You are on page 1of 3

NOTICE and DEMAND

From: [Your strawman name] Date:_______________


100 Any Street.
Any Town, Any Prov. PO Code SIN: ___________________

Attention;
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
COMMISSIONER FOR CRA
CRA (Area Office)

Re: Non-Payment of Demanded Refund Of Withheld Wages

Take notice that a T1 Return of Income for the taxpayer, (strawman name) was filed on
or about ( date), for the taxation year _________ , and, as no income tax was owing, as
shown on that T1 Return of Income, the wages of the undisclosed principal for whom
this party is agent in commerce and trustee in trust of all monies or assets collected for
and held in account for the undisclosed principal who is a living free will adult man, and
who was and is not subject to any provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada nor
subject to the harvesting of the fruits of the labour of a slave owned by the corporate
Crown in Right of Canada by way of an income tax, were demanded to be refunded in
full in that T1 Return of Income.

Any and all monies, currency or other asset values collected by, and under the name,
(strawman name), is a trust situation, and thus not the property of, nor the equitable
possession of (strawman name), who is a mindless and bodyless entity incapable of
giving value to anything by way of exchange of labour for currency.

You are hereby placed on notice that whereas, all assets, monies or other property
received and held in trust by the entity (strawman name) are for the undisclosed
principal and primary creditor, the free will adult man commonly called (John) of the
(Doe) family, who has a superior ‘claim in equity’ upon all such assets, monies and
property held or collected by (strawman name).

And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family is the
source of labour which has been converted to assets, monies and property held in trust
by the fictional entity, (strawman name).

And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family only uses
Her Majesty’s property, the legal name, (strawman name), by and under PRIVATE
NECESSITY only. The free will adult man has not voluntarily attached himself to that
legal identity name, and therefore is not surety or guarantor of any debts imposed upon
that legal identity name, nor is he the property of Her Majesty or Crown by way of
attachment.

And whereas, CRA and/or The Crown in right of Canada has only ‘legal claim’ for
debts imposed by the Crown upon the Crown owned entity, (strawman name), and has
no right of claim against the equity assets, monies and property held in trust by
(strawman name) for the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family.
Equity prevails over law (legal).
This notice is not disputing the right of Canada to impose the income tax upon
‘persons’,
the Crown owned legal name, and any adult human who is knowingly and voluntarily
attached to the legal identity name as a natural person, or, upon artificial persons; but
Canada, or the Crown in Right of Canada, has no right or authority to impose the
income tax upon a living free will adult man, where that party has not voluntarily
accepted/acknowledged that legal name as being ‘one and the same’ as him or her self.

And whereas, CRA legal claims, or imposed debts upon the bankrupt entity, (strawman
name) are not the responsibility of the beneficiary of trust, thus garnishment or the non-
refunding when demanded to do so of the assets in trust is an unlawful act by CRA
against the beneficiary.

And, since the legal name, (strawman name) is the property of the Crown in Right of
Canada, or of a Province of Canada, and Canada Revenue Agency is an agency of the
Crown in Right of Canada, therefore, a trust where the Crown owned legal name is
trustee in trust, and the Crown owned CRA corporate agency confiscates or converts
currency, monies or assets held in that Crown trust by way of extorting that in trust
asset through the excuse of taxation of the Crown ‘trustee in trust’, where the
beneficiary is not Crown owned property, there appears to be a Criminal Breach of
Trust, as per the Criminal Code of Canada, Section 336:

Criminal breach of trust


336. Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in
whole or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts,
with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a
use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 296.

And, relative to a demanded refund, I refer you to the Criminal Code of Canada,
Section 337 :

Public servant refusing to deliver property


337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in
right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by
virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of
anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and
does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term
not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
As ‘Trustee in Trust’, this party/person, (strawman name) hereby demands the
requested refund as stated in the T1 Return of Income heretofor mentioned in this
notice be sent to this party forthwith. As ‘trustee in trust’ this party is authorized by the
undisclosed principal and beneficiary to make this demand.

Sincerely,

I, commonly called John of the Doe family, a free will adult man,
and scribe for the entity, (strawman name written) for Her Majesty in right of Canada

You might also like