Assignment 4

1. Analysis of Association, Bivariate, Null: There is no significant association between respondents eating vegetables
and respondents overall feeling about their health. Conclusion: There is significant association between respondents
eating vegetables and respondents overall feeling about their health.
Correlations
How many serves of In general would you say that your health
vegetables do you is excellent, very good, good, fair or
usually eat each day? poor? (self-reported health status)
How many serves of vegetables do you
Pearson Correlation 1 .192**
usually eat each day?
Sig. (2-tailed) <.001
N 305 305
In general would you say that your
health is excellent, very good, good,
Pearson Correlation .192** 1
fair or poor? (self-reported health
status)
Sig. (2-tailed) <.001
N 305 305
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
2. Predictive, Multiple Regression, Null: Consumption of fruits consumption of vegetables, and respondents monthly
income, are not significant predictors of how healthy people feel.
Conclusion 1: How many servings of vegetables people consume each day is a positive significant positive predictor
of how healthy people feel
Conclusion 2: How many servings of fruit respondents eat each day is not a significant predictor of how healthy
people feel.
Conclusion 3: Respondents monthly income is not a significant predictor of how healthy people feel.
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Model Unstandardized Coefficients t Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 3.097 .119 25.979 <.001
How many serves of vegetables do you
.099 .037 .165 2.680 .008
usually eat each day?
How many serves of fruit do you usually eat
.042 .038 .067 1.095 .274
each day?
In the last month, what was your total
7.874E-6 .000 .013 .225 .822
income?
a. Dependent Variable: In general would you say that your health is excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?
(self-reported health status)
3. Differential, One-Way ANOVA, Null: There is no significant difference within any possible pairs based on
respondent employment status and their monthly income. Conclusion: There is significant difference at least 1 pair of
all possible pairs regarding respondents employment status and their monthly income. I would tell her to get a full
time job because there is a difference regarding income between casual and full time.
In the last month, what was your total income?

Duncana,b
Are you currently in any form of paid employment? N Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
No 147 652.54
Yes - part time 49 1325.16
Yes - casual 102 1339.79
Yes - full time 7 3650.00
Sig. .097 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 22.238.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not
guaranteed.
4. Association, Cross Tabulation, Null: There is no significant association between whether respondents have a
regular source of income and if they smoke regularly. Conclusion: There is significant association between whether
respondents have a regular source of income and if they smoke regularly.

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 7.544 2 .023
Likelihood Ratio 8.440 2 .015
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.833 1 .009
N of Valid Cases 305

5. Difference, Independent Sample T Test, Null: There is no significant difference between people feeling
healthier and whether they have health insurance. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between
people feeling healthier and whether they have health insurance
P Value:.956

6. Analysis of Difference, Paired Sample T test, Null: The respondents are not good at balancing their fruits and
vegetables consumption. Conclusion: The respondents are good at balancing their fruits and vegetables
consumption.
P Value: <>.001
7. Descriptive, Frequency, Null: NA, Conclusion: 28 people. 27 years old – 42 years old
8. Differnece, Indpendent Samples T Test, Null: There is no signifigant differnece between respondents who have
been invloved as a car accident as a driver, and how much they spend on alcholoic beverages to entertian
themselves. Conclusion: There is no signifigant differnece between respondents who have been invloved as a car
accident as a driver, and how much they spend on alcholoic beverages to entertian themselves.
P value: .177