Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND CONCLUSIONS
A higher prevalence of hypertension is reported among Afro-descendants We found that a higher prevalence of hypertension in Colombian
compared with other ethnic groups in high-income countries; however, Afro-descendants than other ethnic groups. This was principally asso-
there is a paucity of information in low- and medium-income countries. ciated with their lower mean educational level, an indicator of lower
socioeconomic status.
METHODS
We evaluated 3,745 adults from 3 ethnic groups (552 White, 2,746 Mestizos,
447 Afro-descendants) enrolled in the prospective population-based co-
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
hort study (PURE)—Colombia. We assessed associations between anthro-
pometric, socioeconomic, behavioral factors, and hypertension.
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of hypertension was 39.2% and was higher in
Afro-descendants (46.3%) than in Mestizos (37.6%) and Whites (41.5%),
differences that were due to the higher prevalence in Afro-descendant
women. Hypertension was associated with older age, increased body
mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio, independent
of ethnicity. Low education was associated with hypertension in all
ethnic groups, and particularly in Afro-descendants, for whom it was
the factor with the strongest association with prevalence. Notably, 70%
of Afro-descendants had a low level of education, compared with 52%
of Whites—26% of Whites were university graduates while only 7% of
Afro-descendants were. We did not find that education level alone had Keywords: Colombia; education level; ethnicity; hand grip strength;
a mediator effect, suggesting that it is not a causal risk factor for hyper- hypertension
tension but is an indicator of socioeconomic status, itself an important
determinant of hypertension prevalence. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpac051
The overall worldwide prevalence of hypertension in adults Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
is estimated to be 31.1% and the majority of the approxi- showing a greater prevalence of hypertension in African
mately 1.3 billion people affected live in low- and middle- Americans than non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanic and
income countries (LMICs).1,2 This disproportionate burden Asians.3–5 However, less information is available in LMICs
in LMICs could be explained by multiple sociodemographic, such as Colombia, a multiethnic middle-income country.6,7
economic, and behavioral factors. Ethnicity is one of the Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of
factors proposed to contribute to these differences, with ev- hypertension across the 3 ethnic groups that predominate
idence from large population studies such as the National in Colombia: White, Mestizo, and Afro-descendant, and
evaluate associations with socioeconomic, metabolic, an- We used the self-recognition of membership of one of the
thropometric, and behavioral factors which could contribute ethnic groups as Mestizo (a mix of White with aboriginal),
to potential differences. White, or Afro-descendant (including Black and a mix of
Black with White and Black with aboriginal), based on the
DANE recommendations.7 This implies that the individual
medications, was analyzed as a dichotomized categorical ethnicity group. Based on the results of the multivariate
variable. Participants were grouped according to their self- analysis, older age (>50 years) was associated with higher
identified ethnicity (Whites, Mestizos, Afro-descendant). prevalence of hypertension in all self-identified ethnicities.
We developed 3 paths for the statistical analysis. First, we In Mestizos, the upper tertile of BMI presented association
analyzed separately White, Mestizos, and Afro-descendant with higher prevalence of hypertension than participants
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants according to ethnic groups: Whites, Mestizo, and Afro-descendant.
Data are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD) or as number (n) and percentage (%). Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pres-
sure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HGS, hand grip strength; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; WHR,
waist-to-hip ratio; Na/K intake, sodium/potassium intake.
Lopez-Lopez et al.
American Journal of Hypertension
Univariate* Multivariate*
PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI)
Sex
Female Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Male 1.02 (0.83 to 1.26) 0.98 (0.88 to 1.08) 0.93 (0.75 to 1.16) 0.99 (0.81 to 1.2) 0.98 (0.89 to 1.07) 0.92 (0.75 to 1.13)
Age
<50 years Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
≥50 years 1.98 (1.57 to 2.48) 2.36 (2.12 to 2.64) 1.99 (1.6 to 2.47) 1.91 (1.52 to 2.4) 2.17 (1.94 to 2.43) 1.84 (1.46 to 2.32)
BMI (kg/m2)
F: (12.9–24.5); M: (16.4–23.2) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
F: (24.6–28.3); M: (23.3 -26.4) 1.27 (0.96 to 1.68) 1.32 (1.15 to 1.51) 1.27 (0.98 to 1.65) 1.03 (0.78 to 1.37) 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35) 1.09 (0.8 to 1.48)
F: (28.4–76.8); M: (26.5–66.6) 1.69 (1.31 to 2.18) 1.67 (1.47 to 1.89) 1.35 (1.05 to 1.74) 1.34 (0.98 to 1.82) 1.28 (1.08 to 1.51) 1.03 (0.7 to 1.51)
WC (cm)
F: (47.1–79.5); M: (45–83.0) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
F: (79.6–89.0); M: (83.1–92.0) 1.84 (1.38 to 2.45) 1.28 (1.12 to 1.47) 1.43 (1.07 to 1.92) 1.49 (1.06 to 2.08) 1.08 (0.92 to 1.26) 1.25 (0.87 to 1.8)
F: (89.1–150.7); M: (92.1–138) 1.93 (1.45 to 2.55) 1.82 (1.6 to 2.06) 1.56 (1.19 to 2.05) 1.34 (0.9 to 2.0) 1.3 (1.07 to 1.56) 1.27 (0.8 to 2.03)
WHR
F: (0.46–0.83); M: (0.55–0.91) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
F: (0.84–0.88); M: (0.92–0.96) 1.54 (1.18 to 2.01) 1.16 (1.01 to 1.32) 1.32 (1.04 to 1.68) 1.1 (0.82 to 1.48) 0.99 (0.87 to 1.14) 1.23 (0.93 to 1.62)
F: (0.89–2.22); M: (0.97–2.38) 1.58 (1.22 to 2.05) 1.5 (1.33 to 1.7) 1.33 (1.02 to 1.72) 1.07 (0.78 to 1.45) 1.01 (0.87 to 1.16) 0.9 (0.66 to 1.24)
HGW
F: (0.40–1.45); M: (0.57–1.61) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
F: (0.31–0.39); M: (0.45–0.56) 1.08 (0.83 to 1.4) 1.1 (0.97 to 1.26) 1.37 (1.04 to 1.8) 0.86 (0.67 to 1.09) 0.91 (0.8 to 1.03) 1.12 (0.86 to 1.47)
F: (0.05–0.30); M: (0.11–0.44) 1.25 (0.98 to 1.6) 1.5 (1.33 to 1.69) 1.55 (1.19 to 2.0) 0.83 (0.65 to 1.07) 1.01 (0.89 to 1.14) 1.18 (0.89 to 1.57)
Education level
High Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Middle 1.45 (1.07 to 1.96) 1.0 (0.81 to 1.25) 1.16 (0.64 to 2.09) 1.57 (1.16 to 2.11) 1.11 (0.9 to 1.36) 1.44 (0.85 to 2.41)
Low 1.34 (1.02 to 1.74) 1.31 (1.09 to 1.57) 1.81 (1.06 to 3.09) 1.62 (1.21 to 2.17) 1.46 (1.21 to 1.75) 2.14 (1.3 to 3.53)
Location
Urban Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Rural 0.8 (0.64 to 0.99) 0.89 (0.8 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.73 to 1.15) 0.95 (0.74 to 1.23) 1.01 (0.9 to 1.13) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07)
CI were adjusted by age, location, income, home cooking with solid fuels, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and handgrip adjusted by bodyweight. Bold values are
statistically significant. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference, WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; HGW, hand grip strength adjusted by weight; F , female; M, male; PR,
*Prevalence ratios and 95% CI from the univariate and multivariate using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. In multivariate analysis prevalence ratios and 95%
health system a lower educational level, and a higher edu-
Reference
Reference
curate indicator of social inequality21 and as we previously
reported, social inequality is an important risk factor for
0.85 (0.58 to 1.24) ethnicity, and that this association is mediated by education
Multivariate*
PR (95% CI)
Reference
Reference
Mestizo
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Yes
No
High Reference
Middle 1.53 (1.03 to 2.26) 1.13 (0.85 to 1.49) 1.87 (0.94 to 3.72)
Low 1.49 (1.03 to 2.14) 1.5 (1.16 to 1.93) 2.82 (1.44 to 5.53)
Education level Male White Male Mestizo Male Afro-descendant
PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI)
High Reference
Middle 1.76 (1.14 to 2.74) 1.06 (0.78 to 1.45) 0.82 (0.34 to 1.95)
Low 1.73 (1.03 to 2.91) 1.35 (1.03 to 1.76) 1.33 (0.6 to 2.94)
The table shows the association obtained from Poisson regression models with robust standard errors separately by sex and self-recognized
ethnicity. PRs and 95% CI were adjusted by age, location, income, home cooking with solid fuels, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-
to-hip ratio and handgrip adjusted by bodyweight. Bold values are statistically significant. Abbreviations: PR, prevalence ratio; 95% CI, 95%
confidence interval.
Table 4. Association between self-recognized ethnicity and Carlos Cure; Aristides Sotomayor; Alvaro Rico; Eric
hypertension mediated by education level. Hernandez-Triana; Myriam Duran; Fresia Cotes by the
Proportion of the mediator effect
help with the development of study in the Departments of
Model estimate (95% CI) p-value
Colombia.
Desvigne-Nickens P, Gavini N, Go AS, Hyman DJ, Kimmel PL, 16. Ordúñez P, Kaufman JS, Benet M, Morejon A, Silva LC, Shoham DA,
Margolis KL, Miller 3rd ER, Mills KT, Mensah GA, Navar AM, Cooper RS. Blacks and whites in the Cuba have equal prevalence of
Ogedegbe G, Rakotz MK, Thomas G, Tobin JN, Wrigth JT, Yoon SSS, hypertension: confirmation from a new population survey. BMC Public
Cutler JA. Research needs to improve hypertension treatment and con- Health. 2013;13:169.
trol in African Americans. Hypertension 2016; 68:1066–1072. 17. Gravlee CC, Dressler WW, Bernard HR. Skin color, social classification,
5. Yoon SS, Gu Q, Nwankwo T, Wright JD, Hong Y, Burt V. Trends in and blood pressure in southeastern Puerto Rico. Am J Public Health.