Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oe 29 11 17215
Oe 29 11 17215
© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement
1. Introduction
A photonic crystal (PC) offers in itself a synthetic medium where propagation of electromagnetic
(EM) wave is prohibited over a specific frequency range known as the photonic band gap (PBG)
[1]. The unique characteristics of PCs, which arise from periodic variation of dielectric constant
of the constituent medium, have inspired researchers to control the propagation and confinement
of light in a variety of systems, which include but are not limited to optical switches, microcavities,
waveguides and filters [2–5]. Though periodicty is integral to the design of PC based structures,
interestingly the requirement of perodicity for the existence of PBG has somewhat been diluted by
recent studies, which suggest that PBG-like transmission gaps can exist in quasi-periodic, or even
in disordered media. Band gaps for TM- or TE-polarized wave have been theoretically predicted
or experimentally demonstrated for photonic quasi-crystals where quasi-periodic variation of
dielectric constant results in the scattering required to inhibit the flow of light over a specific range
of the spectrum [6–8]. Complete photonic band gaps have also been attained in two-dimensional
quasicrystals designed based on the concept of hyperuniformity, which represents an exotic
amorphous state of matter that lies between perfect crystals and ordinary fluids [9,10]. A weakly
disordered system of dielectric scatterers, derived from their perfectly ordered counterparts, also
reportedly exhibit PBG-like transmission gaps for a specific polarization of the EM wave [11,12].
#426153 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.426153
Journal © 2021 Received 26 Mar 2021; revised 2 May 2021; accepted 4 May 2021; published 19 May 2021
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17216
In spite of the referred detailed studies on the formation and characterization of PBG in
periodic, quasi-periodic, and hyperuniform structures, there has not been any report on whether
similar transmission gaps can be attained in strongly disordered systems, where any form of
quasi-crystallinity is non-existent. A two-dimensional (2D) uniform random array of dielectric
scatterer deserves particular attention in this regard as such an array is representative of the 2D
cross-section of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) grown self-organized nanowires, which have
gained extensive utilization among the photonics and optoelectronics research community owing
to their superior electrical properties and light-trapping characteristics [13,14]. From materials
perspective, GaN-based nanowires grown on silicon are particularly prospective as lasers and
detectors extending from UV to near-infrared regime of the spectrum have been experimentally
demonstrated based on these nanostructures [15–19], and more recently a monolithic photonic
integrated circuit has been reported based on III-nitride nanowires grown on (001) silicon
substrate [20]. Though tunability of Anderson localized resonant modes have been confirmed
in such self-organized nanowire arrays [21], it remains to be seen whether PBG-like tunable
transmission gaps can also be attained in these systems of uniform random scatterers.
Considering self-organized nanowire array to be the perfect testbed for exploring the possibility
of attaining tunable transmission gaps in the strongly disordered regime, in this work we present
a systematic study on the propagation of light in uniform random arrays of dielectric scatterers
having dimensonalities and areal densities similar to those of MBE-grown self-organized GaN
nanowire arrays on silicon. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of wave propagation in
the strong-disorder regime, transmission characteristics of light in perfectly ordered, correlated
weakly disordered and correlated strongly disordered arrays have also been assessed and compared.
The finite difference time domain (FDTD) based theoretical analysis presented in this work
suggests that in spite of the utter lack of periodicity, strongly disordered systems exhibit PBG-like
transmission gaps which can be predicted from diameter and areal density of the nanowire
arrays. Furthermore, without any loss of generality, we show that such transmission gaps can
be tuned by controlling areal density and diameter of the uniform random array of nanowires.
Detailed analysis of spectral characteristics suggest that in spite of the high degree of disorder,
the underlying Mie and Bragg scattering resonances result in the emergence of band gap and the
consequent tunability of transmission properties in the strong-disorder regime.
where ϵr is relative dielectric constant of the scattering medium, d is average diameter of the
scatterer, and f is filling fraction of the scatterers in the medium. Based on Eq. (1), contour plots
describing correlation between different diameters, fill factors and l/lc values are shown over a
wide range of wavelength in Fig. 1(a). Similar to a phase space diagram, the contours represent
different combinations of d and f for which strong- or weak-localizations occur. The contours
having l/lc = 1 correspond to strong-localization regime, and therefore the corresponding
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17217
random media constitute in themselves strongly disordered systems. As can be observed, strong
localization is obtained for random arrays having fill factors ranging from 40 − 50 % and scatterer
diameters of 60-90 nm. These dimensions are in accordance with diameters and areal densities
of epitaxially grown self-organized III-Nitride nanowires arrays, which have been extensively
utilized for experimentally realizing electrically pumped visible and near-infrared lasers on (001)
silicon [23]. In line with such practical relevance, the mentioned diameters and fill factors of the
nanowires have been considered in this work. The two-dimensional (2-D) cross-sectional view
of a representative uniform random array of d, having GaN nanowires of 60 nm diameter and
50 % fill factor, is shown in Fig. 1(b).
Fig. 1. (a) Contour plot of l/lc for different diameters and fill-factors of the nanowire arrays;
(b) cross-sectional view of uniform random and (c) periodic array having identical diameter
and fill-factor of 60 nm and 50% respectively; (d) disorder strength (ζ) as a function of
allowed variation for different fill-factors of the arrays (inset shows unit cell of periodic array
having diameter d and lattice constant a); (e) weakly correlated disordered (ζ = 0.1425), (f)
and strongly correlated disordered (ζ = 0.9963) arrays with diameters and fill-factors of 60
nm and 50% respectively.
δx = (P/100) × R × rx
(2)
δy = (P/100) × R × ry
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17218
Here P is a percentage randomness parameter defined as P ∈ [0, 100], {rx , ry } are uniform
random numbers within the range [-1, 1] and R is the allowed range of variation. To avoid
overlapping of nanowires in an array, center-to-center distance between adjacent nanowires is
maintained to be larger than their diameters. To have a quantitative estimate of the degree of
disorder of an array, the parameter disorder strength (ζ) is defined and calculated as follows [24]:
N (︃
1 ∑︂ Aj − µA Bj − µB
)︃ (︃ )︃
ζ =1− (3)
N − 1 j=1 σA σB
Here A and B are one dimensional vectors created by converting two-dimensional refractive
index profiles of the periodic and correlated-disordered structures respectively, N is the total
number of elements in each array, µA (µB ) and σA (σB ) are mean and standard deviation of vector
A (B) respectively. In Fig. 1(d), ζ is plotted as a function of R for different fill factors of the arrays.
As can be observed, even for the highest value of the randomness parameter (P = 100), disorder
strength can be substantially low if the allowed range of variation is small. It has been reported
earlier that an allowed range of variation of a/5, which corresponds to ζ = 0.20 according to
Fig. 1(d), results in a weakly disordered system. This is in accordance with our previous work
where it has been shown that strong-localization of light in GaN nanowires occur in random
systems having disorder strengths of about 0.4 or higher [21]. In this work, by considering R =
a/2, correlated disordered arrays having ζ values of 0.14 and 0.99 (shown in Figs. 1(e)–1(f))
have been generated as representative weakly- and strongly-disordered systems respectively. It
is noteworthy that though both the arrays of Figs. 1(b) and 1(f) represent strongly disordered
systems of identical fill factors and nanowire diameters, the former represents a uniform random
system whereas the latter is a correlated disordered array generated based on the periodic array
of Fig. 1(c).
Spatial, temporal and spectral aspects of light-transmission characteristics in the nanowire
arrays have been analyzed based on finite difference time domain (FDTD) analysis technique.
Open-source software package MEEP has been utilized for FDTD simulation of both random and
periodic arrays [25]. Bandstructures of the periodic arrays have been estimated using open-source
eigen-frequency solver MPB [26]. Throughout this study a Gaussian pulse source having spectral
extent of 200 nm to 600 nm is end-fired from one end of the array, and transmittance is measured
from the opposite end. Phase matched layer (PML) having thickness greater than the highest
wavelength of the source is utilized around the computational region to model an open-system.
Transmitted and reflected flux have been spectrally resolved and normalized to have an estimate
of transmission properties of the arrays.
spacing (∆λm ) between adjacent spikes vary in accordance with the relation ∆λm = 2L 2L
m − m+1 ,
where m is the mode number of FP resonant mode. It is also noteworthy that the PBG calculated
in Fig. 2(a) is narrower than the transmission gap shown in Fig. 2(b). Such difference arises
from finite dimensionality of the nanowire array. The bandstructure shown in Fig. 2(a) is for a
photonic crystal of infinite extent, whereas the transmittance spectra of Fig. 2(b) are computed for
a 3 × 3 µm2 periodic array. In fact, transmittance of this finite array is not exactly zero over the
transmission gap, though the value remains negligibly small (from 10−6 to 10−3 ) for all practical
purposes. Nevertheless, bandstructure calculations and FDTD simulation results suggest that
transmission gap of the finite dimensional periodic system is directly correlated to PBG of the
photonic crystal, and for the considered dimensions of GaN-nanowire arrays, the transmission
gap varies from UV to visible regime of the spectra for TM-polarized waves. Considering
controllability of transmission characteristics over this wavelength range in GaN-based systems,
this study henceforth investigates transmission characteristics for TM-polarized incident waves.
Fig. 2. (a) Photonic bandstructure of both TE and TM modes of periodic array having
70 nm diameter and 50 % fill-factor (the PBG under consideration is highlighted in green),
and corresponding (b) transmittance (T) and reflectance (R) spectra; (c) contour plot of
transmittance for different diameters with a constant fill-factor of 50 %, and (d) transmittance
spectra for varying fill-factors of periodic arrays having nanowire diameters of 70 nm (solid
lines) and 60 nm (dotted lines).
50%, the transmission-gap shifts towards smaller wavelength, and also the bandwidth decreases
gradually from about 100 nm to 62 nm. Such dependence of transmission-gap on diameter and
fill-factor can be explained in terms of lattice constant √︁ (a), which is related to diameter and
fill-factor of the array according to the relation a = 0.25πd2 /f . This relation suggests that
the increase (decrease) of diameter (fill-factor) while keeping fill-factor (diameter) constant
effectively increases lattice constant of the array. Therefore according to the dispersion relation,
a red-shift of the PBG is expected for the increase (decrease) of diameter (fill-factor) of the
periodic structure. It is also noteworthy from Fig. 2(d) that upper-edge of the transmission-gap
is governed by fill-factor of the array, whereas nanowire dimension defines lower-edge of the
gap. Therefore significant tunability of transmission characteristics can be attained by varying
fill-factor and diameter of nanowires of the periodic array.
Having analyzed transmission properties of periodic nanowire arrays, wave propagation
characteristics of correlated- and uniform-disordered structures are analyzed and compared
in what follows. In Fig. 3(a), transmission and reflection spectra of correlated and uniform
disordered nanowire arrays are compared with those of the equivalent periodic array. As can be
observed, in spite of the lack of periodicity, transmission gaps similar to the photonic gap of a
periodic system are obtained for the disordered arrays. Though such characteristics have earlier
been reported for weakly disordered systems operating in the microwave regime [12], here it is
noteworthy that stop-bands of near-zero transmission are obtained in the strong-disordered regime
as well. In addition to the transmission gap, correlated disordered systems having a low degree
of disorder (e.g. with ζ=0.14) tends to retain some of the FP resonant peaks, which have been
observed earlier in the transmission spectra of the periodic structure. However in both uniform
random and strongly-disordered systems, such resonant peaks are non-existent because of the
dominance of random scattering events. The log-scale plot of transmission spectra (shown as an
inset of Fig. 3(a)) of the correlated strongly disordered system (with ζ=0.99) and uniform random
system suggests that transmittance is about an order of magnitude smaller in the uniform random
one. It may be noted that uniform random systems are spatially uncorrelated to the periodic ones
and are generated based on uniform random distributions. Consequently, a disorder strength
based on Eq. (3) cannot be evaluated for a uniform random array. Nonetheless, it is quite obvious
that the emergence of transmission gap is expected to be more pronounced in uniform random
systems than in strongly disordered arrays having near-unity ζ values. Also transmission-gap
shrinkage appears to be more pronounced in the uniform random system. As will be discussed
later, this is possibly related to the higher fraction of Bragg process in such media. It may
also be noted that though transmission characteristics of periodic and disordered systems over
the gap region appear to be similar in terms of absolute value of transmittance, transmission
coefficients and therefore transmission phases are expected to be different. A theoretical study on
the comparison between transmission coefficients of photonic crystals and disordered arrays was
beyond the scope of the present work.
To ascertain that such observation of PBG-like near-zero transmission is independent of spatial
distribution of the array, configurational averaged transmitted and reflected flux for four different
random arrays having identical diameters and fill-factors are calculated and plotted in Fig. 3(b).
The flux spectra confirm that distinct and repeatable transmission gaps are obtained for the
strongly-disordered random arrays irrespective of spatial configuration of the scatterers. Besides
exhibiting transmission-gaps, strongly disordered systems demonstrate tunability of transmission
characteristics similar to the case of a periodic system. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the center of the
TM transmission-gap of a uniform random array having f = 50 % can be conveniently tuned
from about 370 nm to 410 nm by varying nanowire diameter from 60 nm to 90 nm. Also similar
to the case of a periodic system, transmission-gap of the uniform random system can be tuned
towards smaller wavelength by increasing the fill-factor, while maintaining a constant diameter of
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17221
the nanowires. Such characteristics are shown in Fig. 3(d), where fill factor of uniform random
arrays having d = 70 nm is varied from 30 % to 50 %.
In the context of perturbation theory, it is understandable that transmission properties of a
correlated weakly-disordered array can be predicted from transmission characteristics of the
corresponding periodic system. However it is quite remarkable that in spite of the lack of spatial-
correlation with the periodic system, a uniform random array exhibits tunable transmission
characteristics over the same wavelength regime as that of the periodic one. From these
observations it can be inferred that transmission characteristics of a periodic system are retained
even in an uncorrelated strongly-disordered one, if identical dimensions (represented here by
diameter) and areal-density (represented here by fill-factor) of scatterers are maintained within
the two media. Such similarity in transmission properties possibly emanate from the underlying
Bragg process in these structures. To gain further insight into this phenomenon, transmission
gaps of the nanowire arrays are carefully examined. A closer observation of the transmittance
spectra of Fig. 3(a) suggest that transmission-gap of the arrays gradually shrink from 52 nm to
35 nm with increasing disorder in the arrays. This is further illustrated in the inset of Fig. 3(d)
where relative transmission-gap, χ = ∆λ(ζ)/∆λ(0) is plotted as a function of disorder strength.
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17222
Fig. 4. Relative bandgap and Bragg contribution plotted as a function of disorder strength
for correlated disordered arrays of different disorder strengths
in this work. This is quite similar to the concept of designing high quality factor resonant
modes by employing point or line defects in photonic crystals. Just as the resonant mode of
a PC-based resonator can be tuned by controlling PBG of the underlying structure, we notice
that the Anderson localized resonant modes can be tuned by controlling transmission gap of the
corresponding strongly-disordered scattering medium.
Fig. 5. (a) Dependence of center wavelength and gap-midgap ratio on nanowire diameter
(for a constant fill-factor of 50 %) and (b) fill-factor (for a constant diameter of 70 nm), for
both periodic and uniform random systems.
From the discussions so far it is quite obvious that scattering is expected to play a dominant
role to reduce output transmission in disordered systems comprising of dielectric scatterers. To
have an estimate of the degree of scattering in these systems, transmittance of perfectly ordered
nanowire arrays and uniform random nanowire arrays of identical diameters (d = 60 nm) and
fill factor (f = 50 %) are compared for different lengths (L) of the waveguides. For all these
waveguides, the width is kept fixed at 3 µm. The transmittance plot of Fig. 6(a) suggests that
transmittance of the periodic system remains invariant with the system length. However in the
uniform random system, the transmittance tends to decreases with increasing propagation length.
This is further illustrated in Fig. 6(b), which plots the light output at a transmission wavelength
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17224
of 550 nm. As can be observed, the output of the random system decreases linearly with system
length, whereas in the periodic system it almost remains constant. Similar characteristic trends
have been experimentally reported for a self-organized nanowire array based green laser [29].
To have a quantitative estimate of the degree of scattering in periodic and random arrays, light
scattering in both these systems have been analyzed by computing the in-plane scattered flux,
perpendicular to the direction of wave transmission. The flux planes along which scattering is
calculated are denoted as ‘Scattering Monitors’ (Fig. 6(c)). As can be observed, at wavelengths
above the transmission gap, scattering is minimal in the periodic systems for all lengths of the
waveguide. However in the random system, the fraction of scattered light tends to decrease with
increasing length of the waveguide. As shown in Fig. 6(d), the fraction of in plane scattered light
can be as high as 40 % in a random system having L = 7 µm. This explains the considerably low
output transmission of the random system. For both periodic and random systems, scattering
appears to be small within 260 nm -290 nm as this wavelength range falls within the transmission
gap of the array and consequently a very small fraction of the incident light is collected by
the scattering monitors. To further clarify this point, we have included as insets electric field
distributions in these arrays for an incident Gaussian flux having center wavelength of λ = 277
nm. As can be observed, almost all the light is reflected back to the source for this incident
flux, and consequently the light collected by the scattering monitor comes out to be significantly
small. Similar characteristics are obtained for any wavelength of the input flux residing within
Fig. 6. (a) Transmittance spectra of periodic and uniform random systems having nanowire
diameter, array width and fill-factor values of 60 nm, 3 µm and 50 %, respectively, while
the system lengths (L) is varied from 3 µm to 7 µm, and (b) the corresponding output (in
dB) at 550 nm wavelength; (c) the resultant scattering spectra (normalized by input flux)
of the periodic, and (d) uniform random arrays (detection plane of scattered flux is shown
as an inset of (c)); electric field distributions in periodic and random arrays for an incident
wavelength of λ=277 nm have been shown as insets of (c) and (d) respectively.
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17225
spectral range of the transmission gap. As expected, beyond the transmission gap, in-plane
scattering appears to be significantly higher for the random system. In spite of such high degree
of scattering, the random system offers the tunability of transmission gap in accordance with
characteristics of periodic system having identical diameter and fill-factor of the nanowires,
thereby offering the prospect of designing disorder based photonic systems, including photonic
integrated circuits, where disorder can be exploited to obtain predictable output characteristics
within a degree of uncertainty. The findings presented here can also be extended to modulate
the behavior of light in a variety of nano-engineered disordered media, which are becoming
increasingly important for applications related to biological imaging, biosensing, non-invasive
medical diagnosis, nanophotonics and quantum information processing.
4. Conclusion
To summarize, two-dimensional uniform random scatterers having dielectric constant and
dimensionalities similar to those of self-organized GaN nanowire arrays have been considered to
investigate wave propagation in the strong-disorder regime. The finite-difference time domain
based numerical analysis of this study suggests that similar to the case of perfectly ordered and
weakly disordered systems, strongly-disordered arrays exhibit transmission gaps which can be
controlled by varying diameter and areal density of the scatterers. Configurational averaging
based light transmission characteristics of the random arrays suggest that band gaps in such
systems emanate from the complex interplay between Bragg scattering and Mie resonance in the
media. Though in-plane multiple scattering significantly diminishes light output at the receiving
end of these arrays, it is quite remarkable that the underlying Bragg scattering remains strong
enough for the transmission gap to be tuned over a pre-defined range of the EM spectrum. Such
observance of transmission gap and its subsequent tunability offers the prospect of designing
self-assemebled, disordered array based transmission medium, where disorder can be tailored to
meet specific requirements of the photonic systems.
Acknowledgments. The authors acknowledge the support and facilities obtained from the Department of Electrical
and Electronic Engineering (EEE), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). M. I. Tahmid also
acknowledges the facilities received from the Department of EEE, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
(SUST) during the course of this work.
Disclosures. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Data availability. Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may
be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
1. E. Yablonovitch, “Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(20),
2059–2062 (1987).
2. T. Fujisawa and M. Koshiba, “Finite-element modeling of nonlinear Mach-Zehnder interferometers based on
photonic-crystal waveguides for all-optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(1), 617–623 (2006).
3. J. Vasseur, P. A. Deymier, A. Khelif, P. Lambin, B. Djafari-Rouhani, A. Akjouj, L. Dobrzynski, N. Fettouhi, and J.
Zemmouri, “Phononic crystal with low filling fraction and absolute acoustic band gap in the audible frequency range:
A theoretical and experimental study,” Phys. Rev. E 65(5), 056608 (2002).
4. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and B. Li, “Optical switches and logic gates based on self-collimated beams in two-dimensional
photonic crystals,” Opt. Express 15(15), 9287–9292 (2007).
5. T. Dolgova, A. Maidykovski, M. Martemyanov, A. Fedyanin, O. Aktsipetrov, G. Marowsky, V. Yakovlev, and G.
Mattei, “Giant microcavity enhancement of second-harmonic generation in all-silicon photonic crystals,” Appl. Phys.
Lett. 81(15), 2725–2727 (2002).
6. Y. Chan, C. T. Chan, and Z. Liu, “Photonic band gaps in two dimensional photonic quasicrystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
80(5), 956–959 (1998).
7. K. Wang, S. David, A. Chelnokov, and J. Lourtioz, “Photonic band gaps in quasicrystal-related approximant
structures,” J. Mod. Opt. 50(13), 2095–2105 (2003).
8. A. Della Villa, S. Enoch, G. Tayeb, V. Pierro, V. Galdi, and F. Capolino, “Band gap formation and multiple scattering
in photonic quasicrystals with a penrose-type lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(18), 183903 (2005).
9. M. Florescu, S. Torquato, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Designer disordered materials with large, complete photonic band
gaps,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(49), 20658–20663 (2009).
Research Article Vol. 29, No. 11 / 24 May 2021 / Optics Express 17226
10. M. Florescu, S. Torquato, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Complete band gaps in two-dimensional photonic quasicrystals,”
Phys. Rev. B 80(15), 155112 (2009).
11. C. Rockstuhl, U. Peschel, and F. Lederer, “Correlation between single-cylinder properties and bandgap formation in
photonic structures,” Opt. Lett. 31(11), 1741–1743 (2006).
12. M. Bayindir, E. Cubukcu, I. Bulu, T. Tut, E. Ozbay, and C. Soukoulis, “Photonic band gaps, defect characteristics,
and waveguiding in two-dimensional disordered dielectric and metallic photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 64(19),
195113 (2001).
13. S. Arafin, X. Liu, and Z. Mi, “Review of recent progress of III-nitride nanowire lasers,” J. Nanophotonics 7(1),
074599 (2013).
14. M. De La Mata, X. Zhou, F. Furtmayr, J. Teubert, S. Gradečak, M. Eickhoff, A. F. i Morral, and J. Arbiol, “A review
of MBE grown 0D, 1D and 2D quantum structures in a nanowire,” J. Mater. Chem. C 1(28), 4300–4312 (2013).
15. K. Li, X. Liu, Q. Wang, S. Zhao, and Z. Mi, “Ultralow-threshold electrically injected AlGaN nanowire ultraviolet
lasers on Si operating at low temperature,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(2), 140–144 (2015).
16. A. Hazari, M. Zunaid Baten, L. Yan, J. M. Millunchick, and P. Bhattacharya, “An InN/InGaN/GaN nanowire array
guided wave photodiode on silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(19), 191102 (2016).
17. C. Zhao, N. Alfaraj, R. C. Subedi, J. W. Liang, A. A. Alatawi, A. A. Alhamoud, M. Ebaid, M. S. Alias, T. K. Ng, and
B. S. Ooi, “III-nitride nanowires on unconventional substrates: From materials to optoelectronic device applications,”
Prog. Quantum Electron. 61, 1–31 (2018).
18. A. Aiello, A. H. Hoque, M. Z. Baten, and P. Bhattacharya, “High-gain silicon-based InGaN/GaN Dot-in-Nanowire
array photodetector,” ACS Photonics 6(5), 1289–1294 (2019).
19. D. Wang, C. Huang, X. Liu, H. Zhang, H. Yu, S. Fang, B. S. Ooi, Z. Mi, J.-H. He, and H. Sun, “Highly uniform,
self-assembled AlGaN nanowires for self-powered solar-blind photodetector with fast-response speed and high
responsivity,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 9(4), 2000893 (2021).
20. A. Hazari, F. C. Hsiao, L. Yan, J. Heo, J. M. Millunchick, J. M. Dallesasse, and P. Bhattacharya, “1.3µ m optical
interconnect on silicon: A monolithic III-Nitride nanowire photonic integrated circuit,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
53(4), 1–9 (2017).
21. D. J. Paul, A. A. Mimi, A. Hazari, P. Bhattacharya, and M. Z. Baten, “Finite-difference time-domain analysis of the
tunability of Anderson localization of light in self-organized GaN nanowire arrays,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(4), 043104
(2019).
22. K. Arya, Z.-B. Su, and J. L. Birman, “Anderson localization of the classical electromagnetic waves in a disordered
dielectric medium,” in Scattering and Localization of Classical Waves in Random Media (World Scientific, 1990), pp.
373–403.
23. P. Bhattacharya, A. Hazari, S. Jahangir, W. Guo, and T. Frost, “III-nitride electrically pumped visible and near-infrared
nanowire lasers on (001) silicon,” in Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol. 96 (Elsevier, 2017), pp. 385–409.
24. D. J. Paul, S. Hossain, and M. Z. Baten, “Disorder induced rotational-symmetry breaking to control directionality of
whispering gallery modes in circularly symmetric nanowire assembly,” Opt. Express 27(16), 23645–23653 (2019).
25. A. F. Oskooi, D. Roundy, M. Ibanescu, P. Bermel, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. G. Johnson, “MEEP: A flexible
free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 181(3),
687–702 (2010).
26. S. G. Johnson and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Block-iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell’s equations in a
planewave basis,” Opt. Express 8(3), 173–190 (2001).
27. S. Nojima, G. Kaneda, and K. Aizawa, “Quantitative isolation of band-gap formation mechanisms by randomizing
the lattice arrangement in photonic crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. 113(12), 123105 (2013).
28. C. Liu, M. V. Rybin, P. Mao, S. Zhang, and Y. Kivshar, “Disorder-immune photonics based on Mie-resonant dielectric
metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(16), 163901 (2019).
29. T. Frost, S. Jahangir, E. Stark, S. Deshpande, A. Hazari, C. Zhao, B. S. Ooi, and P. Bhattacharya, “Monolithic
electrically injected nanowire array edge-emitting laser on (001) silicon,” Nano Lett. 14(8), 4535–4541 (2014).