You are on page 1of 42

TECHNICAL COMPENDIUM

PRIMUS
ULTIMATE WHOLE BODY DXA
FOR EVERYONE

Ver. OT-2019-001
Ver. OT-2019-001

Contents
02 OSTEOSYS

MISSION & CORE VALUE


INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS
FULL LINEUP

06 PRIMUS
GENERAL SPEC.
TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL
LOCKING OUT APPLICATION

19 RESEARCH THEME & SALES SEGMENTS

22 SAMPLE REPORT

39 ROOM LAYOUT
02

MISSION & CORE VALUE


INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS
FULL LINEUP
MISSION & CORE VALUE

Passi
on
Tru s t

io n
at
03

ov
Inn

MISSION
Better Products for Better Life

PASSION
Passion is the driving force and one of the prerequisites for achieving our goal.
We try to reach our goal through an efficient cooperation with talented employees
who have the passion and responsibility fortheir mission.

INNOVATION
In order to meet our customer’s satisfaction, we produce more effective and
differentiated product through the innovation which is impetus of the foundation of
company growth together with passion.

TRUST
We operate the company by honest and transparent management which is based
on the trust. OsteoSys strives for creation of win-win corporate culture of good
circulation.
INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS

04
≊Established in 2000
≊Products Installation
≊DXA BMD system : About 6,000 installation base (Dec, 2018)

≊QUS BMD System : About 10,000 installation base (Dec, 2018)

≊70+ employees worldwide (R&D 30)

≊$15 Million of revenue in 2018

≊130 distributors in global market

≊Headquarters in Guro-gu,Seoul, South KOREA

≊Chinese corporation in Shanghai (Established in 2012)

≊www.osteosys.com

History of OsteoSys = History of BMD


20 Years’ Experience of Bone Mineral Densitometry

2018 Launched 3rd Gen. QUS (BeeTLe) and 1st Gen. FPD Animal DXA (iNSiGHT)

2015 Launched 1st Gen. Half body Fan beam DXA

2013 Launched 1st Gen. Whole body DXA (with Body composition& Assessment)

2011 Launched 2nd Gen. pDXA

2009 Awarded Good Design (DEXXUM T)

2008 Launched 2nd Gen. Pencil beam DXA (compact design & fold wing bed Down)

2005 Launched 1st Central DXA (First pencil beam table type DXA)

2004 Launched 2nd Gen. QUS (Waterless probe)

2001 Launched 1st Gen. pDXA (Peripheral Cone Beam DXA)

2000 Established The Company with 1st Gen. QUS


FULL LINEUP

The One and Only Company with Full BMD Lineup


(QUS, DXA)

SONOST SONOST
BeeTLe EXA 3000 EXA Presto DEXXUM T EXCELLUS PRIMUS
2000 3000

QUS ̻ ̻ ̻ 05

Peripheral ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻

Central ̻ ̻

Whole Body ̻

Cone Beam ̻ ̻

Pencil Beam ̻

Fan Beam ̻ ̻

DXA ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻

R&D Center Office Cafeteria Factory Line


06 PRIMUS
GENERAL SPEC.

TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL

LOCKING OUT APPLICATION


07
GENERAL SPEC.

08

Technical specifications
≊Whole body DXA(Total body composition and Assessment)
≊ Narrow fan beam
≊Scan site : Whole body, AP spine, Femur(Dual femur), Foream, Lateral spine, LVA

≊Scan area : 2020 x 580mm / 2020 x 620mm(Optional)

≊Scan time : AP spine - 30Sec.(±2Sec.)

Femur - 25Sec.(±2Sec.)
Forearm - 23Sec. (±2Sec.)
Whole body : 7Min.(Ergonomic) / 11Min.(Standard mode)
* Depends on height
≊Automatic real one-scan

≊Reproducibility : ≤1.0% C.V.

≊Measured parameter : BMD, BMC, BMI, T-score, Z-score, Area, Total body BMD,

Total body Composition(Fat / Lean / BMC), HA(Hip Analysis), Dual femur


≊Total body composition And Various whole body assessment

≊Orthopedics / Pediatrics / FRAX / B-Scope(Body-Scope) / Color mapping / Ergonomic scan /

Trend report / DICOM & PACS


≊
Dimension : 2784 x 1045 x 1258mm(Standard) / 2284 x 1045 x 1258mm(SB)
≊Table height : 650mm

≊Weight : 210kg

≊
Power consumption : 110VAC / 220VAC(+/-10%)
TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL

Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
Type Whole Body DXA (with total body composition)
Method Narrow fast Fan-beam
Principle Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan
APSpine(L1-L4), Femur, Dual Femur, Forearm, Lateral,
Scan Site VFA(LVA, APVA), TotalBody, Infant, Othopedics(Prosthesis Hip),
Prosthesis Knee, Hand, Animal, Study(Free Region)
Scanning Method Rectilinear scan
Reproducibility ⴍ 1.0% CV.
BMD Precision (in vitro & in vivo) < 1.0%
Reference Age (infant : 0-3, pediatric : 4-19, adult : 20 ~ 99)
Clinical Parameters Input age (0-150), Patient weigt supported: 0 ~ 210kg
(Max. patient weight for software : 150kg)
Automatic Calibration Available with daily calibration phantom
Measure Time
Spine 26 sec. (Normal Mode) / 9 sec. (Fast Mode) 09
Femur 17 sec. (Normal Mode) / 15 sec. (Fast Mode)
Forearm 17 sec.
Lateral 41 sec.
LVA(Lateral Vetebral Assessment) 3 min 9 sec. (LVA) / 1 min 44 sec. (APVA)
Whole Body 7 min.(Ergonomic) / 11 min.(Standard mode) *Depends on height
Drive System Stepper motor with reinforced drive belts
Size of X-ray Fileld at Table Top 640mm x 2050mm (scan area)
Shelf Life 10 years

System BMD(g/⽊), BMC(g), T-score, Z-score, Area(⽊), BMI


Body Composition
: FAT(g), LEAN(g), TISSUE(g), BMC(g), Total(g), BMC(%),
FAT(%), BMC(%), LEAN(%)
Regional Body Composition
: Head, Arm(L, R), Trunk(L, R), Leg(L, R), Android, Gynoid
Pediatrics(APSpine, Femur, TotalBody)
HA(Hip Analysis)
Mesureing Information Scoliosis, Kyphosis
AFF
Hand
GDP(Growth, development and prediction of body height in children)
BScope, LScope
FRAX
VAT(Visceral Adipose Tissue)
Color Image View(RCM, BCM, OCM)
Body Map(Scoliosys Cutoff Supported with AWGS, IWGS, EWGS)
Type High Frequency (Monotank)
Voltage 110VAC / 220VAC ± 10%
Frequency 50/60Hz
Number of Phases Single (1)
Lowest Current Time Product 3mAs (0.2mA, 15 sec.)
Required Over-Current Releases 5.2-2.6Amp (5.2 !110v and 2.6 !220v)
Nominal Output 249 W
Output Frequency DC
Rating Value (filament current) 0.2mA ~3.0mA ! 83 kV
kV Range 83 kV
Maximum Tube Voltage 90KV
Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
Maximum Tube Current 3.0 mA
Beam Angle 5˚
mAs Range for Radiography 0.2mAs, 83kv, 0.2mA, 1 sec
X-ray Generator Maximum Power Consumption 423W
Capacity 249W
Aluminum Equivation 2.5mmAL (AL filter + X-ray tube)
Cooling System Immersion in Insulation oil+cooling fans
Tube Type Stationary Anode
Maximum Tube Voltage 120KV
Maximum Tube Current 25mA
Anode Targe Material Tungsten
Anode Heating Curve 250W 27KJ !9min
Input Voltage and Frequency DC83kV
Lowest Current Time Product 1mAs (0.2mA, 5seconds)
Energy Splitting 41kV , 83kV
Samarium Filter 0.25mm (thickness)
Anode Heat Storage Capacity 30,000 J
Maximum anode Heat content 250W
10 Maximum Heating Curve 650W 30kJ !1min
Nominal Anode Input Power 2,000 W (at 0.1s DC)
Aluminum Equivalent 0.5 mmAL
Maximum Useful Volltage 120 kV
X-ray Tube Maximum Filament Current 4A
Nominal Focal Sspot Values
0.5mm x 0.5mm
(x-ray point dimension)
Maximum Symmetrical Radiation Field 60mm x 8mm
Tube Angle 5ⰻ
Focal Spot Size 0.5mm x 0.5mm = 0.25mm^2
Focal Spot to Image Receiptor Distance 662mm
Focal Spot to Pad Surface Distance 200mm (pad surface = table top)
Focal Spot to Table Top Distance 200mm
Focal Spot to Colimator Distance 100mm
Anode Angle 5ⰻ
Anode-Cathode Direction Horizontal
Focal Point Dimension 0.043 = Focal spot 0.5mm x Sin 5ⰻ= 0.5 x 0.0871
Anode Capacity 42kHU
Housing Tube Thermal Capacity 271KHU = 83kV x 3mA x 780sec x 1.4
Tube Cooling Insulation oil
Target Angle 5ⰻ
Type of Collimator/Material 1st : Copper, 2nd: Lead
Collimator Height 48mm
Distance from Collimator to Patient 100mm
Distance from Tube to Patient 200mm
Shutter Minimum Lead 8.07mm(AL : 6 mm, Lead 2mm, Copper 0.07mm)
Shutter Size 30mm x 58mm x 8mm (W x D x H)
X-ray Collimator
Total Filteration 4.3mm Aluminium (Al) 2.5mmAl
Diameter 16.5mm x 4mm
SOD(Source to Object Distance) 200mm
SID(Source to Inspecctor Distance) 662mm
OID(Object to Inspector Distance) 462mm
X-ray Filter Control K-edge filter / Samarium Foil
Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
Type CdTe (Cadmium Telluride) crystals
Lacalization Above the patient
Detector Material CdTe (Cadmium Telluride) crystals
Size 7mm x 3mm
0.5 mm / pixel ~ 1 mm / pixel (depending on measuring site)
forearm 1.19mm / pixel
spine 1.62mm / pixel
femur 1.62mm / pixel
Detector Resolution
totalbody 51.83 mm / pixel
lateral 2.12mm / pixel
LVA 2.12 mm / pixel
APVA 2.12mm / pixel
Accuracy of Alignment With in 1.0mm
Detector Pixel Pitch 3.1mm
Pixel Size 900um x 2100um
Number of Channel 16 Incividual Channel
Table Top MDF, Reja skin
Dimension (W x D x H) 2784mm x 1040mm x 1250mm
Patient weigt supported: 0 ~ 210kg
Patient Weight Capacity
(Max. patient weight for software : 150kg)
Table Height 64cm
Scanner Table Laser Positioning System Cross Red Laser Pointer
Aluminium Equivalent for X-ray
11
ⴍ 2.0mm AL
Absorbsiometry for Table
Free Distance between the Arm and
440mm
Table (for lateral scan)
Compact Table Available (2284mm x 1040mm x 1250mm: Short Body)
Manufacturer SAMSUNG/HP
CPU ⴎ Intel Pentium Gold G5400 3.7 2400MHz 2C 54W CPU
AM ⴎ 4 GB
HDD ⴎ 500GB
Monitor ⴎ 1366 x 768
Workstation (PC) CD ROM CD / DVD R/W drive
Communicaiton Ethernet TCP/IP
Graphic Intel HD Graphics Shared
OS ⴎ Windows 7
POWER 110 ~ 240 VAC , 50 / 60 Hz
Skin Enterance Dose indication Available (uGy and uSv)
AP Spine : ⴍ7.52 uGy
Femur : ⴍ8.28 uGy
Patient Radiation Dose
Forearm : ⴍ2.06 uGy
Safety Total Body : ⴍ0.55 uGy
HIP < 0.341uSv (1mA)
Leakage Radiation Dose Dual Femur < 0.682uSv (1mA)
Spine < 0.341uSv (1mA)
Forearm < 0.173uSv (0.2mA)
Accessory Positioning Supporters Lateral Positioner, Lateral Positioner Cushion, Foot Guide
Daily QC Phantom is offered as
QC Available
acceesory
Humidity 30% ~ 75%
External Shielding Not Required
Temperature 10Ⳅ~40Ⳅ
Storage Temperature 5Ⳅ~50Ⳅ
Environmental Power Consumption 700VA
Requirement Input Power 110VAC / 220VAC +/- 10%
Shock and Vibration 700 ~ 1060hPa

Emergency function
(key or button on the control console to
Available initiate stop scanning)
Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
AP spine Measurement and Analysis Available
Femur Measurement and Analysis Available
Orthopedics Knee Measurement and
Available
Analysis
Othopedics(Prosthesis Hip)
Available
Measurement and Analysis
Total Body Measurement and Analysis Available
Regional Body Measurement and
Available
Analysis
Forearm Measurement and Analysis Available
Lateral Spine Measurement and Analysis Available
VFA(LVA, DVA) Measurement and
Available
Analysis
Whole Body Composition Available
VAT(Visceral Adipose Tissue) Available
Infant Measurement and Analysis Available
Digital Vertebral Assessment Available
Study Mode Available
Vertebral Assessment (L4-T4) Available
Pediatrics Available
AFF Available
Hand Available
Hip Analysis Available
Morphometric Tools for Femur Available (Hip Axis Length : HAL, Hip Angle : HA)
Scoliosis Available
Kyphosis Available
12 Colour Mapping Available
Trend Analysis
Available
(BMD, Body Composition, Scan Image)
B-Scope (Body Scope) Available
FRAX Available
Ergonomic Scan Available
Zone of Interest Available
Auto ROI Available
Angle ROI (Manual) Available
Angle Adjustment Available
Programs (S/W) Brush Function Available
Edge Auto Detection Available
Implant Auto Detection Available
Automatic Real One-Scan Available
Re-Scan Available
Dual Energy Image Inspection
Available
(Low Energy & High Energy)
Compare Function Available
Archive System Available
Data Back Up & Restore Available (With GE Data Only)
Ver1 : Mideast, Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, Italian, Chinese,
Australia, Korean, Sapin, European, USA_White, USA_Asian,
USA_Hispanic, USA_Black, NHANES_Asian, NHANES_Black,
NHANES_Hispanic, NHANES_White, Turkey_Asian, Turkey_Black,
Reference Population
Turkey_Hispanic, Turkey_White
Ver 2 : Asia, Australia, Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Finland,
Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Middle East,
Philippine, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, USA, USA(NHANES), UK
Supported with LVA(Lateral Vertebral Assessment), Scoliosis,
Advanced Morphometric Tools
Kyphosis
Body Composition Available (BMI, Android / Gynoid Ratio)
Detecting Function for Atypical Femoral
Available
Fracture(AFF)
Exclusion of Non-Bone Region from
Available
calculation (metal, calcification, etc.)
Orthopedics with Peri-Prosthetic Bone
Available (Orthopedics, Prosthesis Hip, Prosthesis Knee)
Density Analysis (hip prosthesis).
Spine Geometry Available (Scoliosis, Kyphosis)
Patient's trend/curve comparison process:
short-term change, long-term change, Available
change expressed in% and% per year.
Detailed colour print out of reports Available
Calcic Mass Available (BMC Available)
Exposure Audio & Visual indication Available
Automatic metal detection Available
Automated WHO Background
Available
evaluation
Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
Multimedia Online Help Available (remote control service)
Superior Fracture Risk
Available (APVA)
Assessment (VFA)
Hand for Monitoring Rheumatoid
Available (study mode for imaging diagnosis purpose)
Arthritis
Multiple Patient Directories Available
Data Correction available
Database Conversion Available
Management Tool Available
Importatoin of Previous Exam for
Available
Individual Patient
Importation of Entire Database Available
Combined Report & Scan Protocols Available
Automated QA Trending Available
Programs (S/W) Analysis for Customized Region Of
Available
Interest
Pediatric Spine, Femur, Total Body
Available
Measurement
Small Animal Totalbody Measurement
Available
and Analysis
Automatic Metal Detection Available
Image Preview Available
Comparability of Examination Available
Automatic Mean Cortical Thickness Available (manual function)
Femoral Neck Band Available (Medial, Lateral)
Subtrochannic Band Available (Medial, Lateral) 13
Trochanter Band Available (Medial, Lateral)
Chinese, English, French, Germany, Italian, Kazahstan, Korean,
Multi-language
Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Thai, Turkish, Vietnam
AP Spine 160mm x 189mm
Fermur 120mm x 147mm
Total body 580mm x 1995mm
Forearm 100mm x 144mm
Lateral Spine 140mm x 216mm
Infant 160mm x 160mm
Study 160mm x 160mm
Orthopedics 120mm x 224mm
VFA(LVA, DVA) 240mm x 420mm
Scan Area Forearm UD(Ultradistal), MID(mid-distal), 33%(1/3) Point
Hip Neck, Wards, Troch, Shaft(intertrochanter), Total
Dual Scan: Combined examination of
Available
the left and right hip
One Scan: Combined examination of the
Available
lumbar spine and of the left and right hip.
Total and Local (Head, Spine, left Rib, left Arm, left Leg, left Total,
Whole Body Scan
right Rib, right Arm, right Leg, right Total, Peivis)
Lateral Spine BMD Available
Available
Pediatrics BMD and Z-score for AP spine and Femur, Whole Body
Composition
Modality Worklist Available
DICOM 3.0 Storage Class Available
DICOM 3.0 Worklist Available
DICOM 3.0 Image Format in DICOM, JPEG and TIFF Available
Send(Storage) Available
Cross calibration between the new
Available
system and the existing system
Regirstration CE, CFDA, ANVISA, ISO13485 : 2016, ISO9001 : 2015
Medical Devices Registration Must submit ISO 13485 : 2003 / AC : 2007
IEC60601-1 : 2005(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1 :
General requirements for basic safety and essential performance)
IEC60601-1-2 : 2007(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2 :
General requirements for safety - Collateral Standard:
Certificate Electromagnetic compatibility)
General Requirements of Safety for IEC60601-1-3 : 2008(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-3 :
Electromagnetic Compatibility General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: General
requirements for radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray
equipment)
IEC60601-2-28:2010(Medical electrical equipment - Part 2 :
Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray source assemblies
and X-ray tube assemblies for medical diagnosis)
LOCKING OUT APPLICATION

Locking Out Application #1 : Color Mapping Mode (RCM, BCM, OCM)

BCM

Absolute bone quality color mapping mode.


The reference data(T-score) for a site is divided into
6 classes and each class is represented by each color.
BCM offers pixel by pixel absolute bone quality
status of ROI.

14

RCM

Relative bone quality color mapping mode.


The min. and max. BMD values of a patient is divided
into 6 classes for a site and each class is represented
by each color. RCM offers pixel by pixel relative bone
quality status of ROI.

OCM

Osteoporotic color mapping mode. OCM offers a


direct imaging diagnosis for each vertebrae
(L1, L2, L3, L4)’s osteoporotic status.
Locking Out Application #2 : L (Line)-Scope

L-Scope is OsteoSys’ revolutionary function to offer imaging


analysis of body composition(bone, lean, fat) on arm or leg based
on tomographic technology.

L-Scope is the optimal solution for post-op treatment of


reconstruction surgery after amputation and for diagnosis and
treatment of Lymph-edema.

15
BMD analysis by L-Scope

Fat(g) analysis by L-Scope

Lean(g) analysis by L-Scope


Locking Out Application #3 : B (Body)-Scope

B-Scope is OsteoSys’ revolutionary function to offer micro analysis of body


composition(bone, lean, fat) for any ROI you choose.

B-Scope is the optimal solution for post-op treatment of liposuction surgery, diagnosis /
treatment of Lymph-edema and sarcopenia.

16
Locking Out Application #4 : FIM(Fat In Muscle)

FIM(Fat in Muscle) is a special tool for diagnosis of Sarcopenia.


Three major standards for diagnosis of Sarcopenia are muscle mass, strength,
physical performance.
Many studies prove that muscle quality should be seriously considered
for better diagnosis. Even if you have same muscle mass, the quality of
muscle decrease according to the amount of fat mass in muscle.
FIM function is OsteoSys’ exclusive application to assess muscle quality.

17

Agea 25 Age 63
Locking Out Application #5 : Animal Mode

Spine Scan

Cyno

18

Femur Scan

Marmoset Femur(L) Femur(R)

Cyno Femur(L) Femur(R)


RESEARCH 19

THEME &
SALES
SEGMENTS
Overview of the Main Field of Suggestion for clinical research area
Clinical Applications of with Primus
Whole Body DXA in Adults


Obesity Model Application / Function Possible Research Theme
Nutritional disorders ●
Overweight

Anorexia nervosa The relationship between
BMD, Body Composition bone mineral density and

Chrohn’s disease Analysis(Lean Mass) body composition with
Gastrointestinal disorders ●
Celiac disease vertebral fragility fractures.

Gastrectomy
Body Composition Analysis Sarcopenia and frailty

Cirrhosis (Lean Mass) guidelines update.
Hepatobiliary disorders ●
Gallstones
The relationship between

Chronic renal failure t-cell responses to
Renal disorders ●
Hemodialysis Body Composition Analysis cytomegalovirus(cmv) and
Transplantation (Lean Mass) onset of frailty in hiv- and
Primus

hiv+ men in the multicenter



Hypopituitarism aids cohort study.
Endocrinological disorders ●
Acromegal

Cushing’s syndromey The effects a multimodal
intervention in older frail /
Body Composition Analysis
Osteoporosis pre-frail people with diabetes
20

(Lean Mass)
Bone disorders ●
Paget’s disease mellitus from a functional

Osteopetrosis perspective.

COPD Phase 1 Clinical Trial for


Body Composition Analysis Anti-Sarcopenia /

Pulmonary diseases ●
Fibrosis cystic for animal(Bone Mass, Anti-Osteoporosis/
Fat Mass, Lean Mass) Anti-Obesity Medication.

Corticosteroids
Drugs and substances ●
Hormones

Parenteral nutrition


Diabetes

AIDS

Sympathetic dystrophy
syndrome
Other disorders ●
Amiotrophic lateral
sclerosis

Tetraplegy

Duchenne muscular
dystrophy
No. Sales Segment Sub-1 Sub-2 Etc.
1 Government Tender
2 Hospitals Drug & Pharmcietucal &
3 University Hospital Nutrition Compani
4 Clinic Center
Aventis (Actonel)
5 Multi-modality Center Asta Medica
Radiology Astra Draco
Banyu/Teijin Pharmaceutical
Rehabilitation Baker Norton
Orthopedics Berlex Laboratories
Boenringe
Endoscopy
Bristol-Myers Squibb
6 Diagnosis Center Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Care International
Ob/Gyn Chugai
CEPA
Internal Medicine Chinoin
DIC(Disseminated Intravascular Chugai Pharmaceutical
Coagulopathy) Elan (HSRI)
E. Tosse
Bisphosphonate manufactures Alendronate
Eisai
Risedronate Eli Lilly (Evista)
Ibandronate Ferrer
Genentech
HRT manufactures
7 Pharmaceutical Market Glaxo Pharmaceuticals
SERM/Raloxifene manufactures Hoechst Roussel
Calcitonin manufactures ICN-Iberica
ISS Corporation 21
Parathyroid hormone manufactures Kissei, Sankyo
Denosumab manufactures Kureha/Sankyo
Kissei Pharmaceutical
Calcium
Leiras
8 Nutrition Manufactures Vitamin D Marion Merrell Dow, Inc.
Mineral Mead Johnson
Meiji Confectionary
Calcium Milk Milo calcium milk Merck Sharp & Dohme
9 Milk Industries Vitamin D Milk Miles Laboratories
Baby Milk Powder MSD (Fosamax)
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
10 Distribution Enterprise Amway Novartis (Estraderm,
11 Drug Stores Calcitonines)
Novo Nordisk
Test lab
12 Laboratories Organon (oestrogens, Livial)
Food industries Organon
All kind of Education Center Pfizer
13 Education & Research institute Pfizer Labs
R&D department Parke-Davis
14 Health Services Procter & Gamble (Didronel)
Roche (Didronel)
15 Elderly Facility
Roger Bellon
16 Nursing Home Rh?ne Poulenc Rorer
17 Sportsman care Center Body care Center Schering-Plough
Schering A.G.
18 Acute care Center Serono Laboratories
19 Long term care Center Shire
20 Family Practitioner GP SmithKline Beecham
Solvay Pharmaceuticals
Golf Sterling Winthrop
Luxury Spa Sankyo
21 VVIP service & treatment Sumitomo
Fines center
Syntex Laboratories
(Body measurement service)
Sanofi Winthrop
International Relief KOICA Schering (oestrogens)
22 Servier
Organization JAICA
Takeda Pharmaceutical
Banking and Mutual Funds TAP Pharmaceuticals
23 Funds
Any Leasing Teijin
TEVA
Railways Service
UpjohnWyeth Ayerst
24 Transport station Road Transport Service Yamanouchi
Airport sevice Zeneca
25 Etc. Etc. Etc.
22
SAMPLE
REPORT
01. Spine

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors

[ ] I have a previous fracture history

Spine [ ] Parents have a hip fracture history

Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/


༆) BMC (g) Area (༆) [ ] Currently I am smoking

L1-L4 -1.3 -1.3 1.032 62.39 60.48


[ ] Currently in use of steroid medication

[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis

[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis

[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day

[ ] There is previously measured BMD value of femur

Analysis of Lumber spine


Region BMD (g/ ⽊ ) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊) Regional density value curve(g/c⽋)

L1 0.878 -2.2(78%) -2.2(78%) 13.11 14.93 1.70


L2 1.030 -1.5(86%) -1.5(86%) 15.37 14.91 L1
1.48
L3 1.098 -0.9(91%) -0.9(91%) 16.18 14.74 23
L2 1.26
L4 1.116 -0.7(93%) -0.7(93%) 17.73 15.89

L1-L2 0.954 -1.8(82%) -1.8(82%) 28.48 29.84 1.04


L3
L1-L3 1.002 -1.5(85%) -1.5(85%) 44.65 44.58 0.82

L1-L4 1.032 -1.3(87%) -1.3(87%) 62.39 60.48 L4 0.60


L2-L3 1.064 -1.2(88%) -1.2(88%) 31.55 29.65
0.38
L2-L4 1.082 -1.0(90%) -1.0(90%) 49.28 45.55 L1 L2 L3 L4

L3-L4 1.107 -0.8(92%) -0.8(92%) 33.91 30.63 Image not for diagnosis Reference curve Region of Interest

T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture


BMD (g/⽊) Reference : L1-L4 T-Score Relative comparision with same age group
1.42 2 This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10
years of the risk factor check list.
1.30 1 Good Standard Bad

1.18 0 86% *When BMD value of Femur is input


Normal Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
1.07 -1
Display current bone status of examinee Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.95 -2
Osteopenia When BMD value of Femur is not input
0.83 -3 Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.71 -4 Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.60 -5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Me
Age(years)
Index of treatment boundary
45
Follow up examnination
40
165.0 Comparision between current and
Height (cm)
previous BMD value 35

55.0 3.00 30
Weight (kg)
25
20 Fracture
over 20% Treatment
BMI (kg/༇) probability %
20
0.33
1.032 15
BMD (g/c༇)
10
-1.3
T-Score -2.33
5 over 3% Treatment

-1.3
Z-Score 0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
-5.00 Age
Hip Main part
ScanDate 17.08.23 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS


Radiation dose > 7.52μGy
02. Femur(Dual)

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors

[ ] I have a previous fracture history


Right Femur
[ ] Parents have a hip fracture history
Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/ ⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)
[ ] Currently I am smoking
Neck 1.1 1.6 1.206 7.71 6.40
Total 1.0 1.3 1.146 31.08 27.13 [ ] Currently in use of steroid medication

[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis


Left Femur
[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis
Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/ ⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)
[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day
Neck -1.2 -0.7 0.893 5.80 6.49
Total -0.2 0.0 0.988 39.09 39.57 [̻] There is previously measured BMD value of femur

Analysis of both sides Femur

24

R ight Femur Image not for diagnosis Image not for diagnosis Left F emur

T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture


Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score
BMD (g/cm2) Reference : Neck T-Score
1.33 2 Neck Right 1.206 1.1(114%) 1.6(122%) This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10
years of the risk factor check list.

1.20 1 Neck Left 0.893 -1.2(84%) -0.7(90%)


Right Femur
Neck Mean 1.050 -0.1(99%) 0.4(106%)
1.06 0 *When BMD value of Femur is input
Normal Neck Diff. 0.313 Under... Under... Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
0.93 -1
Total Right 1.146 1.0(113%) 1.3(116%) Probability of Hip Fracture -
Left Femur
0.79 Osteopenia -2
Total Left 0.988 -0.2(97%) 0.0(100%) When BMD value of Femur is not input
0.65 -3 Total Mean 1.067 0.4(105%) 0.7(108%) Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.52 -4 Total Diff. 0.158 Under... -6.7(16%)
Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.38 -5

Index of treatment boundary


45
Follow up examnination
40
Right Femur Left Femur
35
165.0 165.0 165.0
Height (cm) Height (cm) 30

55.0 55.0 55.0 25


Weight (kg) Weight (kg) Fracture
probability % over 20% Treatment
20
20 20 20
BMI (kg/⽋) BMI (kg/⽋) 15

1.236
1.206 10
BMD (g/c⽋) BMD (g/c⽋) 0.893
over 3% Treatment
2.2 5
2.0
T-Score T-Score -0.4 0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
2.5
2.3 Age
Z-Score Z-Score -0.1 Hip Main part

ScanDate 17.08.23 ScanDate 17.08.23 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo
Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS
03. Lateral Spine

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

LTSpine
PM_L-TS-pi
BMD (g/⽊) Reference : L2-L3 T-Score
1.04 Over 4

0.93 3

0.82 2

0.71 1

0.60 0
L2
Normal
0.49 -1

0.38
Osteopenia
-2 25
0.27 -3

0.17 -4
L3 0.06
Osteoporosis
-5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g Area ( ⽊)

L4 L2 1.084 4.4 (180%) 4.4 (180%) 11.68 10.77

L3 0.965 3.3 (161%) 3.3 (161%) 6.67 6.91

L4 0.814 1.4 (123%) 1.4 (123%) 6.29 7.72

L2-L3 1.038 4.0 (173%) 4.0 (173%) 18.34 17.68

L2-L4 0.970 - - 24.63 25.40

L3-L4 0.885 2.4 (141%) 2.4 (141%) 12.95 14.63


Image not for diagnosis

Comment

ASIAN, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
04. Forearm

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors

[ ] I have a previous fracture history

Left Forearm [ ] Parents have a hip fracture history

Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/


༆) BMC (g) Area (༆) [ ] Currently I am smoking

Radius Total 1.4 1.4 0.617 2.61 4.23


[ ] Currently in use of steroid medication

[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis

[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis

[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day

[ ] There is previously measured BMD value of femur

Analysis of Forearm
Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊)
Ulna UD Radius UD BMD comparision between UD and 33%
Radius UD 0.449 2.1(119%) 2.1(119%) 1.10 2.45

Ulna UD 0.438 - - 0.12 0.27

26 Radius 33% 0.850 2.0(119%) 2.0(119%) 1.51 1.77

Ulna 33% 0.783 - - 1.39 1.77 Ulna 33% Radius 33%


Radius 33%+Ulna 33% : 1.6

Both UD 0.448 - - - -

Both 33% 0.816 - - - -


Radius UD+Ulna UD : 0.9
Radius Total 0.617 1.4(112%) 1.4(112%) 2.61 4.23

Ulna Total 0.737 - - 1.51 2.05

Both Total 0.656 - - - -

Image not for diagnosis

T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture


BMD (g/⽊ Reference : Radius Total T-Score Relative comparision with same age group
0.64 2 This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10
years of the risk factor check list.
0.60 1 Good Standard Bad

0.55 0 21% *When BMD value of Femur is input


Normal Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
0.50 -1
Display current bone status of examinee Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.46 -2
Osteopenia When BMD value of Femur is not input
0.41 -3 Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.36 -4 Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.31 -5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Me
Age(years)
Index of treatment boundary
45
Follow up examnination
40
165.0 Comparision between current and
Height (cm)
previous BMD value 35

55.0 3.00 30
Weight (kg)
25
20 Fracture
over 20% Treatment
BMI (kg/༇) probability %
20
0.33
0.617 15
BMD (g/c༇)
10
1.4
T-Score -2.33
5 over 3% Treatment

1.4
Z-Score 0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
-5.00 Age
Hip Main part
ScanDate 17.08.23 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS


Radiation dose > 2.06μGy
05. LVA

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity...............NHANES_WHITE
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

LVA
PM_L-VA-2.
Cobb Angle Region : T5-L1 Angle : 28.57
Region Posterior Middle Anterior
T4 2.602 1.835 1.675
T5 1.979 2.432 1.979
T4
T6 2.138 2.432 1.827
T5
T5 T7 3.249 2.592 1.672
T6 T8 2.595 2.738 2.595
T9 2.952 2.562 3.145
T7 T10 2.916 2.679 2.562 27
T8 T11 2.991 2.672 2.632
T12 3.531 3.131 2.493
T9
L1 3.093 3.556 2.535
T10 L2 3.638 3.785 3.033
T11 L3 3.833 3.716 3.865
L4 3.654 3.670 3.848
T12
Region Mean Ht.(cm) M/P Ratio(%) A/P Ratio(%)
L1 L1 T4 2.037 70.537 64.385
T5 2.130 122.917 100.000
L2
T6 2.132 113.778 85.463
T7 2.504 79.782 51.468
L3 T8 2.643 105.508 100.000
T9 2.886 86.796 106.547
L4 T10 2.719 91.853 87.858
T11 2.765 89.348 88.006
T12 3.052 88.653 70.582
L1 3.061 114.953 81.949
L2 3.485 104.021 83.366
L3 3.805 96.928 100.824
Image not for diagnosis L4 3.724 100.455 105.314

Comment

NHANES_WHITE, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
06. Orthopedic

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity...............NHANES_WHITE
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

Left Orthopedic
PM_L-Or-th

1.581 Zone1 BMD

1.461

1 1.341
2017-08-23
7 1.221

1.101
28
2 0.981
6
0.861

5 3
Region BMD (g/⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)

Zone1 1.323 4.79 3.6

4 Zone2 1.597 3.67 2.3

Zone3 1.083 5.13 4.7

Zone4 1.084 5.25 4.8

Zone5 1.354 3.56 2.6

Zone6 1.133 4.89 4.3

Zone7 0.939 5.92 6.3

OuterTotal 1.275 13.59 10.7

InnerTotal 1.085 14.36 13.2


Image not for diagnosis

Comment

NHANES_WHITE, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
07-1. Total Body

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender......................................Male
Height................................180.0 cm Weight................................120.0 k g
Fragility Fractures........................No

TotalBody
PM_T-B_-VA

BMD (g/༆) Reference : Total T-Score


1.50 Over 4
1.42 3
1.34 2
1.26 1
1.18 0
1.10
Normal
-1 29
1.02 Osteopenia -2
0.94 -3
0.86 -4
Osteoporosis
0.78 -5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Region BMD (g/⽊ ) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊)


Head 2.215 - - 637.46 287.84
Spine 1.990 - - 552.78 277.83
L-Rib 1.150 - - 330.12 286.97
L-Arm 1.114 - - 96.56 86.66
L-Leg 1.437 - - 590.77 411.08
L-Total 1.539 - - 1915.05 1244.56
R-Rib 1.118 - - 310.25 277.39
R-Arm 1.177 - - 82.02 69.67
R-Leg 1.433 - - 592.91 413.69
R-Total 1.542 - - 1882.78 1220.61
Pelvis 1.705 - - 604.96 354.90
Total 1.540 4.5 (131%) 4.6 (132%) 3797.83 2466.03

Image not for diagnosis

Comment

ASIAN, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5

Radiation dose > 0.55μGy


07-2. Total Body

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender......................................Male
Height................................180.0 cm Weight................................120.0 k g
Fragility Fractures........................No

TotalBody
PM_T-B_-VA
BMI

Under Weight Normal Over Weight Obese - 1 Obese - 2

1 2 3 4 5
5

30 18.5 25.0 30.0 35.0

Total Body BMI : 37.0

VAT Area ( ⽊) = 372 / VAT Volume (໼ ) = 2010 / VAT Mass (g) = 1849
VAT (%) = 34 / SAT (%) = 26

Region Fat (g) Lean (g) TISSUE (g) BMC (g) Total (g) BMC(%) TissueFAT(%) TotalFAT(%)
Head 2277 4383 6660 637 7298 8.7 34.2 31.2
L-Arm 1705 1795 3500 97 3596 2.7 48.7 47.4
L-Trunk 14758 14911 29669 909 30578 3.0 49.7 48.3
L-Leg 9385 11175 20560 591 21151 2.8 45.6 44.4
L-Total 26987 30073 57059 1915 58974 3.2 47.3 45.8
R-Arm 1520 1607 3128 82 3210 2.6 48.6 47.4
R-Trunk 14412 14445 28857 889 29746 3.0 49.9 48.4
R-Leg 9624 11118 20742 593 21335 2.8 46.4 45.1
R-Total 26695 29362 56057 1883 57940 3.2 47.6 46.1
Total 53682 59435 113116 3798 116914 3.2 47.5 45.9
Android 5891 3891 9782 138 9920 1.4 60.2 59.4
Gynoid 8636 8501 17137 373 17510 2.1 50.4 49.3

Image not for diagnosis

Comment

ASIAN, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
07-3. Total Body

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 180.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Male Weight 120.0 kg

Ethnicity ASIAN Date Measured 2017-08-23

Total Body Site Analysis


1. Total Body Scan Image 2. Total Body Composition (kg)
Value Soft Tissue Body Weight

Total Lean Mass 59.4


113.1
Total Fat Mass 53.7 116.9

Total Bone Mass 3.8

3. Body Fat Analysis


PBF(F/W)*100 47.5
VAT Mass (g) 1849
VAT Volume ( ໼ ) 2010
VAT Area (༆) 372
VAT (%) / SAT (%) 34 / 26

31
4. Body Lean Analysis
Lean Body Mass 59.4

APPen Lean/Height^2 7.9

APPen Lean/Weight 0.2

APPen Lean/BMI 0.7

5. BMI
BMI : 37.0%
Under Weight Normal Over Weight Obese - 1 Obese - 2

1 2 3 4 5

18.5 25.0 30.0 35.0


Image not for diagnosis

6. Body Map 7. Trend


Obesity
Appen.LM Lean(g) 25694.7

Appen.LM Fat(g) 22234.6

A/G Ratio 0.5


BF
(25%) Weight changes 116.9

ScanDate 17.08.23

BF : Body Fat
A : AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia
I : IWGS, International Working Group for Sarcopenia
E : EWGS, European Working Group for Sarcopenia
Normal A I E Muscle weekness

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS


Radiation dose > 0.55μGy
08. Study

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

Study
PM_S-tu-dy 1.620 Zone 1 BMD

1.500

1.380

2017-08-23
1.260

1.140
32 Z1 Z7
1.020

0.900
Z2 Z6

Z3 Z5
Region BMD(g/⽊) BMC(g) Area(⽊) Fat(g) Lean(g) Total(g) FAT(%)

Zone 1 1.260 4.926 3.910 23.407 114.732 143.064 16.806


Z4
Zone 2 0.998 0.473 0.474 37.150 182.898 220.521 16.721

Zone 3 - - - 44.234 182.823 227.057 19.353

Zone 4 2.357 23.690 10.050 71.199 322.452 417.341 18.177

Zone 5 2.167 20.625 9.519 17.388 83.287 121.300 17.339

Zone 6 1.637 19.659 12.013 17.192 71.464 108.316 19.502


Image not for diagnosis
Zone 7 0.929 5.877 6.323 35.518 37.806 79.201 49.675

Comment
09. FIM Study

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

FIM Study
PM_F-IM-_F 2.378 Zone 1 BMD

2.258

2.138

2017-08-23
2.018

1.898
33
1.778

1.658

Z1
Region BMD(g/⽊) BMC(g) Area(⽊) Fat(g) Lean(g) Total(g) FAT(%)

Zone 1 2.018 28.340 14.045 857.405 1117.860 2003.604 46.777

Zone 2 - - - - - - -

Z3 Zone 3 1.742 26.120 14.992 548.026 827.026 1401.173 43.203

Zone 4 - - - - - - -

Zone 5 - - - - - - -

Zone 6 - - - - - - -
Image not for diagnosis
Zone 7 - - - - - - -

Comment
10. APVA

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

APVA
PM_A-PV-A.
Cobb Angle Region : T4-T7 Angle : 11.60

T4 T4
T5

34 T7
T7

Image not for diagnosis

Comment

ASIAN, Reference Population.


According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
11. Infant Total body

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity................................WHITE
BirthDate...............2017-06-06 (1.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height..................................76.0 cm Weight..................................10.2 kg
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

Infant TotalBody
PM_I-nf-an Head BMD

35

Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊)


Head - - - - -
Spine 0.378 - - 9.29 24.56
L-Rib 0.023 - - 0.01 0.34
L-Arm - - - - -
L-Leg 1.426 - - 8.50 5.96
L-Trunk 0.356 - - 4.79 13.46
L-Total 1.185 - - 29.17 24.61
R-Rib - - - - -
R-Arm - - - - -
R-Leg 1.406 - - 3.48 2.48
R-Trunk 0.392 - - 4.50 11.48
R-Total 1.141 - - 28.08 24.61
Image not for diagnosis

Comment

.
12. Knee

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity................................WHITE
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................65.0 k g
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

Knee
PM_K-ne-e. 1.247 Zone 1 BMD

1.127

1.007

2017-08-23
0.887

0.767
36
Z3 Z5 0.647

0.527
Z1 Z2

Region BMD (g/⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)


Z4
Zone 1 0.887 4.391 4.953

Zone 2 1.349 6.324 4.688


Z6 Z7
Zone 3 0.657 4.299 6.548

Zone 4 0.739 8.037 10.881

Zone 5 1.499 10.292 6.866

Zone 6 0.615 2.784 4.527


Image not for diagnosis
Zone 7 0.598 4.159 6.958

Comment

.
13. VAT

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1966-06-06 (52.5) Height 166.0 cm
Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 66.0 kg
Ethnicity TURKEY_WHITE Date Measured2017-08-23

VAT Analysis
1. VAT(Visceral Adiopose Tissue) / Visceral Fat
VAT Scan estimates the VAT (Visceral Adipose Tissue)
content within the android region, VAT is a specific type
of fat that is associated with several types of metabolic
diseases such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type
2 diabetes. CoreScan results have been validated for
adults between ages 18-90, and with a BMI in the range
of 18.5-40

Visceral Fat(VAT)

2. Body Fat Analysis


PBF(F/W)*100 47.1
VAT Mass (g) 1541
VAT Volume ( ⽎ ) 1675 37
Approx. VAT Area (༆) 310
VAT (%) / SAT (%) 29 / 31

Subcutaneous Fat 3. VAT Trend History


PBF(F/W)*100 47.1

VAT Mass (g) 1541.4

VAT Volume (⽎) 1675.5

Approx.VAT Area(⽊) 309.9

ScanDate 17.08.23

4. Trend
Appen Lean Mass(g) 29404.8

Appen Fat Mass(g) 30770.6

A/G Ratio 0.5

Weight changes 118.6

ScanDate 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


Operating department
Osteosys
Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Demo

Version: 1.2.0 MN: 120.11.10 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS


14. AFF

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 65.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Analysis of AFF
1. AFF(Atypical Femoral Fracture) 2. AFF Location & Width(mm)

Region Location (mm) Width (mm)


Line 1 303 7.9
Line 2 326 7.8
38 Line 3 155 6.7
Line 4 230 6.6
Line 5 172 7.2
Line 6 209 6.9
Line 7 256 6.9

3. Width Trend (Max)

Width (mm) 7.92

ScanDate 17-08-23

Image not for diagnosis

4. Trend

Doctor's comment Doctor's information


. Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

NHANES(2005-2008), Reference Population / Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS


ROOM 39

LAYOUT
Room Layout for DXA Installation

PRIMUS

40
3000

2790

150 1050 1000


3000
CONTACT INFO

SEOUL OFFICE
Address: 9F, 903 JNK DIGITAL TOWER, 111 DIGITAL-RO 26, GURO-GU, SEOUL, KOREA
Phone : +82 2 6124 5900
E-mail : info@osteosys.com
Homepage : www.osteosys.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/worldtopbmd/

You might also like