22 Accelerated Dragons 12 Wel a6 13 Dc3 Abd5 14 AxdS = Minev-Keres, Munich OL 1958. 12...Dc6 Also reasonable is 12...a6 13 ®c3 (13 Wb3 axb5 14 Wxb4 bxc4 15 Wxc4 €5 16 Db3 Leb 17 WbS 2d7 18 Wd3 06 19 Hid] Ad5 20 Kc5 He8 21 £3 4 22 fxe4 D4 tured out well for Black in Binder-Felegyhazi, Debrecen 1995) and here: 1) 13...c5 14 Df3 RFS 15 Rc5 Bd8 16 Wb3 scems to give White some ad- vantage: 16...a5 (16...Ad3 17 Re7 Hc8 18 Rxf6 Dc5 19 Rxg7! Axb3 20 S&xe5 Wa7 21 axb3 Bd8 22 Dd5 is bad for Black, Litvinov-Mukhin, USSR 1962) 17 Had1! &c2 18 Bxd8+ Wxd8 19 Wa3 Ac6 20 Hel £5 21 Hdl Ad7 22 2e3 + Radulov-Dede, Vr¥ac 1971. 1b) 13...Wc7 14 Wb3 (14 Bcl!?) 14...0c6 15 Axc6 bxc6 (Black has equalized) 16 Wa3 He8 17 &c5 Hb8 18 R£3 Re6 19 Wxa6? Ad7! 20 a3 De5 21 Re4 Ha8 22 Abs Wad7 23 W6 Hab8 24 &xc6 Axc6 and Black went on to win in Gounder-Balaskas, Caorle 1975. 13 Axe6 Quiet moves such as 13 h3 allow Black to develop easily with 13...2d7. Also lame is 13 Wb3 @xd4 14 &xd4 a6 15 Bc3 gd! F (analysis by An- dres). 13...bxc6 14 Dd4 Estevez-Andres, Cuban Ch 1984/5, and now instead of 14...Wxb2?! 15 %xc6 &e6 which allows 16 Dxe7+! @h8 17 Rd4 Wo7 18 DdS! Dxd5 19 Rxg7+ Sxg7 20 2 £3! Bad8 21 Wd4+ g8 22 Midi Hd6 23 cxd5 Mids 24 Wh4! Sxd5 25 Rxd5 Hxd5 26 Wrxd8+!, Black should play 14...Wc7! with equality according to Estevez. Is this assessment true? 14...Sd7 was played in Yanofsky-Benko, Stock- holm IZ 1962. After 15 2£3 Wc7 (this position could also have occurred via 14...Wic7 15 &£3 2d7) 16 Db3 BFds 17 Dc5 RFS 18 We2 e5 19 g4 Rd7 20 Had1 h6 21 b4 Re8 22 bS Exdi 23 Bxd1 Hc8 24 a4 White enjoyed a clear advantage. B3b) 9...@xd5 (D) xu aa wae x" NX . TY BH : AO OREBAD BR 7w72e 10 Dxd5 10 Dxc6 bxc6 11 Rd4 (better is 11 @xd5 cxd5 12 R£3 e6 13 2.d4 Rab 14