Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, 1976
INTRODUCTION
1Department of Psychology, Trenton State College, Trenton, New Jersey. Received his Ph.D.
from SUNY/Buffalo. Recent research has been mainly concerned with the development of
ego identity and with techniques for resolving identity crises.
2Department of Psychology, Hartwick CoUege, Oneonta, New York. Received his Ph.D.
from Syracuse University. Recent research has been mainly concerned with personality
moderators of human judgment.
361
9 1 9 7 6 P l e n u m P u b l i s h i n g C o r p o r a t i o n , 2 2 7 West 1 7 t h Street, New Y o r k , N . Y . 1 0 0 1 1 . N o
part of this publication may be r6produced, stored in a retrieval s y s t e m , o r transmitted, in
any f o r m o r b y a n y means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording,
o r otherwise, without written permission o f the publisher.
362 Waterman and Goldman
stage-specific crisis involves developing a stable sense of ego identity and the
relevant bipolar continuum is termed "identity vs. identity diffusion."
The college years are generally viewed as a time of major change in ego
identity. There is an extensive research literature describing the changes charac-
teristically occurring during the undergraduate years in the content of identity
elements in such areas as occupational choice, religious beliefs, and political
ideology (see Feldman and Newcomb, 1969). From the perspective of Erikson's
theory, there is concern not only for the content of particular identity elements
but also for the processes by which such elements are formed.
The processes involved in the development of ego identity are the basis of
a four-category hierarchical classification system for identity devised by Marcia
(1966). The four ego identity statuses are defined in terms of two dimensions:
crisis and commitment. "Crisis" refers to a period of active questioning during
which potential identity elements are critically evaluated. There may be extensive
testing out of a variety of alternative possibilities. "Commitment" involves
making a firm, unwavering investment in specific identity elements and engaging
in significant activity directed toward the implementation of one's chosen identity.
A person in the identity achiever status has gone through a period of
crisis and has developed relatively firm commitments. The moratorium status is
one in which the individual is undergoing an identity crisis and is striving to form
personally meaningful commitments. A person is classified as a foreclosure if
there has not been a crisis but there are, nevertheless, commitments regarding
occupational choice and/or ideological beliefs. The commitments which have
been made are generally ones which reflect the expectations of parents or other
authority figures. The identity diffusion category is one in which the individual
is not committed to anything and is not actively trying to make a commitment.
A person in this group may never have been in crisis or may have had a period of
questioning but was not able to resolve it and emerged without making a firm
choice.
Several studies, using a variety of paper-and-pencil measures, have dem.
onstrated an increasing sense of ego identity with age or year in college (Dignan,
1965; Constantinople, 1969; Joyce, 1971; Fry, 1974). Only one previous study
has reported the pattern of changes in the four ego identity statuses during the
college years (Waterman and Waterman, 1971, 1972; Waterman et al., 1974).
During the freshman year, male engineering students enrolled at Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute showed an increase in occupational identity crises while
there was an increase in the frequency of identity diffusions regarding ideological
identity (a combination of religious and political beliefs). From the end of the
freshman year to the end of the senior year there was an increase in the frequency
of identity achievers for both occupational and ideological identity.
In view of the distinctive nature of the student sample participating in
the earlier study, it was considered important to assess whether liberal arts
students would follow a similar pattern of development. Such extensions are
Identity Development at a Liberal Arts College 363
METHOD
Participants
Procedure
The first interview with each student was conducted during the initial 5
weeks of the fall term of the freshman year. The senior year interview was con-
ducted during the latter half of the senior year. In addition to the interviews,
the students had completed the College Student Questionnaire-Part 1 prior to
the start of their freshman year.
RESULTS
The number of students in each of the four ego identity statuses in the
three interview areas both as freshmen and as seniors is presented in Table I.
Identity Development at a Liberal Arts College 365
Table I. Number of Participants in Each Ego Identity Status and Number of Par-
ticipants Changing out of and into Each Status from the Freshman to the Senior Year
Freshman Senior Changed out Changed
Status year year of status into status X2
Occupational choice
Identity achiever 5 22 1 18 13.48 d
Moratorium 13 2 13 2 6.67 c
Foreclosure 16 19 6 9 <1
Identity diffusion 20 11 14 5 3.24 a
Religious beliefs
Identity achiever 13 17 6 10 <1
Moratorium 6 7 5 6 <1
Foreclosure 19 9 12 2 5.78 b
Identity diffusion 14 19 6 11 <1
Political beliefs
Identity achiever 13 14 7 8 <1
Moratorium 2 2 2 2 <1
Foreclosure 8 8 6 6 ~1
Identity diffusion 26 25 10 9 <1
ap < 0.10.
bp < 0.05.
~p<< 0.001.
0.01.
The number o f freshmen changing out o f and into each category is also given.
To assess changes in the overall frequency o f the various statuses, each
student was given a score for each o f the four identity statuses corresponding
to the number of interview areas for which the student was in a particular status.
Since there were three interview areas, the highest possible score for a given
status was 3, the lowest score was 0. Paired-measure t tests were employed to
test for changes in the frequency o f use o f each status from the freshman to the
senior year. A significant overall increase in the frequency of the identity achiever
status during the college years was observed, t(58) = 2.64, p < 0.02. None o f
the other statuses showed an overall significant change.
McNemar tests for the significance o f changes (Siegel, 1956) were used to
identify the pattern of changes within each interview area. F o r occupational
choice, there was a significant increase in the frequency of the identity achiever
status, • = 13.48, p < 0.001, and a significant decrease in the frequency o f
moratoriums, • = 6.67, p < 0.01. The decrease in the frequency of identity
diffusions approached significance, • = 3.24, p < 0.10. With regard to
religion, there was a significant decrease in the number o f foreclosures, X2(1) =
5.78, p < 0.05. No significant changes were found with respect to political
ideology.
366 Wat~man and Goldman
cedents to becoming an achiever, the sample was divided into three groups: (1)
students who were achievers in at least one area both as freshmen and as seniors,
(2) students who were not in the achiever category as freshmen but who became
achievers in at least one area by their senior year, and (3) students who were not
achievers in any area either as freshmen or as seniors. These groups were com-
pared regarding their entrance scores on the five scales of the College Student
Questionnaire-Part 1.
Analyses of variance comparing the three groups on the various scales
yielded significant differences on two of the five scales: Social Conscience and
Cultural Sophistication,/7(2,38) = 3.56, p < 0.05, and F(2,38) = 10.76, p < 0.01,
respectively. For both scales, the group that was achievers on both occasions
scored highest while the group that was not achievers on either occasion scored
lowest. The critical comparison regarding an antecedent of developmental change
is that between the group not in the achiever status at entrance but who became
achievers and the group not in the achiever status on either occasion. This com-
parison was significant only for the Cultural Sophistication variable. Students
who were to become identity achievers expressed significantly more interest in
various literary and art forms at the time of entering college than did the students
who did not subsequently become achievers, t(25) = 2.30, p < 0.05.
DISCUSSION
The results obtained here provide support for Erikson's views on ego
identity development. There was a clear, progressive developmental change, with
students moving through the moratorium status to become identity achievers. A
substantial majority of the identity crises experienced in college were successfully
resolved. The majority of college students leave college with their sense of
identity relatively well established. Over half of the seniors were committed to
their identity elements in at least two of the three areas studied (i.e., they were
either achievers or foreclosures). However, about one-quarter of the seniors were
diffuse in at least two of the three areas. It should be noted that these findings
apply only to students who stayed at the school until the end of their senior
year. The pattern of identity development among students withdrawing from
college remains a matter for conjecture.
The design of the present study was parallel in most respects to the Rens-
selaer study, permitting a comparison of the patterns of ego identity develop.
ment. 3 The pattern of changes for the liberal arts and engineering students was
generally very similar. For both samples, there was a significant overall increase
3The results of the Rensselaer study used for comparison have not previously been reported
in the form used here. Copies of the relevant tables and analyses are available from the
authors on request.
368 Waterman and Goldman
REFERENCES