760
REPUBLIC
of work: Philosophie daloeve
utor Pao (27-347 B.C)
Time: Fh cetry B.C
Locale: The Pires, Greece
Fit transcribed: Fourth century B.C
“The Republic is Plato's masterpiece, not only because
it presents fascinating defense ofthe author's conceP-
tion of the ideal state but also because it gives us the
‘most sustained and convincing portrait of Socrates 38
tritial and ereative philosopher. Other dialogues, such
as the Phaedo and the Apology, may be superior as stud-
ies of the personality and character of Socrates, ‘but the
Republic is unexcelled as an exhibition of the famed
Socratic method being brought to bear on such questions
as "What is justice?” and "What kind of state would be
ost just?”
"Ahough the constructive arguments of this dialogue
come from the mouth of Socrates, it is suf to assume
that much of the philosophy is Platonic in origin, AS a
rough reading rule, we may say that the method is Socr-
ti, but the content is provided by Pato himsel, Among
the ideas which are presented and defended inte Repub-
lic are the Platonic theory of Foems—the formal proto-
types of al things, objective o inellectual—the Platonic
conception ofthe nature and obligations of the philoso-
per, and the Patone theory and eiticism of poetry. But
{he central concern of the authors wih the idea of justice
in man andthe state, The pursuit of this idea makes the
Republi the longest of the dialogues withthe exception
ofthe Laws.
“The diloguc is discussion between Socrates and var-
ious fiends while they ate in the Piraeus for festival.
The discussion of justice is provoked by a remark made
by an old man, Cephalus othe effet thatthe principal
advantage of being wealthy is that man near death is
able to repay what he owes tothe gods and men, and is
thereby able tobe jus inthe hope of achieving happy
afterlife. Socrates objects to this conception of justice,
‘mainaining that whether a person shoul return what he
has received depends on the circumstances. For example
4 man who has received dangerous weapons from his
friends while sane should no, if he is just, return those
weapons if his fiend while mad demands them.
Tolemarchus amends the idea and dec
{ast help our fin hi
no just man would ever sanction makin
food and bad to the bad
“Thrasymachus then proposes the theory tht
Caen oe meer tbe eange et
Js that justice is relative tothe law, and the lay
ty the stronger party according this interes
ta, Soerates maneuvers Thrasymachus ing sya
Sometimes rulers make mistakes. Ithis isso, geet
times the law is sesns ther iterest; when ee
inst he interests ofthe stonger party, it rig
‘vats mt to the interest ofthe stronger pany oe
The secret ofthe Soca method i ee ay
analysis ofthis argument. The term “imeres™ or yt
interest of” is ambiguous, sometimes meaning yi
nani interested in, what he Wants, and at oh nek
that e could want i he were ot in eto, as wines
say, "But although you want tit snot relly trae
interest to have it” Socrates adroit shits from os oe
of the expression to the other 50 that Thasyrae
apparently contradicts himself. In ths indret way Sc
tales makesitclearbothto the “victim” andiothe oniseg
thatthe proponent ofthe claim—in this cae, Thay
tmachus—has not cleared it of all possibility of mse
interpretation,
Socrates then goes on to say that justice must be n.
ative to the needs of those who are served. net ty
desires of those who serve them. The phsi,
example s physician, must make the eath ofthe pea
his primary concer if he is to be jas.
Socrates suggests that their understanding of se
would be clanfie if they were to considera cone
case, say the state: if by discussion they could come b
understand what a state must be in order tobe jo,
might be possible to generalize and to arrive at ana
of justice isl.
Beginning with an account of what a state would ne
to be in order to fulfil its functions a a sate, Sos
then proceeds to develop the notion of an del stb
asking what the rclations of the various groups feiss
to each ther should be
Every state needs thre clases of etzens: he Gant
‘ans, who rule and advise the rest; the Auxiliaries. "b?
provide military protection forthe state; andthe Was
he husbandmen and other providers of food, csi
ad such useful materials.
i fondepic
x state these three classes of citizens function
12 Hoh dong 8 OWN proper busines without
sett ith the 25 ofthe oer classes
iene his Ha the individ person, Socrates
‘ofa ust atone who Ves Co each of hs
es oper sk eltng them o each eter
aus a. Justa the state has three distinct,
a ma the governing the defending andthe pvc
eto the individual person bas three corre:
ig bode tjements the rational, the spirited, and the
in ty the sisted element Plato means the pa.
2 pest of mas alr, hs propensity tanger or
anonal emotions. He so uses the term anger that
as fr hat we cll Fhtous indignation, the
alba defense ofresson against desire. The rational
sa the dsceoing and calculating ce of man’s
net itis what enables man o be wise and ju-
cco mn i a
ie same tings in preference others
se guman, theo, is one who Kees each ofthe thre
cahbns of is mature doings proper work with the
deme clement in command. A petson is brave, sys
if his spirited clement remains always in the
Soar ieason. He is wise ifheis governed by eason,
ceo takes ito account the welfare ofthe entire
nd eis temperate if is spirit and appetive work
rpms under the guidance of reason.
ummager 10 discover those citizens best suited to be
Garam, Socrates proposed that the ideal tate educate
Gof eiizens in music and gymnastics, continually
a1 in them to decide upon the sort of occupation for
at they would best be fitted. He also arpucs that the
Tabane and Auxiliaries should have no private prop-
Seeead that they each should share a community of
tries and children
Mece obvious communal features of the ideal state
ated many critics to dismiss Plato's conception as
‘ev lable Bu its well to remember that inthe dia-
Tout Soerts tells is listeners that hei not concerned
eek the practicality of his stat; the conception ofthe
ans constructed merely to bring out the nature of
sie
Jive considering the education of the Guardians, Soc-
rates buds the conception of the philosopher asthe tue
‘fsterat or rational man the ieal ruler forthe teal
Se The philsopher is a over of wisdom, and he alone
nage o keep appetite and spirit in harmony with rea-
ton Consequently the Guardians ofthe state should be
educated a8 philosophers, supplementing ther taining
‘tarihmti, geomet, sttonomy, and music with raining
inthe pilosophic sil of dialectic. But the prospective
Guardans should not be allowed to undertake pilo-
sophicedcation until they are old enough to take it er-
tna
761
ously, not a
mai it as mere amusement. After his philosophic
ERNE the rspetve Guardian should take prin the
pola! ths ime 50 that at ity he can assume
political power wit ome knowledge ofthe acta ma
» sth which he hl concer,
connection with his discussion of the philosopher,
Socrates intoduced his famous myth of the cave. Men
tr lke prisoners ina cave that aces ava from the Hight
Unable to se themselves or anyone else beease he ae
shackled they observe only the shadows of hings o he
in front of them, not realizing thatthe reality is
something qui different from the shadows. The philos-
fers es man who feaves the ae meso kow
ngs they really are, and returns reluctantly to help
bf eri ‘men who think that shadows ca up the
‘The philosopher comes to know reality through astudy
ofthe Forms or Ideas of particular things. The world of
our experiences like the world of shadows, but the world
of Ideas isthe trv realty. For every class of objets,
Such as beds (Socrates' example), there isan Ide-bed,
4 form shared by al particular beds, The man who stud-
ies only the individual beds made by carpenters, or only
the pictures of beds made by artists, knows only copies
of reality (and, in the ease ofthe imitative artist, only
copies of copies; but the philosopher, making the effort
to lear the Idea itself, comes closer to reality
Socrates objects to poetry and to art whenever they
arcimitative, which they usually are. Although he admits
that some poetry ean be inspiring in the patriot raining
of the Guardians, be stresses the point that imitative art
is corrupting because itis misleading. Physical things,
afterall, are merely copies ofthe Forms, the Ideas; hence
they are one step removed from reality. But works of art
are copies of piysical things; hence they ae at least two
steps removed from lity. Furthermore, the ats pats
only a single aspect of a thing: hence strictly speaking,
arts thre steps removed from aly Ison this account,
as well as because ofthe immoral effect of the poetic
style ofall but the most noble poets, tht Socrates ree-
‘ommends that imitative poets be banned from the sate.
"The Republic closes with Socrates’ reaffirmation of
his conviction that ony the ast man is truly happy, for
only he harmonizes reason, appetite. and spirit by loving
‘wisdom and the Form of the Good. Te souls immoral,
hheargues, because the sou’ llnes i injustice; yt injus-
tice self oes not destroy a sou. Since the soul cannot
be destroyed by any illness other than its own, it must
be immortal, Socrates concludes by using a myth about
Iie afer death fo show thatthe jut and wise man will
prosper both inthis fife and “during the journey of
thousand years.”