The Linear Stages of Growth Theory focuses on the idea that economies go through

distinct stages of development, with each stage characterized by different economic

characteristics and growth rates. In contrast, the Structural Change Models propose
that economic growth is driven by structural changes within the economy, such as
shifts in employment from agriculture to industry.

In terms of understanding economic and social problems in developing countries,

both sets of theories/models provide valuable insights. The Linear Stages of Growth
Theory highlights the importance of investment in physical and human capital, while
the Structural Change Models emphasize the need for diversification and structural
transformation. However, neither set of theories/models is sufficient on their own
to solve the complex problems faced by developing countries. A more comprehensive
approach that takes into account political, social, and cultural factors is
necessary for sustained and inclusive economic growth and development.

•••••••••••••¥

In recent years, economists have proposed different theories of economic growth.

The two theories that are used most often are the Lewis Model and the Rostov-Dommar
Model. One important aspect of these two models is that they differ significantly
in their approaches to growth. Through this essay, I will explain each model’s
conception of growth, as well as its strengths and weaknesses.
The Linear Stage Growth Model is a theory developed by Nobel Prize winning
economist W.W. Rostov. This model describes a situation where an individual in the
economy is at a particular stage of his or her life.
As with most economic models, this one consists of three main factors: aggregate
demand, aggregate supply and population growth rate. The first factor essentially
states that during the early stages in the economy's development, consumption is
relatively high because people have to invest heavily in order to develop their
skills and resources that would allow them to move on to the next stage as they
become more specialized in their job/job positions. Investment at this point is
necessary because it allows for greater production later on in life which
essentially leads to higher wages and more consumption power (through saving) which
eventually leads to even more investment and thus greater production. Aggregate
supply on the

The Linear Stages of Growth Theory by W.W. Rostow and Harrod-Domar's theory focus
on the idea of economic growth in a linear and controlled manner. This theory
suggests that economic growth happens in a series of five stages, which lead to a
developed economy. On the other hand, the Structural Change Models of Arthur Lewis
and Hollis Chenery suggest that economic growth is a result of structural changes
in the economy. The theory proposes that the economy should shift from traditional
agriculture to modern industries.
Both sets of theories provide some understanding of the economic and social
problems in developing countries. However, the Structural Change Models appear to
be more effective in solving these problems. This is because they emphasize the
importance of shifting from traditional agriculture to modern industries, which can
create employment opportunities and increase productivity.
In contrast, the Linear Stages of Growth Theory may not be as effective because it
assumes a linear progression towards economic development, which may not be
applicable to all countries. Additionally, it does not account for the social and
political factors that can influence economic growth.
In conclusion, while both theories provide some insight into economic growth and
development, the Structural Change Models provide a more practical and effective
approach to solving the economic and social problems faced by developing countries.
Explain the essential distinctions between the Linear Stages of Growth Theory by W.
W. Rostov/Harrod-Dommar in contrast with the Structural Change Models of Arthur
Lewis and Hollis Chenery.
The Linear Stages of Growth Theory by W.W. Rostow and Harrod-Dommar focus on the
stages of growth that a country goes through as it develops. This theory suggests
that countries go through five stages of growth, starting with traditional society
and ending with high mass consumption. In contrast, the Structural Change Models of
Arthur Lewis and Hollis Chenery emphasize the importance of structural change, such
as the shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy, as the driving force
behind economic growth. These models suggest that economic growth requires a shift
in resources from the traditional sector to the modern sector. Overall, while both
theories attempt to explain the process of economic growth, they differ in their
emphasis on the stages of growth versus the importance of structural change.

……………………
Economic growth and development are two concepts that are often used
interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. Economic growth refers to an
increase in the quantity of goods and services produced by an economy over time,
while development refers to improvements in the quality of life of people in that
economy, such as increased access to education, healthcare, and basic necessities.
While economic growth is necessary for development, it is not sufficient on its
own.

There are two sets of theories/models that attempt to explain the process of
economic growth and development: the Linear Stages of Growth Theory by W. W.
Rostov/Harrod-Dommar and the Structural Change Models of Arthur Lewis and Hollis
Chenery. These two sets of theories/models have essential distinctions that shape
their approaches to economic growth and development.

The Linear Stages of Growth Theory proposes that economies go through a series of
stages as they develop, starting with traditional societies and progressing through
preconditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and high mass consumption.
According to this theory, economic growth is a linear process that can be achieved
through investment in physical capital, technology, and education. The Harrod-Domar
Model, a variation of this theory, emphasizes the importance of investment in
stimulating economic growth.

In contrast, the Structural Change Models propose that economic growth and
development are driven by structural changes in the economy, such as changes in the
composition of output and employment. Arthur Lewis's Dual Sector Model suggests
that economic growth is driven by the transfer of labor from the low-productivity
agricultural sector to the high-productivity industrial sector. Hollis Chenery's
Patterns of Development Model emphasizes the importance of diversifying the economy
and increasing productivity in different sectors to promote economic growth and
development.

Both sets of theories/models provide valuable insights into the economic and social
problems in developing countries and the basis for solving those problems. The
Linear Stages of Growth Theory highlights the importance of investment in physical
capital, technology, and education to stimulate economic growth, while the
Structural Change Models emphasize the need for structural changes in the economy
to promote economic growth and development.

However, these theories/models also have limitations. The Linear Stages of Growth
Theory assumes that all economies follow a linear path to development, which may
not be the case in reality. The Structural Change Models assume that the transfer
of labor from low-productivity sectors to high-productivity sectors is
straightforward, which may not be true in practice.
In conclusion, both sets of theories/models provide valuable insights into economic
growth and development in developing countries. However, a comprehensive
understanding of economic growth and development requires a combination of these
theories/models and an understanding of the unique economic and social contexts of
each developing country. Ultimately, economic growth and development require a
multidimensional approach that addresses not only investment in physical capital
and structural changes but also improvements in social and human development.

There are many theories/models tried to describe the process(or paths)of growth in
developing countries. The linear stage of growth model put forward by
W.W.Rostow/Harrod-Domar is an example of this kind of theories/models. On the
contrary, the structural changes models put forward by Arthur Lewis and Hollis
Chenery are some other examples. In this essay, i will identify the essential
distinctions between the two types of these theories/models and assess the extent
to which these two sets of models can provide better understanding of the economic
and social problems in developing countries ( more specifically, my own country,
China) .

As outlined by Rostov and Harrod-Domar, two economists in the field of economics,

both growth and development may be understood as the process of moving from the
'undeveloped' to the 'developed'. This process is achieved through different forms
of capital accumulation, including physical human capital accumulation. The process
of growth takes place throughout a defined period of time in contrast to
development which happens over longer periods of time. Both growth and development
are reached when a society's knowledge base has increased, skills have been added
and infrastructure has improved to allow for greater production and an improved
standard of living.

No Caller ID