However, we do ing to evaluate the pertinence of each prescription, including
not have enough data to assess whether serum concentration cor- blood concentration to optimize the positive effect of each treat-
relates with severity. The dosage is of diagnostic and postmortem ment rather than adding new treatment. Most of the acute poison-
interest (to determine the cause of death).27 An overdose of ing was in a suicidal condition. This is particularly important to
quetiapine causes death,4,28 as a result of interactions between adjust the prescription and the monitoring of suicidal ideas.33 In
coingested agents.17,28 France, the delivery of treatment is monthly. So, the more different
In our study, we noted a correlation between voluntary poi- kind of treatment is prescribed, the more pills are available
soning with at least 2 coagents and degrees of severity. Moreover, at home.
deaths due to the coingestion of other substances were observed Quetiapine overdose may lead to severe poisoning. Physi-
(from 2 to 6 molecules) in our study.14 We observed a significant cians should be particularly attentive as there is no specific treat-
correlation between severity, benzodiazepine, and related intake. ment for this. It is important to monitor the symptoms, particularly
Benzodiazepines are often coprescribed to psychiatric patients, par- with atypical antipsychotics, even though they are considered
ticularly for their anxiolytic and sedative properties. They were also safer than the first generation.21 Estimated ingested dose and
found to be present in several other studies on quetiapine.7,13,29 The coagents can serve as predictors of severity, particularly when
risk of poisoning increases for a patient taking quetiapine and benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and other psychotropic drugs
benzodiazepine. Indeed, CNS depression is increased because are present. It is therefore important that care staffs are aware of
quetiapine's effect on the CNS increases with the action of ben- coprescribed/coingested substances.
zodiazepines. In some cases, CNS depression is also increased Because of the particular profile of the patients on
by an interaction with cytochromes.7 Similarly, in several other quetiapine, it seems important to be vigilant with regard to the
cases, quetiapine is combined with other antidepressants. In our dosages administered and the therapeutic schemes proposed to
316 www.psychopharmacology.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
the patients. The recommendations err on the side of caution, es- 15. Tan HH, Hoppe J, Heard K. A systematic review of cardiovascular effects
pecially when used in cases of major depression, associated with after atypical antipsychotic medication overdose. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;
other therapies. 27:607–616.
16. Mattoo S, Shah R, Rajagopal R, et al. Quetiapine: relatively safe in
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE INFORMATION overdose? Indian J Psychiatry. 2009;51:139.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/psychopharmacology by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.psychopharmacology.com 317