Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To be Entitled
by
Nagalingeswaran Armugam
Supervisor
04/08/2022
Introduction
The usage of wireless networks is inevitable in our daily lives such as using our smartphones,
laptops, etc. The growth of computer devices has also been rising exponentially in the last 40
years [Rappaport, 2015]. One of the factors that affect the performance of this network is the
attenuated wireless signal as a function of the distance between transmitter and receiver in a
realistic environment [Philips, 2013]. Therefore, the accurate estimation of signal propagation
loss is very important in terms of planning the design of modern wireless communication.
Problem statement
Fifth generation (5G) networks are expected to deliver higher data rates and lower latencies
as part of an improved overall quality of experience (QoE) for both fixed and mobile users.
The concept of ultra dense small cells at sub-6 GHz has been recognized as a key 5G
technology enabler due to its simplified interference and mobility management [Ding, 2018]
as well as its NLoS propagation and backhauling capability [Siddique, 2015]. Consequently,
channel characterization of these newly allocated frequency bands become vital in radio
network planning and coverage analysis. More extensive measurement data for covering
millimetre-wave bands is needed especially in Malaysia where 5G is still new to us. It is
necessary to develop more path loss models. To this aim, path loss measurement for indoor
environment is proposed. Performance of the measurement data will be evaluated and
analysed. Path loss model will be developed for an indoor office environment at sub-6GHz
frequency. Such research work will be beneficial for future development of millimetre wave
channel model.
Objectives
Scope
Literature Review
Path Loss
Path loss expresses wave propagation losses caused by many things such as the influence of
the earth’s surface (wave propagation through the earth’s surface, which tends to be
spherical/spherical), absorption losses, diffraction losses, and losses caused by the
phenomenon. Path loss can be calculated using the following equation [Sun et.al, 2017].
PLCI ( f , d )[dB ] FSPL ( f ,1m)[dB ] 10n log10 (d ) AT dB CI with d 1m (1)
where f represents the frequency in GHz, d represents the distance from the transmitter to the
receiver, n is the path loss exponent, AT is the attenuation caused by atmosphere, CI is a
zero-mean Gaussian random variable and FSPL is the free space path loss in dB.
The path loss of free space with a transmitter to receiver range of 1 m is then
calculated as
4 f 109
FSPL ( f ,1m )[dB ] 20 log
c (2)
32.4[ dB] 20 log10 ( f )
LoS/NLoS
Radio wave containing information will propagation from the sender to the receiver. The
radio wave propagation process is divided into two categories: Line of Sight (LoS) and Non
Line of Sight (NLoS) [Capano, 2018] as shown in Figure 1. In LoS, the transmitting antenna
can see the receiving antenna directly to send the information signal directly to the receiver.
Whereas in the NLoS, the sending antenna cannot directly see the presence of the receiver
after passing through several obstacles or being reflected.
Fig. 1: Illustration of LoS and NLoS propagation of radio waves [Walidainy, 2021]
With respect to radio coverage, path loss models characterize large-scale fading
effects and can be used to describe the signal attenuation with increasing distance. Path loss
measurements were carried out in an urban outdoor location around a city hall in [Lee at. al,
2017]. The path loss exponent and standard deviation of the shadow fading variable (Xσ)
obtained from the measurements over a 500 m Tx-Rx distance were 1.63 and 4.79 dB for LoS
with NLoS values at 5.76 and 19.1 dB. He et al. characterized the radio channel for 3.5 GHz
at Beijing Jiaotong University, China [He, et. al., 2016]. The measurement setup was made
up using National Instrument (NI) software defined radios (SDRs). The Tx-Rx separation
distances investigated were between 100 m and 250 m. In LoS scenarios, the path loss
exponent was 6.16 and Xσ was 4.21 dB. Path loss measurements were also taken in an indoor
industrial complex as reported by Chrysikos et al [Chrysikos, 2018]. The empirical models
presented covered same floor and multi floor propagation in LoS scenarios. The LoS path
loss exponent obtained was 1.8 for multi-wall-floor and 3.01 for all LoS locations. The Xσ for
same floor measurements in the office was 10.47 dB and 10.32 dB for the factory shop floor.
Methodology
Expected Result
It is expected to get path loss result in LoS and NLoS scenarios as shown in Figure 2.
Expected to develop path loss model and compare with existing model.
Fig. 2 Comparison of the path loss model with measurement data for NLoS condition [Zhao
et. al. 2013]
Reference
B. J. Lee, J.P. Cho, I.H. Ra and K.S. Kim. “Propagation characterization based on
Geographic location variation for 5G Small Cells,” Mobile Information system, 2017.
C. Phillips, D. Sicker and D. Grunwald, "A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and
Coverage Mapping Methods", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1,
pp. 255-270, 2013.
D. Capano “Wireless line of sight, non-line sight, beyond line of sight propagation,” Control
Engineering, Sept. 11, 2018.