You are on page 1of 32

Chapter 10

Managing Employees’ Performance

freesoulproduction/Shutterstock

© 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. 1
What Do I Need to Know? 1

LO 10-1 Identify the activities involved in performance management.


LO 10-2 Discuss the purposes of performance management systems.
LO 10-3 Define five criteria for measuring the effectiveness of a performance
management system.
LO 10-4 Compare the major methods for measuring performance.
LO 10-5 Describe major sources of performance information in terms of their
advantages and disadvantages.

© McGraw Hill 2
What Do I Need to Know? 2

LO 10-6 Define types of rating errors, and explain how to minimize them.
LO 10-7 Explain how to provide performance feedback effectively.
LO 10-8 Summarize ways to produce improvement in unsatisfactory performance.
LO 10-9 Discuss legal and ethical issues that affect performance management.

© McGraw Hill 3
The Process of Performance Management

Performance management requires:


• Knowing what activities and outputs are desired.
• Observing whether the activities and outputs occur.
• Providing feedback to help employees meet expectations.

Benefits:
• Tells top performers they are valued.
• Encourages communication between managers and their employees.
• Establishes consistent standards for evaluating employees.
• Helps the organization identify its strongest and weakest employees.

© McGraw Hill 4
Figure 10.1 Steps in the Performance Management Process

Sources: Based on E. Pulakos, Performance Management (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell,


2009); H.Aguinis, “An Expanded View of Performance Management,” in
Performance Management, ed. J. W. Smith and M. London (San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 2009), pp. 1–43; J. Russell and L. Russell, “Talk Me Through It:
Access the text alternative for slide images. The Next Level of Performance Management,” T + D, April 2010, pp. 42–48.
© McGraw Hill 5
Purposes of Performance Management

Strategic Purpose
• Helps organization achieve business objectives.
• Measurements must be linked to the organization’s goals.

Administrative Purpose
• Ways that organizations use the system to provide information for day-to-day
decisions.

Developmental Purpose
• Basis for developing employees’ knowledge and skills.

© McGraw Hill 6
1
Suppose you are a manager and the performance management
system your company used often created competition among
POLLING QUESTION
team members. How would you address this issue?

😊A. I wouldn’t do anything; competition is good.


❤B. I would make collaboration be one of the criteria for evaluation.
👍C. I would increase the specificity of the feedback I provided.
✌ D. I would focus my review on personality traits, rather than tasks.

© McGraw Hill 7
Criteria for Effective Performance Management

Effective Performance Measures


Fit with strategy: support company’s strategy, goals, and culture.
Validity: measure all relevant aspects of performance and not the irrelevant ones.
Reliability: yield consistent results over time.
• Interrater reliability.
• Test-retest reliability.

Acceptability: accepted by those who use it.


Specific feedback: give specific expectations and methods to achieve goals.

© McGraw Hill 8
Figure 10.2 Contamination and Deficiency of a Job Performance Measure

Access the text alternative for slide images.


© McGraw Hill 9
Methods for Measuring Performance 1

Making Comparisons
Simple ranking: managers rank employees from highest to poorest performer.
• Alternation ranking.

Forced-distribution method: assigns a certain percentage of employees to each


category in a set of categories.
Paired-comparison method: compares each employee with the others to establish
rankings.
Rankings are often not linked to the organization’s goals, and the ranking is open to
interpretation.

© McGraw Hill 10
Methods for Measuring Performance 2

Rating Attributes

Graphic Rating Scale Mixed-Standard Scale

• Lists traits and provides a rating scale • Uses several statements to describe
for each trait. each trait.
• Employer uses scale to indicate extent • Employer scores employee in terms of
to which employee displays each trait. how employee compares to
• Rating scales are subjective and vary by statements.
employer.

© McGraw Hill 11
Methods for Measuring Performance 3

Rating Behaviors

Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale


Critical-Incident Method
(BARS)
• Specific instances of effective and • Builds on critical-incidents.
ineffective employee behavior
• Behaviors rated in terms of scale
documented. showing specific statements that
• Employees receive feedback about describe behaviors at different levels of
what they do well and what they do performance.
poorly.

© McGraw Hill 12
Methods for Measuring Performance 4

Rating Behaviors continued

Organizational Behavior Modification


Behavioral Observation Scale (BOS)
(OBM)
• A variation of BARS. • Builds on branch of psychology call
• Rating scale includes all critical behaviorism.
behaviors. • Employer provides feedback and
• Asks the manager to rate frequency reinforcement to encourage behaviors
with which employee has exhibited that achieve company goals.
each behavior during period.

© McGraw Hill 13
Methods for Measuring Performance 5

Measuring Results
Productivity: getting more done with smaller amount of resources increases a company’s
profits.
Management by objectives (MBO):
• People at each level of organization set goals in process that flows from top to bottom.
• Employees at all levels contribute to organization’s overall goals.
• Set goals become the standards for evaluating employee performance.
• Three components:
1. Goals are specific, difficult, and objective.
2. Managers work with employees to set goals.
3. Manager gives objective feedback to monitor progress.
© McGraw Hill 14
Methods for Measuring Performance 6

Total Quality Management


Assessment of both individual performance and the system within which the
individual works.
• Yields subjective feedback from managers.
• Yields objective feedback based on work process; obtained from a variety of methods
called statistical quality control.

© McGraw Hill 15
Total Quality Management

ATQM approach to performance


measurement includes subjective feedback
from managers, peers, and customers as
well as objective feedback based on the
work process.

© McGraw Hill John Fedele/Blend Images LLC 16


Sources of Performance Information

360-Degree Performance Appraisal


Performance measurement that combines information from a variety of sources.
• Managers.
• Peers.
• Subordinates.
• Self.
• Customers.

Results in most complete assessment possible.

© McGraw Hill 17
Customer Feedback

Customer feedback is one source of


information used in performance
appraisals. Other sources include
managers, peers, subordinates, and
employees themselves.

© McGraw Hill Ronnie Kaufman/Getty Images 18


Errors in Performance Measurement 1

Types of Rating Errors


Raters tend to give higher evaluations to people they think are similar to themselves.
Contrast error: rater compares individual not against objective standard but against other
employees.
Distributional error: rater uses only part of rating scale.
• Leniency: reviewer rates everyone near top.
• Strictness: reviewer favors lower rankings.
• Central tendency: reviewer rates everyone in middle of scale.
Rater bias: rater lets their opinion of one quality color their opinion of others.
• Halo error: bias causes favorable ratings.
• Horns error: bias causes negative ratings.
© McGraw Hill 19
Figure 10.6 Possible Ratings Errors in Performance Measurement

Access the text alternative for slide images.


© McGraw Hill 20
Bill rates all of his employees very low except for Jan. Bill gives
Jan above average ratings because she consistently comes to
2
POLLING QUESTION
work on time. Bill makes the rating errors of
for his team and of for Jan.

A. leniency; horn.
B. strictness; halo.
C. similar-to-me; central tendency.
D. horn; strictness.

© McGraw Hill 21
Errors in Performance Measurement 2

Ways to Reduce Errors


Raters can be trained to avoid making errors using a variety of methods.
• Rating fictional employees and discussing decisions.
• Studying actual examples of various performances.
• Focusing on complex nature of employee performance.

Data analytics can be used to find patterns.

© McGraw Hill 22
Errors in Performance Measurement 3

Political Behavior in Performance Appraisals


Sometimes raters are political; they distort evaluations to advance their own
personal goals.
Calibration meetings can be used to minimize politics.
• Managers discuss performance ratings and provide evidence supporting their ratings
with goal of eliminating intentional errors.

© McGraw Hill 23
Giving Performance Feedback 1

Scheduling Performance Feedback


Should be a regular, expected management activity.
Beneficial when scheduled frequently.
• Most effective when information does not surprise employee.
• Employees motivated when they know if they are on right track.

© McGraw Hill 24
Giving Performance Feedback 2

Preparing for a Feedback Session When giving performance feedback, do it in an


appropriate meeting place that is neutral and
• Managers and employees should be free of distractions. What other factors are
well prepared for each session. important for a feedback session?

• Managers should ask each employee to


complete a self-assessment ahead of
time.

Ryan McVay/Getty Images


© McGraw Hill 25
Giving Performance Feedback 3

Conducting the Feedback Session


“Tell-and-sell” approach.
• Managers tell employees their ratings and justify those ratings.

Tell-and-listen” approach.
• Managers tell employees their ratings and then let employees explain their own
view.

“Problem-solving” approach.
• Managers and employees work to solve performance problems.

© McGraw Hill 26
Finding Solutions to Performance Problems

The type of action taken depends on what employee lacks.


• Lack of ability.
• Lack of motivation.
• Lack of both.
• Lack of neither.

Employees with high ability and high motivation are generally solid performers.

© McGraw Hill 27
Figure 10.7 Questions for Diagnosing Remedies to Performance Problems

Sources: Based on G. Rummler, “In Search of the Holy


Performance Grail,” Training and Development, April
1996, pp. 26–31; C. Reinhart, “How to Leap over Barriers
to Performance,” Training and Development, January
2000, pp. 20–24; F. Wilmouth, C. Prigmore, and M. Brya,
“HPT Models: An Overview of the Major Models in the
Access the text alternative for slide images. Field,” Performance Improvement 41 (2002), pp. 14–21.
© McGraw Hill 28
Legal and Ethical Issues in Performance Management 1

Legal Requirements for Performance Management


Lawsuits often arise in two areas:
• Discrimination.
• Unjust dismissal.

The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures also apply to


performance measurement.

© McGraw Hill 29
Legal and Ethical Issues in Performance Management 2

Legal Requirements for Performance Management continued


System should be legally defensible.
• Based on valid job analyses.
• Evaluations based on behaviors rather than traits.
• Uses multiple raters whose ratings can be appealed.
• Provides employees with feedback and coaching or training.

© McGraw Hill 30
Legal and Ethical Issues in Performance Management 3

Electronic Monitoring and Employee Privacy


Organizations often store records of employees’ performance ratings, disciplinary
actions, and work-rule violations in electronic databases.
Many companies use computers, sensors, and mobile devices to monitor
productivity and other performance measures electronically.
• Can improve productivity, but raises privacy concerns.
• Electronic systems should not be a substitute for careful management.

© McGraw Hill 31
End of Chapter 10

© 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. 32

You might also like