Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Introduction
- The economic foundations
- Legal, economic and political challenges for the WTO
1. Introduction :
Three major developments were required before a multilateral trading order could be created,
including the emergence of two ideas and the resolution of a paradox. The first idea is that countries
are sovereign, and hence have control of their own destinies, but also that the best exercise of
sovereignty is to enter into binding agreements with other states by which they place voluntary and
mutual limits on their exercise of that sovereignty. The second idea was the notion that countries
extract mutual gains from freer trade. The third development concerned power its paradox.
The expanding scope of negotiations creates greater friction between WTO members who hold
differing views about the role of the state, whether in the domestic or international form.
Economists have debated the merits of discriminatory arrangements since the mid-twentieth
century, but they have come to no consensus on whether, on the whole, these arrangements can
best be seen as building blocks or stumbling blocks for the multilateral trading system.
The only point on which there is absolute agreement is that discrimination proliferated far more
rapidly in the WTO period than it did in the GATT period, with agreements expanding both in
number and in significance.
If the multilateral trading system had to be reduced to a single sentence. It might be this it receives
its inspiration from economists and is shaped primarily by lawyers, but it must operate within the
limits that the politicians set.
Scholars and practitioners who adopt a political view of the system differ from the disciplines
reviewed above not so much in what they examine as in how they choose to see it. Where legal
theorists and lawyers look for principles, and economists and business people see interests, political
scientist and statesmen focus on power.