Professional Documents
Culture Documents
College of Nursing
COURSE OUTLINE
Note to learners: The instructor for this course does not retain historical copies of course
outline or syllabus. I urge you to retain this Course Outline for your future reference.
Learner Responsibilities: Learners should have a copy of the University of Cebu student’s
manual and refer to it for additional information regarding withdrawals, exemptions, grading
systems, assignments, missed quizzes, tests, and exams, supplemental privileges, and academic
dishonesty. Learners are required to be diligent during the course study, must be prepared in
class, carefully read the course outline and homework assignments as given. Learners are
expected to be updated with the course by joining the online classroom and the WhatsApp
group initiated by the instructor. Historically, learner performance shows a strong relationship
between regular attendance and success in this course.
Course Description: This course teaches learners the concepts, principles and skills that are
required for informatics in the health care environment. The importance and impact of health
informatics in documentation, evidenced-based practice and education and research will be
explored. The focus of this course will be on the use of information systems and technology to
manage and document information related to health care and clinical practice.
Announcements Group
Assessment Images
Assignment Journals
Audio MS Office
Video Conference Virtual Simulations Case Studies
Blogs Portfolios
Vlogs Presentations
Content Market tools Self & Peer Assessment
Messages Surveys
Discussion Board Task
Email Tests
Glossary Video
Goal Performance Self-Reflection
Kahoot Classmarker
Internet Google Class
Computer / Laptop Smart Phone
Expectations of Learners:
• Learners are expected to follow the University of Cebu (UCLM) policies regarding
academic performance. Refer to the policy and student handbook.
o In addition, learners are expected to access the following regularly and are
responsible for being aware of the course content.
o Course announcements (google class/WhatsApp group)
o Course content
• This course requires that any electronic communications be sent using the registered
email account.
• Responsible for the necessary hardware / software required in this class.
Testing Policy
All students are required to meet the testing requirements as reflected on the evaluation
system of this course outline.
Students who miss an examination without a valid reason will automatically receive a zero (0)
grade for that examination. There are no “make up” or supplemental exams for a failed exam.
The following are the acceptable reasons for missing an exam in this course.
1. Sickness. An official doctors note stating that you are not healthy enough to write the
exam must be submitted.
2. Funeral attendance. Proof of attendance with the date of the ceremony that clearly
listed the learners name must be submitted.
3. Courtroom appearance. A certificate of attendance or official court summons with the
date of your required attendance must be submitted.
4. Religious observances. The university recognizes and values spiritual diversity and will
accommodate learners who, by reason of religious obligations, are unable to attend an
examination, test, or other mandatory academic activity.
Assignment Format:
All files submitted in the online platform or through email must be saved starting with your
surname and the name of the assignment. For example, if your name is Juan Lopez, you will
save the Word document as Lopez Literature Review.
All files must be submitted through online classroom or as per instruction of the teacher of this
course. Assignments will not be accepted via WhatsApp and other means not approved by the
instructor.
All plagiarized assignments are given a grade of zero (0) and the learner will receive a grade of F
(0-49%) in the course.
Any assignment submission that is submitted in this course must be original and must be the
learners own. Copying other students’ assignment or paraphrasing another students paper or
submitting a previously submitted assignment is not allowed. Submitting other learners
assignment as your own is under the definition of plagiarism.
See: www.owl.purdue.edu to learn more about plagiarism guidelines and citation basics or visit
the following links to learn about citations and referencing on APA 7th edition format.
• http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf
Students must submit the Plagiarism Contract to the instructor on or before week 2 (See
Appendix A).
It is the student’s responsibility to read and review the UCLM’s Academic Honesty Policy,
student code of conduct, discipline and standards.
This course uses the APA 7th Edition for citation and references on all its assignments, posting
and submissions. You are required to use the APA 7th Edition formatting style. Preparing APA
style is challenging and requires development and mastery of your writing skills.
To know more about APA 7th Edition formatting style for references and citations please go to
www.owl.purdue.edu for more information about how to properly do citations and references.
Grammarly
Grammarly is a grammar correction and plagiarism checker software used by your instructor in
this course. It provides the instructor with a plagiarism report or similarity report. Please make
sure that you check your work against websites and other student papers for similarities before
submission to your instructor. Please make sure that you are citing your sources well.
You only have one chance to submit your assignment and your instructor will run a plagiarism
check on your assignment.
A&B
Feb. 21, 2023
Online Prelim Exam (Multiple Choice)
Exam starts @ 0000 to 2359 of __________
PST
To be arranged
* You are given 90 mins to complete the
examination.
* Test coverage: Unit 1 & 2
A&B
Mar. 9, 2023
A&B Online Midterm Exam (Multiple Choice)
Mar. 20, Exam starts @ 0000 to 2359 of __________
2023 PST
* You are given 90 mins to complete the
C&D examination.
Mar. 21, * Test coverage: Unit 1 - 4
2023
A&B
Competency Development in the Use of
March 23,
Nursing Informatics and Technology
2023
• Training and development in e-learning and
nursing informatics
Note:
• Schedules may change due to uncontrolled circumstances.
• Refer to instructor provided link for itemized list of readings and resources for each lesson
• You are expected to review, reflect on and integrate relevant competencies to demonstrate
you your skills, knowledge and application for every assignment.
• All assignment submission should be in APA 7 format.
• All rubrics include and reflect relevant PH, US and Canadian competencies in nursing
informatics.
• Monday is the start of the week for this course in PST.
There are a variety of information systems that are being used in health care, particularly in
nursing. Do a search in the world wide web and look for different kinds of health care systems
or information systems. Choose one and review the site using the guidelines found below for
evaluating websites.
Include the following information when you make your website critique:
1. Provide the universal resource locator (URL) of the site, a short overview of the sites
content and the date of the website review.
2. What are the major categories of information covered on the site?
3. Who is/are the audience for the site? What clues define the audience? Provide evidence
such as tone, voice, language and assumed knowledge.
4. Provide the hypertext links on the website page? Describe how the various links relate
to the main theme? Are the links consistent with the main theme? Or does the site have
personal links? Is it a mix of various personal interest of an individual?
5. What kinds of graphics that are found on the site? Include a detailed description. How
do they make the site easier to use or help explain concepts? Do the images support
text information or do they stand alone? Do they overuse graphics to the point of
distraction? Who are the various audiences for these images? What are your clues?
6. What cues or evidences do you have about the credibility of the site and the
information? From what organizations or institutions does the site originate? Some
websites or apps can create a legit sounding name or logo, what beyond the surface
credibility gives you clues about the reliability of the site and its information? If the site
is sponsored, are they involved in the research? Give evidence. Does the site have built
in bias? For example, is the website and advertisement for a service or a product? Does
the site have a specific social or political agenda? Having sponsors whether private or
government is not bad but is the sponsor “tricky” about its alliances?
7. Create broad observations about what you learned about the topic you choose to
investigate by exploring the site. What did you learn about exploring internet resources?
What reflection you can give about the usefulness and value of the information you
found on the internet while being aware that you have only looked at one site related to
Length of paper: Maximum of 5 pages not including the title page and reference page, double
spaced, Calibri, 12-point font, APA 7.
File Name: All files submitted in the online platform or through email must be saved starting
with your surname and the name of the assignment. Example Lopez Website Critique
Assignment
This is a 2-part activity. Part 1, the learner will participate in a virtual gaming simulation (VGS)
created Ryerson University. The learner will perform and finish successfully in the TeamWorks
simulation (link is provided below). The learner can perform multiple times or may explore the
simulation before downloading and submitting the summary report.
https://de.ryerson.ca/games/nursing/hospital/index.html
Part 2 of this assignment is to write a self-reflection discussion. The learner is expected to write
about the usefulness, impact, and the future of the use of technology in nursing based on the
TeamWorks simulation. The learner is expected to write the emotions, thoughts, and
reflections as a result of playing the virtual gaming simulation. In writing self-reflection, you are
not expected to include a review of literature nor defining terms is not an expectation of self-
reflective discussions. Please feel free to write about your experience with the TeamWorks
Length of paper: Maximum of 3 pages not including the title page and reference page, double
spaced, Calibri, 12-point font, APA 7.
File Name: All files submitted in the online platform or through email must be saved starting
with your surname and the name of the assignment. Example Lopez Self-reflection Discussion
Assignment
Note: Submit your summary report and reflection together in one file. Place the summary
report after the reference page of your self-reflection paper. See rubrics in the appendix C.
Plagiarism Contract:
Carefully read the statement below. By indicating your signature and date you agree with this
contract.
The instructor of this course has informed me on how to avoid plagiarism and the
outcomes for committing plagiarism in this course.
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
Course Name: ____________________________
Course Code: ____________________________
Grade Possible
Indicator Score
Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Below Standard Points
Contents & All questions Most questions Some 10 points
Ideas required are answered. required are questions required
The website / app answered. The to answer are
critique shows superior website / app omitted. The
insight & application of critiques show good website / app
content. The evidence insight & application critique is poor
provided are superior of course content. and does not
in quality and supports The evidence apply to course
the points discussed provided are to content. Evidence
and or opinions made. support the points given does not
(10 Points) discussed and support the points
opinions made are discussed and
moderate. opinions made.
(8 points) (4 points)
Organization The assignment was The assignment is The assignment 10 points
clearly developed. somewhat is not clearly
Flows well together developed. The developed. It is
with good transition. presentation of vague. Choppy.
Organized well. Very information is in Fragmented. Does
creative. Does not use logical sequence. not have a good
question and answer Needs better flow if ideas. Not
format. transition from idea creative.
(10 points) to idea. Somewhat (3 points)
creative.
(6 points)
APA 7th Applies APA 7th Somewhat applies APA 7th edition 5 points
Edition edition to format, the APA 7th edition to format is not
grammar, sentence format, grammar, applied, grammar,
structure, language, sentence structure, sentence
citing and referencing language, citing and structure,
to written summary. referencing to language, citation,
(5 points) written summary. and references to
(2 points) written summary.
(0 points)
Total 25 points
Grade Possible
Indicator Score
Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Below Standard Points
Making a There is a personal Limited personal No personal 10 points
connection connection, connection. Self and connection.
incorporating self and emotions are Writers’ self and
emotions, to the story mentioned, but not emotions are not
relevant to the incorporated. incorporated.
assigned VGS. (8 points) (2 points)
(10 points)
Reflective Goes beyond The experience The 10 points
Writing describing an in the simulation is experience is not
experience to self- described. Shows described. There
reflection. Shows limited evidence of is no self-
clear evidence of interpreting and reflection or
interpreting and analyzing thoughts introspection.
analyzing thoughts and feelings, the self (2 points)
and feelings, the self, and the story.
and the story. (8 points)
(10 points)
Follows What is written Limited match No match 5 points
directions matches the assigned between what is between what is
simulation game. written and the written and the
Summary report and assigned simulation assigned
Self-reflection game. Summary simulation game.
assignment is report and Self- (1 point). Only
submitted as one file. reflection the self-reflection
(5 points) assignment are is submitted,
submitted in 2 summary report
separate files. is not attached.
(3 point)
Total 25 points
Grade Possible
Indicator Score
Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Below Standard Points
Online Relevant Discussion Inconsistent 10
Discussion discussion posting postings usually discussion
Posting that augment consistent, and postings that are
learning. relevant. weak and non-
(10 points) (6 points) relevant.
(3 points)
Higher Makes use of Contributes to Reluctantly 10
order, problem-solving, discussions and participates in
critical critical thinking and completes discussions and
thinking insightful in assignments assignments are
skills discussions and (6 points) inadequate
assignments. (3 points)
(10 points)
Contribution Involvement in Participates in Has a little 5
discussions is discussions and contribution to
consistent and assignments are discussions and
assignments are completed on time. not all
completed and on (3 points) assignments are
time. completed on
(5 points) time.
(1 point)
Total 25 points