Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Therefore, a conceptual framework will form the theoretical basis for determining
The revised IASB Conceptual Framework was issued in March 2018 and the new areas
included are as follows:
Measurement basis
Presentation and disclosure
Derecognition
Definitions of assets/liabilities
Recognition of assets/liabilities
Measurement uncertainty
Prudence
Stewardship
Substance over form
Investment decisions
Financing decisions
Voting, or influencing management actions
The users will be assessing the management’s stewardship of the entity alongside its
prospects for the future, which will require the following information:
Accrual Accounting
The Conceptual Framework requires financial statements to be prepared using accrual
accounting. That is, the effects of transactions and events are reported in the periods in
which those effects occur, even if the resulting cash receipts and payments occur in a
different period. This is also referred to as the ‘matching’ concept.
This means that it is assumed that the entity has neither the intention nor the need to
liquidate or curtail materially the scale of its operations.
However, if such an intention or need exists, the financial statements may have to be
prepared on a different basis such as the ‘break-up bases’.
Relevance – information that makes a difference to decisions made by users (nature and
materiality)
Faithful information – must faithfully represent the substance of what it represents, and
is therefore complete (helps understand and includes descriptions and explanations),
neutral (no bias, and therefore supported by the exercise of prudence) and free from
error. Measurement uncertainty will impact the level of faithful representation.
A cost constraint applies in ensuing that the information is useful, in that the benefit of
obtaining the information should outweigh the cost of obtaining it.
Is the entity that is required to prepare financial statements and does not necessarily have
to be a legal entity.
Financial statements
Equity: The residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all its liabilities
(Conceptual Framework: para. 4.2).
Income: Increases in assets, or decreases in liabilities, that result in increases in equity,
other than those relating to contributions from equity participants (Conceptual
Framework: para. 4.2).
Expense: Decreases in assets, or increases in liabilities, that result in decreases in equity,
other than those relating to distributions to equity participants (Conceptual Framework:
para. 4.2).
The changes to the definitions of assets and liabilities can be seen below.
The Conceptual Framework defines recognition as ‘the process of capturing for inclusion in
the statement of financial position or the statement(s) of financial performance an item that
meets the definition of one of the elements of financial statements (para. 5.1).
Recognising one element requires the recognition or derecognition of one or more other
elements
Eg:
Recognizing an element
Items are only recognized in the financial statements if they meet the definition of one of
the elements. However, not all items meeting these definitions are recognized.
Elements are recognized if recognition provides users with the useful financial information.
In other words, recognition must provide:
Relevant information
A faithful representation of the asset and liability and resulting income, expense, or
equity movements.
Derecognition
Derecognition normally occurs when the item no longer meets the definition of an element:
For an asset – when control is lost (derecognize part of a recognised asset if control of
that part is lost)
For a liability – when there is no longer a present obligation (Conceptual Framework:
para. 5.26)
Measurement
Current value
Historical cost
Historical cost for an asset is the cost that was incurred when the asset was acquired or
created and, for a liability, is the value of the consideration received when the liability
was incurred
Current value
Current value accounting attempts to address some of the problems of HCA by using
information updated to reflect conditions at the measurement date. Current value
measurement bases include:
Fair value
Value in use for assets
Current cost
Fair value
Fair value: The price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a
liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date
(Conceptual
ACCA Framework: para.
FR Conceptual 6.12 and IFRS 13: Appendix A).
Framework 6 | Page
Fair value is measured in accordance with IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is most commonly calculated by taking the open market value. Where there is
CAP CLASSES 9846791598
Value in use
Value in use: The present value of the cash flows, or other economic benefits, that an entity expects
to derive from the use of an asset and from its ultimate disposal (Conceptual Framework: para. 6.17).
Value in use looks at the likely future value to the entity of using the asset.
Value in use considers entity-specific factors, whereas fair value is market specific
Current cost
Current cost of an asset: The current cost of an asset is the cost of an equivalent asset at
the measurement date, comprising the consideration that would be paid at the
measurement date, plus the transaction costs that would be incurred at that date
(Conceptual Framework: para. 6.21).
Current cost of a liability: The current cost of a liability is the consideration that would be
received for an equivalent liability at the measurement date, minus the transaction costs
that would be incurred at that date (Conceptual Framework: para. 6.21).
Current cost differs from historical cost as current cost assesses the price to purchase at the
reporting date, rather than the date the asset was acquired or liability assumed. Where the
current cost cannot be obtained from information in the market, then the entity can adjust
for condition and age to buy a similar model
Example 1
The IASB’s Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting identifies characteristics which make
financial information faithfully represent what it purports to represent.
Which of the following are examples of those characteristics?
1. Accruals
2. Completeness
3. Going concern
4. Neutrality
Example 2
Which of the following statements describes comparability?
The non-cash effects of transactions should be reflected in the financial statements for the
accounting period in which they occur and not in the period where any cash involved is
received or paid.
Information should be provided to a decision maker in time to be capable of influencing
decisions.
Information must have a predictive and/or confirmatory value.
Similar items within a single set of financial statements should be given similar accounting
treatment
Example 3
In a country where the economy is growing and prices are subject to regular increases, which
of the following are false when using historical cost accounting compared to current value
accounting?
1. Historical cost profits are understated in comparison to current value profits
2. Capital employed which is calculated using historical cost is understated compared to current
value capital employed
3. Historical cost profits are overstated in comparison to current value profits
4. Capital employed which is calculated using historical costs is overstated compared to current
value capital employed
A (1) and (2)
B (1) and (4)
C (2) and (3)
D (2) and (4
Example 4
Ergo Co acquired an item of plant on 1 July 20X5 at a cost of $250,000. Ergo Co depreciates its
plant at a rate of 20% on a reducing balance basis. As at 30 June 20X6, the manufacturer of
the plant still makes the same item of plant and its current price is $300,000.
Required What is the correct carrying amount to be shown in the statement of financial
position of Drexler as at 30 June 20X6 under historical cost and current cost?
Historical cost: $200,000; Current cost: $300,000
Historical cost: $200,000; Current cost: $240,000
Historical cost: $250,000; Current cost: $300,000
Example 5
Which of the following would correctly describe the net realisable value of a two year old
asset?
The original cost of the asset less two years' depreciation
The amount that could be obtained from selling the asset, less any costs of disposal
The cost of an equivalent new asset less two years' depreciation
The present value of the future cash flows obtainable from continuing to use the asset
Example 6
Which TWO of the following are purposes of the IASB's Conceptual Framework?
To assist preparers to develop consistent accounting policies when no Standard applies to a
particular event
To issue rules regarding the accounting treatment of elements in the financial statements
To assist in determining the treatment of items not covered by an existing IFRS
To be authoritative where a specific IFRS conflicts with the Conceptual Framework
SOLUTIONS
EXAMPLE 1
Answer B – For information to faithfully represent the transaction it needs to be complete, free
from bias and neutral.
EXAMPLE 2
Answer D- Similar items within a single set of financial statements should be given similar
accounting treatment.
Using accrual accounting, the effects of transactions should be reflected in the financial
statements for the accounting period in which they occur and not in the period where any cash
involved is received or paid. Information is relevant if it has a predictive and/or confirmatory
value. The second option describes the qualitative characteristics of timeliness.
EXAMPLE 3
Answer B -Historical cost profits are understated in comparison to current value profits.
Capital employed which is calculated using historical costs is overstated compared to the
current value of capital employed
EXAMPLE 4
The correct answer is: Historical cost: $200,000; Current cost: $240,000
Historical cost: $250,000 × 80% = $200,000 carrying amount
Current cost: $300,000 × 80% = $240,000 carrying amount
EXAMPLE 5
ANSWER B- The amount that could be obtained from selling the asset, less any costs of
disposal.
EXAMPLE 6
To assist preparers to develop consistent accounting policies when no Standard applies to a
particular event.
To assist in determining the treatment of items not covered by an existing IFRS.
It is not to be authoritative where a specific IFRS conflicts with the Conceptual Framework as
the Conceptual Framework will be overridden if there is a specific IFRS. Whenever there is a
conflict between an IFRS and the Conceptual Framework, the IFRS takes precedence. Nor is it
to issue rules regarding the accounting treatment of elements in the financial statements, as
the Conceptual Framework is a principles-based format, not a prescriptive, rules-based
approach.