Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Macro framework
KHAN Academy
INSIGHTS
Outlining triggers for market performance excess return, depressed asset turn and tepid growth Ridham Desai
The list of known unknowns is a long one, given the macro outlook. Fiscal consolidation faces political challenges,
Sheela Rathi
set-up. To be sure, share prices can rise even in such an as do overall reforms, and meaningful change is not a
environment if expectations are low. From a market base-case outcome.
perspective, we highlight some fairly obvious triggers: Utkarsh Khandelwal
How does all this feed into the market outlook? M1
a) The market is acutely sensitive to global outcomes, in growth has put in a firm base, indicating stable revenue Amruta Pabalkar
fact, much more than to local outcomes, if return growth or even an acceleration. Improving liquidity has
correlations are an indication. This could partly explain the caused short-term rates to fall YoY. If the global risk
staleness of local bad news or the lack of forcefully positive appetite remains stable, rates will likely stay lower YoY.
news to dampen correlations. The prospects of a faster fall in the current account
b) Then again, there is strong fundamental reason for deficit relative to the fiscal deficit are good for profit
India’s high correlation with global markets. Global margins, albeit with an assumption that the investment
outcomes affect India’s macro stability, given the twin rate does not collapse. The outlook on profits may be
deficit, even as the market is more concerned with the better at the margin, but conviction is still low. The best
delta in the twin deficit rather than just the level. news on profits is that consensus expectations are low
c) There is a concurrent inflation impact (commodity and hence scope for upside surprise is rising.
prices) and, in turn, there are monetary policy implications.
India’s BoP, and thus interest rates, is also tied to global Sentiment remains fragile, if our proprietary sentiment
outcomes, and, eventually, growth feeds from it. indicator is a guide. Liquidity is better at the margin, as
d) Back home, the most crucial factors are the investment we noted, but still not firmly in favor of stocks. In the end,
Subscribe to India Strategy Research
rate and fiscal consolidation. The former could change if it is about what’s in the price. Arguably, valuations are
the public sector presses the throttle. The private sector attractive, notwithstanding the dispersion. Please see
will likely remain reluctant to invest, given the low level of chart on page 2 for a detailed pictorial representation.
Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research. As a result, investors should be aware that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of Morgan Stanley Research. Investors should consider Morgan Stanley Research
as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
For analyst certification and other important disclosures, refer to the Disclosure Section, located at the end of this report.
+= Analysts employed by non-U.S. affiliates are not registered with FINRA, may not be associated persons of the member and may not be subject to NASD/NYSE restrictions on communications with a subject
company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH
India Strategy
Sept. 10, 2012
Capital Flows
Global
Current Account Deficit: Government Policies
Oil, Gold
QE3 Fiscal Deficit
Inflation Mid Term Polls
Infrastructure and/or
Europe PSE capex
Private Sector Capex
Monetary Policy/Rates
China
Liquidity
Corporate Fundamentals What’s in the price
& Sentiment
Market Outlook
2
Source: Morgan Stanley Research
Foreign investment in India
AT THE start of 2012 India offered a cocktail that seemed guaranteed to be lethal for foreign investment: a
faltering economy, corruption and political gridlock. In March came the final flourish, the equivalent of the
barman spitting into your Death in the Afternoon. A budget was passed that aimed retroactively to tax
Vodafone, the country’s biggest foreign direct investor, and to clamp down on the holding structures used
by most foreign investors, in particular the routing of money through the low-tax paradise of Mauritius.
In April alone, foreigners sold almost $1 billion of portfolio investments in listed shares and debt. Such
outflows are scary. India runs a current-account deficit, which it aims to plug with portfolio inflows and
foreign direct investment. After a record deficit relative to GDP of 4.2% in the year to March 2012, the
deficit this fiscal year is expected to be 3-3.5% of GDP, or $50 billion-60 billion. To fund that kind of gap
safely, India needs the world to be bullish about it most of the time.
Some of this year’s inflows may reflect a statistical quirk surrounding the sale of a stake in an Indian bank
by Citigroup. But another possibility is buying by sovereign-wealth funds keen to diversify from America
and Europe, with their zombie economies and rock-bottom interest rates. Neelkanth Mishra of Credit
Suisse, a well-known bear on India’s immediate outlook, reckons investors with decades-long horizons are
still being drawn by India’s demography and rising middle class.
That might explain a paradox. The best-performing shares are not in sectors that would benefit from a
recovery, such as infrastructure and banks. Instead what have soared are the share prices of firms that seem
able to grow however bad the rest of the economy is. Consumer-goods firms such as Hindustan Unilever
and Nestlé’s Indian arm now trade on their most expensive multiple of profits since the late 1990s, when
the economy was last in the doldrums. The capital flows that India is attracting may say more about the
resilience of some of its firms than about the odds of a rapid bounce in its economy.
Credible India
by Sundeep Waslekar | Aug 27, 2012
Hope is the most important input for growth in any country. All hope asks for is focus to build a nation
that is humble, compassionate and above all else, a great one
Stone me for saying this. But say, I must. The great Indian obsession with wanting to be a great power is
utterly impractical, completely undesirable and totally nonsensical. What I would like India to be instead is
a great nation. I refuse to be a part of “Incredible India”. What I want is to be part of “Credible India”. This,
for two reasons:
Great powers destroy, great nations nurture. Destruction demands cruelty. Nurturing demands
compassion. I believe in compassion.
Great powers are built by rulers. Great nations are built by citizens who have as much a chance to take a
stab at greatness as their leaders. I believe in equality.
Both of my beliefs, as much as they are intensely personal, are rooted in history as well.
First, ask the most basic of all questions. Ought a nation to measure its success in terms of GDP growth or
in terms of the human development quotient?
I believe nations that measure success in terms of GDP are prone to violent disruptions. That, to my mind,
explains our susceptibility to terrorists. Norway, on the other hand, has a stated policy that policing will be
kept to the minimum. That explains why Scandinavian countries are of no interest to terrorists. When you
elicit no response, what is the incentive in attempting?
In making this transition, disruption is inevitable. But you could choose between managed positive
disruption, or enforced violent disruption.
To understand this, turn to Turkey once again. What happened there was that a group of politicians got
together and built new terms of reference for what a nation ought to be like. To do that, they hired a market
research agency to ask people what they want. Everything people said boiled down to two words—justice
and development. Armed with this insight, the Justice and Development Party was formed—the acronym
for which in Turkish is AKP—and is now in power.
Effectively, they used modern tools from mainstream business to understand grassroots problems and
arrive at a political conclusion. They presented their findings and agenda to the people and got elected into
office.
In Singapore, though, change was imposed. In the process, it compromised on civil liberties. However,
they’ve achieved 70-80 percent of what they set out to do.
Change in Malaysia was similar to what happened in Turkey. In 1968, following racial riots, leaders cutting
across communities came together and agreed they wouldn’t allow violence to happen again. So they made
a constitutional amendment that mandated any elected cabinet to have representatives of the three major
races in the country. They realised political engineering can be used to resolve other problems as well,
including economic ones.
I don’t see any signs of that happening in India. My beliefs compel me to argue that what India suffers
from is a crisis of vision, ethics and courage. Put these values together and what you have is statesmanship.
That is why even 60 years after his death, Mahatma Gandhi is still remembered. He had an ethical code,
and courage. Lee Kuan Yew, the first prime minister of Singapore, is someone I think of in that mould. He
once told me something interesting—that one of the driving forces in his life was a nursery rhyme.
He said he read it a few times every single day after he became prime minister. Because, he said, it
underscores an important political statement. If your national resources, whether human, natural, or
entrepreneurial, fail and go out, all the kings, their men and horses can’t put them together again. “So I had
to create a vested interest in the nation of Singapore, not by using power but by using ideas.”
He couldn’t have put it any better. Great nations are built on the back of ideas—not force.
Sundeep Waslekar is the president of Strategic Foresight Group, a think tank based in India that advises
governments and institutions around the world on managing future challenges.
He was instrumental in creating the concept of The Cost of Conflict in the Middle East, based on a complex
set of parameters, which has since then become the main tool for negotiations in the region. He also crafted
the concept of Blue Peace, which looks at how water can be used as an instrument of peace. Switzerland
has adopted this concept as part of its state policy, and the Swedish and British governments will soon
follow suit
ENAM Rural 2012
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Status of Monsoons: The South-West Monsoon (June-Sep) this time was delayed and very weak.
Important rain-fed agri regions in Maharashtra, Karnataka and Gujarat (oilseeds, cotton, sugar,
coarse grains) have been the worst affected, while important cereal-growing regions in the North
are relatively better off despite scanty rains. While of late the rain deficit has come down to 10%,
late sowing and weak rains will also bring down overall crop yields.
Inflation v/s Output pressures: While sowing acreage has shrunk, late rains will buffer some of
the low-yield effect and protect the winter crop. Govt also has record grain stocks, which however,
need to be deployed in time. Thus while we expect muted price pressure on cereals, prices for
vegetables, sugar cane, fruits, etc are likely to spike. Their impact would be felt towards November
when festive demand picks up post-harvest, and as stocks run down. Thus, we expect overall WPI
inflation to avg ~8% in FY13 (vs 7.5% earlier).
Rural Income: Rural income: Rural demand to weaken due to rising farm costs, poor monsoons,
and weakness in Services growth. Thus, private consumption (~57% of GDP) growth, that has
been the mainstay of India’s overall growth, is likely to remain erratic and below potential:
SEPTEMBER 2012 1
ENAM Rural 2012
Viability: Agriculture (> 50% of rural income) is becoming unprofitable for majority of farmers
who have small land holdings, as input costs have risen far more than incomes (MSPs).
Input Costs: NREGA impacting both availability and cost of labour. Increase in Fertiliser costs
(international prices and weaker INR) and Diesel costs (unit cost and greater requirement due
to poor rains).
Share of Wallet: Despite rising income (share of food should have fallen), high inflation has led
to a rise for rural India – for the first time in the last several years.
Non-agri Incomes: Slowdown in Govt/ pvt infra spend, leading to slowing Construction,
which accounts for a bulk of non-agri jobs.
SEPTEMBER 2012 2
ENAM Rural 2012
Banking:
Asset quality of agri loans, which account for 12% of total bank credit, likely to be under
pressure due to lower farm income levels (poor monsoon), expectations of debt waiver by
farmers, and an unofficial ‘go-slow’ by state administration on recovery of farm loans (as
general elections are due in 2014). Specifically, PSU banks are directed to disburse more “crop
loans” which have some subvention from the Govt – which is why pvt banks largely can’t
compete here. However, crop loans are the most vulnerable part of agri-lending to defaults.
Auto
Inventory levels high across segments, especially tractors and two wheelers
Demand slowdown visible, but will actually show up post harvest season (Nov/Dec).
Discounting, largely in petrol cars and M&HCVs. Expect discounting to start in other
segments post harvesting, if…
Demand decline in two wheelers/tractors least in Punjab/Gujarat which are well irrigated and
have alternate income sources.
In two wheelers, good response for Honda’s Dream Yuga.
In CVs, slowdown visible in M&HCVs and starting in small CVs (up to 3.5 tons).
SEPTEMBER 2012 3
ENAM Rural 2012
FMCG
Rural demand (~35% of FMCG market) weaker relative to last year. Discretionary income
squeezed by inflation in both farm inputs and consumption basket.
Down trading is visible in discretionary and non-discretionary categories.
Rising cost pressure for FMCG players in the 2nd half of FY13, could impact operating
margins.
Pricing power to weaken due to lackluster volume growth. Increase in pricing differential
between national brands and local brands leading to local brands gaining traction.
Farm inputs
High prices, weak rainfall hurting complex fertilizer demand: Sharp jump in DAP prices (2.5x
in last 12 months) and weak rainfall has led to a sharp decline in DAP usage by farmers.
Farmers have shifted from DAP to NPK fertilizers, which are cheaper than DAP.
Urea demand impacted but to a lower extent: Urea demand shrinkage is lower due to lower
prices and it being a necessity (P, K retention in soil for 24 months, versus N retention of a
single season).
Branded Fertilizers preferred by farmers: Farmers are ready to pay slight premium for
branded fertilizers as they have uniform size and texture, which farmers associate with better
quality.
Seed demand largely un impacted: Seed demand has largely been un impacted but there has
been down-trading in seed consumption as farmers reduced risk of losses due to lower yields.
Increased usage of spray Fertilizers: Due to high labor costs, farmers nowadays prefer
sprayable variety of fertilizers, which can be directly sprayed versus manual application.
Increased usage of weedicides: Farmers are using high proportion of weedicides as manual
labor for weed removal is costly.
High DAP & Urea usage in North India misleading: Farmers in Punjab and UP treat Urea &
DAP usage as a status symbol and hence use it regardless of need and affordability. This is
DESPITE extensive awareness programs by agricultural universities and state agriculture
department entities.
Labor costs, increasing seeds, DAP costs and higher usage of Diesel (for running pumps for
irrigation due to lack of rainfalls) are key concerns for farmers.
Government initiatives: The thrust would be in the worst hit states of Maharashtra and Karnataka
Cereal reserves with the govt are high and would be made available as required. Serious issues
would be in availability of water and fodder.
Diesel subsidy: 50% diesel subsidy to farmers in drought-affected areas, which will be equally
shared by the state and the centre.
Increased workdays under NREGA in notified sub-districts in Maharashtra increased to 150
from 100 recently.
Loan waiver of upto Rs 25,000 in Karnataka on loans from cooperative societies over the past
year.
Free cattle fodder centres in Maharashtra and Karnataka
SEPTEMBER 2012 4
ENAM Rural 2012
The South-West Monsoon (June-Sep) this time was delayed and weak. While of late the deficit has
come down to 10%, late sowing and weak rains will also bring down overall crop yields.
Rural demand v/s Monsoons: Rural income/ consumption is only PARTLY dependant on the
strength of monsoons. For eg monsoons were ~20% deficient in FY03 & FY 10, and dispersion was
equally poor and yet, agri GDP fell by 7% in FY 03 v/s rose 1% in FY 10.
Our 10 year study shows the correlation between various aspects of rural demand (eg agri-GDP,
auto sales, FMCG sales, etc) and the following factors, as shown in the table overleaf:
1. Monsoons: All 3 factors ie quantum, timing & geographical dispersion are important. The
water reservoir & table levels (which are partly determined by the PREVIOUS year’s
monsoons) also affect agri production; the winter crop thus partly depends on the water table
resulting from the monsoons. Thus, deficient monsoons for 2 years in a row is particularly
damaging, eg in 2002 & 03, and in Mah/ Karnataka this year
2. Crop vulnerability: The Govt’s existing food grain inventories obviously buffer the damage –
eg inventories are high this year
3. Rural income determinants: institutional credit to agriculture, rural policy measures (MSP,
NREGA, etc). One of the biggest drivers is overall GDP growth, as non-agri activities (i.e.
construction, trading and services, etc) now contribute ~50% of rural income.
FY03: Agri GDP contracted 7% while IIP-index (for consumer durables) and FMCG rural sales
experienced de-growth of 6% and 8% respectively. Note, there were no policy levers such as
NREGA etc to boost incomes and even MSP increase was inadequate.
FY10: Agri-GDP increased 1% YoY. The drought dealt a severe blow to production of paddy,
coarse cereals and oilseeds. Yet, Rural FMCG sales grew at a staggering 21% (highest in past 5
years) while tractor and 2-wheeler sales grew 32% and 26% respectively. The Monsoon impact
was negligible and this is mostly explained by other rural growth facilitators such as Farm
debt waiver, MSP increases, NREGA disbursement, Agri-credit growth, increase in food
procurement, etc.
SEPTEMBER 2012 5
ANALYSIS BEYOND CONSENSUS
…THE NEW ABC OF RESEARCH
Revised Schedule VI: Disclosures galore; benefits to accrue
• Current maturity of long-term debt (debt repayable within one year) will be
disclosed separately under ‘Other current liabilities’
The new format has been mandated for standalone financial statements and
consolidated financial statements, however, certain disclosures such as CIF value of
imports, foreign currency expenditure and earnings are required only at the standalone
level. The companies would be required to provide comparative fiscal years’ figure in
the new format. Accordingly, FY11 financial statements figures will be regrouped and Manoj Bahety, CFA
+91 22 6623 3362
stated as per the new format.
manoj.bahety@edelcap.com
Revised Schedule VI is not applicable to companies for whom the format for financial Sandeep Gupta
statements is already specified (like banking and insurance companies). Further, SEBI +91 22 4063 5474
sandeep.gupta@edelcap.com
has by recent amendment rolled out the format for reporting quarterly financials in line
with Revised Schedule VI. Ashish Gupta
+91 22 6623 3488
ashishs.gupta@edelcap.com
For live illustrations of changes in FY11 financials – Refer annexure
Analysis beyond Consensus (ABC) is our initiative to provide a differentiated perspective to our clients on
various non-routine and intricate issues. This unit of research works independent of the sector/stock May 8, 2012
research team and views expressed in this report may vary with that of respective sector/stock analyst.
Ambiguity on classification of acceptances Acceptances for raw materials should be Under the revised format also, Bad
disclosed along with trade payables acceptances/supplier's credit will form part of
operating activity, however, the cost of such
acceptances will continue to form part of finance
expenses
Loan funds of a company are separately disclosed Loan funds are split as short-term borrowings The amount for current portion of long-term debt Bad
on the face of balance sheet on half-yearly basis and long-term borrowings on half-yearly basis. embedded in Other current liabilities will only be
Further, long-term borrowings maturing within annually available
twelve months will be disclosed under ‘Other
current liabilities’
Under reconciliation of fixed assets, disclosure Reconciliation of fixed assets should apart from Analysts would be in a position to distinguish Good
mandated only for opening, additions, deletions earlier details also include assets acquired on between cash capex and other adjustments
and closing block acquisition, adjustments due to exchange
fluctuations under non-integral operations, etc.
Debit balance of P&L account was stated on the Debit balance of P&L account is to be disclosed as Reserves and surplus balance would present an Good
asset side of Balance sheet a reduction under the reserves and surplus accurate picture under the revised schedule VI
schedule
Only capital commitments need to be disclosed All commitments (capital, operating or otherwise) Investors will have complete information of all Good
needs to be disclosed long-term non-cancellable contracts entered into
by the company
Debtors outstanding exceeding six months from Debtors outstanding exceeding six months from Debtors exceeding due date of payment provides Bad
billing date need to be separately disclosed due date of payment need to be separately details about debtors which have turned sticky.
disclosed Accordingly, provision for these accounts will be
strongly encouraged
Details provided about installed capacity and No details to be provided Analysts would have to rely on communication Bad
actual production are disclosed from the companies in quarterly presentations
and details for details of actual production
Quantitative details with respect to opening No details to be provided No quantitative disclosure would prevent Bad
stock, purchases, consumption and closing stock analysts in certain industries such as cement,
are disclosed metals, FMCG not being able to use the required
information
Key Services :
The Institute of Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT), Hyderabad had been providing
ATM switching service to banks in India through National Financial Switch. This is now overseen by NPCI.
Currently majority of interbank mobile fund transfer transactions are channelized through NEFT mechanism.
Under NEFT, the transactions are processed and settled in batches, hence are not real time. Also, the transactions
can be done only during the working hours of the RTGS system.
IMPS offers an instant, 24X7, interbank electronic fund transfer service through mobile phones. IMPS facilitate
customers to use mobile instruments as a channel for accessing their bank accounts and put high interbank fund
transfers in a secured manner with immediate confirmation features.
Automated Clearing House system is known as Electronic Clearing Service (ECS) in India.
With the introduction of National Electronic Clearing Service (NECS) by RBI, a centralized service, the
reach of the system has further deepened and all the identified core banking branches of banks are
participating in the system irrespective of whether it is located at the listed ECS centres.
NPCI proposes to build, implement and manage an Automated Clearing House (ACH) system with
built-in security features and multiple level data validation facility accessible to all participants across
the country. The new centralized ACH solution is expected to consolidate the current multiple ECS
systems in due course of time and provide framework for removal of local barriers / inhibitors and
harmonization of standards and practices.
ACH platform will have national footprint which will cover 82000+ bank branches. The platform will be
robust, secure and scalable with both transaction and file based transaction processing capabilities. It
will have best in class security features, cost efficiency & payment performance (STP) for all
participants.
A centralised electronic benefit transfer system to undertake direct mandates from respective sponsor
or accredited bank attached to various government departments for the purpose of disbursing
entitlements using Aadhaar numbers. Features :
- Pre supposes that all Government beneficiaries would have Aadhaar linked account number
- Government Department can send file containing IIN, Aadhaar No and Amount
- APBS will receive the disbursal payment instruction from the Government Departments through
Sponsor Bank – (Banks has ability to convert in the required format)
- The bank identifier would be used to route transaction to the destination bank – the destination bank
will maintain the linkage to Aadhaar number and bank account for seamless credit to customer account
- Enriched MIS to participants
- Secure Clearing and Settlement
Almost 20cr new consumers into the system now….
( II ) Other Enablers
Itz-Cash
Investors :: Essel Group, Matrix Partners & Lightspeed Venture.
Has an extensive pan-India network spanning over 40,000 ItzCash franchisees. Additionally there
are approx 2,00,000 outlets in 2,000 Tier I and Tier II. It has more than 8 million unique active users
and processes more than 100,000 transactions worth Rs100 mn - Rs 150 mn worth transactions daily.
It is one of the largest payment gateway on IRCTC
Several others
Why Investing is the World’s Most Difficult Profession
Not because the financial markets are global and 24/7. Not because the markets are full of extremely driven
and intelligent competitors. Not because the emotional highs and lows can be soul crushing. It is because
of the constant and measurable competition against passive benchmarks.
Each day, month, quarter and year a professional investor’s performance is measured against both the
benchmark and their peers. Outside of professional sports, I’m not sure there is any other industry that
generates such objective and continuous measurements. And even in sports, there is no equivalent of a
“passive benchmark”. If a player is struggling, teams do not have the option to replace that player with a
benchmark that guarantees them the averaged production of every player at that position.
Benchmarks are the most ferocious of competitors. They show up for work everyday. They never get
sick. They don’t take vacation. They are always 100% invested so their results are continuously
compounding. Most importantly, they’re not aware of their own performance. The S&P 500 will never
enter the 4th quarter feeling it needs to really press to have good numbers for the year. Nor will it take
December off to “lock in” a good year.
Not only is the pressure unrelenting, but your failures are public on a scale that again only professional
athletes can relate to. If you do become a successful professional investor and overcome all of the above,
there is always the question of skill versus luck.
No fan in their right mind believes they have a chance of beating a Kobe Bryant or LeBron James at
basketball. Yet any investor can now buy a portfolio of index funds and have a good chance to outperform
not just a few, but the majority of mutual and hedge fund managers.
This inconvenient truth is like a little voice in the head of every successful investor – “Am I really good at
this or have I just been lucky?”. A voice that never goes away as it only takes a couple bad years to destroy
an lifelong track record
Solid Ground
Global outlook
40
30
20
10
0
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Feb
Find CLSA research on Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, CapIQ and themarkets.com - and profit from our evalu@tor proprietary database at clsa.com
Executive summary Solid Ground
Most money created since It’s generally held that in our fiat-money world, inflation is the most likely
2007 is not the product of outcome of unfettered money creation. However, in reality key global players
the fiat-money system
do not live in this world. Most emerging-market (EM) authorities allow the
quantity of money in their economies to adjust as necessary, while managing
their exchange rates relative to the US dollar. Two thirds of the growth in the
global money supply since 2007 was from these countries. A sudden
deterioration in their external accounts automatically produces a major
deceleration in money growth. Just such a slowdown is now underway.
EM inflation is rapidly The key driver of lower current- and capital-account surpluses in EMs is
reducing external inflation, which undermines their ability to attract and retain capital, and
surpluses and slowing
initiates the slowdown of domestic money creation and domestic growth.
money-supply growth
Undervaluing the exchange rate in nominal terms inevitably leads to inflation
and an exchange-rate revaluation in real terms. This is more insidious than a
nominal revaluation but also negatively affects competitiveness and returns
on capital. Indeed, it has a greater effect on returns, whereas the impact of a
nominal revaluation is heavily focused on the import and export sectors. With
prices rising across the economy, capital in all sectors struggles to secure
sufficient price rises to ensure that returns do not decline when a real
exchange-rate appreciation occurs. While it is possible for capital to maintain
returns in a high-inflation environment, the historical record suggests it is
likely to lose the battle.
Investors who believe capital can win need to reread Warren Buffett’s How
inflation swindles the equity investor (Fortune Vol. XCV No.5, May 1977;
reprinted in Classics: An Investor’s Anthology by The Institute of Chartered
Financial Analysts, 1989). Buffett seeks to explain why these equity claims on
real assets failed to provide the protection against inflation most analysts
expected. In particular, he notes that there was no statistical evidence to back
the proposition that corporate margins would expand in periods of inflation -
indeed, even by 1975 it was clear that margins were contracting as inflation
accelerated. The data from the Chinese listed sector show returns on capital
employed falling from 15.6% in 2007 to 10.5% today, and declines in returns
on capital are evident across EMs.
China’s capital-account This dynamic will deplete China’s capital-account surplus - a key part of its
surplus has accounted external surplus which has driven money creation. From 2007-11, China’s
for about half its
capital-account surplus accounted for around half of its total surplus. The
total surplus
mainland’s move to a capital-account deficit in 2012 and its declining foreign-
exchange reserves show that the mechanism is now in reverse. While many
In the developed world, This slowdown would come while developed-world central banks are still
central banks still struggling to create robust, sustainable growth in broad money. A fiat-money
struggle to create money
system is not one where the authorities grow money by printing it. Instead
they seek to produce expansion in the fractional reserve banking system’s
balance sheets, resulting in the creation of bank deposits. Thus under the
standard mechanism, the creation of fiat money depends primarily upon
supply and demand for bank credit and/or the willingness of banks to expand
their balance sheets through the purchase of other assets - ie, government
debt. If the authorities work only to create money through the banking
system, they will fail if the supply/demand for credit does not result in the
expansion of bank balance sheets and creation of deposits.
QE produced moderate In the USA and UK, the breakdown in the supply/demand equation for bank
growth in broad money in credit was spotted early and the authorities began to bypass the banks by
the USA, but not in the UK
buying assets from the private nonbanking system. This created new money
for the sellers of these assets and helped prevent a contraction in fiat money
while bank balance sheets shrank. The experiment shows that fiat money can
be created even when the normal channels are broken. However, the central
banks must work harder, as new regulations - as well as the condition of their
balance sheets - are pushing commercial-banks towards reducing rather than
expanding credit. In the UK, even the creation of money outside the banking
system via QE failed: broad money has declined by £324bn (9%) since early
2010. The USA’s QE has been more productive. US M3 (as reconstituted by
CLSA) has expanded by US$1,229bn (12%) from its April 2010 low but is still
just 7% above its 2009 peak, whereas the UK’s M4 is 7% below its 2011
peak. If this monetary experiment is to be the cauldron of inflation, it has yet
to produce the head of steam for higher prices.
European bank loans to In Europe broad money is growing at around 3.5% pa, but this looks set to
the private sector are fall as lending to the private sector is contracting. Only strong growth in bank
contracting and the risk
credit to European governments is preventing a decline in broad money. The
of a euro exit is rising
Eurozone thus finds itself in a precarious situation: the last time bank loans to
the private sector contracted, a reduction in broad money and a recession
ensued. Draghi may be able to move forward with a form of QE, but it is
unlikely to boost broad-money growth in the near term. US broad money
declined for a year post QE1, and UK broad money is still contracting despite
particularly aggressive QE. The ECB will have an even harder struggle if any
Eurozone member fails to take the next step to fiscal federalism and has to
leave the euro. In this situation Europe could face a major monetary disaster.
Whatever the region’s monetary future may be, the least likely outcome is
acceleration in broad-money growth.
China’s banks do create Most of the world’s money-supply growth now springs from China, which may
money, but in the process undermine some of the inflationary implications of such growth. The PBOC is
they also finance the
unlikely to resort to creating money outside the banking system while it
production of capacity
Avoiding 1997-98, 2000- Deflation is very unlikely in a fiat system. However, the world does not
03 and 2007-09 deflation operate on such a system. The EM money supply is anchored on exchange-
shocks was key . . .
rate targeting, not money-supply targeting. This restricts monetary freedom
at a time when the developed world is struggling to increase the supply of fiat
money due to the banking crisis. Crucially, in China the ability to create
money is predicated on the command-economy banking system’s ability to
continue funding ever higher levels of investment and production. This
combination of factors is now aligned to make a deflationary adjustment more
likely than an inflationary adjustment. While the grossly over-indebted
nations will eventually have to inflate their way into the future, the path to
that inflation is not straight. Deflation delivered three damaging losses of
capital to investors in 1997-98, 2000-03 and 2007-09. Investors who opted
. . . and now it’s time to for liquidity during these episodes generated material real returns in equities
avoid the next one over 1997-2012 and produced at least top-decile performance relative to the
competition. Avoiding the next deflationary episode is now key not just to
profiting but perhaps even surviving as a professional investor.
Introduction
The looming twin challenges of climate change and energy production are too big to be tac
kled by known solutions and time honoured traditions. Incremental
remedies are fine for incremental problems, but they are insufficient for monumental, potentially
life--‐altering threats, which need to be approached with a disruptive mind-set.
There are 5 billion people coveting the energy--‐rich lifestyles currently enjoyed by
500 million people, mostly in the developed world. Incremental technology progress
will not satisfy this craving. We need non--‐linear jumps in technologies. Technological Black
Swans! We can invent these future technologies.
Environmentalists have done a superb job identifying the problem, but often push impractical id
ealistic solutions at high cost or inconvenience to consumers. I believe that capitalism and selfi
nterest driven models of new technology adoption are the lowest risk way to achieve a low carb
on social infrastructure and plentiful energy. The solution cannot be pushed by legislation or go
vernments; it must be pulled into the market by consumers, corporations and aided by en
couraging policy. The environmentalist solution is often one of “deploy the technologies we have
as quickly as possible” combined with idealized hopes that the business community will start t
o value un--‐priced environmental and health externalities.
These thoughts are noble, and occasionally work, but distract from our best “broad” hope:
robust unsubsidized market competitiveness of “green” technologies against their fossil competit
ors. This should be the mantra and goal of Black Swan technology development. After all, the
logic of business is to externalize as many costs (like using public roads or not reducing
emissions) and maximize profits, as it should be. “Green” should be a feature that follows –
rather than defies the “laws of economic gravity,” which in essence declares that economics tr
ump everything when it comes to mass adoption of a technology. In fact, the mindset of clea
n energy always costing more can be turned completely on its head in many, even most,
areas economic energy focused innovations could save consumers hundreds of billions.
My basic thesis is that investment in true innovation is the key to reinventing the infrastructure
of society and enabling 5+ billion people to sustainably live the energy affluent lifestyle that 500
million. While there is no shortage of existing technology providing incremental improvements –
whether today’s thin film solar cells, wind turbines, or lithium-ion batteries even summed, they
are not likely to address the scale of our problems. While these technologies will continue to
improve and sometimes this incremental ecosystem will result in products compliant with the laws
of economic gravity, such as wind in certain locations or lithium-ion batteries
in certain applications, I suspect this will not be enough. Regulation and clever
accounting will help many pundits justify and push these technologies, but in order to drive
the necessary resource multiplication, we need to (and can) reinvent the infrastructure of society
through the creation of Black Swan energy technologies.
These Black Swans are technologies that are market competitive without subsidies once scaled, a
and hit the CHINDIA price point (the price at which people in India and China will willingly purc
hase without subsidy) while providing sufficient scale to have measureable impact. They may
have up to a 90% chance of failure, but if they succeed, everything changes. Ironically, many
appear to have a high probability of failure mostly because they have not been given sufficient
scientific focus. Because of this, the sceptical questions such as “wasn’t this tried before ?”
or “why now?” keep many people from even trying.
Consider this: most projections of future oil use are based on linear extrapolations of the pa
st.However, the reality is quite different: for instance, as personal income (PPP GDP per capita
in 2010 dollars) in South Korea went from $10,000 per person to $20,000, over 10 years, per c
apita oil use quickly jumped from a mere 0.014 barrels per day per person to nearly 0.05,an in
crease of 3.5 times.Now consider that in 2009, China was at ~$12,500 PPP GDP per capita and
growing by at least 10 percent. If China continues to grow at 10 percent, they’ll reach the $
20,000 threshold in 5 years and $30,000 by 2020. In order for China’s oil
consumption to track South Korea, or Taiwan, the world oil output would need to dou
ble, and China would go from 10 percent of demand to nearly half.
In reality, we won’t run out of oil overnight. We can produce a lot more oil than many
pundits believe; if prices go up, oil sands, oil shale, coal-to-liquid and a handful of other
processes will scale up oil reserves are more of an economic concept than a geological one. H
owever, most of these technologies are far more costly and damaging to the ecosystem than
traditional oil extraction and have increasing costs as we try and access more of these resources.
The only way to create 5 billion energy-rich lifestyles economically without complete
environmental destruction and geopolitical conflict is through resource multipliers: technology
or techniques that dramatically increase our ability to create and use energy efficiently. More
specifically, the technology will have to achieve 5 to 10 times our current energy productivity (
GDP output per BTU consumed or 80 to 90 percent improvement in efficiency overall) over the
next few decades while dropping carbon emissions per unit energy by a similar factor, by
increasing supplies of economic low carbon energy (BTU per carbon emissions). In simple ter
ms, we need more light per unit of electricity and lower carbon per unit of electricity, more
engine horsepower per gallon of fuel and lower carbon fuel, etc. (I have written about how bes
t to structure a global carbon framework previously in my paper “Whose Rules?” and a
recent foreign policy article.)
Focusing on shortterm incremental solutions as the answer risks distracting us from working on
the home runs that could change assumptions. This is the real danger because only when we bre
ak down current assumptions can we begin to confidently look for those game changers
. Incremental improvements have their place as part of a complex ecosystem of innovation,
but mostly as catalysts to larger innovations that end up changing assumption.
Therefore, I personally believe we overvalue incremental steps at the expense of Black Swan
innovations that have a better shot at economically addressing problems at scale. As an
example, wind power makes economic sense in certain applications but will remain a niche
solution until energy storage takes a quantum leap. A Black Swan in storage would change
the outcome for wind (and solar) more than any innovation in wind, which is why I think
that subsidy dollars are better spent encouraging storage innovation than wind adoption.
Solar, given the current trajectory and rate of technology innovation, may get substantially more
economic through technology change into the adjacent possible. While the adjacent possible in
wind is generally incremental, in solar, if one defines the adjacent possible to include structures
and materials different than traditional solar cells, then large improvements are possible. Though
often a matter of definition and semantics, “incremental” upgrades and tweaks to most current
technology merely reinforce the erroneous generalized belief that “everything” has already
been “ figured out,” and tomorrow’s solution is simply today’s technology with a few tweaks.
That said, uneconomic solutions simply will not succeed at scale. The only scalable solutions
are economic ones that hit the “CHINDIA” price point. After all, a rural Indian farmer
won’t buy a more efficient widget because it emits less carbon; he’ll buy it because it save
s him money, or enables him to do something he couldn’t do previously. Remember that
this farmer doesn’t have access to cheap credit, which many environmental or academic “eco
nomic” calculations assume to be a 3 to 5 percent interest rate, but rather he borrows at
the rate of the local moneylender.
Any new technology must have a path to unsubsidized market competitiveness if it’s going to h
ave a chance to scale. To have any hope of rapid adoption, this new technology must pay for
itself in a year or two for individuals or have at least an 18 to 20 percent IRR for corporate i
nvestments. This is the reality of consumer and corporate behaviour against all the arguments
of what consumers or corporations “should” do.
Nuclear is a classic example of an incumbent technology that claims to be cheap, but this
illusion swiftly breaks down without government loan guarantees (capital cost subsidies), waste
disposal subsidies, subsidized insurance and the like. If solar, wind, storage and other technologi
es were on a level playing field and got similar loan guarantees and similar subsidies
i would welcome the competition. The fact is that the nuclear industry received tens of billions
in cumulative subsides when it was nascent to get down the cost and technology curve, and still
continues to do so. Much of the miracle of France’s nuclear power could not be replicated today at
the 12-15% return rates commercial investors want. Nuclear power in those “level playing field
“conditions would not be the cheapest alternative, though I am a fan of letting nuclear power
compete with renewables.
Wind and solar for their part need to recognize that we cannot supply power only when the wi
nd is blowing or the sun is shining, but when the consumers want it! Averaging renewable re
sources over large areas doesn’t get there since it works only in an idealized situation with e
nough sources, but not along the path of development, and power needs to be delivered al
most 100 percent of the time it is demanded. We need to be pragmatic on all sides; reliable pe
ak power matters. It is difficult to have policy biased towards innovation, or “innovation capita
lism,” but it will help assuming it can get past the existing influencers. Havinggood policy inpla
ce will help, but again, in my view, it is not necessary to drive Black Swan innovations in the
US.
Energy is an even bigger challenge and opportunity than information and telecommunications.
Market forces will drive reinvention of the infrastructure of society. If we harness and motiv
ate these bright new minds with the right market signals, a whole new set of future assumpti
ons, unimaginable today, will be tomorrow’s conventional wisdom. I predict there will be 10
or more Googles in the energy space in the next two decades.
What if oil was renewable and cheaper than fossil crude oil and we used 50--‐65% less of it?
1. KiOR (www.kior.com):
KiOR is a renewable fuels producer taking wood chips, whole logs, agriculture
and other lignocellulose material and converting it directly into a crude oil or gasoline
and diesel blendstock that can be “dropped in” to the existing refinery or distribution
infrastructure without significant modification. The company combines a proprietary catalyst
system with an oil industry process called FCC (a proven industry for 60 years). In essence,
KiOR’s technology simply reduces nature’s process of creating oil from biomass by removing
oxygen that usually takes millions of years to a matter of seconds .Aiming $60/ 80 per bbl costs.
2. Ecomotors (www.ecomotors.com):
Ecomotors is a company reinventing the internal combustion engine, which is one of the
relatively inefficient, yet most used devices in the world today. Can yield up to 50 percent more
efficient powertrains in dual module configurations at costs substantially lower than hybrid drive
trains. The advantages of the OPOC design are in its relative simplicity (fewer parts), low cost,
lighter weight, and higher power density.
What if coal based electricity could be 75% cleaner and we used 75% less of it for lighting and c
ooling?
3. Ciris (www.cirisenergy.com):
The world depends on coal for a substantial portion of its energy supply. While replacing coal
is a legitimate long term goal, what if we could clean up coal without enormous costs associated
with unproven IGCC? Ciris Energy is working on turning underground seams of coal into
natural gas producing wells (30% reduction in emissions) without the financial costs and
environmental degradation of traditional coal mining and burning. Ciris aims to render old--‐
fashioned coal mining obsolete.
4. Calera (www.calera.com):
5. Terrapower (www.terrapower.com):
Terra Power’s traveling wave reactor (TWR) will offer a path to zero--‐emission, proliferation--‐
resistant energy that produces significantly smaller amounts
of nuclear waste than conventional nuclear reactors. After an initial start--‐
up with a small amount of low--‐
enriched material, this innovative reactor design can run for decades on depleted uranium –
currently a waste by
product of the enrichment process (or even spent fuel from other reactors). An
established fleet of TWRs could operate without enrichment or reprocessing for millennia.
6. Soraa (www.soraa.com):
Soraa is developing high quality LED lighting at low cost they expect to be able to sell an LED
bulb with 80% less energy consumption than standard incandescent lamps with the same light
output and with a 12 month payback. These lamps can be designed for any form factor able t
o fit standard residential and business light fixtures while offering significant energy savings
7. Caitin (www.caitin.com):
HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) systems the world over generally use the
same approaches.
These existing cycles have been pushed to their limits in terms of performance and efficiency
gains with little innovation to be had. Caitin is in the early stages of exploring a completely
different approach --‐ compressor-
less cooling that exploits a whole new thermodynamic cycle (the first practical new thermodyna
mic cycle in over 50 years). If the system works as envisioned, they aim to provide very
efficient cooling (coefficient of performance of 6-10 ) , 2x better than
state of the art compressors with an extremely short payback period and independent of local c
onditions like humidity.
What if electricity storage was affordable for both stationary and mobile applications and we
had a truly smart grid, well beyond today’s “smart meters” that are little more than automa
ted meter reading?
8. Lightsail (www.lightsailenergy.com):
To be truly “dispatchable” and available to match demand, power generation needs the ability to
have efficient and cheap energy storage. Lightsail is exploring highly efficient and cost effective
compressed air energy storage (CAES) technology with return trip storage efficiencies upwards
of 75 percent. They believe they can get to power costs of less than $500 per KW and energy
costs of below $100 per kWh, without the need for underground caverns (geographically constrain
ed), without needing to use natural gas for power regeneration as is current practice, and without
the large energy losses and huge footprints that experts assume for CAES.
Multiple other technologies are interesting as well, including Gen IV solar cells, small modula
r nuclear reactors, methane hydrates mining, high voltage DC transmission, electrochromic wind
ows, new construction materials, thermoelectrics, bioplastics, waste utilization, solid oxide fuel
cells, or other high efficiency distributed power generation and hundreds of other technologies t
hat I consider important though not all are Black Swan “shots on goal.” And there are technolog
ies we desperately need like a Black Swan for water desalination.
CANVAS OF MY WORLD
One day, the two brothers, Ganesha and Kartikeya, decided to race three
times around the world. Kartikeya, being more athletic, jumped on his
peacock and flew around the oceans, the continents and the stars. The
elephant-headed Ganesha simply went around his parents, twirling
around himself, and declared himself the winner. When asked for an
explanation, Ganesha said, “I went around my world. You went around
the world. What matters more?”
Greeks believed you live only once. And the one who does something extraordinary in this life , earns
oneself a place in Elysium, the heaven of heroes. In the Greek world, the gods of Olympus were capricious;
they sought to keep humans in check lest they rise up in revolt. They feared being overthrown by humans
just as they had overthrown the Titans and the Titans had overthrown the Giants before them. Heroes were
men who did extraordinary things despite the odds thrown in their direction by the Fates controlled by the
gods. Epics spoke of fathers who tried to kill their newborn sons who were prophesized to kill them, and of
sons who rose up against father and god and authority, fought the monsters created by them, and after
many an adventure, achieved the impossible to become heroes, worthy of adoration. Glory lay in defiance
of authority and transgression of rules. This is the recurrent theme in the stories of Hercules, Theseus, Jason
or Achilles.
The Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) also speak of one life, followed by an afterlife. But the
world imagined by them is very different from the one of the Greeks. The Biblical world referred to a kind
and loving God who cared for his creation and whose children kept breaking the rules he asked them to
follow. So we have the story of the transgression of Adam and Eve, and of various prophets like Moses and
kings like David, who struggle to uphold the commandments of God, and make others follow them in
faith. Glory here lay in obedience and compliance; it gets you not to Elysium of the heroes but to what the
Koran refers to as Jannat for the faithful.
Who is right? Should life be about defiance or compliance, about breaking rules or following rules? If the
question was posed to a Rishi from India, he would ask: why should the answer be this or that, why can the
answer not be this and that. He would say both are okay depending on the context. So Hindu mythology
has Krishna who breaks rules and Ram who follows rules. Krishna belongs to Dvapara yuga and Ram
belongs to Treta yuga. But are not Krishna and Ram two different characters? Not at all, said the Rishi; they
were two lifetimes of Vishnu, who is God.
The Rishi believed in rebirth. He believed we do not live just one life; we live infinite lives, one life after
another, again and again. Death is not a full stop; it is a comma. And so you have the option of living one
life in defiance and one life in compliance depending on whether the father, or authority, or deity, of that
life is cruel (like Olympian gods) or caring (like God of Abraham). This view is shared by most religions of
Indian origin, including Jainism and Buddhism.
Refusal to acknowledge these imagined realities, these ‘my’ worlds, is the root cause of cultural intolerance,
human insensitivity and the clash of civilizations. It happened once nearly 2300 years ago on the banks of
the river Indus. Alexander, the Great, after conquering Persia found there, what he called a gymnosophist,
or a naked wise man. He was perhaps a Jain muni or perhaps a yogi, who sat on a rock and meditated all
day and gazed at the stars all night. “What are you doing?” asked Alexander. “Experiencing nothingness,”
answered the gymnosophist. Then the gymnosophist asked, “What are you doing?” Alexander replied, “I
am conquering the world.” Both chuckled and parted ways, each one thinking the other was a fool.
Significantly, science in its quest for the objective truth aligns itself with one-life subjective truths. But
which one? Greek or Abrahamic? Alexander’s subjective truth works for those who want to conquer the
world. But there are many who are not interested.
www.khanacademy.org
The Khan Academy is an organization on a mission. We're a not-for-profit with the goal of changing education for the
better by providing a free world-class education for anyone anywhere.
All of the site's resources are available to anyone. It doesn't matter if you are a student, teacher, home-schooler,
principal, adult returning to the classroom after 20 years, or a friendly alien just trying to get a leg up in earthly
biology. The Khan Academy's materials and resources are available to you completely free of charge.
"I teach the way that I wish I was taught. The lectures are coming from me, an actual human being who is fascinated by the world
around him."
—Sal
Students can make use of our extensive video library, interactive challenges, and assessments from any computer
with access to the web.
Coaches, parents, and teachers have unprecedented visibility into what their students are learning and doing on the
Khan Academy.
Practice math at your own pace with our adaptive assessment environment. You can start at 1+1 and work your way
into calculus or jump right into whatever topic needs some brushing up.
Each problem is randomly generated, so you never run out of practice material. If you need a hint, every single
problem can be broken down, step-by-step, with one click. If you need more help, you can always watch a related
video.
Your stats, instantly
A map of knowledge
The knowledge map shows all of our challenges, skills, and concepts. You can zoom in and out and pan around all
the different skills and challenges, just like on a normal map. You can start working anywhere on the map, and the
Khan Academy will suggest the best skills for you to work on. We'll even remind you when you need a review.
As you zoom out of the knowledge map, you'll find our challenges, which combine the concepts from multiple
smaller skills. Zooming all the way out of the map and completing all of our challenges is a sign of math mastery.
Teachers and coaches can access all of their students' data. You can
get a summary of class performance as a whole or dive into a
particular student's profile to figure out exactly which topics are
problematic. The class profile lets coaches glance at their dashboard
and quickly figure out how to best spend their time teaching.
We've put a lot of energy into making sure that the Khan Academy
empowers teachers by giving them access to the data they should've
had for years. You'll know instantly if a student is struggling in
multiplying fractions...or if she hit a streak and is now far ahead of
the class.