Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
ID:2090814
The qualitative component of the study will consist of in-depth interviews with key personnel in
the private-sector organizations to explore their experiences and perceptions of conflict within
their workplace. The quantitative component will consist of a survey distributed to a larger
sample of employees from private-sector organizations to measure the frequency, nature, and
impact of conflict on the organization.
The study aims to contribute to the existing literature on organizational conflict by providing a
comprehensive understanding of the effects of conflict on private-sector organizations. The study
will explore how conflicts can lead to reduced productivity, employee dissatisfaction, and
increased turnover rates. Additionally, the study will investigate the role of conflict resolution
strategies and how they can help mitigate the negative effects of conflict.
The findings of the study will be relevant to private-sector organizations, as it will provide
insights into the importance of conflict management and resolution strategies in maintaining a
healthy and productive workplace. The results of the study will also inform policy and practice in
the private sector, as organizations seek to create and maintain a positive work environment for
their employees.
i
Contents
ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................................i
CHAPTER ONE..............................................................................................................................................1
1.0 Research Background..................................................................................................................1
1.1 Problem Statement......................................................................................................................2
1.2 Research Questions.....................................................................................................................2
1.2.0 Main Research Question..........................................................................................................2
1.2.1 Sub-Research Questions..........................................................................................................2
1.3 Research Objectives.....................................................................................................................3
1.3.0 Main Research Objectives........................................................................................................3
1.3.1 Sub Research objectives..........................................................................................................3
1.4 Significance of the Study..............................................................................................................3
1.5 Organization of the Study............................................................................................................4
CHAPTER TWO.............................................................................................................................................5
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................................................5
2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................5
2.2 Definition of Conflicts..................................................................................................................6
2.3 Causes of Conflicts in Organizations............................................................................................6
2.4 Conflict Resolution.......................................................................................................................7
2.5 Conflict Aftermath.......................................................................................................................7
2.6 Types of Conflicts.........................................................................................................................8
2.7 Managing Organizational Conflicts............................................................................................10
2.7.1 Traditional and Modern Approaches to Conflicts..................................................................11
2.7.1.1 Traditional Approach.............................................................................................................11
a) Classicists:......................................................................................................................................12
b) Neoclassicists:................................................................................................................................12
2.7.1.2 Modern Approach..................................................................................................................12
2.8 Strategies for Managing Organizational Conflicts......................................................................13
2.8.1 The Thomas-Kilmann Model..................................................................................................14
2.9 Effects of Conflicts.....................................................................................................................15
2.9.1 Advantages of Organizational conflicts..................................................................................15
2.9.2 Disadvantages of organizational conflicts..............................................................................16
2.10 Conceptual review.....................................................................................................................17
ii
2.10.1 Research Gap.........................................................................................................................19
2.10.2 Research Framework.............................................................................................................19
2.10.3 Research Hypotheses.............................................................................................................19
CHAPTER THREE........................................................................................................................................21
3.0 METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................................21
3.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................21
3.2 Research Design.........................................................................................................................21
3.3 Types of Data.............................................................................................................................21
3.4 Sources of Data..........................................................................................................................22
3.4.1 Interview................................................................................................................................23
3.5 Population of the Study.............................................................................................................23
3.6 Sampling Size and Sampling Procedure.....................................................................................24
3.7 Data Collection Instruments......................................................................................................25
3.8 Method of Data Analysis............................................................................................................26
Summary...............................................................................................................................................27
Recommendations.................................................................................................................................28
Research Questionnaires and Interview Guide......................................................................................29
References.............................................................................................................................................30
iii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Research Background
Conflict is a common phenomenon in organizations, and its effects can have far-reaching
implications. In private-sector organizations, conflicts can arise from various sources, including
disagreements over goals, resource allocation, and interpersonal relationships. Conflicts can have
both positive and negative effects on private-sector organizations, depending on how they are
managed and resolved. Therefore, it is important to examine the effects of conflicts on private-
sector organizations and identify strategies to manage and resolve them effectively.
Previous research has investigated the effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations from
different perspectives. For instance, Jehn and Bendersky (2003) found that task-related conflicts
can increase organizational creativity and innovation. However, if conflicts are not addressed
appropriately, they can lead to negative consequences, such as decreased productivity, low
morale, and high turnover rates. Additionally, studies have shown that conflicts can affect
employees' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention (Krambia-
Kapardis and Zopiatis, 2017).
Effective conflict management and resolution strategies are crucial to mitigating the negative
effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations. Conflict management strategies such as
negotiation, mediation, and arbitration have been identified as effective methods of addressing
conflicts (De Dreu and Gelfand, 2008). Furthermore, conflict resolution training for managers
and employees can improve conflict management and reduce the negative effects of conflicts on
private-sector organizations (Kozan and Ergin, 2013).
Despite the growing body of research on conflicts in private-sector organizations, there is a need
for further research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of conflicts on
these organizations. This study aims to address this gap in the literature by examining the effects
of conflicts on private-sector organizations and identifying strategies to manage and resolve
conflicts effectively.
1
1.1 Problem Statement
The way conflict is handled determines how it affects the organization. When it comes to
managing conflicts, management must put in place proper strategies and policies to deal with or
manage any type of conflict that may arise. Recognizing conflicts sooner is critical because they
are easier to resolve.
First and foremost, we discovered that unwelcomed disputes and bad relationships among
employees produce a less conducive working atmosphere, resulting in a lack of trust and
obstruction in the flow of information and communication within the ranks.
Unwanted competition among employees diminishes productivity, and fewer competing or
disgruntled individuals may result in employee turnover and absenteeism.
Conflict management is critical in every business, and our research shows that conflicts in the
private-sector necessitate firm authority and leadership integrity in resolving them, as they can
destabilize the entire organization's productivity and overall performance if not resolved.
The scope of this study is to establish the effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations.
The question our research seeks to answer is what the effects of conflicts on private-sector
organizations are.
1.2.1 Sub-Research Questions
1. What are the common types of conflicts that arise in private-sector organizations, and
what are their causes?
2. How do conflicts affect the productivity and overall performance of private-sector
organizations, and what are their long-term consequences?
2
3. What are the most effective strategies for managing and resolving conflicts in private-
sector organizations, and how can they be implemented successfully?
The main research objective of our study is to examine the effects of conflicts in private-sector
organizations.
1.3.1 Sub Research objectives
1. To identify the different types of conflicts that occur in private-sector organizations and
their causes.
2. To analyze the effects of conflicts on the productivity and overall performance of private-
sector organizations, as well as their long-term consequences.
3. To determine the most effective strategies for managing and resolving conflicts in
private-sector organizations, and to assess their successful implementation.
Secondly, this study will benefit employees within private-sector organizations by providing
insights into the causes and consequences of conflicts, which will help them to better navigate
and resolve conflicts with their colleagues and managers. This may result in improved job
satisfaction and a more positive work environment.
Thirdly, the study will contribute to the development of conflict management strategies that are
tailored to the needs of private-sector organizations. This will be particularly valuable for small
3
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which may lack the resources to develop their own
conflict management policies and procedures.
Fourthly, the study will help to promote ethical behavior and responsible decision-making within
private-sector organizations. By highlighting the ethical implications of conflicts and proposing
ways to address them in a responsible and sustainable manner, this study will contribute to the
development of a more ethical and socially responsible business environment.
Finally, the study will provide a foundation for future research on conflict management within
private-sector organizations. It will identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest avenues for
further investigation, which will contribute to the ongoing development of conflict management
theory and practice.
4
CHAPTER TWO
Several studies have explored the effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations. For
example, Thomas and Kilmann (2017) found that unresolved conflicts can result in reduced
productivity, low morale, and increased employee turnover. Similarly, De Dreu and Gelfand
(2008) found that relationship conflict, in particular, can lead to negative outcomes such as
biased information-processing and rigid stances, which can impede effective decision-making.
In recent years, there has been growing interest in the development of conflict management
strategies that are tailored to the needs of private-sector organizations. One promising approach
is the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as mediation and arbitration
(Coltri & Shapiro, 2014). These methods can help organizations to resolve conflicts in a timely
and cost-effective manner, while also promoting a culture of collaboration and mutual
understanding.
While there is a growing body of literature on the topic of conflict management in private-sector
organizations, there are still many gaps in our understanding of this complex issue. For example,
there is a need to further explore the impact of conflicts on employee job satisfaction and
turnover rates, as well as the ethical implications of conflicts in the private sector. Additionally,
there is a need for more research on the role of leadership in managing conflicts within private-
sector organizations, as well as the development of effective conflict management policies and
procedures.
This literature review aims to synthesize the existing research on the effects of conflicts on
private-sector organizations and identify key areas for further investigation. By doing so, it will
5
contribute to the ongoing development of conflict management theory and practice, and help to
promote the long-term success and sustainability of private-sector organizations.
In organizational behavior, conflict is defined as "a process in which one party perceives that its
interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party" (Robbins and Judge, 2019, p.
414). According to this definition, conflict involves two or more parties who have opposing
interests or goals that are in some way mutually exclusive. Conflict can arise from various
sources, such as differences in personality, values, or goals, or from situational factors such as
scarce resources or unclear roles and responsibilities (De Wit, Jehn, & Scheepers, 2013).
In summary, conflicts are complex and multifaceted phenomena that can arise from a variety of
sources, and can have different effects on individuals and organizations. Understanding the
nature of conflicts and their effects is crucial for organizations to effectively manage conflicts
and achieve their goals.
1. Differences in values, beliefs, and attitudes: People have different values, beliefs, and
attitudes based on their personal experiences, cultural background, and education. These
differences can lead to conflicts when people are unable to find common ground and
work towards a shared goal (Robbins and Judge, 2019).
2. Scarce resources: Organizations have limited resources, and when employees compete
for these resources, it can result in conflicts. For example, conflicts can arise when
6
employees compete for promotion, bonuses, or other benefits (De Wit, Jehn, &
Scheepers, 2013).
3. Power struggles: Power struggles can occur when employees compete for control over
resources, decision-making, or other aspects of their work. These struggles can result in
conflicts, particularly when employees feel that their interests are being threatened (Jehn,
1995).
4. Poor communication: Inadequate communication or miscommunication can lead to
misunderstandings, which can result in conflicts. Poor communication can occur due to
language barriers, cultural differences, or lack of information (De Wit, Jehn, &
Scheepers, 2013).
5. Unclear roles and responsibilities: Conflicts can arise when employees are unclear
about their roles and responsibilities or when roles overlap. This can result in confusion
and misunderstandings about who is responsible for what (Robbins and Judge, 2019).
Ivancevich and Matteson divided conflict into two types: Functional and Dysfunctional.
They defined functional conflicts as a conflict between groups that improves and benefits the
performance of the organization. Functional conflict is a healthy form of conflict that occurs
when two or more people disagree constructively. Functional conflict increases decision-making
quality, promotes creativity and innovation, and piques group members' attention and curiosity.
Everyone can learn the art of harmonious and efficient compromise through functional conflict.
Dysfunctional conflict is a type of conflict that causes a group's communication or performance
to deteriorate over time. Dysfunctional conflict is defined as a lack of sufficient motivating
conflict. In most cases, dysfunctional conflict in the workplace is caused by the egos of
individuals with opposing goals. Employee burnout and higher levels of stress are common
results. Employees are less satisfied and loyal to the company as a result of this.
Interpersonal conflict: This is a conflict that occurs between individuals. It may arise due to
differences in opinions, values, or interests. (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014)
The causes that lead to this conflict are personality differences, perceptions (experiences,
education, backgrounds and education), clashes of values and interests, power and status
8
differences, lack of information, role, incompatibility, stress and scare resources (Whetten &
Cameron, 2012)
Intrapersonal conflict: This is a conflict that occurs within an individual, such as a conflict
between their thoughts, beliefs, or emotions. (Deutsch, 2006)
Goal conflicts exist within an individual when their behaviors and attitudes have compatible
elements or lead to both positive and negative outcomes which are mutually exclusive. Some
basic elements which causes conflicts within individuals include incompatibility,
unacceptability, uncertainty, frustration, goal conflict and role conflict (Evans, 2013).
Inter-group conflict: This is a conflict that occurs between different groups, such as between
different ethnic or religious groups. It may arise due to differences in beliefs, values, or interests.
(Sherif et al., 1961). These groups may have a wide range of interests and may be unwilling to
freely share information. Members of one group may have conflicts with members of other
groups. Conflicts arise between different groups in an organization each seeking to accomplish
their objectives, are called inter-group conflicts. Organizations are composed of interlocking
networks of sections, work teams, departments, individuals, departments or groups.
Intra-Groups Conflict: Managers or leaders may take disciplinary actions toward group
members, thus leading to conflicts with the group, which subsequently causes a decrease in the
entire productivity of the organization. Intra-group conflict may also happen if there are
disagreements among members of the same group (Chand, 2015).
Conflicts of this nature occur within and between organizations, teams, or departments and
members within a committee. The marketing department may face disagreements about the
deployment of resources made available to it.
Organizational conflict: This is a conflict that occurs within an organization, such as between
employees or between different departments. It may arise due to competition for resources or
power struggles. (Robbins & Judge, 2017)
9
Inter-Organizational Conflict: This form of conflict arises between groups; for example, an
organization whose aim is to conserve and protect wild life may clash with developers who argue
that significant portions of wilderness must be cleared in order to develop properties. As one
could anticipate, Businesses that compete in the same markets frequently engage in inter-
organizational conflict. In the competitiveness and rivalry that characterizes firms operating in
the same market, inter-organizational conflicts arise. It also happens between unions and the
companies that employ their members, between government regulatory bodies and the
companies that are under their scrutiny, and between companies and raw material suppliers.
The practice of recognizing and dealing with disputes in a rational, balanced and effective way.
Conflict management implemented within a business environment usually involves effective
communication, problem resolving abilities and good negotiating skills to restore the focus to the
company’s overall goals (Business Dictionary)
The diagnosis of the causes and elements of conflicts at the interpersonal, intragroup, and
intergroup levels, as well as the strategies used to resolve these conflicts, are all part of conflict
management. A diagnostic should specify whether or not an intervention is required, as well as
the type of intervention required. Be aware of and respectful of differences by avoiding
disrespectful words. In this way problems can be resolved faster (Segel & Smith, 2011).
The cooperating theory, which believes that people should air their differences and cooperate
toward mutually satisfying solutions, is one way to resolve conflict. Collaboration necessitates
10
that each organization member be interdependent, capable of communicating, and sufficiently
devoted to the organization to justify the time and energy spent developing and maintaining
mutually beneficial connections.
Traditional approaches to conflict resolution often involve the use of mediation or negotiation to
find a mutually acceptable solution. In many traditional societies, elders or respected members of
the community may act as mediators to help resolve conflicts between individuals or groups. The
focus of traditional approaches is often on preserving relationships and maintaining harmony
within the community.
a) Classicists:
This strategy is based on popular opinion.
Classicists believe that these approaches might be purposely attained by a well-defined authority
structure, as well as the responsibility and accountability of the hierarchy's involved individuals.
b) Neoclassicists:
This is the classic method, which focuses on the psychology of the individual.
11
Understanding the psychology and behavioral pattern of an individual.
Fostering and fostering participatory leadership in an informal setting.
Prevent individual unhappiness and promote organizational harmony.
Informal groupings should be encouraged to make up for official organization's
shortcomings.
Job enrichment and expansion in an organization might affect individual and group job
satisfaction.
They also believe that a participatory democratic approach to decision-making can help a
system succeed.
On the other hand, modern approaches to conflict resolution may involve the use of legal
systems, arbitration, or even military force to resolve conflicts. Modern approaches tend to
prioritize individual rights and may be more focused on achieving a legally binding agreement
rather than maintaining relationships.
Both traditional and modern approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of
approach may depend on the specific situation and context of the conflict.
12
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in alternative dispute resolution methods,
which seek to find a middle ground between traditional and modern approaches. These methods
may include techniques such as restorative justice, which focuses on repairing relationships and
addressing the underlying causes of conflicts, or collaborative problem-solving, which involves
working together to find creative solutions to complex problems.
Ultimately, the key to effective conflict resolution is to choose an approach that is appropriate for
the specific situation and to be open to different perspectives and solutions.
1) Identify the source of the conflict: The first step in managing a conflict is to identify its
source. This can be achieved by listening to all parties involved and understanding their
perspectives.
2) Encourage open communication: Encourage open communication among the parties
involved in the conflict. This can help to clarify misunderstandings and promote
understanding.
3) Focus on interests, not positions: Help the parties involved in the conflict to identify
their underlying interests, rather than focusing solely on their positions. By doing so, it
may be possible to find a solution that satisfies everyone's interests.
4) Explore multiple options: Encourage the parties involved in the conflict to explore
multiple options for resolving the conflict. This can help to identify creative solutions that
may not have been considered otherwise.
5) Seek a win-win solution: Try to find a solution that satisfies the interests of all parties
involved in the conflict. This can help to build trust and promote a positive working
relationship.
6) Encourage compromise: Encourage the parties involved in the conflict to compromise
on certain issues, in order to find a solution that works for everyone.
7) Mediation: If the conflict is particularly complex or difficult to resolve, consider
bringing in a neutral third party to mediate the dispute.
13
8) Follow-up: Once a solution has been agreed upon, follow-up with all parties involved to
ensure that the resolution is being implemented and that everyone is satisfied with the
outcome.
Competing: This approach involves a high degree of assertiveness and a low degree of
cooperation. It is often used when one party is trying to win at all costs, and may involve
the use of power, threats, or aggression.
Collaborating: This approach involves a high degree of both assertiveness and
cooperation. It is used when both parties are interested in finding a solution that satisfies
everyone's interests, and may involve brainstorming, active listening, and creative
problem-solving.
Compromising: This approach involves a moderate degree of both assertiveness and
cooperation. It is used when both parties are willing to give up something in order to
reach a solution that is acceptable to everyone.
Avoiding: This approach involves a low degree of both assertiveness and cooperation. It
is used when one or both parties are not willing or able to address the conflict, and may
involve withdrawal, denial, or postponement.
Accommodating: This approach involves a low degree of assertiveness and a high
degree of cooperation. It is used when one party is willing to give up something in order
to maintain the relationship with the other party, and may involve conceding, smoothing
over differences, or making a sacrifice.
The Thomas-Kilmann Model can be a useful tool for individuals and organizations to better
understand their own conflict resolution styles, as well as the styles of others, in order to work
more effectively together and resolve conflicts in a constructive manner.
14
2.9 Effects of Conflicts
Conflicts in organizations can have significant effects on the individuals involved, the team, and
the organization as a whole. Here are some examples with in-text citations and references:
1) Promoting creativity and innovation: Conflicts can lead to the exchange of diverse
perspectives and ideas, which can stimulate creative thinking and innovative solutions
(Amabile, 1998). This can help organizations to adapt to changing environments and stay
competitive.
2) Encouraging critical thinking: Conflicts can also encourage individuals to think
critically about their own beliefs and assumptions, as well as those of others (Rahim,
2010). This can lead to a deeper understanding of issues and more informed decision-
making.
3) Improving relationships: Resolving conflicts can lead to improved relationships
between individuals and teams (Deutsch, 1973). This can foster trust and collaboration,
leading to improved communication and better outcomes.
4) Facilitating growth and development: Conflicts can provide opportunities for
individuals and teams to learn and grow from their experiences (Lewicki et al., 2015). By
engaging in conflict, individuals can develop new skills and strategies for handling
similar situations in the future.
It's important to note that these advantages are only possible if conflicts are managed effectively.
If conflicts are left unresolved or are managed poorly, the negative consequences are likely to
outweigh any potential advantages.
15
2.9.2 Disadvantages of organizational conflicts
16
strategies and policies to deal with or manage any type of conflict that may arise (De Wit, Jehn,
& Scheepers, 2013).
On the other hand, some studies have shown that conflicts can have positive effects on private-
sector organizations. For instance, conflicts can lead to improved decision-making processes,
increased creativity, and innovation (Rahim, 2017). Conflicts can also lead to the development of
new ideas and solutions to problems, which can enhance the organization's performance (Katz &
Kahn, 1978).
Therefore, this study seeks to examine the effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations,
including both the negative and positive effects. The study will also explore the different
strategies and policies that organizations can use to manage conflicts effectively. This study is
essential because it will provide insights that can help organizations to understand the impact of
conflicts on their performance and develop effective conflict management strategies to enhance
their overall performance.
One way to conceptualize the effects of conflicts on private-sector organizations is through the
lens of organizational behavior theory. Organizational behavior is the study of how people
behave in organizations, including how they interact with each other, make decisions, and
respond to different situations. In the context of conflicts, organizational behavior theory can
help us understand how conflicts emerge, how they affect individuals and groups, and how they
can be managed effectively.
One theoretical framework that has been used to study conflicts in organizations is the conflict
management styles framework. This framework proposes five different styles that individuals
and organizations can use to manage conflicts: avoiding, accommodating, compromising,
17
collaborating, and competing. Each style has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of
style can depend on various factors, such as the nature and severity of the conflict, the parties
involved, and the organizational culture.
Another theoretical perspective that has been used to study conflicts in organizations is the social
identity theory. This theory proposes that individuals form their identity based on their
membership in different social groups, such as work teams, departments, or organizations.
Conflicts can arise when individuals perceive a threat to their social identity or when they feel
that their group is being unfairly treated. Social identity theory can help us understand how
conflicts can be shaped by social factors, such as group dynamics, intergroup relations, and
power differentials.
A third theoretical perspective that can inform our understanding of the effects of conflicts on
private-sector organizations is the emotional intelligence theory. This theory proposes that
individuals' ability to perceive, understand, and manage their own and others' emotions can
influence their behavior and decision-making in conflicts. Emotional intelligence can help
individuals and organizations to manage conflicts more effectively by reducing the negative
emotions associated with conflicts, improving communication and collaboration, and promoting
empathy and understanding.
is a need to explore how private sector organizations can leverage the positive outcomes of
strategies.
18
Mediating variables: Organizational culture and leadership styles.
performance.
performance.
Hypothesis 4: The choice of conflict management strategy positively affects private sector
organizations' performance.
Hypothesis 5: Organizational culture and leadership styles mediate the relationship between
19
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter discusses the methodology used to collect data, including the study's demographic,
sample size, and sampling procedure. It also covers the research design, which includes sample
techniques and the rationale for selecting the study region, sources, and data kinds, and
concludes with data limitations.
Quantitative data: This type of data is numerical and can be analyzed using statistical methods.
In this study, quantitative data will be collected through a self-administered survey that includes
demographic questions, questions related to conflict management strategies (measured using the
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument), and questions related to organizational
performance (measured based on the organization's financial performance and employee
satisfaction). The data collected will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
20
Qualitative data: This type of data is non-numerical and provides more in-depth insights into
participants' experiences and perspectives. In this study, qualitative data will be collected through
follow-up interviews with a sample of participants. The interviews will be transcribed and
analyzed thematically to gain a deeper understanding of participants' experiences with conflict
management and its impact on organizational performance.
Using both quantitative and qualitative data will provide a more comprehensive understanding of
the relationship between conflict management strategies and organizational performance. The
quantitative data will provide a numerical measure of conflict management strategies and
organizational performance, while the qualitative data will provide more detailed information on
participants' experiences and perspectives. The use of both types of data will also help to
triangulate the findings and increase the validity and reliability of the study.
Primary data: Primary data will be collected directly from the participants of the study using a
self-administered questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The questionnaire will be designed to
collect data on demographic information, conflict management strategies, and organizational
performance. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument will be used to measure conflict
management strategies. The interviews will be used to gain a deeper understanding of
participants' experiences and perspectives on conflict management and organizational
performance.
Secondary data: Secondary data will be collected from published research articles, books,
reports, and other relevant sources related to conflict management and organizational
performance. This data will be used to support the study's findings and to provide a contextual
background for the research.
The primary data collection will be conducted by the researcher and will involve selecting a
random sample of participants from various organizations in different industries. The secondary
data will be collected through a systematic search of relevant databases, such as Google Scholar,
21
JSTOR, and EBSCO. The sources of the data will be carefully evaluated to ensure their
relevance and credibility to the study.
3.4.1 Interview
Interviews will be used as a method of collecting qualitative data to gain a deeper understanding
of participants' experiences and perspectives on conflict management strategies and
organizational performance. The interviews will be conducted with a sample of participants who
completed the survey.
The interviews will be semi-structured, which means that there will be a pre-defined set of
questions, but the interviewer will also have the flexibility to ask follow-up questions based on
the participants' responses. The questions will be designed to explore participants' experiences
with conflict management, their perceptions of how conflict is managed in their organizations,
and the impact of conflict management strategies on organizational performance.
The interviews will be conducted in-person, over the phone, or online, depending on the
participants' preferences. The interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for
analysis.
The data collected from the interviews will be analyzed thematically. This involves identifying
patterns, categories, and themes that emerge from the data. The themes will be organized and
summarized in a report, along with quotes from participants to illustrate the themes.
The interview data will be triangulated with the survey data to provide a more comprehensive
understanding of the relationship between conflict management strategies and organizational
performance. The qualitative data from the interviews will provide rich, in-depth insights into
participants' experiences and perspectives that cannot be obtained through the quantitative data
alone.
22
In order to be eligible for the study, participants must meet the following criteria:
The population will be further narrowed down based on the following characteristics:
Gender: The study will aim to include an equal number of male and female participants to
ensure gender balance.
Age: Participants will be between the ages of 18 and 65 years old to ensure a diverse range of
ages.
Education level: Participants will have a minimum of a high school diploma or equivalent to
ensure a certain level of education and comprehension of the survey and interview questions.
Job level: Participants will include employees at different job levels within the organization,
including entry-level, mid-level, and senior-level positions.
A sample size calculation will be conducted to determine the appropriate sample size for the
study based on the population size and the desired level of precision. The sample size will be
sufficient to ensure statistical power and generalizability of the results.
The sampling procedure will involve a two-stage sampling process. In the first stage, a random
sample of organizations will be selected from different industries. The sample of organizations
will be selected using a probability sampling technique such as stratified random sampling or
simple random sampling.
23
In the second stage, a random sample of employees will be selected from each selected
organization. The sample of employees will be selected using a probability sampling technique
such as simple random sampling or systematic random sampling. The selection of employees
will be stratified by job level to ensure a diverse range of participants at different job levels.
The selected employees will be invited to participate in the study by completing a self-
administered questionnaire. Participants who complete the questionnaire will be asked to provide
their contact information if they are interested in participating in a follow-up interview.
A purposive sampling technique will be used to select participants for the interviews.
Participants will be selected based on their responses to the questionnaire to ensure a diverse
range of perspectives on conflict management strategies and organizational performance.
The sampling procedure will be designed to ensure representativeness and generalizability of the
results while also ensuring a diverse range of participants with different experiences and
perspectives.
Interview guide: A semi-structured interview guide will be used to collect qualitative data from
a sample of participants who completed the survey questionnaire. The interview guide will be
designed to explore participants' experiences with conflict management strategies, their
perceptions of how conflict is managed in their organizations, and the impact of conflict
management strategies on organizational performance. The interview guide will consist of a set
24
of open-ended questions that will allow participants to provide detailed responses to questions
related to their experiences and perspectives.
Both the survey questionnaire and the interview guide will be designed based on the research
questions and objectives of the study. The survey questionnaire will be pre-tested with a small
sample of participants to ensure the validity and reliability of the questions. The interview guide
will be pilot-tested with a small sample of participants to ensure that the questions are clear and
effective in eliciting the desired responses.
The data collected from the survey questionnaire and the interviews will be analyzed separately
using appropriate quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques. The findings from the two
sources of data will be triangulated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the
relationship between conflict management strategies and organizational performance.
25
experiences and perspectives on conflict management strategies and organizational
performance.
4) Triangulation: Triangulation will be used to combine the findings from the quantitative
and qualitative data sources to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the
relationship between conflict management strategies and organizational performance.
The findings from the two sources of data will be compared and contrasted to identify
areas of agreement and disagreement.
The data analysis will be conducted using appropriate statistical software such as SPSS or R for
quantitative data and NVivo or Atlas.ti for qualitative data. The data analysis will be conducted
in a systematic and rigorous manner to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings. The
results of the data analysis will be presented in tables, charts, and narratives to provide a clear
and concise summary of the findings.
Summary
The research topic is the effects of conflicts in private sector organizations. The study aims to
investigate the impact of conflicts on the performance of private sector organizations and
identify the causes and sources of conflicts in these organizations.
The study will use a mixed-methods research design, including a survey questionnaire and semi-
structured interviews, to collect data from a sample of employees in private sector organizations.
The data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data and
thematic analysis for qualitative data.
The study is important because conflicts can have a significant negative impact on the
performance of private sector organizations, including decreased productivity, low morale, high
turnover rates, and financial losses. Effective conflict management strategies can mitigate the
negative effects of conflicts and improve the performance of organizations.
The findings of the study can be used to develop effective conflict management policies and
practices in private sector organizations, promote a positive work environment, and increase
employee satisfaction and retention. The study can also contribute to the existing literature on
conflicts in organizations and provide insights for future research in this area.
26
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study on "Examining the Effects of Conflicts on Private Sector
Organizations," the following recommendations can be made:
1. Develop and implement conflict resolution policies: Private sector organizations should
establish and implement clear conflict resolution policies and procedures to manage
conflicts effectively. These policies should be communicated to all employees and should
provide guidance on how to address conflicts.
2. Provide conflict management training: Organizations should offer training on conflict
management to their employees. This training should include skills such as effective
communication, negotiation, mediation, and conflict resolution.
3. Foster a positive work culture: A positive work culture that emphasizes collaboration,
open communication, and respect for diversity can reduce the likelihood of conflicts
arising in the workplace. Private sector organizations should strive to foster such a culture
within their workplaces.
4. Address conflicts promptly: It is crucial to address conflicts as soon as they arise to
prevent them from escalating and causing further damage. Organizations should have a
process for identifying and resolving conflicts promptly.
5. Evaluate conflict resolution strategies: Organizations should evaluate the effectiveness of
their conflict resolution strategies regularly. This evaluation should include feedback
from employees and an analysis of the outcomes of conflicts that have been resolved.
By following these recommendations, private sector organizations can manage conflicts more
effectively and minimize their negative impact on productivity, job satisfaction, and overall
performance.
27
Research Questionnaires and Interview Guide.
Research Questionnaire
1. Can you describe a conflict that you have experienced or witnessed in your workplace?
2. How did the conflict affect you and your colleagues?
3. What was the main cause of the conflict?
4. How was the conflict resolved?
5. Have you noticed any patterns in the types of conflicts that occur in your workplace?
28
6. How do conflicts affect the overall work environment and productivity?
7. In your opinion, what measures can be taken to minimize conflicts in the workplace?
8. Can you describe the role that management plays in managing conflicts?
9. Have you noticed any changes in the organizational culture after a conflict has occurred?
10. How do conflicts affect employee retention and job satisfaction?
References
29
Jehn, K.A. and Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: a contingency
perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 187-
242.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd Ed.). Wiley.
Khandekar, A., & Sharma, S. K. (2017). Study of workplace conflict and its management in
selected organizations in Mumbai region. International Journal of Management and Social
Sciences Research, 6(10), 1-13.
Khan, M. A., Nawaz, M. M., Mahmood, K., & Khan, A. (2021). The impact of workplace
conflict on employee performance in the private sector of Pakistan. Journal of Business and
Economics Review, 6(1), 1-12.
Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts, Skills & Best
Practices. New York: The McGraw -Hill Companies, 16-17.
Kozan, M.K. and Ergin, C. (2013). The effect of conflict resolution training on employees'
perception of organizational justice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99: 44-52.
Krambia-Kapardis, M. and Zopiatis, A. (2017). Conflict management and employee job
satisfaction in the service industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 29(2): 820-839.
Lederach, J. P. (2015). The moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. Oxford
University Press.
Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd Ed.).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 12(2), 296-320.
Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge.
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution (3rd
Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th Ed.). Pearson.
Segal, Jeanne & Smith, Melinda (2011). Conflict Resolution Skills. Retrieved February 25, 2012,
from http://www.helpguide.org/mental/eq8_conflict_resolution.htm
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict
and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book
Exchange.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2017). Five conflict management styles at a glance.
Retrieved from https://www.kilmann.com/five-conflict-management-styles-at-a-glance/
30
Wall, J. A., Callister, R. R., & Ruble, T. L. (2018). Conflict in organizations: Beyond
effectiveness and performance. In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice
(3rd Ed.) (pp. 157-178). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Whetten, David A., & Cameron, Kim S. (2012). Managing Power and Conflict in the Workplace.
Introduction to International Organizational Behavior.
31