Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
2022, Vol. 6, No. 2, 233 – 240
1
Research scholar, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies,Faridabad, India
2
Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, India
ABSTRACT
Behind of many problems in an employee’s life, there is almost one reason that is stress. Stress is
defined by a number of authors in their language. Stress at work place is an attention seeker
phenomenon in this modern word. It’s not just a word but a feeling which affect an individual
physically, psychologically, emotionally and behaviorally. Job stress is affected by three different
concepts which are, stressors, stress reaction, stress post-effect. Stress post-effect includes positive
stress (eustress) and negative stress (distress). These both play different role in the concept of stress.
Stress aspects that make an employee experience stress such as new project, targets, deadlines, new
opportunity, extra working hours, employer’s expectations, interpersonal relationship, colleagues’
disputes etc are stressors. In an organization, various initiatives are taken and the strategies are
constructed by the employees and employer to overcome this inevitable problem and make the
employee comfortable and more efficient. The HRM plays an important role in this. The study
focuses on the measures and keys to overcome stress with the role of HRM.
Keywords: work stress, stressors, post effects, Eustress, Distress, HRM
remain just a word or feeling but serious depression etc. even it may be reason of suicide
problem, issues, disease like cancer, ulcer,
Fig. 1
Source: Martin 2018
If we talk about stress levels there are a employees’ productivity. Some organizations
number of studies which discussed about it are not place adequately in quantitative
such as: The study is conducted by Ritu (2013) environment but there is always an effort to
to compare the manager’s stress level in both increase the productivity so as to get maximize
private and public banking sector. For the study the company, there are companies which
data is collected from 300 bank employees with provide sensitivity to the employees but still
the different factors such as age, gender and there productivity is reasonable depends upon
role. The study also focused on stress related human resource management and inter
problem issues and stress symptoms. The study relationship between the employee and
revealed that among the 300 employees more employer. It has been also observed that the
than 150 employees suffered medium to high employees are given perverse atmosphere to
level stress. In the study of Datt, Dr., Punam work for the employer but does not bother
and Washington, Dr., Anthea (2015) impact about the impact on health of the persons as
of stress on work performance and career well as his responsibilities outside the
development- Application of Herzberg’s theory companies, the employer hardly find a person
for handling stress effectively the researcher of requisite qualification and aptitude to work
discussed the both kind of stress eustress or for in the company and the employee is asked
positive stress and distress or negative stress, to fulfill every best possible demand of
their impact and the measures to overcome this employer that ultimately Leads to anxiety,
stress with the help of Herzberg’s theory. depression etc. in the employees.
Positive stress factors always motivate an
individual to work efficiently but negative Many authors gave the deep study about it.
stress factors has negative effects on physical Such as Bhavani SA, Sharavan and Arpitha
psychological, behavioral, emotion health (2015) studied about employee engagement and
productivity. They interpret there is direct
1.4 Stress impacts relation between employee engagement and
productivity. If company’s employee is happy
Work stress is a situation in which individual and satisfied he/she will work with emotional
sometimes lost her sense of control, work attachment that will ultimately increase
efficiency, interest in his job. Many productivity and consumer satisfaction.
organizations in United State believe that the Bharathi T and Gupta K.S (2017), examine
increasing rate of stress has dreadful effects on the studies and researches to explain work
235 Journal of Positive School Psychology
Stress and Productive capacity factors. These Stress gives birth to a lot of issues in life but it
factors have been discovered to develop the is curable. Actually stress always gives some
hypothetical structure. The study includes work early signs such as sleeping disturbance,
stress variable such as Heavy Workload, Job irregularity in work, headache, aches and pain,
insecurity, Role obscurity, New Job, Over digestion issues, disrelish, quick pulse rate, loss
Supervision, Job Satisfaction, Work life of eroticism, cold and flu, procrastinating
Balance, Lack of Resource, Different liabilities, addiction of smoke drug etc., over
Commitments, Relationship Conflicts, Official eating or reduced eating, anxious habits like
Support and Sex Discrimination. Timings, desk tapping, irritating behavior etc. Stress can
Competence of Supervisors, Compensation, be identified at this early stage and can be treat
Group Dynamics, Absenteeism and Presentism calmly by adopting some prevention techniques
are the variables used for Productivity. Above and intervention such as company trips,
review of different also supported the friendly behavior, quarterly party etc. Negi
relationship between stress and productivity Poonam (2013) explained in her paper, a
and efficiency. comparative study on job stress among the
employees of SBI and HDFC Bank, the
Stress is affected by different factors such as different stress level and methods to get grips
age, designation, work load, working hours, with it. She introduced three different stages of
workplace atmosphere etc. It’s also revealed stress i.e. Alarm stage, resistance stage,
from studies that young employees experience exhaustion stage. At these stages stress level
more stress instead of old employees. In the increases and correspondingly become more
study of levels of stress by Eric S. Parilla, dangerous. But accurate strategies,
(2012), it revealed that job stress not at affected organizational support friendly social
by personal character but job position. There is environment may be helpful to reduce stress. If
normal stress observed in employees working this stress is not treated well then it can be
under high profile job or top management such more harmful and dangerous then accepted. It
as president or vice president. Highest level of may leads to Suicide, Cancer, Ulcer, Job lay
stress is observed in level of directors and off, Jeopardize Company etc.
deans and balance stress is observed in staff
and faculty level. Kumari Geeta, Joshi To overcome the stress, there must be some
Gaurav, Pandey K. M. (2014), examine in strategies followed by employee and employer
their study conducted in HCL, company with as well. These strategies are helpful to make an
100 employees the level of stress is always employee work more efficiently, effectively
high in young age group. As 93% of employees and dedicatedly. Jain Priyesha, Batra Akhil
felt high level stress under 40 age group. 74% (2015) examine in their paper published in
people felt frustrated because of deadline one IOSR journal that stress can be control if we
after another. Even they often felt lost or losing focus on techniques of reducing stress not only
sense of control in their lives. cause of stress. There should be coordination
and cooperation within the employees and
Work place environment plays an important supervisors. Managers’ friendly behavior and
role to increase the level of stress. Happy and proper feedback always motivate the
healthy environment keeps employees refresh employees to do better.
and energetic to do their work with more
efficiently. Singh vikram and chaudhary
suresh (2017) revealed in their study by
various test i.e. T-test and standard deviation. 2. Literature review
That there is relation between employee’s Daniels k, Gedikli C, Watson D (2017)
workplace and behavior, productivity and interpret in their paper that if the initiatives of
performance. They discussed the term QWL shared social activities is combined it may be
(Quality of work life), if the employee get a enhanced employees welfare. One can’t
good quality of work life he can enjoy his associate a good social environment at the
personal life as well which ultimately reduce workplace without the employee welfare.
stress.
In the comparative study of workplace of
1.5 Stress post effects agriculture and IT Sector by Prasad K.D.V,
Vaidya Rajesh and Kumar V Anil (2016)
Jyoti Kapoor et al. 236
revealed that there is moderate stress at both Wan Hussin (2008) study on stress
situations and one can get grips with this stress management at workplace developed a 3D
by developing some effective strategies by model of stress management. He explained
keeping in mind different factors of stress at stress management strategy in 3 different
work place stages. Where, in I stage he surveyed the exact
situation and called it unexpected stage. In II
Bharathi T and Gupta K.S. (2017), interpret in stage he determined the level of stress and
their study the relation between job stress and called stress projection. And in the last and III
productivity. By the two tests Correlation and stage which is expected stage - the stress
ANOVA. Through regression they proved there findings is based on a stress management
is negative relation between both aspects. If the strategy, mastery techniques and complete
job stress increases there will be decrease in knowledge of physical, mental and
productivity. It’s reveal by the ANOVA TEST occupational consequences.
that population characteristics do not have
difference in work stress. The study of Sankpal, Negi, Vashishtha (2010)
was conducted to com pare manager’s work
Rasool S.F, Samma Madeeha (2020) examine stress in public and private banks with the
in their study, occupational stress does not sample size of 100 employees (50each in both
allow employee to do their work efficiently and private and public sector). This exploratory
effectively. Work place violence plays a huge study reveals that the employees working in
role to increase the level of stress and private banks bear more stress comparative to
diminishing productivity. On the other hand, public bank. There is no dissimilarity is
harassment, mobbing, ostracism, stalking are observed between the employees of both
some other aspects that increase stress and private and public sector in their role
reduce morale, effects on emotional wellbeing, expectation.
lessens productivity leads to anxiety and
depression. In the study of Jayashree, Rajendran (2011) the
main objective of researcher was to analyze
Yogeshwaram p. (2016) examined in his study work stress among the employees of public
that stress affect the employee in both ways sector. The data of 100 employees is collected
physically and psychologically. It affects the through questionnaire and personal interview.
work life and personal life as well. Work life After the pilot study and survey its’ revealed
balance needs the efforts made by all company, that 97 percent of employees are in stress and
government, employee’s family and employee remain 3 percent are fine with their job. The
his self. With the equal contribution of study is proceed with the help of the help of
employer and employee one can overcome this different factors and causes of stress
issue.
The study by Samartha, Begum, Lokesh (2014)
Karthik R. (2013) revealed in his study the has been conducted to analyze the difference
stress level of employees in the personal and among public and privte sector banks stress.
work condition. He says that stress can affect The researcher used both primary and
a person in two ways good or bad. The study secondary data for the study. For the study
explained that if there is moderate stress it can researcher focused on total 6 banks of India
be helpful to do work more efficiently. He also 3each from both public sector and private
discussed the measures and role of organization sector banks. Data is collected from 537
to reduce stress. employees where 126 employees belong to
. Parida Sarit Sambit (2016) discussed in her private sector and remaining 411 belongs to
study about policies adopted by the different public sector. With the help of the chi square
companies i.e. Intel, Tata (manufacturing), city test it’s revealed that level of stress in both
India, HCL, PepsiCo India, Marico, Hindustan banks private and public sectors with respect to
lever ltd., ICICI for the employee’s benefit. their work demand are almost identical.
The study examined that to meet the targets
given to the employee; they have to work after
normal working hours that lead to stress. There 3. OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
should be WLBP’s in the companies for the
employee’s benefit. To analyze the level of stress to the
237 Journal of Positive School Psychology
Fig. 2
The chart in fig 3 shows that 24 employees 52% of employees feel physical, psychological
feels all type of stress which is 48% of total and behavioral stress in their workplace.
sample size, whether employees remaining
Fig 3
Jyoti Kapoor et al. 238
Table 1 show that there are different impacts of hours leads to too much stress and badly affect
work stress on employees at various situations. the work life balance.
Such as during normal working hours 82% of
employees feel zero to moderate stress, while Job recognition: Employees’ work or
after normal working hours 68% of employees performance must be recognize and appreciated
feel low to very high level stress. It also by giving some rewards, incentives, gifts,
disclosed 42% of employees feel that humorous promotion etc.
environment leads to zero stress. Colleagues’ Entertainment activities: HRM should
behavior, tight deadlines, and no support of organize some sports or fun activity, trips,
HRM leads to moderate to very high level events, celebration, monthly party, quiz,
stress. competitions etc. it can be helpful to reduce the
stress level.