Business Law UEH School of Law

LESSON No.5
Class: KNC01
Group No.2

No. Team Members’ Full Name Participated

[or not in the group

discussion]
1 Từ Gia Mẫn Paticipated

2 Phạm Thùy Dương Paticipated

3 Nguyễn Lê Bảo Trân Paticipated

[Please note:

- Any answer should be short, precious, and supported by a relevant legal basis
- If necessary, 01 file shall be submitted by the representative of the group.
- Name the file Lesson No. Group No. Datemonthyear. For example Lesson No.1. Group 1. 30102021]

1. Yes, because sending an email is a form of civil transactions.

(Art 119.1 and Art 386.1 CC 2015)

2. No, this isn’t a valid contract because Ms Tran Mai didn’t reply the offer from Ms
Hoang Anh. (25 million per table)
(Art 393 CC 2015)

3. No, this isn’t a valid contract because Ms Tran Mai didn’t reply the offer from Mr
Hung Cuong. (only 8 tables)
(Art 393 CC 2015)

4. Yes, because Ms Nguyet Nga accepted entire contents of the offer.

(Art 117 and 393.1 CC 2015)

5. Ms Tran Mai should sell tables to Ms Nguyet Nga because Ms Nguyet Nga fully
accepted the contents of her offer.

6. Ms Tran Mai breached her obligations with Mr Hung Cuong and didn’t breach her
obligations with Ms Nguyet Nga because she didn’t inform Mr Hung Cuong that all
the tables were made from Thailand.
(Art 387.1 CC 2015)

7. Yes, because when the contract between Ms Tran Mai and Mr Hung Cuong is
invalid then Mr Hung Cuong can return these tables to Ms Tran Mai
(Art 131.2 CC 2015)
Business Law UEH School of Law

8. No, because the contract didn’t include agreement on penalty previously.

(Art 418 CC 2015)

9. If he can prove that this contract brings damage to him, he can have the right to
require Ms Tran Mai pay for damage.
(Art 427.3 and 419 CC 2015)

10. Yes, because Ms Tran Mai didn’t inform truly the origin of these tables in the
contract (Thailand not US)
(Art 127.1 CC 2015)