You are on page 1of 4

Vox Sanguinis (2009) 96, 266–269

© 2008 The Author(s)


REPORT Journal compilation © 2008 International Society of Blood Transfusion
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01144.x

Recommendations of the ISBT Working Party on Granulocyte


Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Immunobiology for leucocyte antibody screening in the


investigation and prevention of antibody-mediated
transfusion-related acute lung injury
ISBT Working Party on Granulocyte Immunobiology; (P. Bierling,1 J. Bux,2 B. Curtis,3 B. Flesch,4 l. Fung,5 G. Lucas,6
M. Macek,7 E. Muniz-Diaz,8 l. Porcelijn,9 A. Reil,2 U. Sachs,10 R. Schuller,11 N. Tsuno,12 M. Uhrynowska,13 S. Urbaniak,14
N. Valentin,15 A. Wikman16 & B. Zupanska13)
1
Platelet and Leucocyte Immunology Laboratory, EFS Ile de France, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
2
Leucocyte and Platelet Immunology Laboratory, Blood Service West of the German Red Cross, Hagen, Germany
3
The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Platelet and Neutrophil Immunology Laboratory, Milwaukee, USA
4
Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
5
Australian Red Cross Blood Service-Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
6
Platelet and Granulocyte Immunology Laboratory, National Blood Service, Bristol, UK
7
Blood Transfusion Center of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
8
Centre de Transfusio I Banc de Teixitis, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, P. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
9
Sanquin Diagnostics, Immunohaematology Diagnostic Department, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
10
Institute for Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Gießen, Germany
11
American Red Cross North Central Blood Services, Neutrophil Serology Laboratory, St. Paul, USA
12
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
13
Department of Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine, Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw, Poland
14
Aberdeen and North East Scotland Blood Centre, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Aberdeen, UK
15
Platelet and Leucocyte Immunology Laboratory, Institute of Biology, Nantes, France
16
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Background Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is currently one of the


most common causes of transfusion-related major morbidity and death. Among the
many TRALI mediators, leucocyte antibodies have been identified as important
triggers of severe TRALI.
Study Design and Methods These recommendations were compiled by experts of the
ISBT Working Party on Granulocyte Immunobiology, based on the results obtained in
eight international granulocyte immunology workshops, their personal experiences
and on published study results.
Results Leucocyte antibody screening has to include the detection of human leucocyte
antigen (HLA) class I, class II and human neutrophil alloantigen antibodies using
established and validated techniques. HLA class I antibody detection should be
restricted to antibodies clinically relevant for TRALI. To avoid unnecessary workload,
TRALI diagnosis should be assessed by consultation with the reporting clinician and
thorough exclusion of transfusion-associated circulatory overload/cardiac insufficiency.
In patients diagnosed with TRALI having donors with detectable leucocyte antibodies,
evidence of leucocyte incompatibility should be provided by either cross-matching or
typing of patient for cognate antigen.

Correspondence: Dr Jürgen Bux, Blood Service West of the German Red Cross, Feithstrasse 182, D-58097 Hagen, Germany
E-mail: j.bux@bsdwest.de

266
Leucocyte antibody detection in TRALI 267

Conclusion Leucocyte antibody screening for the immunological clarification of


TRALI cases as well as for identification of potentially alloimmunized blood donors
Received: 17 October 2008,
revised 21 November 2008,
is feasible and can be performed in a reasonable and quality assured manner. This
accepted 22 November 2008, practice can contribute to the prevention of antibody-mediated TRALI.
published online 29 December 2008 Key words: TRALI, HNA, leucocyte antibody detection

Workshops established in 1989. The combination of GIFT and


Introduction GAT remains the best means of detection and has become the
Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is a clinical standard approach in most of the laboratories participating
diagnosis that is the symptomatic expression of a non- in the international workshops [6,7]. GIFT is widely considered
cardiogenic lung oedema induced by blood transfusion [1,2] to be the more sensitive technique; however, GAT has an
in which transfusion overload is excluded. Soon after the first enhanced ability to detect granulocyte agglutinins (leucoag-
descriptions, TRALI has been associated with leucocyte antibodies glutinins), such as antibody to HNA-3a (former 5b).
in donor and on rare occasions in recipient blood [3,4]. After Granulocyte agglutinins have been associated with severe
publication of an abundance of clinical and experimental (i.e. mechanical ventilation required) and fatal cases of TRALI
data in the last decade, it is generally accepted that TRALI can [4,8]. Not only does GAT offer the advantage of assessing the
be triggered by leucocyte antibodies [2]. These antibody-mediated antibody’s clinical significance, but it also has the ability to
cases are often classified as ‘immune’ TRALI that can be distin- detect other agglutinins that have not been classified.
guished from ‘non-immune’ TRALI reactions that can be induced, Alternative methods should be validated using neutrophil-
for example, by cytokines or soluble neutrophil-priming lipids specific sera, which have been well-characterized by
[5]. Therefore, identification of alloimmunized donors and participating International Granulocyte Immunology
recipients in TRALI cases and screening donors at risk for the Workshops laboratories. At a minimum, any other validated
presence of leucocyte antibodies have been considered as a method should have equivalent sensitivity and specificity to
preventive measure for antibody-mediated TRALI. The the combination of both GIFT and GAT.
following recommendations are made to provide a basis for If possible, the HNA specificity of detected antibodies
appropriate and qualified leucocyte antibody detection. should be confirmed in an antigen-specific assay, such as the
monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of granulocyte
antigens assay.
Leucocyte antibodies, antigens and techniques
for antibody detection
Human leucocyte antigen antibody detection
Leucocyte antibodies to be detected: (i) human neutrophil
alloantigen (HNA) antibodies; (ii) human leucocyte antigen The recommendations for HLA antibody detection techniques
(HLA) class I antibodies; and (iii) HLA class II antibodies. are based on their current use. Some investigators prefer
Leucocyte antigens at least to be covered by panel: (i) anti-globulin tests for HLA antibody detection as they also
HNA-1a, -1b, -2 and -3a; (ii) HLA class II; and (iii) HLA-A2 detect non-complement activating antibodies. The majority
and other frequent HLA class I antigens. of currently used HLA class I antibody screening tests are
Techniques for the detection of HNA antibodies: (i) granulo- designed for transplantation needs and these are therefore
cyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT); (ii) granulocyte both very sensitive and also designed to detect antibodies to
agglutination test (GAT); (iii) granulocyte chemiluminescence low frequency antigens.
test; and (iv) any other validated test. In the May 2008 granulocyte workshop discussion, this
Techniques for the detection of HLA class I antibodies: working party raised the question regarding the clinical
(i) enzyme immunoassay; (ii) flow cytometry with microbeads; relevance of detecting weak and low frequency HLA antibodies
(iii) lymphocytotoxicity; (iv) lymphocyte immunofluorescence; in TRALI for the following reasons: (i) transfused HLA class
and (iv) any other validated test. I antibodies are primarily adsorbed to platelets and soluble
Techniques for the detection of HLA class II antibodies: HLA class I molecules that represent 90% of the HLA class I
(i) enzyme immunoassay; (ii) flow cytometry with microbeads; antigens in blood [9]; (ii) it is unlikely that an antibody
and (iii) any other validated test. directed against a low frequency HLA class I antigen will be
transfused into a patient who carries the cognate antigen and
who is susceptible to TRALI.
Human neutrophil alloantigen antibody detection
Reports demonstrate that only few transfused HLA class I
Recommendations for HNA antibody detection are based on antibodies will actually induce TRALI [10–12]. These findings
the experience of the International Granulocyte Immunology are in accordance with the questionable clinical relevance of

© 2008 The Author(s)


Journal compilation © 2008 International Society of Blood Transfusion, Vox Sanguinis (2009) 96, 266–269
268 ISBT Working Party on Granulocyte Immunobiology

weakly reactive HLA antibodies detected in assays with should be typed for the cognate antigens recognized by the
increased sensitivity. detected leucocyte antibodies. In cases where the cognate
Since sera from alloimmunized individuals usually contain antigens are present, the leucocyte antibodies likely caused
a mixture of different HLA class I antibodies resulting in a or contributed to the TRALI reaction.
more or less pronounced broad reactivity [13,14], most
alloimmunized donors will be identified even if a less
comprehensive panel of HLA class I antigens is used for HLA Leucocyte antibody screening in blood donors
antibody screening. Screening blood donors for leucocyte antibodies is a possible
strategy to reduce the risk of antibody-mediated TRALI.
Transplanted donors, parous female donors, and, to a lesser
Clinical cases with apparent pulmonary
extent depending on the custom to transfuse leucocyte-reduced
transfusion reactions
blood components, transfused donors are most likely to have
leucocyte alloantibodies. Leucocyte antibody screening, that
Diagnosis of transfusion-related acute lung injury
is, HLA class I, class II, and HNA, should be performed using
Diagnosis of transfusion-related acute lung injury [1]: (i) acute the techniques listed above. Blood components with a high
respiratory distress; (ii) temporal association with blood plasma fraction (typically fresh-frozen plasma, apheresis
transfusion, that is, occurrence within 6 h of transfusion platelets and whole blood) should not be prepared from blood
(typically within 2 h); (iii) new bilateral infiltrations in the donated by donors with leucocyte antibodies. In the case of
chest radiogram; and (iv) careful exclusion of (the more HNA-3a antibodies, deferral of the donor from blood
frequent) transfusion-associated circulatory overload (hyper- donation should be considered, as these antibodies have been
tension, pre-to-post transfusion elevation of B-type natriuretic frequently implicated in fatal TRALI reactions [12,16] and
peptide (BNP) levels, history of and/or radiographic signs of one fatal TRALI reaction occurred even after transfusion of
heart failure). red blood cells [12]. Donors with negative test results for
Since TRALI investigation can be complex, it is important leucocyte antibodies should be retested only after re-exposure
to assess the case with the reporting clinician, document the to leucocyte antigens.
clinical symptoms and to confirm clinical diagnosis [15].

References
Samples to be tested
1 Kleinman S, Caulfield T, Chan P, Davenport R, McFarland J,
Leucocyte antibody screening for HLA class I, class II and McPhedran S, Meade M, Morrison D, Pinsent T, Robillard P,
HNA antibodies using the techniques listed above should be Slinger P: Toward an understanding of transfusion-related acute
performed on blood donations/donors that were transfused lung injury: statement of a consensus panel. Transfusion 2004;
within 6 h of the suspected TRALI reaction. Donor investigation 44:1774 –1789
can be prioritized on the likelihood of the donor having 2 Sachs UJH, Bux J: The pathogenesis of transfusion-related acute
leucocyte antibodies such as parous female donors and trans- lung injury (TRALI). Br J Haematol 2007; 136:788 –799
fused donors. It should be noted that male donors have been 3 Ward HN: Pulmonary infiltrates associated with leukoagglutinin
transfusion reactions. Ann Intern Med 1970; 73:689– 694
implicated in TRALI and that inappropriately stored residual
4 Thompson JS, Severson CD, Parmely MJ, Marmorstein BI,
specimens from blood bags as well serum samples can cause
Simmons A: Pulmonary ‘hypersensitivity’ reactions induced by
false-positive test results. transfusion of non-HL-A leukoagglutinins. N Engl J Med 1971;
If non-leucocyte-reduced platelets or red blood cells were 284:1120 –5
transfused, the recipient’s blood should be also investigated 5 Bux J: Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI): a
for leucocyte antibodies. serious adverse event of blood transfusion. Vox Sang 2005;
89:1–10
6 Bux J, Chapman J: Report on the second International
Provision of evidence of leucocyte incompatibility Granulocyte Serology Workshop. Transfusion 1997; 37:977–
When a donor leucocyte antibody is detected, a cross-match 983
between donor serum/plasma and recipients leucocytes is 7 Lucas G, Rogers S, de Haas M, Porcelijn L, Bux J: Report on the
fourth International Granulocyte Immunology Workshop:
recommended. When a recipient leucocyte antibody is
progress toward quality assessment. Transfusion 2002; 42:462–
detected, the cross-match is between recipient serum/plasma
468
and donor leucocytes. Note that in the case of HNA antibodies 8 Nordhagen R, Conradi M, Drömtorp SM: Pulmonary reaction
a granulocyte cross-match must be performed. associated with transfusion of plasma containing anti-5b. Vox
In cases where suitable cells for cross-matching are not Sang 1986; 51:102 –107
available, the recipient, and when necessary the donor, 9 Kao KJ, Scornik JC, Riley WJ, McQueen CF: Association between

© 2008 The Author(s)


Journal compilation © 2008 International Society of Blood Transfusion, Vox Sanguinis (2009) 96, 266–269
Leucocyte antibody detection in TRALI 269

HLA phenotype and HLA concentration in plasma or platelets. antibodies to private versus public specificities in potential
Hum Immunol 1988; 21:115 –124 transplant recipients. Hum Immunol 1994; 39:272 – 280
10 Toy P, Hollis-Perry KM, Jun J, Nakagawa M: Recipients of blood 14 Rodey GE, Revels K, Fuller TC: Epitope specificity of HLA class I
from a donor with multiple HLA antibodies: a lookback study of alloantibodies. II. Stability of cross-reactive group antibody
transfusion-related acute lung injury. Transfusion 2004; patterns over extended time periods. Transplantation 1997;
44:1683–1688 63:885– 893
11 Cooling L: Transfusion-related acute lung injury. JAMA 2002; 15 Su L, Kamel H: How do we investigate and manage donors
288:315–316 associated with a suspected case of transfusion related acute
12 Reil A, Keller-Stanislawski B, Günay S, Bux J: Specificities of lung injury. Transfusion 2007; 47:1118 –1124
leukocyte alloantibodies in transfusion-related acute lung injury 16 Davoren A, Curtis BR, Shulman IA, Mohrbacher AF, Bux J,
and results of leukocyte antibody screening of blood donors. Vox Kwiatkowska BJ, McFarland JG, Aster RH: TRALI due to
Sang 2008; 95:313 –317 granulocyte-agglutinating human neutrophil antigen-3a(5b)
13 Rodey GE, Neylan JF, Whechel JD, Revels KW, Bray RA: Epitope alloantibodies in donor plasma: a report of 2 fatalities.
specificity of HLA class I alloantibodies. I. Frequency analysis of Transfusion 2003; 43:641– 645

© 2008 The Author(s)


Journal compilation © 2008 International Society of Blood Transfusion, Vox Sanguinis (2009) 96, 266–269

You might also like