Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Groups, like all living things, develop over time. The group may begin as a collection of
strangers, but uncertainty gives way to cohesion as members become bound to their group, its
members, and its tasks. This chapter reviews both the causes and consequences of group
cohesion and the development of cohesion over time.
Learning Objectives
Activities
5-1. Group Development. Students can use Tuckman’s (1965) model to trace and describe the changes in
a group to which they belong. They can also (a) complete this exercise at the end of the semester, using
the class as an example and (b) use items from Wheelan and Hochberger’s (1996) questionnaire measure
of group development, which is summarized in Table 5-3 of the text.
Instructions. Study the long-term development of a group to which you currently belong or once
belonged. Select a group that has a history that you can document, rather than one that has only recently
formed. For example, classes that meet for a semester before they disband, sports teams, project teams at
work, and informal friendship cliques are just a few of the types of groups you could examine.
1. Begin by describing the group in detail when it first formed. Give examples and anecdotal evidence
when appropriate.
2. Describe any changes that took place in the group over time. Make note of the extent to which the
group experienced (a) the orientation stage, (b) conflict, (c) increased cohesion and changes in
structure, and (4) a period of high performance. Which of the two theories discussed in the book—
Tuckman’s stage model or Bale’s equilibrium model—best describes your group?
3. Discuss the group socialization processes, focusing mainly on yourself. Has your evaluation,
commitment, and role in the group changed over time. Has the group changed is evaluation and
commitment to you?
5-2. Measuring Cohesion. Much of the confusion about the concept of cohesion arises because
researchers and theorists confound the causes of cohesion with the definition of cohesion. Cohesion arises
from many sources, but it is, at root, just the unity, integrity, and solidarity of a group. The BCI: Basic
Cohesion Index measures cohesion, here defined as group unity (The even items are to be reverse scored).
Instructions. Is this a cohesive group? Please indicate your perceptions of the group by answering each
statement with one of the following:
Strongly Agree (5) Agree (4) Uncertain or Neutral (3) Disagree (2) Strongly Disagree (1)
You can also demonstrate the many components of cohesion by asking students to rate a group that they
belong to currently, or have belonged to in the past. Alternatively, you can ask the students to rate the
class as a group or to just identify the items that they think are indicators of cohesiveness. The items on
the scale are based on Table 5-1, and make up ten subscales of a multicomponent, multilevel measure of
cohesion. The four components are social, task, perceived, and emotional cohesion, and the two levels are
individual and group. The instructions, items, and key follow:
Individual-level 2. For the most part, I like the people 12. I would consider many of the
social cohesion who are members of this group. people in this group to be my friends.
Group-level task 3. Group members work well 13. The group members diligently
cohesion together to achieve group goals. pursue the group’s goals.
Individual-level 4. I enthusiastically contribute to the 14. I am willing to work hard for this
task cohesion group’s goal-related efforts. group’s goals.
Group-level 5. Members are bonded to the group. 15. The members of this group
collective cohesion identify with this group.
Individual-level 6. I identify with this group and its 16. I feel like a part of this group.
collective cohesion members.
Group-level 7. This group has a great amount of 17. The group has team spirit.
emotional cohesion energy.
Individual-level 8. I get excited just being in this 18. I am happy to be a member of this
emotional cohesion group. group.
Group-level 9. This group is well-organized. 19. This group has a high level of
structural cohesion structural integrity.
Individual-level 10. I understand my place in this 20. The role I play in this group is
structural cohesion group. well-defined.
5-4. School Spirit and Group Cohesion. Replicate Reifman’s (2004) study of school spirit at your
university. Reifman, working with colleagues at 20 different universities, developed and administered a
series of measures of a university’s collective “school spirit.” The measures examine the cohesiveness
and esprit de corps of each university, but focus on the university as the level of analysis. The
investigators used a variety of direct and indirect measures, including coding students’ apparel for
evidence of university-affiliation, counting school decals in the student parking lots, measuring
“closeness” with the university using a visual test like that shown in Figure 3-4 of the text, and a modified
version of the Collective Self-esteem Scale (see Table 3-5 of the text). Reifman found that these indexes
were relatively well-correlated, with relationships ranging from .82 (between the visual closeness measure
and the Collective Self-esteem Scale items to .24 (between alumni giving and university apparel worn by
students. [Source: Reifman, A. (2004). Measuring school spirit: A national teaching exercise. Teaching of
Psychology, 31, 18-21.]
5-5. Which Comes First: Success or Cohesion? Cohesion has a such a strong positive connotation,
particularly in connection to team performance, that students sometimes need help recognizing the
strength of the performance-to-cohesion relationship. To demonstrate the impact of outcome on cohesion
ask students to work in small groups on a series of problems.
1. Give each member of the groups a response sheet for their answers, but also a space for them to
indicate their perception of their group’s cohesiveness.
2. Put the questions to the group orally or via a projector, and have the group deliberate briefly to reach an
answer. Give the groups immediate feedback on their answers.
3. At random intervals ask the group members to rate the cohesiveness of their groups on a scale from 1
(not at all cohesive) to 9 (very cohesive).
4. Chart the decline in cohesiveness seen in groups that perform poorly, and the increase in cohesiveness
seen in groups that succeed.
Essay
5.1. Cohesion, properly defined, is the attraction that takes place between individuals and does not entail
attraction to the group as a whole. (F)
5.2. Cohesiveness is such a complex concept that it cannot be defined. (F)
5.3. A group’s cohesion derives from one primary source: interpersonal attraction. (F)
5.4. Equifinality, in systems theory, is the potential to reach a given end state through any one of number
of means. (T)
5.5. Social identity theory suggests that even large groups, such as ethnic groups and nationalities, can
be cohesive. (T)
5.6. Collective efficacy is not just optimism, but member’s shared beliefs that the group is capable of
effectively enacting the activities necessary for successful performance. (T)
5.7. Freud’s replacement hypothesis argued that people must frequently replace current groups with new
groups. (F)
5.8. Relational cohesion theory, like cognitive dissonance theory, argues that people tend to become
more committed to their groups when the group causes members to experience negative, rather than
positive, emotions. (F)
5.9. Open groups tend to be more cohesive than closed groups. (F)
5.10. Group rituals, such as marching together, increase team work but lower overall group cohesion. (F)
5.11. The core stages of Tuckman’s model of group development are, in order, forming, storming,
norming, performing, and adjourning. (T)
Multiple Choice
5.1. What one characteristic of the U.S. Hockey Team most contributed to their win over the Russians?
A. training
B. cohesiveness
C. skill
D. youth
E. morale
Answer: B (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.4. Who defined group cohesion as “the total field of forces which act on members to remain in the
group”?
A. Leon Festinger and his colleagues
B. Michael Hogg
5.5. Rupert is on my soccer team and I like him a great deal, but I really admire Jill because she
epitomizes the qualities I look for in a teammate. As defined by social identity theorist Michael Hogg,
my feelings for Rupert are ___, but my feelings for Jill are ____.
A. individual cohesion; group cohesion
B. specific liking; diffuse liking
C. liking; cohesion
D. direct; reflective
E. personal attraction; social attraction
Answer: E (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.6. Liking for the group is ___ cohesion, whereas high levels of goal-focused team work is ___ cohesion.
A. emotional; team
B. social; structural
C. social; task;
D. attraction; performing
E. personal attraction; social attraction
Answer: C (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.9. Thomas believes that a group is cohesive when it is marked by strong positive bonds of affection
between members of a group. Thomas considers cohesion to be
A. a multidimensional construct.
B. group unity.
C. entitativity.
D. teamwork.
5.10. The group is high in ___ cohesion, for it gives members a feeling of belongingness, “weness,” and
inclusion.
A. attraction
B. social
C. collective
D. task
E. associative
Answer: C (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.11. The group is high in ___ cohesion, for all the members are personally committed to doing their part
to help the group reach its goals.
A. attraction
B. social
C. collective
D. task
E. associative
Answer: D (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.13. The concept of ___ assumes that members can coordinate their efforts to make or do something.
A. teamwork
B. esprit de corps
C. morale
D. cohesion
Answer: A (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.20. According to the Sherifs’ studies of cohesion conducted with young boys attending summer camps
A. Liking between individual members causes cohesion, rather than cohesion causing liking between
members.
B. Groups that engage in positive, enjoyable activities tend to become cohesive.
C. A group, to become cohesion, must sometimes ostracize the least-like members.
D. Highly stratified groups are more cohesive than groups with reciprocal, overlapping attraction
patterns.
E. The presence of subgroups, or cliques, within a group tends to increase the group’s overall
cohesiveness.
Answer: B (The Nature of Cohesion)
5.24. Elizabeth measures how, over time, groups change and evolve. She studies
A. group development.
B. cognitive dissonance.
C. group cohesion.
D. group synergy.
Answer: A (Developing Cohesion)
5.26. Which is NOT one of the stages identified by Tuckman in his theory of group development?
A. storming
B. reforming
C. norming
D. performing
E. adjourning
Answer: B (Developing Cohesion)
5.27. When you are traveling by plane, what stage would you like your cockpit crew to have attained?
A. storming
B. reforming
C. norming
5.29. Conflict is to the ____ stage as increased cohesion is to the ____ stage.
A. storming; norming
B. trouble; conforming
C. disorientated; orientation
D. storming; conforming
E. stress; relaxation
Answer: A (Developing Cohesion)
5.30. People in a group are nervous, very quiet, and overly polite because they have only just met one
another. The group is
A. not yet officially a group.
B. experiencing conflict.
C. in the forming, or orientation, stage.
D. in the task-performance stage.
E. in the individual-collective stage.
Answer: C (Developing Cohesion)
5.32. Group structures, like roles and authority hierarchies, develop during the ____ stage.
A. forming
B. storming
C. adjourning
D. norming
E. performing
Answer: D (Developing Cohesion)
5.33. The U.S. Hockey team, when it played the Russians, was likely at the ___ stage of development.
A. forming
B. storming
C. adjourning
D. norming
E. performing
Answer: E (Developing Cohesion)
5.36. A police task force working to reduce violent crime experienced conflict initially, but then it became
better organized and more effective until, after several years, it disbanded. The task force’s
development is consistent with a ___ model.
A. hierarchical phase
B. successive-stage
C. cyclical
D. balance
E. punctuated equilibrium
Answer: B (Developing Cohesion)
5.37. Bales’ equilibrium model (which argues that, over time, the group oscillates between task and
interpersonal concerns) is an example of a ___ model.
A. hierarchical phase
B. successive-stage
C. cyclical
D. balance
E. punctuated equilibrium
Answer: C (Developing Cohesion)
5.38. The Strikers, a soccer team, go through periods where members play well and show great unity, but
between these phases they tend to experience periods of internal conflict. The Striker’s development
is consistent with a ___ model.
A. hierarchical phase
B. successive-stage
C. cyclical
D. balance
E. punctuated equilibrium
Answer: C (Developing Cohesion)
5.39. Like many groups, the students didn’t get much done until one week before the end of the
semester—at which time the group, out of panic, started working at a furious pace. This group’s
development is consistent with a ___ model.
A. hierarchical phase
B. successive-stage
C. cyclical
5.43. According to Mullen and Copper (1994), cohesiveness, when conceptualized as ____, is positively
correlated with performance.
A. interaction
B. group unity
C. a binding force
D. a form of attraction
E. commitment to the task
Answer: E (p. 138)
5.47. The famous case study of the group of true believers that formed around the psychic Marion Keech
conducted by Festinger and his colleagues indicated that
A. members will leave a group when the costs become too great.
B. groups move through a conflict phase before they reach their cohesive peak.
C. individuals seek rewarding groups, rather than costly ones.
D. members who must invest in the group sometimes become more committed to it.
E. leaders can create cohesiveness by increasing esprit de corps within the group.
Answer: D (Application: Explaining Initiations)
5.48. Basing your conclusion on the Aronson and Mills study of severity of initiation to join a group,
members of a fraternity who wish to bind new inductees to the group should
A. make sure the group engages in “fun” activities.
B. provide a mild initiation procedure.
C. provide a severe initiation procedure.
D. use no initiation procedure.
E. emotionally arouse new members.
Answer: C (Application: Explaining Initiations)
5.49. The Aronson and Mills study of severity of initiation supported ___ theory by finding that increased
costs lead to increased liking for the group.
A. cognitive dissonance
B. cohesion
C. evolutionary
D. social exchange
E. network
Answer: A (Application: Explaining Initiations)