The document proves Lagrange's theorem that the order of any subgroup H of a group G divides the order of the group G. It first shows that the left cosets of H partition G by assuming two cosets have a common element, which leads to a contradiction. It then argues that since the cosets partition G and all have the same size as H, the index of H in G, represented as |G:H|, multiplied by the size of H must equal the size of G. This implies the size of H divides the size of G, proving Lagrange's theorem.
The document proves Lagrange's theorem that the order of any subgroup H of a group G divides the order of the group G. It first shows that the left cosets of H partition G by assuming two cosets have a common element, which leads to a contradiction. It then argues that since the cosets partition G and all have the same size as H, the index of H in G, represented as |G:H|, multiplied by the size of H must equal the size of G. This implies the size of H divides the size of G, proving Lagrange's theorem.
The document proves Lagrange's theorem that the order of any subgroup H of a group G divides the order of the group G. It first shows that the left cosets of H partition G by assuming two cosets have a common element, which leads to a contradiction. It then argues that since the cosets partition G and all have the same size as H, the index of H in G, represented as |G:H|, multiplied by the size of H must equal the size of G. This implies the size of H divides the size of G, proving Lagrange's theorem.
This contradiction g_1∉H Assumption is wrong, then claim is true. *Construction 2 : Pick g_2∈G not in H or g_1 H g_2 H={g_2∙h for all h∈H} H and g_2 H do not overlap g_1 H and g_2 H do not overlap Claim: g_1 H and g_2 H have no element in common Assume there is an element in g_1 H and g_2 H This means g_1∙h_i=g_2∙h_j for some h_i and h_j in H g_1∙h_i=g_2∙h_j (g_1∙h_i )∙〖h_j〗^(-1)=(g_2∙h_j )∙〖h_j〗^(-1) g_1∙(h_i∙〖h_j〗^(-1) )=g_2∙(h_j∙〖h_j〗^(-1) ) g_1∙(h_i∙〖h_j〗^(-1) )=g_2∙e g_1∙(h_i∙〖h_j〗^(-1) )=g_2 g_1∙h_k=g_2 Because g_1∙h_k∈H, so g_2∈g_1 H This contradiction g_2∉g_1 H Assumption is wrong, then claim is true.
G is split into non-overlapping left cosets: H,g_1 H,g_2 H,… ,g_n H
Each coset is the same size Pick a coset gH and suppose it has duplicates g∙h_1=g∙h_2 g^(-1)∙(g∙h_1 )=g^(-1)∙(g∙h_2 ) h_1=h_2 This contradiction Each coset has size |H|=d. G partitioned into cosets |G|=N,|H|=d Let’s call the number of cosets = k Index of H in G=|G:H|=k So d∙k=n⟹d|n This means |H| divides |G| Hence langrange’s theorem is proven. Jdjdjwbjwkskdnwk Hsidbwjdijdme Hdjendjdkekek Bsjskodje Hsjeoodkene Kudune kowe ngerti Tresnoku nomer siji Penak e leh mu blenjani janji Kowe tego nglarani
Usahaku wes ra kurang kurang
Gematiku wes pol polan Pas aku dolan jebul ketemu kowe neng dalan Kowe konangan gendak an
Ngomongo... Jalokmu pie?
Tak turutane , tak usahakne Aku ramasalah... yen kon berjuang dewe Sing penting kowe bahagia endinge
Reff : Nanging ngopo , walesanmu neng aku Kowe luwih milih dek'e Kowe ninggal aku ninggal tatu Kurang opo , nek ku mertahanke kowe Kowe malah ngebot i liane