Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Patricia Evangelista
Patricia Evangelista
Unit 2!
CHRISTIAN ROGELIO AGRICULA
Who is the author? What is the background of the author? Is he or
she an expert in the field? Is he or she credible? Try researching in
the internet to know the authors.
Yes it does! I can totally see that difference what is she point out
either of her opinion and fact, but I can only see the most is her
proven fact. Yes, I can't deny that, but her personal opinion is
really agreeable to be honest.
Is the information objective? Are all different points of view
presented in the article?
Most likely yes, because she's targeting or talking about the priest
who doesn't agree with artificial contraceptive. I mean look with
that mentality with the people who are running this government is
getting fucked up, I mean they agree the artificial contraceptive is
evil because it's man-made because it leads to a "culture of
death", and she point the gentlemen of the Church appear to have
no problems with anesthesia and chemotherapy and the varying
unnatural tools of the medical profession, and yet they have been
known to take insulin shots and migraine medication for the relief
of their physical suffering. No, not all different point of view are
presented in this article.
What is the main claim or assertion of the writer in the entire
article?
That the gentlemen of the Church won't agree with the artificial
contraceptives, she only pointing out that our we are over-
populated country and the women have right to take some
because that what she want . the Church is afraid of losing its
own moral authority to control the creation of a state where every
citizen is allowed a choice, even when that citizen is a woman.
What statements or information are used to support the
conclusion?