You are on page 1of 118

MULTISTATE FLASH CARDS

CIVIL PROCEDURE
Reed Law Group, Ltd/aka Reed Bar Review
360 W. Illinois Street, Suite 509
Chicago, Illinois 60654
1.800.852.3926

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
Copyright by Reed Law Group, Ltd/a.k.a.
Reed Bar Review. All rights reserved. No part of this
publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, recording, or any information
storage and retrieval system, without permission in
writing from the publisher.

Printed in the United States of America.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 1

Basis for personal jurisdiction

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 1

1. Statutory basis: 1) General Personal Jurisdictions: 1) Present when


served, 2) Consent, or 3) Domiciled. Specific personal jurisdiction is long-
arm statute. Most states have a long-arm statute authorizing jurisdiction
for anyone who committed a COA in state. Example - jurisdiction over one
who commits a tort in State X. If out-of-state mfg, argue tort out of state
but injury in state or transaction of business - one isolated act may be
enough.
2. Constitutional basis (due process): Minimum contacts: Purposeful
availment, reasonable anticipation, continuous activity. Fairness; notice.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2

Factors in determining minimum


contacts

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2

Contact: *Purposeful availment* (debatable if TP sent product into forum;


but yes if D makes $ in forum or put in stream of commerce);
*foreseeability* of suit in forum (satisfied if product foreseeably ends up in
forum).
Fairness: Fair play and substantial justice. Analyze *relatedness* between
contact and claim. Claim needs to arise from D’s contact with forum. Not
needed if D has substantial ties (domiciled, present when served, substantial
business) - satisfies general jurisdiction. Burden, interest of state, location
of evidence and witnesses.
Convenience: Doesn’t put D at severe disadvantage in litigation (tough).
State’s interest: Provide forum for its citizens.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 3

In rem / Quasi in rem jurisdiction

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 3

In rem: Basis for jurisdiction is property (COA relates to property). Court


has power to adjudicate rights of all persons in the world.
Quasi in rem: Something incidental to property (rights of people with
respect to property). Must satisfy minimum contacts test. Doesn’t bind D
personally.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 4

Forum non conveniens

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 4

Court may dismiss case if other forum, with personal jurisdiction, is far
more convenient and appropriate. Transfer not possible b/c it’s in a
different judicial system. Decision based on public factors and private
factors (location of witness, evidence). Not granted if P is resident of present
forum.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 5

Subject matter jurisdiction

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 5

Determines state vs. federal court. Must be met for every single claim.
Check for any and all available bases:
* Diversity of citizenship: Amount in controversy >$75k exclusive of
interest and costs, between citizens of different states or countries at time of
filing. Excludes family law cases and probate cases.
* Federal questions: Claim based on federal law - “arising under”.
* Supplemental jurisdiction: Allows federal court to hear related claims w/o
diversity or FQ.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 6

Diversity of citizenship

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 6

Complete diversity required when suit commenced. No P can be same


citizen as any D.
Citizenship=domicile+intent to make fixed home.
For decedents, minors and incompetents represented by fiduciary, use
citizenship of the plaintiff, not the fiduciary. For class action, use citizenship of
representative, not class.
All states where incorporated, and location of PPB (HQ or muscle center).
For partnership/unincorporated associations, citizenship in states of all
members.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 7

Amount in controversy

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 7

Only applies for diversity of citizenship.


* Amount can be aggregated if one P vs one D. Use total value for joint
tortfeasors, or P vs. jointly liable D’s.
* Not costs and interest
* Must be more than - not exactly 75k
* Amount in good faith at start of trial. If final judgment <75k, P may have to
pay costs.
* Injunction: Value of harm must be >75k from P’s view. Minority uses D’s
view - cost D >75k to comply with injunction.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 8

Federal question

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 8

P must be suing to vindicate federal right.


Well-pleaded complaint rule: The federal statute asserted must give the
rights being complained of, and must be plead in complaint.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 9

Supplemental jurisdiction

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 9

* Allows fed court to hear claims w/o subject matter jurisdiction


* Pendent: Claims joined by Plaintiff against same or different D; common
nucleus of operative fact (same transaction or occurrence); court has
discretion not to hear claim.
* Ancillary: Claims joined by Anyone other than the plaintiff; arises from
same transaction or occurrence as underlying case; court has discretion.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 10

Removal

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 10
* Allows D (not P) to have state court case removed to federal court in that jurisdiction, if the case
could have originally been filed in that federal court. If improperly removed, fed court remands to
state.

* Removal must occur w/in 30 days after service of process.

* Case must meet SMJ.

* All D’s must agree.

* P’s cannot remove, even if they are a D by virtue of counterclaim.

* For diversity cases, can’t remove if any D is a citizen of the forum. Can drop a D to evade this
rule.

* Filing permissive counterclaim waives right to remove; compulsive counterclaim doesn’t.

* Notice to remove must be filed w/in 30 days after initial pleading; if case later becomes
removable, w/in 30 days after it becomes so, but no more than 1 yr after initially filed.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 11

What law applies in diversity


cases.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 11

Erie doctrine: In diversity cases, fed court applies state substantive law and
federal procedural law.
* Substantive: Elements of COA, choice of law rules, statute of limitations,
tolling of SOL. If state law would substantively determine the outcome of
the litigation, but not encourage forum shopping, interests of justice, etc.
* Procedural: FRCP or federal common law on point.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 12

Venue

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 12

Determines which location within the judicial system is proper. Improper venue may be
waived.

* Case removed from state to fed: Fed district embracing state court.

* In any case, P can lay venue in any district where:

- ALL D’s reside, or any district if all D’s in same state but different districts; or

- Where substantial part of claim arose

If no district meets that rule, then:

- FQ: Any district where any D is found

- Diversity: Any district where any D is subject to PJ

* Residence: Where any individual resides; where corporation is subject to PJ.

* Land cases must be filed where land is located.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 13

Transfer of venue

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 13

Only transfer to court where case could have been filed:


- If venue in original forum is proper, transfer allowed based on
convenience of parties, convenience of witnesses, interests of justice. New
court applies choice of law rules of original court.
- If venue in original forum is improper, transfer in interests of justice or
dismiss. New court applies law of new court’s state

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 14

Service of process

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 14

Process: Summons + copy of complaint, served by a nonparty.

Methods: Fed ct can use its own methods or state methods:

* Personal: Papers given to D personally, while D in forum state, but not if presence solely as
party or witness in another civil case. Also applies if D has a registered agent.

* Substituted: Process can be left at D’s usual abode, left with someone of suitable age and
discretion who resides there.

* Waiver by mail: Process mailed to D, and D returns waiver form in 30 days. If no waiver, D
liable for personal/substituted service costs.

Must file before SOL runs; and service process w/in 120 days of filing complaint unless good
cause for delay.

Process can be served to D in another state only if state statute allows (long-arm statute), or if it
meets the bulge rule or statutory Interpleader.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 15

Pleadings

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 15

Federal rules uses "notice" pleading - no great detail needed, just enough to
allow meaningful response.
Two recent Supreme Court cases have heightened the pleading requirement of federal cases,
requiring that the allegations in the complaint state a "plausible"—not simply possible—case for recovery.
a. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
In an antitrust case, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants had made an agreement
in restraint of trade. The Supreme Court said that the complaint should be dismissed
because it did not provide facts sufficient to prove that the allegations were plausible,
basically stating that the trial court should inquire into whether a complaint was sufficiently
convincing to allow the suit to continue. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544
(2007).
b. Ashcroft v. Iqbal
In a constitutional tort action, the Supreme Court again ruled that the complaint should be
dismissed because the plaintiff did not state a claim for relief that was plausible on its face.
The Supreme Court further held that the decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. was not to be
limited to antitrust cases. The case expanded the authority of district judges to dismiss
cases that they believe are without merit.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 16

Rule 11

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 16
Attorney or pro se litigant to sign all pleadings, written motions and papers,
certifying that to the best of his knowledge and belief, after reasonable
inquiry:
1. Paper is not for an improper purpose;
2. Legal contentions are warranted by law, or a nonfrivolous argument for
change of the law;
3. Factual contentions have evidentiary support, or likely to after further
investigation; and
4. Denials of factual contentions have evidentiary support, or likely to after
further investigation.
Motion for violation served but not filed; violator has 21 days to withdraw
offending document or else motion will be filed. Court can OSC why
sanctions should not be levied (discretionary).

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 17

Complaint

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 17

Principal pleading by P, commences suit. Must include:


1. Statement of SMJ
2. Short and plain statement of the claim showing entitled to relief; but
fraud, mistake and special damages require particular and specific
pleadings (notice not enough).
3. Demand for judgment

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 18

Response

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 18

D must respond with motion or answer within 21 days after service of


process.
* Request for more specific statement
* Motion to strike immaterial allegations
* Motion to dismiss for lack of SMJ, failure to join indispensable party. PJ,
venue, insufficient process are waivable defenses, and must be put in first
response.
* Failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted; summary
judgment.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 19

Answer

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 19

If motion is denied, answer required 10 days after denial. If D waives


service, answer within 60 days after waiver. Otherwise, w/in 21 days after
service of process.
* Admission
* Denial: Failure to deny is admission
* State lack sufficient information to admit/deny: Effect of denial, but not if
matter is known by D or public knowledge
* Raise affirmative defenses: If not pleaded in answer, waived at trial.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 20

Counterclaim

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 20

Filed with D’s responsive pleading (answer).


* Compulsory: Arises from same transaction or occurrence as P’s claim.
Must be filed in pending case, else D waives right to sue on claim.
* Permissive: Doesn’t arise from same transaction or occurrence. Not
waived by failing to raise.
Counterclaim must have SMJ: Diversity, FQ, or supplemental (ancillary
available for compulsory counterclaims).

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 21

Cross-claim

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 21

Claim against a co-party. Must arise from same transaction or occurrence as


underlying action, but it’s not compulsory.
Ancillary supplemental jurisdiction is available.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 22

Amending pleadings

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 22

* P has a right to amend once before D serves answer, or if no answer served, w/in 21 days after
serving pleading.

* D has right to amend once within 21 days after serving answer.

If no right to amend (above), seek leave of court to amend, and it will be granted, unless causes
delay or prejudice.

If at trial, other party fails to object to evidence (waiver), party can move to amend pleading to
conform to evidence.

Amended pleadings relate back to date of original pleading (SOL purposes) if concern same
conduct, transaction or occurrence as original pleading. Treated as if filed when original was
filed. If amendment changes D, relates back if concerns same conduct, transaction or
occurrence as original; new party knew of action within 120 days after filing; and new party
knew that but for a mistake, it would have been originally named. (P sued wrong D but right D
knew about it when filed).

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 23

Joinder of claims

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 23

Once a party asserts a claim by complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or


impleader, the party may then join any claims, even transactionally
unrelated, that he has against an opposing party, subject to SMJ
requirements.
Note that D must counterclaim on events arising out of same transaction or
occurrence.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 24

Joinder of parties: Permissive

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 24

Who may be joined:


* P’s with claims arising from same transaction or occurrence can sue, and
raise at least one common question, may sue as co-P’s.
* D’s may be named as co-D’s if the claims arise from same transaction or
occurrence and raise at least one common question.
If joinder isn’t feasible (no PJ or joinder would destroy diversity), court
must proceed without him, or dismiss the whole case (TP is indispensable).
Factors: Alternative forum available; likelihood of actual prejudice; court’s
ability to shape relief to avoid prejudice.
All parties must have SMJ.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 25

Joinder of parties: Mandatory

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 25

Who must be joined: Necessary and indispensable parties. Court may order. Joint
tortfeasors are not necessary parties.
* Without absentee, court cannot accord complete relief among parties (worried
about multiple suits);
* Absentee’s interest may be harmed if no joinder; or
* Absentee claims an interest which subjects D to multiple judgments
If joinder isn’t feasible (no PJ or joinder would destroy diversity), court must
proceed without him, or dismiss the whole case (TP is indispensable). Factors:
Alternative forum available; likelihood of actual prejudice; court’s ability to shape
relief to avoid prejudice. All parties must have SMJ.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 26

Impleader

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 26

Joinder of a new third party, usually by D, in vicarious liability case for


indemnity or contribution. D has right to implead w/in 10 days of serving
answer, otherwise court permission needed.
Steps: File TP complaint naming TP, and serve on TP.
Once joined, P and TPD can assert claims between themselves arising from
same transaction or occurrence as original claim.
All parties and claims (i.e. TPD v. P) must have SMJ. D and TPD can have
same state in diversity cases.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 27

Bulge rule

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 27

Absentees joined as necessary party or impleaded may be served out of


state, within 100 miles of courthouse.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 28

Intervention

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 28

Absentee wants to join pending suit, either as P or D. Must be made in a


timely manner.
* Intervention of right: TP’s interest may be harmed if not joined, and not
adequately represented now.
* Permissive: At least one common question exists; at court’s discretion.
If diversity case, and TP would mess up diversity, no supplemental
jurisdiction for permissive, and not for P by right, but maybe for D by
right.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 29

Interpleader

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 29

Stakeholder holding the property or money in dispute forces all potential


claimants into single lawsuit to avoid multiple litigation and inconsistency.
Rule interpleader: Diversity case. Stakeholder must be diverse from all
claimants.
Statutory interpleader: Only one claimant must be diverse from other
claimant (minimal diversity). Only $500 required for amount in
controversy. Venue is in any district where any claimant resides.
Nationwide service of process is available (no PJ problem).

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 30

Requirements for Class action


(CAN’T)

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 30

* Common questions of law or fact


* Adequateness (Representatives and lawyer will fairly and adequately represent
class)
* Numerosity (number of parties are too numerous for practicable joinder)
* Typicality
* SMJ: For diversity, only citizenship of class representative matters. Amount in
controversy is traditionally each member must claim >75k; trend is if
representative’s claim >75k.
* Settlement or dismissal must be approved by court.
2005 - Class Action Fairness Act. 1) Only one plaintiff must be diverse; 2) over 100
members; 3) Amount in aggregate must be over $5M

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 31

Types of class action

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 31

Damages: Common questions predominate, and class action superior


method to handle dispute (efficiency). Examples: Mass tort. Class rep pays to
give individual notice to all reasonably identifiable members telling
them: (1) they can opt out; (2) they will be bound if they do not opt out; (3)
they can enter separate appearance through counsel.
Prejudice: Class treatment necessary to avoid harm to class members or
party opposing class. No right to opt out.
Injunction or declaratory judgment sought b/c class treated alike by other
party (i.e. employment discrimination case). No right to opt out.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 32

Discovery: Required disclosures

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 32

Must be produced even though no one asked for it, within 14 days after
discovery meeting.
1. Initial: Identifies persons and documents with info relevant to disputed
facts alleged w/particularity in the pleadings, computation of damages, and
insurance.
2. Experts: Names and reports.
3. Pretrial: At least 30 days before trial, produce detailed info about trial
evidence, including names of witnesses and documents.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 33

Depositions

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 33

Oral/written.
Can be used against party or nonparty. Nonparty must be subpoenaed;
nonparty doesn’t have to be subpoenaed - notice enough to compel.
Subpoena duces tecum requires deponent to bring papers or materials.
Limit of 10 depos total, only depose a person once, unless court otherwise
authorizes.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 34

Interrogatories

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 34

Questions in writing by party to another party. Must be answered w/in 30


days. No more than 25 interrogs.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 35

Request to produce

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 35

Requests party (or non party with subpoena) to make documents available for
review of documents or things.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 36

Physical or mental examination

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 36

Only available with court order upon showing that party’s health is in
actual controversy and good cause exists.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 37

Request for admission

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 37

Must respond w/in 30 days. Used to authenticate documents.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 38

Discovery tools

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 38

Deposition
Interrogatory
Request to produce
Physical or mental exam
Request for admission

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 39

Duty to supplement

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 39

If party learns that its response to required disclosure is incomplete or


incorrect, it must supplement.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 40

Substantive scope of discovery

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 40

Can discover anything relevant: Reasonably calculated to lead to


admissible evidence.
Privileged matter not discoverable.
Work product: Assumption of non-discoverability. Evidence admissible
upon showing of substantial need and not otherwise available; but mental
impressions, theories, opinions and conclusions are absolutely protected.
Work product can be generated by lawyer or employee of lawyer.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 41

Expert witness

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 41

Required disclosures of name, report.


Other party can take depo if expert is to testify at trial. If not going to
testify, no depo unless exceptional need.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 42

Enforcement of discovery rules

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 42

Motion to compel discovery. If party doesn’t comply with order, court may:
Award costs/fees; order matters treated as admitted; prohibit party from sing
claims/defenses; strike pleadings; dismiss action; render default
judgment; contempt.
Deposed party can request protective order against overburdensome
requests or for trade secrets.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 43

Voluntary dismissal

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 43

P can dismiss before D serves answer or moves for summary judgment.


Dismissal without prejudice. If D already served answer, D has to agree to
dismissal or court must order
Second dismissal is with prejudice, even if first case was in state court.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 44

Default judgment

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 44
A default results from the defendant's failure to respond within the
timeframe set out under Rule 12. A defendant has 21 days from
service of process to respond to a complaint either by an answer or by
a pre-answer motion, or to seek additional time to answer.
Entry of default first by court clerk, then entry of default judgment by
clerk.
If default has been entered, D can move to set aside default by showing
good cause and viable defense.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 45

Dismissal for failure to state a


claim (demurrer)

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 45

12(b)(6) motion. Tests the sufficiency of P’s allegations in complaint, without


looking at evidence. Assumes P’s complaint is true, and asks "if P proves
everything in complaint, is P entitled to judgment." Granted if no COA
exists.
"Motion for judgment on the pleadings" is the same thing, but occurs after
pleadings are closed.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 46

Summary judgment

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 46

Moving party must show (1) no dispute as to material issue of fact, and (2)
moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Court examines (but
doesn’t weigh) evidence proffered by parties (affidavits, but not
pleadings). Motion denied if dispute of fact.
Evidence viewed in light most favorable to non-moving party.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 47

Pretrial conferences

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 47

Court may hold as needed to expedite case and encourage settlement.


The final pretrial order (final blueprint for trial) supercedes the pleadings,
but may be amended to prevent manifest evidence, or evidence admitted that
wasn’t objected to.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 48

Jury trial

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 48

Must demand in writing no later than 14 days after service of last pleading.
Right to jury trial at law for COA’s that existed back in the 1790’s, but not
for equity. If case involves both, jury for law issues but not equity; jury trial
goes first.
Selection: Unlimited strikes for cause; 3 peremptory strikes per side, but
must be race and gender neutral.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 49

Judgment as a matter of law


(directed verdict)

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 49

Takes case away for jury. Standard is if reasonable people could not
disagree on the results. Evidence viewed in light most favorable to
nonmoving party.
Brought after other side has been heard. D can move twice: at close of P’s
evidence and close of all evidence. P can move only at end of all evidence.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 50

Judgment Notwithstanding the


Verdict

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 50

Jury returns verdict, and court enters judgment. Losing party files renewed
motion for judgment as a matter of law, within 28 days after entry of
judgment.
Standard: Reasonable people could not disagree on the results. Evidence
viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party.
Prerequisite: Motion for judgment as a matter of law at close of all evidence
(end of the trial) is a prerequisite.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 51

Motion for new trial

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 51

Judgment entered, but errors at trial require new trial. Move 28 days after
entry of judgment.
Grounds: Error at trial makes judgment unfair; new evidence that could
not have been obtained with due diligence at original trial; prejudicial
misconduct of party, atty, TP or juror; judgment against weight of
evidence; inadequate or excessive verdict.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 52

Summary judgment

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 52

No genuine issue of material fact moving party entitled to judgment as a


matter of law. May be supported by pleadings, affidavits, discovery
materials.
TIME TO FILE A MOTION. Unless a different time is set by local rule or the
court orders otherwise, a party may file a motion for summary judgment at
any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 53

Final judgment rule

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 53

Generally, party can appeal only from final judgment. If the trial court has
anything left to do on the merits, no appeal available.
Not final: Denial of motion for summary judgment, grant for motion of new
trial. But granting or denying a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of
law (JNOV) is a final judgment.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 54

Interlocutory review

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 54

Allows court of appeals to review matter before final judgment.


Allowed for: Injunctions, receivers, attachments to property, review of order
granting/denying class action, and any nonfinal order of trial judge if he certifies
that it involves a controlling issue of law as to which there is substantial grounds for
difference of opinion and court of appeals agrees to hear it.
Court of appeals may hear a collateral order rule (distinct from merits of case) if
important legal question which would be unreviewable at end of case.
Extraordinary writ: Asking appeals court to order trial judge to do make or vacate a
certain order. Available only to enforce clear legal duty.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 55

Res Judicata

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 55

Affirmative defense: You can only sue on a cause of action once.


Requirements:
1. Both cases by same P against same D.
2. Case 1 ended in valid final judgment on the merits (includes default
judgments).
3. Both cases involve the same claim (transaction or occurrence; but
minority has separate claims for property damage and personal injury
from same transaction).
Merger: Claimant won prior case. Bar: Claimant lost prior case.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 56

Collateral estoppel

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 56
Precludes relitigation of particular issue previously litigated and determined. Narrower than res judicata.

Requirements:

1. Case 1 ended in valid final judgment on the merits.

2. Same issue was actually litigated and determined in first case.

3. Issue was essential to the judgment in case 1.

4. Can only be asserted against a party to prior suit, or a representative.

5. Can only be asserted by a party to prior suit, or a representative (mutual). Minority allows any person to
assert (nonmutual).

Nonmutual defensive CE: Person using it is the D, and wasn’t a party to prior case. Allowed if P had full
oppt’y to litigate issue in first case.

Nonmutual offensive CE: Person using it is the P, and wasn’t a party to prior case, to show that an element of
the claim has already been proven. Factors: D had full oppt’y to litigate first case, could foresee multiple
litigation, P could not have easily joined first case, and no inconsistent judgments on record..

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 57

Timing of Rule 12 defenses

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 57

Raised anytime:
Lack of SMJ
Failure to state a claim
Failure to join a party
Raised by first motion or answer, else waived:
Lack of PJ
Improper venue
Insufficient process/service

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd
CIVIL PROCEDURE 58

Remittitur and Additur


CIVIL PROCEDURE 58
If the court determines that a verdict was excessive, the court may offer a
reduction of the verdict, known as a remittitur, and grant a new trial on
the condition that the remittitur is not accepted. See Hetzel v. Prince
William Cnty., 523 U.S. 208 (1998). If the court determines that the
verdict was inadequate, the court only has the option of ordering a new
trial. An additur (enhanced judgment) is not permitted in federal court.

Timing: Pursuant to Rule 59 (b) a motion for a new trial must be filed no
later than 28 days after the entry of judgment. When the motion is based
on affidavits, those affidavits must be filed with the motion. The
opposing party then has 14 days after being served to file opposing
affidavits. The court may permit reply affidavits. Rule 59(c).

Order by the Court on Its Own Initiative: Pursuant to Rule 59(d), no


later than 28 days after the entry of judgment, the court, on its own, may
order a new trial for any reason that would justify granting one on the
motion of a party. The court must specify the reasons in its order.

www.ReedBarReview.com
Reed Law Group, Ltd

You might also like