Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BA ENGLISCH
MODUL 3: CULTURAL STUDIES
MAP WS 2020/21 (1. Prüfungstermin)
Wählen Sie zur Beantwortung eine Vorlesung und ein Seminar aus.
BITTE VERGESSEN SIE NICHT, DEN NAMEN DES DOZENTEN DES VON IHNEN
BESUCHTEN SEMINARS ZU KENNZEICHNEN BZW: DEUTLICH AUF IHREM ESSAY ZU
VERMERKEN.
“According to Stuart Hall there are two phases in Black post-war politics in Britain. Describe and
explain the differences between the two phases and how they affect our understanding of representation.
Provide one suitable example from British culture that was NOT covered in Hall’s text or in class (a text,
film, image, monument …) to substantiate your argument and discuss in detail how that artefact contributes
to an understanding of what Hall calls “new ethnicities”.”
Answer:
In his chapter “New Ethnicities”,1 Stuart Hall distinguishes two phases of Black politics in
British culture. In the way I understand it, his goal is to mainly focus and discuss the latter and
more mature one, differentiating it from the more simplified phase during which the notion of a
general “black” identity was dominant. It is important to note in the beginning, that Hall neither
sees the two phases in comparison nor as the latter substituting the former. He analyzes them as
parts of a common process where one gradually displaces the other.
The first phase of the process has created the idea of a common “black experience” as
differentiation from its white and culturally dominant equivalent. In this sense, in this phase, the
different experiences of people coming from different historical, geographical, cultural, political,
etc. backgrounds are identified under one common label, “black”. These people are considered as
parts of the social sphere in a negative way, as the counterexamples of the “normal” white-
dominated sphere.
This changes in the second phase, where the integration of these people into the
multicultural modern societies and their role in the sociopolitical discourse transforms them from
objects to subjects. In the words of the author, “what is at issue here is the recognition of the
extraordinary diversity […] which compose the category “black”.2 While previously the former
colonial subjects needed to be categorized as a single unit to become a matter of consideration, in
the second phase described by Hall they need to also be analyzed under the prism of their different
backgrounds, to be understood as functional parts of social and cultural categories. This process is
complicated and this is also recognized by the author itself, but in it, we can also observe the ideas
of intersectionality, where the “black object” is no more part of a romantic representation, where
he or she is always part of a victimization process, but acts like a human being with all the attributes
of a social and cultural subject (race, gender, class, etc.).3
Hall’s idea of the new ethnicities summarizes this analysis of the two phases. While under
“ethnicity”, most people would understand a dominant notion of race (a White Englishman, for
example) which was “doomed to survive […] only by marginalizing, dispossessing, displacing,
and forgetting other ethnicities”,4 the “new ethnicities” also include groups, such as the “blacks”,
that used to be marginalized, etc. by the previously dominant race. Although, of course, Hall does
not imply here that an absolute “race” equality has been achieved, he shows the unfolding of this
process.
A characteristic example of the realization of this process is the African and Caribbean War
Memorial in Brixton, London, inaugurated (also quite characteristically) in 2017. It commemorates
the victims of the First and Second World Wars who served under the British Flag but were not
explicitly mentioned in other memorials of the war effort or were forgotten as being parts of
common British ethnicity, represented almost exclusively by examples of traditional White British
men. By unveiling a separate monument for these former colonial subjects who were called to fight
for the British Empire, alongside servicemen (and women) from India, Australia, New Zealand,
etc. shows the new role that is given to previously marginalized ethnic groups. It is important to
mention here that the term “African and Caribbean” also does not make explicit the differentiation
between the different cultural heritages of those people both before and after colonialism (millions
of Africans from many different cultures were solved as slaves to work in Caribbean plantations),
but at least it mentions the particularity of their participation of the war and transforms them into a
separate important factor in the final victory of the British Empire.
This legitimation of their separate memory is a process that is taking place in the Western
World in the last decades and is a signal of both guilt and gratitude from the side of the former
colonial nations to the ethnicities that have been exploited during the course of the 15th- to 20th
century, maybe even symbolizing a hope of the annulment of imperialistic and post-colonial
exploitation in the 21st.
1
Hall, Stuart. “New Ethnicities.” Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, edited by David Morley and Kuan-
Hsing Chen, Routledge, 1996, pp. 441-449.
2
Hall, 443.
3
Hall, 445-446.
4
Hall, 447.