Balanced approach:

Paragraph 1:

Central Idea – how/on what areas it would be more beneficial to spend

funds on:

Reason 1: More important fields for society (education, healthcare)

Reason 2: It does not affect/benefit everyone

Paragraph 2: Why spending money on art is necessary:

Reason 1: It helps to develop cultural/social/intellectual level of society

Reason 2: It can bring some indirect benefits to a nation (attracting

tourists, making the country known on international arena)

Reason 3: To preserve national identity

1) Is my idea/argument relatable and related to the topic?

2) Is my (new) not repetitive?
3) Is my idea extendable?
Nowadays, it is believed that bettering the community is more
important than focusing on oneself.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

One-sided approach

Body part 1: (One central idea)

Argument 1 – Explanation (In other other words) – Reason – (Result) –

Example (More can be achieved)

Argument 2 – Explanation – Reason – Result – (Example) (Today`s

global problems require cooperation and not individuality)

Argument 3 – Explanation – (Reason) – Result – Example – (Conclusive

Idea) (Better resulting quality of life - Better conditions for future
generation)

Paragraph 2: Concession paragraph

Admittedly, it is true that community consists of individuals and it might

be argued that by bettering oneself, society can also grow considerably.
However, it is equally true that not everyone in the community may
have capacity or resources or desire to improve themselves and might
need outside help.