You are on page 1of 8

CORRELATION BETWEEN SYSTEMIC RISK FACTORS AND DIABETIC

MACULAR EDEMA IN DIABETES MELLITUS


Dian Paramitasari, Erwin Iskandar
Department of Ophtalmology Padjadjaran University
National Eye Center, Cicendo Eye Hospital

ABSTRACT
Introduction : Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the major cause of visual impairment in
diabetic patients. It is a consequence of abnormal vascular permeability in Diabetic
Retinopathy (DR). Several systemic risk factors have been associated with development of
DME, such as age, duration of diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.
Purpose : To identify the correlation betweem systemic risk factors and DME among
patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) managed in National Eye Center, Cicendo Eye
Hospital, Indonesia.
Method : A cross sectional study, included 67 eyes from 36 patients with DR, based on
inclusion and exclusion criteria. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging was done
to determine DME status. Demographic data were collected, and each patient underwent
laboratory examination with sample taken from peripheral venous blood extraction and urine
sample colection.
Results : There were significant differences of DM duration and hypertension stages
between DME and non DME patient (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were
found between DME and non-DME patients (p > 0.05) on other demographic data (age,
gender, DM type, DM medications), metabolic blood parameters (glycemia, HbA1c, total
colesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, ureum, creatinine, SGOT, SGPT, Hemoglobin) and
urine sample analysis (protein, glucose).
Conclusion : Duration of DM and hypertension stages were found to be correlated with
occurence of DME in this study.
Keywords : Diabetic Macular Edema, Diabetes Mellitus, Systemic Risk Factors

Introduction vision-threatening retinopathy,


Globally, an estimated 424.9 including the presence of DME.1–5
million adults were living with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is
diabetes in 2017. This number of a condition of macular thickening
people with diabetes is rising and resulting from diabetic retinopathy. It
expected to reach 628.6 million is a consequence of abnormal
people in 2045. In Indonesia there vascular permeability in DR. DME
were over 10 million cases of diabetes can occur in eyes with a wide
documented in 2017, with prevalence spectrum of underlying retinopathy,
of diabetes in adults reaching 6.7%. ranging from mild, moderate, or
The combination of increasing severe Non Proliferative Diabetic
prevalence of diabetes and increasing Retinopathy (NPDR) to Proliferative
lifespans in many populations with Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR).
diabetes may raise the number of Extrafoveal foci of retinal thickening
complications that it caused. Diabetic and hard exudates may not cause
Macular Edema (DME) is the major symptoms or affect visual acuity, but
cause of visual impairment in diabetic DME that involves or threatens the
patients, accounting for 12% of new center of the macula carries a signifi-
cases of blindness anually. Over one- cant risk of vision loss.6,7
third of all people with diabetes have As a type of microangiopathy
signs of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), resulting from the chronic effects of
and a third of these are afflicted with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), DR shares
similarities with the microvascular examination time, having other retinal
alterations that occur in other tissues vascular disease, hazy ocular media
vulnerable to DM such as kidneys and precluding good view of the retina
peripheral nerves. DME share many and poor quality OCT scans with
common risk factors with DR. signal strength of 5 or below.
Generally the risk factors can be DME was defined as a Central
classified as non-modifiable and Subfield Thickness (CST) ≥ 2
modifiable. Non modifiable include standard deviations thicker than sex-
duration of diabetes, older age, and specific normal values, which
pregnancy. Hyperglycemia, HbA1c corresponds with CST ≥ 305 µm for
levels, hypertension, and male patients and ≥ 290 µm for
dyslipidemia are known to be female patients as seen on OCT scans.
modifiable risk factors. Correlation of The OCT was taken with Zeiss
serum creatinine level and albminuria Cirrus-5000 HD OCT (Heidelberg
with DME has also been reported.2,8,9 Engineering, Germany), using
Identifying the risk factors standard Macular Cube. This type of
associated with development of DME OCT can take up to 68.000 A-Scans
has important value for potentially per second, with 5µm axial
improving DME prevention strategies resolution.
and improving treatment response. Demographic data was also
The purpose of this study was to collected. Peripheral venous blood
identify systemic risk factors extraction was carried out at fasting
correlated with the presence of DME time and 2 hours post prandial to
among patients with DM managed in determine serum levels of metabolic
National Eye Center, Cicendo Eye parameters. The searched parameters
Hospital, Indonesia. Aiming to include blood glucose, glycated
indentify those risk fectors are hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglyceride,
expected to assist more thorough total cholesterol, low-density
examinations and more lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),
comprehensive treatment in the daily high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
management of DR. (HDL-C), ureum, creatinine, serum
glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase
Methods (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic
This was a hospital based cross- transaminase (SGPT), hemoglobin
sectional study, conducted between (Hb). Urine sample was also taken to
December 2017 and January 2018. measure urine protein and glucose
This study included 67 eyes from 36 level.
patients with retinopathy at any stage Statistical analysis were carried
attributable to DM. The patients must out using SPSS statistics. Chi-square
be able and willing to completed test were used for comparative data
Optical Coherence Tomography analysis. P-values less than 0.05 were
(OCT) and laboratory examination considered statistically significant.
with sample taken from peripheral
venous blood extraction and urine Results
sample colection. We excluded 71 eyes from 36 patients with type
patients with pregnancy at the 2 DM were firstly included according
to previously stated criteria. 4 eyes (p < 0.05). Most patients with DME
who met our exlusion criteria were were presented with stage 2
finally excluded. 67 eyes from 36 hypertension, meanwhile patients
patients with DME and no DME were with non DME were mostly presented
finally analysed. 32 of them presented with stage 1 hypertension. DME was
with DME according to OCT-based mostly diagnosed in patients with
defined endpoints. All included duration of DM more than 10 years.
patients had peripheral venous blood No statistically significant
extraction, urine sample colection, differences were found between DME
and OCT examination done. and non-DME patients (p > 0.05) on
Demographic data (Table 1) reported metabolic blood parameters
no significant diferences (p > 0.05) on (glycemia, HbA1c, total colesterol,
age, gender, DM type, and DM HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, Ureum,
medications between both groups. Creatinine, SGOT/AST, SGPT/ALT,
There were significant differences of Hemoglobin) and urine sample
DM duration and hypertension stages analysis (protein, glucose) (Table 2).
between DME and non DME patient

Table 1. Demographic Data and Characteristics of Diabetic Patients


Diagnosis
DME Non DME
p-value
n= 32 n=35
n % n %
Age (years)
≤ 40 0 0.0 3 8.6
41 – 50 12 37.5 7 20.0
0.116
51 – 60 15 46.9 20 57.1
61 – 70 3 9.4 5 14.3
> 70 2 6.3 0 0.0
Gender
Male 17 53.1 20 57.1 0.466
Female 15 46.9 15 42.9
DM Type
Type 1 DM 0 0.0 2 5.7 0.246
Type 2 DM 29 90.6 27 77.1
Duration of DM (years)
≤5 6 18.8 13 37.1
5-10 6 18.8 7 20.0 0.030
> 10 tahun 13 40.6 7 20.0
No Data 4 12.5 7 20.0
DM Medications
Regular 15 46.9 22 62.9
0.161
Not regular 10 31.3 5 14.3
No data 4 12.5 2 5.7
Hypertension
No Hypertension 7 21.9 5 14.3
Pre Hypertension 6 18.8 3 8.6
0.030
Hypertension stage 1 4 12.5 15 42.9
Hypertension stage 2 10 31.3 6 17.1
Urgency/emergency 2 6.3 0 0.0
Table 2. Blood and Urine Examination Results
Diagnosis
DME Non DME
p-value
n= 32 n=35
n % n %
Triglyceride
Normal (< 150 mg/dL) 18 56.3 16 45.7 0.269
High (≥ 150 mg/dL) 14 43.8 19 54.3
Total Cholesterol
Normal (< 200 mg/dL) 12 37.5 9 25.7 0.219
High (≥ 200 mg/dL) 20 62.5 26 74.3
LDL Cholesterol
Normal (< 100 mg/dL) 11 34.4 12 34.3 0.598
High (≥ 100 mg/dL) 21 65.6 23 65.7
HDL Cholesterol
Female
Low (< 50 mg/dL) 10 31.3 12 34.3
Normal (≥ 50 mg/dL) 5 15.6 3 8.6 0.660
Male
Low (< 40 mg/dL) 11 34.4 10 28.6
Normal (≥ 40 mg/dL) 6 18.8 10 28.6
2 hour PP Blood Glucose
Normal (< 200 mg/dL) 11 34.4 16 45.7 0.244
High (≥ 200 mg/dL) 21 65.6 19 54.3
Fasting Blood Glucose
Normal (< 126 mg/dL) 11 34.4 12 34.3 0.598
High (≥ 126 mg/dL) 21 65.6 23 65.7
HbA1c
Newly Diagnosed DM
Normal (< 6.5%) 3 9.4 3 8.6
High ( ≥ 6.5%) 4 12.5 5 14.3 0.336
Controlled Patient
Normal (< 7%) 3 9.4 9 25.7
High ( ≥ 7%) 22 68.8 18 51.4
Ureum
Low (< 10 mg/dL) 2 6.3 2 5.7
0.107
Normal (10-50 mg/dL) 14 43.8 24 68.6
High (> 50 mg/dL) 16 50.0 9 25.7
Creatinin
Female
Normal (0.5-0.9 mg/dL) 6 18.8 7 20.0
High (> 0.9 mg/dL) 9 28.1 8 22.9
0.311
Male
Low (< 0.6 mg/dL) 0 0.0 4 11.4
Normal (0.6-1.1 mg/dL) 5 15.6 7 20.0
High (>1.1 mg/dL) 12 37.5 9 25.7
SGOT
Female
Normal (< 32 U/L) 13 40.6 14 40.0
High (≥ 32 U/L) 33 103.1 1 2.9 0.291
Male
Normal (< 38 U/L) 15 46.9 20 57.1
High (≥ 38 U/L) 2 6.3 0 0.0
SGPT
Female
Normal (< 31 U/L) 11 34.4 13 37.1
High (≥ 31 U/L) 4 12.5 2 5.7 0.435
Male
Normal (< 41 U/L) 17 53.1 18 51.4
High (≥ 41 U/L) 0 0.0 2 5.7
Hemoglobin (Hb)
Female
Low (< 12 g/dL) 5 15.6 6 17.1
Normal (12-16 g/dL) 10 31.3 9 25.7 0.953
Male
Low (< 13g/dL) 11 34.4 12 34.3
Normal (13-18 g/dL) 6 18.8 8 22.9
Urine Protein
(-) 3 9.4 3 8.6
(+) 8 25.0 14 40.0
0.416
(++) 10 31.3 7 20.0
(+++) 6 18.8 9 25.7
(++++) 5 15.6 2 5.7
Urine Glucose
(-) 5 15.6 12 34.3
(+) 11 34.4 9 25.7 0.161
(++) 3 9.4 6 17.1
(+++) 13 40.6 8 22.9

Discussion Winconsin Epidemiologic Study of


DME represent a common cause of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) find direct
visual loss among people with DM. DME association of increased prevalence of DR,
results from retinal vascular in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with disease
hyperpermeability and other alterations in duration. In case of DME, a study
retinal microenvironment. The exact conducted by An et al also found higher
pathogenesis of DME remains poorly prevalence of DME as the duration of DM
understood. Vascular endothelial growth increases.5,7
factor (VEGF) is believed to be a key Significant difference was also found in
mediator in the pathogenesis of DME. It and hypertension stages (p 0.03) between
promotes angiogenesis and causes a DME and non DME patients. Most of the
breakdown in the blood retinal barrier patients with DME were presented with
(BRB) by damaging the tight junctions stage 2 hypertension (31.3%), meanwhile
between retinal endothelial cells. These patients with non DME were mostly
tight junctions are critical to the function presented with stage 1 hypertension
and regulation of the BRB. The breakdown (42.9%).
of BRB then results in accumulation of Starling’s Law of the Capillary stated
plasma proteins such as albumin which that fluid filtration is related directly to the
exert a high oncotic pressure in the neural forces that drive fluid across the vessel
interstitium, leading to interstitial edema. wall, such as blood pressure. Systemic
As mentioned before, some systemic risk arterial hypertension known to contributes
factors has been implicated in the to the disruption of normal autoregulary
development of DME, such as process of retinal vasculature. The
hyperglycemia, hypertension, and importance of this concept has been related
hyperlipidemia. These factors ultimately to DME.2,13
contribute to an increase in VEGF Martin-merino et al found that although
expression, resulting in breakdown of the diagnosis of hypertension did not showed
BRB. 6,10–12 association with DME occurance, high
In this study, significant difference was systolic blood pressure, ≥160 mmHg,
found in DM duration (p 0.03) between doubled the risk of DME. In the United
DME and non DME patients. DME was Kingdom prospective diabetes study
mostly diagnosed in patients with duration (UKPDS), tight blood pressure control,
of DM more than 10 years (40.6%). The with target blood pressure <150/85 mmHg,
correspond to reducing the risk of macular edema. Diabetes control and
deterioration of visual acuity by 47%. complications trial (DCCT) showed
American Diabetes Association intensive glycemic control was associated
recommended blood pressure control below reduction in the incidence of DME at the
135/85 for prevention and treatment of end of the trial and 4 years later compared
DME.2,5,12,14 with those in the conventional
No significant diferences (p > 0.05) were group.3,13,14,16
found on DM type and regularity of DM Consistent with findings in this study,
medications between both groups. Lee at al also found that no single lipid
According to an epidemiological study, measurement had been consistently found
prevalence of DME among patients with to be associated with DME. Patients with
type 1 diabetes was between 4.2 and 7.9 %, hyperlipidemia may also have an increased
and between 1.4 and 12.8 % in type 2 tendency for macular edema formation
diabetes. Other study found that patients when serum lipoproteins accumulate in the
treated with both oral anti-diabetic drugs or retina and exert the osmotic influences that
insulin had a greater occurance of DME. draw water out of retinal vessels and cause
The link between anti-diabetic drugs and retinal thickening. Data from the Early
the increased risk of DME maybe because Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
anti-diabetic drug use merely indicates the (ETDRS) showed a twofold increase in risk
severity of diabetes and, thereby, greater of DME in patients with total serum
historical hyperglycaemic exposure2,14,15 cholesterol greater than 240 mg/dl. High
In this study, there were no statistically total cholesterol and high LDL-C level has
significant differences found between DME been found to increased the risk for
and non-DME patients (p > 0.05) on developing DME in other study. Better
metabolic blood parameters (glycemia, control of LDL-C also had resulted in
HbA1c, total colesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, improvement of DME. This suggest that
triglyceride, Ureum, Creatinine, AST, lipids may play role in the development of
ALT, Hemoglobin, Leukocyte, DME, although this association is not
Thrombocyte) and urine sample analysis clear.2,11,13,14
(protein, glucose). Diabetic nephropathy is closely
Poor control of blood glucose levels has associated to DR and DME, as many of the
been associated with deterioration in DME. pathologic processes affecting
This study shows that, although not microvasculature in DR are likely to be
statistically significant, most patients with causative of diabetic nephropathy as well.
DME are controlled patient with HbA1c Greater severity of renal dysfunction is
level ≥ 7% (68.8 %). Earlier study by correlated with the occurence of DME.2,10
Sovani et al in Cicendo national eye In this study, there were no significant
hospital found that increased of HbA1c difference found between blood ureum,
level by 1% caused 36% increased risk of creatinine, and protein urine level with
DME in patiens with type 2 DM. Martin- DME occurence. Chi-Jui Jeng et all found
merino et al found that majority of patients that the overall DME risk did not differ in a
with DME had poor HbA1c control statistically significant manner between
(HbA1c ≥ 7%) at first diabetes diagnosis. DM patients with and without diabetic
They also found significantly higher risk nephropathy. Merino et al found that
for developing DME in patients with proteinuria did not show a significant
HbA1c level ≥ 10%. WESDR also showed association with DME. Other study also
that higher glycosylated hemoglobin are report no relation between proteinuria and
impotant risk factor in DME development. DME during first 10 years of diabetes,
Agrawal et al also found association although association was shown after 25
between poor glycaemic control with focal years. 9,12,14
This study found no significant correlation of DME and systemic risk
difference between SGOT and SGPT level factors from vitreoretional outpatients in a
with DME. Findings of a study by Figureas- single eye hospital, not representative of
roca et al are consistent with what we found people with DM in general populations.
in this study, that there were no association Scanty sample size and short course of
between SGOT and SGPT with occurence study time remain as main limitations.
of DME.17 More studies are warranted with increased
Althogh there were no significant sample sizes and study time in order to
difference in hemoglobin level between further understand the correlation between
DME and non DME patient in this study, systemic risk factors and DME.
anemia is another risk factors thought to
worsen DME. Studies have shown that Hb Conclusion
levels < 12 g/dL result in doubling of the In diabetes mellitus patients with DR
risk of DR. Increase in Hb levels appears to that comes to National Eye Center, Cicendo
improve DME by increasing oxygenation Eye Hospital, some factors were correlated
of the retina and ultimately less ischemia- with occurence of DME. Hypertension and
induced VEGF production.11 duration of diabetes were found to be differ
Several limitations of the present study in statistically significant manner between
include there were missing data for certain DME and non DME patients. To minimize
variables in a small number of patients and the occurrence of DME and improve
this should be taken into account when treatment outcomes, good control of
interpreting the results. This study provided hypertension is needed.

6. Wiley HE, Chew EY, Ferris FL.


REFFERENCES Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
and diabetic macular edema. In:
1. World Heatlh Organization. Global Schachat AP, editor. Ryan’s Retina.
report on diabetes. 2016th ed. France: 6th ed. China: Elsevier; 2018.
World Health Organization;
7. American Academy of Ophtalmology.
2. Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Retina and Vitreous. In: Basic and
Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, Clinical Science Course. 2016th–
diabetic macular edema and related 2017th ed. USA: American Academy
vision loss. Eye Vis. 2015 Dec;2(1). of Ophtalmology;

3. Agarwal A, Garg V. Role of systemic 8. Ghosh S, Bansal P, Shejao H, Hegde


risk factors in diabetic macular edema R, Roy D, Biswas S. Correlation of
in type 2. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. morphological pattern of optical
2015;14(10):01–4. coherence tomography in diabetic
macular edema with systemic risk
4. International Diabetes Foundation. factors in middle aged males. Int
IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;35(1):3–10.
International Diabetes Foundation;
2017. 9. Jeng C-J, Hsieh Y-T, Yang C-M, Yang
C-H, Lin C-L, Wang I-J. Diabetic
5. An J. Insulin Use and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Diabetic
Macular Edema in Diabetes Mellitus: Nephropathy: Development and
A Systemic Review and Meta- Progression. Tzekov R, editor. PLOS
Analysis of Observational Studies. ONE. 2016 Aug 26;11(8).
Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:929–36.
10. Koo NK, Jin HC, Kim KS, Kim YC. primary care setting. Prim Care
Relationship between the Morphology Diabetes. 2017 Jun;11(3):288–96.
of Diabetic Macular Edema and Renal
Dysfunction in Diabetes. Korean J 15. Massin P, Paques M. Diabetic macular
Ophthalmol. 2013;27(2):98. edema. In: Levin LA, Albert DM,
editors. Ocular disease : mechanisms
11. Mathew C, Yunirakasiwi A, Sanjay S. and management. China: Elsevier;
Updates in the Management of 2010.
Diabetic Macular Edema. J Diabetes
Res. 2015;2015:1–8. 16. Sovani I, Kartasasmita AS, Iskandar E,
Virgana R. Hubungan faktor-faktor
12. Zhang X, Zeng H, Bao S, Wang N, resiko anemia, dislipidemia, regulasi
Gillies MC. Diabetic macular edema: gula darah, kadar ureum kreatinin dan
new concepts in patho-physiology and hipertensi dengan terjadinya edema
treatment. Cell Biosci. 2014;4(1):27. makula diabetik pada diabetes melitus
tipe 2. Pus Mata Nas RS Mata
13. Gardner TW, Quillen DA. Diabetic Cicendo.
macular edema. In: Spaeth GL, editor.
Ophtalmic surgery : principles and 17. Figueras-Roca M, Molins B, Sala-
practice. 4th ed. China: Elsevier; 2012. Puigdollers A, Matas J, Vinagre I,
Ríos J, et al. Peripheral blood
14. Martín-Merino E, Fortuny J, Rivero- metabolic and inflammatory factors as
Ferrer E, Lind M, Garcia-Rodriguez biomarkers to ocular findings in
LA. Risk factors for diabetic macular diabetic macular edema. Vavvas DG,
oedema in type 2 diabetes: A case- editor. PLOS ONE. 2017 Mar
control study in a United Kingdom 22;12(3):e0173865.

You might also like