Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This document outlines the basics of rapporteur work, as well as some general principles and
standards for documenting meetings and sessions.
Working as a Rapporteur
The rapporteur is tasked with documenting the meeting or session. This means providing clear
notes on what transpired, paying close attention to the nuances of the discussion. Doing so does
not entail transcribing the entire meeting, but instead collecting, organizing, and laying down the
important points that were raised.
The rapporteur is expected to draft notes. Notes are documents which reflect the events that
occurred during the meeting. They are not briefers or papers that need external technical
research. However, meeting notes will be used later to inform briefers, papers, or other outputs.
Good notes allow their readers to know and understand the meeting discussion without having to
attend. They are extremely useful for sharing the significant findings and outcomes of the session.
With good notes, researchers and decisionmakers need not watch the recordings to understand
what the participants are trying to say.
• Accurate – The notes should reflect the events of the meeting as closely as possible.
They should never include things that did not happen during the meeting, nor cause their
readers to be misled. Including the proper context as regards a certain point in the
discussion is a good way to secure accuracy. For example, direct or indirect quotes should
be preceded or followed by sentences which show (a) the question prompt or (b) the prior
discussion point to which it responds.
• Attributable – Notes should also properly attribute ideas. In other words, reader should
be able to easily determine who said what. This is important not only in maintaining
intellectual honesty and integrity, but also in allowing researchers and decisionmakers to
properly contextualize the participant’s inputs.
• Concise – It is not the rapporteur’s job to transcribe the meeting. Instead, the task entails
providing a succinct summary of what happened. This means weeding out unnecessary
words or turns of phrase in favor of presenting a clear message. This takes a bit of practice,
since the skill involves condensing ideas without losing specificity and nuance.
• Detailed – Issues and inputs which are surfaced in meetings present little value if they are
not accompanied with the necessary level of detail. The kind of relevant information
required varies across meetings, and it is the rapporteur’s job to calibrate the level of
sensitivity to detail which the discussion calls for. For example, if the session is a round
table discussion, it is important not only to take note of the exchange of ideas among the
participants, but also of how that exchange developed. If the session is a focus group
discussion, then the rapporteur needs to also pay close attention to non-verbal cues and
Page 1 of 4
reactions. A good way of doing this is including direct quotes, so that the idea and the
thinking process of the participant is sufficiently demonstrated. Sometimes it is also good
practice to note the way in which certain responses are delivered.
• Neutral – For the most part, the rapporteur is a fly on the wall. The notes should not show
the rapporteur’s personal bias for or against any idea. Even if the rapporteur disagrees
with a point or a particular segment in the discussion, such should not be omitted nor
minimized in the notes.
• Thematic – The hallmark of a good rapporteur is the ability to group similar and connected
ideas together. Points which were brought up, even at different points in time, are better
clustered under the same theme. This simultaneously reveals the scope of the discussion
and the depth at which it was explored during the meeting.
• Reader-friendly – Perhaps the most important and overarching principle in making good
notes is making sure that they are reader-friendly. The rapporteur should have in mind the
end-users of the notes. Good notes do not frustrate their readers nor leave them with
unanswered questions about the meeting. They also make good use of signposting, which
let the readers navigate the document with ease by providing informative headings and
sub-headings. Notice that the sample template has been crafted with this framework.
Duties of a Rapporteur
According to a learning brief from the Impact Innovations Development Centre, there are three (3)
phases involved in documenting meetings or sessions. This section outlines the rapporteur’s
duties in each phase, drawing from some of the best practices identified in the IIDC brief.1
Page 2 of 4
• Arrive at the venue or log in to the virtual platform 15-30 minutes before the meeting begins
and properly set up.
• For face-to-face meetings, find a good location from where you could:
o Clearly hear the facilitator and participants; and,
o Access an electrical outlet if you are using a device to record or take notes.
Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4