Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective: To describe the findings of short Hammersmith Neona- abnormal signs on short HNNE. 12 (37.5%) AGA infants and 6
tal Neurologic examination (HNNE) in preterm small for gestational (30%) SGA infants had global score <65 at mean corrected age
age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants at (SD) of 4.3 (0.7) weeks and 4.5 (0.8) weeks, respectively. Very
term equivalent age (TEA) and to correlate it with the global score of preterm, birth weight <1000 g and SGA was significantly associated
Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Examination (HINE) performed at with global scores <65.
4-6 months of corrected age.
Conclusion: Early identification of warning signs among SGA in-
Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the high fants using Short HNNE screening at TEA can be useful to initiate
risk follow-up clinic of our center. 52 preterm infants born <35 early intervention. There was no statistically significant difference in
weeks gestation were examined using HNNE at TEA and followed- global scores by HINE among AGA and SGA infants in early in-
up till 4-6 months of corrected age to estimate HINE. fancy.
Results: 20 infants (38.5%) had warning signs and 9 (17.3%) had Keywords: Low birth weight, Prognosis, Small for gestational age.
P
reterm infants are known to be at high risk for within the reference range (90%); the lateral columns include
developmental delays because of their gestatio- all the warning signs and the last line indicates abnormal
nal age, morbidities associated with prematurity, signs. The authors have reported that the short HNNE was
and consequences of interventions in the neonatal able to identify 98.5% preterm infants with an abnormal full
intensive care unit (NICU) [1]. Additionally, adequate neurologic examination (complete HNNE) at term [7,8]. The
intrauterine growth of fetus is essential for normal extra- Hammersmith infant neurological examination (HINE) has
uterine growth and development [2,3]. Early recognition of been proposed as a simple and scorable early neurological
abnormal neurologic signs as predictors of neurodevelop- examination tool for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy for
mental delay in infants at risk due to prematurity and related evaluating infants between 2 months and 24 months of age.
morbidities is essential to introduce early intervention [4-6]. Significant correlation between the HNNE and HINE score
to predict infants at risk of cerebral palsy in early infancy has
Several tools are available to screen infants from
been reported [9]. Similar data regarding short HNNE has
neonatal period to identify those at risk of developmental
not been reported.
delay. Hammersmith neonatal neurological examination
(HNNE), initially developed by Dubowitz in 1981, has 34
Invited Commentary:Page 619
items assessing tone, motor patterns, observation of
spontaneous movements, reflexes, visual and auditory India is a major contributor of preterm and low birth
attention, and behavior. Short Hammersmith neonatal weight infants with intrauterine growth restriction. A quick
neurological examination is a screening tool consisting of 12 and reliable screening tool such as short HNNE can be of
items modified from original complete HNNE. This tool is significant help in identification of infants in the busy follow-
used to assess the posture, tone, movement, reflexes, and up clinics.
motor milestones in the both term and preterm infants at term
equivalent age (TEA). The proforma has a central grey In this study, we intended to examine preterm infants
column that covers the spectrum of neurologic findings (born <35 weeks gestational age) at TEA using short HNNE
and then at four to six months of corrected age using HINE. Kerala. The findings were recorded in the standardized form
The primary objective was to describe the preterm infants and scored as per the protocol.
using short HNNE at TEA and to correlate it with the HINE
Neurosonogram was done as part of routine protocol at
global score performed at four to six months of corrected
TEA. All the infants received early stimulation and inter-
age. The secondary objective was to compare this finding
vention as deemed necessary during follow-up from trained
among small for gestational age (SGA) and adequate for
psychologists and physiotherapists.
gestational age (AGA) infants.
Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using statistical
METHODS
software R version 4.0.2 and Microsoft Excel. Continuous
This prospective observational study was conducted among variables were represented by mean (SD)/median (range)
a cohort of preterm infants less than 35 weeks who were and categorical variables represented by frequency and
identified to be SGA or AGA at birth and followed-up in the percentage. Chi-square test was used to check the association
high-risk follow-up clinic of a tertiary care hospital in between categorical variables and t test/Mann-Whitney test
Karnataka from October, 2019 to September, 2020. to compare mean/distributions between groups. Monte-
Carlo simulation used in chi-square test was used to assess
Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethics
the primary and secondary objectives of the study.
committee of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and a
written informed consent was obtained from the parents. RESULTS
Preterm infants born <35 weeks gestation discharged from
Out of total 99 infants who were examined at 40 weeks of
the NICU and followed-up at the high-risk baby clinic of the
gestation (39+1 to 41+6 weeks), 52 infants were examined
hospital were included. Infants with proven intrauterine
using both short HNNE and HINE during the study period
infection, major congenital malformations requiring surgery,
and were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). Twenty infants
proven inborn errors of metabolism, and proven genetic/
were SGA and 32 infants were in AGA group. Table I gives
syndromic condition known to be associated with
the demographic details of the infants enrolled in the study.
developmental delay before enrolment were excluded. The
infants were categorized based on birthweight into SGA Among 52 infants, 20 (38.4%) had warning signs and 9
(below 10th centile) and AGA (between 10th to 90th centile) (17.3%) had abnormal signs using Short HNNE at TEA.
based on Fenton preterm growth chart [9]. Sixteen (80%) of these infants with warning signs were very
preterm, and rest four were extreme preterm. Fourteen
Based on previous studies of 15% abnormal findings
infants had single warning sign and six infants (11.5%) had
among preterm infants using complete HNNE, the sample
≥2 warning signs. Maximum number of infants had warning
size with percentage of maximum error as 10% at 95%CI
signs in the spontaneous activity and head control. The mean
was calculated as 49 [8,11,12].
(SD) age of assessment for HINE was 4.4 (0.7) months and
Demographic details, antenatal risk factors and anthro- the median (range) HINE Global score was 66 (35-74). Most
pometry were recorded in a structured form at the time of infants scored low on reflexes and reactions component of
follow-up. Both the examinations were done by either of the HINE.
two examiners, who were not blinded to the records. The
examiners learnt the examination from the educational Table I Demographic Details of the Enrolled Infants
videos available at the Hammersmith neurological exami-
AGA (n=32) SGA (n=20)
nation website, and received additional training at CDC,
Female 12 (37.5) 11 (55)
Gestational age (wk)a 31.56 (2.26) 32.11 (2.26)
99 neonates examined at term equivalent age using HNNE Weight at birth (g)a,b 1562.16 1169.75
(492.4) (333.3)
→ 20 infants not brought for follow-up FC at birth (cm) a 29.97 (1.99) 28.73 (2.01)
Length at birth (cm) a 41.65 (3.78) 40.79 (4.01)
→ 17 infants followed-up till 3 mo corrected age
Ventilated 4 (12.5) 5 (25)
→ 10 infants followed-up at 6 mo corrected age Culture proven sepsis 4 (12.5) 5 (25)
Maternal chorioamnionitis 1 (3.12) 1 (5)
52 infants examined at 4-6 mo corrected
→ age using HINE
Two doses of antenatal steroid 10 (31.2) 14 (70)
IVH (Grade I-II) 2 (6.25) 2 (10)
Fig. 1 Flow chart of participants. Values in no. (%) or amean (SD). All P >0.05 except bP <0.001.
related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are 2021;63:939-46.
appropriately investigated and resolved. 9. Connors R, Sackett V, Machipisa C, et al. Assessing the utility
Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated. of neonatal screening assessments in early diagnosis of
cerebral palsy in preterm infants. Brain Sci. 2022;12:847.
REFERENCES
10. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and metaanalysis to
1. Gladstone M, Oliver C, Van den Broek N. Survival, morbid- revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC
ity, growth and developmental delay for babies born preterm Pediatr. 2013;13:1-13.
in low and middle income countries–a systematic review of 11. Drillien CM. Abnormal neurologic signs in the first year of life
outcomes measured. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0120566. in low birthweight infants: possible prognostic significance.
2. Nosarti C, Murray RM, Hack M, editors. Neurodevelopmen- Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972;14:575-84..
tal outcomes of preterm birth: from childhood to adult life. 12. Romeo DM, Cioni M, Palermo F, et al. Neurological
Cambridge University Press; 2010;2010:1-277. assessment in infants discharged from a neonatal intensive
3. Romeo DM, Brogna C, Sini F, et al. Early psychomotor care unit. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17:192-8.
development of low-risk preterm infants: Influence of 13. Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal behavioral assessment
gestational age and gender. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20: scale. Cambridge University Press; 1995.
518-23. 14. Spittle AJ, Walsh JM, Potter C, et al. Neurobehaviour at term-
4. Levine TA, Grunau RE, McAuliffe FM, et al. Early childhood equivalent age and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years in
neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: A infants born moderate-to-late preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol.
systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;135:126-41. 2017;59:207-15.
5. Chaudhari S, Kulkarni S, Pandit A, et al. Neurological 15. Romeo DM, Ricci D, Brogna C, et al. Use of the hammer-
assessment at three months as a predictor for developmental smith infant neurological examination in infants with cerebral
outcome in high risk infants. Indian Pediatr. 1993;30:528-31. palsy: A critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neu-
6. Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early, accurate diagnosis rol. 2016;58:240-5.
and early intervention in cerebral palsy: Advances in diagnosis 16. Ahya KP, Suryawanshi P. Neonatal periventricular leukoma-
and treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:897-907. lacia: Current perspectives. Res Rep Neonatol. 2018;8:1-8.
7. Romeo DM, Ricci D, van Haastert IC, et al. Neurologic 17. Limperopoulos C, Bassan H, Gauvreau K, et al. Does
assessment tool for screening preterm infants at term age. J cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high
Pediatr. 2012;161:1166-8. prevalence of longterm cognitive, learning, and behavioral
8. Romeo DM, Cowan FM, Haataja L, et al. Hammersmith infant disability in survivors? Pediatrics. 2007;120:584-93.
neurological examination for infants born preterm: Predicting 18. Hagberg H, Mallard C, Jacobsson B. Role of cytokines in pre-
outcomes other than cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. term labour and brain injury. BJOG. 2005;112:16-8.