Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: T. Nishida, K. Akagi & Y. Tanaka (1997) Correlation between cell
killing effect and cell membrane potential after heat treatment: analysis using fluorescent
dye and flow cytometry, International Journal of Hyperthermia, 13:2, 227-234, DOI:
10.3109/02656739709012385
Correlation between cell killing effect and cell membrane potential after
heat treatment: analysis using fluorescent dye and flow cytometry
T. NISHIDAt, K. AKAGI and Y. TANAKA
Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University 10-1 5 , Fumizonocho,
Moriguchi City, Osaka, Japan
1. Introduction
Hyperthermia has been generally accepted as an effective treatment modality for
cancers. Exposure of tumour cells to a temperature between 43 and 46°C produces
multiple effects on cellular metabolism. It inhibits the synthesis of some proteins
(Henle and Leeper 1979), and the metabolism of high-energy phosphates (Sinesky et
al. 1979), and induces heat-shock proteins such as hsp70 and 72 (Kelley and
Schlesinger 1978). Although there have been many reports regarding the possible
mechanisms of the cell killing effect of hyperthermia, the actual mechanism has not
been clarified yet even a t the cellular level.
The cell membrane may be the critical target for hyperthermia. Many reports
have noted that hyperthermia causes structural and functional changes in the cell
membrane (Papahadjopoulos et al. 1973, Wallach et al. 1979, Quirt and Mackillop
1991, Dynlacht and Fox 1992). Microelectrodes have been employed to measure the
cell membrane potential. However, it is difficult to examine the changes of mem-
was adjusted so that the mean value of fluorescence intensity before heat treatment
should be 300 channels.
3. Results
Figure 1 shows histograms of the distribution of fluorescence intensity obtained
by flow cytometry. Histograms shifted to the right with heating time. Although, we
only show histograms obtained by heat treatment at 43°C here, the increase in
fluorescence intensity was also revealed at all heating temperature from 41 to 44°C.
The relative change of fluorescence intensity was calculated from the mean fluor-
escence intensity of 10 000 cells after heat treatment and that before heat treatment,
and expressed in percentage.
Figure 2 shows changes in fluorescence intensity immediately after heat treat-
ment at 4144°C. The fluorescence intensity at each heating temperature increased
with heating time. The changes in fluorescence intensity at 30 min were 122% at
41"C, 128.5% at 42"C, 135% at 43"C, and 152% at 44°C and changes at 60 rnin
were 132% at 41°C 140.4% at 42"C, 156.2% at 43"C, and 162.7% at 44°C.
Figure 3 shows the survival rate curves after heat treatment at 42,43 and 44°C as
assayed by the colony formation method. The survival rate at 30 min was 90% at
42"C, 50% at 43°C and 5% at 44°C. And at 60 min, it was 70% at 42"C, 4% at
43"C, and 0.09% at 44°C.
Figure 4 shows the relationship between the fluorescence intensity immediately
after heat treatment and the survival rates as assayed by the colony formation
method after heat treatment, i.e., the relationship between the change in membrane
potential and the degree of cell killing effect. When the survival rate was 50 and 6O%,
the fluorescence intensity was 122.8 and 126.7% (heated at 43°C for 20 min, at 44°C
for 5 min), when the survival rate was 25 and do%, the fluorescence intensity was
131.3 and 135% (heated at 43°C for 30 min, at 44°C for 10 min), and when the
survival rate was 4 and 5 % , the fluorescence intensity was 152 and 156.2% (heated at
43°C for 60 min, at 44°C for 30 rnin). The relationship between the increase in
fluorescence intensity and the decrease in survival rate at 43°C also compared
with that at 42°C. When the fluorescence intensity increased to even 130% at
42"C, the survival rate fell to only 50%. In the relationship between the change of
survival rate and fluorescence intensity, the statistical significance was examined
between heat temperatures using student t test. There were no statistically significant
differences between heat treatment at 43°C and that at 44°C. However, there was a
230 T. Nishida et al.
Fluorescence Intensity
Figure 1. The histograms obtained by flow cytometry immediately after heating. The hor-
izontal axis indicates fluorescence intensity and the vertical axis indicates number of cells.
The heating temperature is 43°C: (A) preheating; (B) heated for 10 min; (C) heated for 20
min; (D) heated for 30 min; (E) heated for 60 min. These histograms shifted to the right
with heating time. This phenomenon indicates the depolarization of membrane potential.
lSO)
*s
h
Y
160
a2
Y
E
U
8 140
x2 120
0
1
G; 100
0 30 60 90 120
Heating Time (min.)
Figure 2. The changes of fluorescence intensity after heat treatment. The fluorescence inten-
sity are expressed as percentages of the control (preheating). The fluorescence intensity
increased with heating time at all heating temperature. 41°C 0, 42°C 0, 43°C A and
44°C *.
Hyperthermia and membrane potential 23 1
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 0
n 10-
&
v
!
.
c3
)
u
m 1-
k
0.1-
. _
U.Ul :
100 125 150 175
Figure 4. Correlation between the changes of fluorescence intensity and changes of surviving
fraction. The changes in fluorescence intensity is plotted on the horizontal axis and the
surviving fraction is plotted on the vertical axis. The data of figure 3 and 4 are applied. In
the relation between the survival rate and rate of fluorescence change, there was no
statistically significant differences between heat treatment at 43 and at 44°C. However,
there was statistically significant differences between heat treatment at 42 and at 43 or
44°C. 42°C 0, 43"A and 44°C +.
232 T. Nishida et al.
0 2 4 6 8
Time After Heat treatment (hrs.)
Figure 5. The changes of fluorescence intensity measured at 2,4 and 6 h after heat treatment
at 42 and 44°C. At 6 h after heat treatment at 44°C for 10 min, the fluorescence intensity
+
remained at 122 3%, while, it recovered rapidly to about 114 f 3% at 2 h after heat
treatment and returned to the pre-treatment level at 6 h after heat treatment at 42°C for
30 min. 42°C 0, 44°C +.
4. Discussion
For direct measurement of membrane potentials, the method with microelec-
trodes has been employed. However, the changes in membrane potential by heat
treatment was difficult to examine because of technical difficulties, difficulties in
measuring the potential immediately after heat treatment, and limitations in the
number of cells for measurement by this direct method. However, it is possible to
indirectly measure the changes in membrane potential by observing changes in
fluorescence intensity using cyanine dyes which move across the membrane accord-
ing to the K+ gradient, since the membrane potential is proportional to the intra-
cellular Kf concentration. When the cells are depolarized, the fluorescence intensity
increases and when they are hyperpolarized, it decreases. These phenomena have
been demonstrated in electrophysical experiments carried out using K+ ionophores
in culture medium at different K+ concentrations (Shapiro 1988).
Hyperthermia and membrane potential 233
References
BATES,D. A., and MACKILLOP, W. J., 1985, The effect of hyperthermia on the sodium-potas-
sium pump in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Radiation Research, 103, 441451.
DYNLACHT, J. R., and Fox, M. H., 1992, The effect of 45°C hyperthermia on the membrane
fluidity of cells of several lines. Radiation Research, 130, 55-60.
HENLE,K. J., and LEEPER,D. B., 1979, Effects of hyperthermia (45°C) on macromolecular
synthesis on Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Research, 39, 2665-2674.
HOFFMAN, J. F., and LARIS,P. C., 1974, Determination of membrane potentials in human and
amphiuma red blood cells by means of a fluorescent probe. Journal of Physiology, 239,
519-552.
KELLEY, P. M., and SCHLESINGER, M. J., 1978, The effect of amino acid analogues and heat
shock on gene expression in chicken embryo fibroblasts. Cell, 15, 1277-1286.
PAPAHADJOPOULOS, D., JACOBSON, K., NIR, S., and ISAC,T., 1973, Phase transitions in phos-
phoid vesicles. fluorescence polarization and permeability measurements concerning the
effect of temperature and cholesterol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 31 1, 330-348.
QUIRT,C. F., and MACKILLOP, W. J., 1991, The effect of hyperthermia on transmembrane
potential in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro. Radiation Research, 126, 96-103.
SHAPIRO, H. M., 1988, Practicalpow Cytometry, second edition (Alan R. Liss. Inc.)
SIMS,P. J., WAGGONER, A. S., WANG,C. H., and HOFFMAN, J. F., 1974, Studies on the
mechanism by which cyanine dyes measure membrane potential in red blood cells
and phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry, 13, 33 15-3330.
SINENSKY, M., PINKERTON, F., SUTHERLAND, E., and SIMON,f. R., 1979, Rate limitation of
(Na' - K+)-stimulated adenosinetriphosphatase by membrane acyl chain ordering.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 76, 48934897.
STEVENSON, A. P., GALEY, W. R., and TOBEY,R. A., 1983, Hyperthermia induced increase in
potassium transport in Chinese hamster cells. Journals of Cellular Physiology, 115, 75-
86.
WAGGONER, A. S . , 1979, Dye indicators of membrane potential. Annual Review of Biophysics
and Bioengineering, 8, 4748.
WALLACH, D. F. H., VERMA,S. P., and FOOKSON, J., 1979, Application of laser raman and
infrared spectroscopy to the analysis of membrane structure. Biochimica et Biosphysica
Acta, 559, 153-208.