You are on page 1of 6

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory

Investigation

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iclb20

Lactate/albumin ratio is more effective than


lactate or albumin alone in predicting clinical
outcomes in intensive care patients with sepsis

Esra Cakir & Isil Ozkocak Turan

To cite this article: Esra Cakir & Isil Ozkocak Turan (2021) Lactate/albumin ratio is more
effective than lactate or albumin alone in predicting clinical outcomes in intensive care patients
with sepsis, Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 81:3, 225-229, DOI:
10.1080/00365513.2021.1901306

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2021.1901306

Published online: 20 Mar 2021.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 29

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iclb20
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
2021, VOL. 81, NO. 3, 225–229
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2021.1901306

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Lactate/albumin ratio is more effective than lactate or albumin alone in


predicting clinical outcomes in intensive care patients with sepsis
Esra Cakir and Isil Ozkocak Turan
Department of Anesthesiology and Clinical of Critical Care, Health Sciences University, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital,
Ankara, Turkey

ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY


This study aimed to compare the value of lactate, albumin, and lactate/albumin ratio for the prediction Received 23 December 2020
of mortality in sepsis patients. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to sepsis between Revised 1 February 2021
January 2016 and January 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Lactate, albumin, and lactate/albumin Accepted 7 March 2021
ratio values were compared between surviving and non-surviving patients and their predictive value
KEYWORDS
for mortality was evaluated. A total of 1136 sepsis patients admitted to the ICU were included in the Albumin; lactic acid; lactate/
study. The mortality rate was 42.7% (485/1136 patients). In ROC analysis for mortality prediction, albumin ratio; sepsis;
the area under the curve and optimal cut-off values were 0.816 and >2.2 mmol/L for lactate, 0.812 intensive care
and 26 g/L for albumin, and 0.869 and >0.71 for lactate/albumin ratio, respectively. Our analysis of units; mortality
lactate, albumin, and lactate/albumin ratio in the largest patient sample to date showed that lactate/
albumin ratio was a stronger parameter than lactate or albumin alone in predicting mortality among
sepsis patients in the ICU. Lactate/albumin ratio is an easily obtained parameter with potential value
for critically ill patients.

Introduction also be affected by inflammatory events such as sepsis [4].


Although lactate is an important parameter in patients with
Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes
severe sepsis and septic shock, using the ratio between lac-
of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Mortality rates vary
tate and albumin may provide more valuable information
between 20% and 30%, but may increase up to 60–98% in
patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [1–3]. related to mortality, but this has not been researched suffi-
Despite advances in sepsis diagnosis and treatment, the inci- ciently [11]. The present study was designed to investigate
dence of severe sepsis and septic shock has increased [1]. the value of lactate, albumin, and lactate/albumin ratio as
Therefore, biomarkers predictive of mortality are important prognostic markers for mortality in sepsis patients admitted
for the early diagnosis and timely treatment of patients with to the ICU.
septic shock [4].
In severe sepsis and septic shock, elevated blood lactate Materials and methods
levels often result from cellular hypoxia, tissue hypoperfu-
sion, and impaired oxidative phosphorylation secondary to Ethical approval
low oxygen concentration [5]. High lactate level is associated
This study was a retrospective review of data from all
with mortality and is widely used for the early diagnosis,
patients admitted to our ICU due to sepsis between January
treatment, and risk classification of septic shock patients [6].
2016 and January 2019. The study was approved before ini-
Moreover, because blood lactate concentration can be deter-
mined easily and rapidly, it is used as a marker of tissue tiation by the hospital’s local clinical ethics committee and
hypoperfusion in critical patients admitted to the emergency was conducted throughout in accordance with the principles
department or ntensive care unit (ICU) [7,8]. However, an outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
optimal lactate cut-off value that can be used to predict
mortality in the critical patient population has not been Patient data
determined [1].
Albumin is produced in the liver and plays a role in Sepsis was diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory find-
blood oncotic pressure (or colloid osmotic pressure) [9]. As ings according to the Third International Consensus
a negative acute phase protein, serum albumin can also Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock [12]. All patients
serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients with sepsis [10]. diagnosed with sepsis were treated as per the International
Similar to lactate level, serum albumin concentration can Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock [6].

CONTACT Esra Cakir pavulonmouse@hotmail.com Department of Anesthesiology and Clinical of Critical Care, Ankara Numune Education and Research
Hospital, Health Sciences University, Talatpasa Street, Ankara 06130, Turkey
ß 2021 Medisinsk Fysiologisk Forenings Forlag (MFFF)
226 E. CAKIR AND I. O. TURAN

Patients admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis of Results


sepsis were included in the study. Patients admitted for
A total of 1136 of 2340 patients who were admitted to our
other reasons (e.g. trauma, intoxication, neurological and
ICU during the study period and met the inclusion criteria
metabolic disorders, myocardial infarction) were excluded.
were included. Of these 1136 patients, 485 patients died
The patients’ sex, age, their acute physiology and chronic
(42.7%) and 651 were discharged (57.3%). The mean age of
health evaluation (APACHE) II score, sepsis-related organ the patients in the study was 76 years. Nonsurviving patients
failure assessment (SOFA) score, white blood cell (WBC) had significantly higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, MV
count, and C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate, and albumin duration, ICU length of stay, CRP and lactate level, and lac-
levels at time of ICU admission, duration of mechanical tate/albumin ratio and significantly lower albumin level
ventilation (MV), length of ICU stay, presence of bacter- compared to surviving patients (p < .05). The groups were
emia, and mortality data were recorded [13,14]. similar in terms of age, sex, prevalence of bacteremia, and
WBC count (p > .05) (Table 1).
According to the results of ROC analysis for mortality
Determination of serum CRP, lactate, and albumin prediction, lactate had an area under the curve (AUC) of
levels, WBC count, and blood culture 0.816 and cut-off value of > 2.2 mmol/L, albumin had an
AUC of 0.812 and cut-off of  26 g/L, and lactate/albumin
At ICU admission, venous blood samples were collected in ratio had an AUC of 0.869 and cut-off value of > 0.71. The
tubes containing ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and WBC AUC, confidence interval, p, sensitivity, specificity, and posi-
count was determined. Blood samples were also centrifuged tive and negative predictive values for lactate, albumin, and
at 3000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature and the serum lactate/albumin ratio are given in Figure 1. Lactate, albumin,
was used for CRP and albumin analyses. WBC count was and lactate/albumin ratio were all significant predictors of
measured using a Cell-Dyn 3700 automated hemocytometer in-ICU mortality after correction for confounders (lactate:
(Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) that was calibrated twice OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.07, p < .001; albumin: OR 1.25,
daily. Serum CRP concentrations were measured by high- 95% CI 1.16–1.37, p < .001; lactate/albumin: OR 1.42, 95%
sensitivity turbidimetric immunoassay using a Roche CI 1.21–1.64, p < .001).
Modular P analyzer (CRP latex HS, Roche kit, Roche
Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Arterial blood Discussion
samples obtained at time of admission were analyzed imme-
diately for lactate concentration (Radiometer ABL 700 auto- In this study, we observed higher APACHE II and SOFA
mated blood gas analyzer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Positive scores, serum CRP, lactate, and lactate/albumin ratio at
blood cultures (bacteremia) were identified using a admission, longer MV duration and ICU stay, and lower
BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) auto- serum albumin level among sepsis patients who died com-
mated blood culture detection system. pared to those who survived. The AUC values for lactate
and albumin indicated comparable accuracy in mortality
prediction (0.816 and 0.812, respectively), while the AUC
for lactate/albumin ratio demonstrated significantly higher
Data analysis accuracy (0.896). Admitting lactate > 2.2 mmol/L, albumin
Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 17.0  26 g/L, and lactate/albumin ratio > 0.71 were determined
(SPSS, Chicago, IL). p Values less than .05 were considered as optimal predictive thresholds for mortality.
statistically significant. Comparisons between independent High CRP levels and APACHE II and SOFA scores in
groups were made using t-test and/or Mann–Whitney U- sepsis patients indicate that they are more critically ill and
test for non-normally distributed continuous variables and have more inflammation. Consequently, these patients are
expected to have longer duration of MV and higher mortal-
chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
ity rate, which was supported by our results [13–16].
Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate correla-
Consistent with our findings, some previous studies have
tions between parameters. Results for continuous variables
demonstrated that lactate levels are higher and albumin lev-
were expressed as median (minimum–maximum) values.
els are lower in nonsurviving sepsis patients [1,17].
Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and per- In acute conditions, hyperlactatemia is usually an indica-
centage distribution. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) tor of tissue hypoperfusion [8]. Clinical studies have empha-
curve analysis was performed to determine cut-off values for sized that the increase in lactate levels in patients with
lactate, albumin, and lactate/albumin ratio for the prediction sepsis is caused by tissue hypoxia characterized by supply-
of mortality. Univariate analysis was performed including all dependent oxygen consumption [18]. Although a blood lac-
independent variables in the initial model, after which those tate level >4.0 mmol/L was identified as a determinant cut-
with p values less than .05 were selected for univariate logis- off value for resuscitation in sepsis, more recent evidence
tic regression analysis to identify the effect of each factor suggests that lower lactate levels can also be used as cut-off
independently (age, gender, SOFA score, APACHE II score). values [1]. Some studies reported that a lactate level
Odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence >4.0 mmol/L is an indicator of mortality [19,20]. In other
interval were calculated for each variable. studies that determined predictive thresholds for mortality,
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 227

Table 1. Comparison of demographic and clinical features between mortality and non-mortality.
Variables Non- mortality (n ¼ 651) Mortality (n ¼ 485) p Value
Age, (years),a 76 (29–98) 76 (39–101) .143
Male gender, n (%) 338 (51.9) 248 (51.1) .421
APACHE II score,a 18 (9–35) 24 (13–47) <.001
SOFA score,a 8 (3–17) 11 (5–21) <.001
Duration of MV, (days),a 4 (2–42) 9 (1–45) <.001
ICU stay, (days),a 19 (4–55) 21 (4–59) <.001
Bacteremia, n (%) 151 (23.2) 129 (26.6) .212
WBC, (x10E9/L),a 12.3 (1.2–31.0) 9.4 (1.8–44.6) .274
CRP, (mg/L),a 51 (11–362) 141 (19–446) <.001
Lactate, (mmol/L),a 1.4 (0.3–7.1) 2.7 (1.1–8.8) <.001
Albumin, (g/L)a 30 (18–49) 24 (10–45) <.001
Lactate/albumin ratio 0.44 (0.10–2.45) 1.27 (0.35–5.82) <.001
a
Median (minimum-maximum), APACHE II: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score; CRP: C-reactive protein; ICU:
intensive care unit; MV: mechanical ventilation; SOFA: sepsis-related organ failure assessment score; WBC: white blood
cell count.
Statistically significant p values.

Figure 1. ROC curve for lactate, albumin, lactate/albumin ratio predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in intensive care unit.

cut-off values for lactate ranged from 2.3 to 2.5 mmol/L. be misinterpreted as an indicator of good prognosis in high-
These values are close to the optimal cut-off value in our risk patients [22].
analysis (> 2.2 mmol/L). However, previous studies reported Because impaired liver function disrupts albumin synthe-
lower AUC (0.660 and 0.700), sensitivity (60% and 55%), sis, serum albumin level is below normal in patients with
and specificity (67% and 61%) values compared to those hepatic dysfunction [4]. Moreover, albumin is a negative
obtained in our study (AUC ¼ 0.816, 78% sensitivity and acute phase protein that is rapidly down regulated in
77% specificity) [1,21]. Although these studies were similar response to inflammatory signals and can be a predictor of
to ours in terms of the patients’ ages, the difference in cut- negative clinical outcomes. Arnau-Barres et al. found that
off and AUC values may be due to the smaller patient sam- albumin was a determinant of mortality in sepsis patients.
ples in those studies, the presence of different underlying They reported that albumin level < 26 g/L was associated
diseases, and differences in sepsis severity. Nevertheless, ini- with 30-day mortality, similar to our results [17]. In a study
tial blood lactate level is commonly used in the ICU, as it including 348 patients, the AUC value of albumin for mor-
can provide clinicians information about the degree to tality in sepsis patients was 0.755, while this value was 0.812
which high-risk septic patients require ICU admission, in our study. This difference might be related to the patient
hemodynamic monitoring, and organ support [1]. Although sample of that study being smaller in number and younger
lactate is a well-studied prognostic biomarker, interpretation than ours (mean age 64 years vs. 76 years) [23]. Although
is complex due to the pathologic processes that can cause serum albumin level has prognostic value, it is affected by
elevated serum lactate levels. Normal lactate levels can also chronic illness, dietary supplementation, and inflammation,
228 E. CAKIR AND I. O. TURAN

and a single measurement may have limited prognostic patients’ values at admission. Follow-up values and the rela-
value [4]. So, albumin is likely less volatile than lactate, and tionship between these values and clinical outcomes could
is considered to be less valuable marker of frailty, especially not be evaluated. Finally, the patients’ nutritional status and
in the elderly. Thus, using additional indicators may provide liver and kidney functions, which can affect lactate and
more valuable information. albumin levels, could not be evaluated.
Due to these limitations related to the use of lactate and
albumin alone as prognostic factors, lactate/albumin ratio
Conclusion
enhances the prognostic value in sepsis [22]. As a result,
serum lactate and albumin were combined and lactate/albu- Based on the results of our study in the largest ICU case
min ratio has started to be used as a prognostic factor. In a series to date, lactate and albumin alone were found to be
study of 119 sepsis patients in a pediatric ICU, Moustafa strong predictors of mortality in patients admitted to the
et al. determined that the AUC of admitting lactate/albumin ICU due to sepsis. In addition, it was determined that lac-
ratio in the prediction of mortality was 0.681 and the cut- tate/albumin ratio can be used alone as an even stronger
off value was > 1.17. The AUC increased for 6 and 24 h val- predictor of mortality than both parameters separately.
ues (0.714 and 0.856, respectively), while cut-off values were Studies that include follow-up measurements and monitor-
similar (> 1.07 and > 1.1, respectively) [24]. Similar to our ing of additional parameters in a larger number of patients
results, Wang et al. reported that the AUC of lactate/albu- are needed to confirm our findings.
min ratio for predicting mortality was 0.844 and the cut-off
at 24 h was > 1.735 in adult ICU patients with sepsis [11].
Choi et al. determined a lactate/albumin ratio cut-off of > Disclosure statement
1.016 for the prediction of mortality [25]. In a study includ- No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
ing 1381 sepsis patients admitted to the emergency depart-
ment, the cut-off and AUC were reported as > 1.22 and
References
0.670 [22]. In another emergency department study, Shin
et al. reported that lactate/albumin had an AUC of 0.690 [1] Filho RR, Rocha LL, Corr^ea TD, et al. Blood lactate levels cut-
and cut-off of > 1.32 for the prediction of mortality [4]. off and mortality prediction in sepsis-time for a reappraisal? A
retrospective cohort study. Shock. 2016;46(5):480–485.
The predictive thresholds for lactate/albumin ratio in these
[2] Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, ProMISe Trial
studies are higher than our results. In contrast, Lichtenauer Investigators, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for
et al. determined a lactate/albumin ratio cut-off of 0.15 and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–1311.
AUC of 0.700 for mortality in 348 adult ICU patients with [3] Krau SD. Making sense of multiple organ dysfunction syn-
sepsis [23]. In our study, we determined the cut-off as > drome. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2007;19(1):87–97.
[4] Shin J, Hwang SY, Jo IJ, et al. Prognostic value of the lactate/
0.71. The differences in AUC and cut-off values among pre- albumin ratio for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill
vious studies and with our study may stem from differences sepsis patients. Shock. 2018;50(5):545–550.
in the departments in which patients were being treated, the [5] Garcia-Alvarez M, Marik P, Bellomo R. Sepsis-associated
size and mean age of the patient group, and the patients’ hyperlactatemia. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):503
comorbidities. Our results indicated that lactate/albumin [6] Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis cam-
paign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and
ratio at admission had the highest predictive value for mor- septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552.
tality in ICU patients with sepsis, followed by lactate and [7] Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Chansky ME, et al. Serum lactate as a
albumin. This supports the findings of earlier studies per- predictor of mortality in patients with infection. Intensive Care
formed in different departments [4,11,22–24]. To our know- Med. 2007;33(6):970–977.
[8] Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis cam-
ledge, ours is the first study to evaluate lactate/albumin ratio
paign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis
as a predictor of mortality in such a large sample of sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.
patients admitted to the ICU. [9] Yanni GN, Lubis M, Ali M. The influence of albumin level in
Considering the fact that lactate is metabolized mainly by critically III children to length of stay and mortality in paediat-
the liver and to a lesser extent by the kidneys, these patients ric intensive care unit. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:
3455–3458.
often present to the emergency department with elevated
[10] Yin M, Si L, Qin W, et al. Predictive value of serum albumin
lactate levels. Furthermore, clinicians encounter persistently level for the prognosis of severe sepsis without exogenous
high lactate levels in these patients due to impaired clear- human albumin administration: a prospective cohort study. J
ance and are then faced with the question of when to stop Intensive Care Med. 2018;33(12):687–694.
fluid resuscitation. In addition to the superior performance [11] Wang B, Chen G, Cao Y, et al. Correlation of lactate/albumin
ratio level to organ failure and mortality in severe sepsis and
of lactate/albumin ratio compared with lactate alone in this septic shock. J Crit Care. 2015;30(2):271–275.
population, it is also important to pay attention to patients [12] Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third
with poor nutritional status (albumin < 30 g/L). Therefore, International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic
clinicians should consider relying on lactate/albumin ratio Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810.
rather than lactate or albumin alone [4]. [13] Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a
severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;
Our study has certain limitations. The retrospective and 13(10):818–829.
single-center design precludes generalization of our findings. [14] Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related
Additionally, the results were interpreted based on the Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 229

failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related [20] Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, et al. Serum lactate
Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of
Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–710. organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1670–1677.
[15] Memiş D, Gursoy O, Tasdogan M, et al. High C-reactive pro- [21] Wacharasint P, Nakada TA, Boyd JH, et al. Normal-range
tein and low cholesterol levels are prognostic markers of sur- blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and
vival in severe sepsis. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19(3):186–191. predictive. Shock. 2012;38(1):4–10.
[16] Basile-Filho A, Lago AF, Menegueti MG, et al. The use of [22] Bou Chebl R, Jamali S, Sabra M, et al. Lactate/albumin ratio as
APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS 3, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, a predictor of in-hospital mortality in septic patients presenting
to the emergency department. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:
and lactate to predict mortality of surgical critically ill patients:
550182.
a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore)). 2019;
[23] Lichtenauer M, Wernly B, Ohnewein B, et al. The lactate/albu-
98(26):e16204.
min ratio: a valuable tool for risk stratification in septic patients
[17] Arnau-Barres I, G€ uerri-Fernandez R, Luque S, et al. Serum
admitted to ICU. IJMS. 2017;18(9):1893.
albumin is a strong predictor of sepsis outcome in elderly [24] Moustafa AA, Antonios MA, Abdellatif EM, et al. Association
patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(4):743–746. of lactate/albumin ratio level to organ failure and mortality in
[18] Friedman G, De Backer D, Shahla M, et al. Oxygen supply severe sepsis in a pediatric intensive care unit in Egypt. Turk J
dependency can characterize septic shock. Intensive Care Med. Pediatr. 2018;60(6):691–701.
1998;24(2):118–123. [25] Choi SJ, Ha EJ, Jhang WK, et al. Association between the lac-
[19] Howell MD, Donnino M, Clardy P, et al. Occult hypoperfusion tate/albumin ratio and mortality in pediatric septic shock
and mortality in patients with suspected infection. Intensive patients with underlying chronic disease: retrospective pilot
Care Med. 2007;33(11):1892–1899. study. Minerva Pediatr. 2016;68(4):6. PMID: 27405903.

You might also like