Many musicians and performers make a distinction between "good nervousnes s"

and "bad nervousness". What do you think this distinction means? How does it
apply to public speaking?Many musicians and performers make a distinction
between "good nervousnes s" and "bad nervousness". What do you think this
distinction means? How does it apply to public speaking?

The distinction between "good nervousness" and "bad nervousness" is a common concept in the
world of performing arts, including music and acting. It refers to how individuals perceive and
react to the anxiety or nervousness they experience before a performance.

Good Nervousness:

"Good nervousness" is often associated with a sense of excitement and anticipation. It can be seen
as a positive force that sharpens focus, increases energy levels, and enhances performance.
Musicians and performers who experience good nervousness may feel a heightened sense of
alertness and enthusiasm, which can positively impact their creativity and stage presence. It is
often the result of being well-prepared and motivated to deliver an outstanding performance.

Bad Nervousness:

"Bad nervousness," on the other hand, is characterized by excessive anxiety, fear, or dread. It can
hinder performance by causing physical symptoms like trembling, sweating, or a racing heart, as
well as mental symptoms like blanking out or losing concentration. Musicians and performers
experiencing bad nervousness may find it detrimental to their overall performance quality. It often
stems from a lack of preparation, self-doubt, or negative self-talk.

The distinction between good and bad nervousness is highly applicable to public speaking as
well. When it comes to giving speeches or presentations, individuals often experience varying
degrees of nervousness.

In the Context of Public Speaking:

"Good nervousness" in public speaking can be seen as the excitement and anticipation that come
from feeling well-prepared and motivated to deliver an impactful presentation. This positive
energy can enhance one's speaking style and engagement with the audience.
"Bad nervousness" in public speaking refers to excessive anxiety, fear, or self-doubt that can
undermine the quality of the presentation. It may manifest as stage fright, leading to physical
symptoms that hinder effective communication.

To apply this distinction effectively to public speaking, speakers should strive to transform their
anxiety into "good nervousness" by being well-prepared, focusing on the message they want to
convey, and viewing the audience as receptive and interested. Techniques like positive
visualization, controlled breathing, and mental reframing can help shift anxiety toward a more
positive and productive state.

Ultimately, the goal in both performing arts and public speaking is to harness nervousness as a
source of energy and enthusiasm rather than allowing it to undermine performance. By
recognizing and managing these different forms of nervousness, individuals can become more
effective and confident speakers or performers.

What information from the video and lecture notes do you think will help you w

ith the preparation of your upcoming speech?

I have learned a lot from watching the video and reading the lecture notes, and they will be really
helpful as I get ready to give a speech soon. Understanding the fear linked to public speaking is
among the key lessons to be learned. According to the lecture notes, there are four typical causes
of this anxiety: the fear of being gazed at, the fear of failing, the fear of being rejected, and the
fear of the unknown. I now have a greater grasp of the psychological causes of public speaking
anxiety, which will help me address and control my worries while I work on my speech.

The concept of "positive nervousness," which is mentioned in the materials, is intriguing. By

changing the way that anxiety is typically seen as a problem, It serves as a source of vigor and
energy. This change in viewpoint is consistent with the idea that, by sharpening thinking and
boosting enthusiasm, a certain amount of fear might improve performance. I intend to keep this
idea in mind while I get ready for my speech so that I may use my anxiety to make a more
dynamic and interesting presentation.

The lecture notes also provide helpful advice for speech preparation's planning phase. These
techniques include picking a subject that interests you personally, avoiding the memory trap,
focusing on your audience instead of yourself, and spending additional time creating a strong
introduction. These recommendations will act as a road map for my preparation, giving me a
strong base from which I may build my speech.

An important element of a speech is its fundamental idea. It functions as the main idea that
should drive the entire speech and is comparable to a thesis statement. As I concentrate on
organizing my presentation, I will find it quite helpful to comprehend the significance of a
primary idea and its function in influencing the speech's substance. This will guarantee that my
speech remains coherent and clear and that it effectively connects with my audience.

Last but not least, even though it isn't mentioned in the lecture notes, the understanding that some
tactics might not work for online presentations serves as a reminder to stay flexible. I realize that
whether I'm delivering a speech in person or electronically, I need to adjust my strategy to the
particular circumstances surrounding my future speech. This adaptability will be an essential
component of my preparation.

In conclusion, the video and lecture notes' insights provide a thorough road map for productive
speech preparation. I feel prepared to give a successful and memorable speech after studying the
psychology of public speaking fear, embracing positive nervousness, putting into practice useful
planning techniques, realizing the value of a key point, and customizing my style for online
presentations.