Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kappa Method (Visual Inspection)

    Uploaded by

    dyson
    70 views2 pages
    The document describes the results of an analysis using the Kappa method to check the agreement between three appraisers (A, B, C) evaluating 50 parts. Each appraiser assessed whether certain features were present or absent, and their assessments were compared to a reference standard. The Kappa calculation sheet shows there was perfect agreement between the appraisers and the reference standard for all but two parts.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document describes the results of an analysis using the Kappa method to check the agreement between three appraisers (A, B, C) evaluating 50 parts. Each appraiser assessed whether certain features were present or absent, and their assessments were compared to a reference standard. The Kappa calculation sheet shows there was perfect agreement between the appraisers and the reference standard for all but two parts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    70 views2 pages

    Kappa Method (Visual Inspection)

    Uploaded by

    dyson
    The document describes the results of an analysis using the Kappa method to check the agreement between three appraisers (A, B, C) evaluating 50 parts. Each appraiser assessed whether certain features were present or absent, and their assessments were compared to a reference standard. The Kappa calculation sheet shows there was perfect agreement between the appraisers and the reference standard for all but two parts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    KAPPA METHOD Date: 08.07.

    2021

    Apperance : Cone Tool Mark Checking Method : Visual

    APPRAISER A APPRAISER B APPRAISER C


    PART REFERENCE REF. VALUE CODE
    A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3
    1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +
    17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    33 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    40 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +
    42 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    43 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    44 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    45 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    46 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    47 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +
    50 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +

    Note : APPRAISER A SHANMUGAM APPRAISER B LAKSHMANAN APPRAISER C KARUPPIYA


    Kappa CALCULATION SHEET
    B REF
    A X B TABULATION TOTAL A X REF TABULATION TOTAL
    00 1.00 00 1.00

    Count 6 0 6 Count 6.000 0 6


    00 00
    Expected Count 0.2 5.8 6.0 Expected Count 0.240 5.8 6.0
    A A
    Count 0 144 144 Count 0.000 144 144
    1.00 1.00
    Expected Count 5.8 138.2 144.0 Expected Count 5.760 138.2 144.0

    Count 6 144 150 Count 6.000 144 150


    TOTAL TOTAL
    Expected Count 6.0 144.0 150.0 Expected Count 6.000 144.0 150.0

    Po 150 Pe 138.48 Po 150 Pe 138.48

    C REF
    B X C TABULATION TOTAL B X REF TABULATION TOTAL
    00 1.00 00 1.00

    Count 6 0 6 Count 6.000 0 6


    00 00
    Expected Count 0.2 5.8 6.0 Expected Count 0.240 5.8 6.0
    B B
    Count 0 144 144 Count 0.000 144 144
    1.00 1.00
    Expected Count 5.8 138.2 144.0 Expected Count 5.760 138.2 144.0

    Count 6 144 150 Count 6.000 144 150


    TOTAL TOTAL
    Expected Count 6.0 144.0 150.0 Expected Count 6.000 144.0 150.0

    Po 150 Pe 138.48 Po 150 Pe 138.48

    C REF
    C X A TABULATION TOTAL C X REF TABULATION TOTAL
    00 1.00 00 1.00

    Count 6 0 6 Count 6.000 0 6


    00 00
    Expected Count 0.2 5.8 6.0 Expected Count 0.240 5.8 6.0
    A C
    Count 0 144 144 Count 0.000 144 144
    1.00 1.00
    Expected Count 5.8 138.2 144.0 Expected Count 5.760 138.2 144.0

    Count 6 144 150 Count 6.000 144 150


    TOTAL TOTAL
    Expected Count 6.0 144.0 150.0 Expected Count 6.000 144.0 150.0

    Po 150 Pe 138.48 Po 150 Pe 138.48

    kappa A B C A B C
    A - 1.00 1.00 Kappa 1.00 1.00 1.00

    B 1.00 - 1.00
    C 1.00 1.00 -

    Guidelines for Acceptance of Kappa are: Conclusion:

    X 0.75≤ 1, good excellent Agreement 1. All the Appraisers have got a GOOD AGREEMENT between each others.

    0.40 ≥ Poor Agreement 2. Appraisers knew the measurement standards for the Parameters

    Performed By: Quality Incharge Approved By: Quality Head Date: 08.07.2021

    You might also like