Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non-performing loans (NPLs) pose a significant threat to the stability and growth of banks.
Bangladesh's banking sector is not immune to this challenge, and it requires effective strategies
to arrest the rising trend of NPLs. The banking sector in Bangladesh has faced challenges with
non-performing loans in recent years.
Several factors contribute to the rise in NPLs, including weak loan recovery mechanisms,
inadequate credit risk assessment, poor governance, and economic downturns. These NPLs can
adversely impact banks' financial health, profitability, and overall stability. Addressing the issue
of NPLs is crucial for the stability and growth of Bangladesh's banking sector. Efforts are being
made to improve risk management practices, enhance corporate governance, and strengthen the
legal framework for loan recovery. Additionally, initiatives are being taken to promote financial
literacy, encourage responsible borrowing and lending practices, and foster an environment
conducive to sustainable economic growth.
To address the issue of NPLs, the government and the central bank of Bangladesh, the
Bangladesh Bank, have implemented various measures. These include introducing stricter loan
classification and provisioning norms, establishing specialized loan recovery tribunals,
encouraging loan rescheduling and restructuring programs, and enhancing supervisory oversight
of banks' loan portfolios.
By effectively managing non-performing loans, banks can ensure the efficient allocation of
capital, maintain financial soundness, and support the overall development of the economy.
☞ Excessive interest rate, many other service charges and some secluded charges raised the
number of installments of borrowers that kicked in as the key factor to loan default.
☞ The failure of banks to provide the loans to the borrowers within the stipulated time. Relying
on banks’ commitment borrowers invested partially in the business/project before getting bank
loans and finally they incurred large amounts of loss due to the lack of timely finance.
☞ When the borrowers were defaulted because of loss in business, banks denied lengthening the
current loan or granting a new loan. As a result, borrowers couldn’t escape from the difficulties,
hardly keeping up the businesses amiably and failing to repay the loans on time.
☞ Borrowers claimed that many things were not clarified to them like upward adjustment of
interest rate, imposition of different charges etc. Also, borrowers did not give due focus to that
part since they stayed busy getting the loan, without knowing the loan conditions appropriately.
☞ In other cases, depending only on the personal relationship, bank managers sanctioned loans
without adequate collateral and proper analysis of business. In many of these cases, improper
documentation causes the loans to default.
☞ Some clients divert their funds for other activities as they face no proper monitoring.
☞ Sometimes, the ignorance of bank officials in the assessment of the necessity of loans leads to
loan default.
☞ The greed of bankers is also liable for making a vulnerable banking sector to some extent by
disbursing loans to risky clients.
Reasons of NPL from Clients’ side:
☞ There are some habitual defaulters who are actually willfully providing wrong information to
take loans from banks without any intention of repayment. Because of imperfect information,
very often banks failed to properly identify this class of people.
☞ Financial illiteracy of many clients causes their loans to default. They usually own small
businesses and have no idea of the pros and cons of banking operations.
☞ Fund diversion is one of the root causes of the creation of NPL. In such instances,
management diversified the fund and their business. One type of mentionable fund diversion is
sharing market investment from business money. Also, funds are diverted for medical purposes,
family affairs, repaying loans taken from various sources, house building, and other businesses
etc.
☞ The installment size is too big or rescheduling period too small for borrowers to avail
conditions for rescheduling.
☞ Due to sales on credit, in many cases, small businessmen face losses in businesses. When they
fail to run businesses, they fail to recover the money from the debtors in due time (or totally
unrecovered).
☞ In other states, borrowers use the bank-disbursed working capital for buying fixed assets.
rather than starting businesses. Eventually, the loan becomes defaulted because of this.
Conclusions:
Mitigating the rising trend of non-performing loans is crucial for the stability and growth of the
banking sector in Bangladesh. Implementing proactive risk management practices, enhancing
loan recovery mechanisms, investing in capacity building, and enforcing robust regulatory
measures are key strategies to address this issue effectively. Addressing the challenge of rising
non-performing loans in Bangladesh's banking sector requires a context-specific approach that
takes into account the unique characteristics of the local market. By implementing these
strategies and collaborating with the Bangladesh Bank and other stakeholders, banks can
mitigate non-performing loan risks, contribute to financial stability, and support sustainable
economic growth in Bangladesh.