Peer Evaluation Form for Group Work

Your name: Earl Geo Mulig

Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, indicate the extent to which you agree
with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=agree; 4=strongly agree). Total the
numbers in each column.

Evaluation Criteria Group member: Group member: Group member: Group member:
Joyce Christel Jane M. Sheryl Mae G. Ybanez Ramon Angelo S.
Gimpayan Ediolantes

Attends group meetings regularly and 4 3 3

arrives on time.

Contributes meaningfully to group 4 3 2

discussions.

Completes group assignments on time. 4 3 3

Prepares work in a quality manner. 4 4 3

Demonstrates a cooperative and 4 4 4

supportive attitude.

Contributes significantly to the success of 4 4 3

the project.

TOTALS 24 21 17

Feedback on team dynamics:

1. How effectively did your group work?

 In terms of practical experiments, we are efficiently effective but as for coding for the lab report,
Joyce and I are the main workers inputting the lab report. I can say it is effective because I’m not
working alone and they tend to accept the things they told me to do.

2. Were the behaviors of any of your team members particularly valuable or detrimental to the team? Explain.
As far as I observe there is no such harm that our members tend to do to make this team ineffective.
We do meetings to ensure and answer my members' problems and concerns regarding to the lab report.

3. What did you learn about working in a group from this project that you will carry into your next group experience?
From doing the group project initiation is a must to start the project and I’m the one initiating the
project to create the structure and the content of our project. Also as I’m done I will ask to revise and
polish the project thru my group members and I will carry this job onto the next group project.

Adapted from a peer evaluation form developed at Johns Hopkins University (October, 2006)