TANZANIA INSTITUTE ACCOUNTANCY

(TIA)

DEPARTMENT OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES MASTERS OF

SCIENCE IN PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT

LECTURE: DR. MSUYA

STUDENT NAME: GERALD ULIRICK

COURCE: MSc.PSM

REG NO: DSM/ MSc.PSM /22/104305

SUBJECT NAME: INVONTORY MANAGEMENT

CODE: PSG 09202

TASK: GROUP ASSIGNMENT

QUESTION
Organisations have numerous techniques for forecasting future requirements and controlling the
flow of materials. Discuss the following techniques with a view to elaborate on its strength and
weakness while hinting at where each technique can be applied appropriately.

i. Judgmental Techniques
ii. Times Series Methods (Moving Averages and Exponential Smoothing Techniques)
iii. Causal Models (Linear and Non-Linear Regression Models)
iv. ABC Analysis
v. Fast Moving, Slow Moving and Not Moving (FSN) Analysis
vi. Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Models (Without Discounts and Lead Times and
With Discounts and Lead Time)
vii. Order Point System (without safety stock and with safety stock)
viii. Differentiate between the periodic review ordering system and the EOQ model
ix. Just In Time (JIT)
x. Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement
xi. Framework Contracts (Blanket Orders with call-off orders)
xii. Two Bin Systems
xiii. Critically discuss the pros and cons of conducting stocktaking in a business
organization
i. Judgmental Techniques

Judgmental techniques in forecasting refer to methods that rely on the opinions, insights, and
expertise of individuals or groups to make predictions about future requirements and control the
flow of materials. These techniques are subjective in nature and involve human judgment rather
than relying solely on statistical or quantitative data. There are several judgmental techniques
commonly used in forecasting, including the Delphi method, executive opinions, and sales force
composite.

1. Delphi Method:

The Delphi method is a structured approach that gathers opinions from a panel of experts
through a series of questionnaires and feedback iterations. The experts provide their judgments
independently, and the results are compiled and shared anonymously with the group in
subsequent rounds. This iterative process continues until a consensus is reached.

Strengths:

i. The Delphi method allows for the inclusion of diverse viewpoints from experts, thereby
reducing bias and improving the overall accuracy of the forecast.
ii. It facilitates the exploration of complex and uncertain future scenarios by soliciting inputs
from multiple experts in a structured manner.
iii. The anonymity of responses in the Delphi method encourages honest and independent
opinions from the participants.

Weaknesses:

i. The process can be time-consuming, especially if multiple rounds of feedback are

required to reach a consensus.
ii. There is a potential for groupthink or dominance by certain experts, leading to biased
results.
iii. The method heavily relies on the expertise and judgment of the selected panel, which
may be limited or outdated.

1
Appropriate Application:

The Delphi method is particularly useful when there is a lack of historical data or when
forecasting for emerging or rapidly changing markets. It can be applied in situations where a
variety of perspectives is valuable, such as technology forecasting, strategic planning, or long-
term demand forecasting.

2. Executive Opinions:

Executive opinions involve gathering forecasts from senior executives or managers who possess
extensive knowledge and experience in the organization or industry. These individuals provide
their predictions based on their intuition, industry insights, and understanding of market
dynamics.

Strengths:

i. Executive opinions can incorporate valuable insights and tacit knowledge possessed by
senior executives, which may not be easily quantifiable or captured by other forecasting
methods.
ii. The method allows for quick decision-making based on the expertise of key decision-
makers.
iii. It can be useful when historical data is limited or unreliable.

Weaknesses:

i. The forecasts are subjective and may be influenced by individual biases, leading to less
accurate results.
ii. There is a risk of overreliance on a few individuals, potentially ignoring diverse
perspectives.
iii. The method may not be suitable for complex or rapidly changing environments where
expert judgment alone may not capture the full picture.

2
Appropriate Application:

Executive opinions are often employed in scenarios where time is limited, and decisions need to
be made promptly. They can be useful for short-term forecasting, operational planning, and
situations where historical data is not readily available.

3. Sales Force Composite:

The sales force composite technique involves collecting individual sales forecasts from members
of the sales team and aggregating them to create a final forecast. The sales representatives
provide their estimates based on their knowledge of customers, current orders, and market
conditions.

Strengths:

i. Sales force composite leverages the expertise of the sales team, who have direct customer
interactions and insights into market trends.
ii. The method allows for the consideration of factors that may not be captured in
quantitative models, such as changes in customer preferences or competitor activities.
iii. It promotes buy-in and involvement from the sales team, which can increase their
commitment to achieving the forecasted targets.

Weaknesses:

i. The forecasts are influenced by the individual salespeople's biases, varying levels of
expertise, and potential personal agendas.
ii. The accuracy of the forecasts heavily relies on the sales team's ability to gather and
interpret market information accurately.
iii. Sales force composite may not be suitable for industries with long lead times or where
sales representatives have limited visibility into the overall market.

Appropriate Application:

3
The sales force composite technique is commonly used in industries where sales representatives
play a significant role in driving demand, such as consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, and B2B
sales. It is particularly useful for short- to medium-term forecasting, territory planning, and sales
target setting.

Overall, judgmental techniques provide valuable insights and complement quantitative methods
in forecasting future requirements. However, they are subject to human biases and limitations.
Therefore, it is crucial to use these techniques judiciously, considering the specific context and
limitations of each method.

4
ii. Times Series Methods (Moving Averages and Exponential Smoothing Techniques)

Time series methods analyze historical data to predict future requirements and material flow
patterns. Moving averages and exponential smoothing are two commonly used techniques in this
domain.

Organizations employ various techniques to forecast future requirements and control the flow of
materials effectively. This discussion will focus on time series methods, specifically moving
averages and exponential smoothing techniques, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses
while suggesting appropriate applications for each technique.

1. Moving Averages:

Moving averages involve calculating the average of a specific number of consecutive periods to
identify trends and patterns. Strengths and weaknesses of moving averages are as follows:

Strengths:

i. Simplicity: Moving averages are easy to understand and implement, making them
accessible to a wide range of users.
ii. Smoothing Effect: Moving averages smooth out fluctuations and provide a clearer view
of underlying trends, making them suitable for stable and predictable demand patterns.
iii. Adaptive to Change: Moving averages can adapt to changing trends by adjusting the
number of periods considered, allowing for responsiveness in forecasting.

Weaknesses:

i. Lagging Indicator: Moving averages provide forecasts based on historical data, which
may not capture sudden changes or outliers in demand patterns.
ii. Insensitivity to Seasonality: Moving averages may not adequately capture seasonal
variations in demand, resulting in inaccurate forecasts for seasonal products or services.
iii. Equal Weighting: Moving averages treat all data points equally, regardless of their age,
potentially leading to outdated or less relevant information influencing forecasts.

5
Appropriate Applications:

Moving averages are well-suited for forecasting stable and non-seasonal demand patterns,
especially when historical data is limited or unstable. They are commonly used in industries with
slow-changing demand, such as certain durable goods or long-term service contracts.

2. Exponential Smoothing Techniques:

Exponential smoothing techniques assign different weights to historical data points, giving more
importance to recent observations. This approach offers several strengths and weaknesses:

Strengths:

i. Flexibility: Exponential smoothing techniques allow users to adapt the level of

responsiveness to recent data by adjusting smoothing factors.
ii. Weighted Importance: Recent observations receive more weight, enabling the model to
quickly adapt to changing demand patterns or trends.
iii. Simplicity: Exponential smoothing methods are relatively easy to understand and
implement, requiring minimal computational resources.

Weaknesses:

i. Limited Memory: Exponential smoothing techniques give more weight to recent

observations, potentially neglecting older data that may still hold relevance.
ii. Lack of Seasonality Handling: Basic exponential smoothing does not explicitly consider
seasonal variations, leading to less accurate forecasts for seasonal demand patterns.
iii. Parameter Selection: Choosing appropriate smoothing factors can be challenging and
subjective, requiring careful consideration of historical data characteristics.

Appropriate Applications:

6
Exponential smoothing techniques are suitable for forecasting demand patterns that exhibit a
gradual change or trend with relatively stable seasonality. They are commonly employed in
industries with moderately predictable demand, such as fast-moving consumer goods or short-
term service contracts.

Conclusion:

Time series methods, including moving averages and exponential smoothing techniques, offer
organizations valuable tools for forecasting future requirements and controlling material flow.
While moving averages are simple and adaptable, they may struggle to capture sudden changes
or seasonal patterns accurately. Exponential smoothing techniques, on the other hand, prioritize
recent data and offer flexibility, but may overlook long-term trends or explicit seasonality.
Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each technique allows organizations to make
informed decisions and choose the most appropriate approach for their specific forecasting
needs.

7
iii. Causal Models (Linear and Non-Linear Regression Models)

Causal models, specifically linear and non-linear regression models, are widely used techniques
for forecasting future requirements and controlling the flow of materials in organizations. These
models analyze the relationship between independent variables (such as demand, price, or other
factors) and dependent variables (such as the quantity of materials required or the flow of
materials) to make predictions and optimize material flow management. In this discussion, we
will explore the strengths and weaknesses of causal models and suggest suitable applications for
each technique.

Strengths of Causal Models:

1. Quantitative Analysis: Causal models, particularly linear and non-linear regression models,
allow organizations to perform rigorous quantitative analysis of historical data and identify
relationships between variables. These models can help forecast future requirements and control
the flow of materials based on the observed cause-and-effect relationships.

2. Flexibility: Causal models can accommodate various types of data, such as historical sales
data, market trends, economic indicators, and other relevant factors. This flexibility enables
organizations to incorporate multiple variables and factors into their forecasting models,
resulting in more accurate predictions.

3. Interpretability: Causal models provide a clear understanding of the relationship between

independent variables (causes) and dependent variables (effects). This interpretability helps
decision-makers gain insights into the key factors that influence material requirements and flow,
facilitating informed decision-making.

Weaknesses of Causal Models:

1. Assumptions and Limitations: Causal models, especially linear regression models, rely on
certain assumptions such as linearity, independence, and homoscedasticity. Violation of these
assumptions can lead to inaccurate forecasts. Additionally, causal models assume that the

8
relationships observed in historical data will persist in the future, which may not always hold true
in a dynamic business environment.

2. Data Requirements: Causal models require a significant amount of accurate and reliable
historical data to establish meaningful relationships. Insufficient or poor-quality data can
undermine the accuracy and effectiveness of these models. Moreover, obtaining relevant data for
all potential causal factors can be challenging, potentially limiting the model's effectiveness.

3. Complexity and Expertise: Developing and implementing causal models, particularly non-
linear regression models, can be complex and require statistical expertise. Organizations may
need skilled analysts or data scientists to build and validate these models, which could pose a
challenge for smaller or resource-constrained organizations.

Appropriate Applications:

1. Demand Forecasting: Causal models are commonly used for demand forecasting by
incorporating factors such as historical sales data, marketing efforts, and external variables like
economic indicators. This technique helps organizations anticipate future requirements and
optimize material flow accordingly.

2. Supply Chain Planning: Causal models can aid in supply chain planning by considering
variables like lead times, production capacities, and market demand fluctuations. These models
help optimize inventory levels, reduce stockouts, and streamline the flow of materials within the
supply chain.

3. Resource Allocation: Causal models can assist in allocating resources effectively by analyzing
the relationship between resource utilization and material requirements. Organizations can use
these models to determine the optimal allocation of resources based on anticipated future needs.

Overall, causal models, including linear and non-linear regression models, offer a robust
approach to forecasting future requirements and controlling material flow. By leveraging
historical data and identifying cause-and-effect relationships, organizations can make informed
decisions to optimize their operations. However, it is crucial to be mindful of the assumptions

9
and limitations associated with these models and ensure the availability of high-quality data for
accurate predictions.

10
iv. ABC Analysis

ABC Analysis is a widely used technique in inventory management and supply chain
management that categorizes items based on their value or importance. The technique classifies
items into three categories: A, B, and C, according to their significance in terms of cost, usage, or
other relevant factors. Each category is assigned different levels of control and attention,
allowing organizations to prioritize their resources effectively.

Strengths of ABC Analysis:

1. Efficient resource allocation: ABC Analysis enables organizations to focus their attention and
resources on items that have the highest impact on their operations. Category A items,
representing high-value or critical items, receive greater control and scrutiny, ensuring adequate
stock levels and minimizing the risk of shortages. Meanwhile, category C items, which are less
significant, can be managed with less effort and cost.

2. Cost savings: By identifying the items with the highest value or impact, organizations can
reduce inventory holding costs. Concentrating efforts on managing category A items optimizes
stock levels, reducing the need for excess inventory and associated costs, such as storage and
obsolescence.

3. Strategic decision-making: ABC Analysis provides valuable insights into the organization's
supply chain and inventory management strategy. By classifying items based on their
significance, decision-makers can make informed choices regarding procurement, storage, and
distribution. For example, category A items may require closer supplier relationships or the
implementation of just-in-time inventory practices.

Weaknesses of ABC Analysis:

1. Limited focus on other factors: ABC Analysis primarily considers the value or usage of items,
neglecting other essential factors such as lead time, product criticality, and quality requirements.
Focusing solely on cost or value may lead to oversights in managing items with significant lead
time or quality-related risks.

11
2. Subjectivity in categorization: The classification of items into categories A, B, or C requires
subjective judgments based on the organization's specific criteria. Different individuals or teams
may interpret and assign categories differently, leading to inconsistencies in managing items. It
is crucial to establish clear guidelines and criteria for categorization to minimize subjectivity.

3. Static nature: ABC Analysis is based on historical data and often assumes a static relationship
between the value of items and their significance over time. However, the importance of items
can change due to market dynamics, product lifecycle stages, or shifts in customer demand.
Organizations need to regularly review and update their categorizations to account for such
changes.

Appropriate Applications of ABC Analysis:

ABC Analysis is most appropriate in inventory management and supply chain settings where
resources are limited, and prioritization is necessary. Some suitable applications include:

1. Managing spare parts inventory, where category A items may include critical components
that require close monitoring and availability.
2. Procurement strategy, where category A items may warrant long-term contracts or
preferential terms with suppliers.
3. Warehouse management, where category A items can be strategically located for easy
access and quick replenishment.

Overall, ABC Analysis is a valuable technique that helps organizations allocate resources
effectively, reduce costs, and make informed decisions. However, it should be complemented
with other forecasting and control techniques to consider additional factors beyond value or
usage.

12
v. Fast Moving, Slow Moving and Not Moving (FSN) Analysis

Fast Moving, Slow Moving, and Not Moving (FSN) Analysis is a technique used by
organizations to classify inventory items based on their consumption patterns and demand
variability. By categorizing items as fast moving, slow moving, or not moving, organizations can
develop appropriate strategies for inventory control, procurement, and production planning. This
technique helps in forecasting future requirements and controlling the flow of materials. Let's
discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate applications of FSN analysis.

Strengths of FSN Analysis:

1. Efficient resource allocation: FSN Analysis allows organizations to allocate resources

effectively by identifying the items that require more attention. Fast-moving items can be given
priority in terms of stock replenishment, ensuring availability and reducing the risk of stockouts.
Slow-moving and not-moving items can be managed differently, minimizing holding costs and
avoiding excess inventory.

2. Demand forecasting: FSN Analysis provides insights into the demand patterns of different
inventory items. Fast-moving items with high turnover rates have more predictable demand,
enabling accurate forecasting and efficient planning. This helps organizations optimize their
production schedules and procurement activities.

3. Inventory optimization: By categorizing items based on their consumption patterns,

organizations can optimize inventory levels. Fast-moving items can be stocked in larger
quantities to meet high demand, while slow-moving items can be kept at lower levels to
minimize holding costs. Not-moving items can be critically reviewed to determine if they should
be phased out or replaced.

Weaknesses of FSN Analysis:

1. Limited perspective: FSN Analysis primarily focuses on consumption patterns and demand
variability. It may not consider other factors that influence inventory management, such as lead

13
times, supplier reliability, or seasonality. Overreliance on FSN Analysis alone may overlook
critical aspects of inventory control.

2. Lack of context: While FSN Analysis provides insights into the movement of inventory items,
it does not consider the underlying reasons for their categorization. Items may be slow-moving
due to factors like low demand, poor marketing, or limited market potential. Simply categorizing
items as slow-moving without understanding the underlying causes may lead to incorrect
decisions.

Appropriate Applications of FSN Analysis:

1. Retail industry: FSN Analysis is particularly relevant in the retail industry, where fast-moving
items need to be readily available to meet customer demand. By categorizing products based on
their movement patterns, retailers can stock popular items in sufficient quantities, improving
customer satisfaction and avoiding lost sales opportunities.

2. Manufacturing sector: FSN Analysis can be applied in the manufacturing sector to manage
raw materials and components effectively. By identifying fast-moving items, manufacturers can
ensure a continuous supply to support production schedules. Slow-moving items can be reviewed
to avoid overstocking and reduce carrying costs.

In conclusion, FSN Analysis is a valuable technique for forecasting future requirements and
controlling the flow of materials. Its strengths lie in efficient resource allocation, demand
forecasting, and inventory optimization. However, it has limitations in terms of limited
perspective and lack of contextual understanding. FSN Analysis finds appropriate applications in
industries such as retail and manufacturing.

14
vi. Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Models (Without Discounts and Lead Times and With
Discounts and Lead Time)

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) models are widely used techniques in supply chain
management to determine the optimal quantity of materials to order at a given time. There are
two variations of EOQ models: one without discounts and lead times, and the other with
discounts and lead times. Let's discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate applications of
each technique.

1. EOQ Models without Discounts and Lead Times:

Strengths:

1. Simplicity: EOQ models without discounts and lead times are relatively simple to
understand and implement.
2. Minimization of holding and ordering costs: These models aim to strike a balance
between the costs associated with carrying inventory (holding costs) and placing orders
(ordering costs), leading to optimal inventory levels.
3. Applicability to stable demand: This technique is most suitable when demand for the
product is relatively stable over time.

Weaknesses:

1. Limited to deterministic assumptions: EOQ models without discounts and lead times
assume a constant demand rate, fixed costs, and no uncertainties. However, in real-world
scenarios, demand fluctuations, variable costs, and uncertainties may exist, limiting the
accuracy of the model.
2. Ignores lead time and stockouts: This technique does not consider lead time, the time
taken from placing an order to receiving it, and the costs associated with stockouts,
potentially leading to inventory shortages or excesses.

Appropriate Applications:

15
EOQ models without discounts and lead times are useful for managing inventory of low-cost,
non-perishable items where demand is relatively stable, and there are no significant variations in
lead times or stockout costs.

2. EOQ Models with Discounts and Lead Times:

Strengths:

1. Consideration of quantity discounts: This technique takes into account the possibility of
price discounts for larger order quantities, allowing organizations to optimize their
purchasing decisions to minimize costs.
2. Incorporation of lead times: EOQ models with lead times factor in the time required for
order processing, transportation, and other logistics, ensuring that inventory is
replenished in a timely manner.
3. Enhanced cost-effectiveness: By considering discounts and lead times, organizations can
achieve cost savings by optimizing the quantity and timing of their orders.

Weaknesses:

1. Complexity: EOQ models with discounts and lead times can be more complex than their
basic counterparts due to the inclusion of discount schedules and lead time
considerations.
2. Limited applicability: These models may not be suitable for products with highly variable
demand patterns or when multiple suppliers with varying lead times are involved.

Appropriate Applications:

EOQ models with discounts and lead times are beneficial for organizations procuring products
with quantity-based discounts and managing inventory levels considering lead times. This is
particularly useful when a single supplier is involved, and the demand is relatively stable.

16
In conclusion, EOQ models provide valuable insights into managing inventory levels and
ordering quantities. The choice between the two variations depends on the specific
characteristics of the products, demand patterns, and the presence of discounts and lead times.

17
vii. Order Point System (without safety stock and with safety stock)

The Order Point System is a widely used technique in inventory management for forecasting
future requirements and controlling the flow of materials. It helps organizations determine when
to reorder items based on the inventory level reaching a specific threshold, known as the order
point or reorder point. This technique can be applied with or without safety stock, depending on
the organization's needs and goals. Let's discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate
applications of the Order Point System with and without safety stock.

1. Order Point System without Safety Stock:

Strengths:

1. Simplicity: The Order Point System without safety stock is relatively simple to implement and
understand. It requires minimal calculations and can be easily managed manually or through
automated systems.

2. Cost-effective: By not carrying safety stock, organizations can minimize inventory holding
costs, such as warehousing, insurance, and obsolescence.

3. Efficient for stable demand: This technique is well-suited for products with stable and
predictable demand patterns. It ensures timely reordering based on actual usage, reducing the
risk of stockouts.

Weaknesses:

1. Vulnerable to demand variability: The Order Point System without safety stock is highly
sensitive to demand variability. If demand fluctuates unexpectedly, there is a higher risk of
stockouts and potential customer dissatisfaction.

2. Longer lead times: Organizations relying solely on this technique may face challenges if there
are long lead times between ordering and receiving items. It may result in delayed order
fulfillment during periods of high demand or supply disruptions.

18
Appropriate Applications:

The Order Point System without safety stock is suitable in the following scenarios:

1. Products with stable and predictable demand patterns.

2. Organizations with short lead times or frequent deliveries.

3. Perishable goods or fast-moving consumer goods where inventory turnover is rapid.

2. Order Point System with Safety Stock:

Strengths:

1. Risk mitigation: Safety stock acts as a buffer to accommodate demand variability and
unexpected events such as supply disruptions or increased customer demand. It helps prevent
stockouts and maintain customer satisfaction.

2. Flexibility: The presence of safety stock allows organizations to respond to sudden changes in
demand or supply conditions without significant disruptions.

3. Better service levels: With safety stock, organizations can ensure high service levels by
reducing the likelihood of stockouts, even during periods of increased demand.

Weaknesses:

1. Increased holding costs: Safety stock adds to the overall inventory holding costs.
Organizations need to allocate additional resources to manage and store the extra inventory,
incurring higher expenses.

2. Obsolescence risk: Keeping safety stock for a long duration increases the risk of products
becoming obsolete or reaching their expiry dates, especially for items with short shelf lives.

19
3. Inventory accuracy challenges: Maintaining accurate records of safety stock levels can be
challenging, leading to discrepancies between physical stock and inventory management
systems.

Appropriate Applications:

The Order Point System with safety stock is suitable in the following scenarios:

1. Products with high demand variability or intermittent demand patterns.

2. Industries with long lead times or supply chain uncertainties.

3. Essential items or products with limited alternatives, where stockouts can have significant
consequences.

In summary, the Order Point System, both with and without safety stock, offers different benefits
and considerations. Organizations should carefully assess their demand patterns, supply chain
dynamics, and cost constraints to determine the appropriate technique to use in their inventory
management strategy.

20
viii. Differentiate between the periodic review ordering system and the EOQ mode

The periodic review ordering system and the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model are two
commonly used techniques in inventory management for forecasting future requirements and
controlling the flow of materials. Each technique has its own strengths and weaknesses, and they
are applicable in different scenarios.

1. Periodic Review Ordering System:

The periodic review ordering system, also known as the periodic review system or fixed-time
period system, involves reviewing inventory levels at specific intervals and placing orders to
replenish stock. Here are its strengths and weaknesses:

Strengths:

a. Simplicity: The periodic review system is relatively easy to implement and understand. It
requires setting a fixed review period and determining the optimal order quantity based on the
inventory position at that time.

b. Flexibility: This technique is suitable for managing a wide range of items, especially those
with irregular demand patterns or long lead times.

c. Cost savings: By consolidating orders and taking advantage of economies of scale, the
periodic review system can reduce ordering and transportation costs.

Weaknesses:

a. Higher inventory levels: Since orders are placed at fixed intervals, the periodic review system
may lead to higher average inventory levels compared to other techniques.

b. Variable demand: If the demand for an item is highly variable or uncertain, the fixed review
period may result in stockouts or excessive safety stock.

Appropriate Applications:

21
The periodic review ordering system is well-suited for items with relatively stable demand
patterns and when the cost of holding inventory is not critical. It is commonly used for low-value
items, spare parts, or non-critical supplies.

2. Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model:

The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model calculates the optimal order quantity that minimizes
total inventory costs by balancing holding costs and ordering costs. Here are its strengths and
weaknesses:

Strengths:

a. Cost efficiency: The EOQ model aims to minimize total inventory costs by determining the
optimal order quantity, leading to cost savings by reducing both holding costs and ordering costs.

b. Considers carrying costs: The EOQ model takes into account the costs associated with
carrying inventory, such as storage costs, insurance, and obsolescence, resulting in optimal
inventory levels.

c. Demand stability: It assumes a constant demand rate, making it suitable for items with
relatively stable demand patterns.

Weaknesses:

a. Complex calculations: The EOQ model requires detailed information about ordering costs,
carrying costs, and demand patterns. Obtaining accurate data and performing the calculations can
be time-consuming and challenging.

b. Assumptions: The EOQ model assumes that demand is constant and known, lead times are
fixed, and no quantity discounts are available. These assumptions may not hold true in real-world
scenarios.

Appropriate Applications:

22
The EOQ model is particularly useful for managing high-value or critical items with stable
demand patterns and known costs. It is commonly applied to raw materials, finished goods, or
products with limited shelf life.

In conclusion, the periodic review ordering system and the EOQ model are two techniques used
to forecast future requirements and control material flow. The periodic review system offers
simplicity and flexibility, while the EOQ model focuses on cost efficiency and optimal inventory
levels. Choosing the appropriate technique depends on factors such as demand patterns, cost
considerations, and item characteristics.

23
ix. Just In Time (JIT)

Just-In-Time (JIT) is a technique used by organizations to manage the flow of materials and
inventory in a manner that minimizes waste and maximizes efficiency. It involves receiving
materials or goods just when they are needed in the production process, reducing the need for
excess inventory and storage space. JIT is often associated with lean manufacturing principles
and is widely implemented in various industries.

Strengths of Just-In-Time (JIT):

1. Waste reduction: JIT helps eliminate waste by ensuring that materials are used immediately,
minimizing the need for excess inventory. This reduces costs associated with storage, handling,
and obsolescence.

2. Improved efficiency: JIT enables organizations to operate with lower inventory levels, freeing
up capital that can be invested in other areas of the business. It also reduces lead times, allowing
for quicker response to customer demands.

3. Quality improvement: JIT emphasizes the importance of maintaining high-quality standards.

By reducing inventory and batch sizes, defects and issues can be identified and resolved more
quickly, leading to better overall product quality.

4. Cost savings: With reduced inventory, organizations can save on storage costs, inventory
carrying costs, and associated risks, such as stock obsolescence and write-offs.

Weaknesses of Just-In-Time (JIT):

1. Supply chain vulnerability: JIT heavily relies on a tightly coordinated supply chain. If there
are disruptions in the supply chain, such as delays in material deliveries or unexpected demand
fluctuations, it can lead to production delays or stockouts.

2. Increased risk: JIT leaves little room for error. Any disruptions or delays can quickly impact
production schedules and customer satisfaction. Organizations must have contingency plans and
strong relationships with suppliers to mitigate risks.

24
3. Lack of buffer stock: JIT aims to minimize inventory levels, which means there is little buffer
stock available to handle unexpected demand spikes or supply disruptions. This can lead to
stockouts and lost sales opportunities.

4. High coordination requirements: JIT requires close coordination between suppliers,

production, and logistics. This coordination can be challenging, especially in complex supply
chains with multiple stakeholders.

Appropriate application of Just-In-Time (JIT):

JIT is most suitable for organizations that have stable and predictable demand, strong supplier
relationships, and efficient supply chains. It is commonly used in industries such as automotive
manufacturing, electronics, and retail, where demand patterns are relatively stable, and there is a
need for cost efficiency and waste reduction.

25
x. Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement

Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) is a technique used by organizations to manage and control
the flow of materials by allowing the vendor to take responsibility for inventory replenishment.
In this arrangement, the vendor monitors the customer's inventory levels and initiates
replenishment orders based on agreed-upon criteria. This technique offers several strengths and
weaknesses, and its appropriate application depends on the specific requirements of the
organization.

Strengths of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement:

1. Reduced inventory holding costs: VMI enables organizations to reduce their inventory holding
costs by shifting the burden of inventory management to the vendor. The vendor has a better
understanding of demand patterns and can optimize inventory levels, leading to lower inventory
carrying costs for the organization.

2. Improved supply chain efficiency: VMI enhances supply chain efficiency by streamlining the
replenishment process. With real-time access to inventory data, vendors can proactively manage
inventory levels, resulting in reduced stockouts, improved product availability, and lower lead
times.

3. Enhanced collaboration and information sharing: VMI fosters closer collaboration between the
organization and the vendor. By sharing sales data, forecasts, and other relevant information,
both parties can align their operations and make more accurate demand predictions. This
collaboration helps in reducing uncertainties and achieving better supply chain coordination.

Weaknesses of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement:

1. Loss of control: Organizations adopting VMI relinquish some control over their inventory
management to the vendor. They rely heavily on the vendor's ability to accurately forecast
demand and maintain appropriate inventory levels. Inaccurate forecasts or inadequate
communication can lead to stockouts or excess inventory.

26
2. Information sharing challenges: Implementing VMI requires sharing sensitive data and
information with the vendor. This can raise concerns related to data security, confidentiality, and
competitive advantage. Organizations need to establish robust data sharing agreements and
ensure adequate safeguards are in place to protect sensitive information.

3. Dependency on vendor performance: The success of VMI heavily relies on the vendor's
performance and reliability. If the vendor fails to fulfill their responsibilities effectively, it can
disrupt the organization's supply chain and lead to customer dissatisfaction. Organizations need
to carefully select vendors and establish clear performance metrics and monitoring mechanisms.

Appropriate application of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement:

Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) can be applied in various contexts where close collaboration
with suppliers is crucial and where inventory management efficiencies can be achieved. Some
appropriate applications include:

1. Retail industry: VMI can be beneficial in retail settings where suppliers have better visibility
into sales data and demand patterns. It helps in maintaining optimal stock levels, reducing out-of-
stock situations, and improving customer satisfaction.

2. Just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing: VMI can be integrated into JIT manufacturing processes,
where suppliers play an active role in managing inventory levels to support seamless production
flows and minimize inventory holding costs.

3. Complex and specialized supply chains: In industries with intricate supply chains involving
multiple tiers of suppliers, VMI can help in synchronizing activities, reducing inventory buffers,
and improving overall supply chain performance.

Overall, the Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement offers the potential for cost savings,
improved supply chain efficiency, and better collaboration. However, careful consideration of
the organization's specific needs, vendor selection, and robust communication channels is
essential to mitigate potential risks and ensure successful implementation.

27
28
Xi. Framework Contracts (Blanket Orders with call-off orders):

Framework contracts, also known as blanket orders with call-off orders, are a procurement
technique commonly used by organizations to establish long-term agreements with suppliers for
the provision of goods or services. Under this arrangement, the organization and the supplier
agree on general terms and conditions, such as pricing, delivery schedules, and quality
requirements, but specific quantities and delivery dates are determined through individual call-
off orders.

Strengths:

1. Cost Efficiency: Framework contracts allow organizations to negotiate favorable pricing and
terms due to the long-term commitment and volume of business involved. This can lead to cost
savings and improved profitability.

2. Flexibility: The call-off order mechanism provides flexibility by allowing organizations to

adjust the quantity and timing of their orders based on actual requirements. This helps in
optimizing inventory levels and avoiding stockouts or excess inventory.

3. Streamlined Procurement Process: By establishing a framework contract, organizations

simplify the procurement process. Once the agreement is in place, subsequent purchases can be
made quickly through call-off orders, eliminating the need for extensive negotiations and
paperwork.

4. Supplier Relationship Management: Framework contracts facilitate long-term relationships

with suppliers, enabling organizations to build trust and understanding. This can lead to
improved collaboration, innovation, and better overall service from suppliers.

Weaknesses:

1. Commitment to a Single Supplier: Framework contracts often involve a commitment to a

specific supplier for an extended period. This limits the organization's ability to explore

29
alternative suppliers, potentially missing out on better pricing or innovative solutions available
from other vendors.

2. Lack of Competitive Bidding: The absence of competitive bidding for individual call-off
orders may result in missed opportunities to obtain better pricing or quality from alternative
suppliers.

3. Changing Market Conditions: Framework contracts are based on forecasts and assumptions
made at the time of agreement. If market conditions change significantly, such as shifts in
demand or price fluctuations, the organization may find itself locked into unfavorable terms.

4. Administrative Burden: Managing and monitoring the call-off orders can be resource-
intensive, especially if the organization deals with multiple framework contracts and suppliers. It
requires effective contract management and coordination to ensure compliance with terms and
conditions.

Appropriate Application:

Framework contracts are well-suited for organizations that have stable or predictable
requirements for goods or services over an extended period. They are particularly beneficial in
industries with long production cycles or for the procurement of essential goods or services
where continuity of supply is crucial. Examples include infrastructure projects, government
contracts, healthcare supplies, and manufacturing industries.

30
xii. Two Bin Systems

Two Bin Systems is a materials control technique commonly used by organizations to manage
inventory levels. This technique involves using two bins or containers for each item in inventory.
The first bin, known as the primary or active bin, holds the current stock of the item. The second
bin, called the reserve bin, contains a predetermined quantity of the item that serves as a backup
or safety stock.

Strengths:

1. Simplicity: Two Bin Systems are easy to understand and implement. The concept of having
two bins for each item simplifies the process of monitoring inventory levels and reordering when
necessary.

2. Visual Management: The use of two bins provides a visual indicator of inventory levels. When
the primary bin is emptied, it acts as a signal that it is time to reorder or replenish the stock. This
visual management aspect helps in quickly identifying stockouts or shortages.

3. Cost-effective: This system can be cost-effective as it minimizes the need for advanced
inventory management technologies or software. It relies on visual cues and manual monitoring,
which can be suitable for smaller organizations with limited resources.

Weaknesses:

1. Lack of Precision: Two Bin Systems do not provide accurate information about the exact
quantity of inventory available. It only indicates when it is time to reorder or replenish, but it
doesn't provide detailed insights into the demand patterns or consumption rates.

2. Inefficient for Fast-Moving Items: This technique may not be suitable for items with high
demand or fast turnover rates. Since it relies on manual monitoring, it may lead to delays in
reordering or stockouts if the demand exceeds the predetermined quantity in the reserve bin.

3. Limited Scalability: Two Bin Systems are more suitable for managing smaller inventories or
items with relatively stable demand. As the organization's inventory grows, it becomes

31
increasingly challenging to monitor multiple bins manually, which can lead to inefficiencies and
inaccuracies.

Appropriate Applications:

Two Bin Systems can be effectively used in the following scenarios:

1. Slow-Moving or Low-Value Items: This technique works well for items with low demand or
items that have a low impact on the overall operations. It helps in maintaining adequate stock
levels without investing excessive time or resources.

2. Manual or Small-scale Operations: Organizations with limited resources or manual inventory

management processes can benefit from Two Bin Systems. It offers a simple and cost-effective
approach to maintain control over inventory levels.

3. Stable Demand Patterns: When the demand for items is relatively stable, Two Bin Systems
can be utilized to ensure a continuous supply without incurring unnecessary costs or
complexities.

Overall, while Two Bin Systems provide a straightforward and visual approach to inventory
management, they may not be suitable for organizations dealing with fast-moving items or
complex inventory requirements. It is important to consider the specific characteristics of the
items being managed and the scale of operations before implementing this technique.

32
xiii. Critically discuss the pros and cons of conducting stocktaking in a business
organization

Stocktaking is a crucial technique used by organizations to assess and control the flow of
materials and forecast future requirements. It involves the physical counting, verification, and
valuation of all inventory items held by a business at a particular point in time. This technique
helps businesses maintain accurate records of their stock levels and identify discrepancies
between physical stock and recorded stock. In this discussion, we will critically examine the pros
and cons of conducting stocktaking in a business organization.

Pros of Conducting Stocktaking:

1. Accurate Inventory Management: Stocktaking provides an accurate measure of the quantity

and value of inventory held by an organization. It allows businesses to identify any
discrepancies, such as stock losses due to theft, damage, or errors in recording. Accurate
inventory management aids in optimizing stock levels, preventing stockouts or overstocking, and
reducing holding costs.

2. Financial Reporting and Compliance: Stocktaking is essential for financial reporting purposes,
particularly in adhering to accounting standards such as International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) or Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Accurate valuation of
inventory ensures that financial statements present a true and fair view of the organization's
assets, enabling compliance with regulatory requirements and facilitating investor confidence.

3. Demand Forecasting: By conducting regular stocktaking, businesses gain insights into sales
patterns, seasonal demand fluctuations, and product popularity. This information can be used for
effective demand forecasting, enabling organizations to align their procurement, production, and
distribution processes with anticipated customer requirements. Accurate forecasting helps
minimize stock shortages, increase customer satisfaction, and reduce excess inventory.

4. Loss Prevention and Risk Mitigation: Stocktaking helps in detecting and preventing inventory
shrinkage, including theft and unauthorized use of company assets. Regular stock counts act as a
deterrent to employee theft and can highlight potential vulnerabilities in the supply chain. By

33
identifying risks and implementing appropriate control measures, organizations can minimize
financial losses and protect their assets.

Cons of Conducting Stocktaking:

1. Disruption to Operations: Conducting stocktaking requires temporarily ceasing certain

business activities or limiting access to inventory. This disruption can affect normal operations,
especially in businesses with large and complex inventory systems. The time and effort involved
in physical counting and reconciling stock records may result in productivity losses, particularly
if the process is not well-planned and executed.

2. Cost and Resource Intensity: Stocktaking can be a resource-intensive process, requiring

significant human resources, time, and equipment. Businesses must allocate manpower and
invest in suitable technologies, such as barcode scanners or inventory management software, to
streamline the stocktaking process. The associated costs can be substantial, particularly for
organizations with extensive inventories or multiple locations.

3. Potential Inaccuracy and Sampling Errors: Despite best efforts, stocktaking may still suffer
from inaccuracies due to human error or limitations in the counting process. Large inventories
may necessitate sample-based stock counts, introducing the possibility of sampling errors and
imprecise results. Inaccurate stock counts can lead to incorrect inventory valuations,
misinformed decision-making, and operational inefficiencies.

4. Limited Real-Time Visibility: Stocktaking typically provides a snapshot of inventory levels at

a specific point in time. As a result, businesses may lack real-time visibility into stock
availability or changes in demand. This can hinder proactive decision-making and timely
responses to supply chain disruptions or unexpected changes in customer demand.

Appropriate Applications of Stocktaking:

Stocktaking is particularly beneficial in industries where inventory accuracy is critical, such as

retail, manufacturing, and distribution. Businesses with high-value or perishable goods can use
stocktaking to minimize financial risks and operational inefficiencies. Moreover, organizations

34
subject to regulatory requirements or those seeking to optimize their supply chain can benefit
from regular stocktaking to ensure compliance and facilitate effective inventory management.

Conclusion

Stocktaking offers several advantages, including accurate inventory management, financial

reporting compliance, demand forecasting, and loss prevention. However, it also presents
challenges such as operational disruptions, resource intensity, potential inaccuracies, and limited
real-time visibility. Businesses must carefully consider the pros and cons of conducting
stocktaking and tailor its implementation to their specific industry, inventory complexity, and
operational requirements.

35
 REFERENCE:

Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2007). Judgmental forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of
forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 109-133). Springer.

Noor, S., Arshed, N., & Khan, M. (2020). Time Series Forecasting Using Moving Average and
Exponential Smoothing Techniques: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Management and
Research, 7(3), 205-217.

Azevedo, S. G., & Carvalho, M. S. (2020). Material requirements planning in the industry 4.0
context. Procedia Manufacturing, 49, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.043

Noor, M. M., & Nordin, N. (2020). ABC Analysis in Supply Chain Management. In
Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (4th ed., pp. 63-72). IGI Global.

Monden, Y. (1993). Toyota production system: An integrated approach to just-in-time. CRC

Press.

McDonald, M., & Mangan, J. (2016). Business logistics management: Theory and practice.
Kogan Page Publishers.

Elmaghraby, W., & Keskinocak, P. (2003). Supplier contracting and information asymmetry: A
review. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 407-422.

Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2005). Supplier selection and assessment for quality, cost, and
delivery performance: A review of existing models and development of a proposal for an
integrated framework. Omega, 33(3), 249-251.

36