Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NABLAW E-newsletter
Good governance being the biggest challenge facing the country, comes from good laws
and implementation of those laws. We have enough of laws and codes. Whenever we talk
of reforming the system, we invariably speak of enacting more/new laws and tougher laws.
We ignore the fact that tougher the laws, stronger will be the evidence required by the
courts to award the toughest of the punishments and Courts are sometimes reluctant to
even to award conviction, because of the fear of miscarriage of justice. What we require
more urgently is the certainity of punishment rather than severity of punishment. Only
certainty of punishment can ensure that the guilt is punished, rule of law is established and
justice is done. However the inordinate delay in justice delivery system has eroded faith of
the public. Even in heinous crimes like rape,murder etc., offenders go scott free, because
of the loopholes in justice delivery systems. What are the solutions ?
Appreciation and availability of evidence is vital while concluding the trial process. Usually,
witness turn hostile and fabricate evidence under pressure from anti social elements. If the
court proceedings are video recorded, it will arm the judiciary to deliver justice, also it
will be open for public scrutiny as cases where even judges have deliberately not focused
on disposal of cases. Our legal system is based on adversarial system where the benefit
of doubt is given to the accused and guilt should be proved beyond reasonable doubts by
the prosecution. Along with that our procedural and substantive laws are archaic and not in
sync with the evolving technology, changing social equilibrium, gender sensitivity etc.
The statistics say that Govt is the largest litigant and public money is blocked till the finality
is reached in civil disputes. A simple in house mechanism in all Govt Dept can be set
up,and more importantly alternate dispute resolution should be promoted to settle such
disputes.
From governance in general to financial governance, IMF in it's financial system stability
update report on India has commented that the multiple roles of RBI may create a potential
for conflicting roles of RBI. RBI Officer are nominated as Directors on the board of Public
sector, the Banking system is used (rather than the government machinery) in meeting the
needs of priority sector – may conflict with RBI's supervisory role. However the point that
has been overlooked in the IMF report is that the very use of the Banking system by
government to meet the needs of priority sector is because the banking channels are
much more reliable, transparent and robust for delivering the benefits rather than the
Government' own direct delivery channels.
To end on an alarming note - world over from, crimes committed by juveniles are on the
rise. It is high time to realize its not the age of juvenile but the intention which should be
sole criteria to punish them.
U. N. Srivastava
POLICE REFORMS
Indian Police are governed by archaic and colonial police laws of 1861. In 1977,
Government of India set up a National Police Commission which had submitted eight
covering the entire gamut of police working. Since then there have been recommendations
and committees. The police also very often make politicization as an alibi for their non-
September 22, 2006, ordered the setting up of three institutions at the state level with a
view to insulating the police from extraneous influences, giving its functional autonomy
● State Security Commission which would lay down the broad policies and give
directions for the performance of the preventive tasks and service oriented
● Police Establishment Board comprising the Director General of Police and four other
Senior Officers of the Department which shall decide all transfers, postings,
promotions and other service related matters of officers of and below the rank of
the postings and transfer of officers of the rank of Superintendent of Police and
● Police complaints Authority at the district and state levels with a view to inquiring
The Supreme Court orders, if implemented, would have far reaching implications for better
governance and administrations of criminal justice. They would change the working
philosophy of the police. The Ruler's Police would be transformed into People's Police. The
reforms are not for the glory of the police. The police will be made more accountable to
the law and the people. They will ensure better security and protection to the people of
the country, uphold their human rights and generally improve the governance as a whole.
We cannot afford to lose any more time. The police force must be reorganized, revitalized
and given the necessary morale, manpower and equipment. It must also undergo
It is common knowledge that the cost of funds and interest margin may not be the same
for all Banks and FI and is much dependent on their operational efficiency, deposit
mobilization and effectiveness of their business models. While the PSU banks resort to
periodically increasing or decreasing term (fixed) deposit rates, savings account rates
were only raised in May 2011, that too after RBI mandated an increase from 3.5% to 4%.
The RBI's move to an unregulated regime a few months later was opposed by most public
sector banks. However despite the deregulation of Savings Bank interest rates in October
2011 by RBI, only five private players, 10 foreign banks and a cooperative bank including
Kotak Mahindra and Yes Bank have increased their savings deposit rate by one to five
percentage points. The common, 4% interest rate being paid rest of all public sector banks
on savings bank deposits seems to be acting in tandem. Because of this policy, small
depositors are losing out and also the banks are also losing business. By keeping interest
rates on savings bank deposits unchanged at 4%, banks have managed to ensure a
healthy net interest margin, which is the difference between the cost of funds and the rate
Competition Commission of India, the fair play watchdog, has decided to investigate the
matter. The PSU banks counter that cartelisation argument and say that Every bank has
its own policy and no one exchanges notes. It is only banks with a small network of
CIR or Credit Information Reports are relied upon by the Banks/FIs, forming an important
element of the decision matrix, as to whether to go ahead with a particular loan proposal or
not. CIRs are nothing but a snapshot of past history of the borrowing and repayment
transactions of a borrowing entity with all his Banks/ FI. It is extracted from the legacy data
built up over the years, by submission of credit data by all the Banks and FI, of all their
Based on the past repayment track record, credit scores are alloted to the borrowers. Such
score card (which is borrower specific and is different from credit risk rating of borrower) of
past repayment track record, forms the basis in deciding the quantum of loan and loan
pricing (interest rate). The entire exercise depends upon the authenticity and correctness
of the past credit transaction data submitted by Banks to credit rating agency. The latent
problem arises when a borrower is affected due to wrong data submitted by Banks/ FI s,
because a borrower can neither challenge nor rectify nor has any other remedy, if
information about him, provided by lenders to the credit bureau is factually incorrect. A
faulty CIR based on faulty data about a borrower, results in wrongful rejection of his loan
At present there are four different Credit bureaus operating in INDIA – CIBIL, Experian,
Equifax and High Mark. To add further to the woes and confusion of borrower, the basic
report of past repayment history from all these bureaus is not similar. This is because the
Banks are selectively sharing the data only with CIBIL as a result of which the other three
bureau have very thin legacy data and are unable to provide any valuable CIR.
SEBI has framed a new set of guidelines for consent order mechanism 9discussed in the
case dealing with alleged flouting of securities laws without the individual or company
involved admitting or denying guilt. The alleged party gets absolved of the charges by
PENSION SECTOR
The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) was earlier planning
to allow the entry of more fund managers in November last year, but the deadline could not
be met. There hasn't been a overwhelming response as foreign players are awaiting the
passage of PFRDA Bill, which was again deferred in the winter session. The Bill proposes
the entry of foreign players with the same holding as it is for insurance sector, which is now
at 26% and it is proposed to be raised to 49% as per the insurance Bill. In 2012, the
PFRDA decided to grant licenses on the basis of certain stringent eligibility criteria rather
than auction based on the cost of managing the funds. Even existing players have to
renew their certificate of registrations after complying with the new guidelines, which
mandates a company to have a minimum net worth of Rs.25 crore, a three year profit
record and managing assets of at least Rs.8,000 crore. In 2007, the PFRDA allowed state-
owned Life Insurance Corporation, State Bank of India and UTI AMC to set up pension
fund companies and mange the long-term savings of Government staff. After two years,
PFRDA allowed four private players – IDFC Pension Fund Management, ICICI Prudential
Pension Fund Management, Kotak Mahindra Pension Fund and Reliance Capital Pension
– into the sector. These PFMs now manage assets worth over Rs.20,000 crore of 3.75
pension funds, banks, mutual funds and insurance companies were eager to enter the fast
growing pension sector, restrictions on the number of players and selection criteria based
on the lowest bid for fund management charges have deterred them. Sensing this, the
PFRDA in July 2012 abolished the bidding process and announced a list of eligibility
criteria to allow new players. The Pension fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill,
which aims to empower PFRDA as a statutory regulator of the New Pension System(NPS)
and allows 26% FDI among other reforms, was introduced in Parliament in 2005. It has
approval of the Standing Committee headed by BJP leader Yashwant Sinha. The bill may
LEGISLATION SECTION
We may be wondering as to what regulation, if at all is required, for wine Industry in India.
The representatives of the Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), National
Research Centre for Grapes (NRC), APEDA, Pune Excise Department, Agriculture
Departments and the Ministry of Food Processing Industry, agricultural processed food
products export development authority and All-India Wine Producers' Association (AIWPA)
in a joint establishing the identity of Indian wine in the international markets Indian
Indian wines in intl market. It is in the process of formulating standards and coming up with
a wine legislation for Indian wines. This move is not only expected to help Indian wines
make a mark in the export market but also create an own indigenous identity in the wine
market globally. India has accepted membership of the International Organization on Wine
and Wine (OIV) and this would entail adopting wine-related international rules, regulations
and laws. The legislation will include product definition like sparkling, carbonated, fortified,
still, organic and herbal wines will also be decided. The label on the wine bottle will also
include the name of the wine grape variety. The alcoholic proportion in different wines will
also be decided. The legislation will also help prevent the cheap ans substandard wines
The Lok Sabha has approved an amendment bill to make easier recovery of bad loans by
banks. The Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment)
Bill, 2011, which was approved by Lower House, seeks to convert any part of debt into
shares of defaulting company by the Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC). Banks or any
person (most often the third party auction sale purchaser of security under SARFAESI) to
file a caveat so that before granting any stay, the bank or person is heard by the Debt
Recovery Tribunal.
The upper house of Parliament on 20/12/2012 cleared the bill, two days after on
18/12/2012 the Lok Sabha, the lower house, gave the legislation its nod to the long
awaited Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2012, paving the way for issuance of new bank
Advantages:
percent from the existing 10 percent. Shareholders' voting rights in the public sector
The RBI gets wide ranging power to inspect books of business groups that have a
bank – it can appoint Directors and Chairman, and it can veto bulk purchases of a
bank's shares.
The new regulation also seeks to bring the banking sector under the competition
commission purview.
Modified legislation would help create to "world size" banks in India. With the passage of
the Bill, big corporate houses like Tatas, Reliance and also entities in the public sector
would be eligible to obtain licenses to set up banks. RBI is empowered to frame the
guidelines and issue new bank licenses. The RBI will be regulator of the banking sector,
while, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) will look into competition practices in the
banking sector. This will make the Indian banking sector attractive for the overseas
Points of caution: Therefore, entry of too many private banks is detrimental as public
money deposited in the banks, which can be misused for the benefit of few corporate
RBI gets more powers, can supersede bank Industrial houses to get licenses to operate banks
board.
More foreign and domestic investment to flow
Voting rights of shareholders in banks go
in
up.
Banks not allowed to trade in commodity Could have proved to be a hedging tool for
futures. banks
RBI to be banking regulator, CCI to regulate
Bank M&As may need clearance by two regulators
M&As
More teeth to the shareholder and empowers him to take legal action against
a company for fraud. The act provides that: “Shareholders associations or group
action on the part of company and to take part in investor protection activities and
class action suits. The legislation grants statutory powers to the Serious Fraud
Investigation Office (SFIO) to tackle corporate fraud. The SFIO will get a big fillip
strengthen regulations for companies and auditing firms. Although the bill does not
CSR condition will apply to firms that have a net worth in excess of Rs 500 crore, or
The act proposes to tighten the laws for raising money from the public. The move
will hit chit funds. Only banking companies, NBFCs and other firms allowed by
A director’s remuneration should not exceed five per cent of a company’s net profit.
The new law also aims to strengthen corporate governance. It will be mandatory for
Audit firms cannot take up more than 20 assignments at any time. The appointment
If a company winds up operations, it must pay two years’ salary to its employees.
The bill also bans buy back of shares within one year of the last buyback of shares.
The new policy caps prices of 348 essential medicine formulations at the arithmetic
average of all drugs in a particular segment with a minimum of one per cent market
share .
with the wholesale price index (WPI). As a corollary though, the companies will also
have to cut these prices if there is a decline in the index prices of these drugs,which
will be determined by market forces. The government reserves the right to intervene
within the next 12 months if prices increase by more than 10 per cent annually.
A standard nomenclature for critical illnesses has been proposed for both hospitals
and insurers to follow, so that customers do not face any difficulty while taking a
policy. Cancer, coma, first heart attack, kidney failure and organ transplant are
some of the diseases mentioned in critical illness category. The regulator has
illnesses including skin cancer and HIV induced diseases. Customer also face
problems while hospitalization, since they are not aware of the expenses excluded
in such indemnity policies. To curb this anomaly, Irda has proposed that a standard
list of exclusions in such hospitalization indemnity including areas like baby food,
The regulator, however, has allowed the companies to include the excluded items of
hospital the regulator mandated that a facility should have at least 10 inpatient beds
in towns having population less than 1 million and 15 inpatient beds in towns and
cities having population above 1 million to treat the patients under health coverage.
The exposure draft called for standardizing billing formats and enabling mapping of
companies for faster claim processing and enhanced analysis of data. The
committee has suggested that the bill is expected to be in two formats, one would
be the summary bill and the detailed breakup of the bills. It has been suggested that
the summary bill the provider has to mention the service tax number in case they
charge service tax to the insurance company / TPA among others. Further in
mentioned in the bill. Some providers have outsourced the pharmacy to external
vendors. For implementation, the committee has suggested that a central body for
TPAs, IRDA has proposed that the TPA shall only process the claim to facilitate the
the insurer shall have the right to settle or repudiate a claim. It has called for TPAs
to process all the claims applications to the extent possible within 2 working days
The IRDA will make these mandatory across the insurance industry after
receiving suggestions and comments from the stakeholders, who have been given
JUDGEMENT SECTION
The Supreme Court has held that the service of a copy of an arbital award on the agent or
a lawyer of a party to the agreement did not amount to service on the party itself as per
the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The issue before the court in
the case Benarsi Krishna Committee vs Karmayogi Shelters Ltd wa whether the service of
an arbitral award on the agent of a party amounts to service on the party itself under
Sections 31(5) and 34(3) of the Act.
In this case, the Committee of Managing Landlords, the co-owners of the Benarsi Krishna
Estate in Delhi, had amended its collaboration agreement of November 1990, by which
Karmayogi Shelters Ltd (KSL), an estate developer, was to convert a cinema hall
compound into a commercial complex. As disputes arose between the parties over the
payment scheme, KSL sought appointment of an arbitrator before the Delhi High Court,
which appointed Justice K Ramamoorthy, a retired judge, as the sole arbitrator. The
arbitrator held the company guilty of committing breach of agreement and directed the
committee to refund the money to the developer within three months.
The copy of the award was available with the lawyer, but not the firm itself. This caused a
delay of nine months. A single-judge bench in August 2009 held that if the lawyer or agent
got the copy of the award, it would amount to the party itself getting it. But the division
bench overruled this and insisted that the award should be served properly on the party
itself. On appeal, the Supreme Court upheld this view by accepting the stand of Senior
Counsel K V Viswanathan, who on behalf of the firm argued that after conclusion of the
hearing and passing of the award by the Arbitrator, the power given to an advocate came
to an end and the advocate was no longer entitled to act on the strength thereof.
In view of conflicting views by its various benches, the Supreme Court has referred to a
larger bench the issue related to the maintainability of a review petition in a High Court
after the disposal of the special leave petition (SLP) by the apex court without granting
leave. In the case Khoday Distilleries Ltd vs Mahadeshwara SSK Ltd., the former had
challenged the Karnataka High Court's decision that ruled that a review petition cannot be
moved after approaching the Supreme Court. On appeal, the apex court said that a large
number of review petitions are being filed in High Courts after the Supreme Court
dismissed the SLPs. Thus, an authoritative pronouncement by a constitution bench is
necessary to resolve contrary opinions of the apex court for proper guidance to the High
Courts. Mahadeshwara, by relying on the top court's judgment in Abhai Maligai Partnership
Firm vs K.Santhkumaran, had contended that decision would squarely apply to th facts of
this case and the HC had rightly dismissed the review petition by holding that when the
judgment and decree passed by the HC was confirmed by the Supreme Courat while
dismissing the SLP, there was no question of entertaining the review petition. Counsel
Gopal Jain, appearing for Khoday Distilleries submitted that the HC has committed a grave
error in dismissing the review petition since the SLP was dismissed at the admission stage
by a non-speaking order and it would not constitute resjudicata and does ot culminate in
In order to provide full banking services to rural people, who still depend on informal credit
sources, the Department of Posts is likely to finalise plans for setting up the Post Bank of
India. For a providing better clarity on the organizational structure of the proposed Post
Bank of India, a detailed project report (DPR) is expected to be in place in a few weeks.
The proposed Post Bank of India will be a profit making entity which would essentially help
the Department of Posts in reducing its deficit and might also provide ATM services in
remote areas, besides taking core-banking facilities to the rural areas. The standing
committee have asked the Department of Posts to establish the Post Bank of India within
The India business houses are becoming more and more international. It is critical for
professionals and companies in information technology and other sectors engaged in other
countries; issues like foreign exchange variations and difference in the timing of filing tax
returns need to be immediately tackled. The Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT) is
drafting rules for foreign tax credit (FTC), to bring in clarity in its administration. At present,
there are no set rules for foreign tax credit, making it difficult for assessees to decide on
credit claims and leads to either undue harassment for the taxpayers or litigation. The
guiding principle to decide on FTC is the double tax avoidance agreement (DTAA) with the
country in which tax has been paid, for which the credit has to be taken in India. If the tax
payment has been made in a country with which India does not have a DTAA, the Income-
Tax Act provisions are the deciding factors. The question is how to compute taxes in cases
like dividend, distribution, etc, in which tax rates are different in different countries.
The Direct Taxes Code (DTC) seeks to streamline the system and has proposed FTC rules
under section 207. Clause 207 of the DTC Bill, 2010, is associated with foreign tax credit
allowable to an assessee, being a resident in India in any financial year on income which
is taxed in India as well as outside India. The clause states that where the assessee is
required to pay Indian income-tax in respect of an income that has been taxed in any
specified territory or other country with which India has a DTAA, the foreign tax credit will
be allowed in accordance with the agreement. Where there is no such agreement, the tax
credit will be determined at the Indian rate of tax or the rate of tax of the other country,
whichever is lower. The credit in either case will not exceed the Indian income-tax payable
in respect of income which is taxed outside India and the Indian income-tax payable on
total income of the assessee. It also provides that CBDT, for the relief or avoidance of
double taxation, prescribes the method for computing the amount of credit, manner of
A finance commission is set up every five years by the President under Article 200 of the
Constitution. Its main function is to recommend how the Union Government should share
taxes levied by it with the states. These recommendations cover a period of five years.
The commission is also lays down rules by which the centre should provide grants-in-aid
Under the federal structure envisaged in the Constitution most of the taxation powers are
with the Centre but the bulk of spending is done by the states. Such a federal structure
requires transfer of resources from the centre, which levies and collects the big taxes such
as income tax and indirect taxes like excise and customs, to the states.
Yes. The government can ask the commission to make suggestions on specific fiscal issues
that it may want addressed. For instance, the government has asked the 14 th Finance
insulate pricing of public utility services like the drinking water, irrigation, power and public
transport from policy fluctuations. The new commissions will also look at the impact of
GST and suggest a mechanism to compensate states in case of revenue loss. Besides, it
The Constitution does not make the recommendations of the Finance Commission of the
Finance Commission binding on the government of the day. However, there is a strong
capital market. The deduction under the Scheme shall be available to a new retail investor
who complies with the conditions of the Scheme and whose gross total income for the
financial year in which the investment is made under the Scheme is less than or equal to
ten lakh rupees. The scheme, which has a lock-in period of three years, would allow for
income tax deduction of 50 per cent to new retail investors who invest up to Rs. 50,000
directly in equities and whose annual income is less than Rs.10 lakh.
Disclaimer
The Information/ news items contained in this news letter have appeared in various external
sources/media for public use or consumption. The present is a selective compilation meant
for internal consumption of fellow NABARDians. The views expressed and / or events
narrated /stated in the said Information /news item are as perceived by the respective source.
The Law Department, NABARD neither holds nor assumes any responsibility for the
correctness or adequacy or otherwise of the news items, events, facts or any information
whatsoever.