CUY MED Traffic Study PID 116069 Preliminary Feasibility Study

8235 Mohawk Dr, Cleveland, OH 44136
a
www.euthenics-inc.com
PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY

CUY/MED TRAFFIC STUDY
PID 116069
REPORT PREPARED ON: JUNE 2, 2023

PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF STRONGSVILLE
16099 FOLTZ PKWY
STRONGSVILLE, OHIO 44149
PREPARED BY:
EUTHENICS, INC.
8235 MOHAWK DRIVE
STRONGSVILLE, OHIO 44136
(440) 260-1555
TRANSYSTEMS
1100 SUPERIOR AVE EAST, SUITE 1000
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction and Project History ........................................................................... 4
II. Preliminary Purpose and Need............................................................................... 8
III. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 10
IV. Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................... 11
V. Key Issues ........................................................................................................... 18
Safety:.................................................................................................................................................... 18
Traffic Analysis: ................................................................................................................................... 18
Roadway Design Issues: ....................................................................................................................... 18
Maintenance of Traffic: ...................................................................................................................... 18
Structural Design Issues: ..................................................................................................................... 18
Environmental Analysis: ...................................................................................................................... 18
Utility Impacts: .................................................................................................................................... 18
Estimated Construction Cost: ............................................................................................................ 19
VI. Comparison of Alternatives - Traffic ..................................................................... 19
VII. Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 22
VIII.Next Steps ........................................................................................................... 22
Page 1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Estimated Cost of Construction and Right-of-Way in $Millions
Table 2 – Total Delay for Study Area Intersections
Table 3 – Total Delay for Study Area Freeway
Table 4 – Ramp Influence Area Density Comparison
Table 5 – Alternative Performance Comparison
Table 6 – Traffic Delay Benefit to Cost Ratio
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Recent Timeline Milestones
Figure 2 – Study Limits
Figure 3 – No Build/Existing Conditions Exhibit
Figure 4 – Alternative 1 Layout Exhibit
Figure 8 – Full Interchange Layout Exhibit
Page 2
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Traffic Analysis Points
Appendix B – Preliminary Project Initiation Package
Appendix C – Safety Priorities
Appendix D – Crash Analysis
Appendix E – Environmental Overview
Appendix F – Utilities
Appendix G – Traffic Volumes Methodology
Appendix H – Traffic Plates
Appendix I – Supporting Traffic Information
Appendix J – Traffic Analyses
Appendix K – Level of Service Comparison Exhibits
Appendix L – HCS Analysis - Intersections
Appendix M – HCS Analysis – Freeway Facility
Appendix N – Turn Lane Length Calculations
Page 3
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT HISTORY
Introduction
Pursuant to Section 755.20 (A) of Ohio House Bill (HB) 110, on April 4, 2022, The City of Strongsville,
Ohio was authorized by its council to contract with Euthenics, Inc. for professional engineering
services to begin preliminary work (Part 1A) to perform a traffic study to examine how to improve
roads and highways to increase the safety and convenience of the traveling public through the cities
of Strongsville and Brunswick. Part 1B work IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT because it is not
authorized by the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA). Part 1B of the study
includes the Environmental Field Studies, a Public Involvement Plan, Public Involvement,
development of an Alternative Evaluation Report (AER) and development of an Interchange
Justification Study (IJS) on the Preferred Alternative. The Part 1A scope of work was defined at a
meeting with the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) District 12, Northeast Ohio Areawide
Coordinating Agency (NOACA), the City of Strongsville and its Consultant.
Part 1A contains a collection and analysis of traffic data and review of preliminary engineering in
prior studies. A Preliminary Feasibility Study and Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement are
prepared. Preliminary reporting will change over time as more information becomes available during
Part 1B activities. Traffic counts with analysis are included and will be reviewed and approved to
obtain Certified Traffic. Part 1A is commissioned to begin the process of identifying and analyzing
feasible alternatives building upon previous studies. The complete preliminary engineering study
and analysis (Parts 1A and 1B) will eventually identify feasible alternatives and identify a preferred
alternative. Part 1A does not contain Certified Traffic. The Highway Capacity Software (HCS)
modeling system is used to generate future conditions. Part 1A does NOT offer a Preferred
Alternative. This project will follow the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) Project
Development Process (PDP) policy, and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) laws.
Preliminary assessment indicates that this project will follow a Path 3 (new interchange with existing
overpass/underpass) of ODOT’s PDP, but it is too early to make a final determination because full
impacts are unknown. A typical feasibility study (FS) provides the information needed to recommend
a NEPA documentation level, we anticipate a D2 level. As part of the PDP, ODOT Office of Roadway
Engineering is required to review and approve all Feasibility Studies and Alternative Evaluation
Reports involving any interstate interchange.
NOACA prepared several reports in 2017 and 2018 on the I-71 corridor in conjunction with ODOT.
Those studies investigated improving traffic congestion along the highway and identified a partial
interchange at Boston Road and I-71 as the alternative with the highest potential return on
investment. Part 1A builds upon those findings. Opening Year will be 2027 and Design Year is 2047
for this study.
The location of this study runs along the I-71 corridor and is bound at Royalton Road (SR 82) to the
north, Center Road (SR 303) to the south, West 130th Street to the east, and Howe, Pearl (US 42),
and North Carpenter Roads to the west. Boston Road is a County Road that is split between two
Cities, in two Counties, in two ODOT Districts.
A map of the Study Area is shown in Figure 1.
Page 4
Figure 1 – Study Area
Project History
I-71 is an interstate highway that connects Cleveland to Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio and
Louisville, Kentucky. The corridor is important for transportation of freight, goods and services,
and for use by regional travelers and those who live and work in the area. Travel and access along
I-71, through the study area for this project, has been analyzed for decades. NOACA studied the
area in the mid-1980s and in 1998. More recent studies include ODOT’s Existing and Future
Conditions Report, Boston Road/I‐71 Interchange No‐Build Alternatives Study (2008), ODOT’s
Further Evaluation of Safety Improvements and Congestion Mitigation for the SR 82 Corridor near
the I‐71 Interchange (2012), ODOT’s I‐71 at SR 82 EB Interchange Operations Study (2015), NOACA’s
IR‐71 Corridor Study and IR‐71 Corridor Study: Boston Rd. Partial Interchange (2017), NOACA’s IR‐
Page 5
71 Corridor Study: Boston Rd. Partial Interchange Origin‐Destination Analysis (2018), and ODOT’s
Boston Road Interchange Study (2020).
NOACA, the metropolitan planning organization for the study area, began identifying potential
additional interchange access locations along the I-71 corridor in the mid-1980’s. The first point of
access study prepared by NOACA in 1984, indicated that an interchange with Boston Road had a
finding of “sufficient justification” based upon projected traffic volume increases in southwest
Cuyahoga and northern Medina counties. A regional freeway study was performed by NOACA in 1990
and found that I-71/Boston Road was one of the most likely locations for a new interchange with I-
71 in Cuyahoga and Medina Counties. In 1995 and again in 1999, NOACA updated the previous
planning work with the I-71/Boston Road Point of Access Justification Study and refined the study
area to include several interchange configurations. Each and every alternative studied planned for
proposed improvements to Boston Road.
The Boston Road widening project (ODOT PID 4067) was programmed in 1997 and a design
consultant, R. E. Warner & Associates, was hired by the City of Brunswick. Plan development
progressed with Stage 1 and Stage 2 Plans completed and the Environmental Document approved on
November 20, 2001, using federal funds. During the final plan development on July 16, 2002, it was
discovered that there was a potential problem with a private utility’s assets (two (2) 12-inch
petroleum pipelines) located in an easement outside of the public right-of-way that runs primarily
parallel and along the southern right-of-way line of Boston Road. The pipeline was impacted by the
proposed design. Buckeye Pipeline (now Buckeye Partners) was engaged with the help of ODOT
District 3 and on March 30, 2004, Buckeye Pipeline responded that 1.7 miles of their pipeline would
have to be relocated to accommodate the current design at an unexpected cost of more than $2.5
million. This all transpired during a national economic recession beginning in 2000 and the will to
invest in infrastructure was low. In 2005, the Cuyahoga County Engineer (CCE) offered to take
ownership of the Boston Road widening project with the intent of adjusting the original design
geometry to avoid impacts to the pipeline thereby reducing the cost. This shifted the dynamics from
Brunswick and Medina County as the lead agencies to Strongsville and Cuyahoga County, and on April
27, 2006, it was ratified by Cuyahoga County and over a year later on November 26, 2007, passed
consent legislation. After further study and no acceptable solution to the interested parties, the
project was at a standstill. In the public interest of assuring that projects planned and designed
using federal funding move forward to construction, FHWA and ODOT requested a status update in
January 2011. Brunswick committed in its contract with FHWA and ODOT that the Boston Road
widening project would use federal funds for engineering and that Brunswick would build the project
before the 10-year timeframe elapsed or repay the funds. After an appeal, the reimbursement
requirement was forgiven by FHWA. No planning work has been performed to widen Boston Road
since then. This background is important because widening Boston Road is integral to an interchange
with I-71.
Boston Road: In 1997, the City of Brunswick sponsored a project to reconstruct and widen Boston
Road from US 42 to the existing 3 lane pavement section near the intersection of West 130th
Street. One of the reasons for the project was preparation for an interchange. The design provided
one lane in each direction and a two-way left turn lane with a face of curb to face of curb distance
of approximately 36’-6”. A modern curbed pavement with a closed stormwater drainage system in
addition to tree lawns and sidewalks on both sides was proposed and would replace what could be
considered the rural typical section that consisted of non-curbed pavement with roadway ditches
that have steep slopes close to the travel lanes at several locations through the corridor. A new
sanitary sewer and waterline were planned for a portion of the corridor. The existing longitudinal
roadway grade which exceeds 10% at the west end of the project was to be reduced to a grade less
Page 6
of less than 10%. The new road section was designed symmetrically along the existing centerline of
right-of-way. Those plans have been discarded.
I-71 Corridor & Boston Road: The area of interest for this study was previously analyzed by the
NOACA in studies of the I-71 corridor dating back to 1987. NOACA’s IR‐71 Corridor Study, completed
in June 2017, reviewed I-71 from I-80 to US 224 in Cuyahoga and Medina Counties for operational
improvements to reduce congestion and improve safety in the corridor. One alternative
recommended in this study was the addition of a partial interchange at Boston Road and I-71,
alternatives for which were further studied in NOACA’s IR‐71 Corridor Study: Boston Rd. Partial
Interchange in November 2017 and IR‐71 Corridor Study: Boston Rd. Partial Interchange Origin‐
Destination Analysis in January 2018. The Boston Road studies analyzed multiple partial interchange
options at Boston Road and I-71 and the potential resulting improvements.
Low-Cost Congestion Mitigation: Findings from previous studies recommend a new interchange
on I-71 at Boston Road, either as a full or partial interchange. The 2012 ODOT-commissioned safety
study confirmed that all low-cost alternatives have been identified and evaluated before any large-
cost alternatives were pursued. It also found that three of the four mid-level alternatives would
not be feasible with future traffic volumes; the fourth alternative, a two-lane entrance ramp from
SR 82 eastbound to I-71 northbound was further studied in the 2015 Interchange Operation Study
(IOS) and subsequently constructed. The 2017 NOACA studies, as part of a larger I-71 corridor study,
considered reducing congestion and improving safety at the I-71 and SR 82 interchange which
included the study of full and partial interchanges at I-71 and Boston Road. Strongsville completed
a citywide traffic signal safety upgrade project that helped ease congestion on SR 82 and a few of
the intersecting roads. The 2020 ODOT study is the latest in the series of analyses performed in this
area, with a focus on improving congestion and safety around I-71 and SR 82. The primary purpose
of the study was to see if the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) would allow the partial
interchange alternative to determine a feasible alternative for further evaluation at Boston Road.
Partial interchanges must be approved by FHWA since they may adversely impact their interstate
system. FHWA’s review of this study indicated a partial interchange is a feasible alternative. This
study evaluated several alignments for an interchange at Boston Road and found that an acceptable
level of service (LOS) would be provided at the proposed interchange while also reducing congestion
at the I-71/SR 82 and I-71/SR 303 interchanges. Level of Service (LOS) is a measure of the quality
of motor vehicle traffic service with “A” being free-flow, and “F” stop-and-go with reduced comfort
for the driver. Under ODOT’s Ramp Clear program, ramp improvements were made to the I-71 &
SR 303 interchange to improve free flow of traffic on the interstate and based upon the findings of
previous studies, a Boston Road Interchange is a logical solution. See Figure 2 Timeline Milestones.
Page 7
Figure 2 - Timeline Milestones
II. PRELIMINARY PURPOSE AND NEED

Project Purpose
The purpose of the Preliminary Feasibility Study / CUY/MED Traffic Study is to research and analyze
alternatives that will improve mobility along the I-71 corridor and the local roadway network within
the study region, particularly at Boston Road and the adjacent interchange roadways of SR 82 and
SR 303 and in the communities of Strongsville and Brunswick.
The study is unique in that it explores options for an I-71 interchange with Boston Road and affiliated
improvements needed to the adjacent transportation network impacted to improve and redistribute
existing traffic movement within this transportation network.
Page 8
Need Elements
Improve Mobility
The primary need for this project is to improve mobility throughout the road network studied.
Meeting traffic demand in the study area and providing more efficient movement of people and
goods is a common theme across the previous studies performed. Mobility concerns are evident in
the poor access to I-71 from the impacted communities, congestion throughout the corridor, and
the specific crash types observed in the study area.
The existing SR 82 and SR 303 interchanges with I-71 are approximately five miles apart. It takes
approximately 10 minutes to drive (freeflow traffic) to I-71 from the southern limits of Strongsville
and the northern limits of Brunswick, where the predominately residential areas are located. Access
to I-71 is about a four-minute drive (freeflow traffic) from the commercial centers of Strongsville
and Brunswick.
No Build: Highway Capacity Software (HCS) intersection capacity analyses showed that several of
the intersections that were studied will operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) in the
future in the No Build condition. Approaches at the intersections of SR 82/Howe Road and Drake
Road/Hunt Road operate at LOS E in the PM peak in the 2027 Opening Year scenario. Many of these
approaches worsen in the 2047 Design Year and begin to operate at an unacceptable LOS. In the
2047 Design Year, the intersections of SR 82/Howe Road, US 42/Boston Road, and Drake Road/Hunt
Road will operate at an unacceptable LOS for the No Build condition.
Crash data from the ODOT’s TIMS GCAT database (2019-2021) for the study area (the SR 82 and SR
303 interchanges at I-71, US 42, Howe Road/North Carpenter Road, and W 130th Street from SR 82
to SR 303) shows a higher concentration of crashes occurring around the two I-71 interchanges
compared to the rest of the road networks. Additionally, the predominant crash type observed was
rear end, which is associated with congestion.
Improving mobility by constructing one of the Build alternative interchanges at Boston Road now
being studied will allow for an increased movement of people and goods within the study area by
redistributing traffic on roads that are designed for it. The interstate will not have significant
negative impacts as the result of an interchange. Additionally, as part of this study, improving
mobility through the study area is anticipated to disperse existing and projected traffic volumes
throughout the study area which, in turn, will reduce congestion, improve air quality and lower
crash concentrations.
Logical Termini and Independent Utility

The logical termini were established by considering the potential improvements that could be
implemented to address the identified mobility needs for this study. These limits are from SR 82 to
the north, SR 303 to the south, and West 130th Street to the east, and Howe, US 42, and North
Carpenter Roads to the west.
Proposed transportation improvements within the study area do not depend on any other projects
outside of the logical termini to meet the established purpose and need. Therefore, independent
utility is established for this transportation improvement.
Page 9
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Boston Road: Boston Road over I-71 is currently a two-lane major collector roadway with one lane
serving westbound traffic and one serving eastbound traffic. Boston Road is a county road and has
no direct access to I-71. Two interchanges immediately to the north and to the south include I-71/
SR 82 and I-71/ SR 303, respectively.
Interstate-71: Interstate-71 carries three lanes in each of the northbound and southbound direction
through most of the study area. The eastbound SR 82 ramp to I-71 northbound was widened from
one lane to two lanes in 2016 to alleviate congestion on eastbound SR 82 and on Howe Road. In
2019, an auxiliary lane was provided along I-71 southbound between the Ohio Turnpike and SR 82
changing that segment from three lanes to four. The exit ramp to SR 82 westbound was widened
from one lane to two lanes. The project was as a low-cost mitigation project to move traffic that
backed up onto the interstate during peak traffic off of I-71 onto ramps to SR 82 but was not a
capacity improvement project. Both were constructed using ODOT Safety funding. The
consequence of increasing storage on the ramps resulted in the congestion moving downstream onto
the local roadway system.
SR 82: The I-71/SR 82 interchange is approximately 2.5 miles north of Boston Road and serves traffic
from Strongsville, North Royalton, commuters from the south, and other neighboring communities.
The land use to the west of the interchange along SR 82 is a mix of commercial and retail. At SR 82,
a single ramp exists for the movements of SR 82 entrance to I-71 southbound and the I-71 northbound
exit to SR 82. Pairs of ramps facilitate each of the southbound exit and northbound entrance
movements with I-71. One exit ramp is designated for each of the westbound and eastbound
movements onto SR 82 (Figure 6, SR 82 Nodes 1 and 2). Similarly, one entrance ramp is designated
for each of the westbound and eastbound movements from SR 82 (Figure 6, SR 82 Nodes 5 and 6).
Within the study area, SR 82 primarily has seven lanes west of I-71, seven lanes across the overpass
bridge, and has four lanes east of the I-71 interchange. SR 82 is as wide as eight lanes near the Howe
Road intersection. Dual left turn lanes exist at three legs of the SR 82 and Howe Road intersection
and dual right turn lanes exist at one leg (Figure 3, Node 1).
SR 303: The I-71/SR 303 interchange is located approximately 2.5 miles south of Boston Road and
serves the communities of Brunswick, Brunswick Hills, and Hinckley. The land use to the west of the
interchange along SR 303 is a mix of commercial and retail. At SR 303, a single ramp exists for the
movements for the I-71 southbound exit to SR 303, the SR 303 entrance to I-71 southbound, and the
I-71 northbound exit to SR 303. In 2016, the exit slip ramp from I-71 southbound to SR 303 westbound
was widened and extended west to allow traffic to clear the exit ramp in a quicker and safer manner.
A pair of ramps facilitate the northbound entrance movement onto I-71. One ramp services the
traffic for westbound SR 303 (Figure 6, SR 303 Node 5) and one ramp services traffic from eastbound
SR 303 onto I-71 northbound (Figure 6, SR 303 Node 4). SR 303 primarily has five lanes west of I-71
and has four lanes east of I-71. SR 303 is as wide as seven lanes just west of the I-71 interchange.
Page 10
IV. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Five Alternatives were analyzed in this Preliminary Feasibility Study to determine what impacts a
proposed interchange at Boston Road and I-71 may have on traffic. A total of eight intersections,
signalized and stop controlled, near the proposed interchange at I-71 were modeled. The
interchange approximately 2.5 miles north of Boston Road, SR 82, is located in Strongsville
(Cuyahoga County). Four signalized intersections, including the freeway ramps, along SR 82 were
evaluated. The interchange approximately 2.5 miles to the south of Boston Road, SR 303, is located
in Brunswick (Medina County). Five signalized intersections, including the freeway ramps, along SR
303 were studied. Figures 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix A show the intersections that were analyzed as
part of this report. The analysis points along I-71 include freeway segments, diverge, and merge
areas. Existing freeway segments and ramps are shown in Figures 4 and 5 Appendix A.
The following figures depict the alternatives considered as part of this study.
Page 11
Figure 3 - No Build/Exiting Conditions Exhibit
Page 12
Figure 4 - Alternative 1 Layout Exhibit
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Figure 8 - Full Interchange Layout Exhibit
Page 17
V. KEY ISSUES
The I-71 and Boston Road corridors, within the Study Area, were assessed for critical issues
related to design criteria, traffic control & safety, utility conflicts, environmental constraints,
and constructability. There will be right-of-way impacts on each Build alternative studied.
Preliminary right-of-way costs have been estimated to assess impacts relative to each
Alternative; however, it is understood that a more refined determination will be developed in
Part 1B. Details of this assessment and issues identified are documented in the Preliminary
Project Initiation Package (PIP), provided in Appendix B.
There are two elements to a holistic solution to traffic redistribution along the I-71 corridor
from SR 82 south to SR 303. The first is consideration of alternatives consisting of configurations
of full and partial interchanges at Boston Road. The second is the impact on Boston Road
including several intersecting roads that will be part of an overall Boston Road widening and
upgrade project. Boston Road should be improved to accept the traffic any interchange will
produce so widening and reconstruction are recommended for each build alternative. NOTE:
Construction cost estimates, right-of-way impacts, environmental impacts, and utility impacts
identified in this report do not include the improvements to Boston Road beyond the limits
shown in the Interchange Layout Exhibits for Alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4, and Full Interchange. Key
Issues are described for each alternative element.
Safety:
Improved safety is directly related to congestion reduction. By reducing congestion throughout
the study area, safety is anticipated to be improved.
Traffic Analysis:
The traffic analysis shows a reduction in delay for the study intersections and a minimal increase
in delay for the freeway facility. Additionally, for the design year three (3) intersections have
a failing level of service (LOS) for the No Build condition but for the build alternatives only one
will fail.
Roadway Design Issues:
Each alternative will require improvements to Boston Road that mitigate an existing deficient
vertical profile, substandard pavement section and ditch grading in the study area.
Maintenance of Traffic:
Maintenance of Traffic during construction for each alternative will require careful planning
and cooperation with stakeholders in the public involvement activities in the future.
Structural Design Issues:
The bridge on Boston Road over I-71 will be impacted by a widened roadway section. It is too
early to estimate the full extent of the work involved but a budget number for each alternative
is included in the Estimated Construction Cost Table 1.
Environmental Analysis:
More research will be required to determine if threatened or endangered species, wetlands or
environmental justice will be impacted when more information is available on work limits and
the footprint of a preferred alternative in future phases of preliminary engineering.
Utility Impacts:
Build condition scenarios will be designed to accommodate existing subsurface utilities present
along Boston Road and the west limited access right of way of I-71. Widening Boston Road will
likely require relocation of aerial power and telecommunication utilities. Widening of Boston
Road for all alternatives studied will require extensive coordination with Buckeye Pipeline that
Page 18
owns the two 12” petroleum pipelines. The pipelines were found to be sub-standard in a study
by the Cuyahoga County Engineer in the early 2000’s. In 2003 Buckeye offered an estimated
cost to relocate 1.7 miles of their pipeline of $2.5 million. The company is not able to provide
an updated cost estimate because the design is not started. The ODOT Office of Estimating
was contacted and provided an escalation factor of 2.2 to bring the relocation cost to $5.5
million dollars in 2023 dollars. See Appendix F for existing utilities present within the I-
71/Boston Road area and the Project Initiation Package in Appendix B.
Estimated Construction Cost:

The following table shows the estimated cost of construction for each alternative. The costs
include construction of new ramps, improvements to Boston Road, Howe Road, North Carpenter
Road and the associated side streets within the limits of improvements shown on the
Interchange Layout Exhibits presented within this report. Costs associated with improvements
to Boston Road beyond the interchange area, intersection improvements outside of the
Boston Road interchange area, and public and private utility relocation (Buckeye Pipeline)
are not included at this feasibility stage.
Table 1 – Estimated Construction and Right-of-Way Cost in $Millions
Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Full

1 2 3 4 Interchange
Construction
$27.4 $36.3 $35.2 $29.0 $44.2
Cost
Right-of-Way $1.2 $6.3 $2.5 $4.9 $6.8
Total of
Construction
$28.6 $42.6 $37.7 $33.9 $51.0
and Right-of-
Way Costs
VI. COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES - TRAFFIC

To compare each alternative to the No Build condition on a larger scale, the delays for all
intersections that were studied were totaled and compared. For each study alternative, the
delay at each intersection was multiplied by the associated peak hour traffic volumes through
the intersection. The result produces a cumulative delay better representing the impact to the
overall roadway network.
The results showed that for each alternative the delay was always improved from the No Build
condition for the sum of the intersections along the SR 82 and SR 303 corridors. Although traffic
will be increased at the Boston Road area intersections, the Build conditions include
improvements such as widening to attain an acceptable level of service. When combining the
delays for AM and PM peak hours for the study intersections, the reduction in delay outweighs
any increase in delay for a net benefit to the entire local network. Table 2 shows the total
delay in hours for each alternative.
Page 19
The delay improvements shown below in Table 2 represent the cumulative time in hours
motorists using these intersections will be improved during the AM and PM peak hour for one
day. This does not include travel time along segments or any origin-destination information.
For some alternatives, motorists will experience almost 100 hours of saved delay compared to
the No Build condition for the two peak hours at the study intersections.
Table 2: Total Delay for Study Area Intersections – Design Year

Intersection Delay (hours)
Condition Delay Improvement
AM Peak PM Peak Total Compared to No
Build
No Build 273.8 473.4 747.2 0
Alt 1 245.2 431.0 676.2 71.0
Alt 2 239.0 417.2 656.1 91.1
Alt 3 245.5 406.0 651.5 95.7
Alt 4 244.5 441.0 685.6 61.6
Full Build 236.1 464.9 701.1 46.1
HCS freeway facility analysis includes a vehicle hours of delay (VHD) output. VHD is the vehicle
hours of delay on the freeway during the peak period analyzed for the length of the study. This
does not include ramp delays. The northbound and southbound VHD were totaled for 2047 and
the results are provided in Table 3. The table also shows the degradation in delay compared to
a No Build condition due to increased traffic volumes on I-71 between SR 82 and SR 303. It
should be noted that the comparison in Table 3 does not include anticipated improvements to
the local road network for the proposed alternatives.
Table 3: Total Delay for Study Area Freeway – Design Year

Vehicle Hours of Delay
Condition Delay Compared to
AM Peak PM Peak Total
No Build
No Build 6.77 5.05 11.82 0
Alt 1 7.15 7.83 14.98 -3.16
Alt 2 8.06 7.83 15.89 -4.07
Alt 3 8.01 7.83 15.84 -4.02
Alt 4 7.43 6.81 14.24 -2.42
Full Build 8.87 8.07 16.94 -5.12
HCS freeway facility analysis provides a measure of ramp performance as density in the ramp
influence area (DRI) of the freeway segment. DRI is the equivalent passenger cars per mile per
lane (pc/mi/ln) traveling within the ramp merge or diverge influence area during the peak
periods analyzed. The ramp performance for each proposed alternative is demonstrated by the
cumulative change in density at the existing interchange ramps. The resulting overall DRI at the
existing SR 82 and SR 303 interchanges was totaled and the results are presented in Table 4.
Page 20
Table 4: Ramp Influence Area Density Comparison – Design Year
Total Ramp Density (pc/mi/ln)
Condition SR 82 (Royalton SR 303 Density Compared
Total
Road) (Center Road) to No Build
No Build 230.4 171.3 401.7 0
Alt 1 239.6 164.8 404.4 -2.7
Alt 2 242.4 149.0 391.4 10.3
Alt 3 242.4 149.0 391.4 10.3
Alt 4 228.6 171.6 400.2 1.5
Full Build 230.8 169.0 399.8 1.9
The analysis performed for this study determined that all proposed Build conditions would
operate at an acceptable level of service for I-71 corridor as well as the study area intersections
with the exception of the SR 82 and Howe intersection. At this location, operations are similar
or improved for each alternative. Boston Road area intersections were analyzed with the
assumption that they would be improved to meet an acceptable level of service while the
remainder of the study locations would not be changed geometrically.
Tables 5 provides a general comparison of performance based on estimated costs, operational

delay, and network density. These indicate the degree of relative success for each alternative.
Freeway delay results show an increase in delay when compared to No Build conditions.
Generally, ramp density and intersection delay improve, to varying degrees, for each
alternative compared to No Build conditions. The benefit of reduction in delay for the
intersections is far more significant than the increase in freeway delay.
Table 5: Design Year Alternative Performance Comparison

Total Delay
Freeway Ramp
for all Studied
Condition Vehicle Hour Density
Intersections
Delay (pc/mi/ln)
(hour)
No Build 747.2 11.82 401.7
Alt 1 676.2 14.98 404.4
Alt 2 656.1 15.89 391.4
Alt 3 651.5 15.84 391.4
Alt 4 685.6 14.24 400.2
Full Build 701.1 16.94 399.8
The analysis for this study determined that no significant adverse impact on the operation of
the Interstate facility or on the local street system will occur for current or design year as a
result of the studied interchange alternatives. All five alternatives are considered feasible
alternatives based on traffic analysis.
Table 6 shows the total change of freeway and intersection delays compared to the No Build
divided by the estimated cost of construction and right-of-way for each alternative. This shows
the reduction in delay per million dollars of construction in the form of a benefit to cost ratio.
This ratio shows the relative cost to produce improved delay.
Page 21
Table 6: Traffic Delay Benefit to Cost Ratio – Design Year
Estimated Cost Freeway Total Benefit to

Intersection
of Construction Reduction Reduction Cost Ratio
Condition Reduction of
and Right of of Delay of Delay (Hour/
Delay (Hour)
Way ($million) (Hour) (Hour) $Million)
No Build $0 - - - -
Alt 1 $28.6 71.0 -3.2 67.8 2.37
Alt 2 $42.6 91.1 -4.1 87.0 2.04
Alt 3 $37.7 95.7 -4.0 91.6 2.43
Alt 4 $33.9 61.6 -2.4 59.2 1.75
Full Build $51.0 46.1 -5.1 41.0 0.80
This comparison shows that Alternatives 1 and 3 produce the largest benefit to cost ratio. Costs
associated with improvements to Boston Road beyond the interchange area, intersection
improvements outside of the Boston Road interchange area, and public and private utility
relocation (Buckeye Pipeline) are not included at this feasibility stage.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
Each alternative provides some benefit over the No Build condition, and all are recommended
to move forward for further analysis and development in Part 1B.
VIII. NEXT STEPS
Continue with Part 1B of required preliminary development that includes Certified Traffic, an
Environmental Field Study, Public Involvement Plan including coordination by Stakeholder
Meeting and Public Meeting, and an Alternative Evaluation Report (AER), to define a Preferred
Alternative. There will then be an Interchange Justification Study for the Preferred
Alternative. Only then can a scope be developed to move forward with construction plans and
obtain funding for improvements to the network of roads in this study area.
Page 22
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS POINTS

Figure 1 – Intersection Analysis Points (I-71/SR-82)
Figure 2 - Intersection Analysis Points (I-71/Boston Rd)

Figure 3 – Intersection Analysis Points (I-71/SR-303)
Figure 4 – Existing Ramp Junction Analysis Points

Figure 5 – Existing Freeway Segment Analysis Points
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY PROJECT INITIATION PACKAGE

Project Initiation Package
Instructions
• The Project Initiation Package is intended to focus on critical issues that can be identified with existing information from
secondary sources and/or identified during a site visit.
• Each specialty area of the Project Initiation Package should be completed by individuals who possess sufficient
experience to enable them to correctly identify and evaluate issues arising from the field review.
• In the Location/Comments field provide information concerning potential impacts that is brief but gives enough detail to
allow an understanding of the issue(s).
• The scope of services document should account for any issues identified in the Project Initiation Package that have the
potential to affect scope, schedule, and budget.
• In some instances, resources/subject areas that may need to be consulted for the secondary source review are
identified on this form.
Project Initiation Package Deliverables

Provide an expanded Study Area Map identifying project design, utility, right of way and environmental constraints
identified through the Project Initiation Package. Tables, USGS and/or aerial mapping, photographs keyed to
available project mapping, the plan to inform and involve the public, and other support material should also be
submitted with the Project Initiation Package to illustrate specific problem areas.
General
Date(s) of field review: 3/7/2023
Project Name (County, Route, Section): CUY/MED-Traffic Study PID: 116069

Date Project Initiation Package Completed: April 2023 Prepared By: Euthenics, Inc.
ODOT Project
City, Township or Village Name(s): Strongsville; Brunswick Keri J. Welch
Manager:
Project Description: Conduct a traffic study for the roads and highways in Strongsville and Brunswick. The traffic study will
examine how to improve those highways in ways that increase the mobility and convenience of the traveling public through
those municipal corporations. Planning activities include preliminary Purpose & Need Statement and a feasibility study for
No Build, Full Interchange Alternatives, or Partial Interchange Alternatives.
Project Limits/Study Area/General Location: Study Limits: CUY-I.R. 71 SLM 0.00 to 1.018, MED-I.R. 71 SLM 25.645 to
26.687. Study Area: The study area will include SR 82 (Royalton Road) from Howe Road to West 130th Street; Boston Road
from US 42 (Pearl Road) to West 130th Street; & SR 303 (Center Road) from North Carpenter Road to West 130th Street.
Minor intersections throughout the project area will not be studied.
ODOT DISCIPLINE INVOLVEMENT:

List name and phone number of individual(s) representing each discipline during the site visit and preparation of the
Project Initiation Package. One individual may represent multiple disciplines.
DISCIPLINE NAME PHONE NUMBER
District Highway Management
representative
District Planning and Engineering
representative
District Environmental Coordinator
District Construction Representative
February 2022 Page 1 of 17

EXTERNAL AGENCY INVOLVEMENT:

Indicate external agency involvement during identification of project issues affecting scope development. List the name
and phone number of individual(s) representing each agency during the site visit.
AGENCY NAME PHONE NUMBER
FHWA Engineer***
Other (LPA, MPO, etc.)
*** The FHWA Engineer should be invited on projects expected to require approval from Federal Highway
Administration.
GENERAL EXISTING INFORMATION:

Legal Speed: 60 (CUY I.R. 71) | 65 (MED-I.R. 71) | 35 (Boston Road)
Design Speed: 65 (CUY I.R. 71) | 70 (MED-I.R. 71) |35 (Boston Road)
Opening Year ADT: 58280 (MED-I.R. 71) | 8850 (Boston Road)
Design Year ADT: 61290 (MED-I.R. 71) | 9450 (Boston Road)
Trucks (24 Hour B&C): 6% (I.R. 71) | 2% (Boston Road)
Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Interstate (I.R. 71) | Major Collector (Boston Road)
Locale (Rural or Urban): Urban
National Highway System (NHS): NHS (I.R. 71) | non-NHS (Boston Road)
LOCAL PLANNING COORDINATION:

Briefly describe local planning studies, bike/ped long range plans, aesthetics, etc. that will be considered throughout
project development:
2020 GPD Boston Road Interchange Study CUY/MED – 71 (PID 107789)
2019 Strongsville Master Plan
2018 NOACA IR-71 Corridor Study - Boston Road Partial Interchange Origin-Destination Analysis
2017 NOACA IR-71 Corridor Study - Boston Road Partial Interchange
2017 NOACA IR-71 Corridor Study - Northern and Southern Alternative Analysis
2015 Mott-MacDonald I-71 at SR 82 Interchange Justification Study - Shermer Road
DISTRICT HIGHWAY MANAGEMENT STAFF CONCERNS:

List any comments/requests from the District Highway Management Staff.

CRASH DATA:
Has a Safety Study been completed in the project area within past three years Not aware of one.
Is the project area highlighted on the Safety Integrated Project Maps Yes
Based on a spatial query (using GCAT or TIMS) of the three most recent years of crash data, briefly summarize crash
history including pedestrian and bicycle crashes. Indicate any design features that may be contributing to the observed
crash pattern that may be addressed by the project.
Crash data analysis and evaluation of suitable counter measures is to be completed as part of the next phase of the subject
Project. Preliminary assessment of rear end crashes as the predominant crash type is indicative of congestion-related issues
at both S.R. 82 and S.R. 303 interchanges.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Make a preliminary determination on whether the following resources will be affected by the proposed project. Include
the location and any other pertinent information for resources that may be affected.
Resource/Feature Location/Comments
Parkland, nature preserves and wildlife areas {4(f)/6(f)} No
Threatened and Endangered Species and/or habitat To be determined; wooded area present north of Boston Road,
west of IR71
Scenic River No
Existing wet areas /existing cattails/wetlands To be determined; 2 NWI areas north of Boston, E&W of I.R. 71
Stream/river/waterway/jurisdictional ditch Unnamed tributary to Rocky River East Branch
Historic Resources (buildings, structures, objects) To be determined
Historic Bridge(s) No
National Historic Landmarks No
Archaeological Sites No
Public Facilities No
Cemetery (modern and historic cemeteries) No
Farmland No
Watershed Specific (i.e. Darby or Olentangy) NPDES General Permit
Permit Area
Air Quality non-attainment area or concerns The project site is located within Non-Attainment areas for PM 2.5
and Ozone 8-hour.
Landfill, Superfund, CERCLIS, RCRA, NPL, or industrial To be determined
site(s), and/or evidence of hazardous materials
Sensitive environmental justice areas No
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) None within in anticipated project area
floodplains
Lake Erie Coastal Management Area No
Sole Source Aquifers No
Wellhead Protection Areas No
Noise abatement issues To be determined (exist noise barrier MED-71-26.67)
Coordination with Conservancy Districts No
Other environmental issues None known at this time

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CONTROLLING CRITERIA:

Consider design speed, design functional classification, land use, and available traffic data to make a preliminary
determination as to the geometric standards for the project and potential for design exceptions. Note exceptions for low
volume roadways.
Design Criteria Location/Comments
Lane Width 11-ft req (Boston);12-ft req (IR71)
Shoulder Width 4-ft req (Boston); 10-ft req (IR71)
Horizontal Curve Radius Not applicable (tangent)
Maximum Grade Gmax=10% (Boston); Gmax=3%(IR71)
Stopping Sight Distance (Horizontal and Crest SSDreq=305 (Boston)
Vertical Curves)
Superelevation Rate Not applicable (tangent)
Vertical Clearance N/A
Pavement Cross Slope New pavement cross-slope to conform to L&D Vol. 2 requirements
Design Loading Structural Capacity New pavement to comply with ODOT Pavement Design Manual
OTHER GEOMETRIC DESIGN ISSUES:

Indicate if the following geometric issues are present or should be considered during project development. Consider work
on the mainline as well as any side roads or service roads. Provide additional comments as needed.
Design Issues Location/Comments
Does the horizontal alignment have an excessive N&A - tangent
deflection?
Do the Intersection Angles or Crossroad Alignment Yes; they appear to
meet design standards?
Do the Intersection Angles or Crossroad Alignment (duplication)
meet design standards?
Is driver comfort an issue due to the vertical No
curvature or breaks in the grade?
Does the shoulder width on a structure allow for a Yes; (existing);
minimum width of 4’ from the edge of the traveled
way to the face of any barrier? New structure to comply with L&D Vol. 1 & BDM
Has a minimum width of 4’ from the edge of the Yes
traveled way to the face of any barrier?
Does intersection sight distance need to be ISD (35mph)=390 not available along Boston at N. Carpenter or
improved?
Benbow
List unprotected hazards that appear to be in the
None observed
clear zone.
Should existing access control be revised to improve Not an issue for existing; to be determined for build conditions
safety?
Are there any drive locations that will require special To be determined once a preferred alternative is selected.
attention during design (e.g., very steep grades, high
volume commercial drives, drives close to bridges or Build conditions may require widening of Boston Road which may
intersections)? affect drives/access
Do the existing intersection radius returns need to be
No
modified to improve pedestrian crossing safety?
Do the existing intersection radius returns need to be To be determined, currently no trucks permitted eastbound at the
modified or truck aprons added to accommodate
U.S.42/Boston Road intersection
turning movements of large trucks?

OTHER GEOMETRIC DESIGN ISSUES:

Indicate if the following geometric issues are present or should be considered during project development. Consider work
on the mainline as well as any side roads or service roads. Provide additional comments as needed.
Does grading need to be upgraded? To what criteria
Safety grading recommended for improvements along I-71. Clear
(e.g., clear zone, safety, standard)? Consider
zone or standard grading along Boston Road.
potential right of way and other impacts when
considering grading method.
Are new or updated curb ramps needed? Refer to Yes; at Benbow Road. Pedestrian facilities not present elsewhere.
the Curb Ramp Measuring Guide
If constructing a new roadway, will it be a connection N/A
between two existing NHS Routes?
If traffic control at an intersection is being changed N/A
from stop control to signalization, does the profile of
the stop condition road need to be upgraded to
accommodate faster traffic?
Are there any other geometric issues? Describe.
Geometric issues are not anticipated within the immediate
interchange area at Boston Road. There is a steep roadway grade
on Boston close to the U.S.42 intersection. Steep roadway ditch
fore-slopes exist along the Boston Road corridor beyond the limits
of the proposed interchange.

GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES:
Based on the information compiled during this study indicate whether or not the following geotechnical issues are
present or should be further considered during project development. Provide additional comments as needed. Refer to
Section 302.2 of the ODOT Specifications for Geotechnical Explorations for literature search resources.
Is there evidence of soil drainage problems (e.g., wet -
or pumping subgrade, standing water, the presence
of seeps, wetlands, swamps, bogs)?
Will construction be impacted based on the -
groundwater table?
Is there evidence of any embankment or foundation -
problems (e.g., differential settlement, sag,
foundation failures, slope failures, scours, evidence
of channel migrations)?
Is there evidence of any slope instability (soil or -
rock)?
Is there evidence of unsuitable materials (e.g., -
presence of debris or man-made fills or waste pits
containing these materials, indications from old soil
borings)?
Is there evidence of rock strata (e.g., presence of -
exposed bedrock, rock on the old borings)?
Is there evidence of active, reclaimed or abandoned -
surface mines? Evidence of quarries?
Is there information pertaining to the existence of -
underground mines?
Is there Acid Mine Drainage present within the study -
area?
Are there any other geotechnical issues? Specify. Future design project would include Geotech investigation.
PAVEMENT ISSUES:
Indicate if the following pavement issues are present or should be considered during project development. Side road and
service road work should be considered in this assessment. Provide additional comments as needed.
Design Issue Location/Comments
Do dynaflect tests indicate the existing pavement is Not applicable
in poor condition?
Are joint repairs needed? N/A – typically existing asphalt pavement
Are pressure relief joints needed? N/A – existing pavement is full depth asphalt
Does curb need to be replaced due to deteriorated N/A
condition or lack of curb reveal?
Has the site received repeated resurfacings in recent Boston Road is resurfaced on a regular basis.
years?
Does pavement deterioration appear to be caused by No
drainage or geotechnical problems?
Are there any other pavement issues? Specify. No; PCR=67 (Boston (20)) | PCR=83 (IR71 (22))

STRUCTURAL ISSUES:
Indicate if the following structure issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide
additional comments as needed. The Bridge Inspection reports should be evaluated and attached. Provide a separate
table for each structure.
Structure Number: 1803549 (CUY-71-0.000)
Is it possible for the structure to be replaced with a N/A
prefabricated box culvert or 3-sided box?
Is the deck delaminated? Specify. No
Is non-destructive testing needed to determine the Not applicable
Amount of delamination?
Are there areas to be patched/repaired on the deck? N/A – Anticipate full replacement
Is the bridge a poor candidate for an overlay? Specify N/A – Anticipate full replacement
type of overlay if known.
Does the bridge rail violate current standards? No
Is fatigue analysis required? Not applicable
Should all fatigue prone details be retrofitted or Not applicable
replaced? Specify.
Is there any evidence of substructure movement No
(e.g., settlement, rotation)?
Is elimination of the deck joint possible? What Not applicable
modifications are necessary?
Is it possible for the hinges to be removed to make Not applicable
the members continuous?
Is there any evidence that the bridge does not meet Not applicable
hydraulic capacity?
Are there existing sidewalks on or adjacent to the Yes; walk are on structure, only
bridge?
Is Vandal Protection Fencing required in accordance Existing vandal protection fence
with the BDM?
Will the structure work require any special Part width construction is anticipated. Short term night closure is
maintenance of traffic (e.g., closing of roadway for likely to set new bridge beams.
erection of beams, maintenance of waterway traffic,
location of cut line, etc.)? Specify.
Does the bridge need to accommodate future To be determined
roadway lanes, bicycle lanes, a shared use path,
shoulder, or railroad tracks?
Will temporary shoring be required next to the Likely for MOT.
railroad?
Describe any issues with the bridge deck (curb, No
sidewalk, railing, surface, median, drainage,
expansion joints, etc.).
Describe any issues with the bridge superstructure Not known
(alignment, beams/girders/slab, bearing devices,
etc.).
Describe any issues with the bridge substructure Not known
(abutments, piers, backwalls, wingwalls, scour, etc.).
Describe any issues with the channel (i.e. alignment, Not applicable
erosion, etc.)
Describe any issues with the bridge approaches (i.e. None known
pavement, guardrail, etc.)
Are there any other structure related issues? Specify. None known

HYDRAULIC ISSUES:
Indicate if the following drainage issues are present or should be considered during project development. Side road and
service road work should be considered in this assessment. Any available Culvert Inspection reports should be evaluated
and attached. Provide additional comments as needed.
Design Issue Comments
Does the existing drainage system appear to be Yes
appropriately sized and functioning properly?
Describe deficiencies.
Is there evidence of alignment or flow velocity No
problems (e.g., scour, bank erosions, silting) at
culvert inlets or outlets?
Are there sinkholes or other deterioration in the No
pavement that would indicate separations in the
existing pipes?
Is the exposed curb height in existing gutters No
inadequate to contain flow (include height of
proposed resurfacing)?
Does the project affect a wetland or waterway (e.g., To be determined
stream, river, jurisdictional ditch)?
Will channel relocation be required? To be determined
Will post construction BMPs be required that could To be determined
impact R/W or utilities?
Are existing underdrain outlets functioning properly? Existing underdrains appear to be functioning.
Does the drainage work warrant any special Improvements are not to result in an increase in runoff versus the
maintenance of traffic considerations? existing conditions.
Are there any other hydraulic issues? Describe. 60” culvert under IR71 north of Boston Road (CFN1817065) will
likely need to be replaced or extended.

TSMO CONSIDERATIONS:
Briefly describe the opportunities for managing congestion or traffic issues using TSMO strategies or improvements.
Consider opportunities to upgrade or install systems management and operations infrastructure:
TSMO infrastructure includes communications equipment, travel time signs, signals, changeable message signs, traffic
cameras, traffic signal systems, other remote field devices and data collection equipment, conduit and any supporting fiber
optics. TOAST is the Traffic Operations Assessment System Tool For additional TSMO information see
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Operations/Traffic/miscellaneous/Pages/TSMO.aspx
Does the project area contain a Hot Spot identified in 2022 score = 73.3% (IR71)
TOAST? If so, what is the TOAST ranking?
Does the project area have an operations master No
plan (or has this site been discussed with the District
TSMO Coordinator)?
Would operations benefit from TMC coverage of the No
project area? (RWIS, travel time boards, cameras,
communications)
Are there opportunities for initiating or upgrading No
TSMO infrastructure?
Does this project support any TSMO strategies such To be determined
as (Smartlane, VSL, Coordinated traffic signals, etc.)
Does this project require multi-jurisdictional Yes. Project resides on municipal, county, and ODOT District
coordination, agreements, funding, etc.? boundary.
What existing TSMO infrastructure is in place? Will it Not applicable
need to be moved or maintained in place?
Are there any local TSMO infrastructure No
recommendations in the project area? (ex. Include
emergency or transit traffic signal pre-emption,
dynamic message signs or signal coordination)
What MPO ITS architecture is already in place or None
planned? Consult the MPO ITS architecture plan, if
applicable.
Categories of potential ITS for this study area/project Not applicable
include: Exempt, Low, or High risk? Ref: TEM, 1-
pager for CFR 940.
Could this project expand an existing device or No
communications system?
What type of device communications and equipment Not applicable
exists?
Should this location have communications added or No
upgraded?
Will additional conduit be necessary for future No
infrastructure/communications? (ex. in barrier wall)
Will existing device power or communications drops No
be disrupted?
Does this project require a new traffic signal timing Yes
plan?
Are the current traffic signal(s) being upgraded to a Likely, to be determined
system?
Are there alternative routes available/identified for Yes
incident management?
Is this a Traffic Incident Management Note eligible Yes (multi-year interstate project)
project?
OTHER TSMO Considerations:

TRAFFIC CONTROL ISSUES:

Indicate if the following traffic control (signals, signing, pavement markings, etc.) issues are present or should be
considered during project development. Provide additional comments as needed.
Design Issue Comments
Are there any obvious deviations from requirements No
of the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (OMUTCD)?
Will coordination with Ohio Rail Development Not applicable
Commission (ORDC) be required (i.e. at-grade
railroad crossings located within 400' of an
intersection within the project area)?
Will pavement widening affect pole locations? Yes
Will resurfacing affect signal height? Not applicable
Does it appear that any traffic control items will fall No
outside the existing right of way limits (e.g., large
signs, strain poles)?
Are there any crashes that can be related to existing None identified
signal deficiencies (e.g., timing, lack of protected turn
phase)?
Do pedestrian signals and push buttons need to be No (existing); yes if pedestrian facilities expanded in future build
installed or upgraded? conditions
Do turn lane lengths appear to have sufficient Yes
storage capacity?
Does the controller need to be upgraded? Not applicable
Do proprietary materials need to be specified? No
Should signs or signal installations be supplemented Likely within interchange area
with lighting?
Are any Tourist Oriented Directional Signs (TODS) or Not applicable
LOGO signs present?
Are there any other traffic control issues? Specify. None known
UTILITY ISSUES:
Indicate if the following utility issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide additional
comments as needed.
Do existing utilities need to be relocated? If so, 12” Buckeye Pipeline along south side of Boston Road;
please identify. underground crossing IR71 south of Boston.
Sanitary sewer along north and south sides of Boston Road;
underground crossing IR71 south of Boston.
Existing aerial electric (First Energy) and telcomm along north side
of Boston Road.
Sanitary pump station at SE quad at North Carpenter Road
AT&T underground fiber along west side of IR71
Utility relocation to be determined with the preferred alternative
Would the project benefit from Subsurface Utility Yes, during the PE Phase
Engineering (SUE) Level A?
Are there existing utilities on an existing structure None known
that need to be relocated?

UTILITY ISSUES:
Indicate if the following utility issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide additional
comments as needed.
Are there any specific utility requirements or Yes, Buckeye Pipeline is within their own easement outside of the
concerns? Specify. public right-of-way. Impacts to their facilities should be avoided, if
possible.
Are there water or sanitary lines that will be To be determined, both water and sanitary are present along
relocated as part of the ODOT contract? Boston Road.
Are there any other utility issues? Specify. Impacts to the existing pump station at the southwest quadrant of
Boston Road and I-71 should be avoided, if possible.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ISSUES:

Indicate if the following pedestrian and bicycle facilities are present or should be considered for implementation during
project development.
• Pedestrian facilities: sidewalks, shared use paths, enhanced crossings, signs/signals, and lighting.
• Bicycle facilities: bike lanes, improved shoulders, shared use paths, crossing treatments, signs/signals, and lighting.
Provide additional comments as needed. For additional Bicycle and Pedestrian data, see the TIMS Active Transportation
Map Viewer: https://gis.dot.state.oh.us/tims/Map/ActiveTransportation and discuss with the District Bike & Ped
Contact.
Are there visible signs of deterioration on sidewalks or No sidewalk present between North Carpenter Road Benbow
missing sidewalks? Road
Is there a minimum 4’ clearance along sidewalks? (i.e. Not applicable
poles that obstruct the sidewalk)
Are there visible signs of deterioration in bike Not applicable
lanes/shoulders or missing bike facilities?
Do crossings for bicyclists and/or pedestrians need to be Yes
improved or installed?
Is on-street parking set back 20 feet from the crosswalk Not applicable
(both marked and unmarked) at an intersection or set back
30 feet of the approach to any flashing beacon, stop sign
or traffic control device? (See TEM 4511.68)
Is there evidence of the need for a midblock crossing? (i.e. None known.
pedestrian crashes, signalized intersection spacing exceeds
600 ft., presence of midblock transit stops or path,
pedestrian generators and destinations). Refer to FHWA
Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled
Intersections
Does the project area have an active transportation plan in No
place (or other multimodal plan such as a bicycle,
pedestrian, school travel plan, or metropolitan
transportation plan). Contact pertinent local public
agencies for more information.
Is there existing bicycle or pedestrian usage along this No
corridor? (For statewide volume data visit ODOT’s Non-
Motorized Database System)
Visible indicators of usage include counts, worn paths,
transit stops, etc.

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ISSUES:

Indicate if the following pedestrian and bicycle facilities are present or should be considered for implementation during
project development.
• Pedestrian facilities: sidewalks, shared use paths, enhanced crossings, signs/signals, and lighting.
• Bicycle facilities: bike lanes, improved shoulders, shared use paths, crossing treatments, signs/signals, and lighting.
Provide additional comments as needed. For additional Bicycle and Pedestrian data, see the TIMS Active Transportation
Map Viewer: https://gis.dot.state.oh.us/tims/Map/ActiveTransportation and discuss with the District Bike & Ped
Contact.
Are there visible signs of deterioration on sidewalks or No sidewalk present between North Carpenter Road Benbow
missing sidewalks? Road
Is there a minimum 4’ clearance along sidewalks? (i.e. Not applicable
poles that obstruct the sidewalk)
Are there visible signs of deterioration in bike Not applicable
lanes/shoulders or missing bike facilities?
Do crossings for bicyclists and/or pedestrians need to be Yes
improved or installed?
Is on-street parking set back 20 feet from the crosswalk Not applicable
(both marked and unmarked) at an intersection or set back
30 feet of the approach to any flashing beacon, stop sign
or traffic control device? (See TEM 4511.68)
Is there evidence of the need for a midblock crossing? (i.e. None known.
pedestrian crashes, signalized intersection spacing exceeds
600 ft., presence of midblock transit stops or path,
pedestrian generators and destinations). Refer to FHWA
Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled
Intersections
Does the project area have an active transportation plan in No
place (or other multimodal plan such as a bicycle,
pedestrian, school travel plan, or metropolitan
transportation plan). Contact pertinent local public
agencies for more information.
Is the project located on a designated or proposed bike No
route (local, regional, state, or US)?
What is the Level of Traffic Stress (1-4)? (LTS 1 and 2 are LTS=3 (shared lane)
considered comfortable for the mainstream adult
population.) (See Level of Traffic Stress calculation tool.
This data is pre-calculated for the State & US Bike Route
System).
Does the project area have high Active Transportation Yes;
Demand and high Active Transportation Need (Scores of 3 AT Demand = Low (Cuyahoga)
or 4)? AT Demand = Moderate (Medina)
(Use the Identify Features tool to select project area and AT Need = 3 (High)
view scores for Demand_ Mapping and Need_Mapping.
scores.)
What are the proposed bicycle lane widths? Not applicable
What are the proposed sidewalk and shared use path To be determined based on build condition; 5-ft width w/ 4-ft
widths (and buffer width)? min. buffer anticipated
If bike/ped accommodations require additional ROW not Yes
planned for the project, can a future project provide this?

MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC ISSUES:

Indicate if the following maintenance of traffic issues are present or should be considered during project development.
Provide additional comments as needed.
Are there bridge load limits within the work limits or None known.
in the nearby area that would limit the available
signed official detour or unsigned local alternate
routes?
Is the project located on the National Truck Yes
Network?
Are there overhead bridges with existing vertical No
clearance issues or that may become vertical
clearance issues (e.g. shifting traffic to the shoulder,
adding pavement without milling first, etc.)
Are there pinch points within the work area that that Boston Road overpass bridge SFN1803549
would prevent the installation of temporary 60-in culvert under IR71, 280-ft north of Boston CFN1817065
pavement for maintaining the existing number of 24-in culvert under IR71, south of Boston Road CFN1850629
lanes? If yes, identify the location and type of width Pinch points to be determined.
restraints. (e.g., median wall, at grade bridge,
overhead bridge piers, trees, historic markers, etc.)
Are there visible signs of pavement condition No
deterioration in the driving lanes? On the shoulders?
If yes, identify location and estimated degree of
deterioration and if further testing is needed.
Are there nearby schools that may be adversely No schools within anticipated project limits.
impacted by the proposed work? If yes, identify Schools within 2mi: Chapman Elementary; Primrose (Strongsville);
names, location and school districts. Memorial Elementary; Kidder Elementary; Crestview Elementary
(Brunswick)
Are there nearby emergency services (e.g., hospital, No emergency services within anticipated project limits.
fire, police, EMS, etc.) that may be adversely Strongsville Fire Sta. 2, 1-mi north on Howe Rd.
impacted by the proposed work? If yes, identify Brunswick Fire, 1-mi south on N. Carpenter Rd.
locations and names.
Are there significant traffic generators nearby that Not anticipated
may be adversely impacted by the proposed work?
(e.g., industries, factories, sports arenas, etc.)
What is the width of the existing pavement? Will Yes; Ex. pav’t width = 36-ft (Boston Rd.)
temporary pavement be needed to maintain the
existing number of travel lanes?
What geometric features exist within the work area Howe Rd., N. Carpenter Rd., & Benbow Rd. intersections within
and within the area of influence of the work area work area.
that may impact sight distances and/or flow of Crest on subject bridge with ~4% approach grades.
traffic? (e.g., horizontal/vertical curves, blind
driveways, intersections, entrance/exit ramps,
railroad crossings, etc.)
Are there sidewalks or paths within or leading Yes
to/from the work area that need to be closed?
If sidewalk/path needs to be closed, can users be Yes
detoured on the existing sidewalk system or will a
temporary pedestrian and/or bicycle pathway need
to be included in the plan?
Are transit stops present within the work area? No


Are there culverts within the work area that may No
need to be lengthened to accommodate temporary
widening? If so, identify locations and culvert
numbers.
Are there any known existing drainage issues within Roadside ditches, drive pipes, and ditch inlets present along both
the work limits? If yes, special attention needs to be sides of Boston Rd. east of IR71 and south side of Boston west of
given to ensuring temporary drainage can be bridge. Catch basins at both bridge approaches. Culverts under
accomplished. both bridge approaches.
Will personal and/or business driveways be adversely To be determined.
impacted or need to be closed for any amount of
time?
Is the project located in or nearby an area of regional Brunswick and Hinckley have offered statements in opposition.
significance with a potential to cause controversy or
negative public feedback or political scrutiny?
Is there enough width to provide safe construction Temporary pavement will likely be required for safe access.
access? If no, what other means of access can be
provided?
Is there potential for the need to require right-of- Yes
way acquisition?
Is there room in the median for the construction of Crossovers are not anticipated for improvements along I-71.
crossover pavement within the project limits and
beyond the project limits on either end? If yes,
identify potential locations for crossover locations.
Are short duration road closures going to be Possibly
required? (e.g., bridge demo, steel erection,
overhead utility installation/removal, etc.). If yes, is
there an opportunity for diversion of the traffic to
other routes or to the ramps on a diamond
interchange? Identify the potential diversion routes.
Will there be a need for temporary structures (full or Not anticipated
partial) in order to maintain the existing number of
lanes?
Is there power available within or nearby the project Yes
location for temporary lighting and/or temporary
signals?
Will there be a need for additional signal heads Yes
(drives and/or side roads) or temporary signal
timing/coordination?
Are there any Traffic Incident Management features, Yes; IR71 median crossover 600ft south of Boston Rd.
such as hydrants, pull-offs, turn-arounds, etc.?
Are there issues that may limit the construction Wooded habitat
timeframe? (e.g., sporting or other significant
regional events, work in streams, suitable wooded
habitat, school, etc.). If yes, list them.
Would this project potentially benefit from the No
application of innovative contracting method (e.g.,
A+B to open bridge to traffic before school starts,
etc.)? If yes, which method?
Will there be a need to restrict existing movements To be Determined
during construction? (e.g., no left turns, etc.)


Is there an opportunity (or potential need) to No
implement any work zone ITS components? (e.g.,
work zone egress warning, queue detection and
warning, CCTV, DDMS, etc.)
How big of an impact will the project have on queue To be determined by MOTAA
lengths and congestion? If significant, a MOTEC or
PIAC exception may be required per Traffic
Management In Work Zones policy (21-008(P)).
Does this project require an MOTAA? All Path 4 & 5 Based on project path, an MOTAA is likely to be needed.
projects along with Path 3 projects on
Interstate/Interstate look-alikes need to have a
Maintenance of Traffic Alternatives Analysis
Completed.
RIGHT OF WAY/SURVEY ISSUES:

Indicate if right of way or survey issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide
additional comments as needed.
Will there be any work beyond the existing right of Yes
way limits?
Will relocation of residences be involved? Yes based on build alternative
Will relocation of businesses be involved? No
Will the project require modifying the access control Yes based on build alternative
to any properties?
Identify significant right of way encroachments (i.e. No encroachments identified based on cursory review of Boston
large commercial business signs, etc.)? Road / I-71 area.
Will temporary parcels be needed (e.g., for drive Yes
work)?
Will additional right of way be needed for utility To be determined
relocations?
Are there any specific property owner concerns? If Not known
so, list property owners and concerns.
Are work agreements prohibited for any reason? No
Are there any other right of way or survey issues? Not known
Specify.
AGENCY COORDINATION/PERMIT ISSUES:

Indicate if the following permit issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide
Issue Location/Comments
Will an Individual US Army Corps of Engineers/ To be determined
Environmental Protection Agency 404/401 permit be
required?

AGENCY COORDINATION/PERMIT ISSUES:

Indicate if the following permit issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide
Will a Section 408 Permission by the USACE be No
required for work within an USACE Civil Works
project? Refer to the National Levee Database
(army.mil); National Inventory of Dams (army.mil);
Louisville District (arcgis.com) Consult with OES
during planning to discuss Section 408 coordination
Will a Coast Guard permit be required? No
Is review by a local public agency or project sponsor Yes; City

required? Specify.
Is State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) No
coordination for work involving historic bridges or
historic properties required?
Is coordination with ODNR for work involving State No
Scenic Rivers, State Wildlife Areas or State
Recreational Areas required?
Is coordination with any other agency required? To be determined
CONSTRUCTION ISSUES:
Indicate if the following issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide additional
comments as needed.
Will any of the construction activity take place over, No
under, or near railroad property?
Could material with long lead times for delivery have Possibly
an impact on the construction schedule and/or
project completion (e.g., strain poles, large box
culverts, steel beams, etc.)?
Are there any concerns related to existing or No
proposed lighting (e.g., light trespass, river
navigation, airway clearance)?
Compare the Begin/End construction dates with the To be determined
Scope of Work. Is the construction schedule
reasonable?
Examine the existing pavement condition and repair IR71 PCR = 84 (2021); no substantial repair anticipated
history. Calculate potential pavement repair Boston Rd PCR=67 (2021); Cuyahoga side of Boston resurfaced in
quantities. 2022. New pavement anticipated.
Note manhole lid elevations versus proposed paving To be determined
thickness. Will manhole lids or valve boxes need
adjusted after paving?
Is there a need for Echelon Paving? No
Examine the rideability of the approach slab to the No issues identified
roadway/bridge joint.
Will the project have impacts to nearby Yes, adjacent residential properties impacted.
residents/businesses? Will site access occur down
steep side slopes or through properties adjacent to
project site?

CONSTRUCTION ISSUES:
Indicate if the following issues are present or should be considered during project development. Provide additional
comments as needed.
Examine existing guardrail condition, height and Guardrail condition is fair; anticipate replacement as part of
length of need. What is the condition of the slopes project.
behind guardrail? Will additional grading or fill be Slopes appear stable. Need for additional grading or fill for
required for guardrail replacement? guardrail not anticipated.
Is more space or room needed for construction? To be determined.
Is Temporary or Permanent R/W required for utility
relocations, construction of structures, drainage
ditches, etc.?
Is there enough clearance to overhead utility lines for Aerial utility relocations required.
cranes and concrete pump trucks?
Will there be instream work? Not anticipated
Will Temporary shoring/sheeting, cofferdams or No

work pads be required to complete the proposed
work? Anticipated Permitting (see Agency
Coordination/Permit Issues section above)
Will the road need to be detoured to complete To be determined by MOTAA.
construction? What are the possible detour routes?
Where are the potential staging areas for the Within properties vacated for project.
contractor?
SCOPE, SCHEDULE AND BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:

Based on the responses to the above items, do any of the following need to be modified?
Issue Comments
Conceptual scope No
Work limits Work limits to be determined
Probable environmental document type To be determined
Project Path classification To be determined
Schedule Schedule not determined
Budget To be determined

APPENDIX C
SAFETY PRIORITIES
SAFETY PRIORITIES
House Bill (HB) 110, effective June 30, 2021, intends to increase the safety (reduce congestion)
and convenience of the traveling public through the cities of Strongsville, North Royalton, and
Brunswick by funding a portion of the cost of this study. Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) Priority Intersections and Segments have been identified along SR 82 near the I-71
interchange and on Pearl Road (US 42) in the City of Strongsville. An additional HSIP Priority
Segment has been identified on SR 303 in the City of Brunswick. County Engineers Association
of Ohio (CEAO) Priority Segments have also been identified in the surrounding area along W
130th Street and N Carpenter Road.
Figure 8 – Nearby HSIP/SIP Priority Locations (Source: ODOT’s Safety Map Viewer)
Crash data from ODOT’s TIMS and GCAT database (2019-2021) for the study area (the Royalton
Road (SR 82) and Center Road (SR 303) interchanges at I-71, along with Pearl Road (US 42),
Howe Road/N. Carpenter Road, and W. 130th Street) shows a higher concentration of crashes
occurring around the two I-71 interchanges compared to the rest of the road networks. The
predominant crash type observed throughout the corridor was rear end, which can be attributed
to congested conditions with stop and go or queued traffic.
Figure 9 – Crash Locations (2019-2021) (Source: ODOT’s GCAT Tool)
APPENDIX D
CRASH ANALYSIS
CRASH ANALYSIS
The previous three years (2019-2021) of crash history were acquired through the ODOT TIMS
and GCAT database within the study area, with focus on the I-71 interchanges with SR 303 and
SR 82, as well as the following north-south corridors from SR 303 to SR 82:
• US 42/Pearl Road
• W 130th
• Howe Road and North Carpenter Road
At the I-71 interchanges, the crash history review was limited to the east-west streets, the exit
and entrance ramps, and the area immediately surrounding the merge and diverge locations.
Overall, nine hundred sixty-one (961) crashes were recorded in these areas during this time
period. Two (2) of the crashes were fatalities, two hundred fifty-one (251) were injury/possible
injury crashes, and the remainder were property damage only (PDO) crashes. Seven (7) crashes
involved pedestrians or cyclists. A heat map of the study area provided in Appendix B shows the
locations with the highest concentrations of crashes within the study area. This is concentrated
heavily around the I-71 interchanges and the major intersections along SR 303 and particularly
along SR 82.
The majority of the recorded crashes were rear-end crashes (454 crashes), followed by angle
crashes (140 crashes) and side-swipe crashes (118 crashes). The remaining crash types did not
individually represent a significant portion of the crashes, but included the following:
• Left Turn – 79 crashes

• Fixed Object – 64 crashes
• Right Turn – 55 crashes
• Head On – 13 crashes
• Backing – 11 crashes
• Other or Unknown – 15 crashes
• Parked Vehicle – 5 crashes
There were no specific, localized, crash patterns noted for any one location within these areas,
but the dominant recorded crash types generally indicate general congestion for these
locations, particularly along the east-west corridors of SR 303 and SR 82.
The crash history was examined year to year, and the data show that Pearl Road and W 130th
experienced a spike in crashes in 2020, while the I-71 interchanges and the Howe Road/North
Carpenter Road corridor showed a dip in crashes in 2020. These patterns equalized over the
entire study area to result in a steady decrease over time in the overall number of crashes,
with 350 crashes occurring in 2019, 319 crashes occurring in 2020, and 292 crashes occurring in
2021. The reduction in overall crashes in 2020 is presumed to be at least partly due to the
changes in travel volumes and patterns state-wide during the COVID pandemic.
W
Webster Rd
Fa
Pr ie m
ir
R
Boston Roadd
Alb i on R d
Crash Data (2019-2021) 42
Ab be y R d
±
Rd
CrashA lDensity A lbion
bi o n R d
Pear l Rd
Sparse
80 W
Dense
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 4,000

Westwood Dr Feet 42
82
Strongsville
82
Mill Stream Run

Reservation
Brecksville
Lunn Rd Reservation
Howe Rd
Prospec t R d
tR
d
n et
B en
Drake Rd
Drake Rd
H
un
t
Rd
Bennetts
42
71 Corners
Bosto n Rd
Dr
J u d it a
Pine Hills Golf

Club
Graf ton R d 17 Mattin
42
Sto n y Hi l l R d
Hadcock Rd
Babc oc k Rd
k
r ee
mC
P lu
Mine r Dr
W olff Dr
Sherman
Beebetown Brunswick Corners
Cossett Creek
Golf Club
Bell
S Carpenter Rd
Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA,

L au r e l R d L a ure l R d NPS, USDA
APPENDIX E
ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW
A desktop review of environmental information available in ODOT’s TIMS online mapping system
showed the potential for streams and wetlands in the project area. Suitable wooded habitat
for bats was also identified on both sides of I-71. All four quadrants of the project area are
residential and are therefore classified as Noise Sensitive Areas; an existing noise wall was
identified on the west side of I-71 south of Boston Road in the TIMS review. There are no parks
or other potential 4f properties identified in the initial desktop review, and no 6f resources
present in the initial review of the Land and Water Conservation Fund’s online mapping tool.
An initial review of the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 2021 data for
underserved populations in TIMS showed that there may be a higher percentage of LEP
populations in the northwest portion of the project area. A more detailed analysis may need
to be done in a future phase of this project, and targeted outreach should occur throughout
the project process.
A desktop review of ODOT’s Ohio Regulated Properties Search (ORPS) Tool shows a spill reported
in the project area. No other regulated materials are immediately present in the area.
A review of Ohio’s State Historic Preservation Office’s (SHPO) online mapping system showed
that the project area had previously been surveyed for archeological sites and historic
structures with multiple archeological sites being found. There are no National Register listed
or DOE properties or National Historic Landmarks identified in the SHPO mapping.
Current levels of design for the project show right-of-way impacts of up to 54 permanent takes,
including up to 15 total takes. A desktop review of the impacted properties indicates that the
total takes may result in up to 14 relocations.
APPENDIX F
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
Following a review of existing utility plans obtained through Ohio Utility Protection Service
(OUPS) (Ohio 811) coordination, a field review was conducted.
Numerous facilities are present at the Boston Road overpass at I-71. Parallel with Boston Road,
under I-71, are a 10” & 18” sanitary sewers (Medina County Sanitary Engineer), 12” water main
(City of Cleveland Division of Water), and a 6” gas main (Columbia Gas), north of the bridge. A
culvert crosses under Boston Road at each bridge approach. A telecom cable (AT&T) follows
the west I-71 limited access right-of-way. Buckeye Pipelines and AT&T telecom lines are within
private easements outside of the public road right-of-way.
The primary cost driver for utility coordination/relocation is a pair of privately held 12”
petroleum lines that are owned by Buckeye Pipeline located within their own easements. The
cost of relocating them will be part of the project cost but that cost is not included in the
estimated construction cost tables. A review of plans prepared in 2003, indicates that there
may be some mitigation by moving the roadway centerline to avoid the pipelines in some areas.
Aerial electric (Illuminating Company) and telecom (AT&T, Breezeline, Charter, Frontier) are
present along the north side of Boston both east and west of I-71. Existing lighting is present
along Boston Road from Howe Road to Benbow Road and exists primarily at the intersections.
The sanitary sewers present along the south side of Boston Road connect with a lift station and
two sanitary lines along the east side of North Carpenter Road.
An Existing Utilities Exhibit indicating the location of these and other utilities in the project
study area is provided below.
HOWE ROAD
STU
RBR
IDG
E
LA
EN
DUXBURY LANE
N. CARPENTER ROAD
BOSTON ROAD
I-71 (SO
UTHBO
UND)
I-71 (N
ORTHB
OUND)
BENBOW ROAD
TRAIL
LANDINGS
HA
RT
OR F
WAIT D
E FAR TR
MS LA
NE
AIL
BOSTON ROAD
EXISTING UTILITY EXHIBIT

N
BOSTON ROAD
APPENDIX G
TRAFFIC VOLUMES METHODOLOGY

TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Opening year for this study is 2027, with a design year of 2047. Traffic analysis for this study
takes into consideration 2025 and 2045 model year volumes provided by NOACA, Euthenics
traffic counts at the analysis intersections along SR 303, Boston Road, and SR 82, as well as
ODOT traffic counts on the freeway that correlate with the traffic collected by Euthenics.
Traffic plates prepared by Euthenics and TranSystems, incorporated these sources and are
included in Appendix E. These traffic plates have not yet been certified by ODOT’s Office of
Technical Services. Supporting information, used to create these traffic plates is included in
Appendix I.
Data Collection
Using pole-mounted cameras, video footage was collected at eight intersections along and near
Boston Road on October 4, 2022, at four intersections along SR 82 on October 12, 2022, and at
five intersections along SR 303 on October 18, 2022. Turn movement data at all seventeen
intersections was manually obtained from the video footage between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM.
Additional data obtained from ODOT’s Transportation Data Management System (MS2) was also
utilized for this study. Data from two automatic traffic recorders (ATR) were used to obtain
traffic along I-71. ATR 577 is located on I-71 north of SR 82 and ATR 611 is located on I-71
between SR 82 and SR 303. Traffic is recorded daily for these locations. Data for the ATR
locations was reviewed for each of the three video collection dates for the adjacent roadway
systems. Traffic volumes were observed to be greater on October 12th, 2022 than the other
two collection dates. Therefore, this date was used to obtain volumes at the ATR locations to
be conservative. Additionally, one traffic count location from ODOT’s MS2 was utilized for this
study. The count location was on SR 303 east of I-71 (Location ID 17552) and data was collected
in March of 2022.
Peak Hours
The total traffic for each intersection was calculated in one-hour periods, staggered at fifteen
minute intervals between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM. The 60 minute period with the greatest volume
determined the system peak hours (7:00 AM – 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM – 5:30 PM). Additionally,
these system peak hours were checked by calculating peak hours at each individual
intersection. The mode (most common value) supported an AM peak hour of 7:00 AM – 8:00 AM
and a PM peak hour of 4:30 PM – 5:30 PM, as determined above. It should be noted that the AM
peak hour coincides with the beginning of the data collection period. The increasing trend of
traffic volumes for 15-minute periods within the hour suggested the calculated AM system peak
hour was valid and would not occur earlier than 7:00 AM.
Design Hour Volumes (DHVs)
The Ohio Department of Transportation’s Transportation Information Mapping System (ODOT

TIMS) was used to determine functional class of each roadway included in the study (e.g. SR 82
is Principal Arterial Other). These functional classes, along with month and day of data
collection, were used to determine which of ODOT’s Peak Hour to Design Hour Factor tables
contained the appropriate DHV factors for each roadway. Peak hour volumes were then
multiplied by these factors to find DHVs for each turn movement at all intersections.
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)
Site specific data for hourly traffic distribution throughout the day was utilized for this study.
ODOT’s Transportation Data Management System (TDMS) MS2 was checked for recent traffic
data in the study area that contained 24 hour counts. A recent traffic count (ID 17552 from
March 2022) was available on SR 303 east of I-71. The previously mentioned ATR locations had
24 hour counts available. Additional counts from the collected videos were manually performed
on Boston Road and SR 82 to obtain hourly volume percentages.
These sources were used to determine typical hourly percentages of total daily traffic for each
study area. These percentages were then applied to the eleven hours of count data for each
intersection to determine ADT for each turn movement. The total vehicles counted during the
study period divided by the sum of hourly percentages corresponding to hours studied equals
the total ADT for any given movement.
ODOT’s seasonal adjustment factor tables were used to convert ADT to AADT. Roadway
classification along with the day and month of traffic data collection were used to determine
the appropriate seasonal adjustment factor.
Existing Balanced Traffic Plates
After AM Peak and PM Peak design hour volumes and AADT’s were determined, the percent
variation of traffic entering and exiting a roadway segment was calculated and evaluated for
accuracy. Balancing and smoothing techniques stated in the Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
were used to resolve any discrepancies found. The Higher Volume Distributed method was
used. ODOT approved the existing traffic plates and methods used on February 10th, 2023.
Traffic Generation Resources
Several resources were used along with the existing traffic volumes to estimate future opening
year (2027) and design year (2047) traffic volumes.
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) provided 2025 and 2045 modeling
information for a No Build scenario as well as three possible build scenarios (Alternatives 3, 4,
and full interchange).
ODOT developed a forecast adjustment tool spreadsheet based on methods from the National
Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 255 and NCHRP 765 reports. This spreadsheet
will be later referred to as the NCHRP spreadsheet. The NCHRP spreadsheet utilizes count year
traffic data, K-factors, and base and future travel demand model results to estimate the future
year link volumes and intersection turning movement volumes.
No Build Traffic Generation
The balanced 2022 existing traffic data as well as the modeling information provided from
NOACA was input into the NCHRP spreadsheets. Turning movement traffic volumes were
produced for 2027 and 2047 for AM, PM, and 24-hour periods.
The 2027 and 2047 No Build volumes were normalized using the same balancing methods
methods as the 2022 existing traffic volumes. The percent variation of traffic entering and
exiting a roadway segment was evaluated. Balancing and smoothing techniques stated in the
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual were used to resolve discrepancies. The Higher Volume
Distributed method was used. Any areas with negative growth from 2027 to 2047 were manually
adjusted to have a growth rate of zero.
The traffic plates with these adjustments are referred to as the balanced traffic plates. The
balanced No Build traffic plates are provided in Appendix H.
Build Traffic Generation
The 2022 count volumes were processed through the NCHRP spreadsheets using the 2025/2045
NOACA model growth rates to generate 2027/2047 Build Condition volumes. For the Build
Condition, 2025 Opening Year volumes were used as the basis for interpolating the 2027 Opening
Year volumes used in this Study's Model.
For intersections with new links (at the Boston Road interchange), it was necessary to utilize
the model turn movement data entry feature in the PM, AM and 24 HR NCHRP spreadsheet tabs,
as no existing movements were available in the existing condition. The intersections of Boston
Road and the NB and SB ramps, as well as the intersections of Boston Road with Howe and N
Carpenter, solely relied on model turn movement data due to the high level of impact to traffic
patterns anticipated in those locations for all alternatives. For all other locations throughout
the project, model turning movement was entered into the NCHRP spreadsheets, and the
spreadsheets relied on a combination of both the model turning movement data and the count
data for the estimation of the opening and design year turning movement volumes. During the
balancing process, the projected ramp volumes and the mainline volumes entering/exiting the
study area were adjusted up or down according to the relationships reported in the NOACA
model outputs between the No Build and Build alternatives (by percent change from No Build
to Build). This step was taken to ensure that the balanced volumes would represent the changes
in traffic patterns predicted by the NOACA model as accurately as possible.
The model growth rates showed negative values in some instances. In these cases, in the Build
condition, the opening year volumes were not adjusted upward to meet the existing count
volumes, as the initial reduction in traffic volumes may be assumed to be a consequence of
changes in traffic patterns due to the presence of the new interchange. However, any negative
growth between the opening and design years was adjusted upwards to meet the opening year
volumes at a minimum. After adjusting for negative growth rates in the design year,
balancing/smoothing was performed between any Howe Road or Carpenter Road intersections
and adjacent ramp intersections to within 5% tolerance. Complete balancing/smoothing was
performed between interchange ramp intersections and along the IR-71 mainline. No
balancing/smoothing was performed for intersections separated by significant distances as
illustrated by cut lines on the traffic plates because of the number of traffic generators/traffic
sinks between the intersections. This information was sent to ODOT’s Office of Modeling and
Forecasting for review.
The final balanced traffic volumes for the 2027 opening year and 2047 design year build
conditions are provided in Appendix H.
Additionally, truck percentages as well as peak hour factors were calculated from the existing
traffic data. These values are provided in Appendix H.
Turn Lane Length Calculations
The required storage lengths for the turn lanes were calculated based on methods detailed in
ODOT’s Location and Design Manual, Volume 1 using the design year (2047) traffic volumes.
These calculations are used to approximate the roadway layout and potential impacts near the
proposed Boston Road interchange location. The turn lane length calculations are provided in
Appendix N.
APPENDIX H
TRAFFIC PLATES
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2027 AM BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2027 PM BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2027 AADT BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2047 AM BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2047 PM BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD NO-BUILD 2047 AADT BALANCED

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 BUILD ALTERNATIVE 1 - AM PEAK HOUR

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 BUILD ALTERNATIVE 1 - PM PEAK HOUR B

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 BUILD ALTERNATIVE 3 - AADT BALAN

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 BUILD ALTERNATIVE 4 - AADT BALAN

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 FULL BUILD ALTERNATIVE - AADT BAL

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 FULL BUILD ALTERNATIVE - AM PEAK HOUR

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2027/2047 FULL BUILD ALTERNATIVE - PM PEAK HOUR

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR PERCENT TRUCKS

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR PERCENT TRUCKS

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD EXISTING AM PHF

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD EXISTING PM PHF

INTERCHANGE
APPENDIX I
SUPPORTING TRAFFIC INFORMATION

Raw Traffic Data
CITY: Brunswick/Strongsville
STREETS: Benbow Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022
WEATHER: 54°-60° Cloudy / Rainy TRAFFIC COUNT
START FROM: N FROM: E FROM: S FROM: W TOTALS

TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PEDS LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PEDS LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PEDS LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PEDS
6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 2 0 63 0 2 0 74 0 139
7:15 AM 1 3 0 59 1 6 1 86 2 151
7:30 AM 0 5 0 83 1 2 1 95 1 185
7:45 AM 2 2 0 94 3 0 7 81 4 189
TOTAL: 3 12 0 299 5 10 9 336 7 664
APPROACH
15 304 345
TOTAL
8:00 AM 0 2 0 57 1 2 2 74 0 136
8:15 AM 0 3 0 59 0 1 1 67 0 130
8:30 AM 0 3 0 63 1 2 6 67 1 140
8:45 AM 1 3 0 65 2 2 1 85 6 157
TOTAL: 1 11 0 244 4 7 10 293 7 563
APPROACH
12 248 303
TOTAL
9:00 AM 0 3 0 49 0 3 1 65 2 118
9:15 AM 1 3 0 51 1 0 1 46 0 103
9:30 AM 3 4 0 46 2 1 1 55 3 111
9:45 AM 0 2 0 39 2 1 1 40 1 84
TOTAL: 4 12 0 185 5 5 4 206 6 416
APPROACH
16 190 210
TOTAL
10:00 AM 0 1 0 49 1 4 0 50 4 101
10:15 AM 2 1 1 63 0 2 3 53 0 122
10:30 AM 3 0 0 48 0 3 3 59 1 113
10:45 AM 2 2 1 73 2 4 2 55 3 136
TOTAL: 7 4 2 233 3 13 8 217 8 472
APPROACH
11 236 225
TOTAL
11:00 AM 1 3 0 48 2 0 0 53 2 107
11:15 AM 1 5 0 48 5 1 1 45 1 105
11:30 AM 0 2 0 61 1 0 2 69 3 135
11:45 AM 1 7 0 60 2 4 3 61 2 134
TOTAL: 3 17 0 217 10 5 6 228 8 481
APPROACH
20 227 234
TOTAL
12:00 PM 0 6 0 68 1 3 3 55 1 133
12:15 PM 1 3 0 43 0 1 3 53 1 103
12:30 PM 3 2 0 60 0 0 2 69 1 136
12:45 PM 1 1 0 65 2 2 3 61 3 133
TOTAL: 5 12 0 236 3 6 11 238 6 505
APPROACH
17 239 249
TOTAL
1:00 PM 0 1 0 76 0 4 4 49 1 130
1:15 PM 1 6 0 55 1 3 4 44 1 111
1:30 PM 0 4 0 56 0 0 4 65 1 129
1:45 PM 0 2 1 68 0 2 6 60 4 136
TOTAL: 1 13 1 255 1 9 18 218 7 506
APPROACH
14 256 236
TOTAL
2:00 PM 1 4 0 74 1 4 3 58 2 141
2:15 PM 2 2 0 73 1 2 2 73 0 153
2:30 PM 2 6 0 62 1 1 3 78 2 152
2:45 PM 0 5 0 87 3 3 3 74 2 172
TOTAL: 5 17 0 296 6 10 11 283 6 618
APPROACH
22 302 294
TOTAL
3:00 PM 3 0 0 81 0 0 6 77 1 167
3:15 PM 4 0 0 91 5 2 8 56 0 164
3:30 PM 2 0 0 99 7 2 6 92 0 206
3:45 PM 3 3 0 97 1 1 2 77 3 183
TOTAL: 12 3 0 368 13 5 22 302 4 720
APPROACH
15 381 324
TOTAL
4:00 PM 2 6 0 116 0 1 4 81 1 209

4:15 PM 1 3 0 122 3 2 4 91 1 224
4:30 PM 4 3 0 121 1 1 5 77 1 211
4:45 PM 4 7 0 124 3 2 3 85 1 226
TOTAL: 11 19 0 483 7 6 16 334 4 870
APPROACH
30 490 350
TOTAL
5:00 PM 1 8 0 120 1 2 6 97 1 233

5:15 PM 1 12 0 123 3 0 2 100 3 241
5:30 PM 1 5 0 138 0 0 3 102 0 249
5:45 PM 2 2 0 129 4 3 4 84 1 225
TOTAL: 5 27 0 510 8 5 15 383 5 948
APPROACH
32 518 398
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: Drake Road and Howe Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 14 14 18 0 1 35 31 0 6 101 3 0 97 49 4 2 373

7:15 AM 8 18 20 0 0 36 49 0 8 130 0 0 72 43 2 0 386
7:30 AM 14 16 26 1 1 44 40 0 7 112 3 0 77 50 5 0 395
7:45 AM 19 19 29 0 1 72 37 1 9 108 7 0 82 58 14 0 455
TOTAL: 55 67 93 1 3 187 157 1 30 451 13 0 328 200 25 2 1609
APPROACH
215 347 494 553
TOTAL
8:00 AM 17 35 25 2 3 37 27 2 5 104 7 2 73 46 5 2 384

8:15 AM 16 20 33 2 4 53 38 0 8 72 5 0 57 60 7 3 373
8:30 AM 23 24 28 2 1 41 19 3 5 86 6 1 72 59 5 0 369
8:45 AM 17 21 41 0 5 82 47 3 13 75 8 0 50 39 4 0 402
TOTAL: 73 100 127 6 13 213 131 8 31 337 26 3 252 204 21 5 1528
APPROACH
300 357 394 477
TOTAL
9:00 AM 11 31 24 1 3 50 46 4 11 63 5 0 48 39 5 1 336
9:15 AM 11 23 22 1 1 46 43 1 6 62 2 0 61 40 3 1 320
9:30 AM 14 17 22 0 0 33 30 0 5 65 2 2 30 46 3 4 267
9:45 AM 12 33 22 2 3 51 39 7 8 51 2 0 38 33 4 2 296
TOTAL: 48 104 90 4 7 180 158 12 30 241 11 2 177 158 15 8 1219
APPROACH
242 345 282 350
TOTAL
10:00 AM 16 22 24 1 0 39 26 8 2 51 1 0 53 46 9 1 289
10:15 AM 13 34 33 0 1 27 24 2 1 57 1 1 33 34 6 0 264
10:30 AM 22 22 28 0 1 33 27 1 5 60 3 0 32 35 4 0 272
10:45 AM 21 30 39 1 3 37 44 1 9 63 3 2 28 34 3 3 314
TOTAL: 72 108 124 2 5 136 121 12 17 231 8 3 146 149 22 4 1139
APPROACH
304 262 256 317
TOTAL
11:00 AM 19 55 23 4 0 40 32 2 10 50 5 0 33 42 5 4 314
11:15 AM 36 40 19 1 4 40 31 3 5 57 4 0 43 33 5 2 317
11:30 AM 32 48 27 0 0 44 40 3 10 69 3 0 41 30 2 1 346
11:45 AM 22 40 27 0 4 63 43 3 5 63 1 1 26 37 7 6 338
TOTAL: 109 183 96 5 8 187 146 11 30 239 13 1 143 142 19 13 1315
APPROACH
388 341 282 304
TOTAL
12:00 PM 30 41 20 0 3 44 32 3 9 50 4 0 28 37 10 2 308
12:15 PM 24 46 31 1 3 48 33 2 6 56 4 1 47 39 8 5 345
12:30 PM 27 52 25 2 3 52 31 3 15 62 2 0 28 40 5 0 342
12:45 PM 35 41 41 2 3 48 30 1 8 60 3 0 39 63 8 3 379
TOTAL: 116 180 117 5 12 192 126 9 38 228 13 1 142 179 31 10 1374
APPROACH
413 330 279 352
TOTAL
1:00 PM 25 47 30 1 3 40 34 5 3 56 1 0 41 52 7 2 339
1:15 PM 35 60 32 1 2 46 24 5 2 48 1 1 40 46 13 3 349
1:30 PM 33 66 31 0 1 49 36 3 5 56 2 0 36 52 3 1 370
1:45 PM 28 48 29 3 4 38 31 1 10 67 1 0 21 38 1 0 316
TOTAL: 121 221 122 5 10 173 125 14 20 227 5 1 138 188 24 6 1374
APPROACH
464 308 252 350
TOTAL
2:00 PM 31 62 39 1 4 44 33 0 8 58 4 3 38 67 7 1 395
2:15 PM 31 54 37 1 2 44 27 2 7 44 3 3 43 67 7 9 366
2:30 PM 33 56 33 0 3 52 32 3 8 65 2 0 45 79 7 3 415
2:45 PM 25 63 46 1 6 66 24 4 5 53 4 0 34 65 10 1 401
TOTAL: 120 235 155 3 15 206 116 9 28 220 13 6 160 278 31 14 1577
APPROACH
510 337 261 469
TOTAL
3:00 PM 35 69 44 1 5 41 32 4 7 61 3 0 54 51 8 1 410
3:15 PM 44 80 46 0 5 51 30 3 8 56 2 0 37 56 6 1 421
3:30 PM 54 93 53 2 7 63 30 2 6 45 5 0 49 65 10 2 480
3:45 PM 34 92 80 0 3 48 25 2 12 81 0 0 48 53 3 4 479
TOTAL: 167 334 223 3 20 203 117 11 33 243 10 0 188 225 27 8 1790
APPROACH
724 340 286 440
TOTAL
4:00 PM 45 88 59 0 3 73 32 2 12 44 2 2 34 63 11 2 466
4:15 PM 50 95 66 2 8 68 40 2 10 60 6 0 41 56 10 1 510
4:30 PM 41 99 58 0 4 88 42 3 16 67 7 0 62 97 14 2 595
4:45 PM 47 90 57 0 6 80 36 3 10 68 1 3 50 77 9 1 531
TOTAL: 183 372 240 2 21 309 150 10 48 239 16 5 187 293 44 6 2102
APPROACH
795 480 303 524
TOTAL
5:00 PM 35 89 61 1 5 72 37 5 12 69 5 1 60 102 13 0 560

5:15 PM 39 84 53 1 12 118 46 3 16 72 7 0 68 87 15 2 617
5:30 PM 36 95 76 1 5 80 43 4 11 75 3 0 63 66 8 0 561
5:45 PM 46 83 66 2 3 104 44 0 12 60 7 1 45 61 12 4 543
TOTAL: 156 351 256 5 25 374 170 12 51 276 22 2 236 316 48 6 2281
APPROACH
763 569 349 600
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: Drake Road and Hunt Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 1 16 1 43 1 0 47 25 4 133
7:15 AM 2 38 0 47 6 0 42 20 0 155
7:30 AM 1 44 0 54 2 0 44 20 3 165
7:45 AM 2 48 2 44 6 1 61 29 0 190
TOTAL: 6 146 3 188 15 1 194 94 7 643
APPROACH
152 203 288
TOTAL
8:00 AM 1 37 1 36 9 0 55 23 2 161
8:15 AM 3 51 1 39 3 0 45 24 1 165
8:30 AM 2 31 0 35 8 3 61 25 1 162
8:45 AM 7 71 0 49 18 4 64 10 0 219
TOTAL: 13 190 2 159 38 7 225 82 4 707
APPROACH
203 197 307
TOTAL
9:00 AM 7 52 0 42 3 2 35 18 0 157
9:15 AM 0 43 0 44 1 0 33 16 0 137
9:30 AM 2 29 0 35 1 0 38 25 4 130
9:45 AM 0 43 1 41 2 3 28 23 1 137
TOTAL: 9 167 1 162 7 5 134 82 5 561
APPROACH
176 169 216
TOTAL
10:00 AM 0 38 0 31 0 5 38 24 0 131
10:15 AM 3 24 0 29 2 3 33 16 0 107
10:30 AM 1 37 0 22 0 0 32 28 0 120
10:45 AM 1 34 0 46 2 2 32 25 4 140
TOTAL: 5 133 0 128 4 10 135 93 4 498
APPROACH
138 132 228
TOTAL
11:00 AM 2 33 0 38 0 3 39 23 2 135
11:15 AM 1 37 0 35 2 3 39 30 1 144
11:30 AM 1 39 0 52 4 2 38 26 0 160
11:45 AM 6 62 3 44 6 0 32 29 2 179
TOTAL: 10 171 3 169 12 8 148 108 5 618
APPROACH
181 181 256
TOTAL
12:00 PM 1 32 1 47 2 3 38 33 3 153
12:15 PM 3 45 1 34 3 0 37 29 4 151
12:30 PM 0 54 0 34 1 2 34 36 0 159
12:45 PM 3 47 1 34 8 0 49 48 2 189
TOTAL: 7 178 3 149 14 5 158 146 9 652
APPROACH
185 163 304
TOTAL
1:00 PM 2 44 1 34 2 2 50 29 2 161
1:15 PM 3 39 1 31 2 0 40 40 2 155
1:30 PM 3 54 1 38 2 2 40 49 1 186
1:45 PM 2 35 0 36 0 0 32 31 1 136
TOTAL: 10 172 3 139 6 4 162 149 6 638
APPROACH
182 145 311
TOTAL
2:00 PM 0 36 0 41 3 0 63 38 0 181
2:15 PM 5 46 0 30 3 0 52 47 3 183
2:30 PM 0 45 0 36 3 1 46 57 2 187
2:45 PM 0 52 1 30 3 1 47 40 1 172
TOTAL: 5 179 1 137 12 2 208 182 6 723
APPROACH
184 149 390
TOTAL
3:00 PM 4 47 1 32 5 2 48 35 1 171
3:15 PM 3 57 1 28 11 3 53 55 2 207
3:30 PM 7 77 0 29 11 2 56 57 1 237
3:45 PM 2 52 0 35 1 2 39 45 1 174
TOTAL: 16 233 2 124 28 9 196 192 5 789
APPROACH
249 152 388
TOTAL
4:00 PM 2 67 0 33 6 2 57 57 1 222
4:15 PM 8 66 0 52 12 2 48 62 1 248
4:30 PM 7 76 0 49 2 1 82 55 2 271
4:45 PM 5 73 0 58 4 3 69 58 0 267
TOTAL: 22 282 0 192 24 8 256 232 4 1008
APPROACH
304 216 488
TOTAL
5:00 PM 5 72 0 53 1 4 87 47 0 265
5:15 PM 6 102 0 53 2 3 84 53 2 300
5:30 PM 5 76 0 48 2 1 52 55 0 238
5:45 PM 1 91 0 52 3 0 67 50 4 264
TOTAL: 17 341 0 206 8 8 290 205 6 1067
APPROACH
358 214 495
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
STREETS: Howe Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 13 9 0 0 43 27 1 65 68 1 225
7:15 AM 12 11 1 0 42 37 6 66 64 2 232
7:30 AM 15 14 0 0 50 46 3 61 76 1 262
7:45 AM 21 12 0 0 80 40 0 44 81 5 278
TOTAL: 61 46 1 0 215 150 10 236 289 9 997
APPROACH
107 365 525
TOTAL
8:00 AM 10 23 1 0 50 27 1 50 68 2 228
8:15 AM 19 13 0 0 47 32 2 33 63 3 207
8:30 AM 16 12 1 0 46 32 3 39 64 5 209
8:45 AM 13 8 0 0 57 31 2 37 83 7 229
TOTAL: 58 56 2 0 200 122 8 159 278 17 873
APPROACH
114 322 437
TOTAL
9:00 AM 26 21 2 0 45 30 3 37 60 5 219
9:15 AM 16 12 1 0 52 25 3 33 57 2 195
9:30 AM 14 7 1 1 41 26 2 36 42 4 167
9:45 AM 14 14 2 0 37 23 3 25 39 2 152
TOTAL: 70 54 6 1 175 104 11 131 198 13 733
APPROACH
124 280 329
TOTAL
10:00 AM 18 12 1 0 43 19 8 26 46 3 164
10:15 AM 24 8 0 0 39 25 5 26 50 1 172
10:30 AM 13 10 0 0 44 38 2 26 57 1 188
10:45 AM 13 14 0 0 52 34 6 23 50 3 186
TOTAL: 68 44 1 0 178 116 21 101 203 8 710
APPROACH
112 294 304
TOTAL
11:00 AM 24 16 0 0 46 27 2 20 42 3 175
11:15 AM 28 13 0 0 30 30 2 22 39 1 162
11:30 AM 20 28 0 0 49 36 4 29 52 3 214
11:45 AM 24 18 0 0 57 30 8 32 55 3 216
TOTAL: 96 75 0 0 182 123 16 103 188 10 767
APPROACH
171 305 291
TOTAL
12:00 PM 39 17 2 0 52 31 1 27 41 1 207
12:15 PM 23 20 0 1 31 29 1 26 56 2 186
12:30 PM 30 23 3 0 49 35 1 27 53 3 217
12:45 PM 28 12 2 0 54 32 1 23 70 3 219
TOTAL: 120 72 7 1 186 127 4 103 220 9 829
APPROACH
192 314 323
TOTAL
1:00 PM 31 16 1 1 56 39 6 26 52 3 221
1:15 PM 33 30 0 1 47 25 4 18 57 4 211
1:30 PM 43 20 0 0 45 36 2 27 49 1 220
1:45 PM 24 28 1 0 47 43 2 28 50 4 220
TOTAL: 131 94 2 2 195 143 14 99 208 12 872
APPROACH
225 340 307
TOTAL
2:00 PM 37 17 1 0 53 39 6 23 41 6 210
2:15 PM 37 23 0 0 50 20 7 28 61 2 219
2:30 PM 39 25 1 0 56 35 4 28 74 4 257
2:45 PM 27 26 1 0 79 32 7 22 73 2 259
TOTAL: 140 91 3 0 238 126 24 101 249 14 945
APPROACH
231 364 350
TOTAL
3:00 PM 35 31 2 0 66 27 1 28 77 1 264
3:15 PM 40 31 0 0 67 33 2 29 53 0 253
3:30 PM 34 41 0 0 75 37 0 27 94 3 308
3:45 PM 39 40 0 0 78 37 1 24 76 4 294
TOTAL: 148 143 2 0 286 134 4 108 300 8 1119
APPROACH
291 420 408
TOTAL
4:00 PM 41 45 0 0 87 33 3 27 79 2 312
4:15 PM 41 42 0 0 95 35 2 29 86 2 328
4:30 PM 54 39 0 0 99 41 1 29 62 3 324
4:45 PM 41 32 0 0 99 41 1 33 76 1 322
TOTAL: 177 158 0 0 380 150 7 118 303 8 1286
APPROACH
335 530 421
TOTAL
5:00 PM 41 41 2 0 97 41 2 33 101 4 354

5:15 PM 37 33 0 0 95 37 0 32 79 3 313
5:30 PM 43 42 0 0 104 49 1 33 109 3 380
5:45 PM 43 37 0 0 90 34 3 22 75 1 301
TOTAL: 164 153 2 0 386 161 6 120 364 11 1348
APPROACH
317 547 484
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
STREETS: North Carpenter Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 22 46 1 32 0 18 1 51 34 1 203
7:15 AM 12 49 1 33 0 25 1 64 20 0 203
7:30 AM 31 61 2 28 0 19 1 74 27 0 240
7:45 AM 20 76 0 56 0 23 1 71 34 0 280
TOTAL: 85 232 4 149 0 85 4 260 115 1 926
APPROACH
317 234 375
TOTAL
8:00 AM 36 6 3 33 0 21 1 49 23 0 168
8:15 AM 17 42 1 39 0 18 2 50 28 0 194
8:30 AM 21 40 1 34 0 20 1 59 26 4 200
8:45 AM 15 56 0 28 0 15 0 74 29 2 217
TOTAL: 89 144 5 134 0 74 4 232 106 6 779
APPROACH
233 208 338
TOTAL
9:00 AM 7 47 1 33 0 6 0 62 30 5 185
9:15 AM 10 45 1 29 0 8 0 43 32 0 167
9:30 AM 9 39 1 27 0 13 0 40 19 0 147
9:45 AM 10 32 1 29 0 13 0 28 27 1 139
TOTAL: 36 163 4 118 0 40 0 173 108 6 638
APPROACH
199 158 281
TOTAL
10:00 AM 9 34 0 21 0 9 0 43 18 1 134
10:15 AM 21 46 1 26 0 14 0 40 37 0 184
10:30 AM 11 35 0 40 0 18 0 53 25 0 182
10:45 AM 20 57 1 37 0 13 1 48 25 2 200
TOTAL: 61 172 2 124 0 54 1 184 105 3 700
APPROACH
233 178 289
TOTAL
11:00 AM 7 44 0 26 0 18 1 38 29 0 162
11:15 AM 20 35 0 30 0 12 1 35 36 0 168
11:30 AM 12 54 0 32 0 18 0 50 25 1 191
11:45 AM 12 52 3 33 0 17 0 49 34 1 197
TOTAL: 51 185 3 121 0 65 2 172 124 2 718
APPROACH
236 186 296
TOTAL
12:00 PM 24 51 1 19 0 6 0 43 38 0 181
12:15 PM 14 38 0 17 0 10 0 46 34 0 159
12:30 PM 11 52 0 17 1 16 0 53 39 0 189
12:45 PM 16 48 0 41 0 15 0 56 47 0 223
TOTAL: 65 189 1 94 1 47 0 198 158 0 752
APPROACH
254 142 356
TOTAL
1:00 PM 22 61 1 33 0 13 0 38 44 0 211
1:15 PM 18 42 0 31 0 12 2 40 42 3 185
1:30 PM 12 47 0 34 0 17 0 55 46 0 211
1:45 PM 29 49 0 44 0 21 0 49 32 1 224
TOTAL: 81 199 1 142 0 63 2 182 164 4 831
APPROACH
280 205 346
TOTAL
2:00 PM 14 58 1 32 0 20 0 41 39 0 204
2:15 PM 20 50 1 13 0 14 0 47 43 0 187
2:30 PM 24 46 0 16 2 11 7 58 54 1 211
2:45 PM 12 68 1 40 0 10 0 63 44 2 237
TOTAL: 70 222 3 101 2 55 7 209 180 3 839
APPROACH
292 158 389
TOTAL
3:00 PM 24 51 1 32 0 19 1 59 54 1 239
3:15 PM 26 58 1 31 1 15 2 47 44 0 222
3:30 PM 21 77 1 33 1 9 1 85 45 0 271
3:45 PM 23 74 2 38 0 20 0 54 56 2 265
TOTAL: 94 260 5 134 2 63 4 245 199 3 997
APPROACH
354 199 444
TOTAL
4:00 PM 30 80 2 31 0 15 0 68 40 0 264
4:15 PM 27 81 2 5 0 7 0 67 61 1 248
4:30 PM 27 102 0 21 0 7 0 53 66 0 276
4:45 PM 43 81 0 41 0 20 0 72 59 0 316
TOTAL: 127 344 4 98 0 49 0 260 226 1 1104
APPROACH
471 147 486
TOTAL
5:00 PM 33 95 0 31 0 15 0 86 56 0 316
5:15 PM 35 90 0 44 0 15 1 87 49 1 320
5:30 PM 35 103 0 55 0 35 0 84 62 1 374
5:45 PM 33 92 0 42 0 22 0 57 67 0 313
TOTAL: 136 380 0 172 0 87 1 314 234 2 1323
APPROACH
516 259 548
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: North Carpenter Road and Grafton Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 2 50 14 1 65 42 4 4 8 12 15 2 15 70 25 1 322
7:15 AM 10 26 15 0 25 45 8 1 11 25 23 3 21 75 22 3 306
7:30 AM 6 35 13 2 23 60 9 7 7 28 22 0 17 69 22 3 311
7:45 AM 15 55 18 1 25 38 12 3 18 35 21 0 15 66 34 4 352
TOTAL: 33 166 60 4 138 185 33 15 44 100 81 5 68 280 103 11 1291
APPROACH
259 356 225 451
TOTAL
8:00 AM 8 30 12 0 16 32 10 2 19 24 10 1 15 63 21 4 260
8:15 AM 8 41 9 0 9 30 7 0 15 28 13 4 13 47 11 2 231
8:30 AM 5 40 13 4 10 35 7 2 17 20 10 0 22 42 18 2 239
8:45 AM 10 33 9 3 27 54 4 7 17 38 19 5 10 39 29 3 289
TOTAL: 31 144 43 7 62 151 28 11 68 110 52 10 60 191 79 11 1019
APPROACH
218 241 230 330
TOTAL
9:00 AM 5 33 5 0 10 32 5 3 12 25 12 1 13 47 11 2 210
9:15 AM 5 28 8 1 18 24 5 2 11 24 9 3 10 28 12 2 182
9:30 AM 5 33 3 2 15 17 7 2 10 26 16 0 8 24 14 0 178
9:45 AM 3 33 14 0 16 22 6 1 15 22 15 1 5 33 15 4 199
TOTAL: 18 127 30 3 59 95 23 8 48 97 52 5 36 132 52 8 769
APPROACH
175 177 197 220
TOTAL
10:00 AM 2 22 9 2 15 20 4 1 9 26 11 4 6 26 18 1 168
10:15 AM 6 41 16 0 18 17 4 0 17 22 16 0 9 33 19 9 218
10:30 AM 3 30 8 0 24 27 10 1 18 27 15 1 17 21 13 1 213
10:45 AM 4 30 17 0 9 19 6 0 19 30 24 2 9 39 23 3 229
TOTAL: 15 123 50 2 66 83 24 2 63 105 66 7 41 119 73 14 828
APPROACH
188 173 234 233
TOTAL
11:00 AM 6 29 16 1 14 28 3 4 18 30 9 1 16 40 13 1 222
11:15 AM 8 44 14 2 22 25 3 1 15 20 25 3 15 28 22 0 241
11:30 AM 6 29 7 0 13 35 8 1 12 37 15 3 11 40 14 2 227
11:45 AM 6 35 11 0 17 38 7 1 17 33 22 0 19 36 16 3 257
TOTAL: 26 137 48 3 66 126 21 7 62 120 71 7 61 144 65 6 947
APPROACH
211 213 253 270
TOTAL
12:00 PM 7 39 17 0 23 27 10 1 13 28 18 0 14 20 19 3 235
12:15 PM 7 36 15 2 16 41 8 3 20 27 15 1 13 28 20 2 246
12:30 PM 7 28 11 1 15 28 4 3 26 39 18 5 10 48 23 2 257
12:45 PM 6 53 16 0 23 24 10 1 21 32 20 1 14 33 17 2 269
TOTAL: 27 156 59 3 77 120 32 8 80 126 71 7 51 129 79 9 1007
APPROACH
242 229 277 259
TOTAL
1:00 PM 4 48 17 1 16 32 2 2 19 38 20 0 11 37 18 2 262
1:15 PM 9 51 14 2 17 44 2 2 23 28 18 3 10 34 14 0 264
1:30 PM 10 37 17 1 11 29 7 2 27 38 23 5 10 29 15 2 253
1:45 PM 7 31 15 0 12 34 7 1 17 39 18 1 16 38 24 1 258
TOTAL: 30 167 63 4 56 139 18 7 86 143 79 9 47 138 71 5 1037
APPROACH
260 213 308 256
TOTAL
2:00 PM 6 37 13 3 19 40 8 0 17 25 20 2 16 24 26 4 251
2:15 PM 4 44 15 1 16 36 7 0 27 41 25 7 17 19 21 3 272
2:30 PM 14 47 20 4 19 51 8 4 30 39 29 4 15 49 19 6 340
2:45 PM 6 37 15 1 24 45 6 5 19 41 14 0 22 54 25 6 308
TOTAL: 30 165 63 9 78 172 29 9 93 146 88 13 70 146 91 19 1171
APPROACH
258 279 327 307
TOTAL
3:00 PM 6 46 21 2 15 55 10 4 36 28 21 3 17 48 15 9 318
3:15 PM 11 43 12 0 17 63 7 1 31 41 26 2 15 45 21 2 332
3:30 PM 11 44 17 2 19 70 10 3 33 31 17 3 23 46 27 5 348
3:45 PM 12 53 27 3 19 52 8 1 30 32 19 1 22 49 15 3 338
TOTAL: 40 186 77 7 70 240 35 9 130 132 83 9 77 188 78 19 1336
APPROACH
303 345 345 343
TOTAL
4:00 PM 8 48 29 2 22 70 14 3 32 35 30 0 27 59 21 4 395
4:15 PM 16 58 30 1 26 57 12 1 34 44 30 0 15 68 20 2 410
4:30 PM 14 58 27 0 25 89 14 3 42 37 23 0 24 69 24 0 446
4:45 PM 9 66 25 0 32 70 12 3 37 47 16 0 21 65 29 2 429
TOTAL: 47 230 111 3 105 286 52 10 145 163 99 0 87 261 94 8 1680
APPROACH
388 443 407 442
TOTAL
5:00 PM 12 41 32 0 40 88 9 3 45 53 17 0 17 49 25 0 428
5:15 PM 5 48 29 0 30 94 18 0 43 42 28 0 14 58 24 1 433
5:30 PM 11 61 41 1 30 83 10 1 36 43 24 0 30 63 30 1 462
5:45 PM 9 54 25 0 26 87 11 1 41 40 35 0 17 68 25 1 438
TOTAL: 37 204 127 1 126 352 48 5 165 178 104 0 78 238 104 3 1761
APPROACH
368 526 447 420
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: State Route 82 and Howe Road COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 13 3 7 1 60 158 12 12 16 7 192 1 6 233 2 12 709

7:15 AM 15 5 4 0 77 164 7 15 18 10 235 5 5 228 4 18 772
7:30 AM 13 3 7 1 74 217 23 22 22 7 208 4 11 215 6 13 806
7:45 AM 19 7 7 0 126 264 22 35 20 8 179 1 7 173 6 12 838
TOTAL: 60 18 25 2 337 803 64 84 76 32 814 11 29 849 18 55 3125
APPROACH
103 1204 922 896
TOTAL
8:00 AM 23 7 8 0 93 188 24 15 19 8 138 0 7 173 7 21 695

8:15 AM 20 3 10 1 98 213 22 25 25 11 139 1 9 178 6 22 734
8:30 AM 23 10 10 2 69 186 22 22 24 10 140 3 13 172 3 15 682
8:45 AM 12 5 13 1 88 235 21 19 25 11 133 3 13 173 4 12 733
TOTAL: 78 25 41 4 348 822 89 81 93 40 550 7 42 696 20 70 2844
APPROACH
144 1259 683 758
TOTAL
9:00 AM 14 10 12 2 85 174 26 22 27 7 121 4 16 157 5 18 654

9:15 AM 23 9 12 1 78 187 30 33 28 11 124 1 14 167 11 12 694
9:30 AM 19 11 9 2 72 185 37 16 17 14 119 4 14 157 7 17 661
9:45 AM 25 8 6 0 68 192 63 21 19 28 97 1 31 125 3 18 665
TOTAL: 81 38 39 5 303 738 156 92 91 60 461 10 75 606 26 65 2674
APPROACH
158 1197 612 707
TOTAL
10:00 AM 36 8 13 1 60 163 74 18 14 40 72 1 47 151 7 17 685
10:15 AM 43 7 20 2 55 178 73 30 22 26 82 1 36 185 9 17 736
10:30 AM 35 24 25 2 68 183 66 14 17 29 94 5 32 177 18 15 768
10:45 AM 47 26 30 0 66 177 98 12 20 39 92 0 47 144 6 14 792
TOTAL: 161 65 88 5 249 701 311 74 73 134 340 1 162 657 40 63 2981
APPROACH
314 1261 547 859
TOTAL
11:00 AM 61 13 34 0 63 176 68 13 19 24 96 1 52 175 7 21 788

11:15 AM 53 17 26 1 80 159 61 19 21 35 97 4 52 162 0 22 763
11:30 AM 58 23 34 2 59 207 83 18 11 32 90 2 40 219 7 15 863
11:45 AM 56 18 39 1 66 161 78 17 18 45 91 2 56 148 12 17 788
TOTAL: 228 71 133 4 268 703 290 67 69 136 374 9 200 704 26 75 3202
APPROACH
432 1261 579 930
TOTAL
12:00 PM 45 18 43 0 97 175 80 17 19 30 83 0 53 228 5 18 876

12:15 PM 46 25 40 1 48 183 51 14 22 45 104 2 44 214 10 22 832
12:30 PM 61 39 40 2 74 169 58 16 27 35 98 1 52 194 9 16 856
12:45 PM 69 31 46 1 66 178 58 13 31 26 92 3 67 196 11 11 871
TOTAL: 221 113 169 4 285 705 247 60 99 136 377 6 216 832 35 67 3435
APPROACH
503 1237 612 1083
TOTAL
1:00 PM 57 30 53 5 83 195 53 20 13 24 95 3 50 227 12 16 892

1:15 PM 46 28 36 0 112 209 46 29 25 33 91 5 52 209 8 18 895
1:30 PM 66 37 42 1 68 186 45 22 18 23 87 4 53 220 10 21 855
1:45 PM 40 22 46 1 98 195 54 18 28 23 93 0 51 209 12 12 871
TOTAL: 209 117 177 7 361 785 198 89 84 103 366 12 206 865 42 67 3513
APPROACH
503 1344 553 1113
TOTAL
2:00 PM 62 26 41 0 88 194 35 18 24 27 115 0 38 207 12 21 869
2:15 PM 63 29 44 0 88 164 47 10 20 26 127 2 35 233 6 12 882
2:30 PM 47 25 40 0 104 200 34 17 27 23 112 6 43 283 6 20 944
2:45 PM 64 19 34 0 87 180 33 15 28 35 129 3 35 248 9 11 901
TOTAL: 236 99 159 0 367 738 149 60 99 111 483 11 151 971 33 64 3596
APPROACH
494 1254 693 1155
TOTAL
3:00 PM 69 24 44 0 107 194 68 12 34 26 136 0 49 239 5 14 995

3:15 PM 77 24 37 0 105 243 67 14 15 29 124 3 54 237 8 19 1020
3:30 PM 53 26 40 0 142 243 70 13 13 25 141 2 37 237 9 13 1036
3:45 PM 65 27 45 1 120 225 68 7 26 35 118 1 50 238 13 10 1030
TOTAL: 264 101 166 1 474 905 273 46 88 115 519 6 190 951 35 56 4081
APPROACH
531 1652 722 1176
TOTAL
4:00 PM 84 27 39 1 120 250 55 13 21 18 106 3 51 251 6 14 1028

4:15 PM 77 31 41 0 139 246 76 18 29 29 147 0 47 247 4 11 1113
4:30 PM 80 23 38 0 200 333 82 10 36 33 148 4 43 292 5 13 1313
4:45 PM 59 20 44 1 198 349 92 6 26 28 112 2 35 323 6 8 1292
TOTAL: 300 101 162 2 657 1178 305 47 112 108 513 9 176 1113 21 46 4746
APPROACH
563 2140 733 1310
TOTAL
5:00 PM 72 29 32 2 196 297 109 6 26 30 131 0 51 343 12 5 1328

5:15 PM 58 26 42 0 206 329 98 5 26 36 156 2 39 342 5 2 1363
5:30 PM 60 29 44 0 157 261 73 8 19 37 131 0 31 225 11 7 1078
5:45 PM 52 22 42 0 135 261 86 11 23 46 91 3 42 239 11 7 1050
TOTAL: 242 106 160 2 694 1148 366 30 94 149 509 5 163 1149 39 21 4819
APPROACH
508 2208 752 1351
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: State Route 82 and I71 Northbound Ramps COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 270 173 17 28 0 12 2 130 353 13 966

7:15 AM 302 179 19 49 0 25 6 147 413 20 1115
7:30 AM 326 185 18 83 0 33 7 126 399 13 1152
7:45 AM 330 187 26 65 0 57 9 189 316 10 1144
TOTAL: 1228 724 80 225 0 127 24 592 1481 56 4377
APPROACH
1952 352 2073
TOTAL
8:00 AM 240 131 12 46 0 37 4 156 247 14 857

8:15 AM 248 119 18 68 0 28 7 166 214 25 843
8:30 AM 284 162 20 60 0 26 6 159 232 17 923
8:45 AM 271 119 20 59 0 27 3 130 219 19 825
TOTAL: 1043 531 70 233 0 118 20 611 912 75 3448
APPROACH
1574 351 1523
TOTAL
9:00 AM 286 161 30 59 0 24 7 147 187 18 864

9:15 AM 270 123 21 51 0 21 7 132 187 17 784
9:30 AM 251 99 12 56 0 15 6 126 178 18 725
9:45 AM 245 85 18 61 0 15 4 138 145 20 689
TOTAL: 1052 468 81 227 0 75 24 543 697 73 3062
APPROACH
1520 302 1240
TOTAL
10:00 AM 241 98 20 53 0 17 20 145 153 31 707
10:15 AM 229 76 12 61 0 18 12 179 150 19 713
10:30 AM 219 76 9 58 0 11 9 148 160 23 672
10:45 AM 256 74 16 66 0 13 16 159 156 20 724
TOTAL: 945 324 57 238 0 59 57 631 619 93 2816
APPROACH
1269 297 1250
TOTAL
11:00 AM 196 67 12 74 0 10 5 165 172 23 684

11:15 AM 226 69 12 66 0 15 1 171 174 21 721
11:30 AM 291 99 20 54 0 17 3 196 182 19 839
11:45 AM 273 93 25 81 0 22 3 163 153 21 785
TOTAL: 986 328 69 275 0 64 12 695 681 84 3029
APPROACH
1314 339 1376
TOTAL
12:00 PM 222 78 11 70 0 15 4 213 167 19 765

12:15 PM 212 63 8 49 0 13 6 199 186 27 722
12:30 PM 236 72 12 73 0 18 3 223 173 21 795
12:45 PM 247 77 20 82 0 22 4 215 158 17 801
TOTAL: 917 290 51 274 0 68 17 850 684 84 3083
APPROACH
1207 342 1534
TOTAL
1:00 PM 237 66 14 78 0 17 6 197 168 19 763

1:15 PM 239 73 14 59 0 11 11 191 166 14 739
1:30 PM 232 76 19 72 0 13 5 224 156 20 773
1:45 PM 231 75 17 74 0 22 4 213 181 14 796
TOTAL: 939 290 64 283 0 63 26 825 671 67 3071
APPROACH
1229 346 1496
TOTAL
2:00 PM 225 73 8 61 0 24 6 232 189 19 804
2:15 PM 234 73 9 56 0 35 9 232 198 18 828
2:30 PM 215 71 13 72 0 24 2 281 206 27 869
2:45 PM 249 80 25 48 0 26 5 282 165 10 850
TOTAL: 923 297 55 237 0 109 22 1027 758 74 3351
APPROACH
1220 346 1785
TOTAL
3:00 PM 255 89 16 78 0 36 1 284 203 14 945

3:15 PM 255 94 12 80 0 23 5 284 200 23 936
3:30 PM 258 105 13 71 0 33 4 291 214 14 972
3:45 PM 281 110 11 66 0 26 7 316 266 14 1065
TOTAL: 1049 398 52 295 0 118 17 1175 883 65 3918
APPROACH
1447 413 2058
TOTAL
4:00 PM 265 117 7 66 0 37 7 309 250 17 1044

4:15 PM 280 104 12 75 0 36 2 299 295 13 1089
4:30 PM 283 119 10 93 0 31 7 320 270 16 1116
4:45 PM 346 145 15 78 0 35 3 329 249 8 1182
TOTAL: 1174 485 44 312 0 139 19 1257 1064 54 4431
APPROACH
1659 451 2321
TOTAL
5:00 PM 287 107 18 76 0 36 1 373 287 9 1166

5:15 PM 306 124 7 69 0 58 1 364 295 8 1216
5:30 PM 252 101 6 96 0 45 2 307 234 17 1035
5:45 PM 272 86 8 82 0 31 3 306 200 10 977
TOTAL: 1117 418 39 323 0 170 7 1350 1016 44 4394
APPROACH
1535 493 2366
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: State Route 82 and I71 Southbound Ramps COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 130 7 20 96 8 70 0 376 36 9 728

7:15 AM 152 14 30 136 9 69 5 370 36 26 793
7:30 AM 203 11 34 196 15 72 4 361 39 8 905
7:45 AM 244 18 25 191 10 85 3 344 42 11 931
TOTAL: 729 50 109 619 42 296 12 1451 153 54 3357
APPROACH
729 728 296 1604
TOTAL
8:00 AM 191 8 19 136 6 95 5 308 50 17 799

8:15 AM 207 18 16 181 9 87 6 293 47 25 831
8:30 AM 200 9 24 158 12 88 5 303 56 16 829
8:45 AM 184 6 19 192 13 58 4 291 39 18 783
TOTAL: 782 41 78 667 40 328 20 1195 192 76 3242
APPROACH
782 745 328 1387
TOTAL
9:00 AM 154 15 18 166 14 69 3 265 32 19 704

9:15 AM 171 13 10 188 13 53 5 266 38 13 726
9:30 AM 164 12 19 189 9 53 2 251 44 22 720
9:45 AM 211 17 12 209 8 56 8 227 40 16 755
TOTAL: 700 57 59 752 44 231 18 1009 154 70 2905
APPROACH
700 811 231 1163
TOTAL
10:00 AM 153 10 18 178 11 66 10 232 37 24 684
10:15 AM 156 13 11 203 12 53 6 276 41 17 740
10:30 AM 167 5 22 179 8 55 6 253 48 17 724
10:45 AM 214 11 15 233 6 45 2 270 56 20 833
TOTAL: 690 39 66 793 37 219 9 1031 182 78 2981
APPROACH
690 859 219 1213
TOTAL
11:00 AM 160 11 12 191 10 65 9 272 62 21 762

11:15 AM 189 12 14 209 5 43 5 302 58 20 815
11:30 AM 221 10 17 229 11 60 6 318 47 17 892
11:45 AM 210 14 13 248 11 38 3 278 60 26 847
TOTAL: 780 47 56 877 37 206 23 1170 227 84 3316
APPROACH
780 933 206 1397
TOTAL
12:00 PM 219 14 22 192 5 72 7 308 64 17 877

12:15 PM 242 10 15 183 7 67 7 318 59 26 884
12:30 PM 201 10 24 213 5 63 6 333 64 20 898
12:45 PM 229 7 12 240 13 57 5 316 65 17 919
TOTAL: 891 41 73 828 30 259 25 1275 252 80 3578
APPROACH
891 901 259 1527
TOTAL
1:00 PM 216 8 18 231 13 73 8 292 75 17 905

1:15 PM 213 11 14 211 22 60 3 297 87 18 882
1:30 PM 208 13 13 215 17 67 2 313 69 25 885
1:45 PM 242 10 14 216 17 78 4 316 49 12 915
TOTAL: 879 42 59 873 69 278 17 1218 280 72 3587
APPROACH
879 932 278 1498
TOTAL
2:00 PM 209 9 17 196 8 63 6 358 62 23 905
2:15 PM 241 5 14 203 11 82 7 348 71 16 959
2:30 PM 279 7 23 192 8 100 8 387 55 21 1036
2:45 PM 256 8 15 202 14 107 2 340 75 11 995
TOTAL: 985 29 69 793 41 352 23 1433 263 71 3895
APPROACH
985 862 352 1696
TOTAL
3:00 PM 247 5 27 217 11 117 3 370 57 15 1035

3:15 PM 265 2 20 226 9 106 5 378 54 19 1049
3:30 PM 331 9 30 194 8 123 4 382 71 12 1131
3:45 PM 334 3 16 221 12 143 6 439 63 12 1216
TOTAL: 1177 19 93 858 40 489 18 1569 245 58 4431
APPROACH
1177 951 489 1814
TOTAL
4:00 PM 365 6 27 187 5 155 5 404 104 19 1242

4:15 PM 380 11 23 228 8 135 4 459 83 13 1308
4:30 PM 348 3 29 221 8 149 6 445 95 11 1287
4:45 PM 386 2 26 256 7 154 3 421 94 6 1337
TOTAL: 1479 22 105 892 28 593 18 1729 376 49 5174
APPROACH
1479 997 593 2105
TOTAL
5:00 PM 375 1 22 238 8 146 6 504 105 7 1390

5:15 PM 373 7 24 246 2 150 5 492 96 4 1381
5:30 PM 375 5 26 221 4 151 9 390 82 10 1245
5:45 PM 386 6 22 246 5 128 5 378 61 8 1221
TOTAL: 1509 19 94 951 19 575 25 1764 344 29 5237
APPROACH
1509 1045 575 2108
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville/North Royalton
STREETS: State Route 82 and West 130th Street COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 5 15 16 0 10 92 2 7 44 30 10 7 12 104 18 6 358

7:15 AM 2 22 28 2 13 153 9 12 59 36 13 1 15 97 34 9 481
7:30 AM 4 24 31 2 19 188 14 17 46 51 12 3 12 81 40 4 522
7:45 AM 16 56 45 5 18 138 8 5 45 37 16 2 26 106 30 8 541
TOTAL: 27 117 120 9 60 571 33 41 194 154 51 13 65 388 122 27 1902
APPROACH
264 664 399 575
TOTAL
8:00 AM 13 53 42 2 10 130 7 9 52 30 15 2 16 101 19 9 488

8:15 AM 12 30 38 3 9 120 5 12 50 31 23 5 21 83 26 8 448
8:30 AM 13 29 37 5 13 145 8 12 35 46 29 5 13 65 23 7 456
8:45 AM 11 52 38 5 20 146 7 13 33 45 25 3 23 77 21 6 498
TOTAL: 49 164 155 15 52 541 27 46 170 152 92 15 73 326 89 30 1890
APPROACH
368 620 414 488
TOTAL
9:00 AM 14 29 42 5 17 133 11 10 48 43 9 3 18 98 18 9 480

9:15 AM 12 24 41 5 11 126 5 10 47 31 6 3 12 73 23 8 411
9:30 AM 13 35 40 4 12 132 7 13 37 30 5 0 14 63 15 2 403
9:45 AM 11 41 43 5 9 127 4 8 29 32 12 4 17 65 18 11 408
TOTAL: 50 129 166 19 49 518 27 41 161 136 32 10 61 299 74 30 1702
APPROACH
345 594 329 434
TOTAL
10:00 AM 10 29 41 7 8 121 2 9 40 17 9 5 13 77 17 10 384
10:15 AM 14 33 37 5 9 91 7 8 39 33 13 1 20 73 19 10 388
10:30 AM 15 29 42 5 8 123 10 9 36 32 8 3 24 80 14 9 421
10:45 AM 15 33 24 5 3 135 12 6 41 43 9 4 27 77 23 7 442
TOTAL: 54 124 144 22 28 470 31 32 156 125 39 13 84 307 73 36 1635
APPROACH
322 529 320 464
TOTAL
11:00 AM 13 33 47 4 9 100 3 6 33 29 10 2 16 89 21 9 403

11:15 AM 18 38 37 7 2 100 6 8 32 34 13 3 18 91 21 7 410
11:30 AM 12 38 42 14 15 138 9 8 26 26 5 0 20 81 20 3 432
11:45 AM 17 40 33 6 17 119 13 12 44 36 12 3 27 99 19 10 476
TOTAL: 60 149 159 31 43 457 31 34 135 125 40 8 81 360 81 29 1721
APPROACH
368 531 300 522
TOTAL
12:00 PM 10 51 28 4 14 100 6 5 23 44 12 2 34 96 24 8 442

12:15 PM 21 55 38 8 10 107 5 6 25 44 8 2 23 105 17 10 458
12:30 PM 18 35 37 3 8 142 9 9 34 30 12 0 13 109 27 9 474
12:45 PM 14 37 30 5 17 86 5 7 36 38 13 3 22 86 20 4 404
TOTAL: 63 178 133 20 49 435 25 27 118 156 45 7 92 396 88 31 1778
APPROACH
374 509 319 576
TOTAL
1:00 PM 17 54 56 8 12 125 3 8 31 31 10 2 22 96 24 13 481

1:15 PM 20 49 48 4 13 117 4 7 31 33 8 1 21 112 29 8 485
1:30 PM 19 54 41 10 16 111 10 14 27 22 7 1 25 100 15 5 447
1:45 PM 18 45 42 6 13 108 3 10 39 60 8 3 36 87 30 3 489
TOTAL: 74 202 187 28 54 461 20 39 128 146 33 7 104 395 98 29 1902
APPROACH
463 535 307 597
TOTAL
2:00 PM 12 50 37 4 8 109 11 6 26 32 8 0 38 124 24 5 479
2:15 PM 29 62 39 5 16 115 9 8 40 34 12 5 37 107 27 10 527
2:30 PM 27 42 34 6 13 132 7 9 30 38 15 2 47 126 26 14 537
2:45 PM 19 62 41 3 13 125 9 19 31 43 17 3 47 114 32 5 553
TOTAL: 87 216 151 18 50 481 36 42 127 147 52 10 169 471 109 34 2096
APPROACH
454 567 326 749
TOTAL
3:00 PM 25 57 40 6 22 142 10 7 31 31 11 1 32 120 28 5 549

3:15 PM 26 59 38 7 19 142 12 12 34 43 10 1 31 133 24 9 571
3:30 PM 16 67 39 4 50 89 5 2 38 33 16 5 37 91 24 2 505
3:45 PM 22 71 48 6 34 93 3 2 30 52 25 4 36 109 31 5 554
TOTAL: 89 254 165 23 125 466 30 23 133 159 62 11 136 453 107 21 2179
APPROACH
508 621 354 696
TOTAL
4:00 PM 28 66 48 4 23 115 10 2 39 33 17 5 44 109 22 5 554

4:15 PM 31 71 41 9 28 139 9 8 39 43 14 1 45 136 47 3 643
4:30 PM 24 57 37 3 23 176 5 2 50 40 14 2 45 138 34 12 643
4:45 PM 25 68 38 4 33 175 15 7 48 48 21 1 37 144 35 3 687
TOTAL: 108 262 164 20 107 605 39 19 176 164 66 9 171 527 138 23 2527
APPROACH
534 751 406 836
TOTAL
5:00 PM 24 81 39 1 30 158 8 6 43 40 18 3 30 136 34 5 641

5:15 PM 31 67 31 1 22 114 8 2 43 59 28 2 33 122 38 2 596
5:30 PM 13 56 27 0 28 133 12 3 31 38 20 0 38 155 46 6 597
5:45 PM 15 42 30 2 18 155 5 1 33 48 26 3 29 140 50 3 591
TOTAL: 83 246 127 4 98 560 33 12 150 185 92 8 130 553 168 16 2425
APPROACH
456 691 427 851
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 72 68 8 34 33 5 134 224 10 565

7:15 AM 52 72 11 37 48 5 154 214 16 577
7:30 AM 76 82 4 58 55 4 147 214 8 632
7:45 AM 68 51 9 63 51 5 191 212 6 636
TOTAL: 268 273 32 192 187 19 626 864 40 2410
APPROACH
541 379 1490
TOTAL
8:00 AM 68 47 10 42 31 2 154 111 9 453

8:15 AM 80 53 7 57 42 9 143 111 9 486
8:30 AM 86 73 6 53 52 8 132 138 10 534
8:45 AM 100 51 15 62 33 8 131 106 15 483
TOTAL: 334 224 38 214 158 27 560 466 43 1956
APPROACH
558 372 1026
TOTAL
9:00 AM 98 52 8 47 35 14 108 84 16 424

9:15 AM 90 49 11 38 21 5 127 84 17 409
9:30 AM 106 53 12 48 18 6 94 99 13 418
9:45 AM 84 37 14 40 35 8 120 70 21 386
TOTAL: 378 191 45 173 109 33 449 337 67 1637
APPROACH
569 282 786
TOTAL
10:00 AM 88 56 18 50 25 11 100 75 8 394
10:15 AM 96 37 14 50 21 6 125 82 9 411
10:30 AM 93 45 18 43 22 10 101 90 14 394
10:45 AM 105 43 15 32 19 6 119 83 9 401
TOTAL: 382 181 65 175 87 33 445 330 40 1600
APPROACH
563 262 775
TOTAL
11:00 AM 102 55 13 32 31 6 87 68 16 375

11:15 AM 106 42 8 40 23 5 115 64 19 390
11:30 AM 134 51 8 32 17 8 117 63 10 414
11:45 AM 142 42 5 45 15 6 115 60 15 419
TOTAL: 484 190 34 149 86 25 434 255 60 1598
APPROACH
674 235 689
TOTAL
12:00 PM 177 46 6 57 20 8 150 59 16 509

12:15 PM 126 38 7 50 10 6 159 84 15 467
12:30 PM 128 41 7 48 19 5 179 43 12 458
12:45 PM 114 37 5 49 25 6 170 65 13 460
TOTAL: 545 162 25 204 74 25 658 251 56 1894
APPROACH
707 278 909
TOTAL
1:00 PM 154 41 13 44 15 8 141 63 12 458

1:15 PM 143 50 13 42 20 9 168 70 13 493
1:30 PM 124 54 5 47 25 10 151 73 9 474
1:45 PM 128 41 7 45 20 6 134 48 7 416
TOTAL: 549 186 38 178 80 33 594 254 41 1841
APPROACH
735 258 848
TOTAL
2:00 PM 136 40 11 61 24 11 129 82 15 472
2:15 PM 107 47 5 54 20 4 151 95 16 474
2:30 PM 127 63 3 52 21 6 151 63 16 477
2:45 PM 120 53 5 65 35 7 142 61 17 476
TOTAL: 490 203 24 232 100 28 573 301 64 1899
APPROACH
693 332 874
TOTAL
3:00 PM 146 75 3 51 26 7 129 99 16 526

3:15 PM 136 55 5 54 30 6 156 80 11 511
3:30 PM 150 88 5 103 30 8 137 89 14 597
3:45 PM 125 75 7 98 30 6 132 83 6 543
TOTAL: 557 293 20 306 116 27 554 351 47 2177
APPROACH
850 422 905
TOTAL
4:00 PM 196 78 5 69 35 5 134 84 11 596

4:15 PM 169 54 8 76 35 5 161 80 9 575
4:30 PM 177 110 9 95 31 2 132 116 9 661
4:45 PM 154 55 6 81 27 6 123 122 9 562
TOTAL: 696 297 28 321 128 18 550 402 38 2394
APPROACH
993 449 952
TOTAL
5:00 PM 191 92 7 100 25 2 137 130 6 675

5:15 PM 162 57 2 96 35 2 119 131 6 600
5:30 PM 154 50 5 84 22 2 110 95 2 515
5:45 PM 125 54 0 80 23 4 136 73 6 491
TOTAL: 632 253 14 360 105 10 502 429 20 2281
APPROACH
885 465 931
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
START FROM: N FROM: E SLIP LANE FROM I-71 SB FROM: W TOTALS

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 72 0 6 6 18 71 9 68 7 302 71 9 608

7:15 AM 64 0 15 8 15 68 11 59 1 318 95 16 634
7:30 AM 56 0 22 5 25 111 6 63 4 343 91 6 711
7:45 AM 73 0 13 1 21 103 14 76 2 326 102 17 714
TOTAL: 265 0 56 20 79 353 40 266 14 1289 359 48 2667
APPROACH
321 432 266 1648
TOTAL
8:00 AM 58 0 13 2 17 93 6 56 4 207 90 11 534

8:15 AM 48 0 20 3 19 118 8 55 6 206 83 9 549
8:30 AM 46 0 17 2 14 125 5 55 2 224 92 15 573
8:45 AM 46 0 24 7 20 142 17 56 2 191 89 13 568
TOTAL: 198 0 74 14 70 478 36 222 14 828 354 48 2224
APPROACH
272 548 222 1182
TOTAL
9:00 AM 39 0 14 6 13 132 11 67 8 153 58 16 476

9:15 AM 36 0 15 5 20 108 13 55 2 175 78 19 487
9:30 AM 37 0 12 4 21 133 11 66 5 156 59 10 484
9:45 AM 40 1 24 9 18 106 13 64 3 150 56 21 459
TOTAL: 152 1 65 24 72 479 48 252 18 634 251 66 1906
APPROACH
218 551 252 885
TOTAL
10:00 AM 34 1 12 8 19 119 17 37 4 141 61 7 424
10:15 AM 42 1 19 5 16 130 11 57 6 165 47 10 477
10:30 AM 28 0 7 3 19 117 17 53 4 163 51 19 438
10:45 AM 36 0 16 0 23 114 10 53 8 166 46 11 454
TOTAL: 140 2 54 16 77 480 55 200 22 635 205 47 1793
APPROACH
196 557 200 840
TOTAL
11:00 AM 24 0 19 7 17 117 9 63 5 131 69 18 440

11:15 AM 29 0 14 5 21 125 7 61 5 150 49 20 449
11:30 AM 34 0 27 6 14 152 9 65 2 146 69 8 507
11:45 AM 18 0 25 4 22 165 8 70 5 157 56 15 513
TOTAL: 105 0 85 22 74 559 33 259 17 584 243 61 1909
APPROACH
190 633 259 827
TOTAL
12:00 PM 35 0 24 8 20 214 10 76 9 174 65 18 608

12:15 PM 42 0 19 5 12 164 5 67 5 201 55 16 560
12:30 PM 36 0 20 6 16 160 6 59 2 186 75 14 552
12:45 PM 32 0 20 8 17 146 6 75 7 203 79 10 572
TOTAL: 145 0 83 27 65 684 27 277 23 764 274 58 2292
APPROACH
228 749 277 1038
TOTAL
1:00 PM 30 0 21 1 28 170 13 54 1 174 61 16 538

1:15 PM 35 0 26 4 25 160 11 63 5 203 55 11 567
1:30 PM 39 0 18 6 27 144 9 62 3 185 62 10 537
1:45 PM 45 0 28 3 25 148 8 68 3 137 67 8 518
TOTAL: 149 0 93 14 105 622 41 247 12 699 245 45 2160
APPROACH
242 727 247 944
TOTAL
2:00 PM 34 0 27 3 29 168 14 72 2 177 55 13 562
2:15 PM 30 1 43 5 11 150 5 72 1 216 73 13 596
2:30 PM 48 1 31 4 20 159 6 95 6 166 78 19 598
2:45 PM 44 1 44 12 16 169 4 80 1 159 72 8 585
TOTAL: 156 3 145 24 76 646 29 319 10 718 278 53 2341
APPROACH
304 722 319 996
TOTAL
3:00 PM 35 0 52 4 33 164 7 70 2 193 85 19 632

3:15 PM 61 0 59 6 23 167 6 112 1 175 80 11 677
3:30 PM 61 0 70 4 27 226 3 90 3 165 68 15 707
3:45 PM 54 0 74 3 26 197 7 95 2 161 73 8 680
TOTAL: 211 0 255 17 109 754 23 367 8 694 306 53 2696
APPROACH
466 863 367 1000
TOTAL
4:00 PM 53 0 54 8 41 224 5 90 3 165 93 8 720

4:15 PM 54 0 51 4 45 200 6 99 1 187 81 5 717
4:30 PM 39 1 66 6 42 221 4 119 2 196 85 8 769
4:45 PM 43 0 67 7 38 191 7 77 0 194 70 4 680
TOTAL: 189 1 238 25 166 836 22 385 6 742 329 25 2886
APPROACH
428 1002 385 1071
TOTAL
5:00 PM 43 0 63 3 51 213 4 57 1 192 79 1 698

5:15 PM 41 0 55 1 45 211 3 87 0 195 63 3 697
5:30 PM 35 0 74 0 27 211 3 98 1 170 74 2 689
5:45 PM 38 0 61 2 23 182 3 101 0 171 53 5 629
TOTAL: 157 0 253 6 146 817 13 343 2 728 269 11 2713
APPROACH
410 963 343 997
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: State Route 303 and North Carpenter Road COUNT DATE: 10/18/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 70 7 110 7 5 144 8 10 0 5 9 1 16 177 1 7 552

7:15 AM 81 10 65 0 5 112 17 12 8 7 10 1 50 234 0 23 599
7:30 AM 80 7 28 3 9 141 26 7 4 3 5 0 21 188 2 7 514
7:45 AM 71 13 44 3 7 162 29 7 10 10 4 0 24 196 4 14 574
TOTAL: 302 37 247 13 26 559 80 36 22 25 28 2 111 795 7 51 2239
APPROACH
586 665 75 913
TOTAL
8:00 AM 57 6 46 1 11 134 24 7 2 4 10 0 30 184 2 7 510

8:15 AM 39 12 32 1 12 130 20 10 4 6 3 0 24 195 3 10 480
8:30 AM 62 6 25 5 15 125 26 7 6 13 14 1 18 171 3 10 484
8:45 AM 58 15 32 3 13 151 30 8 5 7 9 0 32 174 3 14 529
TOTAL: 216 39 135 10 51 540 100 32 17 30 36 1 104 724 11 41 2003
APPROACH
390 691 83 839
TOTAL
9:00 AM 45 11 31 0 12 134 25 11 7 5 11 1 18 159 2 9 460

9:15 AM 46 13 19 4 13 122 17 9 9 12 16 0 23 144 7 7 441
9:30 AM 37 11 38 2 13 143 17 8 13 7 13 1 17 137 7 7 453
9:45 AM 32 16 31 0 14 149 17 9 6 16 16 1 25 134 6 13 462
TOTAL: 160 51 119 6 52 548 76 37 35 40 56 3 83 574 22 36 1816
APPROACH
330 676 131 679
TOTAL
10:00 AM 31 15 28 0 17 111 17 12 7 13 4 0 27 133 10 7 413
10:15 AM 37 14 30 1 20 141 16 9 21 14 12 1 25 143 8 7 481
10:30 AM 24 10 29 1 16 163 17 15 13 14 18 0 22 117 13 14 456
10:45 AM 34 25 31 2 16 137 12 9 18 17 13 1 23 117 11 10 454
TOTAL: 126 64 118 4 69 552 62 45 59 58 47 2 97 510 42 38 1804
APPROACH
308 683 164 649
TOTAL
11:00 AM 28 20 24 2 19 133 27 15 18 26 10 0 42 135 11 16 493

11:15 AM 33 25 42 0 16 121 17 6 19 33 16 0 35 121 14 16 492
11:30 AM 24 28 26 1 31 135 27 9 23 16 13 0 26 122 22 8 493
11:45 AM 31 30 36 1 28 133 20 5 21 32 25 0 40 115 8 6 519
TOTAL: 116 103 128 4 94 522 91 35 81 107 64 0 143 493 55 46 1997
APPROACH
347 707 252 691
TOTAL
12:00 PM 27 23 27 0 24 215 26 13 21 19 15 2 33 158 13 12 601

12:15 PM 41 36 40 0 31 151 23 12 32 29 28 1 42 138 16 10 607
12:30 PM 33 25 35 1 40 158 32 3 32 26 29 0 37 130 18 8 595
12:45 PM 38 21 32 1 34 189 26 12 26 21 17 0 44 165 13 9 626
TOTAL: 139 105 134 2 129 713 107 40 111 95 89 3 156 591 60 39 2429
APPROACH
378 949 295 807
TOTAL
1:00 PM 39 25 22 0 32 155 20 8 22 33 26 0 40 130 12 11 556

1:15 PM 40 21 39 0 41 166 19 8 28 30 26 1 35 124 19 8 588
1:30 PM 26 31 26 6 32 178 28 22 22 31 13 0 43 135 14 9 579
1:45 PM 37 23 27 0 27 179 22 9 23 28 17 0 42 125 17 3 567
TOTAL: 142 100 114 6 132 678 89 47 95 122 82 1 160 514 62 31 2290
APPROACH
356 899 299 736
TOTAL
2:00 PM 36 21 52 3 26 210 34 12 20 23 24 0 34 150 11 13 641
2:15 PM 22 11 22 0 32 185 36 8 16 31 24 0 46 173 7 14 605
2:30 PM 38 23 36 0 31 179 32 8 21 31 23 0 46 157 17 11 634
2:45 PM 41 19 41 2 32 207 34 4 16 25 21 0 40 128 20 7 624
TOTAL: 137 74 151 5 121 781 136 32 73 110 92 0 166 608 55 45 2504
APPROACH
362 1038 275 829
TOTAL
3:00 PM 43 23 25 4 37 204 51 4 18 23 25 1 55 153 18 17 675

3:15 PM 30 30 30 4 34 191 53 8 23 29 24 0 39 128 6 6 617
3:30 PM 39 17 39 4 42 243 54 3 16 31 13 0 30 110 8 8 642
3:45 PM 49 33 51 3 32 229 41 9 22 41 21 0 42 113 7 4 681
TOTAL: 161 103 145 15 145 867 199 24 79 124 83 1 166 504 39 35 2615
APPROACH
409 1211 286 709
TOTAL
4:00 PM 45 24 48 0 31 236 54 4 20 33 20 0 47 151 20 5 729

4:15 PM 33 28 25 1 39 236 59 3 22 23 17 0 49 144 12 3 687
4:30 PM 49 21 29 0 37 232 48 2 17 26 22 0 36 157 9 7 683
4:45 PM 47 39 41 0 32 234 57 1 23 36 18 0 48 140 12 2 727
TOTAL: 174 112 143 1 139 938 218 10 82 118 77 0 180 592 53 17 2826
APPROACH
429 1295 277 825
TOTAL
5:00 PM 43 31 48 0 26 236 44 7 16 36 22 0 45 166 11 2 724

5:15 PM 31 31 52 0 37 250 50 1 24 33 15 0 40 136 30 1 729
5:30 PM 44 23 38 0 37 236 62 3 29 36 19 0 45 140 16 1 725
5:45 PM 38 32 52 0 27 213 70 4 27 18 14 0 41 136 19 2 687
TOTAL: 156 117 190 0 127 935 226 15 96 123 70 0 171 578 76 6 2865
APPROACH
463 1288 289 825
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: State Route 303 and South Carpenter Road COUNT DATE: 10/18/2022
START SLIP LANE FROM-71 SB FROM: E FROM: S FROM: W TOTALS

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 68 7 14 76 4 51 99 1 290 11 7 609

7:15 AM 59 1 22 62 11 26 79 0 343 13 12 604
7:30 AM 63 4 16 113 2 14 101 2 333 10 6 650
7:45 AM 76 2 25 113 6 24 91 2 325 7 14 661
TOTAL: 266 14 77 364 23 115 370 5 1291 41 39 2524
APPROACH
266 441 485 1332
TOTAL
8:00 AM 56 4 17 80 4 29 68 3 229 13 9 492

8:15 AM 55 6 30 103 17 10 67 0 222 7 9 494
8:30 AM 55 2 25 107 7 24 68 2 248 14 16 541
8:45 AM 56 2 34 136 15 28 61 1 219 21 12 555
TOTAL: 222 14 106 426 43 91 264 6 918 55 46 2082
APPROACH
222 532 355 973
TOTAL
9:00 AM 67 8 17 128 13 13 42 3 169 12 13 448

9:15 AM 55 2 16 104 11 12 44 1 209 15 18 455
9:30 AM 66 5 24 127 7 27 36 0 179 12 10 471
9:45 AM 64 3 26 108 10 25 37 1 169 15 20 444
TOTAL: 252 18 83 467 41 77 159 5 726 54 61 1818
APPROACH
252 550 236 780
TOTAL
10:00 AM 37 4 17 118 11 15 32 0 170 11 7 400
10:15 AM 57 6 31 109 8 23 23 0 189 16 10 448
10:30 AM 53 4 16 120 14 30 33 2 181 15 18 448
10:45 AM 53 8 24 105 6 20 32 0 180 15 11 429
TOTAL: 200 22 88 452 39 88 120 2 720 57 46 1725
APPROACH
200 540 208 777
TOTAL
11:00 AM 63 5 24 120 9 25 25 2 175 18 20 450

11:15 AM 61 5 22 112 5 24 24 1 175 24 21 442
11:30 AM 65 2 40 143 10 23 42 1 173 23 8 509
11:45 AM 70 5 29 147 11 27 34 4 179 24 11 510
TOTAL: 259 17 115 522 35 99 125 8 702 89 60 1911
APPROACH
259 637 224 791
TOTAL
12:00 PM 76 9 39 202 12 34 35 1 204 22 17 612

12:15 PM 67 5 19 157 5 25 23 2 233 37 14 561
12:30 PM 59 2 22 132 4 26 34 1 227 18 13 518
12:45 PM 75 7 32 103 8 28 32 0 250 29 10 549
TOTAL: 277 23 112 594 29 113 124 4 914 106 54 2240
APPROACH
277 706 237 1020
TOTAL
1:00 PM 54 1 22 156 10 29 33 2 202 23 15 519

1:15 PM 63 5 31 131 10 21 36 1 222 24 11 528
1:30 PM 62 3 32 127 7 15 38 0 209 19 10 502
1:45 PM 68 3 35 128 10 22 30 2 174 20 6 477
TOTAL: 247 12 120 542 37 87 137 5 807 86 42 2026
APPROACH
247 662 224 893
TOTAL
2:00 PM 72 2 36 133 12 32 26 0 206 34 13 539
2:15 PM 72 1 51 119 11 16 45 2 244 30 15 577
2:30 PM 95 6 34 141 5 35 33 1 211 30 19 579
2:45 PM 80 1 53 138 7 26 22 0 209 28 8 556
TOTAL: 319 10 174 531 35 109 126 3 870 122 55 2251
APPROACH
319 705 235 992
TOTAL
3:00 PM 70 2 47 163 6 22 35 0 243 38 22 618

3:15 PM 112 1 85 115 9 33 34 1 221 28 11 628
3:30 PM 90 3 86 171 3 34 27 1 206 34 16 648
3:45 PM 95 2 75 146 6 27 38 1 196 35 8 612
TOTAL: 367 8 293 595 24 116 134 3 866 135 57 2506
APPROACH
367 888 250 1001
TOTAL
4:00 PM 90 3 67 170 8 28 32 1 226 35 8 648

4:15 PM 99 1 69 161 3 25 44 1 224 25 4 647
4:30 PM 119 2 89 197 4 18 41 0 214 45 8 723
4:45 PM 77 0 86 192 5 31 38 3 217 30 6 671
TOTAL: 385 6 311 720 20 102 155 5 881 135 26 2689
APPROACH
385 1031 257 1016
TOTAL
5:00 PM 57 1 86 216 3 23 38 1 219 51 3 690

5:15 PM 87 0 82 228 2 36 37 0 206 40 4 716
5:30 PM 98 1 80 146 4 24 39 0 205 34 2 626
5:45 PM 101 0 77 142 6 31 23 1 201 34 5 609
TOTAL: 343 2 325 732 15 114 137 2 831 159 14 2641
APPROACH
343 1057 251 990
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick/Hinckley

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 23 25 51 2 3 43 13 1 12 20 7 1 36 49 14 2 296
7:15 AM 22 22 40 4 3 61 9 2 15 25 8 3 29 47 11 6 292
7:30 AM 35 42 54 3 3 71 19 1 16 21 5 4 36 57 9 8 368
7:45 AM 23 37 29 3 10 71 21 3 7 30 10 0 48 67 6 3 359
TOTAL: 103 126 174 12 19 246 62 7 50 96 30 8 149 220 40 19 1315
APPROACH
403 327 176 409
TOTAL
8:00 AM 24 25 28 2 7 54 21 1 8 19 5 3 32 50 9 3 282
8:15 AM 22 20 43 2 4 51 24 3 7 34 9 0 22 53 14 6 303
8:30 AM 27 30 47 7 5 64 11 4 13 18 6 5 28 58 8 3 315
8:45 AM 18 19 40 4 8 82 16 7 10 31 6 2 38 47 7 5 322
TOTAL: 91 94 158 15 24 251 72 15 38 102 26 10 120 208 38 17 1222
APPROACH
343 347 166 366
TOTAL
9:00 AM 17 24 57 4 10 62 12 3 12 15 8 3 34 43 8 6 302
9:15 AM 10 21 33 4 8 54 14 1 11 16 5 3 19 55 7 5 253
9:30 AM 9 24 41 8 10 64 14 4 8 16 7 5 25 39 7 6 264
9:45 AM 20 18 34 7 2 48 18 2 12 18 3 6 23 39 9 3 244
TOTAL: 56 87 165 23 30 228 58 10 43 65 23 17 101 176 31 20 1063
APPROACH
308 316 131 308
TOTAL
10:00 AM 16 22 36 6 6 59 12 5 7 15 9 5 23 46 8 5 259
10:15 AM 7 16 31 8 3 54 11 5 12 22 5 2 19 57 15 3 252
10:30 AM 11 21 27 4 8 52 12 1 14 19 5 5 30 41 8 3 248
10:45 AM 17 21 40 11 2 51 15 3 8 21 5 5 23 40 7 2 250
TOTAL: 51 80 134 29 19 216 50 14 41 77 24 17 95 184 38 13 1009
APPROACH
265 285 142 317
TOTAL
11:00 AM 14 26 49 6 5 53 11 8 8 17 10 4 28 44 15 3 280
11:15 AM 8 29 32 4 5 59 14 3 13 16 5 4 34 61 7 4 283
11:30 AM 10 21 34 3 3 64 10 3 16 27 4 2 37 40 7 4 273
11:45 AM 17 25 39 1 4 55 13 2 10 17 4 4 39 34 9 2 266
TOTAL: 49 101 154 14 17 231 48 16 47 77 23 14 138 179 38 13 1102
APPROACH
304 296 147 355
TOTAL
12:00 PM 19 17 51 3 2 64 11 3 19 19 2 4 43 51 13 5 311
12:15 PM 19 33 36 7 4 56 8 1 17 20 4 3 40 66 16 7 319
12:30 PM 18 32 34 4 4 51 19 4 18 23 2 3 44 63 8 6 316
12:45 PM 20 36 38 10 6 63 19 1 20 21 6 1 37 55 14 3 335
TOTAL: 76 118 159 24 16 234 57 9 74 83 14 11 164 235 51 21 1281
APPROACH
353 307 171 450
TOTAL
1:00 PM 12 29 48 2 8 65 15 8 7 22 3 5 42 48 14 4 313
1:15 PM 14 32 63 8 9 79 12 2 8 20 3 1 45 49 11 3 345
1:30 PM 18 34 52 3 10 63 7 4 13 22 6 3 40 77 9 5 351
1:45 PM 14 24 36 3 3 49 8 1 17 16 4 4 29 62 12 3 274
TOTAL: 58 119 199 16 30 256 42 15 45 80 16 13 156 236 46 15 1283
APPROACH
376 328 141 438
TOTAL
2:00 PM 28 29 36 7 4 62 11 3 16 14 2 1 30 55 13 3 300
2:15 PM 19 19 44 1 4 70 10 2 7 26 6 3 50 65 11 6 331
2:30 PM 20 33 46 1 5 61 16 1 9 30 6 5 42 74 7 3 349
2:45 PM 12 31 34 3 5 60 17 2 12 28 5 0 45 57 12 2 318
TOTAL: 79 112 160 12 18 253 54 8 44 98 19 9 167 251 43 14 1298
APPROACH
351 325 161 461
TOTAL
3:00 PM 26 37 50 3 7 66 18 0 14 38 7 0 44 67 12 3 386
3:15 PM 13 27 36 2 13 58 20 0 8 31 3 3 41 69 11 3 330
3:30 PM 22 33 42 1 8 77 26 3 19 37 7 2 49 69 10 4 399
3:45 PM 25 46 32 5 6 76 19 0 11 36 8 1 32 64 12 2 367
TOTAL: 86 143 160 11 34 277 83 3 52 142 25 6 166 269 45 12 1482
APPROACH
389 394 219 480
TOTAL
4:00 PM 26 59 52 3 5 55 31 2 12 32 6 4 44 62 13 3 397
4:15 PM 28 19 37 6 18 71 28 4 11 31 8 1 15 37 2 3 305
4:30 PM 29 66 28 5 5 72 25 1 6 38 5 3 41 53 12 5 380
4:45 PM 19 41 29 4 7 73 23 2 9 32 3 0 45 55 7 3 343
TOTAL: 102 185 146 18 35 271 107 9 38 133 22 8 145 207 34 14 1425
APPROACH
433 413 193 386
TOTAL
5:00 PM 23 47 46 3 15 67 28 2 17 44 10 4 26 55 6 1 384
5:15 PM 25 29 50 2 13 74 29 1 10 26 5 1 56 65 10 5 392
5:30 PM 22 37 47 3 8 73 30 1 8 24 5 0 49 50 5 0 358
5:45 PM 16 25 30 1 6 69 21 0 5 26 3 0 55 61 5 1 322
TOTAL: 86 138 173 9 42 283 108 4 40 120 23 5 186 231 26 7 1456
APPROACH
397 433 183 443
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
STREETS: US 42 and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 5 14 7 2 20 26 20 0 11 50 24 0 11 45 9 0 242
7:15 AM 7 25 3 0 19 41 20 0 14 62 35 0 15 49 6 0 296
7:30 AM 6 47 8 1 24 47 13 0 21 81 38 0 11 49 12 0 357
7:45 AM 7 45 4 0 36 62 21 0 18 77 35 0 24 51 12 1 392
TOTAL: 25 131 22 3 99 176 74 0 64 270 132 0 61 194 39 1 1287
APPROACH
178 349 466 294
TOTAL
8:00 AM 14 27 3 1 38 45 15 0 18 71 29 2 15 45 13 1 333
8:15 AM 14 33 4 2 24 30 11 1 14 81 23 1 21 42 19 0 316
8:30 AM 12 31 9 0 26 28 17 0 15 59 19 0 17 51 10 0 294
8:45 AM 5 37 8 1 44 35 20 0 10 61 31 1 13 46 15 0 325
TOTAL: 45 128 24 4 132 138 63 1 57 272 102 4 66 184 57 1 1268
APPROACH
197 333 431 307
TOTAL
9:00 AM 12 40 10 1 33 24 16 0 8 67 22 2 11 37 13 0 293
9:15 AM 10 63 8 1 25 25 15 0 6 65 23 2 6 25 13 0 284
9:30 AM 11 53 14 0 25 19 15 0 9 60 18 0 7 31 12 0 274
9:45 AM 13 56 7 2 23 13 17 1 4 70 12 1 16 26 9 0 266
TOTAL: 46 212 39 4 106 81 63 1 27 262 75 5 40 119 47 0 1117
APPROACH
297 250 364 206
TOTAL
10:00 AM 15 44 12 1 28 13 15 0 10 63 19 2 7 24 9 0 259
10:15 AM 12 56 8 1 19 23 17 2 5 69 21 2 9 25 6 0 270
10:30 AM 9 53 9 3 18 21 11 0 8 70 27 2 8 33 9 1 276
10:45 AM 10 58 10 3 32 27 15 0 9 77 21 0 11 24 11 1 305
TOTAL: 46 211 39 8 97 84 58 2 32 279 88 6 35 106 35 2 1110
APPROACH
296 239 399 176
TOTAL
11:00 AM 11 57 9 0 29 21 12 0 14 102 20 2 16 24 16 0 331

11:15 AM 9 74 15 0 22 18 13 0 11 62 19 2 4 15 13 0 275
11:30 AM 22 79 15 3 34 24 22 0 11 95 24 0 9 29 18 1 382
11:45 AM 19 79 10 2 35 26 20 1 15 80 26 3 20 24 11 0 365
TOTAL: 61 289 49 5 120 89 67 1 51 339 89 7 49 92 58 1 1353
APPROACH
399 276 479 199
TOTAL
12:00 PM 19 74 21 2 36 23 12 1 12 61 29 3 17 23 21 1 348
12:15 PM 13 75 18 0 26 24 9 0 13 88 14 1 16 35 22 1 353
12:30 PM 20 73 17 0 29 25 15 0 12 90 27 2 15 29 18 2 370
12:45 PM 21 75 13 0 36 18 24 2 12 72 20 2 14 31 17 0 353
TOTAL: 73 297 69 2 127 90 60 3 49 311 90 8 62 118 78 4 1424
APPROACH
439 277 450 258
TOTAL
1:00 PM 24 83 15 1 43 28 9 2 18 72 21 2 7 23 21 1 364
1:15 PM 20 91 11 2 32 21 18 1 13 78 25 2 9 22 11 0 351
1:30 PM 14 71 17 1 36 29 15 1 6 89 26 0 7 27 14 0 351
1:45 PM 18 92 11 2 32 27 10 1 15 79 23 7 10 24 12 0 353
TOTAL: 76 337 54 6 143 105 52 5 52 318 95 11 33 96 58 1 1419
APPROACH
467 300 465 187
TOTAL
2:00 PM 19 65 17 2 32 30 21 0 16 64 24 1 7 22 17 0 334
2:15 PM 20 86 32 1 32 25 16 2 8 78 29 0 12 28 14 0 380
2:30 PM 20 104 9 1 29 23 24 0 18 68 21 0 8 36 24 0 384
2:45 PM 19 87 11 1 40 35 23 1 15 86 27 1 15 42 16 1 416
TOTAL: 78 342 69 5 133 113 84 3 57 296 101 2 42 128 71 1 1514
APPROACH
489 330 454 241
TOTAL
3:00 PM 17 82 21 2 51 46 15 0 16 67 29 0 16 49 16 1 425
3:15 PM 15 92 18 1 41 39 21 0 20 81 25 1 10 42 25 0 429
3:30 PM 22 88 13 1 62 41 16 1 20 82 32 2 9 41 25 0 451
3:45 PM 18 113 23 0 43 42 22 1 14 89 24 0 15 37 19 0 459
TOTAL: 72 375 75 4 197 168 74 2 70 319 110 3 50 169 85 1 1764
APPROACH
522 439 499 304
TOTAL
4:00 PM 17 84 15 0 62 57 20 0 17 69 23 2 13 52 23 0 452
4:15 PM 23 96 21 0 50 54 32 0 23 82 26 1 16 58 23 1 504
4:30 PM 20 139 26 0 69 58 27 0 21 101 22 1 13 50 25 0 571
4:45 PM 21 111 24 0 69 42 24 0 16 85 32 1 9 51 22 0 506
TOTAL: 81 430 86 0 250 211 103 0 77 337 103 5 51 211 93 1 2033
APPROACH
597 564 517 355
TOTAL
5:00 PM 20 99 20 2 56 62 21 0 31 94 35 0 12 43 22 2 515
5:15 PM 27 124 20 0 59 48 25 0 23 91 36 1 11 48 30 2 542
5:30 PM 28 121 22 0 57 54 22 0 15 80 33 0 12 51 23 0 518
5:45 PM 32 108 14 0 63 66 14 0 11 96 21 0 11 30 30 0 496
TOTAL: 107 452 76 2 235 230 82 0 80 361 125 1 46 172 105 4 2071
APPROACH
635 547 566 323
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
STREETS: W 130th Street and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/4/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 9 44 14 0 13 10 16 0 6 103 19 0 42 23 8 0 307

7:15 AM 9 50 26 1 15 10 22 0 6 107 14 2 55 31 4 1 349
7:30 AM 12 67 22 2 13 10 20 1 9 109 23 2 50 41 11 0 387
7:45 AM 14 88 42 3 11 19 16 0 7 89 16 2 54 23 10 2 389
TOTAL: 44 249 104 6 52 49 74 1 28 408 72 6 201 118 33 3 1432
APPROACH
397 175 508 352
TOTAL
8:00 AM 9 54 17 1 9 16 10 1 2 88 17 2 38 23 10 0 293
8:15 AM 12 47 19 0 8 16 21 0 4 67 17 0 50 18 8 0 287
8:30 AM 15 56 23 4 7 15 17 0 4 76 16 3 44 18 9 0 300
8:45 AM 9 55 35 5 11 8 25 0 19 79 19 4 54 19 9 0 342
TOTAL: 45 212 94 10 35 55 73 1 29 310 69 9 186 78 36 0 1222
APPROACH
351 163 408 300
TOTAL
9:00 AM 9 51 28 1 5 6 14 1 5 62 4 0 33 23 9 2 249
9:15 AM 13 48 24 3 12 11 20 0 8 53 12 1 34 16 10 0 261
9:30 AM 13 38 26 1 14 18 13 1 3 57 3 2 42 17 8 3 252
9:45 AM 15 51 18 0 12 13 20 1 9 69 10 2 19 9 5 0 250
TOTAL: 50 188 96 5 43 48 67 3 25 241 29 5 128 65 32 5 1012
APPROACH
334 158 295 225
TOTAL
10:00 AM 23 48 28 3 12 12 13 2 5 47 10 2 32 4 6 0 240
10:15 AM 7 39 30 2 13 14 14 1 4 45 16 2 20 13 9 0 224
10:30 AM 11 52 25 7 16 17 17 3 6 40 4 4 28 14 7 0 237
10:45 AM 16 41 36 1 9 20 15 2 12 55 8 0 29 16 12 1 269
TOTAL: 57 180 119 13 50 63 59 8 27 187 38 8 109 47 34 1 970
APPROACH
356 172 252 190
TOTAL
11:00 AM 18 43 26 2 9 12 15 2 5 63 10 0 23 16 5 1 245
11:15 AM 16 58 26 1 2 4 20 1 5 65 13 1 22 12 5 0 248
11:30 AM 17 51 24 4 12 11 18 1 14 61 9 0 40 17 12 1 286
11:45 AM 17 69 31 0 12 19 13 1 8 61 14 1 34 19 4 2 301
TOTAL: 68 221 107 7 35 46 66 5 32 250 46 2 119 64 26 4 1080
APPROACH
396 147 328 209
TOTAL
12:00 PM 25 54 41 3 7 11 25 0 5 56 15 1 21 15 10 0 285
12:15 PM 15 47 22 1 23 15 24 0 9 48 12 0 35 12 7 0 269
12:30 PM 19 63 29 3 20 9 15 1 14 57 10 1 30 12 8 1 286
12:45 PM 21 62 31 3 19 20 19 0 6 65 13 1 27 19 13 1 315
TOTAL: 80 226 123 10 69 55 83 1 34 226 50 3 113 58 38 2 1155
APPROACH
429 207 310 209
TOTAL
1:00 PM 29 60 33 1 16 16 26 1 6 64 8 3 29 10 9 0 306
1:15 PM 19 64 33 2 13 22 23 2 8 59 16 1 20 7 8 0 292
1:30 PM 21 67 23 3 10 18 17 1 10 59 14 0 18 20 8 0 285
1:45 PM 14 53 37 2 15 15 22 0 10 56 5 1 21 14 10 0 272
TOTAL: 83 244 126 8 54 71 88 4 34 238 43 5 88 51 35 0 1155
APPROACH
453 213 315 174
TOTAL
2:00 PM 13 63 35 3 11 20 13 1 15 67 11 3 25 16 6 0 295
2:15 PM 25 63 29 2 12 16 19 0 13 58 10 1 35 25 14 0 319
2:30 PM 23 83 30 2 10 21 26 2 10 80 22 0 29 16 18 0 368
2:45 PM 26 86 48 1 13 28 20 0 20 71 16 0 32 21 14 0 395
TOTAL: 87 295 142 8 46 85 78 3 58 276 59 4 121 78 52 0 1377
APPROACH
524 209 393 251
TOTAL
3:00 PM 27 84 41 1 15 15 18 1 16 87 13 1 30 21 15 2 382
3:15 PM 29 90 49 1 27 28 18 0 13 72 4 0 23 17 13 0 383
3:30 PM 34 106 60 3 24 28 20 1 8 83 24 0 32 18 11 0 448
3:45 PM 33 106 64 0 20 33 19 1 10 61 20 1 30 20 8 0 424
TOTAL: 123 386 214 5 86 104 75 3 47 303 61 2 115 76 47 2 1637
APPROACH
723 265 411 238
TOTAL
4:00 PM 37 90 55 0 19 25 25 1 16 101 24 0 29 25 5 0 451

4:15 PM 38 114 59 1 27 43 21 0 18 105 19 0 47 24 18 1 533
4:30 PM 32 122 67 2 24 36 29 0 17 117 23 0 31 25 9 0 532
4:45 PM 30 98 71 0 30 43 18 0 17 94 10 0 41 22 10 0 484
TOTAL: 137 424 252 3 100 147 93 1 68 417 76 0 148 96 42 1 2000
APPROACH
813 340 561 286
TOTAL
5:00 PM 38 126 54 0 18 27 33 0 27 118 23 0 46 21 11 0 542

5:15 PM 27 113 60 0 38 56 35 0 18 103 14 1 48 24 12 1 548
5:30 PM 35 125 80 2 23 40 24 0 12 98 11 0 46 16 18 0 528
5:45 PM 28 107 45 0 26 44 31 0 20 77 11 1 44 22 15 0 470
TOTAL: 128 471 239 2 105 167 123 0 77 396 59 2 184 83 56 1 2088
APPROACH
838 395 532 323
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: I71 NB between 82&303 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 675 28 675

7:15 AM 899 42 899
7:30 AM 927 55 927
7:45 AM 796 50 796
TOTAL: 3297 175 3297
APPROACH
3297
TOTAL
8:00 AM 660 45 660

8:15 AM 683 51 683
8:30 AM 713 45 713
8:45 AM 573 32 573
TOTAL: 2629 173 2629
APPROACH
2629
TOTAL
9:00 AM 537 46 537

9:15 AM 508 38 508
9:30 AM 476 36 476
9:45 AM 416 26 416
TOTAL: 1937 146 1937
APPROACH
1937
TOTAL
10:00 AM 451 31 451
10:15 AM 414 47 414
10:30 AM 467 42 467
10:45 AM 380 34 380
TOTAL: 1712 24 1712
APPROACH
1712
TOTAL
11:00 AM 389 24 389

11:15 AM 354 16 354
11:30 AM 396 28 396
11:45 AM 431 36 431
TOTAL: 1570 104 1570
APPROACH
1570
TOTAL
12:00 PM 409 27 409

12:15 PM 384 15 384
12:30 PM 429 29 429
12:45 PM 416 25 416
TOTAL: 1638 96 1638
APPROACH
1638
TOTAL
1:00 PM 372 30 372

1:15 PM 403 29 403
1:30 PM 386 22 386
1:45 PM 412 30 412
TOTAL: 1573 111 1573
APPROACH
1573
TOTAL
2:00 PM 440 29 440
2:15 PM 450 27 450
2:30 PM 441 29 441
2:45 PM 431 27 431
TOTAL: 1762 112 1762
APPROACH
1762
TOTAL
3:00 PM 459 25 459

3:15 PM 510 26 510
3:30 PM 588 27 588
3:45 PM 549 26 549
TOTAL: 2106 104 2106
APPROACH
2106
TOTAL
4:00 PM 549 16 549

4:15 PM 550 18 550
4:30 PM 617 26 617
4:45 PM 638 25 638
TOTAL: 2354 85 2354
APPROACH
2354
TOTAL
5:00 PM 610 19 610

5:15 PM 573 16 573
5:30 PM 614 21 614
5:45 PM 551 15 551
TOTAL: 2348 71 2348
APPROACH
2348
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: I71 NB North of SR 82 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 1167 43 1167

7:15 AM 1449 59 1449
7:30 AM 1215 46 1215
7:45 AM 1238 63 1238
TOTAL: 5069 211 5069
APPROACH
5069
TOTAL
8:00 AM 1000 46 1000

8:15 AM 978 73 978
8:30 AM 1053 52 1053
8:45 AM 836 47 836
TOTAL: 3867 218 3867
APPROACH
3867
TOTAL
9:00 AM 796 61 796

9:15 AM 775 54 775
9:30 AM 709 56 709
9:45 AM 588 49 588
TOTAL: 2868 220 2868
APPROACH
2868
TOTAL
10:00 AM 642 55 642
10:15 AM 594 64 594
10:30 AM 651 61 651
10:45 AM 567 58 567
TOTAL: 2454 37 2454
APPROACH
2454
TOTAL
11:00 AM 540 37 540

11:15 AM 572 39 572
11:30 AM 613 38 613
11:45 AM 599 59 599
TOTAL: 2324 173 2324
APPROACH
2324
TOTAL
12:00 PM 603 38 603

12:15 PM 574 30 574
12:30 PM 616 48 616
12:45 PM 582 42 582
TOTAL: 2375 158 2375
APPROACH
2375
TOTAL
1:00 PM 540 40 540

1:15 PM 604 38 604
1:30 PM 617 39 617
1:45 PM 603 42 603
TOTAL: 2364 159 2364
APPROACH
2364
TOTAL
2:00 PM 639 50 639
2:15 PM 680 32 680
2:30 PM 670 40 670
2:45 PM 632 37 632
TOTAL: 2621 159 2621
APPROACH
2621
TOTAL
3:00 PM 679 43 679

3:15 PM 746 41 746
3:30 PM 831 36 831
3:45 PM 845 34 845
TOTAL: 3101 154 3101
APPROACH
3101
TOTAL
4:00 PM 852 23 852

4:15 PM 827 30 827
4:30 PM 917 30 917
4:45 PM 882 35 882
TOTAL: 3478 118 3478
APPROACH
3478
TOTAL
5:00 PM 901 36 901

5:15 PM 879 18 879
5:30 PM 823 25 823
5:45 PM 753 23 753
TOTAL: 3356 102 3356
APPROACH
3356
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: I71 SB between 82&303 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 378 27 378

7:15 AM 451 38 451
7:30 AM 493 24 493
7:45 AM 485 34 485
TOTAL: 1807 123 1807
APPROACH
1807
TOTAL
8:00 AM 459 42 459

8:15 AM 452 42 452
8:30 AM 463 41 463
8:45 AM 375 34 375
TOTAL: 1749 159 1749
APPROACH
1749
TOTAL
9:00 AM 346 46 346

9:15 AM 371 36 371
9:30 AM 418 54 418
9:45 AM 374 47 374
TOTAL: 1509 183 1509
APPROACH
1509
TOTAL
10:00 AM 362 36 362
10:15 AM 353 42 353
10:30 AM 360 36 360
10:45 AM 401 46 401
TOTAL: 1476 160 1476
APPROACH
1476
TOTAL
11:00 AM 387 53 387

11:15 AM 386 49 386
11:30 AM 414 41 414
11:45 AM 372 48 372
TOTAL: 1559 191 1559
APPROACH
1559
TOTAL
12:00 PM 396 44 396

12:15 PM 428 41 428
12:30 PM 440 43 440
12:45 PM 415 52 415
TOTAL: 1679 180 1679
APPROACH
1679
TOTAL
1:00 PM 458 56 458

1:15 PM 486 43 486
1:30 PM 460 35 460
1:45 PM 503 41 503
TOTAL: 1907 175 1907
APPROACH
1907
TOTAL
2:00 PM 524 41 524
2:15 PM 591 41 591
2:30 PM 572 34 572
2:45 PM 671 33 671
TOTAL: 2358 149 2358
APPROACH
2358
TOTAL
3:00 PM 595 41 595

3:15 PM 756 28 756
3:30 PM 770 41 770
3:45 PM 793 27 793
TOTAL: 2914 137 2914
APPROACH
2914
TOTAL
4:00 PM 757 26 757

4:15 PM 853 26 853
4:30 PM 835 32 835
4:45 PM 842 14 842
TOTAL: 3287 98 3287
APPROACH
3287
TOTAL
5:00 PM 814 19 814

5:15 PM 851 23 851
5:30 PM 733 16 733
5:45 PM 727 23 727
TOTAL: 3125 81 3125
APPROACH
3125
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
CITY: Brunswick

6:00 AM 0
6:15 AM 0
6:30 AM 0
6:45 AM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM 546 30 546

7:15 AM 654 38 654
7:30 AM 743 36 743
7:45 AM 746 54 746
TOTAL: 2689 158 2689
APPROACH
2689
TOTAL
8:00 AM 687 49 687

8:15 AM 684 44 684
8:30 AM 671 39 671
8:45 AM 537 42 537
TOTAL: 2579 174 2579
APPROACH
2579
TOTAL
9:00 AM 542 62 542

9:15 AM 566 72 566
9:30 AM 600 50 600
9:45 AM 570 56 570
TOTAL: 2278 240 2278
APPROACH
2278
TOTAL
10:00 AM 527 54 527
10:15 AM 519 52 519
10:30 AM 586 47 586
10:45 AM 540 54 540
TOTAL: 2172 207 2172
APPROACH
2172
TOTAL
11:00 AM 568 49 568

11:15 AM 596 54 596
11:30 AM 609 50 609
11:45 AM 565 48 565
TOTAL: 2338 201 2338
APPROACH
2338
TOTAL
12:00 PM 622 61 622

12:15 PM 644 49 644
12:30 PM 660 54 660
12:45 PM 655 60 655
TOTAL: 2581 224 2581
APPROACH
2581
TOTAL
1:00 PM 691 56 691

1:15 PM 658 49 658
1:30 PM 721 47 721
1:45 PM 777 41 777
TOTAL: 2847 193 2847
APPROACH
2847
TOTAL
2:00 PM 787 40 787
2:15 PM 872 48 872
2:30 PM 867 47 867
2:45 PM 968 41 968
TOTAL: 3494 176 3494
APPROACH
3494
TOTAL
3:00 PM 990 40 990

3:15 PM 1091 42 1091
3:30 PM 1184 41 1184
3:45 PM 1182 36 1182
TOTAL: 4447 159 4447
APPROACH
4447
TOTAL
4:00 PM 1199 27 1199

4:15 PM 1262 30 1262
4:30 PM 1298 22 1298
4:45 PM 1282 18 1282
TOTAL: 5041 97 5041
APPROACH
5041
TOTAL
5:00 PM 1238 23 1238

5:15 PM 1216 27 1216
5:30 PM 1263 28 1263
5:45 PM 1021 19 1021
TOTAL: 4738 97 4738
APPROACH
4738
TOTAL
6:00 PM 0
6:15 PM 0
6:30 PM 0
6:45 PM 0
TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
ODOT Resources
PEAK HOUR to DESIGN HOUR FACTORS
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION = 01u
(Urban Interstate)
Day Monthly Average by Day-of-Week

WEEKDAY
MON- Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Month THUR
January 1.21 1.89 1.24 1.23 1.19 1.17 1.15 1.72
February 1.18 1.79 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.15 1.10 1.64
March 1.14 1.65 1.17 1.15 1.14 1.12 1.08 1.58
April 1.11 1.59 1.14 1.12 1.09 1.09 1.05 1.55
May 1.09 1.56 1.11 1.10 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.49
June 1.09 1.53 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.07 1.05 1.50
July 1.11 1.53 1.14 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.06 1.49
August 1.10 1.50 1.13 1.11 1.09 1.07 1.04 1.47
September 1.11 1.56 1.15 1.12 1.11 1.08 1.03 1.50
October 1.10 1.53 1.14 1.11 1.10 1.07 1.03 1.50
November 1.12 1.62 1.15 1.11 1.12 1.11 1.05 1.57
December 1.14 1.71 1.16 1.15 1.12 1.11 1.09 1.58
peak hour volume * factor = design hour volume
source: year 2016, 2017, & 2018 Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) Data
PEAK HOUR to DESIGN HOUR FACTORS
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION = 03, 04, 05u
(Urban Principal Arterial, Urban Minor Arterial, & Urban Minor Collector)
Day Monthly Average by Day-of-Week

WEEKDAY
MON- Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Month THUR
January 1.20 1.72 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.17 1.15 1.56
February 1.17 1.63 1.19 1.16 1.17 1.16 1.11 1.48
March 1.15 1.57 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.13 1.11 1.45
April 1.11 1.52 1.13 1.12 1.09 1.09 1.06 1.41
May 1.08 1.44 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.35
June 1.14 1.51 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.11 1.09 1.39
July 1.16 1.54 1.19 1.17 1.15 1.15 1.13 1.44
August 1.13 1.51 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.11 1.08 1.40
September 1.12 1.53 1.15 1.11 1.12 1.09 1.04 1.40
October 1.10 1.53 1.13 1.10 1.10 1.08 1.05 1.40
November 1.13 1.56 1.16 1.12 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.48
December 1.13 1.58 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.09 1.44
peak hour volume * factor = design hour volume
source: year 2016, 2017, & 2018 Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) Data
2021 Urban Seasonal Adjustment Factors
(All Vehicles)
Group URBAN INTERSTATE (U01) Group URBAN FREEWAY EXPRESSWAY (U02)
From Year: 2021 To Year: 2021 From Year: 2021 To Year: 2021
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Jan 1.808 1.169 1.113 1.097 1.075 1.031 1.358 Jan 1.884 1.132 1.077 1.059 1.044 1.005 1.376
Feb 1.615 1.288 1.284 1.100 1.108 1.004 1.296 Feb 1.678 1.223 1.228 1.061 1.068 0.984 1.304
Mar 1.371 1.038 0.995 0.972 0.985 0.906 1.118 Mar 1.456 1.003 0.960 0.944 0.962 0.902 1.140
Apr 1.289 0.978 0.951 0.955 0.936 0.871 1.112 Apr 1.397 0.959 0.918 0.928 0.927 0.876 1.142
May 1.224 0.974 0.942 0.921 0.883 0.847 1.048 May 1.312 0.951 0.911 0.899 0.871 0.855 1.082
Jun 1.155 0.939 0.907 0.903 0.870 0.835 1.029 Jun 1.252 0.935 0.898 0.897 0.877 0.846 1.071
Jul 1.175 0.931 0.908 0.884 0.862 0.817 1.020 Jul 1.291 0.927 0.900 0.881 0.873 0.838 1.086
Aug 1.175 0.938 0.917 0.896 0.872 0.827 1.022 Aug 1.286 0.928 0.897 0.887 0.871 0.833 1.061
Sep 1.229 0.954 0.935 0.926 0.881 0.828 1.057 Sep 1.314 0.929 0.905 0.902 0.865 0.824 1.086
Oct 1.237 0.961 0.924 0.905 0.887 0.841 1.054 Oct 1.352 0.937 0.897 0.881 0.871 0.843 1.097
Nov 1.351 0.970 0.929 0.926 0.916 0.857 1.104 Nov 1.480 0.948 0.909 0.898 0.900 0.853 1.147
Dec 1.332 0.987 0.947 0.937 0.923 0.877 1.128 Dec 1.435 0.956 0.926 0.918 0.901 0.866 1.162
Group URBAN OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (U03) Group URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL, COLLECTORS, LOCAL (U04,05,06,07)
From Year: 2021 To Year: 2021 From Year: 2021 To Year: 2021
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Jan 1.740 1.135 1.084 1.072 1.056 0.997 1.272 Jan 1.831 1.129 1.026 1.012 1.007 0.959 1.329
Feb 1.564 1.239 1.246 1.067 1.091 0.983 1.228 Feb 1.608 1.248 1.307 1.044 1.077 0.982 1.289
Mar 1.375 1.005 0.968 0.943 0.976 0.899 1.078 Mar 1.384 0.960 0.923 0.908 0.936 0.880 1.110
Apr 1.332 0.959 0.919 0.936 0.933 0.862 1.061 Apr 1.317 0.913 0.881 0.903 0.900 0.850 1.117
May 1.247 0.952 0.920 0.909 0.877 0.852 1.020 May 1.260 0.922 0.891 0.879 0.849 0.838 1.038
Jun 1.227 0.948 0.912 0.915 0.888 0.854 1.027 Jun 1.254 0.937 0.892 0.910 0.881 0.872 1.079
Jul 1.285 0.952 0.921 0.905 0.893 0.842 1.046 Jul 1.308 0.929 0.910 0.896 0.907 0.869 1.122
Aug 1.257 0.953 0.931 0.920 0.893 0.846 1.026 Aug 1.279 0.918 0.909 0.900 0.880 0.857 1.088
Sep 1.295 0.960 0.945 0.935 0.900 0.841 1.061 Sep 1.324 0.948 0.918 0.924 0.870 0.829 1.083
Oct 1.331 0.973 0.936 0.920 0.906 0.852 1.068 Oct 1.377 0.954 0.913 0.904 0.901 0.873 1.122
Nov 1.393 0.957 0.934 0.917 0.921 0.855 1.093 Nov 1.478 0.968 0.941 0.928 0.953 0.894 1.197
Dec 1.364 0.973 0.941 0.926 0.918 0.863 1.109 Dec 1.426 0.972 0.954 0.958 0.932 0.893 1.212
Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Data
2022 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
(Total Entering Volume, Vehicles per Hour)
HOUR BEGINS
INTERSECTION
7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45
Benbow Rd & Boston Rd 664 661 640 595 563 545 518 489 416 405 407 431 472 504 485 508 481 507 505 506
Drake Rd & Howe Rd 1,609 1,620 1,607 1,581 1,528 1,480 1,427 1,325 1,219 1,197 1,194 1,273 1,139 1,158 1,239 1,309 1,315 1,309 1,337 1,333
Drake Rd & Hunt Rd 643 671 681 678 707 703 675 643 561 539 546 576 498 520 564 603 618 636 643 642
Howe Rd & Boston Rd 997 1,000 975 922 873 864 852 810 733 689 656 703 710 753 767 796 767 799 823 826
N Carpenter Rd & Boston Rd 926 891 882 842 779 796 769 716 638 615 616 660 700 747 722 728 718 737 728 725
N Carpenter Rd & Grafton Rd 1,291 1,229 1,154 1,082 1,019 969 920 859 769 781 840 889 828 895 923 967 947 960 965 995
U.S. 42 & Boston Rd 1,287 1,378 1,398 1,335 1,268 1,228 1,196 1,176 1,117 1,155 1,146 1,254 1,110 1,199 1,282 1,376 1,353 1,370 1,448 1,436
W 130th St & Boston Rd 1,432 1,418 1,356 1,269 1,222 1,178 1,152 1,104 1,012 1,008 995 1,029 970 1,015 1,060 1,109 1,080 1,120 1,141 1,141
S.R. 82 & Howe Rd 3,125 3,111 3,073 2,949 2,844 2,803 2,763 2,742 2,674 2,808 2,877 3,079 2,981 3,172 3,268 3,356 3,202 3,290 3,359 3,352
S.R. 82 & I-71 NB Ramps 4,377 4,268 3,996 3,767 3,448 3,455 3,396 3,198 3,062 2,882 2,819 2,933 2,816 2,874 2,883 3,006 3,029 3,110 3,111 3,067
S.R. 82 & I-71 SB Ramps 3,357 3,428 3,466 3,390 3,242 3,147 3,042 2,933 2,905 2,963 3,052 3,224 2,981 3,174 3,318 3,492 3,316 3,431 3,500 3,506
S.R. 82 & W 130th St 1,902 2,032 1,999 1,933 1,890 1,882 1,845 1,792 1,702 1,625 1,624 1,653 1,635 1,693 1,763 1,816 1,721 1,760 1,808 1,850
S.R. 303 & I-71 NB Ramps 2,410 2,298 2,207 2,109 1,956 1,927 1,850 1,734 1,637 1,588 1,569 1,565 1,600 1,715 1,771 1,835 1,598 1,732 1,809 1,853
S.R. 303 & I-71 SB Ramps 2,667 2,593 2,508 2,370 2,224 2,166 2,104 2,015 1,906 1,870 1,832 1,855 1,793 1,977 2,060 2,174 1,909 2,077 2,188 2,233
S.R. 303 & N Carpenter Rd 2,239 2,197 2,078 2,048 2,003 1,953 1,914 1,883 1,816 1,849 1,900 1,940 1,804 1,992 2,118 2,257 1,997 2,105 2,220 2,322
S.R. 303 & S Carpenter Rd 2,524 2,407 2,297 2,188 2,082 2,038 1,999 1,929 1,818 1,820 1,807 1,845 1,725 1,937 2,050 2,120 1,911 2,073 2,192 2,201
S.R. 303 & W 130th St 1,315 1,301 1,312 1,259 1,222 1,242 1,192 1,141 1,063 1,041 1,071 1,080 1,009 1,061 1,128 1,196 1,102 1,133 1,169 1,212
TOTAL 32,765 32,503 31,629 30,317 28,870 28,376 27,614 26,489 25,048 24,835 24,951 25,989 24,771 26,386 27,401 28,648 27,064 28,149 28,946 29,200
HOUR BEGINS
INTERSECTION
12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00
Benbow Rd & Boston Rd 505 502 510 503 506 543 596 673 618 686 757 816 720 762 822 827 870 894 911 949 948
Drake Rd & Howe Rd 1,374 1,405 1,409 1,437 1,374 1,445 1,517 1,627 1,577 1,648 1,792 1,972 1,790 1,846 1,935 2,050 2,102 2,196 2,303 2,269 2,281
Drake Rd & Hunt Rd 652 660 664 691 638 648 700 751 723 764 829 913 789 840 881 915 1,008 1,051 1,103 1,070 1,067
Howe Rd & Boston Rd 829 843 868 871 872 915 957 1,045 945 1,047 1,156 1,223 1,119 1,167 1,242 1,258 1,286 1,328 1,313 1,369 1,348
N Carpenter Rd & Boston Rd 751 781 807 830 831 859 895 954 837 897 958 1,025 995 1,020 1,047 1,053 1,104 1,156 1,228 1,326 1,323
N Carpenter Rd & Grafton Rd 1,007 1,034 1,052 1,048 1,037 1,093 1,161 1,256 1,171 1,315 1,453 1,559 1,336 1,413 1,491 1,589 1,680 1,713 1,736 1,752 1,761
U.S. 42 & Boston Rd 1,424 1,440 1,438 1,419 1,419 1,480 1,558 1,658 1,514 1,632 1,756 1,943 1,764 1,791 1,866 1,986 2,033 2,096 2,134 2,081 2,071
W 130th St & Boston Rd 1,155 1,176 1,199 1,198 1,155 1,231 1,322 1,485 1,377 1,533 1,747 1,911 1,637 1,706 1,856 1,940 2,000 2,091 2,106 2,102 2,088
S.R. 82 & Howe Rd 3,435 3,451 3,514 3,513 3,513 3,616 3,741 3,922 3,596 3,755 3,986 4,138 4,081 4,114 4,207 4,484 4,746 5,046 5,296 5,061 4,819
S.R. 82 & I-71 NB Ramps 3,083 3,081 3,098 3,076 3,071 3,253 3,450 3,649 3,351 3,591 3,852 4,090 3,918 4,017 4,170 4,314 4,431 4,553 4,680 4,599 4,394
S.R. 82 & I-71 SB Ramps 3,578 3,606 3,604 3,591 3,587 3,717 3,884 4,130 3,895 4,232 4,581 4,818 4,431 4,638 4,897 5,053 5,174 5,322 5,395 5,353 5,237
S.R. 82 & W 130th St 1,778 1,817 1,844 1,817 1,902 1,970 2,056 2,114 2,096 2,171 2,287 2,393 2,179 2,184 2,256 2,394 2,527 2,614 2,567 2,521 2,425
S.R. 303 & I-71 NB Ramps 1,894 1,843 1,869 1,885 1,841 1,909 1,927 2,050 1,899 2,023 2,124 2,269 2,177 2,247 2,311 2,375 2,394 2,473 2,498 2,352 2,281
S.R. 303 & I-71 SB Ramps 2,292 2,222 2,229 2,214 2,160 2,254 2,364 2,534 2,341 2,499 2,620 2,774 2,696 2,784 2,824 2,886 2,886 2,864 2,844 2,764 2,713
S.R. 303 & N Carpenter Rd 2,429 2,384 2,365 2,349 2,290 2,409 2,438 2,501 2,504 2,592 2,674 2,723 2,615 2,669 2,739 2,780 2,826 2,821 2,863 2,905 2,865
S.R. 303 & S Carpenter Rd 2,240 2,147 2,114 2,098 2,026 2,125 2,225 2,371 2,251 2,360 2,430 2,515 2,506 2,536 2,555 2,630 2,689 2,731 2,800 2,703 2,641
S.R. 303 & W 130th St 1,281 1,283 1,309 1,344 1,283 1,356 1,341 1,389 1,298 1,395 1,369 1,400 1,482 1,493 1,468 1,449 1,425 1,412 1,499 1,477 1,456
TOTAL 29,707 29,675 29,893 29,884 29,505 30,823 32,132 34,109 31,993 34,140 36,371 38,482 36,235 37,227 38,567 39,983 41,181 42,361 43,276 42,653 41,718
LEGEND
Most vehicles approaching intersection within one-hour interval, evaluated once before noon (AM peak) and once after noon (PM peak)
Most vehicles approaching entire study area within one-hour interval, evaluated once before noon (AM peak) and once after noon (PM peak)
STREETS: Benbow Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022
Note: Pedestrians are counted by which crosswalk they use.
Morning Peak Hour 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM i.e. A pedestrian crossing the western approach crosswalk is counted under From: W.

TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PED LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PED LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PED LEFT THRU RIGHT TKS PED
7:00 AM 0 2 0 63 0 2 0 74 0 139
7:15 AM 1 3 0 59 1 6 1 86 2 151
7:30 AM 0 5 0 83 1 2 1 95 1 185
7:45 AM 2 2 0 94 3 0 7 81 4 189
TOTAL: 3 12 0 299 5 10 9 336 7 664
PHF 0.38 0.60 0.80 0.42 0.32 0.88

% trucks 0% 3% 2%
Directional Distribution 100%
Afternoon Peak Hour 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM

4:30 PM 4 3 0 121 1 1 5 77 1 211
4:45 PM 4 7 0 124 3 2 3 85 1 226
5:00 PM 1 8 0 120 1 2 6 97 1 233
5:15 PM 1 12 0 123 3 0 2 100 3 241
TOTAL: 10 30 0 488 8 5 16 359 6 911
PHF 0.63 0.63 0.98 0.67 0.67 0.90

% trucks 0% 1% 2%
Current Year Design Hour Volumes
N-S Roadway Classification Urban Principal Arterial, Urban Minor Arterial, & Urban Minor Collector DHV Factor 1.10 Seasonal Adjustment Factor 0.91
E-W Roadway Classification Urban Principal Arterial, Urban Minor Arterial, & Urban Minor Collector DHV Factor 1.10 Seasonal Adjustment Factor 0.91
FROM: N FROM: E FROM: S FROM: W

LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT
AM DHV 10 10 330 10 10 370
PM DHV 10 30 540 10 20 390
ADT 81 210 4741 93 185 4330
AADT 70 190 4330 80 170 3950
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: Drake Road and Howe Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 14 14 18 0 1 35 31 0 6 101 3 0 97 49 4 2 373
7:15 AM 8 18 20 0 0 36 49 0 8 130 0 0 72 43 2 0 386
7:30 AM 14 16 26 1 1 44 40 0 7 112 3 0 77 50 5 0 395
7:45 AM 19 19 29 0 1 72 37 1 9 108 7 0 82 58 14 0 455
TOTAL: 55 67 93 1 3 187 157 1 30 451 13 0 328 200 25 2 1609
PHF 0.72 0.88 0.80 0.75 0.65 0.80 0.83 0.87 0.46 0.85 0.86 0.45
% trucks 0% 0% 0% 0%
Directional Distribution 30% 70%

4:30 PM 41 99 58 0 4 88 42 3 16 67 7 0 62 97 14 2 595
4:45 PM 47 90 57 0 6 80 36 3 10 68 1 3 50 77 9 1 531
5:00 PM 35 89 61 1 5 72 37 5 12 69 5 1 60 102 13 0 560
5:15 PM 39 84 53 1 12 118 46 3 16 72 7 0 68 87 15 2 617
TOTAL: 162 362 229 2 27 358 161 14 54 276 20 4 240 363 51 5 2303
PHF 0.86 0.91 0.94 0.56 0.76 0.88 0.84 0.96 0.71 0.88 0.89 0.85
% trucks 0% 3% 1% 1%

AM DHV 60 70 100 10 210 170 30 500 10 360 220 30
PM DHV 180 400 250 30 390 180 60 300 20 260 400 60
ADT 1739 3214 2342 198 3364 2162 507 4179 214 2989 3324 438
AADT 1590 2930 2140 180 3070 1970 460 3820 200 2730 3030 400
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: Drake Road and Hunt Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 1 16 1 43 1 0 47 25 4 133
7:15 AM 2 38 0 47 6 0 42 20 0 155
7:30 AM 1 44 0 54 2 0 44 20 3 165
7:45 AM 2 48 2 44 6 1 61 29 0 190
TOTAL: 6 146 3 188 15 1 194 94 7 643
PHF 0.75 0.76 0.87 0.63 0.80 0.81

% trucks 2% 0% 2%

4:30 PM 7 76 0 49 2 1 82 55 2 271
4:45 PM 5 73 0 58 4 3 69 58 0 267
5:00 PM 5 72 0 53 1 4 87 47 0 265
5:15 PM 6 102 0 53 2 3 84 53 2 300
TOTAL: 23 323 0 213 9 11 322 213 4 1103
PHF 0.82 0.79 0.92 0.56 0.93 0.92

% trucks 0% 5% 1%

AM DHV 10 160 210 20 210 100
PM DHV 30 350 230 10 350 230
ADT 171 3124 2499 239 3002 2231
AADT 160 2850 2280 220 2740 2040
STREETS: Howe Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 13 9 0 43 27 1 65 68 1 225
7:15 AM 12 11 1 42 37 6 66 64 2 232
7:30 AM 15 14 0 50 46 3 61 76 1 262
7:45 AM 21 12 0 80 40 0 44 81 5 278
TOTAL: 61 46 1 215 150 10 236 289 9 997
PHF 0.73 0.82 0.67 0.82 0.89 0.89

% trucks 1% 3% 2%

4:30 PM 54 39 0 99 41 1 29 62 3 324
4:45 PM 41 32 0 99 41 1 33 76 1 322
5:00 PM 41 41 2 97 41 2 33 101 4 354
5:15 PM 37 33 0 95 37 0 32 79 3 313
TOTAL: 173 145 2 390 160 4 127 318 11 1313
PHF 0.80 0.88 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.79

% trucks 1% 1% 2%

AM DHV 70 50 240 160 260 320
PM DHV 190 160 430 180 140 350
ADT 1757 1405 3736 2075 1966 3991
AADT 1600 1280 3410 1890 1790 3640
STREETS: North Carpenter Road and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 22 46 1 32 18 1 51 34 1 203
7:15 AM 12 49 1 33 25 1 64 20 0 203
7:30 AM 31 61 2 28 19 1 74 27 0 240
7:45 AM 20 76 0 56 23 1 71 34 0 280
TOTAL: 85 232 4 149 85 4 260 115 1 926
PHF 0.69 0.76 0.67 0.85 0.88 0.85

% trucks 1% 2% 0%

4:30 PM 27 102 0 21 7 0 53 66 0 276
4:45 PM 43 81 0 41 20 0 72 59 0 316
5:00 PM 33 95 0 31 15 0 86 56 0 316
5:15 PM 35 90 0 44 15 1 87 49 1 320
TOTAL: 138 368 0 137 57 1 298 230 1 1228
PHF 0.80 0.90 0.78 0.71 0.86 0.87

% trucks 0% 1% 0%

AM DHV 90 250 160 90 290 130
PM DHV 150 400 150 60 330 250
ADT 1276 3549 1977 972 3462 2450
AADT 1160 3240 1810 890 3160 2240
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: North Carpenter Road and Grafton Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 2 50 14 1 65 42 4 4 8 12 15 2 15 70 25 1 322
7:15 AM 10 26 15 0 25 45 8 1 11 25 23 3 21 75 22 3 306
7:30 AM 6 35 13 2 23 60 9 7 7 28 22 0 17 69 22 3 311
7:45 AM 15 55 18 1 25 38 12 3 18 35 21 0 15 66 34 4 352
TOTAL: 33 166 60 4 138 185 33 15 44 100 81 5 68 280 103 11 1291
PHF 0.55 0.75 0.83 0.53 0.77 0.69 0.61 0.71 0.88 0.81 0.93 0.76
% trucks 2% 4% 2% 2%

4:30 PM 14 58 27 0 25 89 14 3 42 37 23 0 24 69 24 0 446
4:45 PM 9 66 25 0 32 70 12 3 37 47 16 0 21 65 29 2 429
5:00 PM 12 41 32 0 40 88 9 3 45 53 17 0 17 49 25 0 428
5:15 PM 5 48 29 0 30 94 18 0 43 42 28 0 14 58 24 1 433
TOTAL: 40 213 113 0 127 341 53 9 167 179 84 0 76 241 102 3 1736
PHF 0.71 0.81 0.88 0.79 0.91 0.74 0.93 0.84 0.75 0.79 0.87 0.88
% trucks 0% 2% 0% 1%

AM DHV 40 180 70 150 200 40 50 110 90 70 310 110
PM DHV 40 230 120 140 370 60 180 200 90 80 260 110
ADT 476 2573 1042 1287 2778 489 1403 2024 1206 964 2802 1267
AADT 430 2350 950 1180 2540 450 1280 1850 1100 880 2560 1160
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: State Route 82 and Howe Road COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

7:00 AM 13 3 7 1 60 158 12 12 16 7 192 1 6 233 2 12 709
7:15 AM 15 5 4 0 77 164 7 15 18 10 235 5 5 228 4 18 772
7:30 AM 13 3 7 1 74 217 23 22 22 7 208 4 11 215 6 13 806
7:45 AM 19 7 7 0 126 264 22 35 20 8 179 1 7 173 6 12 838
TOTAL: 60 18 25 2 337 803 64 84 76 32 814 11 29 849 18 55 3125
PHF 0.79 0.64 0.89 0.67 0.76 0.70 0.86 0.80 0.87 0.66 0.91 0.75
% trucks 2% 7% 1% 6%

4:30 PM 80 23 38 0 200 333 82 10 36 33 148 4 43 292 5 13 1313
4:45 PM 59 20 44 1 198 349 92 6 26 28 112 2 35 323 6 8 1292
5:00 PM 72 29 32 2 196 297 109 6 26 30 131 0 51 343 12 5 1328
5:15 PM 58 26 42 0 206 329 98 5 26 36 156 2 39 342 5 2 1363
TOTAL: 269 98 156 3 800 1308 381 27 114 127 547 8 168 1300 28 28 5296
PHF 0.84 0.84 0.89 0.97 0.94 0.87 0.79 0.88 0.88 0.82 0.95 0.58
% trucks 1% 1% 1% 2%

AM DHV 70 20 30 370 880 70 80 40 890 30 930 20
PM DHV 290 110 170 880 1430 420 120 140 600 180 1420 30
ADT 2821 1158 1789 5891 12514 3320 1327 1525 7197 2184 12741 454
AADT 2550 1050 1620 5330 11310 3000 1200 1380 6510 1970 11520 410
CITY: Strongsville

7:00 AM 270 173 17 28 12 2 130 353 13 966
7:15 AM 302 179 19 49 25 6 147 413 20 1115
7:30 AM 326 185 18 83 33 7 126 399 13 1152
7:45 AM 330 187 26 65 57 9 189 316 10 1144
TOTAL: 1228 724 80 225 127 24 592 1481 56 4377
PHF 0.93 0.97 0.68 0.56 0.78 0.90

% trucks 4% 7% 3%

4:30 PM 283 119 10 93 31 7 320 270 16 1116
4:45 PM 346 145 15 78 35 3 329 249 8 1182
5:00 PM 287 107 18 76 36 1 373 287 9 1166
5:15 PM 306 124 7 69 58 1 364 295 8 1216
TOTAL: 1222 495 50 316 160 12 1386 1101 41 4680
PHF 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.69 0.93 0.93

% trucks 3% 3% 2%
N-S Roadway Classification Urban Interstate DHV Factor 1.10 Seasonal Adjustment Factor 0.91

AM DHV 1340 790 250 140 650 1620
PM DHV 1340 540 350 180 1520 1210
ADT 15426 6176 3963 1506 12962 12840
AADT 13950 5580 3590 1360 11720 11610
CITY: Strongsville

7:00 AM 130 7 20 96 8 70 0 376 36 9 728
7:15 AM 152 14 30 136 9 69 5 370 36 26 793
7:30 AM 203 11 34 196 15 72 4 361 39 8 905
7:45 AM 244 18 25 191 10 85 3 344 42 11 931
TOTAL: 729 50 109 619 42 296 12 1451 153 54 3357
PHF 0.75 0.80 0.79 0.87 0.96 0.91

% trucks 7% 6% 4% 3%

4:30 PM 348 3 29 221 8 149 6 445 95 11 1287
4:45 PM 386 2 26 256 7 154 3 421 94 6 1337
5:00 PM 375 1 22 238 8 146 6 504 105 7 1390
5:15 PM 373 7 24 246 2 150 5 492 96 4 1381
TOTAL: 1482 13 101 961 25 599 20 1862 390 28 5395
PHF 0.96 0.87 0.94 0.97 0.92 0.93

% trucks 1% 2% 3% 1%

AM DHV 800 120 680 330 1590 170
PM DHV 1630 110 1050 660 2040 430
ADT 14379 1168 12076 5190 20135 3619
AADT 13010 1060 10920 4700 18200 3270
CITY: Strongsville/North Royalton

7:00 AM 5 15 16 0 10 92 2 7 44 30 10 7 12 104 18 6 358
7:15 AM 2 22 28 2 13 153 9 12 59 36 13 1 15 97 34 9 481
7:30 AM 4 24 31 2 19 188 14 17 46 51 12 3 12 81 40 4 522
7:45 AM 16 56 45 5 18 138 8 5 45 37 16 2 26 106 30 8 541
TOTAL: 27 117 120 9 60 571 33 41 194 154 51 13 65 388 122 27 1902
PHF 0.42 0.52 0.67 0.79 0.76 0.59 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.63 0.92 0.76
% trucks 3% 6% 3% 5%

4:30 PM 24 57 37 3 23 176 5 2 50 40 14 2 45 138 34 12 643
4:45 PM 25 68 38 4 33 175 15 7 48 48 21 1 37 144 35 3 687
5:00 PM 24 81 39 1 30 158 8 6 43 40 18 3 30 136 34 5 641
5:15 PM 31 67 31 1 22 114 8 2 43 59 28 2 33 122 38 2 596
TOTAL: 104 273 145 9 108 623 36 17 184 187 81 8 145 540 141 22 2567
PHF 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.82 0.88 0.60 0.92 0.79 0.72 0.81 0.94 0.93
% trucks 2% 2% 2% 3%
E-W Roadway Classification Urban Principal Arterial, Urban Minor Arterial, & Urban Minor Collector DHV Factor 1.10 Seasonal Adjustment Factor

AM DHV 30 130 130 70 630 40 210 170 60 70 420 130
PM DHV 110 300 160 120 680 40 200 200 90 160 590 150
ADT 1009 2768 2267 970 7548 450 2235 2237 819 1582 6070 1556
AADT 910 2500 2050 880 6820 410 2020 2020 740 1430 5490 1410
CITY: Brunswick

7:00 AM 72 68 8 34 33 5 134 224 10 565
7:15 AM 52 72 11 37 48 5 154 214 16 577
7:30 AM 76 82 4 58 55 4 147 214 8 632
7:45 AM 68 51 9 63 51 5 191 212 6 636
TOTAL: 268 273 32 192 187 19 626 864 40 2410
PHF 0.88 0.83 0.76 0.85 0.82 0.96

% trucks 6% 5% 3%

4:30 PM 177 110 9 95 31 2 132 116 9 661
4:45 PM 154 55 6 81 27 6 123 122 9 562
5:00 PM 191 92 7 100 25 2 137 130 6 675
5:15 PM 162 57 2 96 35 2 119 131 6 600
TOTAL: 684 314 24 372 118 12 511 499 30 2498
PHF 0.90 0.71 0.93 0.84 0.93 0.95

% trucks 2% 2% 3%

AM DHV 290 300 210 210 690 950
PM DHV 750 350 410 130 560 550
ADT 7060 3258 3326 1634 7896 5632
AADT 6450 2970 3070 1510 7210 5140
CITY: Brunswick

7:00 AM 72 0 6 6 18 71 9 68 7 302 71 9 608
7:15 AM 64 0 15 8 15 68 11 59 1 318 95 16 634
7:30 AM 56 0 22 5 25 111 6 63 4 343 91 6 711
7:45 AM 73 0 13 1 21 103 14 76 2 326 102 17 714
TOTAL: 265 0 56 20 79 353 40 266 14 1289 359 48 2667
PHF 0.91 N/A 0.64 0.79 0.80 0.88 0.94 0.88 0.93
% trucks 6% 9% 5% 3%
Directional Distribution 100% 21% 79%

4:30 PM 39 1 66 6 42 221 4 119 2 196 85 8 769
4:45 PM 43 0 67 7 38 191 7 77 0 194 70 4 680
5:00 PM 43 0 63 3 51 213 4 57 1 192 79 1 698
5:15 PM 41 0 55 1 45 211 3 87 0 195 63 3 697
TOTAL: 166 1 251 17 176 836 18 340 3 777 297 16 2844
PHF 0.97 0.25 0.94 0.86 0.95 0.71 0.99 0.87 0.92
% trucks 4% 2% 1% 1%
Directional Distribution 100% 49% 51%
FROM: N FROM: E SLIP LANE FROM I-71 SB FROM: W

AM DHV 290 10 60 90 390 290 1420 390
PM DHV 180 10 280 190 920 370 850 330
ADT 2480 9 1861 1380 8910 4167 11044 4135
AADT 2290 30 1720 1260 8130 3850 10080 3780
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: State Route 303 and North Carpenter Road COUNT DATE: 10/18/2022

7:00 AM 70 7 110 7 5 144 8 10 0 5 9 1 16 177 1 7 552
7:15 AM 81 10 65 0 5 112 17 12 8 7 10 1 50 234 0 23 599
7:30 AM 80 7 28 3 9 141 26 7 4 3 5 0 21 188 2 7 514
7:45 AM 71 13 44 3 7 162 29 7 10 10 4 0 24 196 4 14 574
TOTAL: 302 37 247 13 26 559 80 36 22 25 28 2 111 795 7 51 2239
PHF 0.93 0.71 0.56 0.72 0.86 0.69 0.55 0.63 0.70 0.56 0.85 0.44
% trucks 2% 5% 3% 6%

4:30 PM 49 21 29 0 37 232 48 2 17 26 22 0 36 157 9 7 683
4:45 PM 47 39 41 0 32 234 57 1 23 36 18 0 48 140 12 2 727
5:00 PM 43 31 48 0 26 236 44 7 16 36 22 0 45 166 11 2 724
5:15 PM 31 31 52 0 37 250 50 1 24 33 15 0 40 136 30 1 729
TOTAL: 170 122 170 0 132 952 199 11 80 131 77 0 169 599 62 12 2863
PHF 0.87 0.78 0.82 0.89 0.95 0.87 0.83 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.52
% trucks 0% 1% 0% 1%

AM DHV 330 40 270 30 610 90 20 30 30 120 870 10
PM DHV 190 130 190 150 1050 220 90 140 80 190 660 70
ADT 2429 1202 2157 1441 10138 1838 996 1264 962 2041 8611 640
AADT 2220 1100 1970 1320 9260 1680 910 1150 880 1860 7860 580
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: State Route 303 and South Carpenter Road COUNT DATE: 10/18/2022

7:00 AM 68 14 76 4 51 99 1 290 11 7 609
7:15 AM 59 22 62 11 26 79 0 343 13 12 604
7:30 AM 63 16 113 2 14 101 2 333 10 6 650
7:45 AM 76 25 113 6 24 91 2 325 7 14 661
TOTAL: 266 77 364 23 115 370 5 1291 41 39 2524
PHF 0.77 0.81 0.56 0.92 0.94 0.79

% trucks 5% 1% 3%

4:30 PM 119 89 197 4 18 41 0 214 45 8 723
4:45 PM 77 86 192 5 31 38 3 217 30 6 671
5:00 PM 57 86 216 3 23 38 1 219 51 3 690
5:15 PM 87 82 228 2 36 37 0 206 40 4 716
TOTAL: 340 343 833 14 108 154 4 856 166 21 2800
PHF 0.96 0.91 0.75 0.94 0.98 0.81

% trucks 1% 2% 2%
SLIP LANE FROM-71 SB FROM: E FROM: S FROM: W

AM DHV 290 80 400 130 410 1420 50
PM DHV 370 380 920 120 170 940 180
ADT 4167 2396 7896 1476 2459 12653 1380
AADT 3800 2190 7210 1350 2250 11550 1260
CITY: Brunswick/Hinckley

7:00 AM 23 25 51 2 3 43 13 1 12 20 7 1 36 49 14 2 296
7:15 AM 22 22 40 4 3 61 9 2 15 25 8 3 29 47 11 6 292
7:30 AM 35 42 54 3 3 71 19 1 16 21 5 4 36 57 9 8 368
7:45 AM 23 37 29 3 10 71 21 3 7 30 10 0 48 67 6 3 359
TOTAL: 103 126 174 12 19 246 62 7 50 96 30 8 149 220 40 19 1315
PHF 0.74 0.75 0.81 0.48 0.87 0.74 0.78 0.80 0.75 0.78 0.82 0.71
% trucks 3% 2% 5% 5%

4:30 PM 29 66 28 5 5 72 25 1 6 38 5 3 41 53 12 5 380
4:45 PM 19 41 29 4 7 73 23 2 9 32 3 0 45 55 7 3 343
5:00 PM 23 47 46 3 15 67 28 2 17 44 10 4 26 55 6 1 384
5:15 PM 25 29 50 2 13 74 29 1 10 26 5 1 56 65 10 5 392
TOTAL: 96 183 153 14 40 286 105 6 42 140 23 8 168 228 35 14 1499
PHF 0.83 0.69 0.77 0.67 0.97 0.91 0.62 0.80 0.58 0.75 0.88 0.73
% trucks 3% 1% 4% 3%

AM DHV 110 140 190 20 270 70 50 110 30 160 240 40
PM DHV 110 200 170 40 310 120 50 150 30 180 250 40
ADT 1112 1731 2367 377 3647 984 680 1425 325 2108 3182 571
AADT 1020 1580 2160 340 3330 900 620 1300 300 1920 2910 520
STREETS: US 42 and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 5 14 7 2 20 26 20 0 11 50 24 0 11 45 9 0 242
7:15 AM 7 25 3 0 19 41 20 0 14 62 35 0 15 49 6 0 296
7:30 AM 6 47 8 1 24 47 13 0 21 81 38 0 11 49 12 0 357
7:45 AM 7 45 4 0 36 62 21 0 18 77 35 0 24 51 12 1 392
TOTAL: 25 131 22 3 99 176 74 0 64 270 132 0 61 194 39 1 1287
PHF 0.89 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.71 0.88 0.76 0.83 0.87 0.64 0.95 0.81
% trucks 2% 0% 0% 0%

4:30 PM 20 139 26 0 69 58 27 0 21 101 22 1 13 50 25 0 571
4:45 PM 21 111 24 0 69 42 24 0 16 85 32 1 9 51 22 0 506
5:00 PM 20 99 20 2 56 62 21 0 31 94 35 0 12 43 22 2 515
5:15 PM 27 124 20 0 59 48 25 0 23 91 36 1 11 48 30 2 542
TOTAL: 88 473 90 2 253 210 97 0 91 371 125 3 45 192 99 4 2134
PHF 0.81 0.85 0.87 0.92 0.85 0.90 0.73 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.94 0.83
% trucks 0% 0% 1% 1%

AM DHV 30 140 20 110 190 80 70 300 150 70 210 40
PM DHV 100 520 100 280 230 110 100 410 140 50 210 110
ADT 1012 4567 858 2336 2117 1112 878 4795 1582 763 2265 1035
AADT 920 4170 780 2130 1930 1020 800 4380 1440 700 2070 940
STREETS: W 130th Street and Boston Road COUNT DATE: 10/04/2022

7:00 AM 9 44 14 0 13 10 16 0 6 103 19 0 42 23 8 0 307
7:15 AM 9 50 26 1 15 10 22 0 6 107 14 2 55 31 4 1 349
7:30 AM 12 67 22 2 13 10 20 1 9 109 23 2 50 41 11 0 387
7:45 AM 14 88 42 3 11 19 16 0 7 89 16 2 54 23 10 2 389
TOTAL: 44 249 104 6 52 49 74 1 28 408 72 6 201 118 33 3 1432
PHF 0.79 0.71 0.62 0.87 0.64 0.84 0.78 0.94 0.78 0.91 0.72 0.75
% trucks 2% 1% 1% 1%

4:30 PM 32 122 67 2 24 36 29 0 17 117 23 0 31 25 9 0 532
4:45 PM 30 98 71 0 30 43 18 0 17 94 10 0 41 22 10 0 484
5:00 PM 38 126 54 0 18 27 33 0 27 118 23 0 46 21 11 0 542
5:15 PM 27 113 60 0 38 56 35 0 18 103 14 1 48 24 12 1 548
TOTAL: 127 459 252 2 110 162 115 0 79 432 70 1 166 92 42 1 2106
PHF 0.84 0.91 0.89 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.73 0.92 0.76 0.86 0.92 0.88
% trucks 0% 0% 0% 0%

AM DHV 50 270 110 60 50 80 30 450 80 220 130 40
PM DHV 140 500 280 120 180 130 90 470 80 180 100 50
ADT 1286 4413 2303 962 1269 1253 654 4635 858 2155 1160 614
AADT 1170 4030 2100 880 1160 1140 600 4230 780 1970 1060 560
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: I71 NB between 82&303 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

7:00 AM 675 28 675
7:15 AM 899 42 899
7:30 AM 927 55 927
7:45 AM 796 50 796
TOTAL: 3297 175 3297
PHF 0.89
% trucks 5%

4:30 PM 617 26 617
4:45 PM 638 25 638
5:00 PM 610 19 610
5:15 PM 573 16 573
TOTAL: 2438 86 2438
PHF 0.96
% trucks 4%

AM DHV 3630
PM DHV 2680
ADT 33065
AADT 29920
CITY: Strongsville
STREETS: I71 NB North of SR 82 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

7:00 AM 1167 43 1167
7:15 AM 1449 59 1449
7:30 AM 1215 46 1215
7:45 AM 1238 63 1238
TOTAL: 5069 211 5069
PHF 0.87
% trucks 4%
Directional Distribution

4:30 PM 917 30 917
4:45 PM 882 35 882
5:00 PM 901 36 901
5:15 PM 879 18 879
TOTAL: 3579 119 3579
PHF 0.98
% trucks 3%
Directional Distribution

AM DHV 5580
PM DHV 3940
ADT 49386
AADT 44690
CITY: Brunswick

7:00 AM 378 27 378
7:15 AM 451 38 451
7:30 AM 493 24 493
7:45 AM 485 34 485
TOTAL: 1807 123 1807
PHF 0.92
% trucks 7%

4:30 PM 835 32 835
4:45 PM 842 14 842
5:00 PM 814 19 814
5:15 PM 851 23 851
TOTAL: 3342 88 3342
PHF 0.98
% trucks 3%

AM DHV 1990
PM DHV 3680
ADT 32788
AADT 29670
CITY: Brunswick
STREETS: I71 SB North of 82 COUNT DATE: 10/12/2022

7:00 AM 546 30 546
7:15 AM 654 38 654
7:30 AM 743 36 743
7:45 AM 746 54 746
TOTAL: 2689 158 2689
PHF 0.90
% trucks 6%

4:30 PM 1298 22 1298
4:45 PM 1282 18 1282
5:00 PM 1238 23 1238
5:15 PM 1216 27 1216
TOTAL: 5034 90 5034
PHF 0.97
% trucks 2%

AM DHV 2960
PM DHV 5540
ADT 49080
AADT 44420
APPENDIX J
TRAFFIC ANALYSES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – LOS Criteria
Table 2 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
AM Peak
Table 3 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
PM Peak
Table 4 – 2047 Design Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build AM
Peak
Table 5 – 2047 Design Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build PM
Peak
Table 6 – 2027 Opening Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Northbound
Table 7 – 2027 Opening Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Southbound
Table 8 – 2047 Design Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Northbound
Table 9 – 2047 Design Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Southbound
Table 10 – 2027 Opening Year Ramp Junction Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Northbound
Table 11 – 2027 Opening Year Ramp Junction Capacity Analysis Results – No Build &
Build Southbound
Table 12 – 2047 Design Year Ramp Junction Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
Northbound
Southbound
TRAFFIC ANALYSES
Level of Service Analyses
Capacity analyses were performed utilizing Highway Capacity Software (HCS) developed by
McTrans Corporation. Analyses were performed for all intersections and the freeway facility
consisting of ramps and segments as shown in Appendix A. The analysis included opening year
and design year for each alternative including the No Build.
All intersections and freeway facility entities are located withing the Northeast Ohio Areawide
Coordinating Agency (NOACA) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area. According to the
ODOT Analysis and Traffic Simulation Manual (OATS), for intersections within an MPO, an
approach and control level of service (LOS) of E or better is acceptable while the overall
intersection must operate at a LOS of D or better. For freeway facilities within an MPO
(segments, ramp merges, and ramp diverges), a level of service of D or better is acceptable.
Table 1 shows the level of service (LOS) thresholds according to the Highway Capacity Manual
for the freeway segment, ramps junction, stop controlled and signalized intersections.
Table 1 – LOS Criteria

Ramp Junction Two-Way Stop-
Signalized
Freeway Segment Merge, Diverge, Controlled
Level of Intersection
& Weaving) Intersection
Service
Density
Density (pc/mi/ln) Delay (Seconds) Delay (Seconds)
(pc/mi/ln)
A ≤ 11 ≤ 10 ≤ 10 ≤ 10
B > 11-18 > 10-20 > 10-20 > 10-15
C > 18-26 > 20-28 > 20-35 > 15-25
D > 26-35 > 28-35 > 35-55 > 25-35
E > 35-45 > 35 > 55-80 > 35-50
F Demand Exceeds
> 45 or V/C > 1.00 > 80 or V/C > 1.00 > 50 or V/C > 1.00
Capacity
Level of service comparison exhibits are provided in Appendix K to aid in a visual summary of
the 2047 HCS results.
Intersection Analyses:
The existing and proposed study area intersections were analyzed using Highway Capacity
Software (HCS) for the peak hours for both 2027 and 2047 volumes. The analyses were
conducted based on guidance and criteria provided in the ODOT OATS Manual.
The intersections are structured along the three main east-west corridors in the study area; SR
82, Boston Road, and SR 303. These corridors are evaluated to points of adjacent north-south
connections along both sides of I-71. These include North Carpenter Road and Howe Road, west
of I-71, and West 130th Street, east of I-71.
• The SR 82 corridor includes the intersections with Howe Road, I-71SB ramps, I-71NB
ramps, and West 130th Street.
• The Boston Road corridor includes the intersections with US 42, Howe Road, North
Carpenter Road, Benbow Road, and West 130th Street. In build scenarios, I-71 ramp
intersections are included.
• The SR 303 corridor includes the intersections with North Carpenter Road, South
Carpenter Road, I-71SB ramps, I-71NB ramps, and West 130th Street.
• Additionally, the intersections at Grafton Road and Drake Road along these north-south
corridors as well as the Drake Road & Hunt Road intersection are included.
Based on existing signal data obtained from local agencies, the intersections known to have
coordinated signals were analyzed together as a coordinated corridor. Otherwise, intersections
were assumed to be uncoordinated and analyzed individually.
Roadway improvements were to be expected at the intersections in the immediate vicinity of

the Boston Road/I-71 interchange area. However, it was determined that the intersections of
US 42 (Pearl Road)-Boston Road and Drake Road-Hunt Road would not meet the capacity needs
for the 2047 PM peak No Build conditions. These intersections were then analyzed with an
improved roadway configuration to achieve acceptable results. All build alternatives were
analyzed with this configuration to estimate which improvements may be driven by the project.
For the Drake Road and Hunt Road intersection, an eastbound right turn lane is necessary for
the No Build condition and that satisfies the build conditions. Therefore, no improvements are
driven by the project for this intersection. For the intersection of US 42 (Pearl Road) and Boston
Road, results show that the only change which would be dictated by the project would be a
new westbound right turn lane for all build alternatives for the design year. Additionally, to
attain an acceptable level of service for Alternative 1, 2, and 3, the intersection of Grafton
Road and North Carpenter Road would also need improvements. The No Build condition has an
acceptable level of service; therefore the improvements would be project driven.
Generally, infrastructure improvements considered were limited to the Boston Road corridor
and nearby intersections according to capacity needed for modelled build conditions. No
improvements or reconfigurations were considered for the SR 82 and SR 303 corridors.
The analysis delay and LOS results are organized by design year and peak hour period on Tables
2 through 5. Within each table, the results for each alternative are organized by intersection,
grouped along east-west corridors, for comparison of overall operations performance.
Additionally, refer to Appendix K for comparisons of change in LOS performance between an
alternative and No Build conditions.
Traffic Plates illustrating peak hour traffic volumes for each intersection are provided in
Appendix H. HCS reports detailing analysis results are provided in Appendix L. Turn lane length
calculations were completed and are provided in Appendix N.
No Build
The LOS for opening year 2027 and design year 2047 peak hours for the study intersection was
calculated. These LOS values are used to identify capacity and or operational deficiencies in
current conditions.
SR 82 – With the exception of the SR 82-Howe Road intersection, all intersections along SR 82
result in acceptable delays and LOS for both opening year 2027 and design year 2047. Results
ranged from LOS A to LOS C. The I-71 SB ramp intersection and West 130th Street intersection
resulted in LOS D during the 2047 PM period.
The SR 82/Howe Road intersection typically resulted in LOS D for the AM periods and LOS E for
PM periods for both opening year 2027 and design year 2047.
The SR 82/Howe Road intersection typically resulted in poor/failing level of service throughout
each scenario, including No Build conditions. Attaining acceptable operational performance at
this intersection is outside the study scope. The results at this location should be appraised for
degree of improvement.
Boston Road – With one exception, all intersections along Boston Road result in acceptable
delays and LOS for both opening year 2027 and design year 2047. Results ranged from LOS A to
LOS D. The exception noted is US 42-Boston Road intersection has an LOS E for the 2047 PM
period.
SR 303 – All intersections along SR 303 result in acceptable delays and LOS for both opening
year 2027 and design year 2047. Results ranged from LOS A to LOS C.
Drake & Grafton – The Drake Road-Howe Road intersection results in LOS C or D. The Drake
Road-Hunt Road intersection is stop controlled with a LOS B for AM periods and LOS D and E for
PM periods. The North Carpenter Road-Grafton Road intersection results in LOS B in all periods.
Alternative 1
SR 82 – Overall delay is improved along this corridor for all periods. The LOS range from LOS A
to LOS E. Generally, as the decrease in delay is moderate at each individual intersection, the
LOS is unchanged over No Build scenario. However, the I-71 SB ramp intersection decreased
from LOS C to LOS D for 2027 PM period and improved from LOS D to LOS C for the 2047 PM
period.
Boston Road – Delays and LOS along Boston Road are mixed with some having an increase in
delay and some having a decrease in delay. The levels of service range from LOS B to LOS D.
Results are acceptable.
SR 303 – Overall delays range from nominal change to modest improvement. LOS ranges from
LOS A to LOS C. Results are acceptable.
Drake & Grafton – The Howe Road-Drake Road intersection LOS improves from LOS D to LOS C
for the 2047 AM period. The Drake Road-Hunt Road intersection improves from a LOS D and
failing LOS E to a LOS C for 2027 and 2047 PM periods, respectively. The North Carpenter Road-
Grafton Road intersection results in increased delay but with LOS B or C in all periods.
Alternative 2
SR 82 – Generally, the corridor experiences a nominal to moderate decrease in delays resulting
in a LOS equal to or better than No Build conditions in each analysis period. The I-71 SB ramp
and West 130th Street intersections improve from LOS D to LOS C for the 2047 PM period. The
Howe Road intersection improves but remains LOS E for PM periods. Results are acceptable.
delay and some having a decrease in delay. The levels of service range from LOS A to LOS D.
Alternative 3
and West 130th Street intersections improve from LOS D to LOS C for the 2047 PM period. The
Howe Road intersection improves but remains LOS E for PM periods. Results are acceptable.
delay and some having a decrease in delay. The levels of service range from LOS A to LOS D.
Alternative 4
in no change in LOS. The I-71 SB ramp intersection improved from LOS D to LOS C for the 2047
PM period. The Howe Road intersection experiences a nominal decrease in delay but remains
LOS E for 2047 periods. Otherwise, results are acceptable.
Grafton Road intersection results had minimal change in delay.
Full Interchange
and West 130th Street intersections improved from LOS D to LOS C for the 2047 PM period. The
Howe Road intersection improves but remains LOS F for 2047 periods. Results are acceptable.
Grafton Road intersection results had minimal change in delay.
Table 2 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build AM Peak
NB SB EB WB Overall
Intersection Build L L L L L
Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
O O O O O
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec)
S S S S S
No Build 46.4 D 39.6 D 43.8 D 45.3 D 45.1 D
SR 82 Alt 1 43.4 D 37.0 D 43.9 D 36.9 D 40.2 D
(Royalton Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Road) & Alt 3 41.5 D 34.9 C 37.7 D 38.2 D 38.8 D
Howe Road Alt 4 45.0 D 39.6 D 39.6 D 41.7 D 41.9 D
Full 35.8 D 32.5 C 34.9 C 33.1 C 34.2 C
No Build 28.9 C 27.5 C 28.6 C 27.6 C 28.1 C
SR 82 Alt 1 31.4 C 27.9 C 32.0 C 28.2 C 30.0 C
Road) & Alt 3 21.9 C 22.6 C 22.1 C 22.3 C 22.2 C
I-71 SB Alt 4 24.8 C 25.0 C 25.2 C 24.9 C 25.1 C
Full 22.4 C 22.9 C 23.1 C 23.6 C 23.2 C
No Build 45.9 D 1.4 A 6.5 A 6.8 A
N/A
SR 82 Alt 1 42.9 D 2.0 A 6.9 A 7.6 A
Road) & Alt 3 41.9 D 4.0 A 5.8 A 8.3 A
I-71 NB Alt 4 45.0 D N/A 1.7 A 6.9 A 7.6 A
Full 39.1 D 3.1 A 6.4 A 7.6 A
No Build 20.7 C 25.6 C 19.7 B 20.3 C 20.9 C
SR 82 Alt 1 20.7 C 25.5 C 19.2 B 20.1 C 20.7 C
(Royalton
Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Road) &
Alt 3 19.8 B 25.4 C 15.5 B 21.9 C 20.0 B
W. 130th
Street Alt 4 20.7 C 25.5 C 17.9 B 20.0 C 20.3 C
Full 21.7 C 25.7 C 17.8 B 20.3 C 20.6 C
No Build 20.9 C 17.1 B 35.1 D 34.8 C 27.4 C
Alt 1 17.2 B 18.8 B 34.5 C 37.2 D 26.7 C
US 42 (Pearl
Alt 2 See “Alt 3"
Road) &
Boston Road Alt 3 17.2 B 18.8 B 34.5 C 37.2 D 26.7 C
Alt 4 16.6 B 18.5 B 34.6 C 37.8 D 26.7 C
Full 17.2 B 18.8 B 34.5 C 36.9 D 26.7 C
No Build 24.2 C 15.5 B 4.7 A 12.3 B
Alt 1 37.9 D 4.4 A 12.7 B 10.9 B
Howe Road N/A
& Boston
Road Alt 3 43.1 D 3.8 A 3.0 A 6.9 A
Alt 4 40.2 D 25.3 C 28.6 C 37.4 D 32.4 C
Full 25.3 C 37.1 D 20.9 C 30.6 C 25.2 C
Table 2 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build AM Peak,
cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
Ex. North No Build 28.3 C N/A 6.7 A 6.5 A 12.2 B
Carpenter Alt 1 34.0 C 29.1 C 5.8 A 7.1 A 17.7 B
Road / Prop. Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SB Ramp(s) Alt 3 29.6 C 14.1 B 23.5 C 20.2 C 23.8 C
& Boston Alt 4 39.8 D 4.8 A 4.9 A 11.6 B
Road N/A
Full 39.6 D 3.4 A 12.5 B 10.8 B
No Build 13.6 B 0.3 A N/A N/A
Ex. Benbow Alt 1 13.3 B 0.6 A N/A N/A
Road / Prop. N/A
Alt 2 48.2 D 4.6 A 10.2 B 9.8 A
NB Ramp(s)
& Boston Alt 3 N/A 8.1 A 8.4 A 8.2 A
Road Alt 4 15.6 C 0.7 A N/A N/A
Full 36.4 D N/A 13.6 B 18.4 B 19.3 B
No Build 16.6 B 15.2 B 37.4 D 43.1 D 24.6 C
Alt 1 16.7 B 14.8 B 36.5 D 44.8 D 24.5 C
W. 130th
Street &
Boston Road Alt 3 17.2 B 15.9 B 29.3 C 39.5 D 21.8 C
Alt 4 16.7 B 14.8 B 36.5 D 44.8 D 24.5 C
Full 17.2 B 15.6 B 31.1 C 38.3 D 22.8 C
No Build 36.4 D 18.5 C 30.5 C 41.9 D 33.2 C
Alt 1 51.1 D 17.3 B 23.2 C 27.6 C 31.8 C
Drake Road
& Howe
Road Alt 3 51.1 D 17.3 B 23.2 C 27.6 C 31.8 C
Alt 4 51.8 D 17.3 B 22.8 C 28.1 C 31.9 C
Full 51.8 D 17.3 B 22.6 C 25.6 C 31.4 C
No Build 12.4 B N/A 12.5 B 10.4 B 12.0 B
Drake Road Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
& Hunt Road Alt 3 12.7 B 10.8 B 10.7 B 11.4 B
Alt 4 13.0 B N/A 12.9 B 10.8 B 12.4 B
Full 12.4 B 10.8 B 10.8 B 11.3 B
No Build 13.3 B 13.5 B 14.7 B 16.2 B 14.6 B
North Alt 1 13.4 B 13.8 B 14.7 B 16.2 B 14.7 B
Carpenter Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Road & Alt 3 13.4 B 13.8 B 14.7 B 16.2 B 14.7 B
Grafton Road Alt 4 13.7 B 13.9 B 14.4 B 15.9 B 14.6 B
Full 13.4 B 13.6 B 14.4 B 16.1 B 14.5 B
Table 2 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build AM Peak,
cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
SR 303 No Build 28.7 C 26.6 C 24.6 C 27.1 C 25.9 C
(Center Alt 1 26.2 C 26.7 C 25.3 C 26.8 C 26.0 C
Road) & Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
North Alt 3 26.2 C 26.7 C 25.7 C 26.5 C 26.2 C
Carpenter Alt 4 26.2 C 25.9 C 25.4 C 27.6 C 26.1 C
Road Full 26.2 C 29.2 C 23.7 C 25.1 C 25.7 C
No Build 29.7 C 23.4 C 14.8 B 23.0 C
SR 303 N/A
(Center Alt 1 32.3 C 22.2 C 12.1 B 22.4 C
South Alt 3 22.4 C 18.2 B 13.6 B 18.1 B
Carpenter Alt 4 22.0 C N/A 18.5 B 14.2 B 18.4 B
Road Full 22.7 C 19.9 B 14.0 B 19.2 B
No Build 30.2 C 21.7 C 11.8 B 20.9 C
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 29.1 C 19.9 B 10.7 B 19.1 B
(Center Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Road) & Alt 3 29.1 C 13.0 B 10.4 B 14.4 B
I-71 SB Alt 4 N/A 33.7 C 23.0 C 12.6 B 22.9 C
Full 30.6 C 18.9 B 11.8 B 19.4 B
No Build 30.9 C 3.0 A 2.5 A 7.5 A
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 29.1 C 2.4 A 2.4 A 6.9 A
Road) & Alt 3 28.0 C 3.8 A 3.6 A 8.5 A
I-71 NB Alt 4 29.2 C N/A 2.4 A 2.4 A 6.5 A
Full 29.1 C 4.4 A 2.5 A 7.8 A
No Build 19.5 B 20.6 C 10.5 B 17.6 B 16.6 B
SR 303 Alt 1 19.5 B 20.6 C 10.9 B 18.0 B 16.8 B
Road) & W. Alt 3 19.4 B 20.4 C 11.1 B 18.2 B 16.9 B
130th Street Alt 4 19.5 B 20.5 C 10.9 B 18.0 B 16.8 B
Full 19.5 B 20.6 C 10.5 B 17.6 B 16.6 B
Table 3 – 2027 Opening Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build PM Peak
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
No Build 46.8 D 58.2 E 74.4 E 61.7 E 62.7 E
SR 82 Alt 1 45.7 D 54.6 D 64.5 E 61.3 E 59.2 E
Road) & Alt 3 37.5 D 56.6 E 63.3 E 70.8 E 62.2 E
Howe Road Alt 4 40.1 D 67.3 E 61.4 E 74.5 E 64.8 E
Full 59.7 E 67.7 E 64.8 E 56.6 E 60.2 E
No Build 31.0 C 31.2 C 34.9 C 35.9 C 33.8 C
SR 82 Alt 1 36.6 D 34.6 C 38.3 D 35.3 D 36.6 D
Road) & Alt 3 24.4 C 25.8 C 23.6 C 25.1 C 24.6 C
I-71 SB Alt 4 36.7 D 28.2 C 37.0 D 27.6 C 32.6 C
Full 24.0 C 25.7 C 26.5 C 29.7 C 27.0 C
No Build 46.2 D 7.9 A 8.2 A 11.9 B
N/A
SR 82 Alt 1 46.8 D 5.2 A 8.9 A 10.5 B
Road) & Alt 3 35.4 D 12.5 B 11.7 B 15.3 B
I-71 NB Alt 4 40.7 D N/A 7.6 A 8.8 A 11.2 B
Full 39.6 D 13.0 B 10.0 A 15.0 B
No Build 31.4 C 35.7 D 31.5 C 35.8 D 33.6 C
SR 82 Alt 1 31.1 C 36.5 D 32.1 C 36.0 D 34.0 C
(Royalton
Road) &
Alt 3 31.2 C 33.3 C 31.6 C 32.8 C 32.2 C
W. 130th
Street Alt 4 30.7 C 30.7 C 30.8 C 30.6 C 30.7 C
Full 29.4 C 29.7 C 29.7 C 29.5 C 29.6 C
No Build 44.0 D 34.9 C 54.2 D 44.0 D 42.9 D
Alt 1 28.9 C 30.2 C 40.9 D 38.6 D 33.8 C
US 42 (Pearl
Road) &
Boston Road Alt 3 28.9 C 30.2 C 40.9 D 38.6 D 33.8 C
Alt 4 26.6 C 35.8 D 37.4 D 35.6 D 33.3 C
Full 24.4 C 32.1 C 37.1 D 30.1 C 30.2 C
No Build 45.6 D 17.7 B 8.1 A 20.8 C
Alt 1 43.0 D 7.0 A 14.8 B 19.9 B
Howe Road N/A
& Boston
Road Alt 3 38.5 D 10.8 B 11.8 B 17.2 B
Alt 4 45.9 D 43.3 D 33.6 C 29.3 C 35.1 D
Full 30.4 C 38.2 D 19.9 B 28.1 C 27.2 C
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
Intersection Build L L Dela L Dela L L
Delay Delay Delay
O O y O y O O
(sec) (sec) (sec)
S S (sec) S (sec) S S
Ex. North No Build 30.5 C N/A 4.1 A 6.9 A 9.4 A
Carpenter Alt 1 27.3 C 14.5 B 13.4 B 29.8 C 18.9 B
Road / Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Prop. SB Alt 3 31.7 C 17.0 B 28.2 C 24.9 C 23.3 C
Ramp(s) & Alt 4 35.2 D 23.6 C 21.4 C 29.0 C
Boston Road N/A
Full 52.6 D 30.7 C 35.4 D 41.2 D
No Build N/A 15.5 C 0.7 A N/A N/A
Ex. Benbow Alt 1 N/A 18.0 C 1.0 A N/A N/A
Road /
Alt 2 N/A 47.5 D 11.4 B 15.4 B 20.3 C
Prop. NB
Ramp(s) & Alt 3 N/A N/A 4.2 A 3.9 A 4.1 A
Boston Road Alt 4 N/A 18.3 C 1.1 A N/A N/A
Full 34.6 C N/A 14.0 B 22.6 C 21.8 C
No Build 23.6 C 27.5 C 27.5 C 35.9 D 28.0 C
Alt 1 24.5 C 28.0 C 27.1 C 37.1 D 28.6 C
W. 130th
Street &
Boston Road Alt 3 25.7 C 30.1 C 27.1 C 37.1 D 29.8 C
Alt 4 24.5 C 28.0 C 27.1 C 37.1 D 28.6 C
Full 24.2 C 27.9 C 28.5 C 36.3 D 28.5 C
No Build 32.9 C 23.1 C 28.7 C 38.1 D 29.7 C
Alt 1 34.8 C 23.0 C 22.6 C 33.2 C 27.2 C
Drake Road
& Howe
Road Alt 3 34.8 C 23.0 C 22.6 C 33.2 C 27.2 C
Alt 4 35.3 D 23.2 C 22.6 C 33.9 C 27.4 C
Full 35.1 D 23.3 C 22.6 C 31.9 C 26.9 C
No Build 16.3 C N/A 42.8 E 19.8 C 30.2 D
Drake Road Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
& Hunt Road Alt 3 16.7 C 17.7 C 21.2 C 18.6 C
Alt 4 16.7 C N/A 17.7 C 21.2 C 18.6 C
Full 16.7 C 17.7 C 21.2 C 18.6 C
No Build 14.4 B 12.5 B 17.0 B 18.3 B 15.8 B
North Alt 1 14.6 B 12.7 B 20.7 C 22.6 C 18.1 B
Carpenter
Road &
Grafton Alt 3 14.6 B 12.7 B 20.7 C 22.6 C 18.1 B
Road Alt 4 14.7 B 12.8 B 16.7 B 17.7 B 15.7 B
Full 14.4 B 12.5 B 16.8 B 18.1 B 15.7 B
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
SR 303 No Build 35.1 D 26.7 C 25.1 C 34.0 C 29.8 C
(Center Alt 1 35.2 D 25.0 C 26.7 C 31.3 C 29.0 C
North Alt 3 37.2 D 24.3 C 28.2 C 35.9 D 31.3 C
Carpenter Alt 4 37.1 D 26.3 C 25.2 C 37.4 D 31.3 C
Road Full 33.6 C 25.8 C 25.2 C 33.0 C 29.1 C
No Build 27.3 C 21.4 C 15.5 B 19.1 B
SR 303 N/A
(Center Alt 1 27.3 C 22.0 C 19.0 B 21.1 C
South Alt 3 24.0 C 17.6 B 12.8 B 15.9 B
Carpenter Alt 4 25.8 C N/A 16.4 B 6.3 A 12.3 B
Road Full 26.2 C 16.9 B 6.2 A 12.5 B
No Build 29.7 C 10.5 B 10.5 B 14.0 B
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 29.4 C 8.9 A 12.0 B 13.6 B
Road) & Alt 3 28.0 C 9.4 A 10.8 B 13.0 B
I-71 SB Alt 4 N/A 29.4 C 18.5 B 9.8 A 16.6 B
Full 28.8 C 16.8 B 9.1 A 15.6 B
No Build 25.7 C 6.2 A 7.7 A 11.0 B
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 25.6 C 5.5 A 7.7 A 10.9 B
Road) & Alt 3 23.9 C 8.7 A 8.3 A 12.0 B
I-71 NB Alt 4 25.9 C N/A 7.0 A 7.8 A 11.4 B
Full 16.1 B 4.7 A 7.1 A 8.2 A
No Build 19.1 B 20.5 C 12.1 B 19.6 B 17.7 B
SR 303 Alt 1 19.0 B 20.7 C 12.4 B 20.2 C 18.1 B
Road) & W. Alt 3 19.1 B 20.7 C 12.2 B 19.8 B 17.8 B
130th Street Alt 4 19.0 B 20.6 C 12.4 B 20.1 C 18.0 B
Full 19.1 B 20.6 C 12.2 B 19.7 B 17.8 B
Table 4 – 2047 Design Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build AM Peak
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
No Build 47.0 D 43.8 D 49.0 D 47.5 D 47.6 D
SR 82 Alt 1 43.6 D 37.7 D 45.1 D 38.3 D 41.3 D
Road) & Alt 3 41.5 D 39.2 D 38.6 D 41.9 D 40.9 D
Howe Road Alt 4 44.8 D 43.6 D 43.7 D 44.8 D 44.5 D
Full 33.1 C 33.1 C 37.5 D 36.4 D 35.8 D
No Build 32.9 C 31.5 C 32.3 C 31.0 C 31.8 C
SR 82 Alt 1 25.6 C 24.1 C 25.3 C 23.9 C 24.7 C
(Royalton Alt 2 “See Alt 3”
Road) & Alt 3 25.6 C 24.1 C 25.3 C 23.9 C 24.7 C
I-71 SB Alt 4 26.2 C 25.7 C 26.3 C 25.1 C 25.8 C
Full 20.1 C 19.9 B 20.4 C 21.3 C 20.6 C
No Build 49.4 D 1.5 A 7.3 A 7.5 A
N/A
SR 82 Alt 1 42.9 D 2.6 A 7.1 A 8.0 A
Road) & Alt 3 45.4 D 5.5 A 6.3 A 9.8 A
I-71 NB Alt 4 49.3 D N/A 2.8 A 7.2 A 8.6 A
Full 39.1 D 2.8 A 6.4 A 7.4 A
No Build 23.5 C 25.7 C 21.1 C 23.5 C 23.1 C
SR 82 Alt 1 23.6 C 25.5 C 20.2 C 22.1 C 22.3 C
(Royalton
Road) &
Alt 3 19.0 B 27.3 C 17.9 B 26.5 C 22.5 C
W. 130th
Street Alt 4 24.0 C 25.4 C 19.8 B 21.5 C 22.1 C
Full 26.5 C 25.8 C 19.8 B 22.9 C 23.2 C
No Build 27.3 C 20.5 C 38.6 D 35.6 D 31.3 C
Alt 1 19.1 B 22.1 C 34.9 C 29.9 C 26.2 C
US 42 (Pearl
Road) &
Boston Road Alt 3 19.1 B 22.1 C 34.9 C 29.9 C 26.2 C
Alt 4 19.1 B 21.6 C 35.1 D 29.6 C 26.0 C
Full 20.9 C 19.7 B 38.0 D 34.9 C 28.5 C
No Build 29.1 C 11.0 B 2.6 A 9.5 A
Alt 1 37.8 D 37.4 D 21.6 C 31.4 C
Howe Road N/A
& Boston
Road Alt 3 48.2 D 4.6 A 10.5 B 10.0 A
Alt 4 48.7 D 39.1 D 27.3 C 34.6 C 34.8 C
Full 21.0 C 31.8 C 28.8 C 24.5 C 27.3 C
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
Intersection Build L L L Dela L L
Delay Delay Delay Delay
O O O y O O
(sec) (sec) (sec) (sec)
S S S (sec) S S
No Build 24.3 C N/A 6.6 A 7.5 A 11.5 B
Ex. North Alt 1 21.5 C 38.3 D 8.9 A 11.7 B 20.8 C
Carpenter
Road / Prop.
SB Ramp(s) & Alt 3 34.3 C 23.5 C 28.5 C 30.0 C 29.7 C
Boston Road Alt 4 43.2 D 18.2 B 8.3 A 20.8 C
N/A
Full 25.1 C 5.7 A 14.7 B 11.4 B
Ex. Benbow Alt 1 N/A 14.3 B 0.8 A N/A N/A
Road / Prop. Alt 2 N/A 57.5 E 3.4 A 7.2 A 6.6 A
NB Ramp(s) & Alt 3 N/A N/A 19.7 B 16.0 B 18.0 B
Boston Road Alt 4 N/A 19.4 C 1.0 A N/A N/A
Full 31.4 C N/A 20.1 C 30.6 C 26.6 C
No Build 17.4 B 15.8 B 37.8 D 42.6 D 25.2 C
Alt 1 18.3 B 17.1 B 31.0 C 38.1 D 23.4 C
W. 130th Street Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
& Boston Road Alt 3 18.3 B 17.1 B 29.2 C 40.6 D 22.6 C
Alt 4 18.3 B 17.1 B 31.0 C 38.1 D 23.4 C
Full 20.9 C 18.5 B 24.5 C 29.8 C 22.2 C
No Build 38.9 D 20.5 C 36.3 D 38.5 D 35.5 D
Alt 1 35.9 D 18.1 B 22.0 C 25.0 C 25.6 C
Drake Road & Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Howe Road Alt 3 35.9 D 18.1 B 22.0 C 25.0 C 25.6 C
Alt 4 40.4 D 18.5 B 20.9 C 23.7 C 26.2 C
Full 38.7 D 22.2 C 27.7 C 30.6 C 30.7 C
No Build 13.3 B N/A 13.2 B 10.7 B 12.7 B
Drake Road & Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Hunt Road Alt 3 12.8 B 10.8 B 10.7 B 11.4 B
Alt 4 13.9 B N/A 13.5 B 11.0 B 13.0 B
Full 12.6 B 11.0 B 10.9 B 11.5 B
No Build 14.8 B 15.3 B 14.2 B 15.9 B 15.0 B
North Alt 1 24.9 C 20.8 C 46.5 D 33.2 C 33.2 C
Carpenter Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Road & Alt 3 24.9 C 20.8 C 46.5 D 33.2 C 33.2 C
Grafton Road Alt 4 14.4 B 14.8 B 14.6 B 15.8 B 14.9 B
Full 14.2 B 14.9 B 14.0 B 15.8 B 14.7 B
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
SR 303 No Build 36.3 D 26.1 C 31.9 C 30.1 C 30.0 C
(Center Alt 1 31.0 C 28.7 C 30.3 C 26.7 C 29.1 C
North Alt 3 36.0 D 27.8 C 31.7 C 31.0 C 30.6 C
Carpenter Alt 4 48.7 D 35.1 D 25.6 C 17.2 B 26.7 C
Road Full 28.4 C 28.6 C 28.7 C 28.3 C 28.6 C
No Build 29.4 C 43.1 D 15.9 B 34.3 C
SR 303 N/A
(Center Alt 1 42.6 D 34.5 C 13.6 B 31.7 C
South Alt 3 27.6 C 24.9 C 17.1 B 23.6 C
Carpenter Alt 4 36.8 D N/A 18.2 B 11.4 B 20.4 C
Road Full 23.6 C 22.5 C 15.3 B 21.1 C
No Build 35.2 C 24.5 C 14.6 B 23.9 C
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 33.2 C 27.1 C 12.2 B 24.6 C
Road) & Alt 3 37.5 D 17.1 B 13.0 B 18.6 B
I-71 SB Alt 4 N/A 41.6 D 24.4 C 8.8 A 24.4 C
Full 32.2 C 32.7 C 13.3 B 28.7 C
No Build 36.8 D 2.6 A 3.1 A 8.6 A
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 32.7 C 2.2 A 2.8 A 7.6 A
Road) & Alt 3 35.4 D 5.1 A 4.3 A 10.7 B
I-71 NB Alt 4 47.9 D N/A 1.0 A 2.8 A 8.7 A
Full 30.5 C 4.5 A 2.7 A 8.3 A
No Build 19.2 B 20.5 C 11.9 B 19.1 B 17.4 B
SR 303 Alt 1 19.4 B 20.6 C 11.4 B 18.4 B 17.0 B
Road) & W. Alt 3 19.4 B 20.1 C 13.2 B 20.6 C 18.0 B
130th Street Alt 4 19.4 B 20.6 C 11.4 B 18.4 B 17.0 B
Full 19.7 B 20.8 C 11.0 B 19.5 B 17.1 B
Table 5 – 2047 Design Year Intersection Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build PM Peak
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
No Build 48.3 D 89.7 F 86.4 F 51.0 D 63.6 E
SR 82 Alt 1 49.0 D 65.0 E 58.5 E 58.9 E 57.9 E
Road) & Alt 3 42.3 D 67.0 E 67.1 E 69.0 E 64.3 E
Howe Road Alt 4 43.3 D 77.8 E 69.5 E 58.1 E 60.9 E
Full 81.6 F 68.7 E 70.4 E 80.1 F 77.0 E
No Build 32.6 C 36.0 C 40.4 D 36.2 D 37.3 D
SR 82 Alt 1 31.9 C 28.7 C 31.4 C 32.3 C 31.1 C
Road) & Alt 3 22.1 C 26.9 C 23.4 C 26.4 C 24.8 C
I-71 SB Alt 4 32.9 C 29.4 C 31.5 D 29.2 C 30.6 C
Full 25.7 C 30.9 C 25.9 C 31.5 C 28.6 C
No Build 45.5 D 7.7 A 9.1 A 12.2 B
N/A
SR 82 Alt 1 44.6 D 8.5 A 10.9 B 13.4 B
Road) & Alt 3 37.3 D 15.7 B 11.9 B 17.4 B
I-71 NB Alt 4 40.8 D N/A 9.4 A 10.7 B 13.3 B
Full 39.6 D 11.2 B 10.1 B 13.9 B
No Build 41.4 D 41.5 D 41.5 D 41.3 D 41.4 D
SR 82 Alt 1 40.7 D 40.8 D 41.6 D 41.4 D 41.2 D
(Royalton
Road) &
Alt 3 32.0 C 34.5 C 32.4 C 34.3 C 33.3 C
W. 130th
Street Alt 4 36.1 D 35.5 D 34.9 C 36.9 D 35.8 D
Full 31.4 C 32.3 C 31.6 C 32.3 C 31.9 C
No Build 61.7 E 40.5 D 63.6 E 60.1 E 55.4 E
Alt 1 32.9 C 39.3 D 39.3 D 32.6 D 35.6 D
US 42 (Pearl
Road) &
Boston Road Alt 3 32.9 C 39.3 D 39.3 D 32.6 C 35.6 D
Alt 4 34.1 C 37.1 D 38.3 D 33.1 C 35.2 D
Full 30.5 C 36.9 D 38.5 D 32.6 C 34.0 C
No Build 35.6 D 31.3 C 11.2 B 24.2 C
Alt 1 42.9 D 14.7 B 17.7 B 22.5 C
Howe Road N/A
& Boston
Road Alt 3 47.5 D 11.4 B 15.3 B 20.3 C
Alt 4 45.9 D 44.6 D 46.2 D 28.1 C 37.3 D
Full 33.5 C 38.3 D 36.9 D 34.4 C 35.7 D
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
Ex. North No Build 30.0 C N/A 7.8 A 10.7 B 12.6 B
Carpenter Alt 1 41.7 D 48.2 D 23.2 C 32.0 C 40.9 D
Road / Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Prop. SB Alt 3 27.5 C 35.7 D 30.1 C 33.3 C 32.7 C
Ramp(s) & Alt 4 33.3 C 9.3 A 27.1 C 26.3 C
Boston Road N/A
Full 35.2 D 25.4 C 32.7 C 31.7 C
Ex. Benbow Alt 1 N/A 20.6 C 1.3 A N/A N/A
Road /
Alt 2 N/A 51.9 D 13.3 B 6.9 A 12.8 B
Prop. NB
Ramp(s) & Alt 3 N/A N/A 2.2 A 2.7 A 2.4 A
Boston Road Alt 4 N/A 30.3 D 1.4 A N/A N/A
Full 43.7 D N/A 43.3 D 43.0 D 43.4 D
No Build 25.4 C 30.3 C 27.6 C 36.5 D 29.7 C
Alt 1 29.7 C 32.9 C 26.7 C 38.9 D 32.1 C
W. 130th
Street &
Boston Road Alt 3 27.7 C 30.8 C 28.5 C 38.8 D 31.1 C
Alt 4 29.7 C 32.9 C 26.7 C 38.9 D 32.1 C
Full 30.2 C 34.0 C 25.9 C 40.4 D 32.9 C
No Build 33.0 C 23.8 C 28.6 C 37.0 D 29.7 C
Alt 1 35.3 D 36.3 D 21.5 C 32.5 C 31.2 C
Drake Road
& Howe
Road Alt 3 35.3 D 36.3 D 21.5 C 32.5 C 31.2 C
Alt 4 35.0 C 35.7 D 22.6 C 37.0 D 32.4 C
Full 33.1 C 33.4 C 25.4 C 38.1 D 32.3 C
No Build 18.0 C N/A 55.5 F 22.3 C 37.3 E
Drake Road
& Hunt
Road Alt 3 20.0 C 20.4 C 24.8 C 21.6 C
Alt 4 18.2 C N/A 19.3 C 22.4 C 20.0 C
Full 18.3 C 19.5 C 23.6 C 20.5 C
No Build 16.5 B 14.0 B 16.5 B 18.1 B 16.5 B
North Alt 1 23.5 C 23.4 C 35.5 D 35.3 D 29.9 C
Carpenter
Road &
Grafton Alt 3 23.5 C 23.4 C 35.5 D 35.3 D 29.9 C
Road Alt 4 16.0 B 13.8 B 16.4 B 17.8 B 16.2 B
Full 17.0 B 14.7 B 22.0 C 23.8 C 19.9 B
Cont.
NB SB EB WB Overall
O O O O O
S S S S S
SR 303 No Build 41.5 D 30.0 C 27.9 C 41.1 C 34.6 C
(Center Alt 1 39.9 D 44.1 D 25.3 C 29.7 C 31.9 C
North Alt 3 35.7 D 43.4 D 25.7 C 30.4 C 31.7 C
Carpenter Alt 4 39.4 D 28.7 C 27.0 C 39.7 D 33.5 C
Road Full 34.4 C 27.4 C 26.6 C 33.4 C 30.1 C
No Build 29.3 C 21.6 C 16.6 B 19.8 B
SR 303 N/A
(Center Alt 1 41.2 D 10.0 B 7.8 A 12.3 B
South Alt 3 33.2 C 11.5 B 7.0 A 11.7 B
Carpenter Alt 4 29.0 C N/A 19.2 B 13.2 B 17.2 B
Road Full 28.3 C 18.7 B 9.6 A 15.2 B
No Build 30.0 C 19.1 B 14.6 B 19.2 B
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 37.4 D 9.2 A 5.8 A 12.0 B
Road) & Alt 3 35.4 D 8.2 A 5.5 A 11.2 B
I-71 SB Alt 4 N/A 30.2 C 10.0 B 15.1 B 15.8 B
Full 30.2 C 10.2 B 13.5 B 15.2 B
No Build 27.4 C 3.6 A 9.8 B 11.5 B
N/A
SR 303 Alt 1 31.0 C 4.1 A 10.6 B 13.1 B
(Center Alt 2 “See Alt 3”
Road) & Alt 3 29.1 C 5.1 A 10.9 B 13.1 B
I-71 NB Alt 4 28.2 C N/A 8.1 A 10.4 A 13.8 B
Full 26.7 C 7.2 A 8.7 A 12.1 B
No Build 18.7 B 20.5 C 14.0 B 21.5 C 18.7 B
SR 303 Alt 1 18.5 B 20.2 C 14.3 B 22.6 C 19.2 B
Road) & W. Alt 3 18.8 B 20.5 C 13.7 B 21.5 C 18.6 B
130th Street Alt 4 18.6 B 20.8 C 14.4 B 22.8 C 19.4 B
Full 18.8 B 20.7 C 13.8 B 21.2 C 18.6 B
Freeway Section/Ramp Junction Analyses:
The existing and proposed study area freeway segments and ramp junctions were analyzed as
a freeway facility using Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for the peak hours for both 2027 and
2047 volumes. The analyses were conducted based on guidance and criteria provided in the
ODOT OATS Manual. For northbound between the SR 303 eastbound entrance to I-71 and SR 303
westbound entrance to I-71, the ramp influence areas are adjacent to one another. Therefore,
this section is not analyzed separately in HCS and is not included in the tables below.
The analysis density in passenger car per mile per lane (pc/mi/ln) and LOS results are organized
by design year and direction of flow on Tables 6 through 9 for freeway segments and Tables 10
through 13 for ramp junctions. Within each table, the AM and PM peak results for each
alternative are organized by segment or ramp in the direction of travel, for comparison of
overall operations performance. Additionally, refer to Appendix G for comparisons of change in
LOS performance between an alternative and No Build conditions.
The level of service comparison figures provided in Appendix G show if the letter grade LOS is
different than in the No Build condition. A comparison result for proposed new ramps are not
shown in this exhibit since they have no existing condition to compare to. It should also be
noted that many of the freeway segments/ramp junctions that were different than the No Build
condition were observed to have only a slight change in density. For example, a high C may
have changed to a low D but only changed by two pc/mi/ln.
The HCS reports for the freeway facility are provided in Appendix M.
Table 6 – 2027 Opening Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
Northbound
AM Peak PM Peak
Freeway Segment Condition Density Density
LOS LOS
(pc/mi/ln) (pc/mi/ln)
No Build 13.1 B 11.2 B
Alt 1 See “No Build”
South of SR 303
Alt 3 11.7 B 10.8 A
Full Build 13.0 B 11.3 B
No Build 10.9 A 8.3 A
Between exit to SR 303 and Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 303 EB Entrance Alt 3 9.3 A 8.0 A
Full Build 10.9 A 8.5 B
No Build See “Between SR 82 and Boston Road”
Between Boston Road and Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 303 Alt 3 13.6 B 11.0 A
No Build
Alt 1
Alt 2 N/A
Between Boston Road Ramps
Alt 3
Alt 4
Full Build 14.0 B 9.3 A
Between SR 82 and Alt 2 20.5 C 13.9 B
Boston Road Alt 3 20.5 C 13.9 B
Full Build 20.1 C 12.2 B
Northbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
Between exit to SR 82 Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
and
Alt 3 19.4 C 11.5 B
SR 82 EB entrance
Full Build 19.2 C 10.3 A
No Build 24.2 C 16.3 B
Between SR 82 EB Alt 2 25.5 C 16.5 B
entrance and SR 82 WB
Alt 3 25.5 C 16.5 B
entrance
No Build 30.6 D 19.8 C
Alt 2 30.6 D 19.9 C
North of SR 82
Alt 3 30.6 D 19.9 C
Full Build 31.8 D 18.7 C
Southbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
No Build 12.6 B 23.6 C
Alt 1 12.7 B 24.7 C
North of SR 82
Alt 3 12.7 B 24.7 C
Alt 4 11.5 B 23.5 C
Full Build 11.4 B 24.4 C
Alt 1 12.1 B 25.2 C
Between exit to SR 82 WB Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
and exit to SR 82 EB Alt 3 12.1 A 25.2 C
Alt 4 10.5 A 22.8 C
Full Build 10.6 A 23.2 C
No Build 9.3 A 16.9 B
Alt 1 10.1 A 21.1 C
Between exit to SR 82 EB and Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 82 entrance Alt 3 10.1 A 21.1 C
Alt 4 8.5 A 19.0 C
No Build 10.9 A 19.9 C
Alt 1 11.7 B 24.9 C
Between SR 82 and Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Boston Road Alt 3 11.7 A 24.9 C
Alt 4 9.9 A 22.0 C
No Build
Alt 1
N/A
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4 8.0 A 14.7 B
Southbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
No Build See “Between SR 82 & Boston Road”
Alt 1 9.6 A 16.9 B
SR 303 Alt 3 9.6 A 16.9 B
Alt 4 11.9 B 18.0 B
Alt 1 7.1 A 13.7 B
Between SR 303 Ramps
Alt 3 7.1 A 13.7 B
Alt 4 8.2 A 14.1 B
Alt 1 9.7 A 16.4 B
South of SR 303
Alt 3 9.7 A 16.4 B
Alt 4 10.0 A 16.7 B
Table 8 – 2047 Design Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results –No Build & Build
Northbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
South of SR 303
Alt 3 12.6 B 11.5 B
No Build 10.9 A 8.3 A
SR 303 EB Entrance Alt 3 10.1 B 8.3 A
No Build See “Between SR 82 and Boston Road”
SR 303 Alt 3 14.4 B 11.4 B
No Build
Alt 1
Alt 2 N/A
Alt 3
Alt 4
Full Build 14.7 B 9.4 A
Boston Road Alt 3 21.8 C 14.7 B
Table 8 – 2047 Design Year Freeway Segment Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
Northbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
SR 82 EB entrance Alt 3 20.5 C 12.3 B
Full Build 20.4 C 11.0 A
Between SR 82 EB entrance Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
and SR 82 WB entrance Alt 3 27.7 D 17.3 B
Full Build 27.5 D 16.0 B
Alt 2 33.3 D 20.8 C
North of SR 82
Alt 3 33.3 D 20.8 C
Full Build 33.7 D 19.4 C
Southbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
Alt 1 13.4 B 26.8 D
North of SR 82
Alt 3 13.4 B 26.8 D
Alt 4 11.8 B 24.9 C
Full Build 11.7 B 26.3 D
Alt 1 13.0 A 27.5 D
Between exit to SR 82 WB Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
and exit to SR 82 EB Alt 3 13.0 B 27.5 D
Alt 4 10.9 A 24.4 C
Alt 1 10.9 A 22.9 C
Between exit to SR 82 EB and Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 82 entrance Alt 3 10.9 A 22.9 C
Alt 4 8.9 A 20.2 C
Alt 1 12.8 B 27.2 D
Boston Road Alt 3 12.8 B 27.2 D
Alt 4 10.5 A 23.6 C
No Build
Alt 1
N/A
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 4 8.1 A 14.7 B
Southbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
No Build See “Between SR 82 & Boston Road”
Alt 1 10.1 A 17.0 B
SR 303 Alt 3 10.1 A 17.0 B
Alt 4 13.0 B 18.6 C
Alt 1 7.3 A 13.7 B
Between SR 303 Ramps
Alt 3 7.3 A 13.7 B
Alt 4 8.8 A 14.7 B
No Build 10.2 A 18.7 C
Alt 1 10.4 A 16.9 B
South of SR 303
Alt 3 10.4 A 16.9 B
Alt 4 10.9 A 17.7 B
Table 10 – 2027 Opening Year Ramp Junction Capacity Analysis Results – No Build & Build
Northbound
AM Peak PM Peak
Ramp Junction Condition Density Density
LOS LOS
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 303 Alt 3 14.7 B 13.9 B
SR 303 Eastbound Merge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
I-71 Northbound Alt 3 14.9 B 10.9 B
SR 303 Westbound Merge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
No Build
Alt 1
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 N/A
Boston Road Alt 3
Alt 4
No Build N/A
Alt 1 N/A
Boston Road Merge to I-71 Alt 2 25.5 C 16.4 B
Northbound Alt 3 25.5 C 16.7 B
Alt 4 N/A
Northbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 24.0 C 17.9 B
SR 82 Alt 3 24.3 C 17.9 B
SR 82 Eastbound Merge to Alt 2 24.2 C 16.5 B
I-71 Northbound Alt 3 24.2 C 16.5 B
No Build 28.2 D 19.0 B
SR 82 Westbound Merge to Alt 2 27.6 C 19.2 B
I-71 Northbound Alt 3 27.6 D 19.2 B
Southbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
Alt 1 2.7 A 12.7 B
I-71 Southbound Diverge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 82 Westbound Alt 3 2.7 A 12.7 B
Alt 4 2.2 A 12.8 B
Alt 1 16.9 B 29.6 D
SR 82 Eastbound Alt 3 16.9 B 29.6 D
Alt 4 15.1 B 27.9 C
Alt 1 11.9 B 24.9 C
SR 82 Merge to I-71 Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
Southbound Alt 3 11.9 B 24.9 C
Alt 4 10.0 A 22.2 C
No Build N/A
Alt 1 12.1 B 26.6 C
Boston Road Alt 3 12.1 B 26.6 C
Alt 4 9.9 A 24.2 C
Southbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
No Build
Alt 1
N/A
Boston Road Merge to I-71 Alt 2
Southbound Alt 3
Alt 4 14.6 B 20.3 C
Alt 1 13.9 B 22.2 C
SR 303 Alt 3 13.9 B 22.2 C
Alt 4 17.1 B 23.7 C
Alt 1 10.4 B 17.0 B
Southbound Alt 3 10.4 B 17.0 B
Alt 4 10.4 B 17.3 B
Northbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 303 Alt 3 15.7 B 14.8 B
SR 303 Eastbound Merge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
SR 303 Westbound Merge to Alt 2 See “Alt 3”
No Build
Alt 1
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 N/A
Boston Road Alt 3
Alt 4
No Build N/A
Alt 1 N/A
Boston Road Merge to I-71 Alt 2 27.0 C 17.8 B
Northbound Alt 3 27.0 C 19.4 B
Alt 4 N/A
Northbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
I-71 Northbound Diverge to Alt 2 25.2 C 18.8 B
SR 82 Alt 3 25.2 C 18.8 B
SR 82 Eastbound Merge to Alt 2 26.0 C 17.2 B
I-71 Northbound Alt 3 26.0 C 17.2 B
SR 82 Westbound Merge to Alt 2 29.1 D 20.0 B
I-71 Northbound Alt 3 29.1 D 20.0 B
Southbound
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
Alt 1 3.1 A 14.5 B
SR 82 Westbound Alt 3 3.1 A 14.5 B
Alt 4 2.4 A 13.9 B
Alt 1 17.8 B 31.1 D
SR 82 Eastbound Alt 3 17.8 B 31.1 D
Alt 4 15.5 B 29.2 D
Alt 1 13.0 B 26.6 C
Southbound Alt 3 13.0 B 26.6 C
Alt 4 10.6 B 23.5 C
No Build N/A
Alt 1 13.5 B 28.8 D
Boston Road Alt 3 13.5 B 28.8 D
Alt 4 10.8 B 26.0 C
Southbound, cont.
AM Peak PM Peak
LOS LOS
No Build
Alt 1
N/A
Boston Road Merge to I-71 Alt 2
Southbound Alt 3
Alt 4 16.3 B 21.2 C
Alt 1 14.5 B 22.4 C
SR 303 Alt 3 14.5 B 22.4 C
Alt 4 18.7 B 24.3 C
Alt 1 11.4 B 17.7 B
Southbound Alt 3 11.4 B 17.7 B
Alt 4 11.4 B 18.4 B
APPENDIX K
LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON EXHIBITS

N
BOSTON ROAD 2047 LOS COMPARISON EXHIBIT AM/PM - ALTERN

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N

INTERCHANGE
N
BOSTON ROAD 2047 LOS COMPARISON EXHIBIT AM/PM - FULL

INTERCHANGE
APPENDIX L
HCS ANALYSIS – INTERSECTIONS
Note: Traffic volumes may not change for every intersection for every alternative. Therefore,
intersection results may reference other alternatives. Refer to Table 2 through Table 5 for
which alternatives are referenced and therefore do not have reports in their respective
sections in this Appendix.
2027
AM PEAK
NO BUILD
HCS Signalized Intersection Results Summary
General Information Intersection Information

Agency Euthenics, Inc. Duration, h 0.250
Analyst Logan Sasse Analysis Date May 8, 2023 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction Strongsville Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.93
Urban Street SR 82 Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 A…
Project Description No-Build 2027 AM
Demand Information EB WB NB SB
Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1010 20 420 1000 80 80 40 990 80 20 30
Signal Information
Cycle, s 110.0 Reference Phase 2
1 2 3 4
Offset, s 0 Reference Point End
Green 23.6 23.0 4.4 9.9 19.1 0.0
Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 5 6 7 8
Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 4
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.4 39.4 29.6 58.6 25.1 15.9
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.3 3.2
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 3.0 22.8 21.1 4.5
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2
Phase Call Probability 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.99
Max Out Probability 0.76 0.54 1.00 0.00
Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB

Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14
Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 32 660 447 654 1557 125 86 43 1065 86 22 32
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1716 1382 1872 1697 1676 1580 1682 1939 1454 1766 1753 1435
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.0 24.0 24.0 20.8 49.9 6.2 4.9 2.1 19.1 2.5 1.2 2.2
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 1.0 24.0 24.0 20.8 49.9 6.2 4.9 2.1 19.1 2.5 1.2 2.2
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.48 0.57 0.17 0.17 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 137 840 569 728 1604 897 293 337 1130 317 157 186
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.236 0.786 0.786 0.899 0.971 0.139 0.294 0.128 0.942 0.272 0.137 0.174
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 20 355.7 452.3 369.4 782.6 190.8 97.5 44.1 545.6 50.2 24.5 30.6
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.8 13.6 18.1 14.3 29.2 7.5 3.6 1.8 21.8 2.0 1.0 1.2
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.10 0.44 0.59 0.59 1.07 1.06 0.34 0.07 2.27 0.26 0.09 0.11
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 51.2 35.0 35.0 44.3 29.1 26.1 39.6 38.4 32.5 46.7 46.1 15.4
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 7.3 10.5 8.9 14.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 14.8 0.2 0.1 0.2
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 51.5 42.3 45.5 53.3 43.5 26.3 39.8 38.4 47.3 46.9 46.3 15.5
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D D C D D D D D B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 43.8 D 45.3 D 46.4 D 39.6 D
Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 45.1 D
Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.44 B 2.47 B 2.74 C 2.60 C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.11 A 1.82 B 2.46 B 0.72 A
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Streets Version 2023 Generated: 5/9/2023 8:59:20 AM

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 A…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1910 170 130 700 0 400 0 800
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 24.0 30.0 20.0 18.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 30.0 66.0 26.0 62.0 18.0 18.0

Assigned Movement 5 2 12 1 6 8 18 4 14
Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 1 2053 183 269 1447 0 444 0 889
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1810 1282 1472 1682 1727 1754 1249 1795 1325
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.1 57.0 4.8 17.5 20.5 0.0 15.6 0.0 18.0
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 0.1 57.0 4.8 17.5 20.5 0.0 15.6 0.0 18.0
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.22 0.55 0.55 0.18 0.51 0.16 0.35 0.16 0.38
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 395 2097 803 306 2638 287 863 294 1518
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.003 0.979 0.228 0.878 0.549 0.000 0.515 0.000 0.586
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.2 530 69 403.2 316.3 0 209.1 0 267
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.0 20.7 2.6 15.0 12.2 0.0 8.1 0.0 10.1
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.01 0.72 0.13 1.68 0.30 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.34
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 39.6 21.5 8.1 51.0 17.7 0.0 28.7 0.0 27.1
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.0 8.8 0.3 25.9 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 39.6 30.4 8.4 76.9 18.4 0.0 28.9 0.0 27.5
Level of Service (LOS) D C A E B C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.6 C 27.6 C 28.9 C 27.5 C
Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.1 C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.76 B 0.99 A 1.22 A 1.95 B

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 A…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 580 1730 1510 120 0 220
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 79.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assigned Phase 2 6 8
Case Number 7.0 8.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 85.8 85.8 24.2
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 0.0 3.3
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 17.4
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.8
Phase Call Probability 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00

Assigned Movement 2 12 6 3 8 18
Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 627 1870 1589 126 0 232
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1950 1637 1719 1770 1612
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 6.3 14.4 7.3 0.0 15.4
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 6.3 14.4 7.3 0.0 15.4
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.73 0.73 0.17 0.17 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2830 3565 284 292 266
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.222 0.446 0.445 0.000 0.870
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 93.9 197 145.5 0 260.9
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 3.6 7.6 5.6 0.0 10.4
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.10 0.20 0.66 0.00 1.19
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 5.5 6.1 41.4 0.0 44.8
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.4
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 5.6 0.0 6.5 41.8 0.0 48.2
Level of Service (LOS) A A A D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 1.4 A 6.5 A 45.9 D 0.0
Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 6.8 A
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.05 B 1.34 A 2.32 B 2.47 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.49 B 1.36 A 1.08 A

Jurisdiction Strongsville/North Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.88
Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2027 AM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 430 130 70 640 40 210 170 60 30 130 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.4 20.1 3.3 3.7 15.3 0.0
Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0
Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.4 26.1 9.4 26.1 11.0 23.0 7.3 19.3
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.2
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 4.0 14.2 4.0 14.3 9.0 7.7 3.1 12.0
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.1 1.9 0.0 3.1 0.0 1.1 0.1 1.1
Phase Call Probability 0.77 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.47 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.51 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 80 489 148 80 390 382 239 193 68 34 307
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1717 1165 1578 1675 1849 1811 1745 1862 1439 1607 1920
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 2.0 12.2 4.0 2.0 12.3 12.3 7.0 5.7 2.2 1.1 10.0
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 2.0 12.2 4.0 2.0 12.3 12.3 7.0 5.7 2.2 1.1 10.0
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.41 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.34 0.26 0.34 0.26 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 332 709 647 324 563 552 353 482 492 351 391
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.240 0.689 0.228 0.246 0.693 0.693 0.676 0.401 0.139 0.097 0.784
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 32.2 152.1 57.5 34.1 222.8 209.3 134.6 103.9 32 19.7 194.7
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.2 5.8 2.3 1.2 8.5 8.4 5.3 4.1 1.2 0.7 7.8
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.15 0.10 0.26 0.12 0.20 0.20 1.12 0.11 0.25 0.09 0.02
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 14.3 20.3 12.7 14.7 20.3 20.3 18.3 20.3 15.1 18.9 25.0
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 4.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.3
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 14.4 22.6 12.8 14.9 20.9 20.9 22.4 20.5 15.1 18.9 26.3
Level of Service (LOS) B C B B C C C C B B C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.7 B 20.3 C 20.7 C 25.6 C
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.10 B 1.91 B 2.27 B 2.43 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.08 A 1.19 A 1.31 A 1.05 A
HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary

Agency TranSystems Duration, h 0.250
Analyst SNP Analysis Date 3/20/2023 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.92
Urban Street Pearl Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - No Build
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 210 40 110 190 80 70 300 150 30 140 20
Signal Information
Green 6.0 29.5 3.9 6.0 0.7 16.5
Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.5
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.5 22.0 12.1 22.7 11.5 46.5 9.4 44.4
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 5.0 14.8 6.7 16.1 4.3 2.0
Phase Call Probability 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.56
Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.25 0.18 0.26 0.19 0.42 0.46 0.35 0.43 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 212 336 260 344 548 816 369 808 803
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 56.8 242 90.5 257.9 41.2 310 23.1 89.2 9.9
Level of Service (LOS) C D C D B C C B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.1 D 34.8 C 20.9 C 17.1 B
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Streets Version 7.9.5 Generated: 5/10/2023 3:27:40 PM

Urban Street Boston Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 350 250 160 70 0 50
Signal Information
Green 41.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16 7 4 14
Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 678 494 133
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1156 1720 1694
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 22.7 7.1 4.4
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 29.8 7.1 4.4
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.68 0.68 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 877 1178 252
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.773 0.419 0.530
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 265.4 75.5 75.4
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 10.4 2.9 3.0
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 8.9 3.8 23.6
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 6.6 0.9 0.6
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 15.5 4.7 24.2
Level of Service (LOS) B A C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.5 B 4.7 A 0.0 24.2 C
Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 12.3 B
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.32 A 1.32 A 1.71 B 1.72 B

Intersection N Carpenter Road File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 300 130 90 250 160 0 90
Signal Information
Green 37.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 326 141 410 301
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1900 1610 1599 1678
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 5.4 3.0 1.0 10.4
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 5.4 3.0 6.6 10.4
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1183 1003 1072 354
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.275 0.141 0.382 0.852
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 74.2 34.4 90.6 196.1
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 3.0 1.4 3.6 7.6
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 6.3 6.8 5.5 22.8
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 0.2 1.0 5.5
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 6.6 6.9 6.5 28.3
Level of Service (LOS) A A A C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 6.7 A 6.5 A 28.3 C 0.0
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.34 A 1.16 A 0.98 A
HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report
General Information Site Information
Analyst SNP Intersection Boston and Benbow
Agency/Co. TranSystems Jurisdiction
Date Performed 3/20/2023 East/West Street Boston
Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Benbow
Time Analyzed AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.88
Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25
Project Description No Build
Lanes
Major Street: East-West
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments

Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R
Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR LR
Volume (veh/h) 10 380 340 10 10 10
Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0
Proportion Time Blocked
Percent Grade (%) 0
Right Turn Channelized
Median Type | Storage Undivided
Critical and Follow-up Headways

Base Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.1 6.2
Critical Headway (sec) 4.10 6.40 6.20
Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3
Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.20 3.50 3.30
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 11 23
Capacity, c (veh/h) 1172 441
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.05
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.0 0.2
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 13.6
Level of Service (LOS) A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.3 13.6
Approach LOS B
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ TWSC Version 7.9.5 Generated: 5/10/2023 1:17:19 PM
Boston and Benbow_2027 AM_No Build.xtw

Urban Street W 130th Street Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 130 40 60 50 80 30 450 80 50 270 110
Signal Information
Green 4.2 38.9 5.5 5.9 2.0 10.7
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.9 23.7 11.4 16.2 9.7 54.0 11.0 55.3

Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 239 185 65 141 33 295 282 54 214 199
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1795 1823 1810 1711 1810 1885 1786 1810 1870 1688
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 11.4 9.2 3.1 8.0 1.0 9.5 9.6 0.0 6.5 6.7
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 11.4 9.2 3.1 8.0 1.0 9.5 9.6 0.0 6.5 6.7
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.26 0.18 0.17 0.11 0.45 0.49 0.49 0.42 0.50 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 345 331 262 182 465 915 867 484 932 841
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.694 0.558 0.249 0.775 0.070 0.322 0.325 0.112 0.229 0.237
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 227.6 183.8 61.6 156.6 18.3 187.8 179 33.9 126.2 117.1
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 9.0 7.4 2.5 6.3 0.7 7.5 7.2 1.4 5.0 4.7
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.88 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 32.2 37.3 36.2 43.5 15.8 15.7 15.7 17.8 14.2 14.3
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 4.8 0.6 0.2 2.7 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.7
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 37.0 37.8 36.4 46.2 15.8 16.6 16.7 17.8 14.8 14.9
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D B B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.4 D 43.1 D 16.6 B 15.2 B

Urban Street Howe Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 240 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 60 70 100
Signal Information
Green 48.8 6.3 24.7 18.2 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 30.2 53.9 23.7 54.3 11.8 66.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.40 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.41 0.41 0.44 0.50 0.71
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 466 746 225 286 244 579 770 267 959 1135
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 368 259.1 13.1 288 184.4 28.7 545.2 80.9 52.1 38.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C D D C C D D B A
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 30.5 C 41.9 D 36.4 D 18.5 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.67 B 1.22 A 1.50 B 0.92 A
HCS7 All-Way Stop Control Report
Analyst SNP Intersection Drake and Hunt
Date Performed 4/24/2023 East/West Street Drake
Analysis Year 2027 North/South Street Hunt
Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.85
Time Analyzed AM Peak
Lanes
Vehicle Volume and Adjustments

Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R
Volume 210 100 10 160 220 20
% Thrus in Shared Lane
Lane L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3
Configuration TR LT LR
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 365 200 282
Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 2 1
Departure Headway and Service Time

Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20
Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.324 0.178 0.251
Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 4.87 5.26 5.45
Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.493 0.292 0.427
Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 2.87 3.26 3.45
Capacity, Delay and Level of Service

Capacity 739 684 661
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 2.8 1.2 2.1
Control Delay (s/veh) 12.5 10.4 12.4
Level of Service, LOS B B B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.5 10.4 12.4
Approach LOS B B B
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 12.0 B
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ AWSC Version 7.9.5 Generated: 5/11/2023 10:55:38 AM
Drake and Hunt_2027 AM_No Build.xaw

Urban Street Carpenter Road Analysis Year 2027 Analysis Period 1> 7:00
Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 310 110 150 200 40 50 110 90 40 180 70
Signal Information
Green 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assigned Phase 4 8 2 6
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.4 3.4 0.0 0.0
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 14.1 24.2
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 2.1 0.9 0.0 0.0
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.05 1.00

Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 76 457 163 261 54 217 43 272
Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1101 1772 927 1773 1108 1744 1182 1795
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 3.0 12.1 10.1 6.0 2.1 5.0 1.5 6.2
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 9.1 12.1 22.2 6.0 8.4 5.0 6.5 6.2
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 468 739 319 739 466 726 514 747
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.162 0.618 0.511 0.353 0.117 0.299 0.085 0.364
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.9 194.6 92.9 95.6 24.8 84.4 18.4 109.1
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.2 7.6 3.6 3.7 1.0 3.4 0.7 4.3
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.07 0.00
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 15.1 13.7 22.4 12.0 14.9 11.7 13.8 12.0
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.5 1.1 0.3 1.4
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 15.1 14.6 22.9 12.1 15.4 12.7 14.2 13.4
Level of Service (LOS) B B C B B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.7 B 16.2 B 13.3 B 13.5 B

Jurisdiction Brunswick Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.93
Intersection SR 303 & N Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027…
Project Description SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 900 10 30 630 90 20 30 30 340 40 280
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.6 3.9 24.5 2.5 1.5 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.5 34.4 8.6 30.5 8.5 16.0 16.0 23.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.13 0.29 0.23 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 403 691 688 226 604 577 332 232 485 432 499
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 61 321 307.8 11.4 222.5 209.8 14.6 45.8 68.4 26.4 197.4
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C C C C C C C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.40 A 1.15 A 0.63 A 1.66 B

Intersection SR 303 & S Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1470 50 80 410 130 410
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.8 33.2 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 39.2 11.8 51.0 24.0

Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln 1548 1590 1870 1798 1804 1644
Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 29.8 0.2 1.6 7.2 4.5 17.5
Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 29.8 0.2 1.6 7.2 4.5 17.5
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.68 0.55 0.60 0.24 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1370 1086 260 2158 433 521
Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) 0.964 0.041 0.324 0.200 0.306 0.802
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 259.7 3 27.4 135 84.9 297
Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) 10.1 0.1 1.1 5.2 3.3 11.9
Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.52 0.04 0.11 0.36 0.21 0.49
Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 11.7 1.3 16.5 14.2 23.4 23.4
Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 12.5 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 8.2
Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Level of Service (LOS) C A B B C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 23.4 C 14.8 B 29.7 C 0.0
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.77 B 0.90 A F

Intersection SR 303 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1480 400 90 440 310 0 50
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.0 35.8 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 41.8 12.0 53.8 21.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.48 0.58 0.64 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1394 255 2295 389 312
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 349.4 34.5 103.3 240 34.2
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 21.7 C 11.8 B 0.0 30.2 C
Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.37 A 1.64 B 2.30 B 2.30 B

Intersection SR 303 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 740 1050 310 300 220 0 220
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 49.2 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.66 0.66 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2141 2311 314 283
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 92.1 35 182.3 178.4
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A C C

Jurisdiction Brunswick/Hinckley Time Period AM Peak PHF 0.89
Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St No-Build 2027 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 160 240 40 20 270 70 50 110 30 110 140 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.5 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assigned Phase 5 2 6 8 4
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.5 25.5 25.9 25.9
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.2 8.7 7.4 18.1 14.4
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 1.2 0.7 1.6 1.4
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 1.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 506 909 439 565 525 219 566 404 527
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 66.1 102.1 9.8 94.6 89.1 38.6 72.3 68 201.5
Level of Service (LOS) B A B B B C B C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.5 B 17.6 B 19.5 B 20.6 C
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Streets Version 2023 Generated: 5/8/2023 12:48:51 PM
2027
AM PEAK
ALTERNATIVE 1 – SOUTHBOUND EXIT ONLY

Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Alternative 1 20…
Project Description Alternative 1 - 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1040 20 410 900 80 80 40 950 80 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 22.6 21.1 4.3 9.8 17.2 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.3 37.4 28.6 55.7 23.2 15.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.22 0.47 0.57 0.16 0.16 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 140 850 559 732 1588 896 275 317 1103 331 164 193
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 18.9 358.7 448.6 379.1 588.6 38.4 94 42.4 496.2 47.3 23.1 26.4
Level of Service (LOS) D D D E C A D D D D D B

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Alternative 1 20…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1890 180 140 680 0 390 0 710
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 24.0 31.0 19.0 13.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 30.0 67.0 25.0 62.0 13.0 13.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.23 0.58 0.58 0.18 0.53 0.12 0.30 0.12 0.35
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 414 2197 855 304 2751 217 759 222 1392
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.2 552.8 192.3 449.3 277.1 0 208.4 0 236.8
Level of Service (LOS) D C C F B C C

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Alternative 1 20…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 640 1640 1370 260 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 73.9 19.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.70 0.70 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2751 3421 313 322 290

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 1 2027 AM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 1 - 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 420 140 70 650 40 210 170 60 30 130 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.4 20.1 3.3 3.7 14.8 0.0
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.4 26.1 9.4 26.1 11.0 22.5 7.3 18.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.41 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.25 0.34 0.25 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 332 699 653 329 568 556 356 472 484 345 380
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.6 146.1 61.3 33.5 223.1 209.6 133.8 104 32.1 19.7 187.2

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only…
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - Partial Build SB Exit Only
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 220 50 120 190 80 70 310 150 30 160 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 26.4 4.2 6.2 0.6 18.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 24.4 12.3 25.0 11.7 43.6 9.7 41.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.21 0.08 0.22 0.38 0.42 0.50 0.32 0.40 0.47
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 225 383 266 391 474 804 804 428 751 757
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 61.2 283.5 69.8 278.2 49.7 243.2 61 24.5 126 12
Level of Service (LOS) C D D D B C A C B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.5 C 37.2 D 17.2 B 18.8 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.17 A 1.27 A 1.55 B 0.91 A
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Streets Version 7.9.5 Generated: 5/24/2023 10:47:23 AM

Analyst SNP Analysis Date Mar 20, 2023 Area Type Other
Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 350 260 150 70 50
Signal Information
Green 7.2 55.2 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.2 74.4 61.2 15.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.72 0.76 0.61 0.61 0.11 0.11
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 777 1421 1128 956 187 167
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 34.3 39.8 98.4 55.5 40.1 28.3
Level of Service (LOS) A A B B D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 4.4 A 12.7 B 0.0 37.9 D

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 160 70 190 150 90 50 200 90
Signal Information
Green 58.2 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 64.2 64.2 25.8 25.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1209 1024 721 1190 279 352 466 773 344
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 41.2 28.4 16.4 37.2 85.6 43.4 23.8 49.2 44.5
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D C C C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 5.8 A 7.1 A 34.0 C 29.1 C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.24 A 0.95 A F 0.79 A
Project Description Partial Build SB Exit Only
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 20 380 260 20 20 20
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.02 0.09
Approach LOS B
Boston and Benbow_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit O…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 130 40 60 60 80 30 450 80 50 280 120
Signal Information
Green 4.2 1.3 48.2 5.9 2.0 11.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.9 24.0 11.4 16.5 9.7 53.7 11.0 54.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.26 0.19 0.17 0.11 0.52 0.48 0.48 0.54 0.49 0.49
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 342 338 267 189 537 908 860 498 925 831
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 223.1 182.8 61.3 174.6 15.2 189.8 180.9 24.7 135.7 125

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 250 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 60 70 100
Signal Information
Green 29.4 5.7 18.8 14.1 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.3 43.8 19.6 34.9 11.2 46.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.45 0.66
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 497 788 249 295 252 486 619 202 859 1055
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 283.7 195.8 9.4 229.7 174 24.2 548 63.2 41.9 32.4
Level of Service (LOS) C B C D A C D D B A
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 23.2 C 27.6 C 51.1 D 17.3 B
Lanes

Volume 210 110 10 160 230 20
Configuration T R LT LR
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 129 200 294
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 1

Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20
Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.220 0.115 0.178 0.261
Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 5.65 4.94 5.41 5.44
Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.388 0.178 0.301 0.444
Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.35 2.64 3.41 3.44

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 129 200 294
Capacity 637 728 665 662
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 1.8 0.6 1.3 2.3
Control Delay (s/veh) 11.9 8.7 10.7 12.7
Level of Service, LOS B A B B
Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 310 110 150 200 40 50 110 90 40 190 80
Signal Information
Green 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 468 739 319 739 448 726 514 745
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.9 194.6 92.9 95.6 25.4 84.4 18.4 120

Intersection SR 303 & N Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternative 1 2…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 910 10 30 630 90 20 30 30 340 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.4 4.0 21.6 2.4 5.6 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.4 31.6 8.4 27.6 8.4 16.0 14.0 21.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.37 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.28 0.22 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 409 667 665 218 570 545 352 249 470 414 491
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 57.4 316.8 303.8 9.5 209.9 194.6 13.2 41.5 107.8 24.5 175.9

Intersection SR 303 & S Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternative 1 2…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1490 50 80 390 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.6 31.4 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 37.4 11.6 49.0 21.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.66 0.56 0.61 0.21 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1405 1053 277 2209 387 485
Level of Service (LOS) C A B B C D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1480 410 100 410 250 0 60
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.1 34.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 40.0 12.1 52.1 17.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.49 0.60 0.66 0.17 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1411 281 2362 327 263
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 333.8 35.9 82.1 190.7 40
Level of Service (LOS) C A B A C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.9 B 10.7 B 0.0 29.1 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 620 1110 290 300 220 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 45.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2101 2281 307 276

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Alternative 1 2027 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 250 40 20 280 70 50 110 30 110 140 200
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 26.5 26.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 495 900 430 559 520 216 580 411 538
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 72.8 110.3 10 99.7 94 39.2 72.2 68.1 208
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B B C B C C
2027
AM PEAK
ALTERNATIVE 2 – PARTIAL BUILD NORTHBOUND LOOP

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build N…
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - Partial Build N Side Loop
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 640 300 150 70 50
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.3 74.9 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.3 94.2 80.9 15.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.77 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 804 1488 1232 1044 160 143
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A D D
2027
AM PEAK
ALTERNATIVE 3 – PARTIAL BUILD NORTH SIDE

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 950 20 410 920 80 80 40 950 80 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 19.8 18.1 4.1 9.8 18.2 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.1 34.2 25.8 49.9 24.2 15.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.44 0.54 0.18 0.18 0.38 0.10 0.10 0.14
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 142 965 528 670 1470 848 306 353 1104 346 172 200
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 17.9 318.3 342.8 327.5 567.3 136.1 86.5 39.1 474.4 44.5 21.8 26
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D C B D C D D D B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.7 D 38.2 D 41.5 D 34.9 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1800 180 140 700 0 390 0 710
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 25.0 17.0 25.0 15.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 31.0 54.0 31.0 54.0 15.0 15.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.25 0.48 0.48 0.25 0.48 0.15 0.40 0.15 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 452 2203 706 421 2450 263 995 269 1577
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.1 410.1 77 254.7 276.8 0 165.6 0 209.5
Level of Service (LOS) C C B D B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 940 1250 1200 230 0 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 71.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.72 0.72 0.16 0.16 0.16
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2850 3437 284 292 263

Royalton
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Alterantive 3 - 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 420 130 10 640 40 220 170 60 30 130 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 1.4 0.4 18.8 3.3 0.7 14.9
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.7 29.2 5.4 24.8 12.0 23.6 7.3 18.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.35 0.48 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.27 0.29 0.25 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 327 884 749 295 530 519 386 502 419 367 385
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 35.5 123.7 48.3 5.5 228.6 214.8 132 101.4 35.1 19.7 187.2
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B C C C B B B C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.5 B 21.9 C 19.8 B 25.4 C

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - Partial Build N Side
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 220 50 120 190 80 70 310 150 30 160 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 26.4 4.2 6.2 0.6 18.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 24.4 12.3 25.0 11.7 43.6 9.7 41.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.21 0.08 0.22 0.38 0.42 0.50 0.32 0.40 0.47
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 225 383 266 391 474 804 804 428 751 757
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 61.2 283.5 69.8 278.2 49.7 243.2 61 24.5 126 12

Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 630 260 150 70 50
Signal Information
Green 74.2 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 283 685 446 76 54
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.06 0.06
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 782 1530 1401 115 102
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 40 45.4 32.8 42.6 29.9
Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 5.3 3.1 3.0 43.6 42.4
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 3.8 A 3.0 A 0.0 43.1 D

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 560 160 70 170 150 610 50 200 90
Signal Information
Green 36.8 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 42.8 42.8 47.2 47.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 765 649 200 735 564 714 895 1629 725
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 247.6 52.7 44.3 52.1 56 359.9 14.9 30.8 27.8
Level of Service (LOS) C B D B B C B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 23.5 C 20.2 C 29.6 C 14.1 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.78 B 0.92 A F 0.79 A

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 970 250 240 560
Signal Information
Green 16.7 61.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Assigned Movement 5 2 6 16
Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.89 0.93 0.68 0.68
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1105 1732 1273 1079
Level of Service (LOS) B A A A
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.1 A 8.4 A 0.0 0.0
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.68 C 1.92 B

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 130 40 10 60 60 30 440 80 50 290 110
Signal Information
Green 3.9 31.0 5.2 1.7 5.2 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 17.9 26.2 7.2 15.5 9.4 45.9 10.7 47.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.27 0.23 0.13 0.11 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 377 419 249 194 419 847 801 461 867 786
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 191.7 150.6 9.3 125 17.4 176.7 168.5 32.6 128.2 119.2
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D B B B B B B

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 250 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 60 70 100
Signal Information
Green 29.4 5.7 18.8 14.1 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.3 43.8 19.6 34.9 11.2 46.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.45 0.66
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 497 788 249 295 252 486 619 202 859 1055
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 283.7 195.8 9.4 229.7 174 24.2 548 63.2 41.9 32.4
Project Description Partial Build N Side
Lanes

Volume 210 110 10 160 230 20
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 129 200 294

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.35 2.64 3.41 3.44

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 129 200 294
Capacity 637 728 665 662
Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2027 AM_Partial Build N Side.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 AM_Partial Build N Side.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 310 110 150 200 40 50 110 90 40 190 80
Signal Information
Green 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 468 739 319 739 448 726 514 745
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.9 194.6 92.9 95.6 25.4 84.4 18.4 120

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 910 10 30 630 90 20 30 30 340 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.6 3.8 21.6 2.4 5.6 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.4 31.4 8.6 27.6 8.4 16.0 14.0 21.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.28 0.22 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 390 662 659 221 570 545 352 249 470 414 491
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 57.5 319.1 306 11.6 221.1 209.3 13.2 41.5 107.8 24.5 175.9

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1360 50 80 450 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.6 28.3 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 34.3 11.6 46.0 24.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.66 0.51 0.57 0.26 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1482 1053 292 2053 465 556
Level of Service (LOS) B A B B C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 18.2 B 13.6 B 22.4 C 0.0

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1350 410 100 470 250 0 60
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.1 34.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 40.0 12.1 52.1 17.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.49 0.60 0.66 0.17 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1744 344 2369 327 263
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 280.8 24 104.5 190.7 40

Demand ( v ), veh/h 900 700 300 160 270 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 43.8 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.63 0.63 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2058 2203 346 310

Demand ( v ), veh/h 160 250 40 20 270 70 50 110 30 120 140 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 27.1 27.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 495 893 427 554 515 216 590 420 547
2027
AM PEAK
ALTERNATIVE 4 – SOUTHBOUND EXIT SOUTHBOUND ENTRANCE

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 980 20 410 930 80 80 40 980 80 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 23.6 23.0 4.4 9.9 19.1 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.4 39.4 29.6 58.6 25.1 15.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.48 0.57 0.17 0.17 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 137 961 568 728 1603 897 293 337 1130 317 157 186
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 20 343.6 390.7 378.4 697.9 178.8 97.5 44.1 532.7 50.2 24.5 30.6
Level of Service (LOS) D D D E D C D D D D D B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1910 130 130 690 0 390 0 730
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 28.0 21.0 27.0 16.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 34.0 61.0 33.0 60.0 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.49 0.15 0.39 0.15 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 461 2163 731 413 2543 255 975 261 1584
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.2 485.9 36 277.5 355.6 0 189.4 0 235.7
Level of Service (LOS) D C A D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 660 1640 1370 260 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 78.1 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.71 0.71 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2786 3462 311 320 288
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 112.2 188.4 311 0 162

Royalton
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 4 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 420 140 70 650 40 210 170 60 30 130 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.4 20.1 3.3 3.7 14.8 0.0
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.4 26.1 9.4 26.1 11.0 22.5 7.3 18.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.41 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.25 0.34 0.25 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 332 795 653 354 568 557 356 471 484 345 380
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.6 136 61.1 33.4 223 209.6 133.8 104 32 19.7 187.2

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - Partial Build SB Only
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 210 50 120 190 80 70 300 150 40 150 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 26.2 4.9 6.2 0.6 18.4
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 23.9 12.3 24.5 11.7 43.4 10.4 42.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.27 0.20 0.08 0.21 0.38 0.42 0.50 0.32 0.41 0.48
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 218 372 266 381 481 799 799 448 761 766
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 61.8 274.8 69.8 281.2 50 236.1 39.6 32.5 115.7 11.9

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 560 30 110 210 80 60 250 90 170 20 50
Signal Information
Green 14.7 8.5 6.6 5.6 3.6 20.9
Case Number 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 20.7 35.3 12.6 27.1 11.6 26.9 15.2 30.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.29 0.23 0.33 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 384 604 593 262 425 386 472 411 290 447
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 225.2 254.9 246.1 113.1 168.9 147.7 45.4 343.7 131.2 55.9
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D D D C D C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.6 C 37.4 D 40.2 D 25.3 C

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 280 500 260 180 100 200
Signal Information
Green 68.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.11
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1402 1188 833 1276 187 294
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D
Project Description Partial Build SB Only
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 20 360 420 20 20 20
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.02 0.12
Level of Service (LOS) A C
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Only.x…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 130 40 60 60 80 30 450 80 50 280 120
Signal Information
Green 4.2 1.3 48.2 5.9 2.0 11.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.9 24.0 11.4 16.5 9.7 53.7 11.0 54.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.26 0.19 0.17 0.11 0.52 0.48 0.48 0.54 0.49 0.49
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 342 338 267 189 537 908 860 498 925 831

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 240 40 10 210 180 30 500 10 60 70 100
Signal Information
Green 29.3 5.7 18.7 14.2 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.2 43.9 19.7 34.8 11.2 46.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.45 0.66
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 498 785 250 297 254 484 617 200 856 1053
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 280.4 195.5 9.4 225.7 189.3 24.3 551.8 63.2 42 32.5
Level of Service (LOS) C B C D B C D D B A
Lanes

Volume 210 100 10 170 230 20

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0

Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 AM_Partial Build SB Onl…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 320 110 150 210 40 50 120 90 40 180 70
Signal Information
Green 24.5 25.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.5 30.5 29.5 29.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 469 753 321 754 456 715 495 734

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 910 10 30 630 100 20 30 30 330 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.5 3.9 21.6 2.4 5.6 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.4 31.5 8.5 27.6 8.4 16.0 14.0 21.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.14 0.28 0.22 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 396 665 663 220 570 543 352 249 470 414 491

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1360 50 80 420 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.6 28.3 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 34.3 11.6 45.9 24.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.66 0.51 0.57 0.26 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1417 1053 286 2050 466 557
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 222.8 3.3 27 124.8 75.4 237.1

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1450 310 70 440 410 0 60
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.3 28.6 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 34.6 11.3 45.9 24.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.51 0.57 0.26 0.26
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1458 254 2050 496 399
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 348.7 23.1 105.5 314.2 34.6
Level of Service (LOS) C A B B D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 750 1110 290 300 220 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 45.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2118 2282 307 275

Project Description SR 303 & W 130th St Alternative 4 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 250 40 20 280 70 50 110 30 110 140 200
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 26.5 26.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 495 900 430 559 520 217 580 411 538
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 72.8 110.3 10 99.7 94 39.2 72.2 68.1 208
2027
AM PEAK
FULL INTERCHANGE

Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchange…
Project Description Full Interchange - 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 910 20 410 890 80 80 40 840 80 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 19.8 17.1 4.0 9.7 14.2 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.0 33.2 25.8 49.0 20.2 15.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.45 0.56 0.15 0.15 0.36 0.10 0.10 0.14
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 145 963 534 709 1517 877 252 291 1044 362 180 208
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 16.9 288.2 312.9 295.3 532.3 134.7 85.5 38.5 383 41.7 20.4 21
Level of Service (LOS) D C D D C B D D D D D B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.9 C 33.1 C 35.8 D 32.5 C

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchange…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1690 140 140 690 0 390 0 690
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 18.1 23.0 18.0 17.9 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 24.1 53.1 24.0 53.0 17.9 17.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.19 0.50 0.50 0.19 0.49 0.19 0.38 0.19 0.38
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 345 2470 725 319 2525 330 938 338 1490
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1 395.9 136.8 345.4 240.2 0 162.9 0 200.5
Level of Service (LOS) C C C E B C C

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchange…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 730 1350 1250 250 0 100
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 66.1 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.70 0.70 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2726 3345 305 314 280
Level of Service (LOS) A A A D C

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2027 AM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2027 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 410 130 70 650 40 220 170 70 30 130 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.4 0.3 20.0 3.3 3.7 14.8
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.7 26.3 9.4 26.0 11.0 22.5 7.3 18.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.42 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.25 0.34 0.25 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 338 781 655 357 563 552 354 470 483 343 379
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 36.5 132.7 56.4 33.7 224.7 211.1 147.7 104.7 37.9 19.8 188

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Project Description 2027 AM Peak - Full Build
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 220 50 120 180 80 70 300 150 40 150 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 25.7 4.9 6.2 0.6 18.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 24.4 12.3 25.0 11.7 42.9 10.4 41.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.21 0.08 0.22 0.38 0.42 0.49 0.32 0.40 0.47
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 233 382 266 390 474 789 791 441 751 757

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 1030 30 110 360 80 20 90 90 140 20 50
Signal Information
Green 12.2 25.1 6.7 6.1 10.0 0.0
Assigned Phase 5 2 1 6 8 7 4
Case Number 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 7.3 2.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.2 49.2 12.7 43.8 16.0 12.1 28.1
Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.2 3.1 3.2
Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.42 0.42 0.11 0.19 0.07 0.25
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 446 891 882 310 747 700 239 299 231 403
Level of Service (LOS) B C C C C C D A D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.9 C 30.6 C 25.3 C 37.1 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.67 B 0.98 A 0.85 A 0.86 A

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 770 430 240 380 90 200
Signal Information
Green 55.0 7.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 61.0 13.0 74.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.61 0.67 0.76 0.11 0.11
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2177 528 2627 187 294
Level of Service (LOS) A A B B D D

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 680 180 360 580 260 90
Signal Information
Green 47.6 7.0 17.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.4 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 66.6 53.6 23.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.58 0.67 0.53 0.53 0.19 0.19
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1310 1249 1884 838 325 289
Level of Service (LOS) B A B C D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.6 B 18.4 B 36.4 D 0.0

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 210 130 40 60 60 80 30 450 80 50 280 110
Signal Information
Green 3.9 31.2 5.2 5.6 0.8 10.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 17.4 22.1 11.1 15.8 9.4 46.1 10.7 47.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.27 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.47 0.47
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 353 336 279 198 427 850 805 460 884 800

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 240 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 60 70 100
Signal Information
Green 29.3 5.7 18.8 14.2 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.3 43.9 19.7 34.8 11.2 46.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.45 0.66
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 498 789 251 297 253 485 617 201 856 1053
Project Description Full Build
Lanes

Volume 210 100 10 170 220 20
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 118 212 282

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.32 2.62 3.36 3.44

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 118 212 282
Capacity 640 732 672 662
Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2027 AM_Full Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 310 110 150 210 40 50 110 90 40 180 70
Signal Information
Green 24.8 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.2 30.2 29.8 29.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 463 743 322 744 463 722 511 743
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 32 192.8 92.5 99.6 25 84.8 18.5 109.6

Intersection SR 303 & N Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchang…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 910 10 30 630 90 20 30 30 330 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.6 3.9 22.6 2.4 4.6 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.4 32.4 8.6 28.6 8.4 16.0 13.0 20.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.14 0.25 0.21 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 409 690 687 231 596 570 352 249 443 387 469
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 55.6 306 293.4 10.9 209.7 198.9 13.2 41.5 137.7 25.1 184.8
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C C C C D C C

Intersection SR 303 & S Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchang…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1170 50 80 430 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.6 28.4 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 34.4 11.6 46.0 24.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.66 0.51 0.57 0.26 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1425 1053 285 2056 463 554

Intersection SR 303 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchang…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1310 260 90 440 350 0 70
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.9 30.3 15.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 36.3 11.9 48.2 21.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.55 0.60 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1515 280 2165 435 350

Intersection SR 303 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Full Interchang…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 850 810 310 300 220 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 45.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2134 2283 307 276

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Full Interchange 2027 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 160 250 40 20 270 70 50 110 30 120 140 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 25.9 25.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 506 909 435 564 525 219 567 405 528
Level of Service (LOS) B A B B B C B C C
2027
PM PEAK
NO BUILD

Jurisdiction Strongsville Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.93
Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 P…
Project Description SR 82 No-Build 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1550 30 890 1440 420 120 140 660 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 35.0 19.5 8.5 12.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 14.5 40.0 41.0 66.5 16.0 18.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.53 0.63 0.09 0.09 0.39 0.10 0.10 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 256 1117 553 1033 1762 995 146 169 1138 368 183 257
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 142.8 731.9 744.8 764.3 916 349.8 243 253.4 309 252.3 159.4 162.7
Level of Service (LOS) E F F F F C F F C E E C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 74.4 E 61.7 E 46.8 D 58.2 E
Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 62.7 E
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.53 B 2.93 C 2.12 B 1.53 B

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 P…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2090 430 120 1090 0 690 0 1660
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 56.0 46.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 62.0 62.0 52.0 52.0 1.0 1.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.41 0.01 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 881 2142 748 673 2101 15 1047 16 2075
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.4 541.2 149.3 209.9 524.9 0 358 0 571.4
Level of Service (LOS) A F B C D C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.9 C 35.9 D 31.0 C 31.2 C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.03 B 1.23 A 1.75 B 3.53 D

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 P…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1460 1320 1520 220 0 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 80.4 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.70 0.70 0.20 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2931 3447 338 349 320
Level of Service (LOS) B A A D D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.90 C 1.37 A 1.34 A

Jurisdiction Strongsville/North Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.88
Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2027 PM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 160 600 150 120 690 40 210 200 90 110 300 160
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.1 2.0 33.9 7.8 0.2 34.1
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.1 41.9 12.1 39.9 16.0 42.3 11.8 38.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.33 0.44 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.43 0.34 0.41 0.38 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 302 762 699 215 583 572 297 626 592 422 591
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 144.2 348.6 120.6 116.4 405 380.7 224.8 199.5 80.7 115.6 480.9
Level of Service (LOS) C D B C D D D C C C D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.5 C 35.8 D 31.4 C 35.7 D

Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.92
Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - No Build
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 290 230 110 100 420 150 100 530 100
Signal Information
Green 6.8 47.4 5.9 6.1 26.3 0.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.4 31.8 23.0 43.5 12.3 52.9 12.3 52.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.27 0.22 0.38 0.32 0.45 0.39 0.45 0.39 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 274 386 352 568 274 711 212 750 714
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 54 424 346.5 356.1 79.9 655 80.6 553.7 84.9
Level of Service (LOS) C E D D C D C D C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.15 A 1.62 B 1.69 B 1.80 B

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 390 440 180 210 0 160
Signal Information
Green 42.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.60 0.60 0.26
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 786 1076 438
Level of Service (LOS) B A D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 17.7 B 8.1 A 0.0 45.6 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.43 A 1.59 B 1.14 A

Intersection N Carpenter Road File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 350 250 150 450 160 0 70
Signal Information
Green 48.3 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1310 1110 1172 290
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.52 B 1.52 B 0.88 A
Time Analyzed PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.95
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 20 400 570 10 10 30
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.02 0.11
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2027 PM_No Build.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 100 50 120 190 130 90 470 80 140 500 280
Signal Information
Green 6.3 20.9 6.8 6.7 2.5 19.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.7 27.2 12.2 24.7 11.8 38.3 12.3 38.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.32 0.24 0.29 0.21 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.29 0.37 0.37
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 297 433 398 379 239 691 656 396 702 617
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D C C C C C C

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 390 180 60 300 20 180 400 250
Signal Information
Green 44.8 7.0 15.6 30.5 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 21.1 57.2 36.0 50.3 12.5 62.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.43 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.42 0.48 0.61
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 332 793 257 472 406 273 697 392 901 979
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 242.4 407.9 35.8 460 148 78.1 317.7 218.2 332.2 152.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C D D B D C D C B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.77 B 1.55 B 1.16 A 1.96 B
Time Analyzed PM Peak
Lanes

Volume 350 230 30 350 230 10

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0

Level of Service, LOS E C C
Approach LOS E C C
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 30.2 D
Drake and Hunt_2027 PM_No Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 260 110 140 370 60 180 210 90 40 240 120
Signal Information
Green 28.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 27.0 27.0 33.0 33.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 277 654 316 667 457 843 508 838
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 44.8 166.4 80.4 203.5 97.8 110 16.6 139.3
Level of Service (LOS) C B C B B B B B

Analyst Eric McCaslin Analysis Date May 9, 2023 Area Type Other
Jurisdiction Brunswick Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.93
Project Description SR 303 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 680 70 150 1080 230 90 140 80 200 130 200
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.4 1.9 23.6 6.1 0.9 12.1
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.2 31.5 12.4 29.6 12.1 18.1 13.0 19.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.40 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.16 0.26 0.17 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 316 621 600 323 582 547 335 289 311 323 443
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 110.8 280.2 263.5 60 336.5 306.8 61.3 206 157.4 99.6 138.2
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B D D C D C C C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.33 A 1.78 B 1.04 A 1.43 A

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1090 180 380 950 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.0 39.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 45.0 14.0 59.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.13 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1384 1039 443 2542 240 394
Level of Service (LOS) C A C A C C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.56 B 1.61 B F

Demand ( v ), veh/h 940 340 200 1040 200 0 290
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 33.0 17.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 39.0 12.9 51.9 23.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.56 0.61 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1158 438 2271 439 362

Demand ( v ), veh/h 560 580 800 350 440 0 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 40.4 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.54 0.54 0.30 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1738 1943 516 460
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A C C

Jurisdiction Brunswick/Hinckley Time Period PM Peak PHF 0.89
Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St No-Build 2027 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 250 50 40 310 120 50 150 30 110 210 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 28.6 28.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 440 868 414 542 490 213 623 401 587
2027
PM PEAK

Project Description Alternative 1 - 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1540 30 880 920 420 120 140 650 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 35.0 22.0 9.0 13.0 11.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 15.0 43.0 41.0 69.0 17.0 19.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.52 0.63 0.09 0.09 0.38 0.11 0.11 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 260 1165 576 990 1758 1000 154 178 1115 383 190 264
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 147 694.3 707.6 878.1 544.8 133.1 234.9 245 320.8 250.1 162.9 156.5
Level of Service (LOS) E E E F C A F F C E E C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 64.5 E 61.3 E 45.7 D 54.6 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.52 B 2.46 B 2.10 B 1.53 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1970 530 110 1040 0 670 0 1180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 14.0 43.0 11.0 34.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 20.0 69.0 17.0 66.0 34.0 34.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.12 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.50 0.28 0.38 0.28 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 211 2175 824 154 2632 497 962 509 1633
Level of Service (LOS) D D C F C D C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.02 B 1.19 A 1.72 B 2.65 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1230 1410 1380 320 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 82.1 25.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.68 0.68 0.22 0.22 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2529 3360 371 382 345

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 1 2027 PM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 1 - 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 610 150 120 680 40 210 210 90 110 300 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.2 2.2 33.6 7.0 1.1 34.2
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.3 41.8 12.2 39.6 16.1 43.3 11.0 38.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.33 0.44 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.43 0.34 0.42 0.37 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 304 769 700 212 576 564 292 645 608 414 588
Level of Service (LOS) C D B C D D D C B C D

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only…
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - Partial Build SB Exit Only
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 300 240 120 110 430 140 100 510 110
Signal Information
Green 6.6 25.2 6.7 5.4 0.7 22.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.3 3.0 1.2 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.9 27.7 17.1 33.9 12.2 43.0 12.1 42.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.22 0.12 0.28 0.30 0.37 0.49 0.34 0.37 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 238 392 409 510 281 707 791 239 710 689
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C D C B C D A
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 40.9 D 38.6 D 28.9 C 30.2 C

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 200 990 190 210 160
Signal Information
Green 5.9 60.8 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 11.9 78.7 66.8 21.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.73 0.61 0.61 0.15 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 426 1360 1138 979 272 242
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A D D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.10 A 2.60 C F

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 190 140 360 220 90 360 730 230
Signal Information
Green 35.6 52.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 41.6 41.6 58.4 58.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 667 565 432 667 336 830 1004 1864 830
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 43.7 63.8 78 203.2 140.8 27 129.6 131.7 76.8
Level of Service (LOS) B B C C C B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.4 B 29.8 C 27.3 C 14.5 B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.19 A 1.38 A F 1.67 B
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 40 610 500 20 20 60
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.04 0.23
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 120 50 120 190 140 90 490 90 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.3 20.4 6.8 6.7 2.5 19.8
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.7 27.8 12.2 25.3 11.8 37.7 12.3 38.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.32 0.25 0.29 0.22 0.32 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 296 447 391 389 236 680 643 386 690 608
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 134 140 88.3 310.4 62.9 223.2 216 119.8 310.1 283.9

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 400 180 70 300 20 190 400 250
Signal Information
Green 31.5 7.0 13.2 26.3 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.7 50.5 31.8 37.0 12.5 49.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.45 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.32 0.32 0.37 0.44 0.57
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 349 829 292 488 420 218 588 347 830 921
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D A D C D C B
Lanes

Volume 370 240 30 360 250 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.89 3.18 3.90 4.66

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283
Capacity 582 657 611 541
Level of Service, LOS C B C C
Approach LOS C C C
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 18.6 C
Drake and Hunt_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 270 110 140 370 60 180 210 90 40 240 120
Signal Information
Green 34.8 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.2 30.2 39.8 39.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 251 644 283 655 480 898 531 893
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 55.1 213.1 99.9 248 108 123.5 18.6 156
Level of Service (LOS) C B C C B B B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.7 C 22.6 C 14.6 B 12.7 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 190 690 70 150 1070 230 90 140 80 200 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.3 1.7 22.9 6.1 1.9 12.1
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.0 30.6 12.3 28.9 12.1 18.1 14.0 20.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.16 0.27 0.19 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 317 598 579 309 565 530 352 288 335 348 458
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C C C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1040 180 380 900 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.0 39.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 45.0 14.0 59.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.13 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1321 1039 431 2542 240 394
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 296.2 145.9 260.9 244 92.9 127.5
Level of Service (LOS) C B D B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 880 350 190 1030 170 0 250
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 35.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 41.0 12.9 53.9 21.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.59 0.64 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1150 464 2370 387 318
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.9 A 12.0 B 0.0 29.4 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 500 550 770 350 450 0 120
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 39.9 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.53 0.31 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1716 1919 527 469
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A C B

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Alternative 1 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 250 40 40 320 120 50 180 30 110 200 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 23.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 29.5 29.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 428 861 411 534 484 211 642 384 598
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 81.5 125 22.1 142.7 130.9 41.1 113.1 72.9 237.8
Level of Service (LOS) B B B C C C B C C
2027
PM PEAK

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build N…
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - Partial Build N Side Loop
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 440 710 220 210 160
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 68.5 6.9 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.4 9.0
Phase Duration, s 12.9 87.5 74.5 22.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.67 0.74 0.62 0.62 0.15 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 375 1374 1165 987 268 238
Level of Service (LOS) C A B A D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.4 B 15.4 B 0.0 47.5 D
2027
PM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1540 30 880 1010 420 120 140 650 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 26.0 16.2 7.8 10.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.8 36.0 32.0 54.2 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.48 0.58 0.10 0.10 0.36 0.10 0.10 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 272 1133 561 882 1612 918 168 194 1047 353 175 257
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 118.3 629.5 648 839.1 393.9 89.1 186.4 197.7 281.2 242.8 142.7 108.9
Level of Service (LOS) D E E F C A E E C E D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1970 530 110 1130 0 670 0 1180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 42.0 3.0 42.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 48.0 51.0 48.0 51.0 1.0 1.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.01 0.43 0.01 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 760 2309 695 707 2343 18 1092 18 1735
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.5 439.4 239.4 176.3 406.5 0 289.5 0 351
Level of Service (LOS) B C B C C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1480 1160 1360 410 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 60.4 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.60 0.60 0.28 0.28 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2505 2923 475 489 444
Level of Service (LOS) C A B D C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.78 C 1.27 A 1.56 B

Royalton
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Alternative 3 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 610 160 120 680 40 200 200 90 110 300 160
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.0 2.6 31.2 7.8 2.2 33.6
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.6 39.8 12.0 37.2 14.0 39.7 11.8 37.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.33 0.42 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.41 0.33 0.41 0.39 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 314 837 669 241 564 553 285 609 583 429 611
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 146.9 344.5 130.3 113 377.4 354.4 217 196.6 78.7 108.4 458.4
Level of Service (LOS) C D C C C C D C C C D

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - Partial Build N Side
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 300 240 120 110 430 140 100 510 110
Signal Information
Green 6.6 25.2 6.7 5.4 0.7 22.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.3 3.0 1.2 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.9 27.7 17.1 33.9 12.2 43.0 12.1 42.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.22 0.12 0.28 0.30 0.37 0.49 0.34 0.37 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 238 392 409 510 281 707 791 239 710 689
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C D C B C D A

Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 400 590 190 210 160
Signal Information
Green 64.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.16 0.16
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 331 1320 1275 277 246
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 71.7 65.9 258 124.5 91.8
Level of Service (LOS) C A B D D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 1.89 B F

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 450 190 140 360 220 340 360 730 230
Signal Information
Green 37.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Phase Duration, s 43.0 43.0 47.0 47.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 763 646 254 769 283 711 898 1635 728
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 256 84.4 91.7 131.4 174.5 132.7 133.4 135.2 78.9
Level of Service (LOS) C C D B D B B B B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.64 B 1.38 A F 1.67 B

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 540 610 500 180
Signal Information
Green 69.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.84 0.93 0.77 0.77
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 812 1732 1448 1227
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 50 th percentile) 87 6.4 59.3 17.5
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 110 50 120 190 140 90 490 80 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.4 19.3 6.8 6.8 2.6 20.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.9 28.7 12.3 26.1 11.9 36.7 12.3 37.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.33 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.27 0.35 0.35
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 300 463 408 404 219 659 626 375 668 589
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 142.1 135 91 322.8 67.4 232.9 225.8 129.1 334.1 305.6

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 400 180 70 300 20 190 400 250
Signal Information
Green 31.5 7.0 13.2 26.3 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.7 50.5 31.8 37.0 12.5 49.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.45 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.32 0.32 0.37 0.44 0.57
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 349 829 292 488 420 218 588 347 830 921
Lanes

Volume 370 240 30 360 250 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.89 3.18 3.90 4.66

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283
Capacity 582 657 611 541
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2027 PM_Partial Build N Side.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 PM_Partial Build N Side.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 270 110 140 370 60 180 210 90 40 240 120
Signal Information
Green 34.8 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.2 30.2 39.8 39.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 251 644 283 655 480 898 531 893
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 55.1 213.1 99.9 248 108 123.5 18.6 156
Level of Service (LOS) C B C C B B B B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 190 690 70 150 1070 230 90 140 80 200 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.2 1.4 20.2 5.9 1.1 11.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 13.6 27.6 12.2 26.2 11.9 17.2 13.0 18.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.16 0.26 0.17 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 313 564 546 306 535 502 347 285 327 325 442
Level of Service (LOS) C C C B D D C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1040 180 380 900 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.9 33.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 39.1 14.9 54.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.62 0.63 0.69 0.14 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1502 979 498 2467 257 443

Demand ( v ), veh/h 880 350 190 1030 170 0 250
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 30.9 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 36.9 12.9 49.8 20.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.57 0.63 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1283 482 2312 390 320

Demand ( v ), veh/h 700 350 780 250 440 0 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 36.7 21.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.52 0.30 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1703 1887 520 463

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Alternative 3 2027 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 260 40 40 320 120 50 170 30 110 200 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 28.8 28.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 434 871 413 540 490 213 628 385 588
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 85 126.7 21.7 140 128.4 40.7 107.5 72.1 231.4
Level of Service (LOS) B B B B C C B C C
2027
PM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1540 30 890 1020 420 120 140 660 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 29.0 17.8 8.2 10.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 14.2 38.0 35.0 58.8 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.50 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.37 0.10 0.10 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 271 1151 570 937 1683 944 160 185 1080 336 167 250
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 124.9 634.7 652.4 1004. 511.9 307.6 206.3 214.7 293.6 269.8 156.1 126.5
9
Level of Service (LOS) D E E F C B E E C F E C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2070 440 110 1040 0 690 0 1290
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 42.0 7.0 34.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 48.0 61.0 40.0 53.0 4.0 4.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.52 0.52 0.32 0.45 0.04 0.36 0.04 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 724 2332 802 545 2330 67 923 68 1783
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1 610.7 496.7 203.8 421 0 368 0 407.7
Level of Service (LOS) C D D D C D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.0 D 27.6 C 36.7 D 28.2 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1350 1410 1380 320 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 70.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.67 0.67 0.22 0.22 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2754 3243 376 387 348

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 610 150 120 680 40 210 210 90 110 300 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.1 2.2 26.4 6.7 2.3 29.9
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 13.2 34.6 11.1 32.4 13.0 36.1 10.7 33.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.41 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.33 0.40 0.37 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 301 803 641 231 528 518 283 607 579 406 594
Level of Service (LOS) C D B C C C D C B C C

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - Partial Build SB Only
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 280 250 120 110 440 150 100 510 100
Signal Information
Green 6.6 18.9 6.5 5.2 5.0 20.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.7 25.8 15.6 30.7 12.1 36.6 12.0 36.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.23 0.11 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.46 0.26 0.34 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 237 396 396 503 213 651 737 308 654 647
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C C A C D B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.4 D 35.6 D 26.6 C 35.8 D

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 330 40 490 640 100 140 200 70 180 70 160
Signal Information
Green 9.4 10.7 34.7 10.1 2.5 22.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.4 40.7 32.1 57.4 16.1 28.6 18.6 31.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.29 0.29 0.52 0.43 0.43 0.27 0.19 0.29 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 357 536 516 649 808 770 271 331 273 345
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 139.1 222.4 213.6 388.2 379.2 369.8 160 350.4 217.8 288.9
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C C D D D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 33.6 C 29.3 C 45.9 D 43.3 D

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 370 280 340 370 880
Signal Information
Green 63.3 44.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.37 0.37
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 979 830 621 898 668 1053
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 115.3 418 260.9 265 360.4 479.1
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 23.6 C 21.4 C 0.0 35.2 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.47 A 1.04 A F
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 40 510 560 20 20 60
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.04 0.24
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 120 50 120 190 140 90 490 90 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.3 20.4 6.8 6.7 2.5 19.8
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.7 27.8 12.2 25.3 11.8 37.7 12.3 38.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.32 0.25 0.29 0.22 0.32 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 296 447 391 389 236 680 643 386 690 608
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 134 140 88.3 310.4 62.9 223.2 216 119.8 310.1 283.9

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 400 180 70 310 20 190 400 250
Signal Information
Green 31.5 7.0 13.2 26.3 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.7 50.5 31.8 37.0 12.5 49.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.45 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.44 0.57
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 350 829 292 489 421 218 587 338 829 921
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 199.1 327.4 27.9 417 165.2 87 309.5 206.7 301.4 136.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D B D C D C B
Lanes

Volume 370 240 30 360 250 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.89 3.18 3.90 4.66

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283
Capacity 582 657 611 541
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 PM_Partial Build SB Onl…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 270 110 140 370 60 180 220 90 40 230 120
Signal Information
Green 27.6 22.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 27.4 27.4 32.6 32.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 286 668 318 681 455 831 490 824

Demand ( v ), veh/h 190 680 70 150 1070 240 90 140 80 190 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.4 1.4 24.2 6.1 0.9 12.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 13.8 31.6 12.4 30.2 12.1 18.0 13.0 18.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.34 0.34 0.41 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.16 0.25 0.17 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 303 623 603 325 596 558 332 286 308 320 432
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 107.6 278.7 262 51.3 414.8 375.4 61.4 213.1 145.1 99.8 132

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1080 180 380 950 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 10.6 36.4 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 42.4 16.6 59.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.49 0.62 0.65 0.71 0.13 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1549 984 541 2542 240 451
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 16.4 B 6.3 A 25.8 C 0.0

Demand ( v ), veh/h 930 340 200 1030 190 0 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 32.5 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 38.5 12.9 51.4 23.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.55 0.61 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1309 416 2245 451 372

Demand ( v ), veh/h 570 550 780 350 450 0 120
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 39.9 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.53 0.31 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1720 1920 527 469

Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 250 40 40 320 120 50 180 30 110 200 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 29.4 29.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 429 863 413 536 486 212 640 385 597
2027
PM PEAK
FULL INTERCHANGE

Project Description Full Interchange - 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1340 30 890 1240 420 220 210 810 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 30.0 14.1 7.9 10.0 13.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.9 34.0 36.0 56.1 19.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.48 0.57 0.12 0.12 0.41 0.10 0.10 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 259 1007 498 970 1599 904 208 240 1191 336 167 245
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 129.4 575.3 592.3 645.9 670.6 100.4 476.1 331.9 351.4 269.8 156.1 57
Level of Service (LOS) E E E F D A F F C F E C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 64.8 E 56.6 E 59.7 E 67.7 E
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.40 A 2.75 C 2.69 C 1.53 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2000 460 130 1140 0 600 0 1410
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 48.0 1.0 43.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 55.0 54.0 50.0 49.0 1.0 1.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.42 0.41 0.01 0.43 0.01 0.48
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 844 2397 702 705 2141 17 1085 17 1950
Level of Service (LOS) B C B C C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1450 1150 1450 350 0 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 68.1 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.24 0.24 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2700 3165 408 420 378
Level of Service (LOS) C A A D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.0 B 10.0 A 39.6 D 0.0

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2027 PM.xus
Project Description SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2027 PM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 160 610 150 120 680 40 200 210 100 110 300 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 1.7 25.9 6.7 1.3 29.4
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 12.6 33.5 10.9 31.9 12.0 34.6 10.7 33.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.31 0.40 0.37 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.32 0.40 0.38 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 299 817 624 237 534 523 275 594 571 406 602
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 126.1 304.4 104.8 98 330.2 310.2 203.6 174.4 73.7 89.9 406.1
Level of Service (LOS) C C B C C C D C B B C

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Project Description 2027 PM Peak - Full Build
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 290 240 120 110 430 140 100 510 110
Signal Information
Green 6.6 20.4 6.5 5.2 3.5 20.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.7 25.8 14.1 29.2 12.1 38.1 12.0 38.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.23 0.32 0.26 0.32 0.36 0.46 0.28 0.36 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 223 396 575 472 213 682 738 336 685 673
Level of Service (LOS) C D C C C C A C D B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.1 D 30.1 C 24.4 C 32.1 C

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 710 40 450 740 110 50 100 70 210 90 160
Signal Information
Green 7.6 33.5 7.1 8.8 12.9 0.0
Case Number 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 7.3 2.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 13.6 53.1 13.1 52.7 18.9 14.8 33.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.20 0.09 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 351 866 850 399 873 833 248 313 304 462
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 99.6 278.9 266.5 257.6 202 165.4 181.3 52.5 128 241.6
Level of Service (LOS) B B B D C C D A D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.9 B 28.1 C 30.4 C 38.2 D

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 590 450 270 580 560 790
Signal Information
Green 35.0 14.1 32.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 41.0 20.1 61.1 38.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.35 0.47 0.55 0.33 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 640 323 1001 611 962
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 615.9 256.9 532 689.4 406.2
Level of Service (LOS) D A D C E D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 30.7 C 35.4 D 0.0 52.6 D

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 440 710 410 170 440 210
Signal Information
Green 10.1 42.9 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 16.1 65.0 48.9 35.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.55 0.59 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 989 1121 816 691 525 467
Level of Service (LOS) B B C B D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.0 B 22.6 C 34.6 C 0.0
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.55 C 1.53 B F

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 110 50 120 190 140 90 490 80 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.3 20.5 6.8 6.7 2.4 19.8
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.5 27.7 12.2 25.3 11.8 37.8 12.3 38.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.32 0.25 0.29 0.22 0.32 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 294 443 397 389 237 682 649 389 692 610

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 400 180 70 300 20 190 410 250
Signal Information
Green 31.5 7.0 13.2 26.3 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.7 50.5 31.8 37.0 12.5 49.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.45 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.44 0.57
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 350 829 292 489 421 211 587 346 829 921
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 198.8 327.4 27.9 417 160.3 88.2 299.3 207.6 310 136.7
Lanes

Volume 370 240 30 360 250 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.89 3.18 3.90 4.66

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 402 261 424 283
Capacity 582 657 611 541
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2027 PM_Full Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2027 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 270 110 140 370 60 180 200 90 40 220 120
Signal Information
Green 27.7 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 27.3 27.3 32.7 32.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 283 665 315 677 466 832 509 826

Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 680 70 150 1070 220 90 140 80 190 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.4 1.9 23.5 6.1 0.9 12.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.3 31.4 12.4 29.5 12.1 18.2 13.0 19.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.40 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.16 0.26 0.18 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 320 619 598 322 580 546 336 290 312 325 445
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C C C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1080 180 380 930 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 9.9 41.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 43.1 15.9 59.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.49 0.63 0.65 0.71 0.13 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1813 999 545 2542 240 436
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 249 131 98.8 91.6 92.5 121.9
Level of Service (LOS) B B B A C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 930 340 200 1010 190 0 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 32.4 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 38.4 12.9 51.4 23.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.55 0.60 0.24 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1559 447 2242 452 373

Demand ( v ), veh/h 570 550 780 350 430 0 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 21.8 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 14.9 10.4 14.2
Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00
Max Out Probability 0.01 0.00 0.00

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.44 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1414 1570 545 483
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 66.1 114.1 195 43.6
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 4.7 A 7.1 A 16.1 B 0.0

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Full Interchange 2027 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 250 40 40 310 120 50 160 30 110 200 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 28.7 28.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 439 871 416 540 489 212 627 393 587
2047
AM PEAK
NO BUILD

Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 A…
Project Description SR 82 No-Build 2047 AM
Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1050 20 440 1010 80 90 40 1070 80 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 27.2 25.2 4.6 9.9 23.1 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.6 41.8 33.2 64.4 29.1 15.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.23 0.49 0.57 0.19 0.19 0.42 0.08 0.08 0.12
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 132 857 559 770 1632 899 324 373 1219 292 145 174
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 22 408.1 505 396.4 864.1 209.2 118.8 47.4 619.7 55.7 27.2 34.3
Level of Service (LOS) E D D D D C D D D D D B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.14 A 1.84 B 2.62 C 0.72 A

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 A…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2030 170 150 730 0 440 0 800
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 30.0 31.0 27.0 14.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 36.0 73.0 33.0 70.0 14.0 14.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.25 0.56 0.56 0.22 0.53 0.12 0.34 0.12 0.37
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 452 2188 824 379 2787 205 859 209 1464
Level of Service (LOS) D C A E C C C

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 A…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 600 1870 1570 130 0 240
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 86.9 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2841 3597 302 311 285

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2047 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 460 150 70 690 40 230 180 60 30 140 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.4 0.3 19.9 3.3 3.7 16.2
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.7 26.2 9.4 25.9 11.0 23.9 7.3 20.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.30 0.41 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.27 0.35 0.26 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 311 709 641 301 550 539 344 499 503 350 409
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 38.1 173.1 69.2 35.4 256.4 241.3 166 110.8 32 19.7 208.4

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 230 50 130 200 80 80 320 170 30 150 20
Signal Information
Green 6.4 34.4 4.2 6.2 2.1 19.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 24.8 13.7 26.9 11.9 51.8 9.7 49.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.25 0.19 0.28 0.21 0.43 0.46 0.37 0.44 0.50
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 221 352 255 386 549 828 338 825 809
Level of Service (LOS) C D C D B C C B B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.4 D 36.1 D 23.4 C 18.8 B

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 270 380 270 160 70 0 50
Signal Information
Green 43.9 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.73 0.73 0.10
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 976 1263 172
Level of Service (LOS) B A C

Intersection N Carpenter Road File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 320 140 100 270 170 0 100
Signal Information
Green 36.3 13.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1151 975 1030 382
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 10 410 360 10 10 10
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.01 0.05
Approach LOS B
Boston and Benbow_2047 AM_No Build.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 230 140 40 70 60 80 30 470 90 50 280 110
Signal Information
Green 4.2 38.1 5.5 6.2 1.9 11.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 19.0 24.1 11.7 16.7 9.7 53.3 11.0 54.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.27 0.19 0.17 0.11 0.44 0.48 0.48 0.42 0.49 0.49
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 348 340 266 194 452 900 850 462 917 830
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 238.2 193.4 71.5 168.3 18.6 202 193.6 35.2 132.5 123

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 370 240 30 10 210 190 30 510 10 70 70 100
Signal Information
Green 47.6 6.5 24.8 19.1 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 30.3 54.9 24.6 53.1 12.0 65.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.41 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.50 0.70
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 476 760 233 300 256 569 752 255 945 1124
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 419.9 255.9 13 284.7 186.1 29 572.6 98 53.1 39.9
Level of Service (LOS) D C D D C C D D B A
Lanes

Volume 210 110 10 160 240 20

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0

Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2047 AM_No Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 AM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 330 120 160 210 40 50 120 100 40 200 80
Signal Information
Green 23.6 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 31.4 31.4 28.6 28.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 488 778 323 780 410 687 465 707
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 35.2 202.7 100.6 94.6 27.2 100 19.8 133.2

Demand ( v ), veh/h 130 1010 10 30 710 110 20 30 30 380 40 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 3.0 3.8 30.5 2.9 9.8 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.8 40.3 9.0 36.5 8.9 16.0 24.8 31.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.11 0.34 0.29 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 359 695 693 183 626 596 284 194 577 533 566
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 84.4 441.7 423.6 14 270.4 258.4 18.8 58.6 300.6 30 235
Level of Service (LOS) B C C C C C C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1640 50 80 470 130 410
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.2 42.3 23.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 48.3 12.2 60.5 29.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.73 0.56 0.61 0.26 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1442 1163 208 2176 472 542
Level of Service (LOS) F A C B C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 43.1 D 15.9 B 29.4 C 0.0

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1640 410 110 500 360 0 50
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.6 45.0 20.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 51.0 12.6 63.6 26.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.50 0.60 0.64 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1495 220 2322 436 351
Level of Service (LOS) C A C B D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.5 C 14.6 B 0.0 35.2 D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 740 1260 350 300 260 0 250
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 60.1 17.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.67 0.67 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2194 2366 340 308

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St No-Build 2047 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 250 40 20 290 80 50 130 30 130 160 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 28.3 28.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.49 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 469 876 419 544 504 214 616 417 571
2047
AM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1060 20 410 920 80 80 40 960 90 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 24.0 20.7 4.3 9.9 16.1 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.3 37.0 30.0 56.7 22.1 15.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.23 0.48 0.58 0.15 0.15 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 140 856 553 776 1620 912 258 298 1112 332 165 193
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 18.9 371.3 458.3 360.9 653.4 166.5 95.3 43 501.3 53.4 23.1 26.3
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D C B D D D D D B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1920 190 160 700 0 390 0 710
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 21.0 33.0 20.0 13.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 27.0 66.0 26.0 65.0 13.0 13.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.20 0.57 0.57 0.19 0.56 0.12 0.31 0.12 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 362 2073 842 320 2905 217 783 222 1279
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1.1 550.2 120.3 507.4 303.2 0 205.3 0 248
Level of Service (LOS) D C B F B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 650 1660 1460 260 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 73.9 19.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.70 0.70 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2753 3436 313 322 290

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 60 400 150 80 710 50 230 190 60 40 110 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.0 0.7 20.0 4.0 3.0 14.4
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.0 26.0 9.7 26.7 11.0 21.4 8.0 18.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.31 0.42 0.39 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.24 0.32 0.25 0.19
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 287 627 654 349 587 573 353 442 468 325 364

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 240 70 150 210 80 70 320 150 40 210 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 23.1 4.9 6.2 0.8 21.4
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 26.9 12.4 27.7 11.7 40.2 10.4 39.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.31 0.24 0.08 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.46 0.29 0.37 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 325 431 271 468 485 383 733 745 386 696 710
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C A C C A C C B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.9 C 29.9 C 19.1 B 22.1 C

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 380 300 150 70 50
Signal Information
Green 14.4 48.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 20.4 74.4 54.0 15.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.62 0.76 0.53 0.53 0.11 0.11
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 287 1421 982 859 187 172
Level of Service (LOS) F A C B D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 37.4 D 21.6 C 0.0 37.8 D

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 270 190 90 200 150 100 70 260 120
Signal Information
Green 40.1 6.4 6.0 3.1 10.4 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 46.1 12.4 58.5 15.1 19.5 12.0 16.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.55 0.49 0.58 0.22 0.22 0.18 0.12 0.12
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 834 853 569 1092 303 345 357 404 180
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 140 41.3 58.4 87.7 136.1 50.8 64.5 137.9 130.5
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A C A C D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.9 A 11.7 B 21.5 C 38.3 D
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Configuration LT TR L R
Volume (veh/h) 30 410 290 30 30 30
Percent Grade (%) 0
Right Turn Channelized No


Capacity, c (veh/h) 1206 308 701
v/c Ratio 0.03 0.11 0.05
Level of Service (LOS) A C B
Approach LOS B
Boston and Benbow_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit O…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 140 60 60 70 80 30 450 80 60 320 160
Signal Information
Green 3.9 29.8 5.6 5.6 1.2 10.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 17.8 23.1 11.1 16.4 9.4 44.7 11.1 46.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.20 0.18 0.12 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.45 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 362 352 267 210 368 820 777 454 850 755

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 260 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 10 210 170
Signal Information
Green 3.4 24.3 1.7 18.8 14.3 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.3 44.1 19.8 8.9 38.7 7.2 37.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.37 0.27 0.35 0.56
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 500 793 249 299 256 354 699 173 665 892
Level of Service (LOS) C B C D A C D D C B
Lanes

Volume 210 120 10 160 230 20
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 141 200 294

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.35 2.65 3.42 3.46

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 141 200 294
Capacity 637 728 664 660
Approach LOS B B B
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ AWSC Version 7.9.5 Generated: 5/23/2023 3:31:00 PM
Drake and Hunt_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 320 110 150 210 40 50 110 90 60 210 100
Signal Information
Green 6.2 38.9 5.9 6.4 3.4 34.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.3 4.0 1.2 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.4 39.2 14.9 42.6 10.9 54.7 11.2 55.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.34 0.28 0.37 0.31 0.36 0.41 0.39 0.42 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 342 505 232 556 501 723 438 787 672
Level of Service (LOS) C D C C C C C C B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 1080 10 30 740 100 20 20 30 370 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.6 4.0 27.4 2.7 3.3 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.6 37.4 8.6 33.4 8.7 16.0 18.0 25.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.16 0.12 0.30 0.24 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 391 717 714 183 633 607 314 214 507 449 506
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 64.8 427.9 410.5 11.3 236.1 226.4 16 41.5 79.5 28.1 200.2

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1630 50 90 450 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.2 39.8 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 45.8 12.2 58.0 22.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.50 0.70 0.60 0.65 0.20 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1518 1110 234 2337 361 455
Level of Service (LOS) F A B B C D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.5 C 13.6 B 42.6 D 0.0

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1550 480 130 470 260 0 70
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.7 41.5 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 47.5 12.7 60.2 19.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.63 0.68 0.17 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1451 247 2446 332 267
Level of Service (LOS) F A B B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 620 1190 340 300 260 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 52.7 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2141 2325 328 295
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 70.4 43 230 177.7

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 270 40 20 290 70 50 110 30 130 140 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 27.2 27.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.49 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 484 891 419 551 515 216 593 420 550
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 79.9 122.9 10.2 104.6 98.7 39.7 72 81.9 214.1
2047
AM PEAK

Project Description 2047 AM Peak - Partial Build N Side Loop
Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 240 970 650 260 30 30 0 30
Signal Information
Green 94.6 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.05
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1529 2393 985 1579 84
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A E
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 3.4 A 7.2 A 0.0 57.5 E
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.71 C 2.17 B 0.60 A
2047
AM PEAK
ALTERNATIVE 3 - PARTIAL BUILD NORTH SIDE

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1060 20 410 940 80 80 40 960 90 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 21.9 22.7 4.4 9.9 21.1 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.4 39.1 27.9 56.6 27.1 15.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.46 0.55 0.19 0.19 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 137 1136 563 676 1543 869 323 372 1137 318 158 186
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 20 380 375.8 339.3 680.7 117.7 95.1 43 504 56.6 24.5 18.6
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D D A D D D D D B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1920 190 160 720 0 390 0 710
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 41.0 9.0 38.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 47.0 62.0 44.0 59.0 4.0 4.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.37 0.51 0.51 0.35 0.48 0.04 0.38 0.04 0.41
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 674 2499 752 581 2474 64 953 65 1619
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 1 502.9 167.8 303.5 308.4 0 192.8 0 225.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 960 1350 1220 250 0 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 78.7 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2877 3464 301 310 279

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 100 390 150 10 680 50 250 160 80 40 150 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 1.4 0.9 19.1 4.2 2.5 17.3
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 10.3 30.0 5.4 25.1 14.7 27.8 8.2 21.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.34 0.49 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.39 0.31 0.33 0.27 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 285 732 766 257 496 484 408 569 468 415 413
Level of Service (LOS) B C B B C C B B B B C

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 240 70 150 210 80 70 320 150 40 210 20
Signal Information
Green 6.2 23.1 4.9 6.2 0.8 21.4
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 26.9 12.4 27.7 11.7 40.2 10.4 39.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.31 0.24 0.08 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.46 0.29 0.37 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 325 431 271 468 485 383 733 745 386 696 710
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.9 C 29.9 C 19.1 B 22.1 C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 640 300 150 70 50
Signal Information
Green 7.4 74.8 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.4 94.2 80.8 15.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.77 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 791 1488 1231 1044 160 143
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A D D

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 560 190 90 170 150 610 70 260 120
Signal Information
Green 31.0 6.6 6.3 2.1 40.0 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 37.0 12.6 49.7 14.4 48.0 12.3 46.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.42 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1005 447 269 1358 530 690 681 1293 575
Level of Service (LOS) D A D C B D B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 970 270 260 650
Signal Information
Green 31.4 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.95 0.62 0.62
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 983 1771 1165 987
Level of Service (LOS) C A A B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.7 B 16.0 B 0.0 0.0

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 230 140 50 10 80 60 30 440 80 70 360 130
Signal Information
Green 3.9 29.6 6.0 1.7 5.7 10.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.4 26.9 7.2 15.7 9.4 44.5 11.5 46.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.24 0.13 0.11 0.39 0.43 0.43 0.37 0.46 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 374 431 248 199 364 816 773 463 853 776

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 AM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 260 30 10 210 170 30 500 10 10 210 170
Signal Information
Green 3.4 24.3 1.7 18.8 14.3 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.3 44.1 19.8 8.9 38.7 7.2 37.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.37 0.27 0.35 0.56
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 500 793 249 299 256 354 699 173 665 892
Lanes

Volume 210 120 10 160 230 20
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 141 200 294

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.35 2.65 3.42 3.46

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 247 141 200 294
Capacity 637 728 664 660
Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2047 AM_Partial Build N Side.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 AM_Partial Build N Side.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 320 110 150 210 40 50 110 90 60 210 100
Signal Information
Green 6.2 38.9 5.9 6.4 3.4 34.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.3 4.0 1.2 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.4 39.2 14.9 42.6 10.9 54.7 11.2 55.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.34 0.28 0.37 0.31 0.36 0.41 0.39 0.42 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 342 505 232 556 501 723 438 787 672
Level of Service (LOS) C D C C C C C C B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 1080 10 30 740 100 20 20 30 370 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 3.1 3.6 32.3 2.9 8.1 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.7 41.9 9.1 38.3 8.9 16.0 23.0 30.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.11 0.32 0.27 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 354 728 726 183 663 635 284 191 549 497 534
Level of Service (LOS) B C C C C C C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1450 50 90 520 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.3 42.5 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 48.5 12.3 60.8 29.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.73 0.56 0.61 0.26 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1568 1160 222 2191 464 539
Level of Service (LOS) C A C B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1370 480 130 540 260 0 70
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.8 49.9 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 55.9 12.8 68.7 21.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.55 0.65 0.70 0.17 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1707 277 2534 327 264
Level of Service (LOS) C A B B D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 920 710 370 160 300 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 58.9 19.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.21 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2183 2319 364 328
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 181 57.7 288 194.5
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 270 40 10 290 70 50 90 30 140 150 260
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 31.2 31.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.47 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 450 841 395 521 486 206 660 483 612
Level of Service (LOS) B B B C C C B B C
2047
AM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 1000 20 410 940 80 80 40 1050 90 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 26.1 25.3 4.6 9.9 24.1 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.6 41.9 32.1 63.4 30.1 15.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.22 0.48 0.56 0.20 0.20 0.42 0.08 0.08 0.12
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 132 966 560 738 1603 887 337 389 1216 292 145 174
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 22 383.5 429.1 379 821.3 100.4 103.6 46.8 595.8 62.9 27.2 19.8
Level of Service (LOS) E D D D D A D D D D D B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.11 A 1.76 B 2.56 C 0.74 A

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2000 140 160 700 0 390 0 730
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 42.0 12.0 40.0 8.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 48.0 66.0 46.0 64.0 8.0 8.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.35 0.50 0.50 0.33 0.48 0.07 0.40 0.07 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 633 2273 734 561 2524 117 1001 120 1656
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.8 554.1 34 328.5 378 0 203.7 0 248.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C A C C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 670 1720 1460 260 0 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 86.5 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2844 3557 308 317 286

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 60 400 150 80 710 50 230 190 60 40 150 140
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.2 0.6 20.2 4.1 2.9 16.5
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 9.2 26.2 9.8 26.9 11.0 23.4 8.1 20.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.30 0.40 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.26 0.34 0.28 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 281 691 634 367 572 558 348 482 497 352 421

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 230 70 140 190 80 80 300 150 60 190 20
Signal Information
Green 6.4 22.6 5.9 6.2 0.7 20.8
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.7 26.3 12.4 27.0 11.9 39.9 11.4 39.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.30 0.23 0.08 0.24 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.46 0.29 0.38 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 333 418 269 454 490 398 727 740 418 705 717
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.1 D 29.6 C 19.1 B 21.6 C

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 640 30 130 250 90 70 250 90 220 20 50
Signal Information
Green 7.3 5.7 29.0 6.2 4.8 22.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 19.1 40.8 13.3 35.0 12.2 28.9 17.0 33.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.23 0.35 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 500 645 635 316 526 479 473 406 292 456
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 195.1 307.5 297 107.1 219.4 194.3 60.9 399.1 235.7 62.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C C C D D C D D C

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 280 640 330 190 140 260
Signal Information
Green 74.6 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.13 0.13
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1384 1173 769 1260 225 355
Level of Service (LOS) A C B A D D
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 30 390 490 30 30 30
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.03 0.21
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Only.x…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 220 140 60 60 70 80 30 450 80 60 320 160
Signal Information
Green 3.9 29.8 5.6 5.6 1.2 10.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 17.8 23.1 11.1 16.4 9.4 44.7 11.1 46.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.20 0.18 0.12 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.45 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 362 352 267 210 368 820 777 454 850 755

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 240 50 10 210 200 30 510 10 10 210 200
Signal Information
Green 3.4 23.3 1.7 18.5 15.6 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 24.0 45.1 21.1 8.9 37.7 7.2 36.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.44 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.32 0.36 0.26 0.34 0.54
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 515 810 265 329 279 339 678 152 644 876
Lanes

Volume 210 110 10 170 250 20

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0

Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 AM_Partial Build SB Onl…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 340 110 150 220 40 50 140 90 50 180 90
Signal Information
Green 24.1 25.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.9 30.9 29.1 29.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 470 768 315 768 427 707 467 714
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.4 205.3 93.4 101 26.4 103.4 24.8 125.6

Demand ( v ), veh/h 110 1060 10 30 730 120 20 20 30 340 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 3.6 3.3 51.9 3.5 12.8 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.8 61.1 9.6 57.9 9.5 16.0 28.3 34.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.51 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.12 0.09 0.30 0.25 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 432 875 872 222 834 793 231 149 506 465 484
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 76.1 470 450.8 14.9 205.8 196.8 25.7 66.1 346.2 42.4 286
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B B B D D D C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 25.6 C 17.2 B 48.7 D 35.1 D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1440 50 90 500 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.7 61.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 67.0 12.7 79.7 35.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.79 0.61 0.64 0.25 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1707 1249 236 2304 460 514
Level of Service (LOS) B A C A C D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1490 350 80 520 470 0 70
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.5 57.9 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 63.9 12.5 76.4 38.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.50 0.58 0.61 0.28 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1625 192 2244 545 441
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 585 52.3 80.7 504.3 70.7
Level of Service (LOS) C A C A D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.4 C 8.8 A 0.0 41.6 D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 770 1190 340 300 260 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 82.1 20.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.71 0.71 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2390 2540 311 283

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 270 40 20 290 70 50 110 30 130 140 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 27.2 27.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.49 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 484 891 419 551 515 216 593 420 550
2047
AM PEAK
FULL INTERCHANGE

Demand ( v ), veh/h 30 940 20 470 900 50 90 40 840 90 20 30
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 19.0 16.0 4.0 9.8 16.2 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 10.0 32.0 25.0 47.0 22.2 15.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.43 0.53 0.17 0.17 0.37 0.10 0.10 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 145 925 511 679 1447 845 287 330 1078 365 181 209
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 16.9 306 333.7 350.4 383.6 11.3 94.1 37.5 369.3 47 20.4 23
Level of Service (LOS) D D D F C A C C C D D B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1710 160 160 690 0 390 0 690
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 37.0 1.0 36.0 3.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 43.0 50.0 42.0 49.0 3.0 3.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.38 0.45 0.03 0.41 0.03 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 705 2028 678 638 2308 55 1020 57 1656
Level of Service (LOS) A C A C B C B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 730 1350 1270 250 0 100
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 66.2 16.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.70 0.70 0.18 0.18 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2727 3348 305 314 280
Level of Service (LOS) A A A D C

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2047 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 130 380 150 80 710 40 240 150 90 40 150 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 5.8 0.8 19.8 4.1 2.9 16.9
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 10.6 26.6 9.8 25.8 11.0 23.8 8.1 20.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.30 0.40 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.34 0.26 0.35 0.28 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 318 640 637 334 536 526 338 486 498 381 423
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 66.4 140 72.2 42.3 262.6 247.3 196 94.4 51.2 26.5 218.4

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 240 70 160 180 80 70 310 150 60 190 20
Signal Information
Green 5.9 0.3 33.6 6.4 0.6 21.2
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.9 26.7 12.4 27.3 11.7 39.4 11.4 39.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.31 0.24 0.08 0.24 0.31 0.44 0.38 0.45 0.44 0.37 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 351 428 271 460 495 537 716 731 402 699 716
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C B C B B C B
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 38.0 D 34.9 C 20.9 C 19.7 B

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 1080 30 140 410 80 20 90 90 180 30 50
Signal Information
Green 12.3 14.0 6.8 6.9 10.0 0.0
Case Number 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 7.3 2.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 18.3 38.3 12.8 32.8 16.0 12.9 28.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.12 0.21 0.09 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 406 749 742 274 597 563 269 322 296 477
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 177.9 422 409.6 142.6 198.7 160.1 100.2 35.8 83.9 54.4
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D C C C A D C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.72 B 1.05 A 0.85 A 0.95 A

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 770 540 310 400 130 260
Signal Information
Green 10.9 31.1 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 37.1 16.9 54.0 26.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.55 0.60 0.25 0.25
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1383 492 2086 421 662
Level of Service (LOS) A A B B C C

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 690 210 420 650 290 90
Signal Information
Green 37.8 7.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.4 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 56.8 43.8 23.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.63 0.47 0.47 0.22 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1166 1178 1681 748 362 322
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 271.2 95 107.5 558.8 261.6 73.2
Level of Service (LOS) C A B D C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.1 C 30.6 C 31.4 C 0.0

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 210 150 60 60 80 80 30 450 80 70 320 130
Signal Information
Green 3.3 14.6 5.4 5.0 4.2 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.7 19.7 10.5 15.5 8.8 28.9 10.9 31.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.20 0.21 0.14 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.26 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 397 366 301 249 285 630 597 396 682 615
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 133.5 152.2 37.4 130.3 16.3 175.6 168 43 137.8 127.2
Level of Service (LOS) C C C C B C C C B B

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 250 50 10 210 170 30 500 10 70 90 100
Signal Information
Green 3.9 34.0 6.4 22.7 17.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 28.2 50.7 22.5 7.9 47.4 11.9 51.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.41 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.36 0.38 0.35 0.42 0.62
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 476 752 228 291 249 492 721 246 793 997
Level of Service (LOS) C C D D A C D D C A
Lanes

Volume 220 110 10 170 220 20
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 259 129 212 282

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 3.33 2.63 3.39 3.49

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 259 129 212 282
Capacity 639 731 668 656
Approach LOS B B B
Drake and Hunt_2047 AM_Full Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 AM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 70 320 110 160 220 40 50 110 90 50 190 90
Signal Information
Green 24.1 25.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 30.9 30.9 29.1 29.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 470 766 330 768 419 700 494 715
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 31.4 192.6 98.4 101 26.8 87.7 24 131.3

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 1070 10 30 720 90 20 20 30 340 40 270
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 2.7 3.9 25.5 2.5 0.5 10.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 12.5 35.4 8.7 31.5 8.5 16.0 15.0 22.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.17 0.13 0.28 0.22 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 387 715 712 195 628 604 332 229 469 407 478
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 59.2 399.1 382.9 11 258 242.2 14.6 37.9 106.2 26.9 195.7

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1340 50 90 480 130 400
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.0 31.7 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 37.7 12.0 49.7 25.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.68 0.53 0.58 0.26 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1525 1081 257 2096 464 555

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1440 300 90 490 370 0 80
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.0 33.3 17.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 39.3 12.0 51.3 23.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.55 0.60 0.24 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1532 247 2179 454 366
Level of Service (LOS) F A B B C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 930 880 320 300 260 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 48.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.19 0.19
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2139 2277 331 298
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 139.1 38.3 215.8 164

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Full Interchange 2047 AM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 280 40 20 280 70 50 110 30 120 140 200
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 20.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 39.0 26.0 26.6 26.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 498 908 425 569 530 215 577 411 536
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 73.5 125 11.2 111.3 105.8 39.8 73.4 76.1 210
2047
PM PEAK
NO BUILD

Intersection SR 82 & Howe Rd File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 P…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1620 30 950 1460 420 130 140 730 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 37.0 19.2 8.8 10.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 14.8 40.0 43.0 68.2 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.54 0.63 0.09 0.09 0.41 0.09 0.09 0.16
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 267 1117 553 1092 1809 990 146 169 1189 307 152 236
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 138.2 820.6 827.8 769 786.6 89.1 283.5 253.4 336.9 317.9 186.8 146.6
Level of Service (LOS) E F F F F A F F C F E C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 86.4 F 51.0 D 48.3 D 89.7 F

Intersection SR 82 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 P…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2210 450 140 1140 0 760 0 1670
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 54.0 1.0 47.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 60.0 61.0 53.0 54.0 1.0 1.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.41 0.42 0.01 0.42 0.01 0.48
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 850 2120 735 688 2200 15 1076 16 2003
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 0.2 487.2 42.6 250.3 546.6 0 400 0 611.9
Level of Service (LOS) A F A C D C D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 40.4 D 36.2 D 32.6 C 36.0 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.11 B 1.27 A 1.88 B 3.55 D

Intersection SR 82 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 82 Coordinated Intersections No-Build 2047 P…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1510 1460 1590 240 0 290
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 78.9 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.69 0.21 0.21 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2873 3397 360 371 342
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 397.4 258.6 285 0 335.9

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St No-Build 2047 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 640 170 120 740 40 220 210 90 110 320 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.9 3.1 40.8 8.5 1.4 41.2
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 16.0 49.9 12.9 46.8 17.9 50.6 12.5 45.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.35 0.46 0.40 0.32 0.32 0.44 0.35 0.43 0.38 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 286 798 724 196 599 589 276 659 612 417 614
Level of Service (LOS) C D C C D D E C C C D

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 230 130 330 250 110 120 430 170 100 550 100
Signal Information
Green 6.7 0.2 39.6 5.6 4.4 26.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.1 31.5 21.0 41.3 12.4 45.3 12.2 45.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.29 0.24 0.40 0.33 0.42 0.36 0.42 0.36 0.41
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 283 414 341 586 239 649 176 684 663
Level of Service (LOS) C E F C C E C D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 63.6 E 60.1 E 61.7 E 40.5 D

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 420 470 190 220 0 160
Signal Information
Green 41.3 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.59 0.59 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 685 1057 456
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 416 224 297.5
Level of Service (LOS) C B D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.1 C 11.2 B 0.0 35.6 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.48 A 1.66 B 1.16 A

Intersection N Carpenter Road File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 370 260 170 480 170 0 80
Signal Information
Green 47.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.4 0.0 14.4 12.0
Phase Duration, s 52.4 0.0 52.4 17.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1286 1090 1042 311
Level of Service (LOS) A A B C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.8 A 10.7 B 30.0 C 0.0
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 30 420 610 10 10 40
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.03 0.14
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2047 PM_No Build.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 190 110 60 140 200 140 100 490 90 150 520 290
Signal Information
Green 6.5 19.4 6.9 7.5 2.0 20.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.0 27.8 13.0 25.8 12.0 36.8 12.4 37.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.33 0.25 0.31 0.23 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.27 0.35 0.35
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 302 443 406 399 220 661 626 378 669 588
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 144.8 140 101.8 318.2 71.9 227.1 219.9 132.5 337 307.7

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 390 200 60 300 20 200 400 250
Signal Information
Green 44.8 7.0 15.6 30.6 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 6.4 1.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 21.1 57.2 36.1 50.3 12.5 62.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.40 0.43 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.41 0.48 0.61
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 332 794 257 473 407 273 696 392 900 979
Level of Service (LOS) C C D D B D C D C B
Lanes

Volume 350 250 30 360 250 10

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0

Level of Service, LOS F C C
Approach LOS F C C
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 37.3 E
Drake and Hunt_2047 PM_No Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 PM_No Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 90 270 120 150 390 70 190 220 100 40 260 130
Signal Information
Green 26.9 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 28.1 28.1 31.9 31.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 277 687 325 701 408 807 466 804
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 50.7 170.8 85.8 213.8 116.1 126 17.9 164
Level of Service (LOS) C B C B C B B B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 210 770 70 160 1220 260 90 140 80 220 130 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.5 2.2 26.6 6.2 1.8 12.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.8 34.9 12.5 32.6 12.2 18.6 14.0 20.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.23 0.16 0.26 0.18 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 294 659 639 304 616 578 332 281 311 335 452
Level of Service (LOS) C C C B D D C D D C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1220 180 380 1060 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 8.8 43.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 49.0 14.8 63.8 16.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.54 0.67 0.67 0.72 0.13 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1413 1058 415 2597 231 390
Level of Service (LOS) C A D A C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1010 400 220 1140 260 0 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 36.2 18.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 42.2 13.0 55.2 24.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.56 0.61 0.24 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1213 368 2305 451 373

Demand ( v ), veh/h 560 710 850 350 510 0 160
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 40.5 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.51 0.51 0.34 0.34
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1639 1839 588 526
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A C B
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.59 B 1.53 B 1.65 B

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St No-Build 2047 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 270 40 40 330 140 50 170 30 130 230 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 31.3 31.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.46 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 401 840 395 520 468 207 673 412 632
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 108.1 145.8 23.2 162.5 147.8 42.5 107.4 87 257.2
2047
PM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1570 40 900 1090 430 130 140 650 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 34.0 23.9 9.1 12.0 11.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 15.1 45.0 40.0 69.9 17.0 18.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.28 0.53 0.63 0.09 0.09 0.37 0.10 0.10 0.18
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 265 1228 606 962 1781 997 154 178 1091 353 175 254
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 145 679.9 690.5 849 476.6 107.7 271.1 245 325.4 273.8 171.2 156
Level of Service (LOS) E D E F C A F F C F E C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2170 540 110 1130 0 680 0 1290
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 49.0 4.0 43.0 6.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 55.0 65.0 49.0 59.0 6.0 6.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.49 0.49 0.36 0.44 0.05 0.41 0.05 0.46
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 739 2140 768 603 2340 88 1048 90 1884
Level of Service (LOS) B F A D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1340 1510 1440 370 0 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 78.4 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.25 0.25 0.25
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2562 3218 425 437 396
Level of Service (LOS) B A B D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.5 A 10.9 B 44.6 D 0.0

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 660 170 100 670 50 260 240 110 130 280 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.8 0.3 38.3 9.9 2.8 39.1
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 16.0 48.5 11.8 44.3 20.7 49.9 13.9 43.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.34 0.48 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.45 0.35 0.42 0.38 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 294 810 754 176 571 557 323 659 600 415 586
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 194.2 464.4 150.4 115.7 455.6 426.8 333.3 259 116.1 159 562.9
Level of Service (LOS) C D B C D D E C C C D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.43 A 1.26 A 1.63 B 1.61 B

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 360 270 140 140 510 140 100 510 170
Signal Information
Green 8.3 21.6 6.6 5.4 2.7 22.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.9 27.8 19.1 36.0 13.8 40.9 12.1 39.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.22 0.14 0.31 0.37 0.32 0.35 0.49 0.26 0.34 0.39
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 346 393 478 580 598 223 667 789 253 641 631
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 42.5 331 203.9 236.6 70.6 120.2 492 60.6 111.8 510.5 137
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C B C D A D D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.3 D 32.6 C 32.9 C 39.3 D

Intersection Boston and Howe File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 230 710 220 210 160
Signal Information
Green 60.1 6.6 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.4 9.0
Phase Duration, s 12.6 78.7 66.1 21.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.73 0.60 0.60 0.15 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 352 1360 1124 968 272 246
Level of Service (LOS) C A C A D D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.15 A 2.16 B F

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 220 140 360 280 90 500 780 340
Signal Information
Green 23.5 6.9 19.0 7.3 15.2 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 29.5 12.9 42.4 25.0 21.2 36.4 32.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.24 0.43 0.28 0.36 0.19 0.22 0.32 0.27 0.27
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 440 674 315 681 339 351 577 946 421
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 235 94.4 160.2 316.4 337 67.9 555.1 412 389.6
Level of Service (LOS) D A D C D A D D D
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Configuration LT TR L R
Volume (veh/h) 50 740 500 30 30 70
Percent Grade (%) 0
Right Turn Channelized No


Capacity, c (veh/h) 1023 137 544
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.23 0.14
Level of Service (LOS) A E B
Approach LOS C
Boston and Benbow_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 180 50 120 210 170 90 560 120 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.3 17.2 6.8 6.7 2.9 22.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.1 31.0 12.2 28.1 11.8 34.5 12.3 35.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.28 0.33 0.25 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.33 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 305 518 392 441 207 612 574 321 622 548

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 440 190 100 310 20 210 400 250
Signal Information
Green 6.4 17.6 7.0 12.8 28.6 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.3 52.4 34.1 11.9 35.1 12.5 35.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.47 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.30 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 343 865 315 530 457 189 551 314 568 692
Level of Service (LOS) C B C D A C D D D C
Lanes

Volume 380 250 30 370 290 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 326

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 4.16 3.45 4.15 4.79

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 326
Capacity 557 626 585 531
Level of Service, LOS D B C C
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Exit…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 90 290 110 150 390 60 180 230 100 40 250 120
Signal Information
Green 9.4 26.2 4.8 6.5 1.9 26.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.5 31.3 13.3 33.2 14.4 45.6 9.8 41.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.33 0.26 0.35 0.28 0.38 0.41 0.29 0.36 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 205 473 264 515 426 731 414 683 683
Level of Service (LOS) C D C D C C C C B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 810 70 160 1180 300 90 140 80 260 130 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.7 2.7 36.5 6.5 3.5 15.1
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 15.4 45.2 12.7 42.5 12.5 21.1 16.0 24.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.48 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.16 0.26 0.20 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 308 754 733 303 711 661 328 283 309 364 460
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 127 359.2 338.1 67.7 417.2 388.3 83.6 237.3 168.5 127.3 160.4
Level of Service (LOS) C C C B C C C D E C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1140 190 380 1000 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 9.7 57.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 63.3 15.7 79.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.60 0.71 0.72 0.77 0.11 0.21
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1478 1124 458 2763 190 344
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.0 B 7.8 A 41.2 D 0.0

Demand ( v ), veh/h 910 420 210 1120 190 0 260
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.2 50.7 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 56.7 13.2 69.8 25.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.63 0.67 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1301 434 2546 387 320
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A C D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 550 550 780 360 550 0 120
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 48.5 34.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.51 0.51 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1664 1863 621 555
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A C C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.44 A 1.48 A 1.65 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 270 40 50 320 130 50 170 30 110 200 250
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 33.8 33.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.45 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 390 811 381 502 453 201 713 437 658
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 63.8 159.7 31.2 164 149.8 44.4 106.7 71.9 278.7
Level of Service (LOS) B B C C C C B C C
2047
PM PEAK

Project Description 2047 PM Peak - Partial Build N Side Loop
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 690 560 250 500 30 30 0 70
Signal Information
Green 7.0 75.4 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 12.0
Phase Duration, s 81.4 13.0 94.4 15.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.69 0.69 0.77 0.80 0.09
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1233 1907 453 1499 145
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.82 C 1.89 B 0.67 A
2047
PM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1570 40 900 1110 430 130 140 650 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 29.0 17.8 8.2 10.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 14.2 38.0 35.0 58.8 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.50 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.37 0.10 0.10 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 271 1151 568 937 1683 944 160 185 1080 336 167 250
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 124.7 679.1 694.3 995.3 454 136.9 237.8 214.7 288.7 269.8 156.1 115.4
Level of Service (LOS) D F F F C A F E C F E C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2080 540 110 1150 0 680 0 1290
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 43.0 1.0 45.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 4.0 4.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.04 0.47 0.04 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 741 2199 649 721 2292 67 1189 68 1822
Level of Service (LOS) A C B C C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1600 1160 1380 410 0 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 64.1 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2563 2969 473 487 442
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 618 253.2 423.6 0 205.1
Level of Service (LOS) C A B D C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.88 C 1.29 A 1.56 B

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 190 670 180 110 670 30 220 220 100 120 320 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.6 1.4 33.6 8.5 3.5 34.5
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 41.0 11.6 39.6 16.0 42.0 12.5 38.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.33 0.44 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.44 0.34 0.41 0.39 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 297 873 691 213 585 576 303 628 588 422 609

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 360 270 140 140 510 140 100 510 170
Signal Information
Green 8.3 21.6 6.6 5.4 2.7 22.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.9 27.8 19.1 36.0 13.8 40.9 12.1 39.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.22 0.14 0.31 0.37 0.32 0.35 0.49 0.26 0.34 0.39
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 346 393 478 580 598 223 667 789 253 641 631
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 42.5 331 203.9 236.6 70.6 120.2 492 60.6 111.8 510.5 137
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C B C D A D D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 440 710 220 210 160
Signal Information
Green 68.5 6.9 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.4 9.0
Phase Duration, s 12.9 87.5 74.5 22.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.67 0.74 0.62 0.62 0.15 0.15
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 375 1374 1165 987 268 238
Level of Service (LOS) C A B A D D

Intersection SB Ramps/N Carpenter File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Partial Build N…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 450 220 140 360 280 350 500 780 340
Signal Information
Green 20.9 6.9 16.9 12.5 24.8 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 1.1 3.0 2.0 3.0
Phase Duration, s 26.9 12.9 39.8 22.9 30.8 39.4 47.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.19 0.34 0.23 0.31 0.38 0.29 0.32 0.38 0.38
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 668 538 222 1092 442 451 578 1353 602
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 236 119.9 180.6 168.1 255.5 228.6 571.8 350 314.8
Level of Service (LOS) D A D C C C D C C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 30.1 C 33.3 C 27.5 C 35.7 D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 560 740 500 250
Signal Information
Green 91.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.87 0.95 0.83 0.83
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1614 1754 1560 1322
Level of Service (LOS) A A A A

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 130 50 120 210 170 110 570 100 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.7 24.2 6.9 7.0 2.8 24.9
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.3 33.2 12.5 30.4 12.2 41.9 12.4 42.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.35 0.28 0.32 0.25 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.29 0.37 0.37
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 279 502 410 438 233 691 655 345 695 612
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 145.7 160.7 95.9 375.7 87 281.7 272 142 339.4 310.4

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 PM_Partial Build N Side.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 440 190 100 310 20 210 400 250
Signal Information
Green 6.4 17.6 7.0 12.8 28.6 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.3 52.4 34.1 11.9 35.1 12.5 35.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.43 0.47 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.30 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 343 865 315 530 457 189 551 314 568 692
Level of Service (LOS) C B C D A C D D D C
Lanes

Volume 380 250 30 370 290 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 326

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 4.16 3.45 4.15 4.79

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 326
Capacity 557 626 585 531
Level of Service, LOS D B C C
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2047 PM_Partial Build N Side.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 PM_Partial Build N Side.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 90 290 110 150 390 60 180 230 100 40 250 120
Signal Information
Green 9.4 26.2 4.8 6.5 1.9 26.3
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.5 31.3 13.3 33.2 14.4 45.6 9.8 41.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.33 0.26 0.35 0.28 0.38 0.41 0.29 0.36 0.42
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 205 473 264 515 426 731 414 683 683
Level of Service (LOS) C D C D C C C C B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 810 70 160 1180 300 90 140 80 260 130 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.6 2.5 33.3 6.4 2.6 14.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 15.1 41.8 12.6 39.3 12.4 20.6 15.0 23.2

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.40 0.40 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.23 0.16 0.26 0.19 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 308 727 706 300 685 637 329 288 307 354 456
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 121.9 352.4 331.9 66 406.9 373.4 77.8 218.3 178.2 120.5 150.9
Level of Service (LOS) C C C B C C C D E C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1140 190 380 1000 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 10.4 50.4 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 56.4 16.4 72.7 17.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.56 0.68 0.70 0.74 0.13 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1669 1089 482 2665 226 395
Level of Service (LOS) B A B A D C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 910 420 210 1120 190 0 260
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 46.7 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 52.7 13.0 65.7 24.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.62 0.66 0.20 0.20
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1427 458 2504 390 322
Level of Service (LOS) B A A A C D

Demand ( v ), veh/h 730 370 810 250 520 0 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 46.9 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.52 0.35 0.35
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1711 1897 592 529
Level of Service (LOS) A A B A C C
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.44 A 1.41 A 1.62 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 280 40 50 340 120 50 230 20 100 210 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 25.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 31.5 31.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.46 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 404 837 391 518 472 208 685 374 630
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 93.5 152.8 29.5 158.2 146 42.6 138.2 68 256.5
2047
PM PEAK

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1600 40 910 1110 430 120 140 700 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 32.0 19.5 8.5 10.0 10.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 14.5 40.0 38.0 63.5 16.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.52 0.61 0.09 0.09 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 268 1168 576 987 1749 968 153 176 1111 321 159 243
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 131.5 718.8 732.3 904.7 436.4 88.6 224 233.3 323 293.7 170.9 138.9
Level of Service (LOS) E F F F B A F E C F E C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2260 450 130 1110 0 730 0 1340
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 48.0 43.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 54.0 60.0 49.0 55.0 1.0 1.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.45 0.01 0.40 0.01 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 790 2219 752 658 2338 16 1026 16 1824
Level of Service (LOS) A F A C C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1480 1510 1440 370 0 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 70.6 27.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.64 0.64 0.25 0.25 0.25
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2673 3142 428 441 398
Level of Service (LOS) B A B D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 9.4 A 10.7 B 40.8 D 0.0

Royalton
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 660 170 100 670 50 260 240 210 130 280 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.3 0.2 31.3 9.2 0.8 35.7
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.5 41.5 11.3 37.3 18.0 44.6 13.2 39.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.32 0.45 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.45 0.35 0.42 0.39 0.31
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 293 864 707 202 526 513 323 650 597 420 600
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 170 396.8 140.1 104.5 407.9 381.9 307 234.7 211.5 136.7 497.3
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 34.9 C 36.9 D 36.1 D 35.5 D

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 60 210 120 300 340 140 130 540 160 120 510 110
Signal Information
Green 7.7 23.2 6.8 5.8 0.4 23.1
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 11.3 28.6 17.2 34.5 13.2 41.9 12.3 41.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.29 0.23 0.12 0.29 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.48 0.28 0.35 0.41
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 281 406 411 551 576 212 686 774 247 674 665
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 50.5 336.8 174.6 303.2 70.6 109 525 74.6 134.2 484.2 80.6
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C B C D B D D B

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 150 390 40 500 740 110 190 260 70 190 80 160
Signal Information
Green 10.8 14.8 24.8 12.7 0.2 26.7
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 16.8 30.8 37.6 51.6 18.9 32.8 18.7 32.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.30 0.21 0.21 0.49 0.38 0.38 0.33 0.22 0.33 0.22
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 321 384 371 617 717 684 333 396 258 368
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C C C C D D D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 46.2 D 28.1 C 45.9 D 44.6 D

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Partial Build S…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 460 300 350 480 1020
Signal Information
Green 56.5 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.43 0.43
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 874 740 568 801 776 1213
Level of Service (LOS) B A C C C D
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 9.3 A 27.1 C 0.0 33.3 C
Lanes

Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Volume (veh/h) 50 770 580 30 30 70
Percent Grade (%) 0


v/c Ratio 0.06 0.43
Level of Service (LOS) A D
Approach LOS D
Boston and Benbow_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xtw

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Only.…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 180 50 120 210 170 90 560 120 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.3 17.2 6.8 6.7 2.9 22.6
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 15.1 31.0 12.2 28.1 11.8 34.5 12.3 35.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.28 0.33 0.25 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.33 0.33
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 305 518 392 441 207 612 574 321 622 548

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 400 60 30 420 180 110 340 20 210 410 250
Signal Information
Green 6.9 18.6 7.0 13.1 26.9 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 18.6 51.0 32.4 12.4 36.5 12.5 36.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.46 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.31 0.24 0.31 0.44
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 341 839 298 500 430 197 578 310 586 712
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D A C D D D C
Lanes

Volume 380 250 30 360 270 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 424 304

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 4.02 3.30 4.03 4.72

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 424 304
Capacity 570 643 597 536
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Only.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 PM_Partial Build SB Onl…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 290 110 140 380 70 180 290 90 40 230 140
Signal Information
Green 27.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 28.0 28.0 32.0 32.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 283 688 316 697 425 820 422 801
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 44.1 177.3 80.1 207.4 104.7 156 19 152.4
Level of Service (LOS) C B C B C B B B

Intersection SR 303 & N Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternataive 4…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 740 70 150 1190 320 90 140 80 210 130 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.4 2.0 26.9 6.2 1.8 12.7
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.4 34.9 12.4 32.9 12.2 18.7 14.0 20.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.24 0.16 0.26 0.18 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 286 659 638 311 622 576 334 283 313 337 447
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 139.5 310.4 292.1 62.8 399.3 352.6 67.1 225 181.9 106.3 132

Intersection SR 303 & S Carpenter Rd File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternataive 4…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 1150 180 380 1060 130 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 9.4 42.1 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 48.1 15.4 63.6 16.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.66 0.67 0.72 0.13 0.25
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1563 1045 469 2588 235 408
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 298 138 197.8 287.3 109.4 136
Level of Service (LOS) C A C B C C

Intersection SR 303 & I71 SB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternataive 4…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 950 390 220 1140 190 0 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 36.3 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 42.3 13.0 55.3 24.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.57 0.62 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1266 440 2311 448 370

Intersection SR 303 & I71 NB Ramps File Name SR 303 Coordinated Intersections Alternataive 4…
Demand ( v ), veh/h 590 550 810 360 550 0 120
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 38.6 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.48 0.48 0.37 0.37
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1565 1750 628 560
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.48 A 1.50 B 1.65 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 120 270 40 50 320 130 50 270 30 110 200 250
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 34.1 34.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.45 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 387 807 379 500 451 204 725 356 663
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 64.6 161.5 31.4 165 150.8 44.3 172.6 79.9 278.8
Level of Service (LOS) B B C C C C B C C
2047
PM PEAK
FULL INTERCHANGE

Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 1420 40 930 1420 430 240 210 810 310 110 170
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 30.0 15.2 7.8 10.0 12.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 13.8 35.0 36.0 57.2 18.0 16.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.49 0.58 0.11 0.11 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.17
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 254 1043 514 970 1635 921 192 222 1164 336 167 243
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 131.5 635.1 649.3 781.9 977 120.7 630.2 373.4 358.5 269.8 156.1 158.4
Level of Service (LOS) E F F F F B F F C F E C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 70.4 E 80.1 F 81.6 F 68.7 E
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 2.95 C 2.72 C 1.53 B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 2000 540 170 1140 0 670 0 1640
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 41.0 1.0 35.0 10.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 7.0 7.0
Phase Duration, s 47.0 54.0 41.0 48.0 10.0 10.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.40 0.10 0.43 0.10 0.49
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 707 2305 710 561 2089 167 1091 171 2014
Level of Service (LOS) B C B D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1520 1150 1490 350 0 150
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 68.1 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.65 0.65 0.24 0.24 0.24
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 2713 3170 408 420 378
Level of Service (LOS) B A B D C

Royalton
Intersection SR 82 & W 130th St File Name SR 82 & W 130th St Full Interchange 2047 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 170 660 170 100 680 50 220 240 110 130 270 180
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.9 33.0 8.9 2.1 32.9 0.0
Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0
Phase Duration, s 11.0 39.0 10.9 38.9 15.0 39.0 12.9 36.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.32 0.43 0.41 0.32 0.32 0.42 0.32 0.39 0.40 0.30
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 265 881 684 230 609 594 307 604 565 409 602
Level of Service (LOS) D C B C C C D C C C D

Intersection Boston and Pearl File Name Boston Pearl_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 50 210 110 320 300 150 140 490 140 120 510 150
Signal Information
Green 8.2 22.7 6.8 5.4 1.4 22.4
Case Number 1.1 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 10.9 27.9 17.8 34.8 13.7 41.9 12.3 40.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.28 0.22 0.12 0.29 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.49 0.28 0.35 0.40
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 308 395 433 557 582 221 687 785 283 666 651
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 42.5 327.5 185.8 266.1 76.3 118 450.8 62.5 133.8 490.3 115.4
Level of Service (LOS) C D D C B C D B D D C

Intersection Boston and Howe/Carpe… File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 140 780 40 450 900 160 50 110 70 210 90 160
Signal Information
Green 8.9 18.0 21.2 8.7 13.2 0.0
Case Number 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 7.3 2.0 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.9 38.8 27.2 51.2 19.2 14.7 33.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.34 0.09 0.28
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 228 605 594 507 845 800 254 537 300 465
Level of Service (LOS) C D D D C C D A D C

Intersection SB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 590 510 270 700 710 880
Signal Information
Green 22.3 15.0 44.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.4 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 28.3 21.0 49.2 50.8

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.22 0.35 0.43 0.45 0.45
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 784 361 1521 807 1271
Level of Service (LOS) D A D C D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 25.4 C 32.7 C 0.0 35.2 D
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.47 A 1.36 A F

Intersection NB Ramps File Name Boston Central Corridor_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 480 820 410 250 560 240
Signal Information
Green 16.7 28.9 36.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 2.0 4.0 7.3 9.0
Phase Duration, s 22.7 57.7 34.9 42.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.52 0.29 0.29 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 579 966 537 455 642 571
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 226.9 721 447.1 262.7 617 207.5
Level of Service (LOS) D D D D D C
Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 43.3 D 43.0 D 43.7 D 0.0
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 2.82 C 1.67 B F

Intersection Boston and W 130th File Name Boston W 130th_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 180 170 50 120 230 180 100 580 100 140 500 270
Signal Information
Green 6.5 16.5 6.8 6.7 2.0 24.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0
Phase Duration, s 14.2 31.5 12.2 29.5 12.0 34.0 12.3 34.3

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.36 0.29 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 285 528 408 471 210 601 570 316 608 536

Intersection Howe and Drake File Name Howe Drake_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 260 410 60 30 420 190 100 310 20 200 450 250
Signal Information
Green 6.6 26.4 7.0 14.1 29.9 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 5.3 1.2 4.0 1.3 3.0
Phase Duration, s 19.6 55.0 35.4 10.6 42.5 12.5 44.4

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.42 0.45 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.32 0.34 0.29 0.35 0.48
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 333 829 278 504 434 190 627 350 667 776
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 220 371.6 31.4 486.7 192 93.2 323.7 235.8 448.8 194.7
Level of Service (LOS) C C C D B C C D D B
Lanes

Volume 380 250 30 370 270 10
Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 304

Move-Up Time, m (s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0
Service Time, ts (s) 4.04 3.33 4.04 4.75

Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 413 272 435 304
Capacity 568 640 596 533
Approach LOS C C C
Drake and Hunt_2047 PM_Full Build.xaw

Intersection Carpenter and Grafton File Name Carpenter Grafton_2047 PM_Full Build.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 80 310 110 140 390 70 180 200 100 40 220 130
Signal Information
Green 39.1 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 35.9 35.9 44.1 44.1

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 248 694 274 702 463 877 506 872
Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C B B B

Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 770 70 150 1200 230 100 140 80 200 130 200
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 6.4 2.2 26.4 6.4 1.6 13.0
Case Number 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.0 1.1 3.0
Phase Duration, s 14.6 34.6 12.4 32.4 12.4 19.0 14.0 20.6

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.41 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.16 0.26 0.18 0.29
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 309 653 634 299 611 576 340 290 318 339 453
Level of Service (LOS) B C C B C D C D C C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 1180 190 380 980 120 190
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 10.3 41.3 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 9.0
Phase Duration, s 47.3 16.3 63.5 16.5

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.52 0.65 0.67 0.72 0.13 0.26
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1859 1028 509 2587 236 425
Level of Service (LOS) C B B A C C

Demand ( v ), veh/h 980 390 220 1060 200 0 300
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 36.3 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 7.3 1.0 4.0 11.0
Phase Duration, s 42.3 13.0 55.3 24.7

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.45 0.57 0.62 0.23 0.23
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1627 466 2300 449 371

Demand ( v ), veh/h 630 550 800 350 480 0 130
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 42.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.53 0.53 0.32 0.32
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1705 1902 555 495
Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.51 B 1.49 A 1.55 B

Intersection SR 303 & W 130th St File Name SR 303 & W130th St Full Interchange 2047 PM.xus
Demand ( v ), veh/h 200 270 40 50 330 130 50 200 30 110 200 210
Signal Information
1 2 3 4
Green 7.0 19.4 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Case Number 1.0 4.0 6.3 6.0 6.0
Phase Duration, s 13.0 38.4 25.4 30.9 30.9

Green Ratio ( g/C ) 0.41 0.47 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
Capacity ( c ), veh/h 408 844 397 523 473 208 669 382 620
Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/ln ( 95 th percentile) 106.8 144 29.2 156.9 143.1 42.2 125.5 74.3 250.9
APPENDIX M
HCS ANALYSIS – FREEWAY FACILITY
Note: Traffic volumes may not change for every facility for every alternative. Therefore,
facility results may reference other alternatives. Refer to Table 6 through Table 13 for which
alternatives are referenced and therefore do not have reports in their respective sections in
this Appendix.
2027 FREEWAY NORTHBOUND
AM PEAK
HCS Freeway Facilities Report
Project Information
Analyst Logan Sasse Date 5/9/23
Agency Euthenics Inc. Analysis Year 2027
Jurisdiction Strongsville/Brunswick Time Analyzed AM peak
Facility Name Units U.S. Customary
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 NB - No Build
Facility Global Input

Jam Density, pc/mi/ln 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/ln 45.0
Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 12
Total Analysis Periods 1 Analysis Period Duration, min 15
Facility Length, mi 7.62
Facility Segment Data

No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes
1 Basic Basic I-71 NB S of SR 303 1700 3
2 Diverge Diverge I-71 NB diverge to SR 303 1500 3
3 Basic Basic I-71 NB between exit to SR 303 and SR 1700 3

303 EB entrance
4 Merge Merge SR 303 EB merge to I-71 NB 1500 3
5 Merge Merge SR 303 WB merge to I-71 NB 1500 3
6 Basic Basic I-71 NB between SR 303 and SR 82 21380 3

82 EB entrance
10 Overlap Basic 110 3
12 Basic Basic I-71 NB N of SR 82 4750 3
Segment 1: Basic
AP PHF fHV Flow Rate Capacity d/c Speed Density LOS
(pc/h) (pc/h) Ratio (mi/h) (pc/mi/ln)
1 1.00 1.000 2620 7104 0.37 66.8 13.1 B
Segment 2: Diverge
F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Infl. F R Infl.
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2620 468 7050 2200 0.37 0.21 65.5 62.7 13.3 16.0 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2180 7104 0.31 66.7 10.9 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3297 1117 7050 2000 0.47 0.56 61.8 60.1 17.8 19.0 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3549 319 7050 2000 0.50 0.16 62.1 60.4 19.0 17.5 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3530 7104 0.50 66.8 17.6 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3530 362 7050 2000 0.50 0.18 60.7 56.1 19.4 20.4 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3190 7104 0.45 66.4 15.9 B
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5030 1840 7050 4000 0.71 0.46 60.0 58.3 27.9 24.9 C
Segment 10: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 4920 7200 0.68 67.0 24.2 C
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5771 851 7050 2000 0.82 0.43 58.9 57.0 32.7 28.2 D
Segment 12: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 5720 7104 0.81 62.4 30.6 D
Facility Analysis Results

AP VMT VMT-Demand VHD Total Delay Cost Speed Density Density TT LOS
veh-mi/AP veh-mi/AP veh-h/AP $/AP mi/h pc/mi/ln veh/mi/ln min
1 7182 6903 4.23 105.79 64.6 19.5 19.5 7.10 C
Facility Overall Results

Space Mean Speed, mi/h 64.6 Average Density, veh/mi/ln 19.5
Average Travel Time, min 7.10 Average Density, pc/mi/ln 19.5
Total VMT, veh-mi 7182 Total VHD, veh-h 4.23
Vehicle Value of Time (VOT), $/h 25.00 Total Delay Cost, $ 105.79
Copyright © 2023 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Freeways Version 2023 Generated: 05/09/2023 11:34:17
71NB Freeway Facility No-Build 2027 AM.xuf
Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 NB - Alternative 2



303 EB entrance
6 Basic Basic I-71 NB between Boston Road and SR 10580 3

303
7 Merge Merge Boston Road merge to I-71 NB 1500 3
8 Basic Basic I-71 NB between SR 82 and Boston 9300 3

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2350 7104 0.33 66.8 11.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2350 511 7050 2200 0.33 0.23 65.3 62.6 12.0 15.1 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1870 7104 0.26 66.7 9.3 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2615 745 7050 2000 0.37 0.37 62.0 60.2 14.1 14.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2740 170 7050 2000 0.39 0.09 62.4 60.5 14.6 13.3 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2730 7104 0.38 66.8 13.6 B
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4391 1661 7200 2000 0.61 0.83 65.3 63.0 22.4 25.5 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 4260 7200 0.59 69.4 20.5 C
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4260 404 7050 2000 0.60 0.20 60.4 55.8 23.5 24.0 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3880 7104 0.55 66.4 19.4 C
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5210 1330 7050 4000 0.74 0.33 59.9 58.4 29.0 24.2 C
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5130 7200 0.71 67.0 25.5 C
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5758 628 7050 2000 0.82 0.31 58.9 57.2 32.6 27.6 C
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 5720 7104 0.81 62.4 30.6 D

1 7116 6804 4.92 123.10 65.1 19.1 19.1 7.00 C

71NB Freeway Facility Alternate 2 2027 AM.xuf
Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2350 7104 0.33 66.8 11.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2350 511 7050 2200 0.33 0.23 65.3 62.6 12.0 14.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1870 7104 0.26 66.7 9.3 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2615 745 7050 2000 0.37 0.37 62.0 60.2 14.1 14.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2740 170 7050 2000 0.39 0.09 62.4 60.5 14.6 13.3 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2730 7104 0.38 66.8 13.6 B
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4391 1661 7200 2000 0.61 0.83 65.3 63.0 22.4 25.5 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 4260 7200 0.59 69.4 20.5 C
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4260 404 7050 2000 0.60 0.20 60.3 55.8 23.5 24.3 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3880 7104 0.55 66.4 19.4 C
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5210 1330 7050 4000 0.74 0.33 59.9 58.4 29.0 24.2 C
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5130 7200 0.71 67.0 25.5 C
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5758 628 7050 2000 0.82 0.31 58.9 57.2 32.6 27.6 C
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 5720 7104 0.81 62.4 30.6 D

1 7007 6696 4.90 122.39 65.0 18.9 18.9 7.00 C

Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 NB - Full Interchange



303 EB entrance

303
7 Diverge Diverge I-71 NB diverge to Boston Road 1500 3
8 Basic Basic I-71 NB between Boston Road ramps 2380 3

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2610 7104 0.37 66.8 13.0 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2610 457 7050 2200 0.37 0.21 65.1 62.3 13.4 16.0 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2180 7104 0.31 66.7 10.9 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3042 862 7050 2000 0.43 0.43 61.3 59.6 16.5 17.2 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3309 319 7050 2000 0.47 0.16 61.5 59.8 17.9 16.4 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3290 7104 0.46 66.8 16.4 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.917 3290 406 7200 2000 0.46 0.20 65.3 59.9 16.8 16.9 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2940 7200 0.41 69.8 14.0 B
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4308 1368 7200 2000 0.60 0.68 65.9 63.6 21.8 24.3 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4200 7200 0.58 69.5 20.1 C
Segment 11: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4200 372 7050 2000 0.60 0.19 60.2 55.6 23.3 23.7 C
Segment 12: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3850 7104 0.54 66.4 19.2 C
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5286 1436 7050 4000 0.75 0.36 59.4 57.8 29.7 24.8 C
Segment 14: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5200 7200 0.72 66.7 26.0 C
Segment 15: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5913 713 7050 2000 0.84 0.36 58.4 56.6 33.8 28.5 D
Segment 16: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 5870 7104 0.83 61.6 31.8 D

1 7438 7115 5.82 145.46 64.8 20.1 20.1 7.10 C

71NB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2027 AM.xuf
PM PEAK
Project Information
Jurisdiction Strongsville/Brunswick Time Analyzed PM peak



303 EB entrance

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2240 7104 0.32 66.8 11.2 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2240 606 7050 2200 0.32 0.28 64.9 62.4 11.5 14.3 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1670 7104 0.24 66.7 8.3 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2287 617 7050 2000 0.32 0.31 62.6 60.7 12.2 13.0 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2622 372 7050 2000 0.37 0.19 62.7 60.8 13.9 13.3 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2600 7104 0.37 66.8 13.0 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2600 521 7050 2000 0.37 0.26 59.8 55.8 14.5 16.0 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2110 7104 0.30 66.3 10.5 A
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3514 1404 7050 4000 0.50 0.35 62.3 60.9 18.8 16.9 B
Segment 10: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3430 7200 0.48 67.7 16.3 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3994 564 7050 2000 0.57 0.28 61.9 60.4 21.5 19.0 B
Segment 12: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3960 7104 0.56 66.8 19.8 C

1 5225 5025 1.70 42.60 65.7 13.9 13.9 7.00 B

71NB Freeway Facility No-Build 2027 PM.xuf
Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2170 7104 0.31 66.8 10.8 A
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2170 606 7050 2200 0.31 0.28 64.9 62.4 11.1 13.9 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1600 7104 0.23 66.7 8.0 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 1972 372 7050 2000 0.28 0.19 62.5 60.5 10.5 10.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2216 266 7050 2000 0.31 0.13 62.6 60.6 11.8 11.1 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2200 7104 0.31 66.8 11.0 A
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2966 766 7200 2000 0.41 0.38 67.8 65.5 14.6 16.4 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2920 7200 0.41 70.0 13.9 B
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2920 660 7050 2000 0.41 0.33 59.2 55.2 16.4 17.9 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2300 7104 0.32 66.3 11.5 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3534 1234 7050 4000 0.50 0.31 62.0 60.6 19.0 16.5 B
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3460 7200 0.48 67.6 16.5 B
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4024 564 7050 2000 0.57 0.28 61.5 60.0 21.8 19.2 B
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3990 7104 0.56 66.8 19.9 C

1 5173 4955 1.98 49.58 66.4 13.6 13.6 6.90 B

71NB Freeway Facility Alternate 2 2027 PM.xuf
Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2170 7104 0.31 66.8 10.8 A
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2170 606 7050 2200 0.31 0.28 64.9 62.4 11.1 13.9 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1600 7104 0.23 66.7 8.0 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 1972 372 7050 2000 0.28 0.19 62.5 60.5 10.5 10.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2216 266 7050 2000 0.31 0.13 62.6 60.6 11.8 11.1 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2200 7104 0.31 66.8 11.0 A
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.952 3005 805 7200 2000 0.42 0.40 67.7 65.4 14.8 16.7 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2920 7200 0.41 70.0 13.9 B
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2920 660 7050 2000 0.41 0.33 59.2 55.2 16.4 17.9 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2300 7104 0.32 66.3 11.5 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3534 1234 7050 4000 0.50 0.31 62.0 60.6 19.0 16.5 B
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3460 7200 0.48 67.6 16.5 B
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4024 564 7050 2000 0.57 0.28 61.5 60.0 21.8 19.2 B
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3990 7104 0.56 66.8 19.9 C

1 5125 4904 1.99 49.81 66.3 13.5 13.5 6.90 B

Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2260 7104 0.32 66.8 11.3 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2260 596 7050 2200 0.32 0.27 64.5 62.0 11.7 14.4 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1700 7104 0.24 66.6 8.5 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2285 585 7050 2000 0.32 0.29 61.8 60.0 12.3 12.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2622 372 7050 2000 0.37 0.19 61.9 60.1 14.1 13.3 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2600 7104 0.37 66.8 13.0 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.962 2600 719 7200 2000 0.36 0.36 63.4 58.9 13.7 13.9 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1950 7200 0.27 69.7 9.3 A
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.952 2632 682 7200 2000 0.37 0.34 68.1 65.7 12.9 14.7 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2560 7200 0.36 70.0 12.2 B
Segment 11: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2560 532 7050 2000 0.36 0.27 59.1 55.2 14.4 15.8 B
Segment 12: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2060 7104 0.29 66.3 10.3 A
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3283 1223 7050 4000 0.47 0.31 61.8 60.4 17.7 15.3 B
Segment 14: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3210 7200 0.45 67.6 15.3 B
Segment 15: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3774 564 7050 2000 0.54 0.28 61.7 60.2 20.4 18.0 B
Segment 16: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3740 7104 0.53 66.8 18.7 C

1 5057 4823 2.36 58.97 66.1 13.4 13.4 6.90 B

71NB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2027 PM.xuf
2027 FREEWAY SOUTHBOUND
AM PEAK
Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 SB - No Build


1 Basic Basic I-71 SB N of SR 82 5700 4
2 Diverge Diverge I-71 SB diverge to SR 82 WB 1500 4
3 Basic Basic I-71 SB between exit to SR 82 WB and 270 3

exit to SR 82 EB
4 Diverge Diverge I-71 SB diverge to SR 82 EB 1500 3
5 Basic Basic I-71 SB between exit to SR 82 EB and 1970 3

SR 82 entrance
6 Merge Merge SR 82 merge to I-71 SB 1500 3
7 Basic Basic I-71 SB between SR 82 and SR 303 21550 3
8 Diverge Diverge I-71 SB diverge to SR 303 1500 3
9 Basic Basic I-71 SB between SR 303 ramps 3120 3
11 Basic Basic I-71 SB S of SR 303 6180 3
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3181 9328 0.34 63.2 12.6 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3181 851 9200 4000 0.35 0.21 60.4 52.5 13.2 3.3 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2330 7146 0.33 66.3 11.4 B

Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2330 426 7050 2000 0.33 0.21 59.9 56.0 13.0 16.2 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1904 7146 0.27 67.7 9.3 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2223 319 7050 2000 0.32 0.16 63.0 61.0 11.8 11.1 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2223 7131 0.31 67.7 10.9 A
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2223 713 7050 2000 0.32 0.36 59.1 55.6 12.5 15.3 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1511 7161 0.21 68.5 7.3 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2032 521 7050 2000 0.29 0.26 63.4 61.5 10.7 10.5 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2032 7161 0.28 68.7 9.9 A

1 5003 4647 1.29 32.14 65.8 11.0 11.0 8.00 A


71SB Freeway Facility No-Build 2027 AM.xuf
Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 SB - Alternative 1



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance
7 Basic Basic I-71 SB between SR 82 and Boston 7900 3

Road
8 Diverge Diverge I-71 SB diverge to Boston Road 1500 3
9 Basic Basic I-71 SB between Boston Road and SR 12150 3

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3213 9328 0.34 63.2 12.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3213 755 9200 4000 0.35 0.19 60.6 52.4 13.3 2.7 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2457 7131 0.34 66.0 12.1 B
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2457 415 7050 2000 0.35 0.21 59.7 55.7 13.7 16.9 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2043 7131 0.29 67.2 10.1 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2383 340 7050 2000 0.34 0.17 62.5 60.6 12.7 11.9 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2383 7131 0.33 67.7 11.7 B
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2383 401 7200 2000 0.33 0.20 64.6 59.9 12.3 12.1 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2021 7200 0.28 70.0 9.6 A
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2021 574 7050 2000 0.29 0.29 59.0 55.6 11.4 13.9 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1447 7146 0.20 68.0 7.1 A
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 1990 543 7050 2000 0.28 0.27 63.3 61.5 10.5 10.4 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1989 7161 0.28 68.7 9.7 A

1 4965 4608 1.60 40.06 66.1 10.9 10.9 8.00 A

71SB Freeway Facility Alternate 1 2027 AM.xuf
Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 SB - Alternatives 2 & 3



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3213 9328 0.34 63.2 12.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3213 755 9200 4000 0.35 0.19 60.6 52.4 13.3 2.7 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2457 7131 0.34 66.0 12.1 B
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2457 415 7050 2000 0.35 0.21 59.7 55.7 13.7 16.9 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2043 7131 0.29 67.2 10.1 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2383 340 7050 2000 0.34 0.17 62.5 60.6 12.7 11.9 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2383 7131 0.33 67.7 11.7 B
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2383 401 7200 2000 0.33 0.20 64.6 59.9 12.3 12.1 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2021 7200 0.28 70.0 9.6 A
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2021 574 7050 2000 0.29 0.29 59.0 55.6 11.4 13.9 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1447 7146 0.20 68.0 7.1 A
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 1990 543 7050 2000 0.28 0.27 63.3 61.5 10.5 10.4 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1989 7161 0.28 68.7 9.7 A

1 4965 4608 1.60 40.06 66.1 10.9 10.9 8.00 A

71SB Freeway Facility Alternates 2 and 3 2027 AM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road
9 Basic Basic I-71 SB between Boston Road ramps 2100 3
10 Merge Merge Boston Road merge to I-71 SB 1500 3

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2915 9328 0.31 63.2 11.5 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2915 777 9200 4000 0.32 0.19 60.2 52.4 12.1 2.2 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2138 7131 0.30 65.9 10.5 A
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2138 415 7050 2000 0.30 0.21 59.2 55.5 12.0 15.1 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1723 7116 0.24 66.7 8.5 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2000 277 7050 2000 0.28 0.14 62.3 60.3 10.7 10.0 A
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2000 7116 0.28 67.2 9.9 A
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2000 354 7200 2000 0.28 0.18 64.5 60.0 10.3 9.9 A
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1681 7200 0.23 69.7 8.0 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 2521 840 7200 2000 0.35 0.42 67.9 65.7 12.4 14.6 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2489 7200 0.35 70.0 11.9 B
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2489 830 7050 2000 0.35 0.41 58.2 54.8 14.3 17.1 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1660 7131 0.23 67.5 8.2 A
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2064 404 7050 2000 0.29 0.20 63.0 61.1 10.9 10.4 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2064 7161 0.29 68.7 10.0 A

1 4892 4497 1.85 46.14 66.0 10.7 10.7 8.00 A

Project Information
Project Description Boston Road Interchange - I-71 SB - Full Interchange



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2883 9328 0.31 63.2 11.4 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2883 734 9200 4000 0.31 0.18 60.4 52.5 11.9 1.9 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2149 7131 0.30 66.0 10.6 A
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2149 415 7050 2000 0.30 0.21 59.2 55.5 12.1 15.2 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1734 7116 0.24 66.7 8.6 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2032 298 7050 2000 0.29 0.15 62.3 60.3 10.9 10.2 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2032 7116 0.29 67.2 10.1 A
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2032 342 7200 2000 0.28 0.17 64.6 60.1 10.5 10.1 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1723 7200 0.24 69.7 8.2 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 2464 741 7200 2000 0.34 0.37 68.1 65.8 12.1 14.0 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2436 7200 0.34 70.0 11.6 B
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2436 777 7050 2000 0.35 0.39 58.4 54.9 13.9 16.6 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1660 7131 0.23 67.5 8.2 A
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2032 372 7050 2000 0.29 0.19 63.1 61.1 10.7 10.1 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2032 7161 0.28 68.7 9.9 A

1 4863 4477 1.80 44.98 66.0 10.7 10.7 8.00 A

71SB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2027 AM.xuf
PM PEAK
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5957 9328 0.64 63.2 23.6 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5957 1766 9200 4000 0.65 0.44 58.2 50.8 25.6 15.3 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4191 7146 0.59 65.8 20.5 C

Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4191 734 7050 2000 0.59 0.37 60.0 55.3 23.3 26.1 C
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3457 7146 0.48 67.7 16.9 B
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4042 585 7050 2000 0.57 0.29 61.6 60.0 21.9 20.4 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4043 7131 0.57 67.7 19.9 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4043 926 7050 2000 0.57 0.46 59.7 55.1 22.6 24.9 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3117 7161 0.44 68.5 15.1 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3691 574 7050 2000 0.52 0.29 62.4 60.7 19.7 18.5 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3691 7161 0.52 68.7 17.9 B

1 9207 8577 2.72 68.11 65.6 20.3 20.3 8.00 C


71SB Freeway Facility No-Build 2027 PM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6234 9328 0.67 63.1 24.7 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6234 1255 9200 4000 0.68 0.31 58.9 51.5 26.5 12.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4979 7131 0.70 65.6 25.2 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4979 713 7050 2000 0.71 0.36 59.8 55.1 27.8 29.6 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4266 7131 0.60 67.2 21.1 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4947 681 7050 2000 0.70 0.34 60.1 58.5 27.4 24.9 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4947 7131 0.69 66.1 24.9 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4947 1418 7200 2000 0.69 0.71 62.5 56.8 26.4 26.6 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3543 7200 0.49 70.0 16.9 B
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3543 734 7050 2000 0.50 0.37 59.8 55.3 19.7 22.2 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2809 7146 0.39 68.0 13.7 B
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3383 574 7050 2000 0.48 0.29 62.6 60.9 18.0 17.0 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3383 7161 0.47 68.7 16.4 B

1 9429 8779 4.42 110.47 65.4 20.8 20.8 8.00 C

71SB Freeway Facility Alternate 1 2027 PM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6234 9328 0.67 63.1 24.7 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6234 1255 9200 4000 0.68 0.31 58.9 51.5 26.5 12.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4979 7131 0.70 65.6 25.2 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4979 713 7050 2000 0.71 0.36 59.8 55.1 27.8 29.6 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4266 7131 0.60 67.2 21.1 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4947 681 7050 2000 0.70 0.34 60.1 58.5 27.4 24.9 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4947 7131 0.69 66.1 24.9 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4947 1418 7200 2000 0.69 0.71 62.5 56.8 26.4 26.6 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3543 7200 0.49 70.0 16.9 B
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3543 734 7050 2000 0.50 0.37 59.8 55.3 19.7 22.2 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2809 7146 0.39 68.0 13.7 B
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3383 574 7050 2000 0.48 0.29 62.6 60.9 18.0 17.0 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3383 7161 0.47 68.7 16.4 B

1 9429 8779 4.42 110.47 65.4 20.8 20.8 8.00 C

71SB Freeway Facility Alternates 2 and 3 2027 PM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5947 9328 0.64 63.2 23.5 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5947 1372 9200 4000 0.65 0.34 58.8 51.3 25.3 12.8 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4574 7131 0.64 65.6 22.8 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4574 734 7050 2000 0.65 0.37 59.4 54.8 25.7 27.9 C
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3840 7116 0.54 66.7 19.0 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4425 585 7050 2000 0.63 0.29 60.4 58.9 24.4 22.2 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4426 7116 0.62 66.9 22.0 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4426 1343 7200 2000 0.61 0.67 62.5 57.1 23.6 24.2 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3096 7200 0.43 69.6 14.7 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.957 3819 723 7200 2000 0.53 0.36 67.2 64.8 18.9 20.3 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3787 7200 0.53 70.0 18.0 B
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3787 915 7050 2000 0.54 0.46 59.0 54.6 21.4 23.7 C
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2872 7131 0.40 67.5 14.1 B
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3446 574 7050 2000 0.49 0.29 62.2 60.5 18.5 17.3 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3447 7161 0.48 68.7 16.7 B

1 9112 8439 4.06 101.58 65.5 20.1 20.1 8.00 C

Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6160 9328 0.66 63.1 24.4 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6160 1500 9200 4000 0.67 0.38 58.4 51.0 26.4 14.1 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4660 7131 0.65 65.5 23.2 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4660 638 7050 2000 0.66 0.32 59.6 55.0 26.1 28.1 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4021 7116 0.57 66.7 19.9 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4649 628 7050 2000 0.66 0.31 60.1 58.6 25.8 23.4 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4649 7116 0.65 66.5 23.3 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4649 1451 7200 2000 0.65 0.73 62.2 56.7 24.9 25.4 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3213 7200 0.45 69.6 15.3 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 4009 796 7200 2000 0.56 0.40 67.0 64.6 19.9 21.4 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3979 7200 0.55 69.8 19.0 C
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3979 926 7050 2000 0.56 0.46 59.1 54.6 22.4 24.7 C
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3053 7131 0.43 67.5 15.0 B
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3627 574 7050 2000 0.51 0.29 62.0 60.4 19.5 18.2 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3628 7161 0.51 68.7 17.6 B

1 9533 8827 4.61 115.23 65.4 21.1 21.1 8.00 C

71SB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2027 PM.xuf
AM PEAK
Project Information



303 EB entrance

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2690 7104 0.38 66.8 13.4 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2690 543 7050 2200 0.38 0.25 65.3 62.5 13.7 16.6 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2180 7104 0.31 66.7 10.9 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3520 1340 7050 2000 0.50 0.67 61.4 59.8 19.1 20.7 C
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3759 319 7050 2000 0.53 0.16 62.0 60.3 20.2 18.5 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3740 7104 0.53 66.8 18.7 C
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3740 394 7050 2000 0.53 0.20 60.7 56.1 20.5 21.5 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3370 7104 0.47 66.4 16.8 B
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5359 1989 7050 4000 0.76 0.50 59.0 57.1 30.3 26.8 C
Segment 10: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5240 7200 0.73 66.5 26.3 D
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 6112 872 7050 2000 0.87 0.44 58.0 55.9 35.1 29.9 D
Segment 12: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 6060 7104 0.85 60.5 33.4 D

1 7589 7283 5.42 135.58 64.1 20.7 20.7 7.10 C

71NB Freeway Facility 2047 No Build AM.xuf
Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2530 7104 0.36 66.8 12.6 B
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2530 543 7050 2200 0.36 0.25 65.3 62.5 12.9 15.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2020 7104 0.28 66.7 10.1 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2775 755 7050 2000 0.39 0.38 61.9 60.1 14.9 15.6 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2900 170 7050 2000 0.41 0.09 62.2 60.4 15.5 14.1 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2890 7104 0.41 66.8 14.4 B
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4649 1759 7200 2000 0.65 0.88 64.7 62.3 24.0 27.0 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 4510 7200 0.63 68.9 21.8 C
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4510 426 7050 2000 0.64 0.21 60.4 55.7 24.9 25.2 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4110 7104 0.58 66.4 20.5 C
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5546 1436 7050 4000 0.79 0.36 59.1 57.4 31.3 26.0 C
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5460 7200 0.76 65.6 27.7 D
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 6088 628 7050 2000 0.86 0.31 58.0 56.2 35.0 29.1 D
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 6050 7104 0.85 60.6 33.3 D

1 7544 7218 6.33 158.31 64.5 20.4 20.4 7.10 C

Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2530 7104 0.36 66.8 12.6 B
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2530 543 7050 2200 0.36 0.25 65.3 62.5 12.9 15.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2020 7104 0.28 66.7 10.1 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2775 755 7050 2000 0.39 0.38 61.9 60.1 14.9 15.6 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2900 170 7050 2000 0.41 0.09 62.2 60.4 15.5 14.1 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2890 7104 0.41 66.8 14.4 B
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4649 1759 7200 2000 0.65 0.88 64.7 62.3 24.0 27.0 C
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 4510 7200 0.63 68.9 21.8 C
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4510 426 7050 2000 0.64 0.21 60.2 55.7 25.0 25.6 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4110 7104 0.58 66.4 20.5 C
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5546 1436 7050 4000 0.79 0.36 59.1 57.4 31.3 26.0 C
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5460 7200 0.76 65.6 27.7 D
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 6088 628 7050 2000 0.86 0.31 58.0 56.2 35.0 29.1 D
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 6050 7104 0.85 60.6 33.3 D

1 7429 7103 6.28 156.95 64.4 20.2 20.2 7.10 C

Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2710 7104 0.38 66.8 13.5 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2710 500 7050 2200 0.38 0.23 65.1 62.2 13.9 16.6 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2240 7104 0.32 66.7 11.2 B
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3229 989 7050 2000 0.46 0.49 61.1 59.5 17.6 18.4 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3489 319 7050 2000 0.49 0.16 61.4 59.7 18.9 17.3 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3470 7104 0.49 66.8 17.3 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.917 3470 441 7200 2000 0.48 0.22 65.2 59.8 17.7 17.9 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3090 7200 0.43 69.8 14.7 B
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.980 4545 1455 7200 2000 0.63 0.73 65.4 63.0 23.2 25.7 C
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4430 7200 0.62 69.1 21.4 C
Segment 11: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4430 372 7050 2000 0.63 0.19 60.2 55.6 24.5 24.7 C
Segment 12: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 4080 7104 0.57 66.4 20.4 C
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 5516 1436 7050 4000 0.78 0.36 58.8 57.2 31.3 25.9 C
Segment 14: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 5430 7200 0.75 65.7 27.5 D
Segment 15: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 6143 713 7050 2000 0.87 0.36 57.8 55.9 35.4 29.6 D
Segment 16: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 6100 7104 0.86 60.3 33.7 D

1 7805 7467 6.91 172.71 64.4 21.2 21.2 7.10 C

71NB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2047 AM.xuf
PM PEAK
Project Information



303 EB entrance

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2340 7104 0.33 66.8 11.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2340 713 7050 2200 0.33 0.32 64.6 62.1 12.1 15.1 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1670 7104 0.24 66.6 8.3 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2425 755 7050 2000 0.34 0.38 62.4 60.6 13.0 14.0 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2752 372 7050 2000 0.39 0.19 62.7 60.8 14.6 13.9 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2730 7104 0.38 66.8 13.6 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2730 564 7050 2000 0.39 0.28 59.7 55.7 15.2 16.7 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2200 7104 0.31 66.3 11.0 A
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3753 1553 7050 4000 0.53 0.39 61.9 60.5 20.2 18.3 B
Segment 10: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3660 7200 0.51 67.6 17.4 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4245 585 7050 2000 0.60 0.29 61.6 60.1 23.0 20.3 C
Segment 12: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4210 7104 0.59 66.7 21.0 C

1 5497 5276 1.89 47.27 65.6 14.6 14.6 7.00 B

71NB Freeway Facility 2047 No Build PM.xuf
Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2310 7104 0.33 66.8 11.5 B
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2310 691 7050 2200 0.33 0.31 64.7 62.2 11.9 14.8 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1660 7104 0.23 66.6 8.3 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2054 394 7050 2000 0.29 0.20 62.5 60.5 11.0 11.3 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2296 266 7050 2000 0.33 0.13 62.6 60.6 12.2 11.5 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2280 7104 0.32 66.8 11.4 B
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.952 3185 905 7200 2000 0.44 0.45 67.6 65.3 15.7 17.8 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 3090 7200 0.43 70.0 14.7 B
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3090 660 7050 2000 0.44 0.33 59.4 55.2 17.3 18.8 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2470 7104 0.35 66.3 12.3 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3704 1234 7050 4000 0.53 0.31 61.9 60.5 19.9 17.2 B
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3630 7200 0.50 67.6 17.3 B
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4194 564 7050 2000 0.59 0.28 61.3 59.8 22.8 20.0 B
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 4160 7104 0.59 66.8 20.8 C

1 5429 5200 2.11 52.86 66.4 14.3 14.3 6.90 B

Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2170 7104 0.31 66.8 10.8 A
Segment 2: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2170 606 7050 2200 0.31 0.28 64.9 62.4 11.1 13.9 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1600 7104 0.23 66.7 8.0 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 1972 372 7050 2000 0.28 0.19 62.5 60.5 10.5 10.9 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2216 266 7050 2000 0.31 0.13 62.6 60.6 11.8 11.1 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2200 7104 0.31 66.8 11.0 A
Segment 7: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.952 3005 805 7200 2000 0.42 0.40 67.7 65.4 14.8 16.7 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2920 7200 0.41 70.0 13.9 B
Segment 9: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2920 660 7050 2000 0.41 0.33 59.2 55.2 16.4 17.9 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2300 7104 0.32 66.3 11.5 B
Segment 11: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3534 1234 7050 4000 0.50 0.31 62.0 60.6 19.0 16.5 B
Segment 12: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3460 7200 0.48 67.6 16.5 B
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 4024 564 7050 2000 0.57 0.28 61.5 60.0 21.8 19.2 B
Segment 14: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3990 7104 0.56 66.8 19.9 C

1 5125 4904 1.99 49.81 66.3 13.5 13.5 6.90 B

Project Information



303 EB entrance

303

Road

82 EB entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2490 7104 0.35 66.8 12.4 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2490 649 7050 2200 0.35 0.29 64.5 61.9 12.9 15.7 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1880 7104 0.26 66.6 9.4 A
Segment 4: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2465 585 7050 2000 0.35 0.29 61.7 59.9 13.3 13.7 B
Segment 5: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2802 372 7050 2000 0.40 0.19 61.8 60.0 15.1 14.2 B
Segment 6: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2780 7104 0.39 66.8 13.9 B
Segment 7: Diverge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.962 2780 885 7200 2000 0.39 0.44 62.8 58.4 14.8 15.3 B
Segment 8: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 1980 7200 0.28 69.7 9.4 A
Segment 9: Merge
1 1.00 0.94 1.000 0.952 2796 816 7200 2000 0.39 0.41 67.9 65.6 13.7 15.8 B
Segment 10: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 2710 7200 0.38 70.0 12.9 B
Segment 11: Diverge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 2710 532 7050 2000 0.38 0.27 59.2 55.2 15.3 16.6 B
Segment 12: Basic
1 1.00 1.000 2210 7104 0.31 66.3 11.0 A
Segment 13: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3433 1223 7050 4000 0.49 0.31 61.7 60.3 18.5 16.0 B
Segment 14: Overlap

1 1.00 1.000 3360 7200 0.47 67.5 16.0 B
Segment 15: Merge

1 1.00 0.94 1.000 1.000 3924 564 7050 2000 0.56 0.28 61.6 60.1 21.2 18.7 B
Segment 16: Basic

1 1.00 1.000 3890 7104 0.55 66.8 19.4 C

1 5363 5119 2.56 64.01 66.1 14.2 14.2 6.90 B

71NB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2047 PM.xuf
AM PEAK
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3309 9328 0.35 63.2 13.1 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3309 851 9200 4000 0.36 0.21 60.6 52.5 13.7 3.6 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2457 7146 0.34 66.4 12.0 B

Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2457 468 7050 2000 0.35 0.23 59.9 55.9 13.7 17.0 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1989 7146 0.28 67.7 9.7 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2329 340 7050 2000 0.33 0.17 63.0 61.0 12.3 11.7 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2330 7131 0.33 67.7 11.5 B
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2330 787 7050 2000 0.33 0.39 58.9 55.4 13.2 16.1 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1543 7161 0.22 68.5 7.5 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2096 553 7050 2000 0.30 0.28 63.3 61.4 11.0 10.9 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2096 7161 0.29 68.7 10.2 A

1 5218 4845 1.35 33.63 65.8 11.5 11.5 8.00 B


71SB Freeway Facility 2047 No Build AM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3394 9328 0.36 63.2 13.4 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3394 755 9200 4000 0.37 0.19 60.7 52.4 14.0 3.1 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2638 7131 0.37 66.0 13.0 B
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2638 415 7050 2000 0.37 0.21 59.8 55.7 14.7 17.8 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2223 7131 0.31 67.2 10.9 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2595 372 7050 2000 0.37 0.19 62.4 60.5 13.9 13.0 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2596 7131 0.36 67.7 12.8 B
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2596 531 7200 2000 0.36 0.27 64.2 59.5 13.5 13.5 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2117 7200 0.29 70.0 10.1 A
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2117 617 7050 2000 0.30 0.31 59.0 55.5 12.0 14.5 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1500 7146 0.21 68.0 7.3 A
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2149 649 7050 2000 0.30 0.32 63.2 61.4 11.3 11.4 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2149 7161 0.30 68.7 10.4 A

1 5296 4910 1.73 43.35 66.1 11.6 11.6 8.00 B

Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3394 9328 0.36 63.2 13.4 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3394 755 9200 4000 0.37 0.19 60.7 52.4 14.0 3.1 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2638 7131 0.37 66.0 13.0 B
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2638 415 7050 2000 0.37 0.21 59.8 55.7 14.7 17.8 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2223 7131 0.31 67.2 10.9 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2595 372 7050 2000 0.37 0.19 62.4 60.5 13.9 13.0 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2596 7131 0.36 67.7 12.8 B
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2596 531 7200 2000 0.36 0.27 64.2 59.5 13.5 13.5 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2117 7200 0.29 70.0 10.1 A
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2117 617 7050 2000 0.30 0.31 59.0 55.5 12.0 14.5 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1500 7146 0.21 68.0 7.3 A
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2149 649 7050 2000 0.30 0.32 63.2 61.4 11.3 11.4 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2149 7161 0.30 68.7 10.4 A

1 5296 4910 1.73 43.35 66.1 11.6 11.6 8.00 B

71SB Freeway Facility Alternates 2 and 3 2047 AM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2989 9328 0.32 63.2 11.8 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2989 777 9200 4000 0.32 0.19 60.3 52.4 12.4 2.4 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2213 7131 0.31 65.9 10.9 A
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2213 415 7050 2000 0.31 0.21 59.2 55.5 12.5 15.5 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1798 7116 0.25 66.7 8.9 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2117 319 7050 2000 0.30 0.16 62.2 60.3 11.3 10.6 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2117 7116 0.30 67.2 10.5 A
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2117 472 7200 2000 0.29 0.24 64.1 59.7 11.0 10.8 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1691 7200 0.23 69.7 8.1 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 2764 1073 7200 2000 0.38 0.54 67.6 65.5 13.6 16.3 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2723 7200 0.38 70.0 13.0 B
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2723 926 7050 2000 0.39 0.46 58.0 54.6 15.6 18.7 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1798 7131 0.25 67.5 8.8 A
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2255 457 7050 2000 0.32 0.23 62.9 61.0 12.0 11.4 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2255 7161 0.31 68.7 10.9 A

1 5211 4775 2.01 50.35 66.0 11.4 11.4 8.00 B

Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2968 9328 0.32 63.2 11.7 B
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2968 734 9200 4000 0.32 0.18 60.5 52.5 12.3 2.1 A
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2234 7131 0.31 66.0 11.0 A
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2234 415 7050 2000 0.32 0.21 59.3 55.5 12.6 15.7 B
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1819 7116 0.26 66.7 9.0 A
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2159 340 7050 2000 0.31 0.17 62.2 60.3 11.6 10.9 B
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 2160 7116 0.30 67.2 10.7 A
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.901 2160 460 7200 2000 0.30 0.23 64.1 59.7 11.2 11.0 B
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 1745 7200 0.24 69.7 8.3 A
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 2685 940 7200 2000 0.37 0.47 67.7 65.6 13.2 15.6 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2649 7200 0.37 70.0 12.6 B
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2649 819 7050 2000 0.38 0.41 58.4 54.8 15.1 17.9 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 1830 7131 0.26 67.5 9.0 A
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 2245 415 7050 2000 0.32 0.21 63.0 61.1 11.9 11.3 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2245 7161 0.31 68.7 10.9 A

1 5195 4770 1.96 48.94 66.1 11.4 11.4 8.00 B

71SB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2047 AM.xuf
PM PEAK
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6181 9328 0.66 63.1 24.5 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6181 1777 9200 4000 0.67 0.44 58.1 50.7 26.6 15.9 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4404 7146 0.62 65.8 21.7 C

Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4404 809 7050 2000 0.62 0.40 59.8 55.1 24.5 27.3 C
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3596 7146 0.50 67.7 17.6 B
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4224 628 7050 2000 0.60 0.31 61.4 59.8 22.9 21.4 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4223 7131 0.59 67.5 20.9 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4223 1021 7050 2000 0.60 0.51 59.5 54.8 23.7 26.0 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3202 7161 0.45 68.5 15.5 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3862 660 7050 2000 0.55 0.33 62.2 60.5 20.7 19.5 B
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3862 7161 0.54 68.7 18.7 C

1 9598 8936 3.16 78.89 65.5 21.2 21.2 8.00 C


71SB Freeway Facility 2047 No Build PM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6702 9328 0.72 62.6 26.8 D
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6702 1372 9200 4000 0.73 0.34 58.6 51.3 28.6 14.5 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5330 7131 0.75 64.7 27.5 D
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5330 723 7050 2000 0.76 0.36 59.7 55.0 29.8 31.1 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4606 7131 0.65 67.0 22.9 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5297 691 7050 2000 0.75 0.35 59.5 57.9 29.7 26.6 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5298 7131 0.74 64.9 27.2 D
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 5298 1741 7200 2000 0.74 0.87 61.6 55.9 28.7 28.8 D
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3574 7200 0.50 70.0 17.0 B
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3574 766 7050 2000 0.51 0.38 59.7 55.2 20.0 22.4 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2809 7146 0.39 68.0 13.7 B
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3479 670 7050 2000 0.49 0.34 62.5 60.8 18.6 17.7 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3479 7161 0.49 68.7 16.9 B

1 9885 9201 5.72 143.05 64.9 22.0 22.0 8.10 C

Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6702 9328 0.72 62.6 26.8 D
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6702 1372 9200 4000 0.73 0.34 58.6 51.3 28.6 14.5 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5330 7131 0.75 64.7 27.5 D
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5330 723 7050 2000 0.76 0.36 59.7 55.0 29.8 31.1 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4606 7131 0.65 67.0 22.9 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 5297 691 7050 2000 0.75 0.35 59.5 57.9 29.7 26.6 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 5298 7131 0.74 64.9 27.2 D
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 5298 1741 7200 2000 0.74 0.87 61.6 55.9 28.7 28.8 D
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3574 7200 0.50 70.0 17.0 B
Segment 10: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3574 766 7050 2000 0.51 0.38 59.7 55.2 20.0 22.4 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2809 7146 0.39 68.0 13.7 B
Segment 12: Merge


1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3479 670 7050 2000 0.49 0.34 62.5 60.8 18.6 17.7 B
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3479 7161 0.49 68.7 16.9 B

1 9885 9201 5.72 143.05 64.9 22.0 22.0 8.10 C

71SB Freeway Facility Alternates 2 and 3 2047 PM.xuf
Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6277 9328 0.67 63.1 24.9 C
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6277 1426 9200 4000 0.68 0.36 58.6 51.2 26.8 13.9 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4851 7131 0.68 65.5 24.4 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4851 777 7050 2000 0.69 0.39 59.3 54.7 27.3 29.2 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4074 7116 0.57 66.7 20.2 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4691 617 7050 2000 0.67 0.31 60.1 58.6 26.0 23.5 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4691 7116 0.66 66.4 23.6 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4691 1612 7200 2000 0.65 0.81 61.7 56.3 25.3 26.0 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3096 7200 0.43 69.6 14.7 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.957 3941 845 7200 2000 0.55 0.42 66.9 64.6 19.6 21.2 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3904 7200 0.54 69.9 18.6 C
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3904 915 7050 2000 0.55 0.46 59.1 54.6 22.0 24.3 C
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 2989 7131 0.42 67.5 14.7 B
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3638 649 7050 2000 0.52 0.32 62.0 60.3 19.6 18.4 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3638 7161 0.51 68.7 17.7 B

1 9557 8843 4.70 117.62 65.3 21.2 21.2 8.10 C

Project Information



exit to SR 82 EB

SR 82 entrance

Road

303
Segment 1: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 6606 9328 0.71 62.7 26.3 D
Segment 2: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 6606 1745 9200 4000 0.72 0.44 57.8 50.6 28.6 16.6 B
Segment 3: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4862 7131 0.68 65.3 24.4 C
Segment 4: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4862 713 7050 2000 0.69 0.36 59.4 54.8 27.3 29.1 D
Segment 5: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4149 7116 0.58 66.7 20.6 C
Segment 6: Merge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4904 755 7050 2000 0.70 0.38 59.8 58.2 27.3 24.9 C
Segment 7: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 4904 7116 0.69 65.9 24.8 C
Segment 8: Diverge
1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.990 4904 1709 7200 2000 0.68 0.85 61.4 56.0 26.6 27.4 C
Segment 9: Basic
1 0.94 1.000 3213 7200 0.45 69.5 15.3 B
Segment 10: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 0.962 4076 863 7200 2000 0.57 0.43 66.8 64.4 20.3 21.9 C
Segment 11: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 4043 7200 0.56 69.7 19.3 C
Segment 12: Diverge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 4043 957 7050 2000 0.57 0.48 59.0 54.5 22.8 25.0 C
Segment 13: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3085 7131 0.43 67.5 15.2 B
Segment 14: Merge

1 0.94 0.94 1.000 1.000 3734 649 7050 2000 0.53 0.32 61.9 60.3 20.1 18.9 B
Segment 15: Basic

1 0.94 1.000 3734 7161 0.52 68.7 18.1 C

1 9924 9177 5.51 137.78 65.0 22.0 22.0 8.10 C

71SB Freeway Facility Full Interchange 2047 PM.xuf
APPENDIX N
TURN LANE LENGTH CALCULATIONS

Boston Road Corridor Build Alternate 1 Recommended Turn Lanes
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Pearl Intersection

Existing
Design DHV DHV Cycles per Cycles per Avg V/cycle Avg V/cycle Storage Length Storage Length Larger Storage Total Condition Total Calculated Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Recommended Consider Dual Recommended Length
Condition A B C Avg V/cycle (AM) Avg V/cycle (PM) Lane
Speed (AM) (PM) Hour (AM) Hour (PM) (AM) (PM) (AM) (PM) Length A Condition C Length Queue (AM)* Thru Queue (AM) Queue (PM)* Thru Queue (PM) Length Lanes? for Dual Lanes
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 140 40 36 1.8 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 54 269 120 492 492 N/A 150
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 140 40 36 3.8 3.9 4 4 175 175 175 225 290 290 66 269 61 492 492 N/A N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 50 40 36 1.8 1.4 2 2 100 75 100 150 215 215 58 323 42 331 331 N/A 60
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 360 40 36 3.8 10.0 4 10 175 375 375 425 490 490 176 207 408 237 490 Y 245 130
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 140 40 36 2.0 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 29 207 71 237 290 N/A N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 40 100 40 36 1.0 2.8 1 3 50 150 150 200 265 265 36 184 112 511 511 N/A 410
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 20 170 40 36 0.5 4.7 1 5 50 200 200 250 315 315 13 184 137 511 511 N/A 410
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Howe Intersection

Condition A B C Avg V/cycle (AM) Avg V/cycle (PM)
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 140 40 36 6.5 3.9 7 4 275 175 275 325 390 390 379 80 147 64 390 N/A
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 220 40 36 3.8 6.1 4 7 175 275 275 325 390 390 117 296 94 501 501 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 210 40 36 1.8 5.8 2 6 100 250 250 300 365 365 72 N/A 239 N/A 365 N/A
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 50 160 40 36 1.3 4.4 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 49 N/A 184 N/A 315 N/A
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - SB Ramps/Carpenter Intersection

NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 280 40 36 3.8 7.8 4 8 175 325 325 375 440 440 136 N/A 337 N/A 440 N/A
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 100 90 40 36 2.5 2.5 3 3 125 125 125 175 240 240 51 N/A 68 N/A 240 N/A
EB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 190 220 40 36 4.8 6.1 5 7 200 275 275 325 390 390 41 140 94 235 390 N/A
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 90 140 40 36 2.3 3.9 3 4 125 175 175 225 290 290 58 88 160 316 316 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 500 40 36 1.8 13.9 2 14 100 500 500 550 615 615 65 138 555 412 615 N/A
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 120 340 40 36 3.0 9.4 3 10 150 375 375 425 490 490 131 138 390 412 490 N/A
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Benbow Intersection

SB LT 25 A 50 125 115 30 30 60 60 0.5 0.5 1 1 50 50 50 100 165 100 10 N/A 20 N/A 100 N/A
SB RT 25 A 50 125 115 30 70 60 60 0.5 1.2 1 2 50 100 100 150 215 150 5 N/A 12.5 N/A 150 N/A
* Where modeling includes the use of 2 lanes, the Back of Queue length listed is the total for both lanes

Existing
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 140 40 36 1.8 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 54 269 120 492 492 N/A 150
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 140 40 36 3.8 3.9 4 4 175 175 175 225 290 290 66 269 61 492 492 N/A N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 50 40 36 1.8 1.4 2 2 100 75 100 150 215 215 58 323 42 331 331 N/A 60
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 360 40 36 3.8 10.0 4 10 175 375 375 425 490 490 176 207 408 237 490 Y 245 130
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 140 40 36 2.0 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 29 207 71 237 290 N/A N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 40 100 40 36 1.0 2.8 1 3 50 150 150 200 265 265 36 184 112 511 511 N/A 410
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 20 170 40 36 0.5 4.7 1 5 50 200 200 250 315 315 13 184 137 511 511 N/A 410
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 140 33 33 7.9 4.2 8 5 325 200 325 375 440 440 64 172 151 156 440 N/A
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 220 33 33 4.5 6.7 5 7 200 275 275 325 390 390 60 223 59 510 510 N/A
SB LT 39 B or C 50 125 115 70 210 33 33 2.1 6.4 3 7 125 275 275 325 390 390 91 N/A 261 N/A 390 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 50 160 33 33 1.5 4.8 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 64 N/A 205 N/A 315 N/A

NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 280 33 33 4.5 8.5 5 9 200 350 350 400 465 465 118 N/A 256 N/A 465 N/A
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 610 350 33 33 18.5 10.6 19 11 650 400 650 700 765 765 508 N/A 229 N/A 765 N/A
EB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 190 220 33 33 5.8 6.7 6 7 250 275 275 325 390 390 182 278 120 236 390 N/A
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 90 140 33 33 2.7 4.2 3 5 150 200 200 250 315 315 110 85 181 168 315 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 500 33 33 2.1 15.2 3 16 125 550 550 600 665 665 53 115 572 350 665 Y 333
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 120 340 33 33 3.6 10.3 4 11 175 400 400 450 515 515 107 115 315 350 515 N/A
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - NB Ramps Intersection

EB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 560 970 33 33 17.0 29.4 17 30 600 945 945 995 1060 1060 212 46 288 478 1060 Y 530
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 250 650 33 33 7.6 19.7 8 20 325 675 675 725 790 790 265 26 138 124 790 N/A

Existing
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 140 40 36 1.8 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 54 269 120 492 492 N/A 150
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 140 40 36 3.8 3.9 4 4 175 175 175 225 290 290 66 269 61 492 492 N/A N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 50 40 36 1.8 1.4 2 2 100 75 100 150 215 215 58 323 42 331 331 N/A 60
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 360 40 36 3.8 10.0 4 10 175 375 375 425 490 490 176 207 408 237 490 Y 245 130
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 140 40 36 2.0 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 29 207 71 237 290 N/A N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 40 100 40 36 1.0 2.8 1 3 50 150 150 200 265 265 36 184 112 511 511 N/A 410
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 20 170 40 36 0.5 4.7 1 5 50 200 200 250 315 315 13 184 137 511 511 N/A 410
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 140 33 33 7.9 4.2 8 5 325 200 325 375 440 440 64 172 151 156 440 N/A
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 220 33 33 4.5 6.7 5 7 200 275 275 325 390 390 60 223 59 510 510 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 210 33 33 2.1 6.4 3 7 125 275 275 325 390 390 91 N/A 261 N/A 390 N/A
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 50 160 33 33 1.5 4.8 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 64 N/A 205 N/A 315 N/A

NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 280 33 33 4.5 8.5 5 9 200 350 350 400 465 465 118 N/A 256 N/A 465 N/A
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 610 350 33 33 18.5 10.6 19 11 650 400 650 700 765 765 508 N/A 229 N/A 765 N/A
EB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 190 220 33 33 5.8 6.7 6 7 250 275 275 325 390 390 182 278 120 236 390 N/A
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 90 140 33 33 2.7 4.2 3 5 150 200 200 250 315 315 110 85 181 168 315 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 500 33 33 2.1 15.2 3 16 125 550 550 600 665 665 53 115 572 350 665 Y 333
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 120 340 33 33 3.6 10.3 4 11 175 400 400 450 515 515 107 115 315 350 515 N/A

EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 970 560 33 33 29.4 17.0 30 17 945 600 945 995 1060 1060 520 1 124 11 1060 Y 530
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 650 250 33 33 19.7 7.6 20 8 675 325 675 725 790 790 448 136 38 88 790 N/A
Grafton/Carpenter Build Alternates 1, 2, & 3 Recommended Turn Lanes
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Grafton/Carpenter Intersection

Existing
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 50 180 30 36 1.7 5.0 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 48 194 134 252 315 N/A 280
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 90 30 36 2.3 2.5 3 3 125 125 125 175 240 240 70 524 70 368 524 N/A 350
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 150 30 36 5.0 4.2 5 5 200 200 200 250 315 315 152 274 118 417 417 N/A 410
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 60 40 30 36 2.0 1.1 2 2 100 75 100 150 215 215 52 199 32 206 215 N/A 280
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 100 120 30 36 3.3 3.3 4 4 175 175 175 225 290 290 88 199 82 206 290 N/A N/A
Drake/Hunt Build Alternates 1, 2, & 3 Recommended Turn Lanes
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Drake/Hunt Intersection

Existing
Length
EB RT 40 A 50 125 115 120 250 60 60 2.0 4.2 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 18 45 55 160 315 N/A N/A

Existing
Design DHV DHV Cycles per Cycles per Avg V/cycle Avg V/cycle Storage Length Storage Length Larger Storage Total Condition Total Calculated Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Modeled Back of Recommended Consider Recommended Length
Speed (AM) (PM) Hour (AM) Hour (PM) (AM) (PM) (AM) (PM) Length A Condition C Length Queue (AM)* Thru Queue (AM) Queue (PM)* Thru Queue (PM) Length Dual Lanes? for Dual Lanes
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 130 40 36 2.0 3.6 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 62 253 109 525 525 N/A 150
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 160 40 36 3.8 4.4 4 5 175 200 200 250 315 315 69 253 75 525 525 N/A N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 60 40 36 1.8 1.7 2 2 100 100 100 150 215 215 59 315 51 337 337 N/A 60
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 140 300 40 36 3.5 8.3 4 9 175 325 325 375 440 440 164 190 350 303 440 Y 220 130
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 140 40 36 2.0 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 39 190 71 303 303 N/A N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 60 120 40 36 1.5 3.3 2 4 75 175 175 225 290 290 53 162 134 484 484 N/A 410
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 20 110 40 36 0.5 3.1 1 4 50 175 175 225 290 290 13 162 81 484 484 N/A 410
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Howe/Carpenter Intersection

NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 190 36 30 1.9 6.3 2 7 100 275 275 325 390 390 61 399 208 428 428 N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 150 36 30 7.2 5.0 8 5 300 200 300 350 415 415 195 308 170 293 415 N/A
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 130 500 36 30 3.6 16.7 4 17 175 600 600 650 715 715 107 219 404 321 715 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 220 190 36 30 6.1 6.3 7 7 275 275 275 325 390 390 236 63 233 296 390 N/A
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - SB Ramps Intersection

EB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 640 460 36 30 17.8 15.3 18 16 625 550 625 675 740 740 694 145 124 92 740 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 140 480 36 30 3.9 16.0 4 16 175 550 550 600 665 665 173 N/A 435 N/A 665 N/A
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 1020 36 30 7.2 34.0 8 34 300 1095 1095 1145 1210 1210 328 N/A 1086 N/A 1210 Y 605
Boston Road Corridor Build Full Interchange Recommended Turn Lanes

Existing
Length
NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 70 140 40 36 1.8 3.9 2 4 100 175 175 225 290 290 44 265 118 451 451 N/A 150
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 150 140 40 36 3.8 3.9 4 4 175 175 175 225 290 290 105 265 62 451 451 N/A N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 50 40 36 2.0 1.4 2 2 100 75 100 150 215 215 67 340 42 328 340 N/A 60
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 160 320 40 36 4.0 8.9 4 9 175 350 350 400 465 465 206 178 372 266 465 Y 232.5 130
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 80 150 40 36 2.0 4.2 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 315 67 178 76 266 315 N/A N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 60 120 40 36 1.5 3.3 2 4 75 175 175 225 290 290 38 163 134 490 490 N/A 410
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 20 150 40 36 0.5 4.2 1 5 50 200 200 250 315 315 13 163 115 490 490 N/A 410
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Howe/Carpenter Intersection

NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 90 70 45 36 2.0 1.9 2 2 100 100 100 150 215 215 36 100 26 200 215 N/A
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 140 45 36 5.8 3.9 6 4 250 175 250 300 365 365 178 422 132 411 422 N/A
WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 140 450 45 36 3.1 12.5 4 13 175 475 475 525 590 590 143 199 422 400 590 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 180 210 45 36 4.0 5.8 4 6 175 250 250 300 365 365 168 54 256 242 365 Y 182.5
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - SB Ramps Intersection

WB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 310 270 45 36 6.9 7.5 7 8 275 300 300 350 415 415 142 146 264 279 415 N/A
SB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 130 710 45 36 2.9 19.7 3 20 150 675 675 725 790 790 102 N/A 725 N/A 790 N/A
SB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 260 880 45 36 5.8 24.4 6 25 250 825 825 875 940 940 208 N/A 714 N/A 940 Y 470

NB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 290 560 45 36 6.4 15.6 7 16 275 550 550 600 665 665 262 N/A 617 N/A 665 N/A
NB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 90 240 45 36 2.0 6.7 2 7 100 275 275 325 390 390 73 N/A 208 N/A 390
EB LT 40 B or C 50 125 115 690 480 45 36 15.3 13.3 16 14 550 500 550 600 665 665 542 95 454 721 721 Y 361
WB RT 40 B or C 50 125 115 650 250 45 36 14.4 6.9 15 7 525 275 525 575 640 640 559 108 263 447 640 N/A
Drake/Hunt Build Alternates 4 & Full Interchange Recommended Turn Lanes
Turn Lane Lengths per L&D Volume 1 Guidance - Drake/Hunt Intersection

Existing
Length
EB RT 40 A 50 125 115 110 250 60 60 1.8 4.2 2 5 100 200 200 250 315 250 15 50 53 153 250 N/A N/A

CUY MED Traffic Study PID 116069 Preliminary Feasibility Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CUY MED Traffic Study PID 116069 Preliminary Feasibility Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

8235 Mohawk Dr, Cleveland, OH 44136

PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY

REPORT PREPARED ON: JUNE 2, 2023

II. Preliminary Purpose and Need............................................................................... 8

III. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 10

IV. Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................... 11

V. Key Issues ........................................................................................................... 18

Traffic Analysis: ................................................................................................................................... 18

Roadway Design Issues: ....................................................................................................................... 18

Maintenance of Traffic: ...................................................................................................................... 18

Structural Design Issues: ..................................................................................................................... 18

Environmental Analysis: ...................................................................................................................... 18

Utility Impacts: .................................................................................................................................... 18

Estimated Construction Cost: ............................................................................................................ 19

VI. Comparison of Alternatives - Traffic ..................................................................... 19

VII. Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 22

VIII.Next Steps ........................................................................................................... 22

Table 2 – Total Delay for Study Area Intersections

Table 3 – Total Delay for Study Area Freeway

Table 4 – Ramp Influence Area Density Comparison

Table 5 – Alternative Performance Comparison

Table 6 – Traffic Delay Benefit to Cost Ratio

Figure 2 – Study Limits

Figure 3 – No Build/Existing Conditions Exhibit

Figure 4 – Alternative 1 Layout Exhibit

Figure 5 – Alternative 2 Layout Exhibit

Figure 6 – Alternative 3 Layout Exhibit

Figure 7 – Alternative 4 Layout Exhibit

Figure 8 – Full Interchange Layout Exhibit

Appendix B – Preliminary Project Initiation Package

Appendix C – Safety Priorities

Appendix D – Crash Analysis

Appendix E – Environmental Overview

Appendix G – Traffic Volumes Methodology

Appendix H – Traffic Plates

Appendix I – Supporting Traffic Information

Appendix J – Traffic Analyses

Appendix K – Level of Service Comparison Exhibits

Appendix L – HCS Analysis - Intersections

Appendix M – HCS Analysis – Freeway Facility

Appendix N – Turn Lane Length Calculations

A map of the Study Area is shown in Figure 1.

II. PRELIMINARY PURPOSE AND NEED

Logical Termini and Independent Utility

Estimated Construction Cost:

Table 1 – Estimated Construction and Right-of-Way Cost in $Millions

Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Full

VI. COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES - TRAFFIC

Table 2: Total Delay for Study Area Intersections – Design Year

Table 3: Total Delay for Study Area Freeway – Design Year

Tables 5 provides a general comparison of performance based on estimated costs, operational

Table 5: Design Year Alternative Performance Comparison

Estimated Cost Freeway Total Benefit to

VIII. NEXT STEPS

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS POINTS

Figure 2 - Intersection Analysis Points (I-71/Boston Rd)

Figure 4 – Existing Ramp Junction Analysis Points

PRELIMINARY PROJECT INITIATION PACKAGE

Project Initiation Package Deliverables

Date(s) of field review: 3/7/2023

Project Name (County, Route, Section): CUY/MED-Traffic Study PID: 116069

ODOT DISCIPLINE INVOLVEMENT:

February 2022 Page 1 of 17

EXTERNAL AGENCY INVOLVEMENT: