Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER-AT-A-GLANCE GRID
Chapter Outline Instructor’s Resources Multimedia Resources
5.1 Piaget’s Learning Objectives 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 Assimilation and
Theory of Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Reflection Accommodation video
Sensorimotor Activities (2:29)
Development Pair and Share: Examples of the Infant as Piaget’s Stages of
the Little Scientist Cognitive
Research Project: Who Was Piaget? Development video
Writing Assignment: Test Out Piaget’s Tasks (6:17)
with an Infant Sensorimotor Substages
Research Activity: Piagetian Research video (7:25)
Article A not B Search Error
video (1:26)
Violation of Expectation
Methods video (2:34)
Deferred Imitation video
(2:10)
Piaget on Piaget video
(42:00)
84
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
5.2 Specific Learning Objectives 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7 Core Knowledge of
Aspects of Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Reflection Prosocial Behavior?
Cognitive Activity video (2:32)
Development Application Activity: Investigate the Work of Core Knowledge:
Dr. Carolyn Rovee-Collier; Category Interview with
Formation and Gender-Typed Color Researcher Dr.
Preferences; Research Challenges in Elizabeth Spelke
Measuring Infant Intelligence; Find a video (3:39)
Child’s Toy that Promotes Cognitive Infant Episodic Memory
Development video (3:37)
Shared Writing: Improving Child Care in the Infant Looking Time
United States Habituation video
Observing the Dynamic Child 5.2: Attention (8:25)
and Memory Bayley Scales of Infant
Guest Speaker: Assessment Professional Development video
Who Administers the Bayley Scales of (4:03)
Infant Development; Child Care Worker or Bayley Scales of Infant
Professor of Early Childhood Education Development
Administration video
(1:22)
Observing the Dynamic
Child 5.2: Attention
and Memory video
(4:15)
5.3 Language Learning Objectives 5.8, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, Infant Language
Development 5.12, 5.13, 5.14 Research Procedures
Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Reflection video (12:20)
Activities Infant Speech
Pair and Share: Infant Language; First Perception video
Words and Language Errors; Compare (5:18)
and Contrast Behavioral Views with Joint Attention video
Chomsky’s View of Language (1:12)
Development Babbling Babies video
Application Activity: Research Bilingualism in (2:08)
Children; Observe Toddler Speech Thinking Like a Speech-
Research Assignment: Exposure to Language Pathologist:
Language in Utero Working with
Observing the Dynamic Child 5.3: Twins Language Delays
Playing at a Table video (1:42)
Thinking About the Whole Child: My Virtual Toddler Speech video
Child from Birth to 30 Months (2:30)
Writing Assignment: Design an Intervention Steven Pinker on
Program to Promote Language Language video (6:04)
Development Noam Chomsky and
Guest Speaker: Speech Language Language
Pathologist Development video
The Dynamic Child in the Classroom: (8:28)
Behavior and Problem-Solving Skills
85
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Do Babies Learn from
Baby Media? video
(6:19)
Observing the Dynamic
Child 5.3: Twins
Playing at a Table
video (3:50)
The Dynamic Child in
the Classroom:
Behavior and
Problem-Solving Skills
video (5:03)
86
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
LO 5.6 Explain how children develop categorization skills.
Relationship of Infant Information Processing to Later Intelligence
LO 5.7 Explain which information processing skills may be stable over time and
predictive of later IQ scores.
Shared Writing: Improving Child Care in the United States
Observing the Dynamic Child 5.2: Attention and Memory
5.3 Language Development
The Challenge of Understanding Language Development
LO 5.8 Identify the major milestones of language development.
Perceiving Language in the First Year
LO 5.9 Explain how infants perceive basic speech sounds and words embedded
within sentences in the first year.
Perceiving Speech Sounds
Segmentation of Speech into Words
Producing Speech and Communicating Socially
LO 5.10 Explain how the ability to communicate develops in the first year.
Speech Production
Early Social Communication
Learning Word Meanings
LO 5.11 Explain how children develop an understanding of word meanings.
Comprehending Words
The Nature of Early Words
Errors in Word Usage
Using Syntax
LO 5.12 Describe how infants develop the grammar of their native language.
Biological Bases of Language
LO 5.13 Explain how the brain processes language.
Environmental Influences on Language
LO 5.14 Explain how the environment contributes to language development.
Language Deprivation
Infant-Directed Speech
Is There a Sensitive Period for Learning Languages?
Observing the Dynamic Child 5.3: Twins Playing at a Table
Thinking About the Whole Child: My Virtual Child from Birth to 30 Months (Group
Activity)
The Dynamic Child in the Classroom: Behavior and Problem-Solving Skills
LESSON PLANS
Module 5.1 Piaget’s Theory of Sensorimotor Development
Introduction/hook to stimulate students’ interest (5 minutes)
Organizing theme: How does Piaget’s theory explain cognitive development?
Link the introduction’s discussion of Piaget’s observations of his daughter and her problem
solving. Ask students if they have witnessed something like this in observing problem-solving
skills in young children.
Inform students that we will explore the different ways that infants develop cognitively.
Integrating the Information: Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Reflection Activity
(5 minutes): In this section, students will continue raising their virtual child from birth to 30
months. Ask students to think about the ways in which specific aspects of cognitive
87
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
development (language, problem solving, memory) impact their virtual child’s overall
development. Ask students to consider how the information covered in Chapter 4 (physical
development, including the brain and motor skills) and the upcoming information in Chapter 6
(social and emotional development) relate to cognitive development.
LO 5.1 Lecture Notes: Explain the processes involved in cognitive development, according
to Piaget.
Piaget viewed the child as an active participant (little scientist) in exploring the world. Children
develop schemes, or organized networks of knowledge, about people, places, and events.
In the sensorimotor stage of development, the child coordinates sensory and motor
information. The infant forms mental representations, or internalized mental schemes that
last over time.
Developmental change occurs through cognitive equilibrium, in which the infant is
motivated to act on or understand the world successfully. Cognitive equilibrium occurs
through adaptation and organization.
In adaptation, the infant achieves cognitive equilibrium through modification of schemes in
repetitive interaction with the environment. Adaptation occurs through assimilation and
accommodation. Assimilation involves interpreting experience in terms of the existing
schemes, and accommodation involves interpreting experience by modifying existing
schemes. (Note: Students often have difficulty with the difference between assimilation and
accommodation. To help students with these concepts, provide the following strategy:
Assimilation has two s’s, which can stand for “same scheme.” Accommodation has the letter
c, which can stand for “change scheme”).
Organization occurs when schemes are linked to form more complex mental structures.
LO 5.2 Lecture Notes: Explain how the child’s problem-solving ability changes across
Piaget’s six sensorimotor substages, including object permanence.
Piaget proposed that cognitive development in the first two years happens in six progressive
substages, and this progression happens in all infants in normal human environments.
In substage one, infants use their reflexive capabilities rigidly—they do not alter schemes
much. In substages two and three, infants begin to accommodate the environment by
88
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
modifying schemes related to their own bodies (primary circular reactions) and other people
or external objects (secondary circular reactions).
Substage four is characterized by goal-directed behavior, in which the infant carries out two
or more schemes in succession to achieve a goal. Object permanence, a type of goal-
directed behavior, requires that the infant combine two schemes to achieve an end. In this
substage, infants commit the A-not-B search error, in which they will look for an object in its
original place, even if they witnessed the object being moved to another location. At this
substage, Piaget proposed that infants do not yet have complete understanding of object
permanence.
In substage five, infants develop tertiary circular reactions, in which they intentionally vary
schemes to solve problems. In substage six, infants have fully developed mental schemes
and mentally work out problems instead of relying on trial-and-error problem solving. Infants
now fully understand object permanence and can engage in deferred imitation, imitation of
actions they observed in the past.
Integrating the Information: Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Journal Prompt
5.1 (5 minutes): Find examples of your child’s behavior that fit each of Piaget’s sensorimotor
stages. Is your child’s behavior on track based on the age ranges just presented? (This may be
used as an in-class writing assignment or a group discussion. For best results, prime students
to have answers to these journal prompts ready for class discussion.)
LO 5.3 Lecture Notes: Explain how subsequent studies have modified Piaget’s claims about
object permanence and imitation.
Researchers challenged Piaget’s sensorimotor theory. First, object permanence appears to
emerge earlier than Piaget thought. Secondly, researchers outline problems in Piaget’s
approach to understanding development (Cohen & Cashon, 2006; Goswami, 2008).
In challenging object permanence, many researchers have used the violation of expectation
method to show that infants younger than 8 to 12 months demonstrate this skill. The basic
89
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
premise is that infants (like adults) look longer at impossible events compared with possible
events.
If tested using Piaget’s original framework, infants will not search for an object under a cover
until 8 to 9 months, and they will make the A-not-B search error around 12 months.
Researchers are not in agreement as to why this finding exists. Possible explanations include
growth of working memory and long-term memory for events, planning and executing
responses, and inhibiting responses that worked previously (all executive functioning
capabilities governed by prefrontal cortex brain development).
Piaget also underestimated infants’ ability to imitate, proposing that this does not develop until
approximately 18 months. However, current research shows that infants much younger can
demonstrate deferred imitation (Barr, Marrot & Rovee-Collier, 2003; Meltzoff, 1988a; Meltzoff,
1988b).
90
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Remind students of the basic tenets of evolutionary theory (covered in Chapter 1). Inform
them that both evolutionary theory and Piaget’s theory represent the intellectual origin of core
knowledge theories.
LO 5.4 Lecture Notes: Explain what infants might understand about numbers.
Core knowledge systems refer to innate systems that allow infants to understand the world
with minimal experience. Examples include innate understanding of number systems (up to
three objects) and comparison of large arrays (e.g., infants at 6 months can distinguish
between arrays of eight and 16 dots, but not between eight and 12 dots; Figure 5.3).
Critics of the core knowledge approach state that the reliance on habituation and violation of
expectation methods may only indicate a perceptual preference, as opposed to an enduring
mental representation (Cohen & Cashon, 2006; Kagan, 2008).
Video Link: Core Knowledge: Interview with Researcher Dr. Elizabeth Spelke
(3:39)
https://youtu.be/HnOllgd-8Ao
In this video, Dr. Spelke describes her research and the core knowledge theory of cognitive
development.
LO 5.5 Lecture Notes: Explain how attention and memory abilities develop in the first 2
years.
The Goldilocks principle (Kidd, Piantadosi, & Aslin, 2012) states that infants attend to
environmental stimulation that has a medium level of complexity. In attending to medium
complexity stimuli, infants get the most return for their cognitive effort. Infants also become
better at selecting and controlling attention in the first year.
Infants increase their speed of encoding new information to memory during the first 2 years,
in which the infant increases the speed of habituation to a new stimulus.
As demonstrated in experiments by Rovee-Collier and colleagues (1999; 2010), infants
develop memory for operant-conditioned responses throughout infancy (Figure 5.5). This
demonstrates implicit memory, the unconscious learning of a response.
Explicit memory, the conscious, deliberate recall of events or experiences, can be measured
through deferred imitation. Infants show gradual improvements in explicit memory over time,
likely due to changes in brain structures associated with memory (medial temporal lobes,
prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus).
Integrating the Information: Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Journal Prompt
5.2 (5 minutes): Earlier, you thought about changes in your virtual infant’s cognitive skills in
terms of Piaget’s theory. How might these changes in your child’s behavior be due to the
development of attention and memory? (This may be used as an in-class writing assignment or
a group discussion. For best results, prime students to have answers to these journal prompts
ready for class discussion.)
91
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Application Activity: Investigate the Work of Dr. Carolyn Rovee-Collier
Dr. Rovee-Collier made significant contributions to studying infant implicit memory. Have
students investigate her research and its main findings. A good place to start is the following
article:
Rovee-Collier, C. (1999). The development of infant memory. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 8, 80–85.
https://faculty.washington.edu/sommej/Rovee-Collier1999.pdf
This may be used as an in-class writing assignment or class discussion.
LO 5.7 Lecture Notes: Explain which information processing skills may be stable over time
and predictive of later IQ scores.
The speed with which infants habituate to new stimuli appears related to later intelligence and
achievement (reading and math) scores (Fagan, Holland, & Weaver, 2007; Kavsek, 2004).
92
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Information processing capabilities in infancy, including memory, processing speed, attention,
and representational competence, correlate with the same skills during toddler years and at
11 years of age (Table 5.1; Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2011; Rose, Feldman, Jankowski,
& Van Rossem, 2012).
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development, the most commonly used measure of infant
development, includes measures of infant attention, habituation, and visual memory, in
addition to measures of imitation, problem solving, and language skills (Albers & Grieve,
2007; Bayley, 2006; Berger, Hopkins, Bae, Hella, & Strickland, 2010).
93
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
a. *Revel, the older child, tries to duplicate the experimenter’s turning and dropping of
the toy
b. Lily Rose imitates the sound her mother makes after giving her the toy
c. Lily Rose flicks some of the same little levers that her mother flicked on the complex
toy
d. Revel imitates exactly how his mother manipulated the complex toy
3. Which of the following might explain Revel’s greater interest in the more complex toy
and Lily Rose’s greater interest in the rings?
a. Revel has more advanced fine motor skills and can more successfully manipulate
the complex toy.
b. Revel has more advanced language, so the adults can explain how to play with the
toy.
c. The complex toy is only of moderate complexity for Revel, but it is of high complexity
for Lily Rose, and hence their attention to the toy varies.
d. *Both a and c are true.
To encourage additional critical thinking following the Observing the Dynamic Child video,
ask students to address this prompt:
You are invited to a birthday party for your 2-year-old nephew. You have little experience
with toddlers and decide to go to the local toy store to buy the perfect gift. As you review
the toy selection, you notice the toys include a notation of appropriate ages for the toy.
You eye a toy with the range 36–48 months clearly printed on the package. Although
your nephew is only 2, you consider how you might help him accelerate his
development. Of course, you think he is a very exceptional child, so you purchase the
toy marked 36–48 months. How might this toy help or hinder your nephew’s
development relative to attention and memory? Are the age range suggestions relevant?
94
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
toy’s claims to aspects of brain development presented in Chapter 4. This may be used as
an in-class writing assignment or class discussion.
LO 5.9 Lecture Notes: Explain how infants perceive basic speech sounds and words
embedded within sentences in the first year.
During the first 12 months, infants develop the ability to perceive two aspects of language:
units of sounds and words embedded in sentences.
By two days of age, infants prefer listening to their native language rather than other
languages and can distinguish between languages they have never heard before, based on
their rhythmical characteristics (Gervain & Mehler, 2010).
Young infants have the ability to distinguish among nearly all sounds found in the world’s
languages (Eimas, Siqueland, & Jusczyk, Vigorito, 1971; Gervain & Mehler, 2010). The
smallest of these sounds is the phoneme, or the smallest meaningful unit of sound in a
language. Infants gradually increase ability to distinguish phonemes in their native languages
over the first year, while decreasing ability to distinguish phonemes in foreign languages (Kuhl
et al., 2006; Werker & Tees, 1984).
Much of the decline in ability to distinguish phonemes in foreign languages applies to
monolingual babies; bilingual infants do not show the same decline in the first year. However,
the ability to distinguish phonemes in foreign languages re-appears around 2 years for
monolingual infants (MacWhinney, 2015; Werker, 1995).
95
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
To understand language, infants must segment speech into words. Infants do this through
identifying repetitive sounds that appear together and through intonation and stress in
language. Parents also facilitate this process by using simple language to communicate with
infants.
LO 5.10 Lecture Notes: Explain how the ability to communicate develops in the first year.
Infant attempts to communicate verbally move from crying to cooing in the first 3 months. By 6
months, infants make repetitive consonant-vowel combinations through babbling. Infants
increasingly babble in patterns that resemble their native language during the first year.
Infant-directed speech (IDS) helps infants learn the basics of language and conversation.
IDS has shorter sentences, more clearly articulated words, repeated words and phrases,
higher pitch, more variable pitch, imitation of infants’ speech by parents, and exaggerated
stress (Sachs, 2009; Thiessen, Hill, & Saffran, 2005). The use of IDS by parents is associated
with better learning of phoneme categories and a larger vocabulary at age 12 months
(Altvater-Mackensen & Grossman, 2015).
Joint attention, in which adults and infants focus on the same thing, is usually present by 9
months. Joint attention reflects the infant’s understanding that others have goals and
objectives. Joint attention relates to language development in that mothers who have frequent
bouts of joint attention with their infants and who attract the infants’ attention to objects and
say the names of objects tend to have infants who produce meaningful gestures and acquire
new vocabulary words at an earlier age (Brooks & Meltzoff, 2008; Carpenter, Nagel, &
Tomasello, 1998).
96
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
This video shows twin boys babbling to one another. After showing the video, have students
examine the social function of communication—what might the boys in the video want to
communicate? How do they engage one another in “conversation”? This may be used as an in-
class writing assignment or class discussion.
Integrating the Information: Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Journal Prompt
5.3a (5 minutes): Assume that if your virtual child actually could hear you, you would be
speaking to the child in infant-directed speech. How might this type of speech help your child
learn how to pronounce words as well as to learn the meanings of words? (This may be used as
an in-class writing assignment or a group discussion. For best results, prime students to have
answers to these journal prompts ready for class discussion.)
LO 5.11 Lecture Notes: Explain how children develop an understanding of word meanings.
Infants can understand many more words than they can produce in the first year (Fenson et
al., 1994).
The first words that infants produce are in reference to important people or objects in their
environment (Table 5.2). Once infants begin to speak, they add words slowly, speaking about
50 words by 18 months (Fenson et al., 1994).
In learning language during the first 2 ½ years, children make common errors:
1. Overextension: extend the adult meaning of a word too far
2. Underextension: using a word in more limited context than the adult meaning
Children are more likely to overextend in production of speech than in comprehension.
Underextensions may be due to retrieval problems, in that the child has only heard a word
once or twice, or the child does not know the full range of category members to which the
word extends (Pan & Uccelli, 2009).
LO 5.12 Lecture Notes: Describe how infants develop the grammar of their native language.
Infants use holophrases, single-word utterances that stand for an entire thought or variety of
meanings.
97
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
In telegraphic speech (used when vocabulary reaches 150 to 200 words), children use only
the most essential, high-impact words and string together two- to three-word utterances.
Telegraphic speech lacks grammatical inflections, such as the plural, past tense, and present
progressive.
Children understand more complex syntactic structures and semantic relationships than they
can express (Golinkoff & Hirsh-Pasek, 1995; MacWhinney, 2015).
Integrating the Information: Thinking About Your Virtual Child: Journal Prompt
5.3b (5 minutes): Is your child behind, on track, or ahead of schedule in language development
by 18 months of age? Refer back to the Language Development of Milestones timeline. Is this
something you should be concerned about, and what, if anything, can you do? (This may be
used as an in-class writing assignment or a group discussion. For best results, prime students
to have answers to these journal prompts ready for class discussion.)
Pair and Share: Compare and Contrast Behavioral Views with Chomsky’s View of
Language Development
Have each student pair with another student to compare and contrast behavioral views with
Chomsky’s view of language development. What are the basic premises of each approach?
What processes in learning language does each theory account for best?
98
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Dr. Steven Pinker, a cognitive psychologist who researches language, describes the evolution
of language. Pinker discusses Chomsky’s theory of language and the mistakes that children
make in learning language.
LO 5.14 Lecture Notes: Explain how the environment contributes to language development.
Studies of language deprivation, infant-directed speech, and testing the sensitive period
hypothesis contribute to understanding of how the environment influences language
development.
Language deprivation studies examine the case of Genie. Genie, severely maltreated
between ages 2 and 13, never developed syntax beyond the level of the average 2-year-old
child (Curtiss, Fromkin, Krashen, Rigler, & Rigler, 1974).
Additional evidence of deprivation comes from deaf infants whose parents did not expose
them to sign language. These infants did not develop adequate oral language skills even
though they developed their own version of sign language, home sign (Goldin-Meadow &
Feldman, 1977; Goldin-Meadow & Mylander, 1984, 1990). In home sign, infants strung
together two or three signs, similar to telegraphic speech. However, development stalled after
reaching the telegraphic speech stage (Goldin-Meadow, Mylander, & Franklin, 2007).
Studies of infant-directed speech recasts support the role of the environment in language
development. Infants who had their sentences corrected (recast) showed both immediate and
long-term improvements in grammatical use (Saxton, 2000; Saxton, Backley, & Gallaway,
2003; Saxton, Kulcsar, Marshall, & Rupra, 1998).
Hart and Risley (1995; 1999) showed that infants in lower socioeconomic status (SES) homes
hear less language spoken, and this correlates with smaller vocabularies at age 3 compared
with middle and upper SES peers.
Video programs designed to teach children language (Baby Einstein) do not appear overly
successful; language appears to be learned best through social interaction.
Some theorists believe that the brain mechanisms for acquiring syntax may have a more
limited period of pruning and consolidation, whereas those for vocabulary may remain plastic
throughout the life span (Berko-Gleason, 2009). Individuals who learn sign language in
adolescence or adulthood are less likely to use subtle grammatical features compared with
individuals who learn sign language in childhood (Newport, 1990). For individuals who speak
English as a second language, researchers found decreases in self-rated language
competency as the age of immigration to the United States increased, from infancy to
adulthood (Hakuta, Bialystok, & Wiley, 2003).
99
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
their perspective on baby media changed since Chapter 4? This may be used as an in-class
writing assignment or class discussion.
To encourage additional critical thinking following the Observing the Dynamic Child video,
the video can be used as part of the following in-class activity:
Hand out a transcript of what the children say and have students work in teams to
analyze what is and is not present in the twins’ utterances. They should be able to
identify features of telegraphic speech. They can also work from a list of the semantic
relations in Table 5.3 and identify which ones they hear in the twins’ language. To
capture some of the difficulty in studying spontaneous speech in infants, you can run the
video once to see how well they do on the assignment, and then run it again with the
transcript.
Thinking About the Whole Child: My Virtual Child from Birth to 30 Months
This is designed for small group discussions. Break students into groups of three or four and
prompt them to compare their virtual child experiences. Students should compare virtual child
experiences for the period from birth to 24 months, also including the developmental evaluations
at 19 and 30 months. The following questions are suggestions to get students started in the
discussion of virtual children:
1. Describe and give examples of changes in your child’s exploratory or problem-solving
behavior or memory from 3 through 24 months in terms of Piaget’s theory and information
processing/cognitive neuroscience theories. Compare your child’s development to that of
others and discuss why differences might exist.
100
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
2. Compare your child’s communication and language development at 12, 18, and 24 months
of age to that of other children. What factors might explain differences within the group in
rate of development?
101
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Have students compare and contrast Piaget’s theory with core knowledge and information
processing approaches to cognitive development. How do the frameworks differ? What
research supports each? Students may present findings in a four- to five-page paper. This may
also be used as an in-class writing assignment or class discussion.
102
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Invite an Infant or Toddler to Class to Demonstrate Language Development
Invite an infant or toddler to class to demonstrate typical language development during this
period. Of course, the primary caregiver should accompany the child. Ask the caregiver to
engage the child in conversation. Ask students to note the features of the conversation and the
features of the language the child uses. Ask the caregiver about the child’s typical language
patterns. What are the most common words the child uses? Does the child use holophrases?
Does the caregiver recast the child’s speech? Ask students to come prepared with at least two
questions for the caregiver.
Class Field Trip: Visit a Child Care Center to Observe Cognitive Development
If your campus has a child care or child development center, arrange a field trip to observe child
cognitive development. While at the center, ask students to observe children as they
demonstrate aspects of cognitive development, including memory, problem solving, and
language skills. Have students link their observations to the information presented in the text.
This may be used as an in-class writing assignment or class discussion. Suggestions about
what to look for during an observation are provided in Thinking About the Whole Child:
Observing Cognitive Development in Infants.
Jankovsky, E. (2013, Mar. 4). Discoveries of infancy—Cognitive development and learning part
1. [Video file.] Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/1UgID3g-YQE.
Jankovsky, E. (2013, Mar. 4). Discoveries of infancy—Cognitive development and learning part
2. [Video file.] Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jOO6tZAijA.
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience
strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152.
103
Copyright © 2017 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.